3.6
Quality2.5
Difficulty71%
Would Retake114
Reviews71%
Would Retake
114
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
37
4
26
3
26
2
17
1
8
What Students Say
“However, she reads off her powerpoints”
INTD200 - 3.0 rating“So far the sweetest prof I've ever had at McGill”
INTD200 - 5.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
29%
Textbook Required
11%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
-0.17 avg changeRatings by Course
INTD350
5.0
(3)200AND397AND497
5.0
(1)INTD200AND397
4.7
(3)INTD397
4.5
(4)INTD200AND350
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
INTD497
3.0
INTD200AND350
3.0
INTD350
3.0
INTD354
2.7
INTD397
2.5
Reviews (114)
Terrible lecturer and I am being nice. She reads off the slides and is not engaging at all. Her lectures are theory based, and not interesting.
She such a sweetheart! Do the work, you'll get an excellent grade. She doesn't really lecture though and Im glad she doesn't . Loves to talk about your work in office hours after class etc.
Difficult to understand at first due to a serious language barrier, but easy class to do well in. Go to lectures, take notes and do the readings. Midterm was 10 ID questions which we were given in advance, and the paper was very interesting on a topic of your choice. Very sweet and more than happy to prove feedback if you take the time to ask.
The class is super easy as long as you actually put some remote amount of effort into the course. She's amazingly nice if you go to office hours (gave me an extra 8% on the midterm after talking to her). The language isn't an issue so long as you actually try and understand. Plus if you can't understand her, good luck in going into IDS.
Just reads the slides, which are not even clear. The class itself could have been interesting but she made it so bad
YOU READ A LOT! Around 200 pages a week... sometimes lucky and less. The conferences once a week are mandatory and participation reflects your grade... She will almost all the time read the slides instead of explaining the course content.. Gets borring.
Clearly her first time teaching a large class. A pretty standard into class regarding difficulty. A lot of readings, but just do the ones she talks about and you'll be fine. Lectures are a bit boring and slow, yet very easy to follow and clear. Exams are pretty easy but also very trivial. Overall an easier class but not that stimulating.
This class is fairly easy as the tests are basically stuff off the slides. There are lots of readings but it wasnt necessary at all. Barely did the reading and still got an A. Bad lecturer but a really sweet and helpful person. Not very intellectually stimulating but recommended for those who want to boost up gpa.
Kazue is really an amazing professor. She really takes the time to help students especially during her office hours. She is also very helpful with papers and very knowledgable in her field . I would recommend her to anyone who wants to take an INTD class
It was her first year teaching INTD 200 so she was a little shaky at times, but is SO sweet and willing to speak to students. She does not try to make things difficult and she assigns interesting readings!
She's very sweet. However, she reads off her powerpoints. Literally, word for word (and I don't use literally lightly). I went to class about twice. I read a single. I got in a reading group. I learned a lot of stuff by heart. I got an A. Create a facebook group and share the load, guys.
She is one of the sweetest profs ever. Really cares for students, very available for students. Her lectures were not the best because she read off her slides . Weekly conferences are pretty interesting and easy to get full marks. There is one easy paper, one midterm, conference marks, and a final. All of these were all around pretty easy ! Easy A.
Terrible lecturer, can't understand anything she says. Honestly don't know how she became a professor at McGill. Very easy, seems nice, but TERRIBLE lecturer. This class made me want to change my major.
I did not go to class very often and never even bought the textbook but I did pretty well anyways. I'm taking it as a 2nd year though! The topics are easy to understand and all she wants you to know is what's on the slides. You need to memorize stuff for the in-class midterm but the other 2 grades were papers. Paper topics are simple.
Very nice, but difficult to understand (not that I went to class all that often). TAs were much harder markers than Kazue, but she was willing to re-grade all exams/papers.
Horrifically unegaging. Talked mostly about dry, uninteresting case studies that did nothing to introduce to international development. Taught this class with a uni affiliate, he was alright. She seems really smart, but her accent makes understanding her incredibly difficult. She was very kind in regrading all the midterms and giving extra credit.
A nice Japanese lady.
Lovely professor! Works hard to engage all, is very understanding, and has a lot to offer in terms of learning if you choose to put in the work.
Really one of the best profs I've had since coming to McGill. The class is very interesting and there's a potential to learn a lot if you do all the readings (which most students don't due to laziness). Despite other comments, if you want an A, you HAVE to understand the literature well and put in a good amount of work. Highly recommend her class!!
Really one of the best profs I've had since coming to McGill. The class is very interesting and you will learn ALOT if you do all the readings (which most students don't due to laziness). Despite other comments, if you want an A, you HAVE to understand the literature well and put in a good amount of work. Highly recommend her class!!
A very comprehensive course that covers a lot of material! Anyone interested in development should take this course along with econ 313 and 314. Also I think Exams are graded more strictly than in previous years so you have to know your stuff. The average for the midterm was 72%. So yeah I think the class has become tougher now, but great prof!
Interesting class, prior knowledge does help. She posts her slides and never deviates from them in class. The midterm is very easy if you study (she gives you a study guide, just follow it). One oral presentation in conference, participation counts in conferences. Final assignment is actually a paper. Not particularly difficult, often boring class.
A lot of guest lectures, can sometimes be a bit boring in lectures, but still a great choice. Interesting content in the course.
Takamura is probably one of the nicest profs at McGill and really wants her students to do well. Lots of opportunity to boost your grade (easy group presentations, conference participation etc). She brought in lots of guest speakers who spoke about specific development issues, many were very good and interesting! Super easy and interesting class
I LOVE HER! She is thoughtful and goes above and beyond to make sure you feel like you got something out of this course. Talked to her about personal matters related to course material as well - ready to listen. When I missed a conference, she let me make up for it by writing some reading notes on a topic I didn't do well on for the midterm! LOVE.
An easy A. I'd say you'd even only have to prepare well for exams and get an A quite easily, but participating in conference would be hard if you are not up to date on the material. She kinda merely reads the slides, which can be quite boring. However, she is adorable and always willing to help.
After taking both INTD 200 and 397 I'm really impressed. Prof's Kazue's approach to development issues is very unique and I learned a lot! I can't recommend her enough! Go to class and do the readings, and you will be blown with how much more knowledgeable you'll be by the end of the course!
I've had two experiences with Kazue. I took her in my second year for INTD 200 and was not extremely impressed. This past semester, however, I took INTD 397 with her and was BLOWN AWAY. The class was engaging and fun. Kazue excels with a smaller group of students dealing with more specific and interesting topics. Love her and looking forward to 497
Kazue Takamura is an amazing professor because she embodies all the characteristics that a university teacher should have: she's organized, thorough, and her approach to the subjects is very enjoyable for a student, whether you know nothing about it or you're already passionate about it. + she's genuinely heartwarming and loves to help.
Amazing professor. If I were ever to give up IDS she's the reason why I'd choose to stay.
So far the sweetest prof I've ever had at McGill! She is very caring and patient. Her lectures are very well-organized. There are many chances to earn bonus points. The midterm questions are expectable and fair enough. Highly recommend!
Lectures: not super engaging, very comprehensive slides Readings: skimmable/not that important Assignments: diverse, final paper is a little confusing, overall an easy class to do well in if you are willing to put the work in
Absolutely one of the best profs at Mcgill! Such a sweet, caring, loving, and extremely knowledgeable lady! Her lectures are the best I've taken at Mcgill, the material is so interesting and engaging which made me wanna study IDS even more! She's not a tough grader for sure, but you do need to study well. Take her 300/400 level courses and enjoy!
She is a really good teacher. Lectures are clear. Course content are not hard to understand, but an eight page long paper, weighing 45% of total grade, is a little bit heavy for a 200 level course.
she has no clue how to teach a class. this was painful.
Deeply boring, she has no clue of what the actual course is about. She reads off unclear slides and asks you "who wrote this book" in an exam.
Poor lectures, Kazue is really nice but definitely not hilarious. Don't do the readings, they are useless for the midterm. It is easy to get an A, but you will need to attend classes because of the quizzes (easy). But interesting topics and the topic of the final paper is pretty wide so you can talk about whatever you like.
An easy course. You have to study a lot but not way too much. For the midterm you basically knew what was going to be in it, I only studied development theories and almost aced it. However, after the first 3 lectures I stopped going to her class as she only read the slides (which she uploads). Just put the work in and start the final essay asap.
The class is very straightforward in terms of what you need to do to do well. Professor Takamura is very kind and intelligent but her lectures are dry and she usually does not finish them. There are no readings and the material is simple to understand. I did enjoy the guest lecturers from this course.
Kind woman, seems to care about the subject but lectures are very boring as she only reads off of slides.. glazes over important topics and gives a very 'superficial'/surface level analysis of int. development. lecture slides posted on mycourses are incomplete so that people actually go to class (even though I never did but still did well)
Professor Takamura was an absolute angel to have a professor. I have had INTD 200, INTD 350, INTD 397, INTD 497, and INTD 490 with her, so trust me when I say this. To succeed in her classes, be sure to ask lots of clarifying questions, participate thoroughly, and attend her office hours. She is consistently patient, understanding, and caring.
Good class content. The prof is boring and not understandable! Her powerpoints are messy. Attend class cuz quizzes.
She is so sweet and kind. If you find her slides confusing, you can always ask her for help or get a TA to clarify it but she keeps the info succinct and reading the slides will be good enough. However, you do need to attend class for the in-class quizzes but honestly these are super easy mark boosters that really help you. Was a fun course!
The most kind professor.
Lectures are very boring and quiz responses after each lecture got annoying. There is also a group project which is always a potential for disaster but my experience was fine. The midterm was easy and the study guide was exhaustive and was very useful. Would take again because she makes up for the lectures by not making things too difficult.
Easy midterm, easy quizzes, easy project. Lots of well established guest lecturers from the field
Lectures are very boring because she only reads off of slides but it was an easy class overall. Slides are posted after the class but they are a bit confusing.
One of the best professors at McGill. Do not judge Prof. Takamura off of INTD200, which is a large class that spans a variety of topics as dictated by the Department. Take a higher-level class, such as 350 or 497 that really highlights her knowledge of gender issues and migration. She is kind, caring, and I wish more were like her.
Listen; Prof. Takamura is BY FAR the most caring, helpful and polite professor you will likely encounter at McGill. She's always willing to provide additional explanation and grades fairly. Her tests reflect very well the content learned in class. Most importantly, she treats you with so much respect that you simply cannot fail to reciprocate.
Unclear, disorganized lectures. Grading system means you don't have to show up after the midterm. Nice lady and very accessible, but just so hard to focus in lectures. The course material is so broad that it's tough to get much out of it.
Professor Takamura is a wonderful lecturer who takes the time to draw clear links between the real world and theoretical concepts presented. This is a great introduction to a lot of the literature that is referenced in other courses, and in the field in general. She's also extremely caring and understanding of student needs which helps tremendously
Great and caring teacher. She gives numerous opportunities for you to succeed. I appreciated her lectures, her feedback, and her cares for her students. She has clear grading criteria to help you succeed. If you follow her advice and feedback you will pass and succeed.
She is such a sweet professor. I personally had tough time understanding her lectures because they were a bit disorganized, but she would provide extra help if you reach out to her. She was also very considerate when I contacted her about problems with group presentation members. Go to classes, don't fall behind, work hard, then you would do fine.
She is by far one of the nicest profs. Not sure how she performs in in-person classes considering everything is online. She has been very lenient with due dates as well as offering additional support by hosting office hours on Zoom. The class difficulty is definitely manageable. As long as you follow instructions, getting an A is straight-forward
Nice. Didnt do much work. Always get over 80%.
The slides and course materials are disorganized. And the grade response is so slow. The grading criterion for the three essays is not very clear, but you could ask her for suggestions. She is patient to answer your questions. The course itself is not challenging since it is an introductory course.
Very nice teacher but the lectures were disorganized, especially the slides. The course is easy to pass and the course load is manageable. She is super lenient with extra credit and available.
I had Takamura for INTD200 as well and decided to take another class with her. She is probably the most understanding professor at McGill. She is very sweet and caring. The course itself was interesting and easy to success as well. 10/10.
Prof. Kazue cares about her students, she was VERY flexible during remote learning (she offered up to 6-7 bonus points in total). Her lectures aren't very well structured and they tend to get confusing because she jumps back and forth but if you manage to do the readings and follow the main points you'll be good. Assignments were lacking feedback.
Professor Takamura has to be one of the most understanding professors at McGill. Her lectures are easy to understand and she's always down to provide clarification if a student needs it. Her assignments are also VERY fair, you just have to do the bare minimum (show up to lectures, take notes, and at least skim the readings) to get an A.
By far one of the nicest profs I've had. She repeatedly makes herself available to address concerns or questions before papers are due and is super patient when approached. The content of her lectures and the debates she highlights around issues of sustainable development are also very engaging.
She's super passionate about what she's teaching and you can tell. In guest lectures, she makes her own notes and always asks the guests questions and engages with them. Speak up in her class - she wants students to be involved! Pretty reasonable course load. Instructions/information sometimes confusing but she's always available to clarify.
She is very reasonable and understanding to students. The online class was graded with three essay assignments, small quizzes, and conference reflections (alternative assignment available). Her lectures are more freeform than structured but the class was not tested on memorization so there's no pressure to have extremely organized notes anyways.
Very nice.
I love kazue so much. I had her for INTD200 which was also a good experience. I feel like everything is super clear -all the concepts - and I learn a lot as long as I go to the lectures and attend the conferences and do the quizzes. Readings not necessary which is nice because there are a lot of them. She is a fair grader, and isnt a hard class.
Super sweet and really passionate about the subject, has really in depth adjacent knowledge too and has extra reading recs if you're interested and reach out
The class wasn't super difficult, but it was hard to follow the lectures sometimes.
The lectures were simple and comprehensive! The grading scheme is very well distributed so even if you get a bad grade you're ensured to save your overall grade. The weekly quizzes and conferences help ensure students that they stay updated and on board with the content! If you want an easy but interesting class take this for sure !!!
This class was a lot of reading material (around 3-4 long readings a week), but they were very interesting and could be done on your own time. All of the lectures were recorded and easy to follow so it wasn't difficult to complete them. Prof is very nice and understanding, she held lots of review sessions and was always available to meet.
Weekly quizzes and conference reflections (easily done without watching the lectures). None of the readings were useful, lectures extremely disorganized and confusing. Teacher was hard to understand but shes a really easy grader. Easy A but very boring (interesting boring, just badly presented). Midterm - final paper, no exams over the year.
I love Kazue and have had two classes with her. Her lectures aren't the most interesting and honestly, can be hard to follow, but if you listen to what she's saying it's easier than trying to follow the lecture slides. Class is easy to do well in and Kazue is very helpful if you have questions. She's honestly the most kind-hearted prof ever.
Take this class if you are interested in international development. Be prepared, not a great lecturer. Didn't love the class at first, but really warmed up to her and the content is interesting. You only need to do the readings needed for the 2 essays. Loved the way she organized the grades - small regular assignments kept me engaged all semester.
She's clearly passionate abt INTD, but is a bad lecturer; she's just disorganized and is really hard to follow. For essays, she doesn't give written prompts/guidelines and is really unclear, so when I was writing my papers I had only a vague idea of what I was supposed to be writing about.
Took my first International Development class with Professor Takamura and I loved it, found it to be a great intro course as an IDS major. She is extremely sweet and answered emails quickly, providing feedback and guidance when necessary. Lectures were a bit disorganized but the material was still interesting and understandable.
Takamura is a really lovely person but brutal lecturer. Feedback on assignments came very late, guidelines were unspecific, and her classes were poorly organized. She was very accessible and happy to help and clearly is very intelligent and passionate about intd, but her classes are hard to engage with and make really interesting content feel dull
The content of the class is interesting, but she is often a bit difficult to follow. There were certain topics that multiple students found confusing and she didn't clarify well. The assignments are useful in terms of learning the material, there's just a lot of them. She's very sweet, but the class was a bit confusing sometimes.
The course was very interesting though - a good introductory course. Even though Takamura is passionate about the topics she teaches, she is very confusing during her lectures - unorganized. She gives vague, unclear instructions so contact your TA. Many assignments per week but my advice is to finish them and get rid of them as fast as you can.
Takamura is a very sweet person, however I found her lectures extremely disorganized and all over the map. I found she would say really big words or phrases and not explain them at all, when this was an introductory course. However she is a really easy grader despite making you write like 13 500 word papers on top of the regular papers.
Honestly a good professor in the sense that she allows extensions (even if you dont have a justifiable reason). But her lectures are extremely tiring to sit through, and its tough to understand the point shes making which makes it harder to take good notes. Shes a sweet person but I would not be able to sit through another one of her lectures.
Prof Takamura isn't the best lecturer and her lectures can get pretty boring. If you attend the conferences and do the readings then you'll have everything you need for the quizzes and assignments. The class also had weekly quizzes and responses which were great to ensure students kept up with the material.
Prof Takamura is a lovely person and super understanding. However, I do agree that her lectures can be a bit disorganized. I will be forever grateful for her kindness when she still accepted my final essay which was handed in very very late due to burnout.
I believe her rating is too low. The topics she chose for INTD 200 were extremely interesting and provided insightful readings. Her lack of strength in lecturing is balanced by her bringing in guest speakers and responding to emails quickly. TAs were easy graders. I can't say enough good things about that class. It solidifies my intent to do INTD.
Although she is a boring lecturer, you can tell she cares so much about the subject. I really liked the way this class was structured and how the final is pretty customizable. The conferences were very helpful and she's kind, especially with extensions. The readings are interesting and the quizzes are an easy 100% to boost your grade!
Loved Professor Takamura! Her topics were very interesting, she has a passion for her work and is extremely intelligent. You can feel the effort she puts into the material and the choice in guest lecturers. Only negatives: lots of quizzes and conferences, but they don't count for much. Found grading to also be vague, but revisions are possible!
The kindest, nicest professor you will find at McGill. She is not a harsh grader and is very reachable outside of class. She treats you like a person and cares about your mental and physical health. She gives extensions if you sincerely ask for them. doesn't record lectures, and grading is vague, but she is extremely knowledgeable.
INTD 200 is a great course and I would 10/10 recommend it. The content was always very interesting and worth going to lectures. Prof Takamura is a great professor and her class in terms of graded work was fairly easy. However, she is a dry lecturer and I found it difficult to pay attention the whole time
Professor Takamura is an engaging, knowledgeable and caring teacher who values class participation a lot. She is totally not condescending like other profs can be, so don't be afraid to pitch in and participate! You'll get great results in the end.
Amazing prof! Her lectures are clear to follow and well done. 10 quizzes, 5 conference reflections, one midterm paper, and one final paper. She is sometimes hard to understand, however, I found it becoming easier throughout the course. I definitely recommend taking her courses.
Prof. Takamura has great lectures with interesting content and a lot of guest speakers which makes it really insightful. However, there are a lot of assignments to do that are not worth for a lot in your grade. There are also a lot of readings each week. Overall, would recommend taking this class for the variety of topics that it covers!
Prof. Takamura is passionate and extremely kind, this class was very interesting and the grading was based on written quizzes, conferences and papers.
This class was very fair and great to learn the ropes of university as a first year student, gives plenty of experience tackling writing assignments in Arts. Prof is sweet, however, the content itself had so much unmet potential, as it felt really surface level and her lectures jumped around subjects a lot. I wish her lectures had more depth.
The course content was very interesting, covering a wide range of developmental issues across the world. Prof is very intelligent and has a wealth of knowledge with respect to INTD. However, a lot of the lectures were based on the slides which I felt were very brief. it'd be difficult to get above a b- without doing the readings.
Overall, Takamura was a solid prof. The class moves fast and covers a wide range of topics and lectures don't go in depth, but you are not expected to know anything not covered in lectures and readings. Grading was fair; The quizzes were just graded on completion, and be sure to rely heavily on readings for the papers.
To be honest the class was pretty easy and I would recommend it to any first year. The only issue with the course is Kazue Takamura. She speaks so quickly, talks about things that have no correlation with the slides and just makes no sense. I tried to go to the lectures at the start of the year but gave up because it was completely pointless.
She is a very smart prof but she just reads off the slides. Her lectures are absolutely useless and she is not a good communicator. Very monotone and lectures are boring. That said, she is smart and very knowledgable so asking her questions really helps.
Prof Takamura is evidently very knowledgeable about the topics she is teaching and is also very kind/sweet. However, lectures were often unorganized and very interesting content, which could have been incredibly engaging, was not used for its full potential. As a caveat though, she often brought in very insightful guest lecturers. Easy overall.
she's great and very knowledgeable but hard to understand at times. this makes her lectures kinda tedious/repetitive and consequently optional (although not recorded, a lot of ppl skip). she brings in amazing guest speakers tho!!! sooo many assignments it's insane (i.e 8 quizzes worth 5% in total), but it's not hard to do well if you put in time!
it is extremely hard to focus on her lectures, she is constantly correcting herself like she have no idea what she is talking about.
Lectures are useless, never returned final paper grade even after emailing twice, a whole half year later.
The content of the course and the guest lectures were very interesting but the lectures can be boring
Prof Takamura is very passionate about this course although it can be hard to follow the lectures without doing readings. She uses the same course structure for most of her classes and her mycourses is easy to follow. The content covers various topics and is quite interesting! The quizzes and conferences help reinforce the content, overall great!
While Professor Takamura is clearly a nice and well-meaning person, her lectures are difficult to follow due to limited proficiency in English, and the format of the slides is confusing. She has clearly been teaching this course for many years, yet still manages to make it hard to follow. The material is easy, but it's not taught well.
This prof is very kind HOWEVER she is ABSOLUTELY NOT organized at all and it is IMPOSSIBLE to follow her course. Not clear at all, her slideshow are THE MOST disorganized thing I've seen in a while and its impossible to take notes. She is also very complicated to understand and this makes the course even more difficult.
As much as I'm sure she is a good person, her lectures were HORRIBLE. They were not clear at all, with 65 disorganized slides crammed into one hour, making it impossible to follow or take notes. Would not recommend.
Her lectures are not very engaging, but the guest speakings are super interesting and the conferences/quizzes are not marked harshly. Essays are fairly marked.
Prof. Takamura is very sweet, and the subjects she teaches are very interesting, but her lectures are very boring and hard to follow due to her lack of English proficiency and disorganized slides. However, she brings in tons of great guest speakers, but otherwise, you can learn just as much from the readings.
Prof Takamura's lectures are difficult to follow as she does not speak English very well. She goes back and forth on the lecture slides, which makes it hard to follow. Conferences help a lot.
She is very sweet but her slides are insanely difficult to follow - you can't rely on the slides alone. Every week a 300 word "quiz" is assigned which was just to prove you attended that week's lecture. Lectures were mostly a recap of the readings. TAs intentionally capped the number of As and A minuses given on midterm and final papers.
Is very sweet but does not speak English well and is very very difficult to follow. I would suggest sitting in the front. She tends to focus on human rights alot which may not be everyones thing
Kazue is wildly disorganized with her material, her slides are pointless and she does an extremely poor job at explaining. Her midterm was extremely unfair and based 100% on memorization of extremely long and tedious readings, with no understanding or thinking involved, just retranscribing quotes from authors from decades ago. Avoid
Such a sweet prof, interesting lectures. She is highly interested in the subject she teaches and cares about students. Readings are long, dense, and often full of jargon. Midterm was difficult but fair (mostly because of time constraints), and TA Lauren Avis is super nice. Highly recommend taking, especially for first-years considering INTD.
The instructor is kind, but lectures were very disorganized, impossible to follow, and lacked structure. Much of the class time was devoted to student presentations instead of professor-led teaching, which significantly reduced the quality of instruction. The course did not provide the level of guidance or learning expected from a university class.
nice prof but very disorganized and incoherent. took her for intd 200 and it used to be much better with just essays, there's no use for exams in intd classes imo. weekly conferences and quizzes are also useless but easy marks i guess. this class is literally just theory and buzzwords. she brings in great guest lecturers though
Professor Takamura was an amazing professor. While her lectures aren't mandatory they are helpful in understanding the material. She clearly loves the subject, and is very accommodating, she wants you to do well if it's clear you're putting in the work. Guest lecturers were also amazing, and tas are very helpful.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
29%
Textbook Required
11%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
-0.17 avg changeRatings by Course
INTD350
5.0
(3)200AND397AND497
5.0
(1)INTD200AND397
4.7
(3)INTD397
4.5
(4)INTD200AND350
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
INTD497
3.0
INTD200AND350
3.0
INTD350
3.0
INTD354
2.7
INTD397
2.5