2.9

John Anderson

Physics - University of North Florida

2.9
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
42%
Would Retake
128
Reviews
2.9
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
2.7
Helpful
3.1
Clarity

42%

Would Retake

128

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

24

4

29

3

29

2

32

1

14

What Students Say

Very good professor and definitely knows his stuff

AST2002 - 5.0 rating

He covers the material he is supposed to in a timely manner

AST2000 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

91%

Textbook Required

85%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

92% confidence
Based on 14 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (5)
A (4)
B (3)
Grade Distribution
A(9)B(3)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 16 reported grades
A+: 5
A: 4
B: 3
Fail: 1
Common Tags
GROUP PROJECTS (4)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Respected (3)
Group projects (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (2)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (2)
Clear grading criteria (1)
SO MANY PAPERS (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.16 avg change
Oct
Nov
Apr
May
Apr
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

AST2100

5.0

(1)

PHY2049L

4.5

(4)

PHY2048L

4.2

(5)

PHYSICAIILAB

4.0

(1)

AST0000

4.0

(1)
+26 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ASTRO2002

5.0

AST1201

5.0

AST1000

5.0

INTROASTR

5.0

AST1001

4.7

Reviews (128)
1.0
4.0
PHY2054L
Apr 21, 2004

Anderson is mean, rude, and unhelpful. He is never there during his office hours, and is very reluctant to help in class. He lectures for over an hour, and keeps you in lab for the whole 3 hrs. Avoid him at all costs.

5.0
3.0
AST2002
May 31, 2004

Dr. Anderson's class needs a bit of effort to do well in but not enough to be a bear. Classes are a bit boring (just rereading the book) but he'll answer any wuestion you have to the best of his abilities (which are very good) I would recommend him to all

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Grade: A+
Aug 22, 2004

Tests are difficult and the cheat sheets he allows do not help much. Go to the extra credit sessions and read, read, read.

5.0
2.0
PHY2054L
Grade: A
Aug 26, 2004

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHY2048L
Nov 19, 2004

Clearly answered all questions. Explains the lab procedures before we actually did them. His pre-lab quizzes are easy and straight forward. The lab reports were graded fairly. I had him first thing in the morning and he was always calm and nice and laid back and patient.

1.0
4.0
AST2002
Dec 5, 2004

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHY2048L
Dec 17, 2004

Easy A. I BSed all my labs, did bad on the quizzes, and still pulled an A-. Just participate in lab, because participation is graded. If youre lost on the lab, ask for help!!! He will do it for you!!!!!! good grade booster

5.0
5.0
ASTRONOMY
Dec 21, 2004

He really knows his stuff. Gives good powerpoint presentations. If you take good notes and come to class, you'll do well. His class does take effort however. He allows cheet sheets on the tests. His tests usually have questions on them straight from his quizzes.

1.0
1.0
AST
Jan 5, 2005

He is really boring the class is not very interesting and he is not clear with directions.

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Jan 6, 2005

He is not very personable - not interested in helping the students. His tests are inconsistant...the first one is straight from the quizzes, the second from the air; you get the idea -- if you must take it, take the lab too, I learned more from lab than lecture.

3.0
3.0
ASTRONOMY
Apr 6, 2005

lets you use a cheat sheet on tests...you click into the classes so you dont really HAAAVE to go as long as someone clicks you in...its not an easy A, but if your just concerned with passing you will def. pass here without a lot of hard work

4.0
2.0
AST2002
Apr 21, 2005

His lectures are strait from the book, most are kinda boring but a few are actually interesting. he knows what hes talking about->goes into a lot of detail, the class isnt hard if u pay attn and do the quizzes just try to stay awake!

5.0
2.0
PHY2049L
Apr 23, 2005

Not a bad professor, but the lectures last for 90 minutes and are boring. He grades the lab reports very strict, but as long as you can follow his guidelines and corrections from the 1st lab you do, you should be ok. MUST read the pre-labs to pass the quzzies. Take Patel if you can, he's good!

5.0
2.0
AST2002
May 9, 2005

great teacher! online quizes a total breeze, have to be brain dead not to ace every one cause you can take them over and over. Paper at end a little time consuming but still easy. Take with the lab cause it makes it that much easier. Plus lots of extra credit opps. Going to the lab obs. count twds.

3.0
3.0
AST
Jul 12, 2005

read the book, come to class and take notes!! Lectures are kinda boring so practice writing small for your "cheat sheet", which is allowed.

3.0
4.0
AST
Jul 12, 2005

Come to class, take notes and READ the book and you will do fine. Lectures are long and somewhat flat

2.0
3.0
AST2002
Jul 20, 2005

He is sooo boring!! The class is passable but sitting in his lectures was the worst!! Not a freindly man .. try to avoid him!!

1.0
1.0
AST2002
Grade: Fail
Aug 9, 2005

No Comments

4.0
4.0
PHYSICAIILAB
Oct 6, 2005

Sure, he's difficult, but you do learn a lot. He is a very intelligent man. At times though, the work was a bit too much.

3.0
3.0
PHY2054L
Oct 11, 2005

He def knows what he's talking about when explaining lectures and they're very informative, but boring. Every now and then he'll throw in a joke. Sometimes though, when you ask for help, he doesn't know what to do. He also drags out the lecture so you'll have JUST ENOUGH time to do the lab, so you never get out early.

3.0
5.0
AST2002
Nov 12, 2005

GO TO CLASS! He takes attendance, but you really need to listen & take notes because the tests reflect the lectures. Start your constellation project early in the semester!! Work hard in the lab. He's not a boring teacher. I'm a slacker, & even though the class is a little difficult, I'm going to get a decent grade. I'd reccomend this class to you.

2.0
2.0
PHY2054L
Dec 15, 2005

He's total jerk and doesn't explain anything if you ask a question. Avoid taking this lab if you can.

3.0
4.0
AST2002
Dec 22, 2005

the entire class is practically online. Lectures are incredibally boring. The hardest part is the final and midterm, and if you cram for both of them you should be fine, use the astronomy place quizzes. I only went to class 5 times not including the final and mid term and still got a B.

3.0
1.0
AST2002
Apr 12, 2006

Very easy course, if you can learn from reading the book no need for lecture.

2.0
2.0
AST2002
Apr 25, 2006

The lecture is a complete and total waste of time, you would be better off simply reading the book on your own. Anderson does a good job of sticking to the material in the book, but as a physicist he's not the most personable person.

3.0
3.0
AST2002
May 2, 2006

He is not a bad teacher, this class is just incredibly boring. It was only hard because the material was impossible to be interested in. There are a lot of little assignments that aren't worth much but do them because they will help your grade. He also majorly curves the midterm and final.

5.0
3.0
PHY2054L
Jul 4, 2006

He gives long explanations but at least you know what you're doing, and he speaks plain english. Expects you to have some idea of what's going on if you want his help with something, and he can be quite blunt. Definately knows his stuff.

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Aug 10, 2006

Holy crap did I think of some creative excuses to get out of this class. And on the rare occasion that I acutally did go to class, I only found comfort in sleeping on my friend's shoulder or pulling out my cell phone to play the weakest link. Save yourself, take something else.

3.0
2.0
AST2020
Oct 3, 2006

He is a good teacher, just that it gets very boring sometimes with the way he speaks. Very monotone, seems like he isnt very interested in teaching the material during class. Cant really avoid this class because he is the only one that teaches it. Class is fairly easy besides that.

1.0
4.0
AST2002
Oct 23, 2006

SUCKS! He doesn't teach

2.0
4.0
ASTRO0000
Nov 7, 2006

nice guy...its just that he breathes sleeping gas.

2.0
3.0
AST8907
Nov 29, 2006

Lord have mercy on your soul if you take this class! DON'T TAKE THIS CLASS. HE'S BORING. MONOTONOUS... Most of us bring books or laptops or other homework to do during class. You get a crib sheet for tests. Sign in is the same time every class so you never really have to go but for a second to sign in... or you can jsut have someone do it for you.

4.0
3.0
AST0000
Nov 29, 2006

He is a very smart man but his knowledge of stars did not seem to rub off on me. If you have interest in Astronomy, you will probably love the class. If it is out of requirement, I'm not so sure. Do you BB quizzes, sign in as much as possible and pray before the exam and you'll be fine!

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Nov 29, 2006

He was not a good teacher.. It was very hard to follow because he was soo boring. The tests were really hard and he is not very clear.

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Nov 30, 2006

THE most boring class i have ever taken, attendance is mandatory but doesn't count much. he makes it easy to skip because the lectures and assignments were all online, and he sent email updates about things. tests are kind of hard but you get a cheat sheet.

2.0
3.0
AST2002
Nov 30, 2006

NONONONO!!!! he is terrible.. is not helpful if you dont understand!! stay away!! Yes you can use a cheat sheet... he doesnt tell you what to put on it and his review sheets are the farthest thing than what is on the test... NOO

3.0
3.0
ASTRONOMY
Dec 3, 2006

he is boring...but NOT that bad. he lets you take quizzes online as many times as you want (and thats 15% of your grade). Lots to do, but overall an easy class to BS your way through. dont buy the book or go to lectures...switch off signing in your friends. just do the BB quizzes, and CA's, and your constellation projects and you should be fine

4.0
3.0
PHYIILAB
Dec 19, 2006

Dr. Anderson was a good lab instructor. He knows his physics. And you can actually understand him, unlike some other lab lectures in the physics department.

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Dec 30, 2006

I feel bad for the guy; a degree from Harvard landed him in Jax. Still, he seems to just be going through the motions of his job.

4.0
2.0
AST2001
Jan 23, 2007

Really an easy class just gotta show up curves the test takes attendance at the end of class so its ok to be late the quizzes on blackboard you can take them as many times as u want

3.0
4.0
AST2002
Apr 9, 2007

NOT GOOD!!! Yeah the quizzes are on BB and you can take them over and over, but to get 100% takes HOURS! Lectures have nothing to do with what is on the quizzes! We were lectured on chap 3, but getting quizzed on chapter 7! The guy loves his astronoomy, but is a terrible teacher! Went to harvard but teaches at UNF?!?...ugh

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Apr 25, 2007

Two words: Snooze Fest...his lectures are SOOO boring!! he lets you take quizzes online as many times as you want and he curves the tests...but really hes soooo boring and he trys to make jokes..that AREN't funny...if you want to be bored out of your mind Take ANDERSON!

4.0
3.0
AST2002
May 5, 2007

Professor is good, but class is boring. Do the online quizzes and study for the tests some and you'll get an A.

5.0
3.0
AST2002
Jul 25, 2007

The negative comments have been from a bunch of whiney babies who don't care about learning anything but just want to get their credits in and MAYBE improve their GPA. He's always been available during office hours and seems to really appreciate it if you show some interest in the subject. I would recommend him if you have any interest in AST.

5.0
1.0
AST2002
Jul 26, 2007

I honestly don't know how people think he is a bad professor. AST2002 is really easy and Anderson is great at explaining the concepts. People who fail it must never open the book and think they can coast through it like they do through life.

5.0
2.0
AST2002
Jul 27, 2007

Really great professor. Although he has little patience for students who put forth no effort, although I don't blame him. For people who comment that he went to Harvard but teaches at UNF, if you put forth any effort you'd know he is from Jax. These are the same people who complain about their grades, but don't put any effort into that either.

5.0
2.0
AST2002
Aug 7, 2007

This class was great. As long as you showed up, took notes (or studied the ones he posts online), read your book, and asked questions, he made it easy to actually learn the material (as in learn, not just memorize). He showed plenty of enthusiasm for this subject. If he's this good at teaching astronomy I can't wait to take him for physics!

5.0
3.0
AST2002
Aug 13, 2007

Dr. Anderson is really invested in your success if you are. If you think you can coast through with no outside study, forget it. You have to be willing to do your part. There is alot of material to cover, so if you are not familiar with the subject it can be daunting. He does curve exams, which is very helpful. He is very knowledgable.

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Aug 16, 2007

prof. anderston was a bit dry, but the topic is interesting. if taking this class take the lab with lawrence mao. i never went to lecture and still earned an A because of the lab. i also earned all the extra credit in the labs. the crib sheets helped during the tests and be sure to do all the little assignments cause they help your grade a lot.

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Oct 25, 2007

I thought this class was extremely boring. I hated going to class but always did because attendence counts! You cant take the quizzes as many times as you want but it takes a while...I actually understood the concepts more when I read the book than when he taught them in class. Midterm was hard, review was very broad. Not a big fan of Anderson.

1.0
5.0
PHY2049
Nov 7, 2007

donot take lab with this crazy S.O.B. laods of useless graphs. You will probably die listening to his monotonous voice.

4.0
3.0
ASTSECT
Dec 6, 2007

Every class is super boring, but attendance only counts as 3% of your grade so i usually didn't go. Almost everything is online submission which is convenient.The project was easy too. The hardest part about the class is the tests, and they count as 65% of your grade, so if you plan to take his class spend alot of time studying. overall nice guy ju

4.0
2.0
PHY2049
Dec 14, 2007

This guy is probably the hardest lab teacher at UNF. His methods are "unusual". He gives you the lab materials online a week in advance. His quizzes are fairly straightforward. His lectures are REALLY BORING! He won't help you during lab unless you ask him to, and even then it will still be minimal assistance. Overall if you can avoid him do.

3.0
3.0
AST2002
Jan 2, 2008

OMG most boring class ever. Attendence counts but I hardly attended because it was so boring. Online quizzes suck. Exams were pretty tough even though you're allowed cheat sheets. Useless if you don't know anything about this subject. I suggest you take another science if possible. Not easy!

1.0
5.0
AST1001
Jan 8, 2008

I absolutely despised the way that this man taught intro to astronomy. he is a quantum physics professor trying to teach astronomy, which made it 10x harder than it should have been. He was difficult to understand, and i often found myself getting frustrated during lectures not only becuase of his monotonal voice,but his biased opinions.DO NOT TAKE

2.0
5.0
AST2002
Feb 19, 2008

Boring class, boring teacher. Rude and not very helpful.

2.0
2.0
AST2002
Apr 18, 2008

You can tell this guy is very smart. He went to Harvard! Unfortunately that's the problem. This class seems to low leveled for him so it wasn't very interesting. He's very monotone making it pretty boring. Online quizzes every few weeks. Lets you use cheat sheet for tests. Just bring a laptop and chill in the back of the class playing games. =D

1.0
5.0
AST2002
Apr 24, 2008

AVOID THIS TEACHER AT ALL COST.... ALL YOUR GRADE CONSISTS OF IS THE MID TERM AND THE FINAL WHICH ARE HARD.... THINKS HE IS THE FUNNIEST GUY ON EARTH.... AND VERY CONSEDED!!!!! AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!!!

2.0
3.0
AST2002
May 27, 2008

This class is not very hard. The one thing i regret is attending class as much as i did. It was a waist of time to attend class and just screw around on the computer the whole time. It was very hard to stay focused on his lectures so my recommendation is to read the text and not go to lecture, maybe pick up some EC by going to lab observations.

3.0
3.0
AST2002
Sep 17, 2008

Can be a little obtuse and long winded at times. Tries to have fun with the course, and has an obvious love for the subject matter. I think his course honestly boils down to if you care to learn astronomy or not. If you care to, he's great. It you want an easy class because of UNF credit requirements in science, its not a "sleep through it" course.

2.0
4.0
ASTRO1234
Sep 30, 2008

For the love of GOD! If you want your sanity then choose another professor! I have never ever, ever, EVER had a class as boring as this class. Professor Anderson's lectures make me feel like killing myself.

3.0
4.0
AST2002
Oct 23, 2008

TEST ARE EXTREMLY HARD!!!

2.0
5.0
ASTRO2002
Oct 30, 2008

Oh God! He is the most boring person I have ever met. Seriously! He over complicates everything and all exams and quizzes are much too hard. Remember, he's a physicist teaching a basic level course. That's like having Einstein teaching kindergartners. My personal opinion: PASS on the professor because you probably won't pass the class.

3.0
2.0
PHY2054
Nov 9, 2008

Im taking him for physics II lab, extrememly boring lectures...lab only lasts for 3 hours, & he takes up an 1 1/2 hours lecturing which doesnt leave much time for doing the experiments, which tend to be long..very rude, dont ask questions unless you want to be yelled at...only good thing is he drops lowest quiz & report grades.

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Nov 12, 2008

His lecture is super boring, gives online quizs, while they are hard you get multiple days and unlimited attempts to pass them so really if you just try you'll get good grades. Exams are pretty easy, same stuff that was on the quiz. Just go to class and actually try instead of skipping and not studying and you'll get a A. Take with Lab it helps

2.0
5.0
AST2002
Nov 19, 2008

Lectures are boring but he takes attendance. TESTS ARE EXTREMELY HARD. read every chapter, and study really hard. only two tests. Online quiz's. Doesn't like the trial and error method. Articles you have to do. Lots of extra credit which you should do. All the little extra points with the assignments help!

3.0
4.0
AST2002
Nov 19, 2008

This is the most boring class i have ever had to sit through. i literally would drink energy drinks beforehand and still fall asleep. every class is just him doind a powerpoint lecture in this monotonous voice..... awful class, boring teacher.

5.0
4.0
AST2002
Nov 20, 2008

He makes his tests extremely hard and then curves them so the whole class does not fail. Our class average was 58% on the midterm!!! If you really enjoy astronomy then this is the class for you. He lectures straight from the book!!! If you miss class just read the book, its the same exact stuff. The class gets boring after the first week.

1.0
5.0
AST1201
Nov 20, 2008

Went to class every day, could not pay attention for the life of me! I loved Biology and stayed attention and had an A+ in the class. But he was so monotone and talked off power points, he was SO boring. Plus, his tests are WAY hard. It's not memorizing facts, you have to put what you learned to use.

4.0
4.0
AST3234
Nov 21, 2008

he has got to be the most boring professor alive. ive always been interested in astronomy but i can't pay attention at all in his lectures.

1.0
5.0
ASTRONOMY
Dec 9, 2008

avoid him at all costs. he reminds me of the teacher in ferris bueller. he's so monotone. class is super boring and tests are ridiculously hard. ive gone to most classes but i cant seem to focus at all. he graduated from harvad and expects everyone to be as smart as him. ughh. dont take him.

5.0
2.0
AST2002
Dec 17, 2008

If you want at least a B. Go to the Extra Credit observations. I did the observations and ended getting 5 points on my FINAL AVERAGE. It was the difference between a C and a B. He curves both the Midterm and Final. He is a lil boring but the class is easy. I got a D on the final and midterm, but with the EC I still got a B!!! If U try you'll pass!

3.0
5.0
AST1001
Jan 28, 2009

Very Hard test

3.0
2.0
PHYLB2049
Apr 16, 2009

Calc-Phy2 Lab: He wrote the lab manual and feels the need to explain everything down to the punctuation. Expect to spend the first hour and a half listening to him talk about what you just quizzed on and the next rushing to try to finish the lab. Overall not a bad prof but really nit picky on lab reports.

3.0
3.0
AST2002
Apr 17, 2009

Eh. I took him as a freshman and I'm a junior now. He was really super boring, so I stopped attending class after like the second week. Even so, I didn't think his tests were THAT hard. I only skimmed the notes online beforehand and made cheat sheets and I got a B in the class. I feel bad for him though. He's too smart to be teaching this class.

3.0
4.0
AST2002
May 11, 2009

Very boring, but Astronomy is not really what he is supposed to be teaching. He incorporates a lot of physics into his lectures, and his tests are tricky.

2.0
4.0
PHYL2049
Jun 17, 2009

Dr. Anderson loves taking credit for writing the physics 2 lab manual. What he doesn't tell you is that he will grade you off your lab reports for grammar, when his manual is filled with run-on sentences and grammar mistakes EVERYWHERE. He loves himself and thinks his farts don't stink because he graduated from Harvard. Needs to go somewhere else.

3.0
4.0
AST2001
Jun 24, 2009

Very boring. Had to fight to stay awake during his long monotone lectures. Only take the class if you have to.

4.0
4.0
AST2002
Jul 6, 2009

He plays a music video before each class sort of "related" to the lecture which is pretty cool and funny. The tests are kinda hard. Take the extra credit opportunities (which is going to labs when you're not in the lab) and Osceola Forest to observe. Easy to understand. He is super smart and too smart to teach this. He's a physicist i think.

5.0
3.0
AST2100
Aug 5, 2009

He's very good at explaining things, and the info can get overbearing. He is a very smart guy, and he knows his stuff. He is pretty friendly too. His tests are hard, so be sure to do all other assignments. Dark Skys at Osceola aren't bad either.

2.0
3.0
PHYL2049
Aug 8, 2009

He would give 1.5 hr lecture that is boring and useless. Is very random and overly meticulous in grading so you lose a lot of points for stupid reasons. And its hard to learn from mistakes b/c you don't receive lab reports until WEEKS later, if at all. You have to study the convoluted lab manual to do well on quizzes (which are 50% of the grade!)

5.0
3.0
AST2002
Jan 10, 2010

This class really isn't hard, but you have to attend lecture and study quite a bit to do well if you aren't familiar with the subject before going in. His grader is super hot too!

5.0
3.0
AST2002
Jan 14, 2010

While his lectures are boring, he knows his subject very well and is very willing to explain things both inside and outside the class. Def take the class with the lab, as the lab will give you a easy A and also help you understand the lecture and help get you bonus points. With all the bonus points/curves he gives out you should get a b at least!

2.0
5.0
AST1000
Feb 17, 2010

I did not like him of the class. He is rude to the students and is monotone the whole time. I would never reccomend anyone taking this class!

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Apr 6, 2010

He is extremely knowledgeable and passionate in his field. He can be a bit stern when it comes to attendence and class interuptions (as he should be). Over all the class is really interesting, but you need to be willing to put forth some effort.

4.0
3.0
PHY2054
Apr 7, 2010

He lectures a lot!! He is a really nice guy overall, and does not spoon feed answers to his students. He grades hard on lab reports, but his quizes are reasonable in compared to other phy2 lab instructors. Also provides a generous curve at the end. If your prepared to put in a little effort then take him!!

3.0
3.0
MUN2310
Apr 18, 2010

the only time I attended class was the test days. as long as you buy a used book and have everything highlighted and know everything that is highlighted, you will do fine in the class. He words test questions wierd, but they are exactly what he tells you to highlight in the book. he is not interesting at all however.

3.0
5.0
AST1000
Jun 21, 2010

Ever seen the teacher on Charlie Brown?.... Professor Anderson is the Male version of her.

1.0
3.0
AST2000
Jul 5, 2010

Very boring. Biased in his teachings and his personal opinions always crept in lessons that was not related to Astronomy. Almost went to sleep in his class on the 2nd day because of his tone of voice! You are not going to have a great class unless you make it interesting for the students and boy was he so "gray".

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Jul 14, 2010

Really boring lectures but i've learned you can't escape them in science classes. The test are hard because the material is hard. An easy B.

5.0
5.0
PHY2054
Aug 1, 2010

Dr. Anderson is very nice and always willing to help. He's probably the most fair of all UNF's Physics professors. Study your frickin ars off, and you'll probably pass.

2.0
5.0
PHY2053
Aug 4, 2010

Rude and condescending. Don't even think about asking a question because you will get the response "why don't you tell me". Has his PhD from Harvard and he's a lecturer (not a professor) at UNF...that says something right there. Just don't take Physics at UNF, I've heard horror stories of the other Physics teachers.

3.0
4.0
AST2002
Aug 12, 2010

Although well educated in his subject matter, Professor Anderson lacks teaching skills. He is very monotone and does not involve the students in his lectures, along with the material that he covered in class did not fully cover what was asked on the exams. I missed an A- by .32 points and he refused to increase my grade.

2.0
5.0
INTROASTR
Nov 24, 2010

Who is up for advanced physics in an Intro to Astronomy class?

4.0
2.0
AST2002
Dec 7, 2010

Knows his material. Lectures are boring, slept or studied for other classes while in class. Attendance counts for a small percentage of your grade. Uses Mastering Astronomy online mandatory. Don't need book if you don't mind using text from MA online. Current grade is an A with minimal effort in the class.

2.0
5.0
AST2002
Dec 13, 2010

He's a horrible teacher! Take someone else if you can. I learned everything from the lab and NOTHING from him! Stay away if you can! He'll put you to sleep unless you have a great understanding of astronomy and absolutely love it.

1.0
5.0
AST2002
Mar 30, 2011

He is a terrible professor! Don't take his class if you think astronomy will be an easier science. He makes it way harder than it needs to be, and you'll feel like you're in physics. He's monotone, rude, and a bad teacher. I wouldn't recommend his class to anyone.

4.0
4.0
PHY2049
May 4, 2011

His lab started with a quiz on the lab that day (not easy) and super boring 1.5 hour lecture. He is also unforgiving when mistakes are made in the lab report. However, he is very smart and pretty funny. I would recommend taking him if you actually want to learn something.

2.0
4.0
PHY2054
May 5, 2011

This guy is HORRIBLE!! There is a quiz every class about the lab that day which you have never heard anything about other than the lab manual you have that HE wrote. He lectures almost the entire time leaving you little time to rush through and get data. He grades the lab reports like your a physicist from Harvard (which he proudly tells you he is)

2.0
3.0
AST2002
Dec 2, 2011

Very BORING class, can talk for hours on end. Took him for Astronomy, and regretted it. HIGHLY recommend against taking this professor at all!

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Dec 8, 2011

John Anderson is a terrible professor. His powerpoints are amazingly long for the lack of content. Also expect about 30 emails a month from him about jibberish since he is too lazy to use blackboard.DO NOT TAKE ASTRONOMY!

3.0
3.0
ASTRONOM
Apr 12, 2012

His class is incredibly boring; I actually switched from astrophysics to mathematics asa major because of the discouraging effect of his class. As long as you do the homework, do your best to pay attention, and do the readings, you'll be fine grade-wise but his class is a blow to your sanity. Not the most charismatic professor.

2.0
3.0
AST2002
Apr 23, 2012

Not the best prof, he is extremely boring and not very helpful. Mastering astro screwed up on me and he didn't even try to help. Exams aren't the easiest and kinda random with material. I dont recommend him.

2.0
4.0
PHY2049
Feb 17, 2013

He lectures nearly the entire lab after you have to study like crazy to pass the quiz before he even begins the lecture. That means you are forced to rush through lab and spend the rest of the week perfecting your "Discussion Points" for your highness of Harvard. Hope you don't have a class right after because you're going to be stuck late in lab.

2.0
5.0
AST2002
Mar 30, 2013

DO NOT TAKE BASIC ASTRONOMY and think you will get an easy A, your lucky to get a C. Worst teacher ever. Covers way to much material in a monotone boring lecture, and crams it all in to only two exams. Ridiculous online astronomy program that is impossible, and a group project. Dropped this class received a 53 on my midterm even after studying alot

4.0
4.0
PHY2054L
Apr 25, 2013

If you're trying to get out of lab in less than an hour, don't take this class. However, if you would like to actually learn, he is a great professor. Lectures for first 1.5 hrs of lab, but it helps a ton! Very picky about lab reports. (Easy) quizzes before every lab. Grade: 50% quizzes, 50% lab reports. Drops lowest of each. Requires effort.

4.0
1.0
AST2002
Jul 14, 2013

He is very monotone when he lectures, however he knows his stuff. Always opportunity to receive extra credit. He is a fare professor

4.0
5.0
PHY2049L
Jul 29, 2013

Class is 3 hours long and he spends the first half speaking. I perosnally found every lab confusing as heck because there is so much info involved. You have to read the lab info packet before each class because there is a quiz on each packet every class. He is very rigorous in grading the labs. And make sure to pick reliable lab partners!

2.0
4.0
AST2002
Oct 25, 2013

Do not take this professor! He's extremely boring, and he makes Astronomy much harder than it needs to be. Mastering Astronomy homework answers can be found online but exams are difficult, even with a lot of studying.

3.0
3.0
PHY2053L
Nov 7, 2013

He knows Physics but sometimes gets carried away and incorporates physics2 into physics1 lab and makes things even moer confusing. spends more than 1/2 the class lecturing in too much detail. very tricky quizzes before every single lab and super picky grader about miniscule things. Take someone else is available.

5.0
2.0
AST2002
Jan 6, 2014

Very good professor and definitely knows his stuff! People who talk bad about him are basically right out of high school or don't try and blame it on him...He is the most organized professor I have ever had and he gives crazy amounts of extra credit and curves tests A LOT. I got a 78 on the midterm but he curved 12 points so I got a 90! Great guy!!

4.0
2.0
PHY2049L
Apr 10, 2014

Yes he is smart. Yes he has a PH.D. from Harvard. Yes he wore his Harvard sweatshirt the first day of class. The class in general in semi difficult but he demonstrates the set up before you begin working. Yes he talks for an average of 1 hour before you start. Extremely slow at grading things. But overall a cool guy. An A is not hard to get.

4.0
3.0
PHY2048L
Grade: A
Jul 16, 2014

Make sure you study the material before class because there will be a quiz the moment class begins. When doing lab reports don't mess up with sig-figs because you'll be marked down big time. Anderson is very clear about what is required during lab and an overall nice guy. Would recommend.

5.0
3.0
PHY2053
Grade: B
Aug 24, 2014

Teacher adjusts syllabus to student's needs. Makes great examples and involves students in class. PowerPoints are amazing study guides. Tests are hard. Grading is fair. TAKE HIM :)

5.0
3.0
PHY2053
Grade: A
Jan 3, 2015

He's a great teacher but his exams are extremely challenging. You can write notes on both sides of a piece of paper for formulas and example problems. I ended up with an A. There tends to be a large scale. My highest exam score out of all the exams was a C before the scale.

3.0
5.0
PHY2048L
Oct 14, 2015

My lab is from 1:00-3:50pm, and he lectures (on stuff we either leanred in the lecture or stuff we don't need to know, such as what a plumbob is) until 2:00 or 2:30 pm. Labs are confusing, and he isn't always able to help; sometimes does not fully understand the labs. He is extremely strict on grading, especially on sig-figs. Not recommending.

5.0
4.0
AST2002
Grade: A+
Oct 11, 2017
Would take again

Professor Anderson is an incredibly smart human being. He went to Harvard and really proves that in the way he speaks and discusses topics relevant to the course, Intro to Astronomy. He provides extra credit but does not grade. He has an assigned student grader who grades in a fair amount of time. He really makes class enjoyable and interesting!

Clear grading criteria
GROUP PROJECTS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
AST2000
Grade: A+
Oct 17, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He's okay. He covers the material he is supposed to in a timely manner. His voice is a bit monotone, it puts people's attention to their laptops or phones because of this. Very well educated man, just needs to spice up his class a bit.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
4.0
AST2002
Grade: B
Oct 25, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Educated teacher but makes a class like Basic Astronomy not basic and makes it way harder than the class needs to be! Waits till the the last second of class to dismiss every time and burdens students with tough projects that take up way too much time and is useless. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND. Sucks that he is the only one who teaches it.

Skip class? You won't pass.
SO MANY PAPERS
GROUP PROJECTS
4.0
4.0
AST2002
Grade: B
Nov 3, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Knowledgeable on the subjects he teaches, but he's super lecture heavy, on that end. He can't seem to engage the class too much and because of that it causes alot of students to kinda keep their noses behind their devices. His tests are pretty brutal, even though you get a cheat sheet for the mid term and final (2). Attendance is only 3% of grade

Respected
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
5.0
AST2002
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 14, 2017
Wouldn't take again

SO BORING. I try to pay attention, but I fall asleep. Astronomy is such an interesting topic, but i cannot pay attention for the life of me. If you dont have to take this class dont. JA is a cool dude & has a good sense of humor, but the class is so boring & the tests are very hard & doesnt even follow the study guide to the T. just dont do it.

Respected
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
1.0
AST2002
Grade: A+
Nov 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Anderson is a nice guy and has a sense of humor, but his lectures are extremely boring, which is sad because astronomy is such an amazing topic. If you have a sufficient grasp of astronomy, then you can pass this class and not even have to pay attention. Tests are super easy and the homework is a joke. You'll also do a trivial group project.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
GROUP PROJECTS
4.0
3.0
PHY2048L
Grade: A
Apr 9, 2018
Would take again

DONT LET THE RBF FOOL YOU. He is actually pretty cool and willing to help you with whatever question you have. Tough grader, but its all by the rubric. Very organized and regimented. Grade is updated every week.

3.0
4.0
AST1001
Grade: C
May 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

His exams are hard, you got to study real hard to pass.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
EXTRA CREDIT
4.0
4.0
AST2002
Apr 8, 2019
Would take again

Anderson is a great professor with great knowledge in his field. His lectures can get a bit boring some days, but he is very attentive to your emails and messages on Canvas (even on the weekends!). Attendance is part of your grade- however, think of it as a way to get easy points, it can make a difference. He also has extra credit opportunities.

4.0
3.0
AST2002
Grade: B+
Apr 16, 2019
Would take again

You have a group project so make sure to form a group and start as soon as possible. There are online assignments so I suggest you pay attention and read the book to do the homework. He only has two test. the midterm and the final. You do get cheat sheets for both tests with whatever you want written on it. You should attend class its worth 3%

Group projects
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
PHY2049L
Grade: A+
Apr 21, 2020
Would take again

Love this guy. He's way too smart and will go off on things that are beyond the scope of your learning but tries to help in every way he can. He gave us 100s on the first two labs and we worked in large groups bc he didn't want to grade a lot. He hasn't graded any other labs and the class ends this week but he said if we tried we would be fine. lol

Respected
Accessible outside class
Group projects
1.0
5.0
AST2002
Apr 30, 2020
Wouldn't take again

horrible professor He is such a tough grader and his exams are horrible and so hard The study guide is useless because none of the things there will show on the exam I dont recommend taking this class with him

Test heavy
Group projects
Tough grader
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

91%

Textbook Required

85%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

92% confidence
Based on 14 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (5)
A (4)
B (3)
Grade Distribution
A(9)B(3)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 16 reported grades
A+: 5
A: 4
B: 3
Fail: 1
Common Tags
GROUP PROJECTS (4)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Respected (3)
Group projects (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (2)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (2)
Clear grading criteria (1)
SO MANY PAPERS (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.16 avg change
Oct
Nov
Apr
May
Apr
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

AST2100

5.0

(1)

PHY2049L

4.5

(4)

PHY2048L

4.2

(5)

PHYSICAIILAB

4.0

(1)

AST0000

4.0

(1)
+26 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ASTRO2002

5.0

AST1201

5.0

AST1000

5.0

INTROASTR

5.0

AST1001

4.7

Similar Professors