2.3

John Simecek

English - Oakland University

2.3
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
115
Reviews
2.3
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
2.6
Helpful
2.1
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

115

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
115 total ratings

5

20

4

15

3

13

2

22

1

45

What Students Say

ok all of the post about his being horrible are 100% true

RHT160 - 2.0 rating

John is a compete fruitloop

WRT160 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
Not_Sure_Yet (1)
A+ (1)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 3 reported grades
Not_Sure_Yet: 1
A+: 1
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.55 avg change
Nov
Jan
May
Nov
Nov
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

RHT15060

5.0

(1)

ENG200

5.0

(1)

ENGL1800

5.0

(1)

RHT150160

4.7

(7)

RHT102

4.5

(4)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

RHETORIC150

5.0

RHETORIC160

5.0

RHT

4.3

RHT150

4.0

RHT15060

4.0

Reviews (114)
1.0
4.0
RHT160
Jul 21, 2001

You gotta be a friggin' mind-reader to get anywhere with him. BAD attitude!

3.0
4.0
RHT160
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Mar 14, 2002

neurotic - makes everything more difficult than it has to be-choose someone else

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Apr 30, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
RHT160
May 6, 2002

very unclear, you have to suck up to do good, must write on topic he likes

4.0
2.0
RHT160
Oct 10, 2002

Great class! People either love him or hate him.

2.0
4.0
RHT150
Oct 18, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
RHT150
Nov 4, 2002

Mickey Mouse could do a better job teaching than him.

2.0
4.0
RHT150
Nov 9, 2002

Zippity DooDa, that's all you need to know. Also claims to be God.

3.0
3.0
RHT150
Nov 9, 2002

he is a character, i enjoyed his class

2.0
4.0
RHT
Nov 18, 2002

Lousy insructor; makes class far to difficult. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Nov 20, 2002

If you can't read minds hard class, Grades HARD.

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Nov 24, 2002

If a new course was made on Mind Reading he would be a perfect Instructor.

1.0
5.0
RHT160
Nov 26, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
RHT160
Nov 27, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Dec 2, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
RHT150
Dec 8, 2002

He is VERY closed minded! PETA can EAT ME!

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Jan 7, 2003

Claim to be a feminist vegan. It will help.

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Feb 3, 2003

****, Communist, Can't teach, preaches all class, very frustrating

5.0
4.0
RHT150
Mar 2, 2003

lil weird, but gave me a 4.0 in the end... good guy :)

2.0
4.0
RHT150
Mar 11, 2003

Yes his class was hell, he won't help you, but somehow we all ended up with above 3.0's, and I ended up with a 3.5, even though I did not get above a 3.0 on a single paper.

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Mar 30, 2003

No Comments

3.0
4.0
RHT160
Apr 3, 2003

I learned a lot, but there was a huge workload. He also forces his beliefs on you.

5.0
4.0
RHT160
Apr 22, 2003

This class involved a lot of work, but it forced me to improve. He tends to joke a lot, and it can be hard to tell when is joking or serious. He devotes a lot of time to students, and helping them succeed with their writing. I don't regret this class.

5.0
5.0
RHT150160
Jun 11, 2003

John is great. If you don't feel like putting effort into your writing, do not take him. He does voice his opinions, but he doesn't grade you down if you voice yours.He will help any student that needs help if you show effort. I wish all profs were JOHN!!

3.0
5.0
RHT150160
Jun 12, 2003

Uses his class to push his own ideas on the world.

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Oct 3, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
RHT150
Oct 4, 2003

You will SUFFER all semester, but end of with a mysterious good grade. Its not worth the suffering, if you don't take him for RHT 160 he will harass you forever. He will never give direct answers, and you only get a good grade if he likes the topic.

5.0
4.0
RHT15060
Oct 29, 2003

JOhn is very intimadating at first but he really is the nicest person. He goes to great lengths to make his students become awesome writers. That is if you are willing to put some effort into it! I'm happy I had him!

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Nov 9, 2003

No Comments

2.0
4.0
TUTOR
Nov 20, 2003

This guy is so rude! Does not take people's feelings into consideration! MEANO!

3.0
4.0
RHT150
Nov 21, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
RHT150
Nov 21, 2003

I think that John is quite the hippy, he'll push his personal views on you and try his hardest to make you believe them. He'll take the time to have activists come and harass you also. Hes a funny guy, he'll even wear pink socks!

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Nov 21, 2003

the worst teacher ever lived in the face of the planet and the worst person. i would rather shoot my self in the head than taking his class again.he is an absolute loser.simecek is a cold man.

5.0
2.0
RHT150
Nov 25, 2003

I hated John at first. He was mean and rude to everyone. However, I figured out that he liked to push everyone to do the best that they could do. Believe me you can live through his harrassment for one semester. Trust me it will be worth it.

2.0
5.0
RHT160
Dec 8, 2003

No Comments

5.0
1.0
RHT150160
Dec 23, 2003

My name is Borce Dilevski. I am a student from Oakland University and I am from College Pro. I had this great guy and he is the greatest writing teacher of all time. I recommend to all Oakland University students to take this teacher for writing.

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Dec 26, 2003

TERRIBLE! All he does is push peta on you. I wrote a paper on gender equity and he believes men should be superior! WHAT A JERK

4.0
4.0
RHT160
Feb 14, 2004

Oh boy, this guy just pissed me off very much. He was always pushing his animal rights, ecofeminist, biocentristic agenda on us. To be fair, he is a good writer and I ended up with a 3.8 in the class, but you can only write about anti-human liberal crap

5.0
1.0
RHT150160
Feb 22, 2004

This is Borce Dilevski again. Why are all of you OU people hating this guy? He is the greatest writing teacher of all time. OU people listen to me. By the words of Borce Dilevski,believe me and trust me and take this great man for writing.I love this

3.0
3.0
RHT150
Mar 19, 2004

I took John Fall 2001 my 1st semester in College. What the F***!!! What a way to say Hello to college. This was definately the worst English experience, I have Ever had. What did it was the film of the slaughter house!!

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Mar 22, 2004

No Comments

1.0
3.0
RHT160
Mar 29, 2004

No Comments

5.0
2.0
RHT150160
Mar 30, 2004

All he's looking for is a little effort. The class is a piece of cake. He extends almost every assignment and works with you....the student. Don't let these slackers scare you off. Rhetoric is God.

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Mar 31, 2004

I took John's class the first semester of my freshman year. What a mistake. He was very feministic, and very much for animal rights. He would cancel class very early in the morning, and he made us watch a movie on animals being slaughtered. Awful class

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Apr 4, 2004

he acts like he teaches a rht160 course in our rht150 class. although he is not helpful, rude, takes smoking breaks every 15 minutes, which in an hour can be very annoying. He never taught us one thing in the class, yet expected us to write 10 page papers

5.0
1.0
RHT150160
Apr 7, 2004

This is once again your favorite guy Omar Naqui look alike. Now how many times do I have to tell you clowns that this guy is the best of the best. He's of those guys you will just fall in love with. By the words of Jason Perez, this man is the mexican.

2.0
4.0
RHT160
May 2, 2004

I registered late and he was the only professor available...after taking him, I know why. He gives the least clear directions and expects you to fill in the blanks and know exactly what he is talking about. Add in the occasional "I don't get paid eno

1.0
3.0
RHT150
May 4, 2004

I learned more in my high school english classes than in this class. He took lots of smoking breaks and preached about animal rights. Assignments were never clear, yet he expected you to know exactly what he wanted. I got a 3.5, but do not recomend him!

1.0
5.0
RHT150
May 12, 2004

Horrible class! The only inspiring part was the slaughter video, and that was obviously not what should have been the focus of the class.

5.0
3.0
RHT160
May 27, 2004

Nice guy but there is a TON of work involved.

5.0
2.0
RHT160
Jul 25, 2004

Challanges you to do your best. 10 page papers are nothing-stop being lazy!. Great professor, funny, sarcastic, has strong opinions, but respects your opinion if you are able to respectively support it (not like michael moore).

5.0
4.0
RHT160
Aug 20, 2004

John is a good teacher and he does expect a lot from his students. Yes, you will do a ton of work in his class, but you will learn a lot. He's sarcastic, down to earth, and willing to work with students who put forth an effort.

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Sep 3, 2004

No Comments

1.0
2.0
RHT160
Oct 4, 2004

NO NO NO, avoid him. if you are a conservative, you're already on his sh*t list. he thinks anyone who is not vegan should go to hell.

1.0
4.0
RDG150
Oct 24, 2004

John is really not a very nice person. He claims he has a adult ADD and uses it as an excuse for everything. He'll write all over your papers and you won't get them back for weeks. He makes his classes watch a horrific movie about slaughter houses. Do yourself a favor and avoid him.

1.0
2.0
RHT160
Oct 29, 2004

Stay Away from this guy. 3/4 of my class took his RHT 150 class. He favored them like no other. I have very conservative views and basically he made my life hell for the whole semester. He basically made us watch a video about animal slaughter, so he could impose his Vegan values on the whole class.

2.0
4.0
RHT160
Nov 8, 2004

This professor is extremely picky and detailed. If your a vegan or animal rights activist he will love you. For the first half of the semester I was utterly confussed and thought I would fail. Unless you're a very strong writer do not take this teacher.

1.0
3.0
RHT150
Nov 10, 2004

Horrible teacher.He makes you do so many assignments and then doesnt grade them. Very confusing and all over the place. The worst teacher i've ever had in my life. collects things whenever he feels like it and doesnt warn you. DONT TAKE HIM!

1.0
5.0
RHT150
Nov 12, 2004

VERY odd, dont take him unless you are vegan or an animal rights activist, he will love you then. Extremely out there due to "Adult ADD" which is his excuse for everything. If you like watching animals get slaughtered you will like the video. Otherwise DONT take this class. Take Lawanda Dickens.

1.0
5.0
RHETORIC150
Nov 12, 2004

John is a really nice guy, but as a teacher, he's very hard to understand, never explains his assignments, teaches very abstract ideas, and grades SUPER hard. he's a really nice and funny person, but if you're looking to get an easy class or learn something, DO NOT TAKE HIM.

1.0
3.0
RHT150
Nov 18, 2004

If you make a classroom full of students confused it's a problem. He doesn't explain the work and has high expectations. The work he gives is a joke and so is he. If John Simecek is your last hope. . . don't even consider taking him.

4.0
4.0
RHT160
Nov 29, 2004

LOTS of hard work. He's VERY confusing, but if you constantly ask questions, you won't be confused. I annoyed him to death w/questions, but knew exactly what I was doing when nobody else did. I should have failed for too many absences, but got a 3.6 for my hardwork and writing (he said so himself).

1.0
5.0
RHT160
Dec 10, 2004

Do not take this class, he is very unclear about his work, basically is all over the place when it comes to things. Thinks to highly of himself, gives way to much work and then never collects it or if he does he never grades it when he gives them back.

2.0
3.0
RHT160
Dec 14, 2004

Well, all of the people who talk about the animal slaughter video as a bad thing, it sure changed my life. How can it not? Yes, John is very confusing, and the class seems impossible in the beginning, but if you atleast do the work, and show up most of the time, you will pass with a 3.0 or higher!!!

2.0
2.0
RHT150
Dec 16, 2004

No Comments

2.0
4.0
RHT150
Jan 12, 2005

A good thing about rht there were always web days and he accepted late asg.. He always said do one thing but meant another it was like going in circles. I really hated the way he graded papers and also the fact that they were hardly ever returned. I also didn't likehow he sent improve asg. by oumail

1.0
5.0
RHETORIC160
Jan 22, 2005

DO NOT take this professor unless you want to fail, even without his bias and favroitism hes still very immature and makes up his own rules and regulations and makes people abide to them. NOT A GOOD PROFESSOR. unless you hate BUSH and anyone who fishes dont take him

4.0
4.0
RHT160
Feb 26, 2005

If you can't handle alot of work, then this teacher isn't for you. He is one of the coolest teachers I have ever had but also one of the hardest. Assignments are always pushed back so you always have plenty of time to finish. Enter at own risk!

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Mar 2, 2005

No Comments

1.0
4.0
RHT
Mar 27, 2005

One word...CRAZY

5.0
3.0
RHT150160
Apr 7, 2005

Not your usual professor, but that is exactly why you should take his class. This is a required class at OU and it was by chance that I had him for 150, but chose him for 160. Yes it is difficult, sometimes he's scattered, but he will always help and you will learn how to write. Challenge yourself!!

3.0
5.0
RHT150
May 5, 2005

CRAZY-BIPOLAR, ADD, VEGAN. USED AN ENTIRE CLASS PERIOD FOR A VEGAN SPEAKER. VERY HARD. DON'T TAKE THIS CLASS UNLESS YOU PLAN ON TAKING IT OVER -AND- POSSIBLY GETTING AN ULCER.

1.0
4.0
RHT150
Jun 28, 2005

HATED HIM AND HIS CLASS. HE IS VERY UNCLEAR ABOUT WHAT HE WANTS. HE WAS ALSO A BIT ****. HIS CLASS WAS HELL FOR ME AND I DREADED EVERY MINUTE OF IT AND GOING TO CLASS. AND HE BARELY PASSED ME WITH A 2.1 AND WE NEVER DID ANY WORK SO HOW DID I GET THAT

3.0
1.0
RHT102
Sep 16, 2005

He is very out spoken about his ideas and he will prolly never be on time for class. He can be funny at times, all though i dont think he is trying to be. He sure is different but i think he means well.

4.0
2.0
RHT160
Nov 3, 2005

exeptional instructor.gave students total freedom in assingments.very bias, but just go with it. he is caring and compassionate. you are able to do pretty much whatever you want, just show up.he knows alot about writing and you will learn.just be open to anything and everything.you will never meet someone like him again enjoy it!some think he

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Grade: A+
Nov 7, 2005

John was a really dreat teacher. He's like one I've never met before. He does give lots of freedom, and he's just fun. You can barely understand him or what he's trying to teach but it's worth it. He's very out there. He might grade hard, but he means well

5.0
5.0
RHT102
Nov 10, 2005

Awesome teacher!

5.0
4.0
RHT102
Nov 10, 2005

John is a very great teacher. He always seems to make the whole class laugh as well as answers all the questions we ask, unlike other professors that dont answer the questions. He has taught the whole class and I many new writing techniques. He is an awesome teacher overall!

5.0
3.0
RHT102
Nov 11, 2005

John is an caring professor he hlps you a lot. He lets you trn assignments in late. He always reply to your e-mails. He is a little weird but he doesnt want antbody to fail his class. If you go to class and do the work you will pass with flying colors very easy course.

1.0
5.0
RHT
Nov 13, 2005

WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT!HE IS A MONSTER!

1.0
2.0
ENGLISH1060
Dec 7, 2005

He is a lax teacher and could not follow the administrations guidelines and in effect he screwed us over, finding out that several big assignments were due a few weeks before the class was over! HE IS NOT A GOOD TEACHER! He taught us nothing P.S. He is NOT the GOD of Rhetoric

1.0
4.0
ENG1060
Dec 10, 2005

Worst class ever taken, he teaches nothing and gives horrible grades. Dont give him your email address or they will never stop coming. REALLY BAD CLASS

4.0
2.0
RHT160
Jan 2, 2006

I enjoyed taking John's class. He is unclear on assignments sometimes, but this won't hinder a good student. He grades hard during the term, but I haven't heard anything bad about final grades. He likes to have open discussions about life issues.

1.0
4.0
RHT160
Jan 21, 2006

HE is THE worst teacher I've ever had. He's given me an ulcer. He emails assignments on days off and weekends. He's not a good writer. Annoying. He think's he's the greatest. He needs to get over himself.

1.0
5.0
RHT160
Mar 21, 2006

I would not recommend him to my worst enemy. Save yourself the trouble, and get another teacher.

4.0
5.0
RHT160
Jul 16, 2006

Although John was a very difficult teacher, the one thing I really liked about him was the fact that he was willing to answer my questions and help out (I've actually had teachers who would yell at me if I asked a question). As much as I hated being in his class becuse of the work load, I learned so much from him.

5.0
1.0
ENG200
Jan 3, 2007

I got an A on almost everything. He wasn't the clearest but he knows that so he always gives you more time when he changes something. Not just a boring prof talking on and on, actually a really interesting person to observe and learn from.

4.0
2.0
RHT160
Apr 2, 2007

John is a good guy. I was first turned off by his odd techniques, but later came to enjoy his style, humor, and knowledge. His final grades aren't bad, but during the term he'll be on you. Plan to attend class and talk about everything under the sun. I slacked the first time through, and took him again by choice.

4.0
3.0
RHT160
Oct 21, 2007

John's class structure comes off as difficult, but if you get a handle on what he wants you to do, and you make an effort, he's more than willing to work with you and your grade. He's a real interesting guy, and discussions can be a lot of fun/ very meaningful in this class.

4.0
4.0
RHT160
Dec 31, 2007

i really liked him. he's a great teacher and i learned a lot in his class. just follow the guidelines that he wants and if you have questions, ask ahead of time. don't start papers last minute. hes a nice guy and very funny and easy going.

4.0
4.0
RHT160
Dec 31, 2007

nice guy, just go to every class and follow the guidelines. he's funny and easy to get along with if you do what he requires of the class. he is very passionate about his views on the world and voices them loud and clear. if you dont agree, you are welcome to write about it. just MAKE SURE you have a very very good argument.

3.0
3.0
RHT160
Apr 20, 2008

Our assignments were changed every two seconds; you had to check your email literally everyday to know what the heck was going on. That's another thing: HE WILL EMAIL YOU CONSTANTLY. I received approximately 86 emails from him in one semester. He canceled class frequently; when we did meet it was always anarchy. Hardly used our books, such a waste.

1.0
5.0
RHT160
Jul 1, 2008

okay, john was HORRIBLE!!!!!! i cried like everytime i came from his class because i was so stressed out from that class alone(i thought chemistry would do this to me, not an easy rhetoric class!!! freshman coming in, i highly enoourage u to NOT take his class!!!!!!!!!!

2.0
4.0
RHT160
Jul 2, 2008

GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN!!! John was NOT a good professor. His assignments were unclear and he goes really slow in class. Besides his strange obession with vegans and the color purple, he seemed very biased. About 8 people dropped out after the first class.

2.0
4.0
RHT160
Jul 15, 2008

Friends don't let friends take John Simicek. Boring to NO END. I slept thru most of his classes and still caught everything, he moves so slow... Attendance is mandatory as well. The assignments often change, if you dont write from his point of view, you'll get docked points (he'll tell you otherwise tho) Just dont take his class, pure n simple.

1.0
4.0
RHT160
Aug 13, 2008

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. Consider that your warning. Unless you are a die hard socialist vegan, he WILL mark you down for your beliefs, even tho he says he won't. Boring, painfully slow, assignments change constantly, completely subjective grading, he blows up your e-mail inbox. I dont care if he's the last prof and u have to take 160, DO NOT do it!

1.0
4.0
RHT160
Aug 13, 2008

I thought "well, there are some ppl who liked him, so he cant be that bad" WRONG. The man is a HORRIBLE prof, clueless, and delusional in his beliefs. I dont understand how ANYONE could like that class. I'm laid back and easygoing and I do my work, and i HATED it. THE MAN IS A MONSTER. HE CANNOT TEACH OR GRADE. STAY. AWAY. AT. ALL. COSTS!!!!!!!!!

2.0
4.0
RHT160
Nov 3, 2008

ok all of the post about his being horrible are 100% true. stay away from this guy at all costs. don't try to be some hero and think 'oh well if i try hard i'll be ok' WRONG!!!! WRONG!!! if all classes are full and he is a last resort, WAIT TILL NEXT SEMESTER!

1.0
5.0
ENG101
Nov 14, 2008

bad teacher

3.0
4.0
RHTRHT
Nov 20, 2008

Very sensitive, he rather you write on his prefrences than grammer rules and you will never learn all of his prefrences. He is very difficult if you want to learn how to deal with difficult people he is your man if not stay away far away. If you have him for a class pay mor attention to your presentation not grammer you will never get it correct!

1.0
5.0
WRT160
Jan 6, 2009

This guy is ridiculous. All these comments are true actually I started reading through them mid semester when I had him and I found them all funny and very much true. I wish I had only looked up my teachers while i was at freshmen orientation. I'm very easy going and i get a long well with all teachers this guy was just a league of his own.

4.0
4.0
RHT160
Jan 9, 2009

His guidebook tells you everything and it is a bible to making it through the class. The extra credit is easy and he doesn't grade it very strictly and gives you points no matter how good or bad it is. He grades the same way every time. On the final paper, he's really strict about the works cited.

5.0
4.0
WRT160
Aug 12, 2009

honestly i don't know why there are so many bad reviews on john. he was extremely helpful when i had him, and he wanted everyone in his class to succeed. if given the chance, i would take another class that he teaches again.

2.0
4.0
WRT160
Oct 21, 2009

This guy is horrible. I took the class partially online and he's very email happy. He doesn't know what's going on or what he assigned unless it's online. Our days in class consist of us sitting in silence and him saying the same thing he said the previous week. DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT take this class if you need a 3.0 or higher.

1.0
5.0
WRT160
Oct 22, 2009

Waste of my life. I wish I read this site before because all the bad reviews are actually good because they perfectly described him. HE IS A HORRIBLE TEACHER. He emails constantly & can't remember what he assigns. Didn't even know how to use moodle. He needs to retire. I dropped his class and I'm glad I did. No regrets besides choosing his class.

2.0
4.0
WRT160
Oct 24, 2009

John is a compete fruitloop. He never knows what he assigned and expects you to have assignments he never said one word about. His grading is worthless as well. I got a paper back and he gave it a 3.2. Two weeks later I get the same exact paper pack and he gave it a 3.8. Do not take his class.

1.0
5.0
WRT102
Oct 28, 2009

john is a nut. although he is a cool fellow his class is dumb...i am in wrt 102 and we do 150 work more then we do 102

3.0
1.0
WRT160
Nov 13, 2009

He is an AMAZING teacher!!!...if you follow directions well and love animals and have an open mind on every possible topic known to man. He's good :)

2.0
4.0
WRT160
Jan 8, 2010

i hope he reads this KISS MY A**

4.0
2.0
WRT160
Jan 9, 2010

He's hilarious and very interesting. You must attend class and participate and you will do fine.

3.0
2.0
WRT102
May 3, 2010

Very funny guy. If you come to class and do your work, you will be fine. Attendance is mandatory.

4.0
3.0
WRT102
Nov 22, 2010

Well, John can be funny at times, i feel that for a 102 class he expects much. If you are a hard worker and attend class you will be fine. Laid back style of teaching. I recommend him. Kind-hearted and he loves when students take interest in his class.

5.0
2.0
ENGL1800
Nov 25, 2012

Always available, very down to Earth.

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Grade: A
Jan 14, 2014

I took this class 3 years ago (his last term at OU). He is demanding and exact about what is required in the papers. He wants you to research thoroughly, write concisely, even think critically. Does not like 'fluff.' Do not expect to slide through any of his classes.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
Not_Sure_Yet (1)
A+ (1)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 3 reported grades
Not_Sure_Yet: 1
A+: 1
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.55 avg change
Nov
Jan
May
Nov
Nov
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

RHT15060

5.0

(1)

ENG200

5.0

(1)

ENGL1800

5.0

(1)

RHT150160

4.7

(7)

RHT102

4.5

(4)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

RHETORIC150

5.0

RHETORIC160

5.0

RHT

4.3

RHT150

4.0

RHT15060

4.0

Similar Professors