3.4

John Smolenski

History - University of California Davis

3.4
Quality
3.1
Difficulty
49%
Would Retake
98
Reviews
3.4
Quality
3.1
Difficulty
3.3
Helpful
3.5
Clarity

49%

Would Retake

98

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

30

4

31

3

10

2

13

1

14

What Students Say

U HAVE TO GO TO CLASS

HI170A - 5.0 rating

Pretty clear on how he lectures

HIS17A - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 32 grades
Most common grades:
A- (11)
A (8)
Not sure yet (8)
Grade Distribution
A(9)B(7)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(13)
Based on 42 reported grades
A-: 11
A: 8
Not sure yet: 8
B: 7
Common Tags
Get ready to read (26)
Tough grader (15)
Graded by few things (9)
Gives good feedback (6)
Participation matters (6)
Lecture heavy (4)
So many papers (4)
Caring (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.01 avg change
Apr
Aug
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HST170A

5.0

(1)

HIS102L

5.0

(2)

HIS102K

5.0

(1)

HIST17A

4.3

(3)

HIS17A

4.0

(23)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HIS17

5.0

HST170A

4.0

HIS102K

4.0

HIST181

4.0

HIS170B

3.7

Reviews (98)
5.0
1.0
HIS17A
Nov 16, 2002

Very knowledgable in subject. Gives you terms you need to know and remember.

5.0
1.0
HIS17A
Apr 15, 2003

No Comments

5.0
1.0
HIS17A
Apr 21, 2003

No Comments

5.0
4.0
HIS17A
Oct 6, 2003

organized professor with a great command of the subject he teaches; his knowledge is extraordinary. Getting an A requires SO MUCH effort because TA's can be picky and tough. However, going to TA's office hours helps immensely, especially before final exam

5.0
2.0
HIS017A
Nov 15, 2003

He can seem a bit cold at times, but his lectures are always interesting and he actually is pretty helpful with students, both inside and outside of class. His tests are pretty standard and fair.

5.0
1.0
17A
Dec 25, 2003

good professor. easy class

5.0
1.0
17A
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Mar 7, 2004

Professor Smolenski is such a nice guy; organized professor who prepared us well for exams, and gave us our paper topics well in advance for us to do a solid job. I plan on taking his 170B American Revolution class or any other class he offers

4.0
3.0
17A
Feb 7, 2005

He knows his material very well. He does a nice job in teahing it so that it's easily understandable.

5.0
3.0
HIS170B
Feb 9, 2005

His lectures, though very organized and well explained, are pretty boring. Definitely not the best history professor. Assignments are fair and straightforward, but he is a very unfair grader! He gave me a B on a paper and his ONLY comments were: "could have been more concise, otherwise good."

1.0
5.0
HIS170B
Mar 8, 2005

one of the worst

5.0
3.0
HIS170B
Mar 10, 2005

He's a good lecturer and is very approachable in office hours, though I heard he's harsh on late papers and midterms. He keeps the subject interesting, and I'd recommend him.

5.0
2.0
HIS17A
Mar 16, 2005

Ok - prof is AWESOME my T.A. sucked thou, which wrecked the class. I recommend Prof Smolenski though, he is very passionate about the subject and knows his stuff. His lectures are easy to follow and his exams are decent. Again, beware of evil graduate student T.A.'s

4.0
3.0
HIS170B
Mar 18, 2005

He's a nice guy and a pretty good lecturer. He was cool about the papers and came up with interesting prompts. He gives study guides for the exams and the exams were fair.

4.0
3.0
HIS17A
Mar 19, 2005

He's a good prof, but his tests are pretty demanding. your grade depends completly on the TA, who can be really picky.

4.0
3.0
HIS17A
Mar 23, 2005

one of the reasons i took this class is that previous students rated him easily. NOT anymore! i think he changed the class format or something. however, i did manage to pull an A- with a lot of work. beware the evil graduate TAs! hopefully you get an easier one...unlike me

4.0
2.0
HIS17A
Mar 31, 2005

Smolenski organizes his lectures around id terms and covers each id VERY thoroughly-a lot of history professors assign id terms they've barely covered. I had Robert Chester as a TA and found him to be pretty cool. Raters should NAME NAMES when they talk about "evil TAs" - it helps the rest of us ;-)

5.0
4.0
HIS170B
Apr 5, 2005

Smolesnki is awesome, i put in the same class as Spyrodakis, the class material was very interesting, and he always goes the extra effort to talk to student and give them help, he even told me he likes advising students better than anything else, a rarity in the UC system, id recommend him to anyone

5.0
4.0
17A
Apr 7, 2005

Good teacher, very clear lectures and respectably hard while still enjoyable. I had to study alot for the tests just for all the essay questions, but over all if u get the notes and prepare the essay questions ahead of time it isn't too bad. Depends on TA though. Chester is good, smart guy. Loved it

5.0
1.0
17A
Apr 19, 2005

a bit boring, but very very easy. go to Ta office hours and talk to them before papers and exams. the prof. is friendly too and is approachable. he appears to be cocky, but do not get that impression, he is easy to talk to and is one of the nicest teachers you will ever meet

5.0
3.0
HIS181
Jun 30, 2005

For an upper division class about U.S. religion the class wasn't bad at all. The reading was a bit heavy though, but he is a good lecturer.

4.0
2.0
HIS017A
Dec 9, 2005

He talks really fast, and you are expected to write down all that he says. Some people only write down the things that are likely to be on the midterms (the IDs), but it doesn't matter. Listen carefully. Get a recorder, but don't tell him that you're recording him. Midterms are short, but he forces us to study more than what's covered.

4.0
2.0
HIS17A
Dec 29, 2005

He talks really fast, so be prepared to write quickly. Otherwise, just expect the typical one midterm and two term paper set up with the final exam. KNOW THE IDs and just pay attention to the big general themes of the class (westward expansion!, Jefferson's view of America!, the great compromise!, etc.)

3.0
3.0
17A
Dec 30, 2005

Teacher by himself is ok, but TA's are HardASS. A lot of reading!

4.0
2.0
HIS17A
Dec 31, 2005

If you attend all of his lectures and do your reading, this is an ETREMELY easy class. He gives IDs each day, and then picks 10 for the final (you only have to answer 6). Essays were easy if you read the books that they are on. I can't stress enough to attend class. His lectures are pretty cut and dry.

5.0
4.0
HST170A
Mar 24, 2006

Awesome professor. He throws a lot of information at you and expects you to retain a lot, but his lecture style is actually entertaining, kind of funny and he makes what seems (to me, anyway) a dry subject interesting. I had to go to office hours once, when I missed a course, and he was really nice and helpful about it.

4.0
3.0
HIS170A
Apr 9, 2006

he expects a lot from his students and assigns a lot of reading. essays for the class were on the long side, but very reasonable and interesting to do. he's passionate about the subject and gives intersting lectures.

1.0
5.0
HIS170A
Mar 14, 2007

Professor not that interesting and mostly unpleasant to listen to. Papers were really lame and too long. We had to use boring primary sources... I had zero fun in this class. I think I hate colonial history now (and I was really looking forward to it)

4.0
3.0
HIS17A
Mar 15, 2007

This instructor knows his stuff and expects you to know it as well. He does not have slides for his lectures and does not put the id terms online so it is necessary to attend all of the lectures, other than that it is a pretty easy class if you do the reading and go to class.

3.0
3.0
HIS170A
Apr 12, 2007

Smolenski is your average history teacher I was really interested in the topic, and he tells stories that are really interesting at times. At other times, however, he is very dull and mundane. Not a super hard class.

5.0
2.0
HIS17A
Apr 18, 2007

Hey does key points so you have to go to lecture or have a buddy in class. He makes you read ridiculous books followed by ridiculous paper prompts. Tests are easy if you study for them. For the essay parts of the exam, he gives you five prompts to study for and then chooses one of them for the actual exam, which is really helpful.

5.0
2.0
HIST17A
Mar 6, 2008

Great professor who truly knows what he's talking about. Has a cool sense of humor, moves at a steady pace, TAs were helpful, makes the subject matter interesting. Highly recommended

3.0
3.0
HISTO17A
Mar 14, 2008

This professor is pretty good except his lecture are confusing. Everyday he puts on ID's but he doesn't really talk about it. The TA's are awesome, well at least Jeff is. Try to get Jeff. He is very helpful and understanding.

4.0
3.0
HIS17A
Mar 20, 2008

Great Professor. Midterm/final are very fair as he provides you with all the tested material beforehand. Lectures were informative and interesting.

4.0
4.0
HIS170A
May 5, 2008

Generally, the readings are more interesting than the lectures. He gives possible essay questions and IDs prior to the exams, but still a lot to prepare for before midterm and final. His grading style is relatively fair.

1.0
5.0
HIS17
Jan 7, 2009

He was TERRIBLE. He came unprepared to class and would show out of date maps that held no relevance to what was being talked about. He couldnt answer questions in class so he would beat around the bush to avoid answering them. DO NOT take his class. His TA Chad, was TERRIBLE, he also knew little to none. I felt I could teach/TA better.

2.0
1.0
HIS17A
May 25, 2009

easy A class, but overall, the class sucked- boring and the professor has no personality. never once enjoyed a lecture of his

5.0
3.0
HIS102L
Mar 21, 2010

lots of reading which is hit or miss, but nice guy and interesting topic.

5.0
4.0
HIS102L
Mar 25, 2010

Excellent teacher... used seminar discussion to make us understand the reading without spoonfeeding... taking another class from him next quarter!

4.0
1.0
HIS170
May 26, 2010

here's the skinny - 1 midterm, 1 final, 2 papers. u dont need to do the readings, BUT there are key terms due online everyday (one or two that you pick out of one reading, it takes ten minutes). his lectures are GREAT and entirely relevant to the tests and papers. his an easy greader and he gives great study guides for the test. take this class

5.0
4.0
HIS170A
Jun 4, 2010

Contrary to my classmate's claim below, you actually DO need to do the reading, unless you're okay with getting a C. The essays and exams are graded rigorously, but if you put in the time and effort, you will learn a lot. The lectures can be a bit dry at times, but he is very helpful, approachable, and good humored. I highly recommend the course.

4.0
4.0
HIS170
Aug 11, 2010

Tough, but fair, with grading. Do the reading, go to class, engage in lecture and you'll be fine. Really knows the field and clearly brings his passion into the classroom.

5.0
1.0
HI170A
Sep 5, 2010

U HAVE TO GO TO CLASS. take GOOD notes or make friends w/someone who does. readings are not necessary. i read nothing until the the wk b4 the essays were due to know what to write on. the midterm and final were fair, and he grades the essays EASY. dont buy the txtbks. go to the reserves if u need them, ull only need a few quotes for the essays

4.0
4.0
HIST17A
Dec 17, 2010

He gave good insight into the frequently unheard stories in History.

2.0
2.0
HIST170
Jan 13, 2011

Class is easy. He is unclear and unhelpful.

5.0
4.0
HIS102K
Apr 9, 2012

Senior seminar on "Race and Religion in America." 8 books, about 1 per week (reading is required), weekly summaries, two papers, and discussion. Smolenski is a great prof--he leads the discussion in the right direction, gives helpful feedback in papers, and knows a lot about the subject. I would highly recommend this class to any history major.

4.0
3.0
HIS17A
Jul 6, 2012

Professor Smolenski is a great teacher. He knows his stuff! Although, every now and then his lecture can be a bit dry. His is very clear on his expectations. Like all history classes, this does require quite a bit of reading, but it's interesting. There is a midterm, 2 papers, and a final. Read and attend lecture and you should be fine!

1.0
3.0
HIS017
Jun 20, 2013

horrible teaching skills. Taking this class as GE, found out history is boring. Maybe this guy is boring. After this class, I have no more interest in history class any more.

4.0
1.0
HIS17A
Jul 15, 2013

For a GE class, this class is very easy. Although lectures tend to be dull and boring, his midterms and finals are pretty easy. He gives out the prompts ahead of time and a list of the vocabulary words he will use on the tests. There's no excuse to not get a good grade.

3.0
4.0
HIS17A
May 2, 2014

This is not an easy A class. you have to keep up with the class by reviewing your notes, attending lectures and Sections, and doing the reading. In my opinion, this is way more work than what a 4 unit class should have. Also, he is a really hard tester and he is very rude. i took this class because people said he was chill, they were wrong.

3.0
4.0
HIS017A
Grade: B
May 21, 2014

Section is absolutely mandatory and you have to participate to get a good grade in the class. The midterm, final, and essays are graded very difficulty. He goes through notes quickly. He does give out his midterm/final essay prompts early, although the grading on those is very specific and tough. I recommend going to your TA's office hours.

2.0
5.0
HIS17A
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Jun 10, 2014

i don't know why people think this is an easy class, maybe take a look at dates and you'll get what i mean when i think of increasing difficulty because of "easy ratings". all honestly, one of the harder classes i have taken in davis. grading is TERRIBLE + make sure you try to get back points. avoid if you don't have time to put in

4.0
4.0
HIS17A
Jun 13, 2014

He knows what he is talking about and is very knowledgeable about the subject but this is NOT AN EASY CLASS. Section is mandatory and is a big chunk of your grade and you must participate to get a decent grade. Grading is harsh and ridiculously specific.

3.0
4.0
HIS17A
Grade: B
Dec 15, 2014

Hardest GE class I've taken. Two papers, both about 5 pages. One midterm and one final. His grading is ridiculous and grades more on structure than content. Refused to release grading rubrics, which is not helpful to the student. Chooses to grade on specific things. avoid.

5.0
3.0
HIS17A
Dec 16, 2014

Pretty clear on how he lectures. Just make sure that you are ready to write down notes as many as possible because he likes to give tests with one or two essay questions and IDs that you have to identify and show the significance. He wants you to correlate many things, even some that may seem minuscule at first but important later. A lot of readin

2.0
3.0
HIS17A
Grade: C+
Jan 5, 2015

I took HIS 17A because I had AP Hist. in High School, I thought the class would be interesting. Lectures were 1hr & 20mins. They were the most dreadful, dull, and boring lectures of my life! I would see people falling asleep in the lecture hall, and fell asleep a few times myself. Midterm and Final are easy, papers are graded a little harsh though.

5.0
3.0
HIS17A
Grade: A-
Jun 7, 2015

If you actually care about the material: he's a great teacher and the class if pretty enjoyable. If you're looking for an easy A: anyone can get an A in this class as long as you put time into it.

1.0
5.0
170A
Jun 15, 2015

Horrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4.0
3.0
HIS170A
Dec 3, 2016
Would take again

The more of a history buff you are, the better Smolenski is, and vice versa. His lecture style definitely caters to history majors, as do the assignments. Tough on the essays, little less on the exams (need a 3.5 here lol). Helpful in office hours if you don't go in with the expectation that he'll give you all the answers. Overall solid professor.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
4.0
4.0
HIST17A
Dec 9, 2016
Would take again

Great teacher who knows a lot about American history. There were 3 papers (I believe, or maybe two?), two midterms, and a final. This class is enjoyable when you desire to learn more about American history. There is an extensive amount of reading, so do not sign up for an "easy A". This professor is great, even though he might seem dry at times.

Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Amazing lectures
4.0
3.0
HIS017A
Grade: B+
Dec 10, 2016
Would take again

Smolenski was a great professor. His lectures are clear and helpful for the exams. He does provide his students with readings however, they're not necessarily mandatory except for the discussion readings. He informs his students about what kind of information will be on exams which helped a lot, and I do urge you to attend his lectures for terms!

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
4.0
HIS017A
Grade: A-
Jan 3, 2017
Would take again

Smolenski taught very clear about the US history till 1860 Civil War. You don't necessarily need to read the textbook, but read through them can give you better understandings. The papers based on the two books and graded by TAs. And the exams included IDs given in class and essay questions; he would give you the essay questions beforehand. The discussion sections are crucial for the understandings of the history development, so please attend and participate.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Participation matters
4.0
4.0
HIS170B
Grade: B
Nov 14, 2018
Would take again

Class definitely caters to History majors, and Smolenski can go on tangents that feel pointless. I was often confused in lec. That said this class gave me a better understanding of American politics and an appreciation for our country's roots. Also, Smolenski is pretty funny in his subtle jokes. He also told us he reads all his reviews so hello

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
HI170A
Grade: A
Apr 21, 2019
Would take again

Smolenski is really funny in lecture, and provides unique perspectives from marginalized groups. I really enjoyed the readings (though a lot) and his lectures. He cares about his students and will strike up conversation before class. I really enjoyed this class and would take him again.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
1.0
4.0
HIST181
Grade: C
Jun 19, 2019
Wouldn't take again

John is funny to listen to, but is incredibly nit picky with tests and papers. Ive never had the need to actually talk to a teacher about a paper before, but some of his criticisms were objectively unwarranted, and his commentary was insulting. I should not have gone to him though as he came to win a debate, not to discuss an essay.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
5.0
4.0
HIS017
Grade: A
Jun 22, 2019
Would take again

Professor Smolenski is fantastic. I can tell he really cares about his lectures and went above and beyond to help students like me who needed it.I found him to be funny and extremely well versed on the topics we were studying. His help has made me consider changing my major to History that is how good a class this was. Thank you Prof Smolenski

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
1.0
4.0
HI170A
Grade: A-
Mar 2, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I cannot express how boring his lectures are! They are so confusing and extremely hard to follow. Half of the time no one knows what he is talking about, therefore, many students do other homework in his class! The two papers he gives are not bad, however, the tests are extremely stressful to study for. I dread going to this class. DO NOT TAKE!!!!!

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
HIS017A
Grade: A-
Mar 3, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Smolenski's mentioned he reads his rate my professor stuff, which makes me think all the good ratings are written himself Class graded on 2 papers, 1 midterm, a final w NOOO curve He grades SO harshly, most of my try hard peers are borderline A- or B+ rn & the final will be accumulative which is 300 years of history to study for!! boring lectures

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
HIS181
Grade: A-
Mar 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

AVOID if you can! His lectures are ill-prepared and rarely connect with the reading. His lecture style is confusing, at best. Prompts for papers are no help, nor are his explanations of them. There is no grading rubric for papers so prepare to be frustrated (regardless of grade) as his feedback can be categorized as "personal preference".

Get ready to read
4.0
2.0
HI170A
Grade: A-
Apr 24, 2020
Would take again

I think I just had a very nice TA because he helped out alot. You don't necessarily have to do all the reading from the textbook, readings from Voices of Freedom help with quizzes during discussion but not mandatory either. Overall, very easy going class.

Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
HIS017A
Grade: A-
Jun 4, 2020
Would take again

Smolenski gave interesting lectures that paired with two textbooks to fill out what could not be covered in the fifty minute classes. The class also consisted of two essays based on books, in which he offered more than enough guidance.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
HIS017A
Grade: Not sure yet
Jul 30, 2020
Wouldn't take again

AVOID PLS!!! GRADED SO HARSHLY AND WAITED LAST MINUTE TO UPLOAD LECTURES. NOT UNDERSTANDING ABOUT THE PANDEMIC SITUATION AND WAS OBSESSED WITH FOOTNOTES. DONT TAKE

Tough grader
4.0
3.0
HIS017A
Grade: A
Aug 4, 2020
Would take again

The online lectures were not too useful, but the readings and discussions helped a lot with the essays. He is a very passionate professor and as long as you do the assigned readings, you should be good.

4.0
2.0
FRS004
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2020
Would take again

Smolenski is a pretty solid professor. Weekly response papers and a final project, not too bad. Ended with a 96% and I learned something new :)

Participation matters
Graded by few things
So many papers
5.0
4.0
HIS181
Grade: C+
Mar 5, 2021
Would take again

Despite the poor grade in the class (it was the Winter quarter COVID came), he was still an awesome teacher and human. I learned so much new stuff I did not before, and he even did different activities other than lecturing which was cool. This man loves IHOP as well and definitely made sure we knew about it. Love him.

Hilarious
Amazing lectures
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
HIS017A
Grade: Not sure yet
Jul 29, 2021
Wouldn't take again

His definition of a "short" essay is 1200 to 1500 words. His online take home final was two 1200-1500 word essays which we had 4 days to do, but he extended it to 5 days after student feedback.

Gives good feedback
Tough grader
2.0
3.0
HIS170A
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 2, 2022
Wouldn't take again

For a class that's poorly designed and teaches you absolutely nothing new about the colonial era, this man is sure hard on your short analyses. If you want a class that's hard on your writing in a useful way - take El Shakry or Chiang. They are amazing AND tough. This mediocre, rambling man is of no help.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Tough grader
2.0
3.0
HIS170A
Grade: B
Mar 5, 2022

Smolenski himself is an ok professor - he's a bit all over the place but most of his class material is organized and he genuinely cares about the topic which is much appreciated. His grading can be a bit harsh and based on his own take on history, and without any clear logic or rubric it feels non-conducive to growth. Not a bad class though.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lots of homework
4.0
1.0
HIS170A
Grade: A+
Mar 8, 2022
Would take again

His TA graded everything but gave solid feedback. Graded on two papers, take home final, 5 short essays where lowest two were dropped. Hardest part of class was how disorganized he was about due dates/lectures but he was very understanding and willing to give extensions due to own mistakes. Very responsive to feedback but did not respond to emails

Get ready to read
Caring
Respected
2.0
4.0
170A
Grade: B+
Mar 24, 2022

Although the class was academically informative, the professor is a late and tough grader. I didn't get my grade for two assignments, a paper, and my final exam until 4 days after the last day of classes, which means I had no opportunity to better my grade before it was submitted. Besides that, you should know its a lot of writing (vague prompts)

Tough grader
So many papers
1.0
5.0
HIS017A
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 26, 2022

Avoid him at all costs Seriously how hard is it to post some slides?

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Test heavy
3.0
2.0
HIS110
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 6, 2022
Would take again

He is always late with his lectures & reading assignments. It's finals week and I still don't know what my grade is. But, he is aware that his lateness with assignments has caused unnecessary stress on his students, & he's willing to make amends without ego. That, I believe, is a sign of a good professor.

Caring
Graded by few things
4.0
2.0
HIS110
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 6, 2022
Would take again

Lots of reading. He's always late with publishing stuff on Canvas, so I recommend going to class in person to stay on top of things. He's compassionate and willing to admit his flaws as a professor. After we expressed our concerns, he made changes to make it easier for the class.

Get ready to read
Caring
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
17A
Grade: A-
Aug 15, 2022
Would take again

You will have to read a lot. Weekly discussions were easy, fair paper topics, and he does not grade harshly as long as you stick to his criteria and use lots of references from the primary sources if he asks for it (very important).

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
HIS110
Grade: A
Nov 3, 2022
Would take again

He may be a bit disorganized with posting readings and assignments but was highly self-aware and open to student questions and feedback. His lectures were informative and gave a great overall view of the Atlantic colonial world. Assignments included 2-3 papers, weekly discussion posts based on the assigned reading, and a take home final exam.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Caring
2.0
1.0
170A
Grade: A
Feb 21, 2024

Smolenski is nice but this class was a drag. He gets bogged down in qualifying everything he says and never manages to make his point. I don't want to be mean but its very frustrating because his lectures run long. He should be confident in his convictions and less afraid of offending people. He is behind on grading and posts assignments late.

3.0
5.0
HI170A
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 28, 2024

He is a passionate lecturer but he tends to think you can understand everything he says. We had two weeks for a 1700 word essay and another 2 weeks for a 2300 word essay. He is often late on his grading and somewhat disorganized. I recommend going to lectures since he does not post recordings often.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
HIS170A
Grade: A-
Mar 16, 2024
Would take again

Smolenski gives really great lectures about colonial-American history, in which we learn the stories of all kinds of people who lived in the region. He has so much knowledge about all of this history. However, we often didn't cover enough during the class time and we had to watch some lecture recordings outside of class. Otherwise, it was great!

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Lecture heavy
2.0
1.0
HI170A
Grade: A
Mar 25, 2024

This class was just ok, very easy A. Professor was very nice, and enthusiastic about class material, but quite disorganized and would often postpone or cancel assignments after forgetting to open them. Quizzes and tests were very doable, never opened the textbook once, just lectures and canvas sources.

3.0
3.0
17A
Grade: A-
Mar 29, 2024

His lecturing could have been more enthusiastic or intriguing, as it felt repetitive and sometimes flat. There's lots of readings which most of the papers and exams are based on, so reading is very important. The papers were graded by TA's and I always felt I got fair and good grades. I wish the class covered a bit more about the era.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
4.0
2.0
HIS017A
Grade: A
Mar 30, 2024
Would take again

Solid professor and class. Lots of readings (you don't technically need to read all of them, but know them so you can reference them as primary sources for your papers). 1 midterm and a final, both are in-class essays, and the prompts are handed out beforehand. 2 papers. Lectures recorded. Discussion participation was mandatory. Graded by your TA

Get ready to read
Participation matters
So many papers
2.0
3.0
HIS017A
Apr 5, 2024

Professor Smolensk is an alright professor. He tends to ramble and never gets straight to the point. Not very engaging but you should still attend lecture. Sections are mandatory and you have to participate for points. Harsh grader so do the readings, ask for help, and put in a lot of effort. Try to avoid him, its not worth it.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
4.0
HIS110
Aug 4, 2024

While I enjoyed Prof Smolenski's lecture material, he often rambled in class leading to lecture content being postponed, while he still expected you to write about this content that he had not discussed yet

1.0
5.0
17A
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 20, 2024

HEAVY Discussion. If you are not good at giving presentations or communicating with others, RUN RIGHT NOW! HARD understand his lecture. Two papers. Midterm and Final with writing a paper in person.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
2.0
3.0
17A
Dec 3, 2024

two papers, one midterm paper, and one final paper (buy ur blue books and have money for printing). I didn't learn anything from in-person lectures (often went off topic) but they're recorded... need to attend discussion to participate/talk. there's a LOT of reading (abt 3 txtbks) you need to keep up with. personally I wouldn't take again.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
2.0
4.0
HIS110
Grade: A-
Dec 23, 2024

Everything was graded late and it was impossible to know if you were doing well

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
2.0
5.0
HIS017A
Grade: B
Jan 6, 2025

There was a lot of reading (3 assigned texts) and work associated with this class, I would not recommend this class unless you have to take it. There were 2 large papers, midterm, final, and discussions were mandatory. Lectures were difficult to follow because the professor was constantly off topic and also not necessary to do well in this class.

Lots of homework
So many papers
4.0
2.0
17A
Grade: B
Jan 8, 2025
Would take again

Wonderful teacher, taught very well, bad TA luck of the draw be prepared to speak in every discussion or your grade WILL tank. When I say talk you must participate in every single question asked, not everyone in my section even got full points for every week.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
170A
Grade: B
Mar 29, 2025

Worst professor I have ever had. He knew his stuff but was disengaged during lectures, making them boring and repetitive. The readings were the only good part of his course. Nothing was graded until after the final. He was constantly behind, leading to questions not being taken and old lectures being assigned to watch at home. He won't teach. Run.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 32 grades
Most common grades:
A- (11)
A (8)
Not sure yet (8)
Grade Distribution
A(9)B(7)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(13)
Based on 42 reported grades
A-: 11
A: 8
Not sure yet: 8
B: 7
Common Tags
Get ready to read (26)
Tough grader (15)
Graded by few things (9)
Gives good feedback (6)
Participation matters (6)
Lecture heavy (4)
So many papers (4)
Caring (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.01 avg change
Apr
Aug
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HST170A

5.0

(1)

HIS102L

5.0

(2)

HIS102K

5.0

(1)

HIST17A

4.3

(3)

HIS17A

4.0

(23)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HIS17

5.0

HST170A

4.0

HIS102K

4.0

HIST181

4.0

HIS170B

3.7

Similar Professors