3.9

John Beaudoin

Philosophy - Northern Illinois University

3.9
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
79%
Would Retake
104
Reviews
3.9
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
3.7
Helpful
4.1
Clarity

79%

Would Retake

104

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

50

4

28

3

15

2

6

1

5

What Students Say

His lectures are great and make sense if you pay attention

PHIL231 - 5.0 rating

His lectures and notes are great, and if you try, you pass

PHILOSOPHY231 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

40%

Textbook Required

74%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 31 grades
Most common grades:
A (16)
B (5)
A+ (4)
Grade Distribution
A(20)B(5)C(3)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(2)
Based on 33 reported grades
A: 16
B: 5
A+: 4
C+: 1
Common Tags
Graded by few things (7)
Test heavy (6)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Get ready to read (5)
Clear grading criteria (5)
Lecture heavy (5)
Amazing lectures (5)
EXTRA CREDIT (4)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.01 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
May
Jan
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

231

5.0

(4)

PHIL

5.0

(1)

PHIL231170

5.0

(1)

INTROPHIL

5.0

(1)

PHIL370

5.0

(1)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

MORALISSUES

5.0

INTROPHIL

4.0

PHIL101

3.8

PHIL105

3.2

PHIL370

3.0

Reviews (104)
5.0
2.0
231
Sep 26, 2004

I really liked the way he organized his lectures. He is very clear and the class structure was simple.

4.0
3.0
PHIL103
Oct 1, 2004

Wow, this guy really did know his stuff, but he never smiled. He was the most depressed-looking guy that I knew. Very monotone. He rtaught well and the class was cool, but... Smile More, John!

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Nov 12, 2004

Very good teacher. Explains things very clearly, makes great points, his lectures are very well organized. Obviously knows his stuff. I feel sorry that students don't pay more attention, he's a great teacher and deserves having a class that really wants to learn. Great teacher.

4.0
2.0
PHIL103
Nov 14, 2004

Class was very easy if you went to class. Not very demanding. Only hard part is the man has no expression whatsoever, monotone, never moves a facial muscle.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Nov 16, 2004

not diff at all, show up, take good notes, review for 1/2 hour night before test, and you will be fine. very clear and straightforward, easy to grasp + intersteing.could use a little more expression, dosent usually look like hes having a lot of fun, but no reaseon why u cant get an a in this class.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Nov 16, 2004

awesome instuctor!!! he really knows the material. he lectures on everything you need for the tests, plus the class is curved. very easy if you go to class or get notes. it was really funny to see him hold in smiles! let lose sometime

5.0
2.0
231
Aug 30, 2005

i love his teaching style he is very funny, he knows his stuff and he keeps you laughing. i love the way he aways tries to hide his smile. he wants to stay professional but sometimes we made him laugh. it was fun.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Aug 31, 2005

oh my god. he is awesome. just attend the class and you will be fine!

4.0
2.0
PH231
Sep 2, 2005

seems like a boring teacher, but once your in his class for a while, you learn he can be ****ing hilarious and overall he is a very clear and intelligent guy.

5.0
1.0
PHIL
Grade: A
Sep 10, 2005

Awesome!

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Sep 15, 2005

At first he seems boring and too straight forward. But you realize he really knows the material and as time goes on he is funny as****. He throws in odd comments and only gets a little smirk on his face while the class is cracking up. the material is interesting and hes a really good teacher.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Grade: B
Oct 4, 2005

this is the one class i enjoy going to! he's a great teacher and class is so interesting and funny, i love it! very very easy as well! :-)

4.0
5.0
MORALISSUES
Nov 12, 2005

John is a great guy and his classes are interesting. If you go to class, youre basically guaranteed an A.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Nov 15, 2005

His abilities went mostly to his knowledge and less to his interpersonal skills. He's extremely smart, clear, concise... but he'll only crack a smile once in a while... and it's usually when someone's making an idiot out of themselves in front of the class. I liked this professor a LOT.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Nov 17, 2005

This class is a lot of fun. I recommend it to everyone. As long as you go to class you'll get atleast a B. He comes off as a jerk but he knows what he's talking about and he's good at teaching it!

2.0
1.0
PHIL170
Mar 31, 2006

Very Very Dry. Does not interact with students or even seem interested in them. You can learn more about world religions from looking through an encyclopedia. An easy A but if you really want to learn about religions do not take this class.

5.0
2.0
PHIL170
Apr 13, 2006

He is super dry and writes everything out on the board. He also uses some power point but does not rely on it like some professors do.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Apr 17, 2006

Easy A if you attend class- take notes. Everything is on the board. Not biased at all and makes it great to learn.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Apr 20, 2006

He might come off as dry, but in reality he has a great sense of humor which is only tripled in effect due to how rarely he shows it. His classes are,"straight to the point", but I think if people were less intimidated by his serious expression (he rarely smiles,but its a contagious smile), class would have many more discussions. Excellent teacher.

4.0
2.0
PHILOSPHY
May 4, 2006

He is nice. His exams are fair. The true false questions are tricky. He is a genius on the material. He knows almost everything regarding the material. He never misses a day of class. Everything he writes on the board are on his exams. Just study the notes and you will pass his exams. He does not take attendance. Never use info from the text book.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Jun 27, 2006

i had him my freshman year. he was funny and his teaching methods are great. i didn't even have to read the book and i got a B. he is hilrarious, unconventional, and somewhat controversial. not afraid to speak his mind and he is not afraid to let you speak yours.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231170
Jul 30, 2006

he is a very blah kind of guy, but everything is straight to the point. test questions come directly from notes that he writes on the board in class...you pretty much knew exactly what to expect and had great notes to study from. i liked him pretty well so i actually took two classes with him.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Nov 10, 2006

Nice guy! He speaks in a dull, dry tone but clear. He teaches some interesting topics which will keep you focused in class. His exams are smooth because he curves them. Notes are very detailed. I recommend him!

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Dec 31, 2006

I'd have to say he is dull and dry, but his material is very clear. Lots of notes, but he covers everything and the exams are very simple. One of my best prof. of the semester.

3.0
2.0
PHIL231
Mar 10, 2007

I find this class interesting and he makes me want to come to class. You need to take good notes because the fill-in-the-blank tests are completely from the notes and lecture.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Apr 17, 2007

I liked this class a lot!!! He seemed kind of boring at first but has his funny moments. The class was really interesting. It makes you think a lot. He was a really good teacher.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Apr 22, 2007

Very good teacher!! Explains things throughly without putting his opinion in it. The test are so easy just make sure you go to class and take notes! Very interesting class!

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
May 5, 2007

Great teacher and great class. Very interesting material and the notes are very helpful. The tests are primarily based on the notes, so it's important to go to class or borrow them from someone else. He presents the material in an unbiased tone. Highly recommended, one of the best classes I've taken!

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
May 7, 2007

Excellent teacher. He writes all of the notes on the board. Everything from the tests are from those notes.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Nov 5, 2007

Good teacher. Everything that is on the test in written on the board during his lectures. This was one of my easiest classes. Go to class, take notes, read over your notes before the exam and you could EASILY walk out of the class with an A. I totally recommend him!!

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Dec 4, 2007

If you are considering taking PHIL 231, make sure it is with Beaudoin!! His notes are a little disjointed, but he gets his point across. His tests are fill in the blank, multiple choice, and a few short answer. They are fairly easy (they cover exactly what you cover in class). He is the only teacher you should consider.

4.0
1.0
PHIL231
Dec 30, 2007

This was a great Gen. Ed. I found his humor hilarious once I got used to it. Class talks about current topics. It should be known that he makes it a point to win all class discussions. Great class, you just have to go. Defiantly recommend this teacher and this class

4.0
4.0
PHIL105
May 1, 2008

He's a good teacher but the class will be kind of hard if philosophy is not your strongest subject. All the notes are on the board and the test come directly from them. There are only five tests, and no final.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Jul 11, 2008

He is dry and does not seem to have much of a personality, but is overall a great teacher. as long as you go to class and study, you will do fine. the topics are interesting and kept everyone in class interested

4.0
3.0
PHIL231
Dec 22, 2008

He's dry but like's to make jokes every blue moon, test are okay,covers exactly what was said in class, he never actually tells you his opinion on cases he have more of a moral discussion/debate with the class to hear our opinions. Overall nice guy class is not hard just show up and study.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Apr 2, 2009

He is very intelligent and his class is extremely easy but entertaining. His attitude is hilarious. He's a great professor.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
May 2, 2009

Seemed like he started to have more of a sense of humor towards the end, class would have been more appealing if he had it the whole semester. Good teacher though, understands the material and makes students think for themselves. Go to class and do the study guide. Very straight forward. Tests are based on lectures.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
May 3, 2009

very straightforward: notes/lectures = test. if you miss lecture you can copy the notes in office hours. he seemed kind of annoyed with the class but it's understandable considering the entire class is standing there blank when he's attempting to spark an articulate discussion.

5.0
1.0
PHIL170
Nov 11, 2009

Tests are straight from the notes so plan on going to class every day. No curve-balls though, very straightfoward teaching and on tests.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Nov 29, 2009

great teacher. once you pick up on his sense of humor, he is pretty amusing. every test question comes straight from his notes/lectures, so you have to go to class. way better than the other PHIL 231 teachers from what i've heard.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Dec 8, 2009

Easy class. What he wrote on the board, it was on the test. if he didn't put it on the board, it wasnt on the test. Make sure you show up to class to get the notes. he is very meticulous about his grading on the tests. so make sure you cover everything you can think of.

1.0
4.0
PHIL231
Feb 4, 2010

no comment

3.0
5.0
PHIL105
Oct 13, 2010

Do not take this class. If you don't want to have your GPA lowered avoid at all costs. Not only is he monotone but he acts like its elementry school and assigns seating without even giving us a warning to be quiet. worst teacher i have ever had. his test r ridiculous he doesn't even include a word bank on his exams for fill in the blank. wat a joke

3.0
2.0
PHIL231
Nov 23, 2010

I dont understand why the people voting him bad below me are in college. He is one of the easiest teachers here. He curves the tests so much that a 65% might be a B. Go to class and study for about an hour or two before the test and you will surly get an A

3.0
1.0
PHIL231
Dec 8, 2010

VERY INTERESTING CLASS. TOPICS WILL MAKE YOU NOT MIND ATTENDING CLASS. HOWEVER, HIS HANDWRITING SUCKS!!!!! HE DOES NOT USE BLACKBOARD N HE WRITES EVERYTHING ON THE BOARD. BUT JUST SIT IN FRONT OF CLASS. TEST ARE PRETTY EZ IF YOU GO TO CLASS. IF YOU MISS YOU CAN COPY NOTES DURING OFFICE HRS. NICE CURVE AND EASY 1PG PAPER. 6 EZ EXAMS. I RECOMMEND HIM

2.0
2.0
PHIL101
May 3, 2011

Doesn't write clearly enough to be read easily. Teaches like he doesn't want to be there. First day- walked in and started teaching. I still don't know his name from anything other than my schedule. No one shows up to class. He's kind of a ****.

3.0
3.0
PHIL105
May 30, 2011

grading scale is pretty fair, tests are kind of hard. go to class and do the exercises in the book when he does them in class. there are 5 pop quizzes and 5 non-cumulative exams. class is kind of boring though.

5.0
4.0
INTROPHIL
Sep 20, 2011

During my time in undergrad I took a number of courses with Mr. Beaudoin. He is one of NIU's treasures, and everyone ripping the man apart is simply admitting that they never tried in any of his courses. He is helpful, courteous, and always willing to listen. He is also brilliant.

5.0
3.0
PHIL231
Nov 2, 2011

I definitely find him harsh and boring but he's so smart it's intimidating. He uses his office hours for people who miss his class notes or tests. Ask him something you're not understanding, and he'll help you out. Don't judge him!

1.0
5.0
PHIL231
Nov 16, 2011

i recomend everyone to not take this class. my only bad grade i had. i got a d in this class. i pulled numerous all nighters for the tests but he re words them and out of the 6 tests we take i never got anything higher than a 58 %. DONT TAKE it you cant read his handwriting he never even smiles. hated the class

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Nov 17, 2011

Professor Beaudoin is a really good professor&I liked his class. He's extremely intelligent and makes the class a lot of fun, but GO TO CLASS. He puts nothing on blackboard and EVERYTHING on the test is from his notes. If you study your notes before the test you should be fine.

2.0
4.0
PHIL231
Nov 29, 2011

I like the grading scale, only based on 6 tests. But he is very boring and doesn't seem to care about the students. and get used to writing, probably had 2 or 3 pages of notes every class.

1.0
5.0
PHIL231
Nov 29, 2011

The worst teacher i have had since i have been at NIU. The first day of class he came in and didn't say a word, just started writing on the board for everyone to copy. I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND this class to anyone or this professor. He seems like every day he has no compassion for his job or for the students that surround him on a daily basis.

5.0
3.0
PHIL231
Nov 30, 2011

One of the most boring, monotone professors I have ever come across. He doesn't say a word to you unless it is in regards to what he is writing on the board. However, it is a pretty easy class. Everything you need to know, he writes on the board. Go to class, study a little bit and you will surely pass.

3.0
2.0
PHIL231
Dec 6, 2011

The notes he puts up on the board are the tests, which is good. But he is the most unfriendly guy I've ever seen. The TA's are the ones who grade your paper, which could be good or bad.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Dec 26, 2011

I loved Beaudoin's class- it was interesting and he explained the material well. He was a little intimidating, didn't seem very happy most days. However, the class is a good way to learn the philosophy basics. I would recommend this professor to those interested in philosophy.

5.0
3.0
PHIL370
Mar 17, 2012

I loved him, he is really passionate about the course material making it sound so interesting, if you pay attention and study for the exams you'll do great. he writes very fast and messy but if you don't understand what he said/wrote you can always ask him after class. If you go see him you can ask him about ANY problem you might have.

3.0
3.0
PHIL231
Apr 10, 2012

Mr. Beaudoin seems very intimidating at first, but he's really nice. He seems like a younger version of Mr. Burns from the Simpsons, but he's a good teacher. You learn a lot from him, don't be scared to speak up. He likes when people actually talk, because usually no one does. Actually READ out of his course pack, it is helpful and easy to read.

4.0
2.0
PHIL231
Jun 14, 2012

There were just 6 tests and the final is not cumulative. His handwriting is not very good but if you ask him what a work is he will tell you. As long as you take notes and go to class, you should get an easy B. He made he class kind of interesting.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Oct 16, 2012

Dr. Beaudoin is very intelligent and he increased my interest in the subject. It usually seems like he is being inconvenienced by teaching this course - I have a feeling he'd rather be teaching more advanced students who are actually PHIL majors. However, there are times when he is very funny. I recommend him.

5.0
3.0
PHIL105
Dec 5, 2012

This professor is one of the best professors at NIU. He is extremely helpful. Although he does not make attendance mandatory he does notice who comes and who doesn't. He likes when students speak up in class. He seems intimidating at first but once you get to know him he is very helpful. Read all of the material because that is the exam.

5.0
3.0
PHIL105
Mar 23, 2013

This professor was very thorough. I was uninterested in philosophy when I singed up for the course I just took it as an elective but he made the subject matter very engaging.

5.0
2.0
PHIL231
Apr 11, 2013

He is not very engaging in class, and he rather just lecture but he does provide you with a booklet of notes and goes through a lot of questions he created to help you understand the material. The tests are all formatted the same and if you go to class and pay attention you should do well. If you are interested in philosophy take him!!

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
May 7, 2013

i love this guy! He is very eager to teach and when students interact he goes toe to toe with you. Just to make sure you are understanding and can support what your saying. He is the best Philosophy teacher Ive taken him twice

3.0
3.0
PHIL238
May 20, 2013

Sometimes it feels like his class goes by so slow because of his monotone voice. Do not take out your phone in his class, HE WILL YELL AT YOU. Overall I really did like this class. The subjects he taught were VERY interesting. I studied A LOT and couldn't get anything higher than a B on his test, which was irritating.

4.0
4.0
PHIL105
Jun 3, 2013

Got a C on the first test and screw everything up. Got all As after that and still couldn't get the grade back to an A because of the poor grading system. I would recommend him because he is a good teacher but you should be ready to work really hard if you want an A. No extra credit opportunity.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Oct 3, 2013

I would love to step into this John's mind for a day. He is incredibly intelligent about the subject and wrote the book for the class. Attendance isn't mandatory but I HIGHLY recommend you go because the material can be confusing. Tests are easy if you study and go to class. No homework, no extra credit. Very helpful outside of class.

5.0
3.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
May 10, 2014

The class was pretty challenging, but John made the class easier to follow by going through the book with us during class. He actually wrote the book, which was very interesting. The material was kinda hard, but he used a lot of diagrams to help us remember. I liked the grading scale, 5 exams and 4 quizzes with the 2 lowest dropped.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Jan 6, 2015

Some of the topics can be difficult to understand, but if you go in for extra help he is willing to do anything to help! He is one of those professors who is so intelligent that it sometimes intimidates students, but nonetheless, he's very nice! He makes diagrams which help a lot. Assigns a few chapters of reading every day. Go to class!

5.0
3.0
231
Feb 14, 2015

Four words, He is the best

2.0
5.0
PHIL105
Grade: C+
Apr 7, 2015

This class was horrible. It's supposed to be a 100level class, but it doesn't seem like it is. You only take pop quizzes and tests in this class. If you miss a day of class it is super hard to catch up. I woukd never take this class again.

5.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY231
Grade: A
Apr 8, 2015

He has been the best and most knowledgeable professor I have had the pleasure of having at NIU thus far. The class is designed for you to have to study a lot, but he makes it make sense. Also, it is really helpful that he wrote the text, as the tests are modeled after the readings. His lectures and notes are great, and if you try, you pass.

5.0
1.0
PHIL231
Grade: A
Apr 9, 2015

First off, Beaudoin is hilarious. He is clearly shy and doesn't make much eye contact but is actually very nice. He gets less shy as time goes on. His lectures are great and make sense if you pay attention. It is crucial to show up because his notes are everything you need for the test. He is easily the best professor I have had at Northern.

5.0
3.0
231
Grade: Not sure yet
May 5, 2015

He is such an amazing professor. His tests are hard though compared to the other professors, however, if you are interested to learn about different topics in Philosophy then you must take him. He is the best professor I have ever seen. I got inspired by his amazing lectures, and he made me think about minoring in philosophy. He is the BEST.

5.0
3.0
PHIL105
Nov 29, 2015

Professor Beaudoin is the best professor I had. If you want to learn, take his class.

2.0
4.0
PHIL105
Grade: F
May 24, 2016

I had a really hard time with the class. He wasn't the most approachable and taught at a higher level that was tough for me to follow. He was a difficult teacher to learn from if you have NO background in Phil (like i did)

5.0
4.0
PHIL353
Grade: A
Sep 2, 2016
Would take again

I have enjoyed both classes I have taken with him. Everything is very straightforward, which is nice with a Philosophy professor. He does not seem approachable, but he is. You can tell he is very shy, but he is actually very nice, knowledgable, and his lectures are entertaining and witty. Ask questions if needed because he is very helpful.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
3.0
4.0
PHIL101
Apr 26, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Had this class been advertised as a 200 I would have understood the rigor, but this class was insane. There was a ton of information covered, relatively in depth, and the quizzes were very specific. There were only 600 points (5 tests and one paper) and no extra credit available. The paper was way more intense than anything else we did all semester

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
PHIL103
May 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I took this class online hoping it would be an "easy" 100 level class. It's not. Grades are solely based on 6 exams, and the exams (in my opinion) are difficult, even when you are reading, using the textbook and reading the powerpoints. If you like philosophy, sure take it. But if you're looking for an easy elective, stay away

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
PHIL105
Grade: B
Aug 27, 2018
Would take again

Very fair, clear grading criteria. You must read and do exercises and you will do fine. No extra credit but you cannot do badly on exams if you study. He wrote the textbook and the readings are really interesting, they really make you think which is the name of the class..I would take him again.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
1.0
5.0
PHIL103
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Oct 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFESSOR HE SUCKS! I REPEAT DO NOT TAKE HIM I wanted to take an easy class and I thought how hard can an intro class be? IT WAS HORRIBLE. I withdrew from the course because I knew I would get a C IF I WAS LUCKY! He makes you feel dumb for not having background info on philosophy SAVE YOURSELF

1.0
5.0
PHIL101
Grade: C
Jan 10, 2019
Wouldn't take again

This was an intro to Philosophy class and it was taught like a 400 level class. Plus, he is very unapproachable and well, scary. If I didn't have a TA in that class I would have failed. Only grades you get are for you exams which are ridiculously hard and one paper. More than half my class failed, I passed with a C. Lowest grade I had.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
PHIL105
Sep 3, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He was a professor but DAMN was his class hard. This was an intro philosophy class, felt like it was a 400 level class. Tests and quizzes were the only thing that counted. If you take this class with this professor, be ready! GO TO CLASS!!! You will have a hard time passing if you do not.

Lots of homework
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2020
Would take again

Good professor. He can be a bit blunt, but he is easy to understand, explains things well, and has a good sense of humor. The class is reasonably difficult. Not too hard, but also not too easy!! The exams and quizzes are unfortunately the only grades, so STUDY!!! Do the exercises in the book, go to class, a small bit of studying, and you'll be fine

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Beware of pop quizzes
4.0
3.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
Aug 22, 2020
Would take again

He knows a lot about the topic. He might come off as unapproachable and scary but he is a decent professor. Very organized and he always checks if students understand the lessons. He did his part in the lecture really well but students have to read and try as well.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
May 4, 2021
Would take again

I really enjoyed taking this class! You do need to take notes on the readings he gives you as well as on the lectures, but if you actually discuss the material with friends and really try to understand your morals, youll be fine. I recommend this class FOR SURE

Get ready to read
4.0
2.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2021
Would take again

Grades are only made up of exams. Exams are open note and are easy if you get the concepts. Since it was online I never talked to him but the powerpoint he provides were helpful to clear up any confusion.

Graded by few things
3.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: B
Jan 18, 2022
Would take again

This class is very simple. You have 5 exams that will makeup the entirety of your final grade. Attendance is not mandatory, but helps a lot. Exams are tough, study hard and don't wait until last minute to study. Powerpoints have most of the info you will need, but he will add some extra questions in class that will probably be on the exam.

Test heavy
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Grade: A+
Feb 17, 2022
Would take again

BEST PROFESSOR BY FARRRRRR

Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
Oct 5, 2022
Would take again

All around an amazing professor, straight to the point and explains things so clearly.

Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
PHILOSPHY
Grade: A
Nov 15, 2022
Would take again

At first, I was scared of his class having never taken a 300-level course before, especially a philosophy class. He is a very good teacher and gives you study questions to help with tests. His tests are easy if you show up to class, participate, and TAKE NOTES. He teaches by writing on the white board so show up and take notes.

Amazing lectures
Respected
Test heavy
2.0
5.0
PHIL105
Grade: B
Nov 16, 2022

This class was online asynchronous and it was super hard. If you are not a good test taker DO NOT TAKE this class. The class is only based on exams with some extra credit. The exams have short answers. Book heavy and powerpoint heavy.

EXTRA CREDIT
Test heavy
Graded by few things
4.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 12, 2023
Would take again

5 exams and a paper, that's it. The exams are all open "book" from the PDF's provided, no book purchsase required. Exams are multiple choice or true / false, plus 2-3 short answer. Maybe not the best format for optimal learning, but easy enough class.

Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Grade: A+
May 2, 2023
Would take again

He was amazing. You have to buy his text book, it's like $20, but then his lectures go with the book perfect. He also has this dry humor which I really enjoyed. Very smart and very helpful.

5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
May 12, 2023
Would take again

5 tests and one paper (easy grading). 2 extra credit quizes multiple choice. No busy work, or discussion posts. Tests are open book from the provided pdf and all multiple choice except a few short answer.

4.0
4.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
May 13, 2023
Would take again

Not the most engaging in class but he is very knowledgeable about the material. Pay attention in class and read the textbook. The content was not easy at all and is very different from what most people think when they hear about philosophy. However, I believe the content was interesting to learn and it is very useful to apply in life.

Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
PHIL105
Grade: C-
Oct 23, 2023
Would take again

Not a bad teacher but if you take it fully online like I did, it is not easy. I have gotten A's and B's for the past two years at NIU and this was my first low grade because it is only 5 exams the test has questions that include interests I wouldn't know of such as painters or even astrology that we were not taught or is not common knowledge.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2023
Would take again

Professor Beaudoin was straightforward in his syllabus. If you read and do the work for the class you will pass. I love teachers like this who want students to do their best but do not hold them to the standard of being experts in the subject. Some quizzes were a little challenging with the short answer questions. Final paper at the end.

Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Jan 4, 2024
Would take again

Although he can have a negative and rude attitude, he is a very good lecturer and makes complicated subjects much easier to understand. Showing up to class and following along should make it very easy to understand what is being taught. Lots of EC opportunities and overall easy class.

EXTRA CREDIT
Amazing lectures
Test heavy
4.0
3.0
PHIL103
Grade: A-
Feb 1, 2024
Would take again

Many of his lectures were very monotone and would make him come off as rude but I never took it that way because I could tell he was just trying to make us think. There was "required" reading weekly but I never did it and still passed with an A- so take that as you will.

Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
May 1, 2024
Would take again

I absolutely loved being in lectures with Professor Beaudoin. You can just tell that this guy oozes with intelligence and he is absolutely the real deal. He isn't the most personable, but he used dry humor extremely well and I thought he was hilarious. Attendance isn't mandatory, but I believe it is important to go to class if you want to succeed.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Respected
3.0
1.0
PHIL353
Grade: A+
May 28, 2024
Would take again

Class was online and async. He has lectures prerecorded and they were paced out well and easy to break up over time. Very clear and easy to understand in his lectures. He is able to explain complex topics in a very simple way. He is an easy grader. Just pay attention and you'll be fine.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
PHIL105
Grade: B+
Jan 23, 2025
Would take again

Engaging prof with a dry wit. Textbook is a must-read, and lectures align well. Exams focus on concepts - prep with unstuck study and you're golden. Overall, a rewarding class if you put in the work.

3.0
4.0
PHIL353
Grade: B
Nov 6, 2025
Would take again

John is very understanding and is good at responding back to messages. I would say he provides a lot of information for exams but the exams are very difficult.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

40%

Textbook Required

74%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 31 grades
Most common grades:
A (16)
B (5)
A+ (4)
Grade Distribution
A(20)B(5)C(3)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(2)
Based on 33 reported grades
A: 16
B: 5
A+: 4
C+: 1
Common Tags
Graded by few things (7)
Test heavy (6)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Get ready to read (5)
Clear grading criteria (5)
Lecture heavy (5)
Amazing lectures (5)
EXTRA CREDIT (4)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.01 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
May
Jan
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

231

5.0

(4)

PHIL

5.0

(1)

PHIL231170

5.0

(1)

INTROPHIL

5.0

(1)

PHIL370

5.0

(1)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

MORALISSUES

5.0

INTROPHIL

4.0

PHIL101

3.8

PHIL105

3.2

PHIL370

3.0

Similar Professors