2.8
Quality3.4
Difficulty33%
Would Retake88
Reviews33%
Would Retake
88
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
88 total ratings5
22
4
14
3
6
2
16
1
30
What Students Say
“Karen is not a great lecturer; quality akin to high-school presentations”
ENV200 - 1.0 rating“Avoid her like the plague”
ENV221 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
39%
Textbook Required
7%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.57 avg changeRatings by Course
JGEENV
5.0
(1)ENV199
4.0
(1)ENV221
3.1
(53)ENV200
2.3
(32)Difficulty by Course
ENV221
3.5
ENV200
3.3
JGEENV
2.0
ENV199
2.0
Reviews (87)
If you want a good GPA do not take her class, she expects you to memorize specific slides and numbers and names rather than the general big picture. Overall, tests do not test your knowledge, they unfairly test your ability to memorize specific facts. Lectures are very interesting but if you want a fair mark stay away from her classes.
The class content is so easy, and yet the tests and marking are unfair. She is a good lecturer and a nice person, however she doesn't write good exams, and the essay marking is very arbitrary. I was actually told that the marking criteria scales were not meant to correlate with any specific grade! This put me off taking another ENV class.
Best lectures: colourful slides and great examples. Good teaching style. Very engaging and clear. Exams: are hard and often do not correlate w/lecture material. Her multiple choice are 4 right nswrs & u must pick the best option vs. three wrong and 1 right answer. Bad tester, great lecturer
Amazing prof!
She is an amazing lecturer but a hard tester. I hate her "all but one" M/C questions and the lecture material does not really match up with tests. Sometimes she can be way too specific with exam questions and expects you to memorize her lecture slides to a t. The assignments and tutorials in this class get you the easiest marks so do them all!
Really passionate Prof. Exams are clear and evaluate core concepts, as opposed to specific details. Would like to take more courses with Professor.
Totally inspiring prof. Very clear. Lecture material reflects readings very clear. Tests are challenging but focus on major lecture material - eg. as opposed to 'nitpicky' details. Really, really wicked prof. Very approachable. Takes many questions after class. Enthusiastic. Funny. Really connects w students. Tutorials great too.
Lectures are useless drivel. Pity this class is required for my degree.
Great prof, very inspiring and clear. She made me even more passionate about a subject I already cared about. Best prof I've had at U of T so far.
Great professor! I really enjoyed this course. The assignments were relevant and connected the concepts to real life. I would recommend this course.
She was very inspirational, spoke clearly and fast, gave very good examples of the message she wanted to get across to the class. She gives a lot of hints on what will be on the midterm and final exam. She is very approachable and friendly.
Her lectures can be fast-paced sometimes, but she explains concepts very clearly to you despite that. The tests are a bit difficult consisdering all the information you have to remember, as it engages in broader topics as well as specific details.
She is a really nice and approachable person. I usually am too scared to talk to any prof but I felt very comfortable asking her for help. Her lectures are pretty clear. The only problem was that the exam was based on all material from all lectures and readings, she didn't get any more specific than that which made it extremely difficult to study.
She is an extremely nice and approachable person, very available to give help and lectures are very straightforward. She posts lecture slides online. Pretty easy course.
very hard midterm and final! Final format: 40mc 8short answers and 2essays!
I like her lectures, however hate her tests. Multiple choice is designed to give a bad mark to students who don't attend class.
The content itself is fine, the prof is a good lecturer and the readings arent difficult, but the grading and tests are horrible. You need to memorize too many specifics rather the broader, important themes of the class. The essay grading was the worst I've ever seen, the feedback made no sense. Shouldn't be this difficult.
She get's a 10/10 at turning a course with easy content to one of the most difficult courses at this school. Avoid her like the plague.
A very good prof, she explains things very clearly however her pace is a bit messy - by the third/fourth lecture the lectures didn't match the course syllabus anymore (like in the syllabus it says that it will be lecture B, but in reality she's still finishing lecture A up and then she'll move on to lecture B without finishing it and it goes on)
The grading in this course was incredibly harsh, and the feedback wasn't helpful in the slightest. The tests were not based on the general knowledge learned in the course, rather memorization of very specific readings. Karen doesn't command the respect of the class, and allows students to talk during her lectures. very distracting. AVOID
She presents her class in the most vague fashion. Powerpoint is used to accompany her bi-weekly monologues but slides skip from on topic to the other, lacking cohesion. Some slides are withheld from students that do not attend lecture. No textbook/relevant readings to help. Her tests are detail specific and don't reflect the content of her slides.
Interesting course, cool material but terrible set up. The tutorials were irrelevant, the lectures were a mess, she moved WAY too fast and tried to fit too much into an hour. Reading expectations were ridiculous, probably close to 50 pages twice a week . Won't post all slidesGreat person, but as a prof expects too much
Expects way too much, treats her students who are unable to attend every lecture like criminals. Asks for specific details from hundreds of pages of readings.
ASK SO MANY DETAILS IN THE TEST
Kind of a bird course but Karen expects you to memorize everything right down to the core. Her tests are very specific and unnecessary. If you have no other way to fulfill breadth then I guess this course is okay. Tutorial and participation marks are really easy though!
Material is easy, but Karen makes the tests extremely nit picky. Multiple choice questions in the finals are extremely poorly worded. Gives you 4 correct answers and makes you pick the one that is the most correct or the one she thinks is the most correct. This makes the tests fairly difficult to do well in. do this for cr/ncr but dont do it for4.0
While some of the material was quite interesting, Karen made it stressful and boring at the same time. Her pace was rushed and messy, so we never had time to copy down slides, which often included different info than the readings. Then she tested us on random info from 45 page gov reports and obscure details from slides. Overall, bad experience.
Honestly, Karen's not an evil being unlike how people portray her here. It's true that her exams are tough but she's a sweet person and more than willing to help students out. An Essay assignment was very meaningful. Course average was C+ which is pretty much similar to other courses.
Loved Karen and her class. Concepts are well explained and lectures are unbiased. Go to class and she will hint on exam concepts that do show up in exams
Unsure about the test yet (not taken yet). But DO NOT take this course for marks if this is to fulfill your breadth requirement. She said the tutorial will be easy 30% but the TA marks you so hard that you are expected to have the same level of critical thinking as a science student. (NOT EASY MARKS AT ALL)
ENV200 is poorly structured pedagogically. Slides posted online are missing little factoids that must be taken from lecture soundbites. Karen is not a great lecturer; quality akin to high-school presentations. Only take this course if you are credit/no crediting the course.
Karen is like my kindergarten teacher but in a bad way. Besides her poor lecturing technique in class, she has so many irrelevant rules that need you to follow just to bring your grade down. She even told TAs to lock the door 10 minutes after the tutorial time so that if you are just a little late then you lose all the marks for that tutorial.
So you think to yourself - I need a Breadth and ENV200 fits my schedule, and looks pretty birdy to boot. Not a bad deal, right? Wrong. Horrendously wrong. Ing seems to be personally slighted that the dept made her teach this joke of a class, and has made it her personal mission to take it out on her poor students. Heed this warning - turn back now.
Takes out a ton of information from the slides, so get ready to write everything during lecture and not listen to her speak. Seriously poor teaching method, Professor Ing. Worst class I've taken in my three years here at UofT. AVOID!
Heavy lectures, and she is a tough grader - but definitely one of the best professors I've had. If you do the readings and listen in lectures, you will do well
Avoid at all costs she seems to like making students lives miserable and I honestly believe she wants you to fail
Shes a really good professor at making an easy course to the most hardcore course ever. Makes you attend class and creates an incomplete version ppt to post online so you have to come to class. First of all htf do you have that much spare time? Has all sorts of rules for her class, but you are taking the course and yourself way too seriously.
Professor Ing explained the course concepts in a clear and concise manner. She was able to make a mandatory course interesting, and I learned a lot throughout the term. She stayed after each lecture for a question period which was helpful. Seemed to really care about all the students in her class.
I took ENV221 for BR. I barely paid attention to any classes and made essentially no notes and still managed to get an A-. The course is not hard but it's also not free 4.0. You don't have to do all the readings, but knowing some of the main points is very important for the final. There are only about 3-4 tutorials and it's 10%, do not miss any!
Ing, although she has a nice Canadian accent, is one of the least caring professors I've ever had. She was a total boomer in organizing online materials and was always too high and mighty to reply to emails. She appears to be a robot with no soul. I thought she seemed nice at first.... disappointed. Does not care at all.
Easy to get an A if you have a good grasp on the course concepts
We have to write 4 750 words essays for the final exam, it was hard.
Yes the class is pretty heavy, but as long as you stay on top of your work it is not too bad. Many expect it to be easy as it is meant to be a breadth requirement for most, but as long as you provide it with the same effort as your other classes, you can definitely finish with a decent grade.
no need to come to lecture she just reads off the slides
Extremely difficult grading for a second year class, so many assignments too, literally had a paper 1 week before the exam. Exam was way too specific, she read off slides the whole time then asked weirdly specific questions in the multiple choice. The lectures are boring and not engaging. First day of class she said she "talks down" to students.
Not a good lecturer - very boring (can make interesting content dull), reads off all the slides, constantly rushing for time, and makes you not want to take ENV courses. While the course content isn't hard to understand, grading and papers are much tougher than the rest of the course and have poor guidelines. Take it in the summer if you can.
An good professor, not the BEST but not as BAD as the reviews make her out to be: Cons: unclear essay rubric, even with high level of feedback from my TA couldn't get higher than 80; a bit dry; tests random stuff. Pros: cares about students, stays behind to answer questions, TA was super nice+approachable (Zeina), posts lec recording, head TA meh
Overall good lectures, and a good professor. Not much to say except the class was good and somewhat useful which is already more useful than most classes. Nothing wrong the professor.
You can tell that Professor Ing really cares about her students and is willing to help out to promote things outside the class. She's also a great lecturer and classes are really engaging/interesting.
This was my second class with her (only bc of requirements) and I always find a lot of her material to be outdated, especially her perspective and material on Malthus and population growth being the main environmental challenge. My TA was pretty unhelpful and a really hard marker. He wouldn't offer me any real feedback even when I would email him
The final exam is not as easy as she mentioned in the lecture, it is very difficult.
I took Professor Ing's ENV221 course in the fall semester and loved it. The material was interesting and her lectures were never dull, as she never reads off slides directly. Her courses are not easy "bird" courses, but she warns in advance of this. Of course, if you attend each lecture and review well before the final exam, you should do ok.
Prof Ing is one of my favorite profs at UofT, her lectures are very interesting and engaging and it is evident that she enjoys her job! She makes an effort to connect with students and is very caring. I could not recommend prof Ing enough!
The course doesn't really teach you anything. All information you learn in this course can be found on Google. Very disengaging class and even more disengaging tutorials. Tutorial assignments are very clearly recycled; i found the first tutorial assignment online in the env200 2010 syllabus. Prof is ok, nothing special about her teaching.
Course was known to be a "bird" course but was not even close. Midterm average is 60%. The assignments aren't connected to lecture content. Also, there were nearly 400 students near the start of the semester but less than 80 students at her lectures by the end of the semester (probably since most dropped out or were bored with her lectures).
She is condescending towards people who do not take science, making statements like 'for those of you rotmans or other students who do not know addition or subtractions', almost as if she is looking down on students. Also, there is no link between the lecture materials and the materials for the tutorials; makes the tutorial overly complicated.
I found the course interesting! The content was somewhat similar to ENV100. The final exam was tough, but doable (it's focused on the readings).
A really great professor who is very passionate about the class and cares about students. Not a bird course but she warns of that at the beginning of the semester. You have to put in work, so go to the lecture, take good notes, do the readings and review before a test. She records/posts lectures but still go to class, it's better!
I had her for both ENV221 and ENV200. She barely explains any of the concepts especially since there's so many topics to cover. She always ran overtime so lecture material kept getting pushed back and back. Lots of papers that she doesn't even explain so you try to guess what she wants. The TAs had different criterias. You couldn't win.
I thought she was fine, but TA's were not. TA grading was really harsh, especially on projects that were not supposed to be hard. This hurt since tutorial assignments were half your grade. The course grading was overly subjective, especially with the essay questions and tut assignments. Should be much more objective and memorization based.
Professor Ing is a great prof. I think she covers a lot of interesting and important information in this course and she communicates it in a way that is very accessible! TA grading was very tough though and so was the midterm - would recommend going to all her lectures for that.
Good prof
To do well in this course you need to READ, READ, READ. Midterm and exam were filled with random facts from them. Lectures were often disorganized and she would need to continue previous material in her next lecture. Cannot stress enough how important the readings are, please do them!!
Great prof one of the best
awful!!!
She maybe my least favourite prof I have had to date. The entire course felt like us versus her. She had a whole speech on how she wants non-science students to leave the course liking science, if anything she has reaffirmed my loathing for science. At every opportunity to make the course harder she made it harder. Not an enjoyable breadth course.
I did zero readings and did very well. If you know the lecture material very well it is easy to get an A. The midterm is difficult if you aren't good at multiple choice with time constraint. I got a 60 on the midterm but a 94 on the exam, so don't be discouraged from the midterm grade. Pay attention to the instructions for assignments.
Ing is severely unorganized, continuously pushing back lectures. She'll also assign 4-5 readings a week, with each averaging 30 pages. According to her, "everything is testable", so you're sure to be tested on the most specific, irrelevant details. I recommend taking this course in the summer with Prof Voght if you can, it was the BEST decision.
I haven't taken environmental courses before so the way Professor Ing explains everything with details and examples, even the fundamental ones, is great. As long as you go to lectures this course isn't difficult or heavy in workload, and readings are very inspiring. Also papers aren't graded by her so the tough grading ratings seem a bit unfair.
I haven't taken environmental courses before so the way Professor Ing explains everything with details and examples, even the fundamental ones, is great. As long as you go to lectures, this course isn't difficult or heavy in workload, and readings are inspirational. Also papers aren't graded by her so the tough grading ratings seem a bit unfair.
the class is quite heavy on the policy side, and very informative of environmental challenges. i loved learning from her, shes very passionate about the environment
Her lectures were not helpful except for her throwing in minuscule details that didn't seem like they mattered, only to come up on the midterm and final. I felt as though a lot of her teaching was trying to weed out students from the program. She was also not very accessible in or outside of class. She's puts minimal care and effort into the class.
She talks a lot, she stays on one slide for 10-15 mins at a time further delaying the course. This is unfortunate for a class cut into 1hour slots. Her exams will cover the tiniest details that she barely touches. Scary.
I had Ing for ENV221 and ENV200. It is easy to tell that she puts no effort into her lectures, yet she is so protective of her slides. She posts her lectures, but they are missing information. Between ENV221 and 200, she copies the exact same slides. She loves exams at exam centres, testing on the most useless details barely discussed in class.
Very bad lectures, not clear, and small keywords barely mentioned at all would be vital in the test. Assignments were very easy and the course had a relatively small workload, but for a breadth class, I think the grading could be kinder and the concepts made much, much more clear.
1. very disorganized lectures.Never give students break.Every new lecture spend more than 70% time on catching up last class as she'll expand on every useless detail and irrelevant personal opinion 2. no clear assignment grading rubric. 3. protect intellectual property really well. Slides are often text heavy, missing key info and lacking pages.
love her! her lectures were super helpful and interesting. lectures aren't recorded, so attendance is mandatory. there was no midterm, so assignments were worth a lot. the final exam was relatively easy, though it was memorization-heavy.
the lecture content is manageable, and the prof is completely fine. Nothing interesting but definitely doable. The main issue with the course, is that the grading is far too harsh for a second year breadth course. The exams are fair, but the tut assignments have what feel like largely arbitrary grades that don't always align with the rubric score.
I took both her env337 and env221 courses. I receive the 2 lowest grades in my entire undergrade life from these 2 courses. 1. no text book only use slides, but test things that are not on the slides 2. did't provide enough opportunity for students to show what they learn.
The lecture slides are incomplete and outdated. During class, she frequently shares numerous personal opinions that lack data or published academic paper to support. The exams include content not covered in lectures, and her grading criteria are extremely strict, making it difficult to achieve a good score.
Unorganized lectures, always missing slides that contain important key take aways. Expanding on unessccary and distracting details during lectures and use outdated sources to support these details. Not friendly to non-native speaker. Recommend taking this course in summer semester which is a different professor.
More of a political activism class than an environment class tbh
TA are terrible. Grades unclear. Feedback is bad.
Makes condescending and strange comments constantly. Assignments are tedious and take 12+ hours while worth a small percent. Refuses to distribute her full slide deck to force students into attendance. Final had the most random and specific questions and was worth 60%. I had an A+ until the final. Do not take her class.
Her classes lowkey is turning me into a conserv*tive
Didn't go to a single lecture and memorized the slides, got a B+. Slides were detailed enough to have enough information and professor was quick to respond to emails. She gets really political but as a Humanities student content was very interesting.
Very kind, funny and knowledgeable. Not sure how her lectures are since 95% of the class is listening to student presentations. Lots of readings, but not necessary to do them since reading notes are posted online. Not to many assignments or tests either. Generally a fair marker, would take her class again as an elective.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
39%
Textbook Required
7%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.57 avg changeRatings by Course
JGEENV
5.0
(1)ENV199
4.0
(1)ENV221
3.1
(53)ENV200
2.3
(32)Difficulty by Course
ENV221
3.5
ENV200
3.3
JGEENV
2.0
ENV199
2.0