2.9
Quality3.8
Difficulty48%
Would Retake146
Reviews48%
Would Retake
146
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
24
4
37
3
28
2
27
1
30
What Students Say
“Unfortunately, Koide is not one of those people”
OCHEM2 - 2.0 rating“Quite possibly the worst teacher I've encountered yet, simply because he did not care”
CHEM0320 - 2.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
22%
Textbook Required
44%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.33 avg changeRatings by Course
OCHEM1
5.0
(2)OCHEM310
5.0
(1)OCHEM0320
4.0
(1)CHEM0340
4.0
(1)CHEM1810
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
SCIENCE
5.0
CHEM330
4.4
OCHEM2
4.2
CHEM0310
4.1
CHEM2310
4.0
Reviews (146)
Very hard, exams are brutal and prof is hard to understand. Avoid!!
Very difficult to understand and class is hard to sit through
Very hard exams, cant understand at all, class is hard to stay awake for
horrible professor. do not take this class.
No Comments
don't take him
AVOID AT ALL COSTS
Kaz is a brilliant man and an excellent teacher, but if you have trouble with accents avoid. His english is correct, but he has an accent. His handouts are easy to follow along, and the tests are straight from the handouts. No book needed.
I'm taking him now and we just got our first test back, the class average was a 50 if that tells you anything. He's tough man, but OChem's a tough course anyways so it's to be expected.
He has his grading curve set and then gives tests where is average is WAY below his set C point and refuses to alter his curve. I felt like I understood and knew the material on the last exam and ended up with a 23. No partial credit on exam. Awful.
obviously at pitt to do research. teaching seems like it is a chore for him to do. class is incredibly monotonous - might as well just copy all the rxns from the text since all the class consists of is him drawing mechanisms on the board. can't teach.
He expects you to work, so when students do badly in Ochem they blame it on him. He's hilarious if you have a dry/quirky sense of humor. He's also helpful, and if people do badly on tests, he gives extra credit points at recitation. Great researcher
You'll regret it. I understand the amount of work required for this course. I spent countless hours reading and studying the endless complicated reactions, but his lectures provided me with migraines instead of conceptual understanding.
His exams test you on nothing from the book whatsoever; they're all on his super-complicated reactions. You could memorize the book inside and out and you'd still fail.
Had him for a grad class. By far the worst teaching the chem department. Hard to understand and he tests on concepts that fall WAY out of the scope of his lecture. Got a B in his class, but myself and other grad students just quit going to his lectures and spent the morning studying the material as a group rather than in his suck class. AVOID.
Pretty easy, as far as ochem goes...just print out the lecture notes and follow along. Go to recitation to get the answers to his old tests and study the tests then you'll be fine. Haven't even opened the book yet and got a B on the first test. He does have a sense of humor and tries to make analogies so u understand.
Loved him! does have a strong accent, but very approachable after class. Neat handwriting and the tests are very straight forward if you study the rec handouts, and hardly ever refered to book (only for extra problems). Honestly, first exam, our class average was 78, everyone elses was 58.
He's a really nice guy, He always smiles. His examples are clear and he stops a lot to answer questions. The notes outline the book pretty much. If you understqand the notes and understand how to do problems on the recitation handouts then the exams will be easy. The only bad thing is that the whole grade depends on 3 exams and the final.
He stresses understanding over memorization, so that'll be helpful in future chem courses. His lectures are well organized and he really wants to make sure you understand things. Pay attention to recitation problems, they're just like test problems. He's a very nice guy and makes ochem as easy to understnad as it can be
Very friendly guy, makes good use of examples to clarify everything. Test questions are the recitation questions. Stresses understanding over memorization. He does have a thick accent, but you get used to it quickly. Makes class as enjoyable as you can make an ochem class.
Not too bad for an o chem class, test questions like recitation problems, notes clear. Approachable and friendly. Recitations are helpful.
Great teacher. Has really improved since he last taught. Printed notes are excellent and easy to follow. Tests are fair and not difficult if you study. Easy to talk to and funny/dry sense of humor. Probably one of the best O. Chem profs. from what I have gathered. Has a mild accent, but not difficult to understand.
Gives out lecture notes which make the class much easier. Class is fast sometimes but recitation is very helpful. If you work hard you can do well. Koide also has his moments where he is hilarious. :) I would recommend him for ochem.
He is thinks everything revolves around organic chemistry, and he isn't very clear in explaining the reactions or mechanisms. He bascially uses his lecture to copy his notes on the board which is useless becuase he doesn't explain anything.
The Kazmanian Devil. He is clear in his notes on what he wants you to know. Tests are not hard, do not listen to the various vag's that think that they are. Kaz is not real helpful in the office but is in class. He also likes football and was the winner of the annual national hotdog eating contest this year in NY.
The class was easier than I expected it to be which was good. However, he never really had a concrete grading scale which sucks because you have no idea how you are doing in the class. He was not very approachable outside of class because he claimed that he "didn't have time" to answer any of my questions. However, there are worse profs.
His lecture notes would be great asset to any ochem student. He is very clear and his tests are fair. Ochem will be a lot of work no matter what, but he gives you a very logical outline in class that correlates nicely with the book. He's kinda funny too.
Amazing teacher. His notes are clear and all online. He tries very hard and he always smiles. The quizes at recitation were very helpful. Most of the exam questions were very similar to those on the quizes. He posted the answers to eht quizes online too, so recitation wasn't something you had to go to unless you didn't understand how to do somethin
An excellent professor in my opinion. Explained things very clearly in the most simple terms. He's a cheerful guy who promotes student participation and always waits around afterward to answer questions. His class was not tremendously difficult either (no HW). A little awkward in private office hours but who goes to those anyway?
He gives very good notes and has a sense of humor. Not the clearest speaker, but if you pay attention you should do pretty well. Tests were pretty difficult, average was about 65/100 on the midterms and 96/200 on the final.
Dr. Koide gives very good notes, and can be very funny at times. He does have an accent, but you will get used to it very quickly. Make sure you study the recitation handouts because they will help out a lot on the tests. The 3 midterms were pretty difficult but fair, although the final is rediculous and the average is around 50%.
He's not very in depth about the material but he's very clear about what is expected on exams. lectures are organized and he gives great partial notes. study the recitation problem sets as they are previous test questions. I was successful by doing all the text book problems in addition to his problem sets. overall pretty fair.
Avoid this man like the black plague. Test averages are lower than any of the other teachers. I feel as if I got nothing out of this class. Have yet to take the final, but I based on the averages from previous years, it is not going to be fun. You will work your butt off without being rewarded.
He taught the material clearly enough, but the grading is harsh. I felt like I learned a lot, but got very little grade-wise to show for it. Most of my problems with O-Chem have to do more with how the curriculum is step up rather than the teaching methods, but there's probably a better teacher out there than Koide.
Koide is the worst professor I have had yet at Pitt. He will straight up tell students that he does not have time for them. Additionally, the grading on the exams seems to depend largely on the TA that grades it. The same answers don't necessarily receive the same amount of points and he is very strict about giving points back.
Koide was the worst science prof i've had. his notes are great, but his exams were rediculous. he was unkind to students and his TAs were horrible at grading his exams, which fluctuated from a normal difficulty level to really really really how-the-heck-am-i-supposed-to-apply-anything-i-learned-to-this level. i agree, avoid like the plague.
Koide is the man. I dont know if things changed this year from the past but his tests are fairly easy. You can decide not to take one of the 3 midterms, and the other two (plus the final) will count for slightly more. His tests are usually straight from the notes, so attendance is mandatory. Very approachable, and his accent isnt THAT bad haha
Not the easiest teacher to understand, but the tests were very straightforward and not hard if you study your notes. By far the easiest teacher for ochem 2.
Probably the easiest OChem teacher. that being said, you will still have to work hard. has straight forward tests. If you are really interested in learning, take Bandik. If you are interested in passing, take Koide. He is a fine teacher, but not always completely clear.
Koide is good for a chuckle every occasionally,which breaks the monotony.He really stresses mechanisms.Even if not asked for,providing mechanism yields extra points,and boosted my grade.Midterms were not too bad but final was ludicrous,but I still did well overall. Pay attention to the the rec handouts,for they're former test problems.Recommended
Good teacher. His exams are alright. He has a good sense of humour, but keep in mind you'll most likely be taking him for Organic Chemistry-- any teacher that will actually teach you and hold you to standards in Organic Chemistry will naturally be a hard teacher.
I did not go to one of koides classes; he gives out notes and literally the problems on the test are identical to the ones on his handouts. I got an A-. If you do the book problems, and read his notes you will get a good grade. If you blame his accent then you are just looking for an excuse.
Don't let the accent scare you, you quickly get used to it. His notes are excellent and he gives you old test problems which are exactly the same as the exams. He sets you up to do well on the test. That said, its Ochem, so its hard, but he curves generously and really tries to make real-world connections we care about.
Dr. Koide is a very average teacher. His notes are so good that you don't even need to go to class, and his tests contain problems from his problem sets (curves are super generous). No need to look at the book just concentrate on reading his notes and you'll do well. Best Ochem 2 professor, ochem 2 is naturally a hard class, stop complaining.
I think he is a good professor if you try and give him the benefit of the doubt. He has a cute sense of humor and is helpful if you go to him. His notes are awesome! And his problem sets are helpful. The class was divided two ways people either got it or they didn't. Test averages were not 30% as someone previously stated.
Explains things well in class. Attendance is not mandatory, but definitely worth it. Exams are hard, but curves are generous.
He best chem professor I've had at this school. His notes are excellent and his problem sets are very useful. The tests aren't impossible if you understand the problem sets. He wants to see his students succeed. His jokes are amusing too.
The worst teacher I have ever met. Not enough clarity.
Great professor. Really easy as long as you do the practice problems and understand the theory behind them.
This guy is awesome. Makes funny comments during lecture which lightens up the mood a little. Note packets are crystal clear and the example problems he gives are excellent test preparation. As long as you put in the work on the tests a decent grade is very achievable.
Lectures were pointless. All he does is go through his notes, which are admittedly very good, but no teaching occurs; you have to teach yourself. TA's sometimes lectured, but were even worse. Tests were difficult, but that's to be expected with Ochem. Has an accent, but its not terribly hard to understand him. Funny guy, but not recommended.
His notes are so indepth and great, and are way clearer than the book. I know people who complain about not getting something and then blame him but dude some peple just aren't going to get the material. It's O-Chem, everyone sturggles. His accent isnt bad at all despite what ppl here say. Unless youe never been around an asian before, its not bad.
Easiest OCHEM 2 teacher. Attendance is not mandatory. Test questions are straight out of his notes/practice problems. If you have a decent organic 1 background, this class will be a breeze.
Very straightforward in his note packets and the way he presents the material. His course and his tests are very mechanism based. As long as you do the practice problems and understand them well, you will do great on his tests.
I would recommend Koide for Ochem. He is a good teacher and a fair grader. Tests are based on his class notes and practice problem sets(which are well organized and help clarify material). Test questions often came directly from these sources, no surprises. He goes through his class notes slowly and encourages questions.
Gives great notes, but must teach yourself everything in this course. Seems like a nice guy in lecture, however he was rather rude to me the few times I approached him on his own. Possible he was having bad days, but I was very put off. Wouldn't recommend. There are much better alternatives.
It seems like Koide isn't particularly interested in teaching. Not the worst professor out there, but I felt like I didn't learn the chemistry so much as memorize mechanisms for the exams. If he doesn't use Courseweb again, try to get the PDF version of the notes from someone who took him before, he basically reads right off of them in lecture.
Quite possibly the worst teacher I've encountered yet, simply because he did not care. Came into lecture the first day and announced that he did not want to be there, he was only teaching the course because he was forced to. Stingy partial credit. Lectures are useless if you have his notes. He put little or no effort into the course whatsoever.
Dr. Koide just doesn't seem to be interested in teaching ochem2 or helping students through it. The averages on the exams were all really low (in the 50-60% range). I don't get what the point of taking an exam that is a mind game. The final sucked, too.
Ochem is hard no matter who you take it with, but certain teachers can make it fun and interesting. Unfortunately, Koide is not one of those people. He was very unapproachable. made us to talk to his secretary for alot of things. also very thick accent. I don't care that he's foreign, but ochem is hard enough without being able to understand him.
Koide might have been an ok professor in the past, but it seems like he really dropped the ball this semester. No course web, unclear notes and lectures, grad ta left for 2 months so there were limited recitations by undergrads. He gives very little partial credit and his exams are tough, especially considering that I taught myself everything.
Hard to understand on the day 1, but quickly got used to it. Study from the handouts and the practice problems because they really reflect the exams and there won't be any surprises. If you can visualize things in your head, OChem is one of the easiest classes there is, if you cant its one of the hardest. Thats true no matter the prof you have
Writes very clear on the board. He's obviously rushed. Blackboard sucks so he has a Facebook group and actively posts. Took a few classes to get the accent. Tests are messier than the practice material but lecture notes were amazing. Avgs on tests were 70,70, 50. Curves avg to 80. I expect to be annihilated on the final tomorrow. Very likeable.
Learn his recitation handouts inside and out. At least half of his tests are based on the recitation handouts. His accent is difficult at first but you get used to it. Be prepared to teach yourself, and you will succeed.
Kaz is pretty good. Very level headed and will help you. He's going to ruin your life over the next 4 months but you win some and lose some. AMAZING lecture notes. He hates the book, which is good.
Koide is a pretty good professor. His notes are very clear and he's good at putting things on the board. His recitation worksheets are tremendously helpful since the exams are pretty similar to them. It's Ochem so of course you have to put in work to get a good grade. His accent is not bad at all and his jokes are actually pretty funny.
Koide is very knowledgeable with ochem and he is very busy with it. His notes are really in detail, he doesn't use the book (besides extra practice for yourself) and his recitation worksheets are old test questions, so you go into tests knowing how questions will be asked. His accent is fine but there are times where you just can't understand him
Koide is not as bad as these reviews say. I was very nervous for the class based on this but it turned out to be great. I studied a decent amount but not to a point where I was up all night. His tests are basically the recitation sheets so if you do and understand those, you will pass. Accent is not bad and tells some good stories during lecture
OChem is a hard class no matter what professor you have. That being said I did not like the layout of Koide's class. He had pre typed notes that he went over on the projector for lecture. With this style of less handwritten and visual examples it made learning difficult for me. Exams are the only points, the final being worth 50% of your grade.
Loved it
Decent guy, but can't teach for the life of him. Organic chemistry is hard enough as it is, it's even harder when the professor can't explain things. Avoid if you can. If you have to take him, you'll be okay. Just be prepared to teach yourself.
He gives higher average curve than other professors. However, he thinks that the average of standard deviation of different tests makes the final standard deviation, which is statistically invalid. As a result, the standard deviation appears much larger than the truth, which poll every one to the middle, B-. Avoid if you expect an A.
DO NOT TAKE HIM. Horrible professor. He's not good at explaining things and can be rude when answering a question. If possible take someone else. This course is hard enough, if possible take someone else who actually wants to teach.
Coming in as a student who averaged B/B+ in gen chem, I can certainly say that Koide is an excellent professor. If you like amazing organization, transparency, and a decent bit of humor, Koide if your man. His recitations sheets and practice exams mimic what you can expect to get. I really wish I could have taken him for OChem2!
The only grades you get are three exams and the final. if you fail the first, its almost impossible to get yourself back up to a passing grade. its not that he's a bad professor, its that he can be hard to understand, and he claims that if you do the recitation worksheets, you can pass the exams which just is not true.
As difficult as you would expect an organic chemistry class to be. Tests are extremely fair and sometimes even include exact problems from the chapter problem sets he provides. Study those and practice exams and you'll be fine. He's a really funny guy and gives A LOT of resources to use for studying.
Koide was honestly a great teacher. The accent is pretty easy to get used to & he grades really fairly. You can tell he wants everyone to do well & he gives recitation homework sets that are extremely similar to the types of test questions. Only real downside is that your grade is based solely on test scores, so you have to really know your stuff.
Kaz was an amazing professor. He puts so much effort into his lectures, and genuinely wants everyone to do well. Anyone who says his accent is tough isn't sitting close enough to the front. If you do the recitation sheets, read the book,you will do well. extremely accessible and organized. Made me want to be a chem major.
Do the practice problems a few times before the exams and getting a good grade isn't hard. I barely passed gen chem and did really well in this class. He doesn't make any trick questions and the notes are extremely thorough. Getting outside explanations from TAs/tutors will help a lot because a lot of the material isn't taught too in depth.
Koide is a fine choice for O Chem. He really does care about improving as a professor and is working on making changes to the course based on our feedback. His accent is nothing to worry about. O Chem is hard no matter which professor you take. Do all of his practice problems and practice exams before taking the actual exam. He has a nice curve.
Fantastic o chem professor. Highly recommend. He is not the best lecturer ever, but they are good enough and he tells you exactly what will be on the test!!!! If you couldn't manage to pass you must've refused to try. Gives practice problem packets and that's exactly what's on the test.
Koide really wants his students to succeed. He provides a lot of practice problems from old exams. However, exams are the only thing graded. There is a curve and he is awesome about answering questions posted on the facebook page.
Koide is a good professor and is very straight forward. You're graded on three exams and a final which aren't impossible but you definitely need to know the material. Notes are straight from the book. Recitation packets are wonderful and comprised of past exam questions.
Gives recitation worksheets with problems from past exams and also suggests book problems to do so if you study the book problems and recitations sheets along with the last years exams which he provides the exams are predictable and even though there is a lot of material I found it clear what I needed to know
He's alright, I guess. Class can get confusing at points and it can be really hard to follow along with where he is; even though he has pre-planned notes he seems to jump around a lot on them. My grades started improving when I skipped class to read the book and teach myself. I'd definitely try to take a different instructor if possible.
There's too much content to learn in Ochem for any professor to teach it all in class. Koide is very organized and posts lecture/textbook outlines so even though you can't learn it all in lecture, you know exactly what you need to teach yourself. In ochem 2 now(with a different prof) and missing Koide's structure and organization. Would recommend.
Dr. Koide is a great choice for anyone taking ochem at Pitt. He is clear, organized, and gives you all of the exam problems at some point or another on recitation packets or practice exams. Literally all you need to do to get an A is learn the packets and practice exams and you're good. Also he's a generally great guy and very approachable.
ONLY take Koide if you know FOR SURE that you are a very independently motivated learner. Grade is 100% based on exams. His style (thorough notes, but almost verbatim from the book) is not my jam. Lecture-sized, grad student-led recitation was useless. Final exam is 42% of your grade, and was much harder than other exams and practice problems.
The first 2 tests were fine. After that Koide kept talking about how averages were too high and even when they hit the 60's he didn't think they were low enough. The final exam is 42% of the grade and even though the average was a 50, he said it was still high. The curve was non-existent or minuscule. Get ready to teach yourself since he can't.
You entire grade is tests. 3 midterms and a final with the final worth 42% of your grade. No curve or any way to save your grade if you don't do well on an exam. Only take if you're willing to spend hours a day teaching yourself.
Extremely organized professor. Lecture notes are clear, and indicate pretty clearly what will be on each exam. The final was hard, but that should be expected. He DOES curve the course, but the class averages on exams were higher than expected, which minimized the curve. Solid choice overall.
Koide is a solid choice for Ochem. 3 exams worth 18%, 19%, 21%, and a final worth 42%. First three exams were extremely predictable, but the final was a beast (due to high averages). However, the curve was pretty big. Average was around a 55 on the final, and that was in the B range. Not the best at lecturing, but tells you exactly what to know.
Great, well structured (this is rare), printable notes that basically give you everything that is going to be tested on; I got an A- just by studying those notes and going to TA hours. It's a shame that so many people complain b/c it's hard - it's Ochem, it'll be hard no matter who you take. Koide does his part to present everything you'll need.
Koide is good if you're willing/able to dedicate a lot of time outside of class to self teach material. He's not the most approachable or friendly person. Yes, exams are very similar to previous exams but I feel like most people just memorized those answers and didn't fully understand concepts, which will come back and hurt you in ochem 2.
get prepared to teach yourself everything. Exam averages were weirdly high for an ochem class and this concerned him so he curved DOWN at the end.
I liked Dr. K as an Orgo prof, but for UG research.. Dr K will answer any questions and gives solid feedback; the problem is with the grad students. They act like you're in their way, won't answer questions or get off their butts to show you where something is, etc. Dr. K's answer is to just keep pestering them until they answer, like that works :(
His exams are fair and he does provide problem sets that are helpful. However, you really do end up teaching yourself. Undergrad UTAs are very helpful. However, he is so condescending when answering questions in class and On teams students refuse to ask him questions. He makes students feel stupid and I just am not for that. He is just plain rude.
The only good thing I can say about Koide is that he gives decent notes and practice problems for each chapter. Other than that, his exams are extremely hard and the only way you'll pass is by memorizing 30+ mechanisms for each exam. He is EXTREMELY condescending and disrespectful towards his students, and gives no partial credit. Take anyone else.
Prof Koide goes above and beyond to make sure he teaches the most difficult o chem 2 class possible. Makes you memorize 20 amino acids during the last week of class and expects you to know everything about them for the final. Would definitely avoid at all costs. His exams are extremely difficult and he gives no partial credit
Dr. Koide takes points off for regrades, his tests are impossible if you dont spend hours on them each day, his final is a monster and makes you feel like you know nothing about things that you could do in the reviews. He is mean, hard to reach, and will find a way to make you feel bad about asking for help. A choice i completely regret.
Grade is exams, DIFFICULT to engage in class, likely to teach yourself Doable if you've time to memorize EVERYTHING, except exam 3, which was not "like recitation packets", not a fan of his curve system or regrade policy just so much to know and he didn't make it easier with 20 aa structures which is uncommon for ochem and the last week of class
A professor with very unclear expectations and rules. Sure, his tests are curved "tentatively" (ok, a lot of chem profs do that), but his regrade policy always changed. To the point where it led to a regrade request being a risk of losing 3 points if no grading problems were to be found. Also, after exam 2, there was little to no partial credit.
Your grade depends on 3 midterms (20%) and 1 final (40%) and they're the hardest exams I've ever had. They're "based on recitation packets," but not really. He changes his grading policy throughout the semester, is incredibly rude and condescending to his students, and clearly does not want to be a teacher. Don't take him if you can avoid it.
Dont read reviews that are posted during the semester. Despite lectures notes being posted online, the majority of people that got an A on the exams attended lecture. Prioritize understanding mechanisms. Def the hardest course i've taken but it pushed me to be a better student overall. He's tough on surface but caring if you show up to office hour
I had Dr. Koide for Chemical Biology. His research is more closely related to chemical biology and it shows, as he's very passionate about the course. He loves to answer questions and he's very approachable. He clearly outlines exam topics and tests felt fair. All four exams were worth about 50% of the grade, which was nice wiggle room.
If you are looking for a professor that cares about your well being during a pandemic, look somewhere else. Picks and chooses the questions he wants to answer, instructions for test days are nonexistent, unwilling to accommodate wishes of students. If you take ochem online with him, have fun stressing out for an entire semester.
Koide is by far the worst professor I've had at Pitt. He did not explain exam procedures and does not know how to use the technology he requires (gradescope). He will lower your exam grade after he releases it and does not care that he is going against the Academic Integrity Policy. Have fun because he is disrespectful and condescending.
Ochem 2 is always going to be difficult; Koide is a solid choice. BIGGEST piece of advice is master the practice question packets. If you can do every problem in the packet, you can ace his tests. Also, I happened to attend lecture on a day where he gave a pop-quiz for up to 10 points extra credit, so attend lecture bc otherwise you might miss out.
Professor Koide's ochem 1 class is not as bad as a lot of the reviews during the pandemic are saying. Yes, he had trouble with online exam logistics but that's not a big deal considering that by now he knows what he's doing. His lectures are somewhat fast paced, but it's ochem so it has to be. He is pretty funny which makes his lectures interesting
The review bombing on Kaz is very misleading. Many Organic professors get this because students don't put their own effort in to the class. Read the book, go to any of dozens of tutoring/office hours, do the recitation sheets, and do book problems. If this sounds like too much, don't take o chem. The class is hard regardless of the prof.
I don't think he'd be terrible in person, but online with him was unbearable. Grade is only 3 midterms + final. He has a super think accent that made it really difficult for me to understand the class, and he wasn't the best at taking questions. Doesn't do any practice in class really and gives little practice help. He's v hard, but that's ochem!
Professor Koide is definitely strict and a tough grader but it forced me to really learn the material. Definitely read the textbook to supplement Koide's lecture notes and do the chapter review packets because they're super helpful in preparing for exams. Yes, he only grades on 3 midterms and the final exam but he's very clear about what he expects
Even for the standard of ochem being hard, Koide was still an awful professor. The grading rubric of his class being only exams is ridiculous, the organization of the class was nonexistent, and he is condescending. Submitting regrades, even if your answer is a mirror image of the exam key, he'll find obscure reasons to take off points anyway.
Koide was an OK professor. Your grade is composed of only 3 midterms and 1 final with little to no partial credit available. Personally, I didn't really learn well from attending his lectures but you can tell that he tries. OChem is hard regardless of the professor so be prepared to study.
Ochem is hard, but I think that Koide isn't as bad as people say. He did his best during lectures, and his practice exams are almost exactly like his actual exams and he gives out practice problems for each chapter. He also gave some extra credit by asking questions or going to class. If he's your only choice, just know you have to put in work.
Throughout the semester I really liked him and thought he was given a bad rap however upon final grades, he gave no information on curving or what was going on. At the end, we had no idea what we got on each exam (curved). He also gave almost no feedback for exams and most questions were all or nothing and very little partial credit was possible.
Dr. Koide makes orgo passable if you're willing to work. If you stay ON TOP of lectures and DO THE recitation problems you'll be ok, he tells you what you need to know, I never even opened the textbook. There is no homework and the recitation packets are his old exam problems. He curves each test a lot and does a huge curve after the final too.
His class wasn't great, the material is hard and he isn't the best professor in the world. He wouldn't be my first choice; however, he didn't completely suck. Getting help from outside resources is definitely a good idea for his class. Technology was definitely not his strong suit. He also uses Microsoft teams instead of canvas which I didn't like.
Dr Koide made ochem harder than it should be. Couldnt understand him in his lectures and exams were so hard(you are only graded on exams). He does give a decent curve which I'm hoping will be enough to pass. You also don't know know your grade until after the semester because he doesn't upload grades and he uses Microsoft Teams which is annoying.
Lectures were extremely boring and slow. Exams are difficult, but doable. His recitation worksheets are similar to the style of the questions he asks on exams, but sometimes recitation questions are easier. Overall, he is very approachable and even delayed an exam due to unfortunate events on campus. Highly recommend using outside sources.
dont take him. can't understand a thing he says during lecture, not clear what you're expected to know on exams, and you basically have to teach yourself bc so much is unclear. he doesn't give partial credit on exams and took off points for stuff i did correctly but incorrectly in his terms. if you want to learn ochem, don't take him.
took 1710 & 1711. he did NOT want to be there and screwed me over w 1711. had to drop the course with 3 weeks left in the semester bc he gave us the wrong criteria for the class. told us to write a 1500 word paper when it was really supposed to be 25 pages. 1710 is easy and attendance based but id still avoid him
Ochem with Koide is challenging, but doable if you stay on top of the material. The lectures can be dry, but the practice exams are quite helpful. Leverage resources like unstuck ai alongside the textbook to prepare effectively.
HWs were a pain but unlimited attempts. Lectures aren't recorded but he does post notes+ lots of practice. Exams are straightforward, pretty similar to problem sets, generous grading. He promised a curve and doesn't restrict the number of A/B grades either. This class is still a very heavy workload but if you memorize everything you'll be fine
Dr. Koide was great! HW's were a bit time consuming but he gives unlimited attempts. He posts lecture notes after every chapter. Be sure to study the problem sets he provides because these are similar to his exam questions. Higher exam difficulty + lower exam averages as the semester progresses. Approx 20% curve at the end! Definitely recommend!
Honestly never really liked organic chem until his class. Although the lectures were dry, he was straight forward with the information. Aleks was a bit annoying, but it genuinely did help me grasp the basic concepts. I highly recommend doing the practice problems when preparing for the exams. Generous with his curve, if the class had a good average
I was nervous going in due to his reviews, but Koide was great. Lectures were clear, exams were fair, and grading was generous. You do have to put effort in, but it's nothing crazy. By the end, I had a good enough grasp of the subject that I could just intuitively figure out enough of the final exam material to pass without actually studying it.
Orgo exams have 60-70% average no matter what class, Koide gives so much prep work though: practice exams, problems, Alek modules, textbook. Recommend studying a week in advance. His accent can be hard sometimes, but 80% of the time its fine. He's hard to reach out of class, but his TA's are great. Study hard, don't fall behind and it'll be okay!
I would highly recommend not taking him. You are only graded by 3 exams and the final, and he does not tell you your grade until the very end of the semester. Additionally, his grading is unfair and he takes off points if you did not do it his way. Not approachable after class and hard to reach over email.
His lectures are very dry, and he is not accommodating for students taking exams in the testing center on campus due to the disability accommodations. He expects students learning Orgo for the very first time to know it all as well as he does to succeed on exams. He does not curve his exams until the very end. I would give a zero if I could.
If you want to pass Orgo with Dr. Koide, get ready to attend office hours, self-learn content, and watch numerous videos to pass his course. His lectures are dry, but are somewhat engaging as he brings in some personal examples from his research and experience. Don't get me wrong, he is a very knowledgeable chemist, but for teaching...not so much.
All the averages for the exams are pretty low but he does curve at the end, but doesn't tell you the curve. Graded on 4 exams and ALEKS. He gives lots of practice problems, previous exams, and the AlEKS work does help. He is NOT a good lecturer. He expects you to know what he is saying, and it sounds like gibberish. Be prepared to teach yourself.
If you're unsettled about having to put in a lot of work in an ochem class, chem requires time and energy, that won't ever change. He gives so many practice problems, and his office hours help. I actually liked his class, and for those who say they can't understand him, it's weird to say that, he's easy to understand, you just have weird biases.
He expects you to do everything on the exams his specific way even if it contradicts the textbook. He's just is a terrible lecturer and expects us to have the same level of knowledge as him. He went out of the country and didn't tell us until a few days before the exam and cancelled his office hours. He also disables the grades and doesn't tell you
Dr. Koide is not as bad as he is made out to be. All of the orgo professors at Pitt are just ok. It's a hard class no matter who you take it with, so do not stress if you get Dr. Koide. His class is passable. He provides practice exams and worksheets that are typically very similar to his actual exams - whether its similar concepts or problems.
I have tripled my dose of anxiety med since taking this class. I have never felt dumber than going to his lectures because he explains every topic like he is explaining to graduate students. If you think this class is manageable you are out of your mind. I think its honestly the TA's themselves writing the reviews. He is so difficult to understand.
Dr. Koide is very intelligent but terrible at lecturing. He expects us to be at a much higher level and seems to show no hope for our success. His lectures are dry and very difficult to understand. The exams are hard and must be done his way.
exams were difficult, but he provided practice problems and exams. orgo is difficult no matter who you have, his lectures were just very dry and hard to follow. super nice guy just not the best professor.
People hate on Dr. Koide but he is actually a great professor for ochem! Don't be afraid to go to him/TA to ask questions they are there to help, just be respectful. Asking the WHY is what is what you have to do if you want to thoroughly understand and score well. Go to lecture and do all the practice problems he gives. Figure out trouble spots.
Accent was hard to understand, barely gives partial credit on exams (so frustrating), one of our averages was 51% cause he's a shite professor. Some exam problems were similar to practice he gave, other exam problems were like nothing we've ever seen. He posts his lecture notes, but they're only partially filled out so going to class is helpful.
Just grind practice problems and ask questions. You can also look over your midterms to see where you went wrong. Look over the topics before lecture so you have a better idea of what is going on.
Very fair for an organic chemistry professor. If you print out his notes for class it makes it a lot easier to stay engaged as opposed to doing free style notes. He gives out worksheets and past exams which are very helpful. The textbook he uses is pretty garbage though, use 'Organic chemistry as a second language'.
Practice problems somewhat similar to exam questions. Three midterms and one final. He is literally unreachable via email which is really unhelpful! Limited number of regrades and he'll deduct points if it's not acceptable. He posts skeleton notes, so have to go to lecture to fill those in. Lectures boring and doesn't fully explain things (imo).
The exams are quite challenging, but you have access to previous exams and worksheets. The focus is on testing your understanding of the mechanism and process, not just the reaction itself. If you take the time to thoroughly learn the process, you should do well, and ideally, you'll get some extra help with the end-of-semester boost.
You are graded on three exams and a final. Some questions are super similar to practice exams and then others are things you've never seen before, so it is hard to know what to study. You definitely need to understand mechanisms rather than just memorizing. Him and the TA were so condescending when people asked questions
I wrote a short review cuz this is one of the worst classes I have ever taken but RMP won't let me post it
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
22%
Textbook Required
44%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.33 avg changeRatings by Course
OCHEM1
5.0
(2)OCHEM310
5.0
(1)OCHEM0320
4.0
(1)CHEM0340
4.0
(1)CHEM1810
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
SCIENCE
5.0
CHEM330
4.4
OCHEM2
4.2
CHEM0310
4.1
CHEM2310
4.0