2.6

Judith Nylvek

Linguistics - University of Victoria

2.6
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
47%
Would Retake
149
Reviews
2.6
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
2.4
Helpful
2.7
Clarity

47%

Would Retake

149

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

16

4

32

3

28

2

38

1

35

What Students Say

It is unfortunate that she may turn many students away from a great subject

LING100A - 1.0 rating

As a teacher coming to Canada for certification, Judith Nylvek is a wonderful practitioner at exemplifying what not to do in a classroom

LING388 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

70%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

83% confidence
Based on 11 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
C+ (2)
Rather_Not_Say (1)
Grade Distribution
A(6)B(1)C(2)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 12 reported grades
A: 6
C+: 2
Rather_Not_Say: 1
A-: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (6)
Tough Grader (5)
Participation matters (5)
Skip class? You won't pass. (4)
Tough grader (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (2)
Lots of homework (2)
Graded by few things (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.39 avg change
Jan
Jun
Dec
Dec
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

LING10038

5.0

(1)

LING100AB388

5.0

(1)

LINGUISTICS100

5.0

(1)

LING388100390

5.0

(1)

LING100AB

4.2

(5)
+20 more courses
Difficulty by Course

GRAMMAR388

5.0

ENG388

5.0

395

4.0

12046

4.0

LING391

4.0

Reviews (149)
3.0
2.0
LING100
Oct 31, 2002

Monotone voice, very boring class. Bring your pillows and MP3 players !

2.0
3.0
LING
Nov 20, 2002

This teaching does NOT want to teach us. No enthusiasm, no energy, boring.

4.0
1.0
LING100A
Nov 29, 2002

Monotone voice, but she's really nice and understanding! Give her a chance!

2.0
3.0
LING100
Nov 29, 2002

Awful teacher. Doesn't want to be there, mean to people who ask questions

5.0
3.0
LING100
Nov 30, 2002

Doesn't really want to be there, but is cool by me cause she loves dogs.:)

2.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 4, 2002

Fairly easy course, but not a very enthusiastic, stimulating prof!!

3.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 5, 2002

Mostly monotonous with odd bursts of energy. Sometimes fun.

1.0
2.0
100
Dec 6, 2002

Boooo.

2.0
1.0
100
Dec 6, 2002

stay at home, read the text - that's all she does in class

5.0
3.0
LING10038
Dec 6, 2002

She was my 1st LING prof, really turned me onto the subject. Is she Magyar?

4.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 8, 2002

good teacher, can be funny at times

2.0
3.0
LING100
Dec 11, 2002

OMG could she BE any less enthusiastic?

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 13, 2002

I thought she was a great teacher! And she wasn't always monotoned!

1.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 13, 2002

Worst teacher i've had!

1.0
3.0
100A
Dec 18, 2002

this woman is HORRIBLE!! ps. if R. Dyck is TA she is even worse (if poss.)

2.0
4.0
100A
Dec 30, 2002

Lectured straight out of the book. Made me drop the class out of boredom.

3.0
2.0
LING100A
Jan 2, 2003

Not particularly interesting, but I don't think she's as bad as others have said

4.0
2.0
LING100
Jan 9, 2003

Great Prof, bad rep...i learned alot

1.0
4.0
LING100
Jan 11, 2003

Worst professor in the history of proffessors. You can't hear a things she says.

4.0
2.0
LING388
Jan 24, 2003

Lectures out of the text, forces class participation- so do homework!

2.0
1.0
LING100A
Jan 26, 2003

How can anyone say she was anything but horrible !!??

3.0
3.0
100AB
Feb 10, 2003

likes dogs, talks quietly... the only course i've ever REALLY slept in!

1.0
1.0
LING100
Feb 19, 2003

No Comments

3.0
2.0
LING100A
Mar 6, 2003

Her lectures were horrible (where's the enthusiasm in the subject matter?) She turned me away from ever taking Ling again.

5.0
1.0
LING100AB
Apr 9, 2003

I can't believe everyone is being so hard on her! If you'd just pay attention in class and listen to her, everything would be more interesting. She makes quiet jokes, so sit up front and it's a lot better

4.0
1.0
LING100AB
Apr 10, 2003

Sometimes she could be a tad bit boring, however, when she did not read directly from the text she was very good. Her tests are fairly easy as long as you know the material.

3.0
2.0
LING100B
Apr 14, 2003

WOW, award for the most unenthusiastic prof in the world. If you read the text, you don't even need to go to the class. She tells you almost exactly what's on the tests before you write it, so that's pretty nice.

1.0
4.0
LING100A
May 13, 2003

BOOOORING!!!!!!!

3.0
1.0
LING100AB
Jun 27, 2003

Not on the path to Linguistic Fame, completely unenthusiastic, lame jokes, ok to take class with - if you're in Saskatchewan. (Pssst, go home)

1.0
2.0
LING100A
Sep 12, 2003

she's a rude person and discourages participation with her unenthusiam

1.0
5.0
LING100A
Oct 8, 2003

This class is so horrible - not even Nylvek wants to be there! Its like she picked the shortest straw and is taking her anger out on us. She teaches out of the study guide and is incredibly discouraging and rude to students. I do not recommend!

1.0
3.0
LING388
Oct 21, 2003

She is so unapproachable and scary. She is unkind and I would never go to her for help because I would be afraid of being made to feel stupid.

1.0
3.0
LING100
Oct 29, 2003

Oh god. Don't get me started.

3.0
2.0
LING100
Oct 30, 2003

Judith is like linguistics, you love it and you hate it. Sometimes she is just so funny and sarcastic and witty. And when she is grumpy its funny too! Its worth coming to the class just to see how long you can stay awake by punching each other in the face

3.0
3.0
LING100
Oct 30, 2003

No Comments

4.0
1.0
LING101A
Oct 31, 2003

Judy gets to the point, she doesn't mess around, she lets you know if you are wrong, and she knows a lot about linguistics. Some people don't like her because she is grumpy, but she can't be showing off such a lovely smile all the time.

2.0
3.0
LING100A
Oct 31, 2003

No Comments

1.0
4.0
LING100A
Nov 2, 2003

Monotonous, you want to sleep in class. Gets upset if you don't have the right answer.

1.0
5.0
LING388
Dec 1, 2003

OH MY GOD! What is Jude still doing here? The most horrible teacher and class..she doesn't want to be there and could care less about our sucess!! URGH what a pill!

2.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 4, 2003

Her teaching delivery is painfully monotonous and she can be somewhat cantankerous at times... fortunately, I was interested enough in the subject matter to stick this one out, coz if I wasn't, I'd be outta there in a real hurry!

4.0
5.0
LING100A
Dec 10, 2003

Contrary to popular opinion, Judith is quite approachable, and can even be friendly! She may seem tough, but but at least she has control of the class and she knows everything possible about the subject. I think she deserves a little more credit.

2.0
4.0
LING388
Dec 19, 2003

Appeared to not like teaching this course; it was as painful for her as it was for the students. This is a self-taught course, don't expect to learn much in class.

4.0
3.0
LING388
Dec 20, 2003

I dont think, Judith was nearly as bad as people say. So you don't like analytical grammar? You don't like my peaches, don't shake my tree! A little grammar never hurt anyone.

2.0
4.0
LING100
Feb 5, 2004

If you can ignore her breathing difficulties and the monotone voice and have an actual interest in how language is produced and understood by humans then you'll be Judy's #1 fan...everyone else in this class HATES her. Oh don't forget your study guide!

2.0
2.0
LING100
Feb 19, 2004

Judith Nylvek may have been born at night, but it certainly wasn't last night!! You're not in grade three anymore. It's time to look past things like breathing problems and hamster-like features, especially if you're aiming for a PhD in syntax!!

4.0
3.0
LING390
Mar 5, 2004

i like her! it may appear she doesn't want to be in class, but i think she does. knows language very well! all material is straight from text/workbook, makes class comprehension /home studying easier.

2.0
2.0
LING100A
Mar 9, 2004

Mylanta. Dr. Nylvek is far too monotone, assigns and reviews a lot of homework and uses painfully long overheads to teach. On my way to an F for sure. Hurray.

4.0
1.0
LING100B
Grade: C+
Mar 16, 2004

For anyone in Ling 100A, Judy is way cooler in Ling 100B. On a scale of 1 to awesome, Judy is definitely super cool.

2.0
3.0
LING100B
Jun 9, 2004

she was boring in 100b, but nowhere near as bad as she was in 100a. you might as well just take a self-paced class, because you'll sleep right through hers.

5.0
3.0
388
Jun 15, 2004

If you don't want to work to get a good mark then why even bother coming to University! This prof makes you work for your mark so quit whining and start studying. Her tests are a fair reflection of the course material and the amount of effort you put in.

3.0
2.0
LING100A
Jul 14, 2004

She's okay as long as you don't ask for help. She seems to get grumpy if you ask questions during office hours or by email. She teaches right from the text. I hate that...why pay tuition if I'm just going to have the text read to me???

1.0
3.0
100A
Jul 16, 2004

Wow. She spent the class droning on and on glancing out the window and sighing. Thoroughly did not want to be teaching, and I rarely went to class. by far the worst class i've taken. BUT, she was approachable so whatever.

3.0
4.0
388
Aug 4, 2004

a two hour class, full or extremly boring, difficult grammar, and no break. After 20 minutes my brain has left the building, and is given no chance to return. VERY BORING

4.0
1.0
388
Aug 13, 2004

boring class, but taught clearly enough

5.0
3.0
LING100B
Aug 17, 2004

She isn't very enthusiastic, I think she's a bit shy. She covers most of the material and gives good grounds for following ling courses. Her tests are fair and she is very helpful.

1.0
3.0
LING100A
Oct 12, 2004

Fifty people have dropped out of the class. I think that says it all.

5.0
1.0
LING100A
Oct 31, 2004

The breathing into the mike is pretty bad, but you get used to it. All the tests and e-homework is so easy, that it is impossible to fail this class. She really gets into it, and makes fun of stupid people too. It's great.

5.0
1.0
LING100AB
Feb 23, 2005

Extremely helpful if you ask questions outside of class time. Hard to concentrate on her pure lectures at times, but on the days where these are broken up by other activities it isn't a problem.

2.0
3.0
LING100B
Mar 24, 2005

She becomes disgruntled if you ask for help, or propose a topic that's different from her proposed topics. She always accentuates the negative, and teaches right from the textbook. Find someone else if you can.

1.0
5.0
GRAMMAR388
Mar 29, 2005

oh god ...... do not ask her a question

1.0
5.0
ENG388
Mar 29, 2005

Shes a terrible instructor. Very supercilious and condescending. Let me tell you I wouldn't sit through her class again if someone paid ME.

1.0
5.0
LING388
Apr 12, 2005

this teacher is horrible, she is not interested in teaching and it reflects in her attitude. By far the sh!tt!est teacher in uvic

4.0
2.0
LING100AB
Apr 13, 2005

In 100B she was friendlier and better at answering questions than in 100A, perhaps because the class was smaller. In 100B you watch a lot of interesting movies, but the lectures are kind of boring. If you read the textbook it's not hard to get a good mark. I don't think she's as bad as people say.

5.0
3.0
LING100AB388
May 26, 2005

To get the most out of Dr. Nylvek--sit up front. She actually has a wicked sense of humour, but you only catch that in the first few rows. She knows her stuff and expects you to do your work too, and can be hard on those who slack off. 100A is hard because it's a huge lecture hall with tons of students--not the best enviro, but that's how 1yr goes.

2.0
1.0
LING100
Jun 14, 2005

Easy to ace this course, but so BORING!! Make sure you bring your pillow.

2.0
2.0
LING100B
Jul 13, 2005

No Comments

4.0
2.0
LING195
Oct 25, 2005

If you listen in Dr. Nylvek's class and actually do the assignments, you do fine. She's very flexible with due dates and her assignments are fun. She's also funny, but you miss it if you're hiding in the back of class!

4.0
2.0
LING100A
Oct 28, 2005

She's actually a pretty helpful teacher. Her notes and lecture are easy to understand. However she does expect you to be prepared for class.

3.0
3.0
LING100B
Dec 6, 2005

Worst professor ever. She was extremely boring and very unhelpful.

5.0
1.0
LINGUISTICS100
Jan 25, 2006

Nice lady, interesting lectures if you're really into linguistics..very helpful, a little bit monotone..but overall she's really good.

3.0
3.0
LING388
Feb 6, 2006

Seriously so boring, reading the textbook on your own is more beneficial!

3.0
3.0
100A
Feb 19, 2006

I really disliked the course material. If you don't like puzzles, this may not be for you. At first she seems really grouchy. She takes a while to warm up to. By the time the course was done I could see she was just a "softie" with a gruff exterior. She is a SNL sketch just waiting to happen. I liked her, but really really disliked the course.

2.0
4.0
LING100
Sep 5, 2006

Boring

5.0
5.0
LING100
Oct 24, 2006

This prof really knows her subject inside and out. Not sure if she finds it interesting herself, which makes it hard for students to find interesting. Occasionally humorous, but overall monotone prof. Go to the tutorials, they are so much more in-depth.

5.0
3.0
LING388
Nov 1, 2006

Great prof! She has a dry sense of humour that some people don't get. If you do your assignments and actually come to class you'll be fine. READ INSTRUCTIONS ON TESTS!!!!

2.0
4.0
LING100
Nov 7, 2006

Most horrible class experience ever!!!!!!!!!!

2.0
2.0
LING195
Nov 8, 2006

This prof has a profound ability to make even the most interesting topic dull.

3.0
2.0
LING100A
Nov 15, 2006

she is quite boring and monotone. first 5 or so classes i wanted to shoot myself but then got used to it. she knows her material well but seems very bored and irritated at life. do the readings and learn the charts and definitions and you're sure to get at least a B+

2.0
2.0
LING195
Nov 22, 2006

we never actually got to the topic 'grammar in society'- the name of the course

1.0
1.0
LING388
Nov 28, 2006

Despite the horridity that is this class, I have learned one valuable lesson. As I am going to school to learn how to be a teacher, Judith has taught me exactly what NOT to do!

2.0
4.0
LING195
Dec 5, 2006

I had been so intrigued by the course description but Dr. Nylvek and her lack of enthusiasm ruined it for me. Sure, there were some great discussions that gave me momentary hope that the class would turn out for the better... but Dr. Nylvek's lack of desire to teach us anything of interest ruined everything.

1.0
1.0
LING195
Dec 7, 2006

I was genuinely excited about the content of this course, but Judith managed to completely drain the enthusiasm out of the topic. The textbook (verbal hygiene) was 1000 times more interesting. Skip the class, read the daily recaps that she posts, and google the stuff on your own.

4.0
2.0
LING195
Dec 11, 2006

Nice and knowlegeable prof. Classes were interesting, and fun. Nylvek has a great sense of humour if you sit near the front of the class. The textbook was much more boring than her lessons--she tried to spruce the content with class discussions and videos. Learned more about grammar than in high school!

1.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 13, 2006

Terrible.

5.0
3.0
LING100A
Jan 3, 2007

Dr. Judith Nylvek, monotone, drained the enthusiasm in LING 100A. The H/W and M/Ts were fair; however, the final exam was REDICULOUS. The F/E had many questions that we covered in 1-3 lectures. I failed the course because of that. There were not many, but some, questions on the final that we spent more lectures on. I studied stuff not on the exam!

3.0
3.0
LING100B
May 11, 2007

Horrible. Going to class equals to listening to her read word-for-word directly out of the text in a monotone.Assignments were pretty pointless too.

4.0
1.0
LING100A
Oct 29, 2007

She's fine as a teacher, exactly what I expected in a university prof, maybe even a little better. Easy midterms, easy hw..just study the textbook and do a lot of the exercises in the study guide and you'll do fine.

3.0
3.0
LIN100A
Nov 8, 2007

Oh my God!!! Please don't take this class if you don't have to. I've never had a more boring, uninspiring teacher (and I've been in school for a long time). Sure, she's nice enough but is clearly not that interested in linguistics. Sitting in class is like pulling teeth but you will do fine if you go and do all the exercises.

3.0
2.0
LING100A
Jan 3, 2008

I was fine with the class until we got to the final exam. For some reason, the testing format was changed, and anything that I had studied for was virtually a) incomprehensible, or b) not on the test at all. That really turned me off - GRRR!!. Now I have to retake the class because I'm in Honours and the final killed my A- after hours of studying.

1.0
3.0
LING100B
Apr 3, 2008

I don't know if I can continue studying linguistics after having this teacher. She killed it for me.

3.0
5.0
LING388
Jun 2, 2008

Expect to study a lot and do work out of class to understand the material. Tutorials help.

2.0
3.0
LING390
Jun 27, 2008

Such an fascinating topic, I can't believe how boring she made it. She was so vague about what was on the tests that we were all mystified. She spent most of the class chatting to her favourites in the front about their weekends. She refused to answer questions about exams by email and I will NEVER suffer through another of her courses. AVOID HER!!

1.0
4.0
LING100
Jul 18, 2008

Going to her class is painful. She clearly has no passion for linguistics nor does she have the desire to teach it. Talks in monotone the whole time and rolls her eyes at questions. It's obvious that teaching is just a paycheque to her. AVOID AVOID AVOID

5.0
2.0
LING100
Jul 30, 2008

Lectures are clear and concise. Not the most fascinating class, but that's just my opinion. Easy to do well in this class with a bit of effort. I agree that she's not the most inspiring lecturer, but she's not terrible either. Overall, a positive experience.

4.0
2.0
LING388
Oct 15, 2008

Think you know your grammar? She'll test your assumptions. Okay, so you might feel like a dufus but it's better to speak up than be quiet, which was the majority of the class. This class begs for more participation to perk up interest. Dry humour, yes, but she needs some energy! I'd take another course from her, now that I know what she's like.

4.0
1.0
LING395
Jul 23, 2009

Although seems dry and uninspiring at first, is actually just unwilling to unnecessarily devote energy to people who couldn't care less about the class. Is a fantastic teacher with vast linguistic knowledge and experience when you are engaged and attentive in class.

2.0
5.0
LING100
Jun 16, 2010

...how to describe this prof... Like an unsalted premium plus cracker. My degree was going to be in Linguistics until I took this class. Hello Geography! If you want to keep your major as Linguistics, AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!!

4.0
2.0
LING100A
Jul 16, 2010

Her lectures are clear, she is fair with work and she gets the job done, but I can't say she's a particularly engaging lecturer. She puts useful resources on the blackboard site and is good about clarifying in class.

1.0
5.0
LING388
Jul 27, 2010

Possibly the worst linguistics course I've ever taken. The tests are purposefully designed to trick students and are harder than anything seen in the textbook or in class. The entire course appears to be designed in order to accommodate the prof's weird psychological need for validation through the confusion of her students. Avoid this class!

4.0
3.0
LING100
Oct 3, 2010

This prof is hard to describe. In my opinion, she's easy to judge. She comes across kind of cold, and rude at first.. but then as class goes on a bit more you realize that she is extremely knowledgeable and is simply just being straight-foward. She doesn't exactly engage very much and definitely keeps things impersonal, but I'd suggest her for sure

3.0
3.0
LING100A
Oct 20, 2010

Despite an obviously vast knowledge of the material, her presentation is pretty flat. She'll generally whip through slides, leaving you little time to take even point-form notes, and gives off an unapproachable air. Most students are afraid to ask or answer questions, unless they really, really know the material. She can be tough, but is fair.

2.0
5.0
LING100
Nov 25, 2010

Very difficult and not very helpful. Has a tendency to not explain things in a way that helps the students understand - instead she'll look at you and just repeat what she said, instead of clarifying. She played a major role in my decreasing interest in linguistics.

2.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 20, 2010

She was quite unfriendly and inapproachable.

1.0
3.0
LING100A
Jan 19, 2011

Horrible Prof.. She goes through the slides so fast you have no chance of writing them down, and doesnt believe in putting them online. Makes you feel useless if you ask a question. Taught myself the entire course. This is not an easy course, so I dont recommend taking Ling 100A with Nylvek.

2.0
3.0
LING392
Apr 16, 2011

I will avoid her in the future. She was never properly prepared for lectures and was very scattered. Instructions were never clear. One big assignment which we didn't really know how to complete. When asked questions, answers were very vague.

2.0
3.0
LING392
Apr 27, 2011

TERRIBLE prof. Class was a waste of time and we didn't start covering 'Canadian English' until about the last 3 classes. Midterm was fair but final was incredibly hard. She was useless when you asked a question. Final research project was a major headache. She was very unclear and I ended up doing terrible on it. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS WITH HER!

4.0
1.0
LING392
Jun 8, 2011

Unlike what other people have been saying, I really enjoy Judith's classes. The research project was something new she tried, so she was learning along with you. She is very friendly and helpful if you make an effort in her class. Answer her questions and ask questions & you will do just fine. Got an A+ in both her classes.

2.0
5.0
LING100A
Sep 28, 2011

I found this course extremely difficult and unclear. I'm not sure if it's Judith or the actual course but the content is over the top and my interest in this course went from high to extremely low. She has a monotone voice and is VERY difficult to pay attention to. I do not recommend taking this course.

2.0
5.0
LING388
Nov 8, 2011

Not the greatest prof. Tests were extremely difficult even if you attended the tutorials led by the awesome TA. Think you know your stuff? Prepare to have your self esteem bashed.

2.0
3.0
LING100A
Nov 23, 2011

Not an engaging teacher at all. She gets it done. Do not expect much.

4.0
1.0
LING388
Dec 1, 2011

Judith is well organized, very clear and quite funny if you pay attention! She may be a little monotone, but she is very nice and consistent. The material was hard, but if you put effort and time into studying, the tests will seem easy. Going to class is not enough, you have to practice over and over. Tests will be easy if you put in the time!

2.0
4.0
LING100A
Dec 12, 2011

SHE knows what SHE is teaching and doesn't seem very interested in making sure you get it as well. Monotone, unclear, and is constantly complicating the material through her "explanations". If you were to stick to the textbook and study on your own without attending class, you'd actually get more from the course (which is sad). Would not recommend.

1.0
5.0
LING388
Dec 19, 2011

Judith is exactly what you don't want in a teacher. If you must take this course, you better be ready to study for hours on every chapter and still get a B-. This course is not useful, unless you want to analyze grammar. Judith is not useful unless you want to get some sleep at school. The TA is awesome though!

4.0
4.0
LING195
May 8, 2012

Very dull, doesn't show interest in others' opinions but still expects you to contribute to class. Her presentation assignment was useless and inconsistent with what she was teaching but the other two assignments were well thought out, though she marked tough. She is slow at getting assignments back, some you will never see again.

1.0
5.0
LING100A
Jun 9, 2012

She is monotone and reads off her notes and she gives her notes to us as lecture notes and posts them on moodle. You basically could skip class but she takes attendance and does in class participation exercises. AVOID HER IF YOU CAN.

2.0
4.0
LING388
Aug 2, 2012

She is very monotone, but does try to make jokes even if they're not that funny. Everyone laughs, I think it gets you brownie points. Class is very tough. I would NOT recommend taking in the summer session. Not enough time, she goes very fast. Participation exercises are graded. Kind of an intimidating prof.

4.0
4.0
LING100B
Apr 12, 2013

I think Dr. Nylvek gets an undeserved bad rap. She can seem "unfriendly" but she really isn't. She's quite nice and helpful if you show interest in the subject and put effort into it. She's especially good in LING 100B as opposed to 100A. I think she might enjoy those topics a bit more and it makes class more fun. She really knows her stuff.

2.0
4.0
395
Apr 17, 2013

she stated right in class that previous students she had disliked that she would try to give them the worst marks she could. For some reason she decided I was one of them, I am an A average student and she gave me Cs. She would ask for opinions and shoot them down. very closed minded and has favours students which reflects in the grades

5.0
2.0
LING388100390
Apr 7, 2014

I love this prof. She is wrongly judged. She is actually quite funny once you get to know her and she is very intelligent. I have had her for three classes. I am an average B student but she provides lecture notes on moodle and great study guides so with her I have always received an A. Love her, just be patient with getting to know her demeanour.

3.0
4.0
LING100A
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Jun 22, 2014

Avoid taking her for your linguistics requirement. Thanks to her I don't like linguistics as much anymore. She seems to prefer linguistics majors, does not go out of her way to help you understand concepts. She relies mainly on the course study guide, did not have the text on reserve (not helpful if you are on a budget).

1.0
4.0
LING100A
Oct 17, 2014

Seems very unenthusiastic about her job. Gives pop quizzes all the time. Is rude to students who ask her questions. She makes what should be my favourite class a very negative experience. I'm very disappointed with her because I pay a lot of money to go to school. It is unfortunate that she may turn many students away from a great subject.

3.0
4.0
388
Dec 3, 2014

Read your textbook and do all of the in-chapter practice questions. Judith gives you a participation exercise almost every class. The content is boring, but if you don't show up to class you simply won't pass the exams. She is a tough grader and tries to slip you up on some questions in the exam. Read exam questions carefully!

2.0
4.0
12046
Dec 8, 2014

Hard to follow along in lectures. Learned nothing from her, I had to self teach.

4.0
3.0
100A
Dec 15, 2014

Very well organized. Not a hard marker. Go to class, do homework, you'll be fine. Really knows what she's talking about. Study guides helpful for exams. A bit monotonous but actually funny. Loves dogs :) I'm not a linguistics major and I liked her class. I think people are basing their opinions on her demeanour and not on her teaching ability.

2.0
5.0
LING388
Dec 20, 2014

As a teacher coming to Canada for certification, Judith Nylvek is a wonderful practitioner at exemplifying what not to do in a classroom. Feedback: Nylvek's teaching style lacks any form of positive feedback. Motivation: her attitude sucks the motivation from her students Evaluation: her marking schema is not effective and overly harsh.

2.0
5.0
100A
Dec 20, 2014

I am a international teacher currently enrolled at uvic and Dr. Nylvek taught me a lot of things, none of which related to the class material. She teaching style exemplified everything I learned not to do while in training. Chastising students, lack of teaching compassion, stifling atmosphere and teacher ennui are her calling cards.

4.0
3.0
LING100B
May 6, 2015

Funny, gives clear notes in class, very interesting material! Would recommend.

1.0
4.0
LING100A
Grade: A-
Jul 9, 2015

Terrible, will NOT take her course anymore and does NOT like linguistic amymore. She hate electronic devices so don't use phones during her class. It is unfair for International students, they cannot search words they don't understand. If she found that you are using phones, she will be angry and shout to you rudely.

3.0
4.0
LING195
Grade: C+
Apr 13, 2016

Dr. Nylvek is a very nice woman and interesting to speak with outside of class but she has extremely strict rules about any technology in her classroom. She is a very tough marker, exams are not by any means easy and the average grade for my class was 65%. If you do not attend her classes you will not pass.

3.0
3.0
LING100B
Apr 25, 2016

I really like Judith as she seems relatively down to earth. Something about her makes me feel like she's been through a lot in her life. She just seems sad a lot. All that aside, she is one of the best linguistics profs at UVic. Knowledgeable, will answer questions, doesn't give tons of homework. Tests are hard, but she provides study guides.

1.0
4.0
LIN100A
Jun 8, 2016
Wouldn't take again

She wont allow cellphones or laptops because of the distractions they can cause as well as the fact that you can't draw the symbols with a laptop, so don't show up with one. PSA - don't spend extra for the online access code in a new text book. The online material is EXACTLY what is in the text/study book; no extra readings available or answers.

4.0
3.0
LIN100A
Grade: A
Dec 26, 2016
Would take again

Great teacher. Funny and straightforward. If you want easy "do nothing" class, this isn't the class for you. She made Linguistics fun.

Tough Grader
Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
3.0
5.0
LING388
Grade: D
Dec 30, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Super hard material, poor at explaining, picky when grading, do not recommend

Tough Grader
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
LING392
Jun 28, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Judith is an absolutely lovely lady. As much as I do enjoy her, I had a hard time following her lectures. Textbook had 90% of lecture materials, but lectures didn't help me retain info. I felt like I was drowning in the factual information. It would be wise to re-organise notes/handouts in a more digestible way. Use handouts for most of the course.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
3.0
LING395
Sep 26, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Do yourself a favour and avoid this prof. Engages class by standing at front staring and reading her notes, rarely looks up boring. Test questions poorly written; multiple interpretations but only one right answer. Intimidates students who ask questions in class. Requires private office visits and then forgets what she tells you.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
3.0
LING100A
Grade: B-
Jun 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Took LING 100A first year, and it was one of the worst classes I ever took. Rude, insipid professor. Exams and test questions could be interpreted in several ways but there was only one right answer to her. When confronted about possible solutions or questions she was defensive and unhelpful. I would suggest not to take this course with this prof.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
5.0
LING100A
Aug 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I tried to take LING 100A w/ Judith but dropped it by how awful of a professor she is. She gave me hard time about my accommodations I have through CAL. We weren't allowed laptops to take notes. Note taking by hand is extremely difficult for me (no note takers avail). I had to drop 3 courses in 2nd term b/c of her & now have an extra year of degree

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
3.0
2.0
LING100B
Jan 22, 2019
Would take again

CONS: Every class Judith would read off slides that contained information that could be found in our textbooks. -Sometimes her responses to questions can make one feel dumb or disrespected but I don't think she means any harm PROS: LING100B was not difficult. Very fair tests and assignments.

4.0
4.0
LING388
Jan 22, 2019
Would take again

A difficult class but I learnt a lot. She's passionate and knowledgeable about grammar, the thing is she can appear grumpy and make u feel dumb when u ask a question but she's actually pretty nice. The tests were difficult if you find the class difficult but cover content and exercises from in class and the textbook.

5.0
1.0
LING392
Jun 5, 2019
Would take again

This course didn't have any structure at all. Using the textbook is essential to succeed. There were few prepared power points so it was taught verbally. However, Judith gave out great summaries of what to prepare for exams which made it easy to study. Tests and grading were VERY fair. I really recommend Judith despite everything else being said.

1.0
3.0
100A
Jun 30, 2019
Wouldn't take again

With Judith teaching you nearly fall asleep, she does not make her classes exciting and reads off of the slides which is literally straight from the book. Only reason I always ended up going to class was because everyday she does Iclicker questions.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
4.0
LING100A
Dec 7, 2019
Would take again

Judith acts like she couldn't care less about what she's teaching, she's so monotone and dry its funny. When people ask questions she also seems very condescending, but I don't think she means to be, its just her vibe. You aren't allowed laptops or phones and you can't take pictures of anything, I'm surprised we didn't have to sign a NDA.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
100A
Grade: A
Dec 24, 2019
Would take again

The class was interesting, she goes through slides quickly but as long as you pay attention youll be fine. Seems kinda grumpy at first but genuinely wants us to succeed. In-class exercises really helped my understanding.

Participation matters
Beware of pop quizzes
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
LIN100A
Grade: A
Dec 15, 2020
Would take again

ONLINE: The amount of new content you're required to learn is overwhelming at first. The slides she uploads every week are not very detailed and there is no synchronous classes you're required to attend so I ended up relying heavily on the textbook. Optional Zoom sessions on Fridays to go over exercises. Overall easy course.

Lots of homework
Graded by few things
2.0
3.0
LING100A
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Took this class during the first full semester during the pandemic so it was all online. I actually didn't really feel like Nylvek played any active part in my learning. It was a very much teach yourself type of class (text, slide pdf.'s, etc.) which for this type of course wasn't too bad, I think.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
1.0
4.0
LING391
Dec 16, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Yikes. This semester was entirely online and this course was asynchronous. The only "lecture" content she provided was a pdf. version of her slides - no voice over or explanations. The rest was reading 100's of pages from 3 different books. I pretty much taught myself. Quiz q's also ambiguous.

Lots of homework
Participation matters
So many papers
3.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 12, 2021
Would take again

Class was asynchronous. Judith isn't very personable so it is hard to communicate with her, I mainly asked the TAs for help. You can tell she has the best intentions, so maybe communication would be better in-person. The course itself is enjoyable and has its ups (morphology and syntax) and downs (phonetics).

Get ready to read
1.0
2.0
LING100A
Grade: A
Dec 23, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I took this course as an easy A, which is true. But I entirely taught myself this course. It seems like the online format is not suitable for her and she only really posted (horrible) slides and gave us textbook readings with the occasional 5 minute video and an optional Friday zoom session that isnt anything you cant do yourself.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
LING388
Grade: A
Jan 9, 2022
Would take again

Asynchronous with optional Zoom meetings. She posts weekly material (slides, video recordings showing how to diagram different structures, additional readings). Grammar can be difficult no matter who your prof is... either you get it or you don't :)

Test heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

70%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

83% confidence
Based on 11 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
C+ (2)
Rather_Not_Say (1)
Grade Distribution
A(6)B(1)C(2)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 12 reported grades
A: 6
C+: 2
Rather_Not_Say: 1
A-: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (6)
Tough Grader (5)
Participation matters (5)
Skip class? You won't pass. (4)
Tough grader (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (2)
Lots of homework (2)
Graded by few things (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.39 avg change
Jan
Jun
Dec
Dec
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

LING10038

5.0

(1)

LING100AB388

5.0

(1)

LINGUISTICS100

5.0

(1)

LING388100390

5.0

(1)

LING100AB

4.2

(5)
+20 more courses
Difficulty by Course

GRAMMAR388

5.0

ENG388

5.0

395

4.0

12046

4.0

LING391

4.0

Similar Professors