3.0
Quality4.0
Difficulty51%
Would Retake124
Reviews51%
Would Retake
124
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
33
4
22
3
16
2
23
1
30
What Students Say
“Barker is easily one of the best professors in the engineering department”
ME331 - 5.0 rating“So you will likely take a hit on your first grade regardless”
ME331 - 2.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
43%
Textbook Required
39%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.63 avg changeRatings by Course
ME344
3.3
(24)ME331
3.2
(33)MSE20028284
3.0
(1)ME202
2.9
(64)ME336
1.5
(2)Difficulty by Course
ME336
5.0
ME331
4.2
ME344
4.2
ME202
3.9
MSE20028284
3.0
Reviews (124)
He's average at teaching but makes the class more difficult than it has to be. Doesn't give a review, doesn't tell you what to expect/study for tests. Nothing. For the first test the average was a 60 and for the second a 70. No curve. Uses the EF website for the HW but never checks the discussion board. Ever.
Tries really hard to teach, but you wont learn anything in class unless you go to his office hours and talk to him one on one. Never Checks discussion board for homework so you're helpless. Doesn't work practical examples in class. Doesn't tell you what to expect for the test at all. He is not willing to help you out if you get a bad grade either.
He's a terrible teacher and the homework is only 10% of your grade so it'll barely help your grade. Bad move on UT on hiring this man. Makes the class impossible. He literally doesnt care how his student do on the tests. He personally told me that unless the test averages were in the 50's (they're 60's and lower 70's) he would not curve at all.
This guy is a great teacher. Keeps you entertained, explains things very well, and his tests are very fair. You will not get an easier teacher for this class. Homework is 10% of your grade. He normally collects 3 or 4 problems every week and a half. Three tests and a final. Tests are easy if you know how to do your homework. Best teacher I have had
Barker is great! I loved his ME344 class. He was clear, to the point, approachable, and funny to keep students engaged. HW was effective and reasonable. Tests were like HW, time was a small issue, but not major. I've been at UT for awhile now, and he is my favorite professor so far. I give him BIG thumbs up and would recommended him highly!!!
Pretty useless. He spends a whole class going over one problem that is some simplistic version of what our homework is then amps it up 2 more notches for his test! Terrible.
Dr. Barker is GREAT! His lectures are helpful and detailed but not dry and academic. Invites questions and does a good answering them. HW assignments are very reasonable. Tests are tough, but if you do the homework it should go like clockwork. I would highly recommend him to anyone to take for any class.
A useless teacher. Does not post grades and does not prepare you for tests or homework. Goes over one problem per class that is a super easy version of what is to come and is very rude when you give him feedback. I would highly recommend not taking him.
Barker is very useless. He does not help at all. When you ask him questions, he goes around the answer and is very sarcastic about everything. His tests are nothing like what he teaches in class. The average on the first two tests were a 55 and 60, and he did not curve them.
If you absolutely cannot avoid taking him, spend most of your time in another Statics class. His lectures are useless; I'm not sure if he's ever really looked at the online homework that's assigned. Find an older engineering student and use their binder for guidance. Again: ATTEND SOMEONE ELSE'S STATICS LECTURES.
One of the worst professors I have take at UTK. The examples he goes over in class are not nearly as hard as the questions that are on the test. When you ask him a question he has trouble answering it too. I got a decent grade in this class but I would NOT recommend taking him for ME 202! One of the worst decisions of my college career.
I'm a 4.0 student in college who has never gotten below a B+ in any class and I failed this class. The material is easy, the entire difficulty of the class is solving the problems exactly like the professor does, or you will get less than half credit. Even for correct answers. This class isn't about learning. It is rote memorization of format.
Hands down he is the worst professor I have come across at the university. His goal is not to teach the material as it will be used after college nor how he will test students and the material. It takes more that just a few practice problems to truly understand the material.
Barker is great teacher. He explains the material slowly and clearly. His tests are fairly reasonable however, he can a tough grader. Would recommend taking.
Took Barker last Spring and failed the class. He completely changed his homework/tests/and teaching style for 202 around and is now much easier. Now I'm on track to make an A. Would recommend now that he's gotten his act straightened out.
Thermo is hard. Barker does a very good job explaining the material, telling you the "what" as well as the "why". GO. TO. CLASS. You will fail if you don't go! I missed one class, and the example problem we did was on the final worth 30pts/100. Try to understand why you're doing the things you're doing not just equations-it won't be enough.
Homework is tedious and graded extremely harshly. Do not expect to get an easy homework portion of your grade. Dr. Barker's exams are difficult and he's the first engineering professor I've had that has exam problems without partial credit given. He is professional but comes across as rude during lecture and in personal meetings. He does not curve.
The guy is a great lecturer. He finds ways to keep your attention during class and some of the material is really fascinating. However, it's like the guy gets off to not helping you. He's extremely rude when you ask questions and will simply shrug sometimes and say that sounds frustrating. He NEEDS a TA so you can talk to someone else.
He doesn't teach the material covered on homework until AFTER you have to turn it in. This makes the homework highly difficult, and exams are graded harshly. He seems like a nice guy, but comes off very rude in lecture. He makes statics way more difficult than it needs to be.
Barker is a mediocre teacher at best. He assigns homework material and then goes over the material in the lecture that it is due. His tests are difficult and his grading style doesn't help at all. I am a straight A student and this is the only other grade I have ever made, C. Steer clear from him
Barker is a spectacular lecturer, and he makes an effort to make sure you understand the material. His tests are difficult, but not impossible if you take the time to actually do the homework and understand the concepts. His bad reputation is completely unwarranted, and his classes are, by far, the most informative I've taken at UTK.
Good overall with good lectures. A seemingly nice guy when in a group setting. He gets condescending and arrogant when you go to ask him for help privately, however. He will still help you, but he's going to be snobby about it. He will not work with you on rescheduling tests. Basically the lesser of 2 evils for several classes, so pick your poison.
Statics is kind of a common sense class. I think most people know that and I know Barker thinks that. With that being said, Barker teaches it well even though you can tell he thinks the material is strait forward. He is a very tough grader and there are two midterms and one final. You get 90% of your grade from the three exams and 10% from the HW.
A lot of people disagree, but I think Dr. Barker is a great teacher. Although I heard he wasn't good for Statics, I have taken him for Thermo and Heat Transfer and greatly enjoyed both. He is VERY particular, but once you accept that it's easy to do what he asks. I feel like I really learn the material taught by him. ME 344 is still tough though!
Statics is not hard curriculum wise. With that being said, do not take Dr. Barker. His lectures are straight forward, but the homework is not. The tests are not easy. The grading on the tests, which are 90% of your grade split between 2 tests and a final, is atrocious and does not make sense half the time. Steer clear if you can.
He goes over very simple topics in class. Then, he assigns really difficult problems on homework for accuracy. The day homework is due, he will mostly go over the homework problems. Homework is 10%, both midterms are 30%, and the final is 30%. If you do poorly on one test, you're kind of screwed.
The concepts are simple but hard to explain so I ended up teaching myself almost everything at the end of the semester. Barker is a good teacher but you have to do more than just go to class. Pay attention in class and don't slack you'll fall behind. I didn't think I would pass but he helped a lot at the end when I did a lot better on the final.
Lectures were clear and well organized. The homework was reasonable and straight-forward. His grading on tests is different, but that is by no means a class-killer. Honestly, people that think he is a bad professor probably haven't had a bad professor yet. He's good, and I recommend him. One more thing, don't expect any curving.
He's the definition of fair, but he's hard. His tests are limited in length making each question heavily weighted. He does partial credit by making each step in his required methodology worth a given amount even if final answer is correct full credit may not be received. The most important thing solve the problems how he wants you to.
As others have mentioned he is easily the toughest grade around. He is also very to talk to and doesn't have the ego the other Phd have, he is probably the best Prof. in the ME Dept in regards to teaching very clear and very thorough. Exams are moderately challenging. I would easily take him again for any ME course. He just knows how to teach.
Exceedingly frustrating! Class was way more difficult than it should be. Spends most of his time going over the previous class rather than new material. The most basic examples are done in class, then very difficult examples are in the homework, including concepts not previously discussed. Picky grading with unclear point deductions on test and hw.
If you don't follow the one specific process he wants you to use on the exams, he will deduct a lot of points. On top of that, the exams take a while to finish even though they're only a few problems long, and they account for 90% of your grade, so you can't really afford to fail more than one. Weigh your options heavily before taking him
Barker is easily one of the best professors in the engineering department. He makes the material interesting, and I found it easy to pay attention and do the work. The downside is he's a hard grader, and you need to learn what he likes. Take him if you want to gain deep understanding of the material and better problem solving skills.
Barker is an amazing lecturer who really makes you understand the material. That being said, he is still a tough teacher. Make sure to do the homework and do not skip class. The examples he does in class are sometimes used on tests and they really help you understand the material better.
He's a good lecturer and he will take time to help you understand if you stop by his office hours, but his grading is the strictest I've ever encountered. You can get the right answer, and still miss half the problem because it's not exactly like he wanted. This, combined with a short exam period, yields very low test averages and there's no curve.
Worst Professor Ever. Run away!!!
Very tough grader and he doesnt give you much info on how to do the homework. However, very nice guy, and has office hours everyday M-F. He doesnt want you to fail, but he wont make it easy on you.
Dr. Barker is a great professor and his lectures are easy to understand and are beneficial, so DO NOT SKIP. He is a very tough grader and expects you to write down every step in your thought process, so be conscientious when writing your work. Other than his tough grading, no major problems with him. Willing to help in & outside of class.
Dr. Barker really knows how to teach thermo and you'll get more out of attending lectures than learning the content outside of class. He goes at a slow pace and really simplifies thermodynamics. He is a very picky homework grader... but it's only 10% of your grade and it prepares you. His tests are very straightforward and you have plenty of time.
Barker's grading is off-the-charts tough, small mistakes will lose you BIG points. His lectures are very very good, and he has a great fundamental understanding of statics. DO NOT miss class, he doesn't post any notes online and even if he did they don't make any sense unless you were in lecture. If not for the tough grading i'd take him again.
Barker's lectures are really good and you really understand the material he is talking about, but a lot of times some of the homework problems are much tougher than what he talks about it class making it extremely difficult to do. He is an extremely tough grader and counts off a lot for little things. Listen to what he wants you to do on the exams
Very good teacher. DO WHAT HE SAYS HE WANTS YOU TO DO ON EXAMS and GO TO CLASS. If you do this, and you prepare for the exams by practicing the homework and in class examples, you will get a good grade. Students trash him because they didn't follow directions and he took points off despite him clearly stating that's exactly what he would do.
Dr. Barker is a very good and clear professor. You know exactly what he expects from you on exams (Write your equation in symbolic form. Write the variable, answer, and units and box the whole thing etc...) and if you follow his instructions you won't lose the points that so many other reviews complain about. Exams and homework are very similar.
He can be nitpicky with the grading, but he wants to make sure you know what you're doing and not just memorizing a bunch of steps to solve a problem. That's why he asks for so many specific things on exams that students love to ignore and then promptly whine about. Be sure to go to class as nothing is uploaded except assignments.
Bases homework grades on a single problem. If you do not do well on an individual problem on an exam, you will likely fail the test, as his tests are only 3 or 4 questions. He will give a lot of partial credit if you show the Statics process
I genuinely miss this man. I have never had more engaging lectures than the ones Barker presented. However, he grades extremely harshly. You MUST format the homework and tests exactly as he states or you will miss out on a lot of points. Make sure you show all work and go to as many lectures as you can. You'll learn a lot.
Dr. Barker is a great lecturer; you will always leave class understanding something way better than when you came in, and he is very accessible outside of class if not. He is a very strict grader, but for good reason. He wants you to walk away a more organized engineer that when you came. Most importantly, GO TO LECTURE! You need it for the grade!
Barker is an AMAZING professor... If you go to class and talk to him in his office and follow HIS problem solving process. He will take off points for very small details in homework and tests. There are only 3 exams including the Final and he does not curve very much (you might be able to argue for points back)
He is honestly one of the best professors that I have ever had. He's very clear in his expectations and he keeps his lectures interesting. The biggest downside is that there really isn't room for error. If you mess up on an exam, there's no chance to make it up. My advice is make sure you can do the homework and problems similar to homework.
3 exams worth 30 % of your grade each. Worst professor I've ever had
Dr. Barker is a very funny teacher. He is very good at explaining material well and thoroughly. However, the class seemed to be a lot harder than the material suggested. If you have taken EF151/152, the class should not be very difficult. He is just a very strict grader, and I would often be counted off a great deal simply for labeling errors.
Oh my god. Harshest grader I've ever met. This man has NO mercy. If you mess up one exam, you won't pass this class. I know many people who failed this course, so you're lucky if you pass. Barker has a special format he wants everything in, so if you can get that right, you should pass. He's the best out of all ME202 profs, so get him if you can.
He's hilarious and a great professor. He teaches you everything you need to know and what to expect on each exam. He's an easy grader if you solve problems his way, even if you get the question wrong. The class is pretty easy, just pay attention in class and you'll do fine. Highly recommend taking him!
Dr. Barker is a very intelligent, funny, and personable professor. His classes contain a lot of content, but if you took and understand EF 151 and EF 152 you should have a good foundation for the class. He clearly lays out what he expects of you to include in your work. Overall, I would definitely take him again!
Opinions vary about him... However, he's definitely the toughest grader you will ever see in your college time. He sees the difference between A and B is a letter. For us, it is enough to get you accepted or rejected into further programs, schools, etc. I only need to learn Thermo, not what you like or dislike about how my solution is stated!
344 is an absolute joke with Dr. Barker. He posts videos ahead of class and completely wasted class time by trying to fish for questions that were never there so class only took about 15 minutes. I would recommend taking someone else if you are actually trying to learn because he never completely finishes his problems and will never do examples.
Absolutely the worst grader I have ever had in my life. He doesn't go off a rubric and just takes off points when he feels like it. You write the page number in the wrong corner and you lost half the credit for the problem already. Horrible grader but his lectures were alright - you have to go to lecture if you want to understand anything though.
Dr Barker is a nice enough guy, and his class is straightforward to a point. Except, you have to do all of the problems in the way he wants them done. He makes that very very clear and shows that, though. Tests are similar to homework (homework sometimes graded, sometimes not). He's inconsistent and doesn't like teaching statics.
Took Dr. Barkers class for ME 202 (Statics). Started out fine could understand the concepts, took notes, the whole nine yards. Got a 47 on the first exam due to formatting. After I wasn't the only one who failed he said " do better next time" to the whole class. Stayed after class to learn his formatting with him and still failed.
One of the best professors I have ever had as far as lectures and personality, but doesnt give meaningful feedback on exams which make up 100% of the grade. Will he taking him again for future classes becuase of his lecture style. Explains concepts very throughly without overbearing amounts of equations or information.
Here's the weird thing about Barker, he is objectively good at presenting the material. The problem is he has such a oddly specific and ridiculous grading system that you will spend more time worrying about his formatting on exams rather than the material itself. He assigns homework, but provides no feedback and doesnt post solutions. Doesn't care.
Dr Barker is a solid choice for ME331, less so for ME202. He has a very strong preference for thermo that shows in his teaching. He grades pretty harshly, but he's very clear on what he's looking for when he's grading. Follow what he says and you'll be fine. A little intimidating, but Barker's a good prof who just wants to talk about thermo
I've never gotten below an A- in my life and Professor Barker was the first to give me a C! I worked extremely hard in the class and felt as though I knew the material but the tests were graded harder than any other teacher I've ever taken. You could get the correct answer ,but if all your work isn't perfect expect to at best get a C.
Dr. Barker is a good teacher that has gotten a bad rep. He definitely makes you work for your grade, but you do end up learning the material by the end of the class. Do your typical studying, and you should be fine. He does not tolerate excuses or laziness but he is a honest guy that cares about his students.
A couple of things about Barker: 1) His lectures are very good, but if you fall behind in notes taking, you will not have any way to complete them. 2) Homework ant tests are graded very harshly. If you mess up one test, you will fail the course. He refuses to provide worked out solutions, which makes it very hard to learn from your mistakes.
Extremely harsh grader. All exams are 3-4 problems, and he will give you a 0 on an entire problem if you don't use the correct base and symbolic equations. He refuses to give out exam or homework keys, and his feedback is minimal. All that being said, he makes himself available for help after class and his office hours were helpful.
Only grades on Exams, but he is very straightforward on what he expects you to know and how to do it. It is critical you do things "The Barker Way" or he may count off (just do it the same way he does it in class). Textbook isn't required but the tables in it are for studying/HW (which isn't for a grade). I take Barker for every class I can.
Whatever grade you think you earned on any of the 4 exams you take in this course, you can go ahead and subtract 30 from it and that will be the actual grade you receive for them. Dr. Barker is an amazing lecturer and will have you believing that you understand the material, but then will punch you in the face with his exam expectations.
Dr. Barker is a good choice for Heat Transfer. He's a good lecturer and easy to find outside of class. He is a tough grader and tells you what he expects to see during class. If you do the homework and exam problems the way he asks then you should do fine.
I take Barker for any class that he teaches. Not only does he know the material extremely well, he wants you to know it that well too. He is very picky on his grading, but if you go to all the classes, you'll know exactly what he is looking for. Anyone who says his grading desires isn't clear, doesn't go to class
Mr Barker's class is impossible if you don't pay attention to his lectures. But he is very clear on what he is grading and covers everything you need to know. Some students didn't like him because he's strict on his grading but he tells you exactly what he's looking for. If you know just the basic equations, you can get 60 on a test
Great lectures, genuinely takes feedback and tries to improve. However, grading is extremely punctual. You have to write down EVERYTHING if you don't want deductions. Lectures are also very important to pay attention to because he does not use external resources like canvas that much, and engineering textbooks are never a good way to learn.
Jon is more arrogant than he should be. Maybe once I saw him get a question right in class. Because of this its not worth going to class. I walked to class just to watch him only have time to do two problems and miss them both. He offers almost no feedback on any work. This class was a waste of time and money. The class AVG is low and then curved.
Professor Barker was a very fun professor. At times his lectures would drag on. I really appreciated his clear grading criteria because it helped maximize how to complete homework assignments and how to study for exams.
He is easy to understand and describes content clearly, but he a very tough grader. If you aren't careful, you can fail tests from simply writing your work down incorrectly, even if you get the correct answers. Work and answers need to be in a strict form. No exceptions. VERY limited feedback is given unless go out of your way.
Dr. Barker's lectures are decent, but he does not clearly define the format for tests or homework(optional) until you return them to him. So you will likely take a hit on your first grade regardless. Also, if taken online you will not be able to see your screen or tables because it will be bent in half to look at your hands and paper.
"If you say his grading is unclear you obviously don't go to class". No, his grading is honestly not that great, the entire semester's grade is determined on a max of around 16 questions over 4 exams. Unclear feedback. So: Anything but high 90's = bad grade on your GPA. Sarcastic in office hours = not helpful. Short & hard tests = tough class.
In depth lectures, clearly communicates what he's looking for in homework/exams. If taking EF152, this class basically just builds upon concepts already learned. However, he can be extremely rude and talk down on you without realizing it. Sometimes is very unreasonable and will not listen to what you have to say.
His lectures are good but he is an extremely tough grader. Tests are 100% of your grade and he grades them really hard but won't tell you what you did wrong. Do NOT take.
Usually A-B student so I hope this helps. You NEED the online textbook HW. The grade you receive is entirely off 3 exams. If you do bad on one, you're screwed. He's nice but does not upload anything to Canvas so TAKE GOOD NOTES. Organization is key! The problems are not hard they're just new concepts so do the HW on time and you'll be fine.
Super tough grader, don't use any algebra tricks, he will mark you down like crazy. Getting everything right on the test gets you basically no points, he REQUIRES that you write the algebraic equation. He isn't afraid to give negative points on tests.
Oh my goodness. I have NEVER made a C in my life. Barker is a tough grader. He gives very limited feedback on exams. Your grade is 90 percent exams so good luck with that! I failed the first one and it screwed me over. Good luck !
Dr. Barker is the concept of "show all work" to an extreme. You must follow his format, which is in depth and will take half the exam time to comply with. I have never struggled to finish an exam except in this class. The material is not difficult, his formatting requirements are absolutely brutal.
Barker is by FAR the worst professor I've ever had. You will leave an exam feeling good about it. In fact, you can even get every answer correct, and still get a 70. Barker will take points off without rhyme or reason. Miss an exponent? -10 points. Drop a negative sign? - 10 points. God forbid you make an honest mistake somewhere. -10 rating.
I may have gotten an A, but this teacher made it nearly impossible. Anyone giving him a high rating is lying to you. I wouldn't be surprised if he went in here and made those himself. I don't even have to say anything about Dr. Barker, read any one of his low ratings and it will hit the nail on the head. Avoid Dr. Barker at all costs.
Dr. Barker is an awful teacher. I took him in the spring, and have just gotten around to rating him. He grades extremely harshly, and even worse he is extremely creepy. As one of just a few women in engineering, I felt extremely uncomfortable being in the same room as him. For the sake of your grades and comfort avoid him by any means necessary.
I do not know how Dr. Barker has a rating of 3/5. If it were possible to give him a negative rating I would. And it would serve him right be. You have to do everything his way, and he'll make you jump through hoops to figure what exactly he wants. And by the time you figure it out, it will be too late because he'll completely change what he wants.
Barker is a great lecturer and generally a nice guy; however, his exams are all you're graded by and are not conductive to learning nor reflective of what you know. Never before have I studied so much and done so poorly on exams-- his grading is insane and unfair. First C I've ever received as well. I would recommend taking a different professor.
avoid no matter what
The lecturing was very well, however, they were very specific on the process of how things are done regardless of the answer being right.
Had to drop the class because I failed my 2nd exam, but he knew I understood the material, I just didn't follow directions. He explained material very well and stated what work he wanted to see. Just write down your formulas, follow directions, and you'll be fine. I will not give him a 5 simply because of grading, it's harsh. 90% of grade is exams.
Dr. Barker's grading is the worst out of any professor in the engineering program here and it is very difficult to avoid getting him in required classes such as Heat Transfer and Thermodynamics. If you get one wrong answer in any intermediate step you will lose FULL credit for anything after that uses that value. Take 20 points off what you expect.
His lectures were very good and it's important to be there if you wanna pass. He is very clear on the work he wants you to show on exams, if you follow it exactly you'll get a good grade. 90% of grade is on tests so if you study well and go to class you'll pass. Best ME202 prof in my opinion.
I've had Dr Barker for both statics and heat transfer and he is one of the best professors for engineering students. He gets a bad rap for his tough exams and grading, but he tells you what he wants and what to look out for on the tests. Your grade is made up entirely by exams, so study! He is a super nice guy and genuinely cares for his students.
He is unable to do anything online, there will be no materials for you outside of the classroom, so take notes. His grading criteria are very strict and arguably unfair, and too much of the grade is placed on exams.
Dr. Barker has a terrible reputation, and I honestly don't understand why. The tests were stupid easy because he made you VERY well aware of what he expected. I will be taking Barker again at every opportunity because I appreciate his very clear guidelines, his receptivity to questions, and his simple teaching style. He is QUITE picky, but fair.
Grade is 90% exams, so STUDY. Lectures were well done and he is receptive to questions; however, his grading has a reputation for good reason. If you make a mistake in the first part of the problem, he will count it against you for the remainder of the problem; while that is his prerogative, it makes his grading harsher than the other statics profs
You could correctly perform an entire problem and make a minor mistake that would cause him to give you no credit.
One of the best professors I have ever had. Incredibly good lecturer, walks you through every step of the many processes in Thermodynamics. Makes the very difficult material doable and understandable.
Dr. Barker is very straight forward and clear with what he wants and what he expects to see on homework and exams. If you go to class, do the homework, and pay attention, you will do well in his class. Lots of reviews say he is a harsh grader, and he takes off lots of points but if you DO WHAT HE ASKS you will be fine!! Definitely recommend!
Best lectures in engineering, but with the worst grading practices I've ever seen. Expect to learn a ton, but don't expect your grade to match that. You will get the right answers on exams, but get a D-B for it. You need to be able to read his mind to know where the goal posts are at any given moment, because he certainly isn't consistent.
Dr. Barker is a great professor. He breaks down the concepts so that they are easy to understand and is accessible outside of class. Yes, he is a tough grader, but he tells you exactly what he wants to see on homework and exams. As long as you go to class and pay attention, you will be fine.
Dr. Baker makes you think you know the material because his lectures are good, but his exams are terrible. If you do not know his method and do not write everything like he wants you will lose major points and small errors are a chunk of points. Even if your work and answers are right, you could lose 20 points on your exam just for formatting.
This guy is probably one of the best teachers. He explains everything pretty well, and he also tells you exactly what he wants to see on assignments. Do what he says, and you should be fine, you'll get used to it. Exams were 90% of the grade, though, and I will agree his grading is pretty rough. Some leniency would definitely be nice.
Going into the class, I knew his grading would be tough. The
Dr. Barker is the best professor I have ever had, and I really mean that. He genuinely cares if you show any form of actually trying in his class, and if you go to office hours he will go above and beyond to try and help you. Thermo is a hard class and requires a lot of studying, but Dr. Barker makes it much more tolerable and fun.
Dr.Barker has a reputation for being a tough grader and he lives up to it. His grading style is looking for specifics in the process of solving. Pay careful attention to what he wants to see in the work for the equations. Most of the difficulty is getting the process he wants into repetition but he is chill in office hours and gives good lectures.
I just wasn't the biggest fan.
Good God what a terrible excuse for a flagship University professor let alone in an engineering department. God forbid you have the audacity to ask a simple question to this man because he will be so sarcastic and condescending that you will start doubting why you even decided to go to college in the first place. Trade school seems nice now.
horrible professor, I failed because of his terrible grading. took the class next semester with a different professor, never went to class, and got a 96. I knew the entire course contents, barkers just a terrible grader
The material for this class is not difficult but the prof make it worse. While I don't love him, he tells you exactly what he wants you to do, and grades the homework in the same way he grades the tests. While a lot of this stuff is nit-picky, he is VERY clear about it. He is a little condescending at times but it is sometimes warranted.
avoid him if you can. Tests are 100% of the grade and he grades them mercilessly. If your answers are not formatted EXACTLY how he expects he will destroy you. Tests also aren't very similar to the homeworks and class problems imo. He's a good lecturer and a nice guy but easily the worst grader I have had. Just don't take him
Dr. Barker is EXTREMELY stingy with grading, but he tells you exactly what he is looking for multiple times in the lectures. He is a solid lecturer but I will say some of the material requires a bit of background knowledge which shouldnt be an issue since this isnt a first sem class. If you treat this class like a 3 credit class you will pass.
Dr. Barker has a straightforward teaching style. He's clear about what he expects, and if you follow his guidance, you can do well. The exams are challenging, but using resources like unstuck AI can help with study prep.
The Jarker is Goated
He will show up late to class. When he starts talking he will be wrong.
At utk, the 202 is as hard as the professor wants it to be. For the most part you're going to get a teacher that cant teach, a teacher that makes it stupid hard, or you'll get barker. He's a good lecturer, easy tests/homework, but an insanely picky grader. It is beyond obvious what he expects and if you go to class and take notes, an A is easy.
This was my first class with Barker. INCREDIBLE lectures. Genuinely knows his stuff. Hard, optional HW, but vital for learning. Tests ALMOST PERFECTLY reflected in-class examples and homework problems... nothing out of left field. Very picky grading when it comes to following his problem-solving method. Always write base equations, like for area.
Do not take Barker. Exams are worth 90% of the grade, and he doesn't allow students to take pictures of any in-class problems or worked examples. He doesn't even post grades (which you calculate yourself), lesson material, or offer redemption. Forget having ADD or ADHD if you take his class, accidentally miss notes, and your grade suffers.
At first I got 50 on first test i would say his grading is tough but also it was my fault he keeps saying review class notes which I didn't do for the first test, but i did for the second test and the final and i got B+ in both. what I like about him he is straight forward about what you need to do just follow his instructions and you will do good
Took his thermodynamics course online. Grade was decided by 3 tests. He's extraordinarily picky about what he wants you to write, but is clear about it. Optional homework that got me the grade I did. He is tough, but you will walk out of the class with a great understanding of the material if you just grind it out.
He grades exams very harshly if you don't follow his format, and he is very strict about the way he does things. He also does not post notes online, so you really have to be paying attention in lecture. That said, he is very good at teaching, and he posts video solutions for all the homework problems, which are extremely helpful.
Professor is tough, but gives you every opportunity to succeed. Always friendly and kind to those who are trying in his class.
Dr. Barker is a great professor! I took him for both Statics and Thermo and I liked him for both. His grading is tough, but he literally tells you EXACTLY what he wants to see on HW/exams. All of his bad reviews just seem like people that didn't show up to class and didn't pay attention IMO. I would recommend Barker to anyone!
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
43%
Textbook Required
39%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.63 avg changeRatings by Course
ME344
3.3
(24)ME331
3.2
(33)MSE20028284
3.0
(1)ME202
2.9
(64)ME336
1.5
(2)Difficulty by Course
ME336
5.0
ME331
4.2
ME344
4.2
ME202
3.9
MSE20028284
3.0