4.0

Kevin Vandergriff

Philosophy - California State University - Sacramento

4.0
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
69%
Would Retake
92
Reviews
4.0
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
4.0
Helpful
3.9
Clarity

69%

Would Retake

92

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

59

4

4

3

8

2

11

1

10

What Students Say

He makes the class very easy and is very helpful

PHIL OO6 - 5.0 rating

His lectures are well structured, informative, engaging, and best of all they're funny as hell

PHIL006 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

41%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 82 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (19)
A (14)
B (13)
Grade Distribution
A(33)B(17)C(9)D(3)F(1)A-/B+(21)
Based on 90 reported grades
A+: 19
A: 14
B: 13
A-: 11
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (29)
Gives good feedback (22)
Tough grader (21)
Amazing lectures (21)
Get ready to read (16)
Caring (10)
Lots of homework (10)
Inspirational (9)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.63 avg change
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL OO6

5.0

(1)

PHIL103

4.9

(21)

PHIL61

4.8

(9)

PHIL02

4.7

(6)

PHIL002

4.0

(7)
+4 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL102

3.5

PHIL61

3.4

PHIL131

3.3

PHIL2

2.9

PHIL006

2.7

Reviews (92)
5.0
2.0
PHIL006
Grade: B+
Oct 13, 2015

Professor Vandergriff is a great teacher. He keeps class interesting, even though it is long and Philosophy can sometimes be very dry. I learned a lot more in a intro class then I thought I would. I would take a class he teaches again. He's approachable and fun. He's also passionate about philosophy and you can see this excitement in him.

5.0
2.0
PHIL OO6
Grade: A-
Oct 27, 2015

I have Professor Vandergriff for Phil 6- Intro to Philosophy. He lets you discuss all quiz questions before quizzes, and gives midterm study guides with the exam questions on it. He makes the class very easy and is very helpful. I recommend his class for a GPA booster. He even adjusts grading scale so everyone does well. I recommend this professor!

5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B+
Nov 25, 2015

Vandergriff is a great teacher. He is there for his students ands wants them to pass. He is very relatable and easy to talk to. Lectures are long, but he makes it fun and interesting. All in all, he was amazing and I would love to take his class again.

2.0
1.0
PHIL006
Grade: A
Dec 7, 2015

Class is incredibly easy.

2.0
2.0
PHIL006
Grade: A-
Dec 7, 2015

Do not take if you are a upperclass student. If you like long and mediocre teaching then take the class. I did not enjoy the professor's teaching style or unprofessionalism. Good luck to those who do!

5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B-
Dec 8, 2015

His lectures are well structured, informative, engaging, and best of all they're funny as hell. The course is an interesting combination of easy and difficult as well as informative, even for a philosophy major.

5.0
4.0
PHIL006
Grade: B+
Dec 8, 2015

Amazing professor. Extremely clear and helpful. He is a bit tough on grading the papers, but it is possible to get an A. Highly recommend this professor to anyone thinking about taking one of his courses.

5.0
1.0
PHIL006
Grade: Incomplete
Dec 8, 2015

Quizzes every week but gives you questions ahead of time and only requires one paper for the semester

3.0
2.0
PHIL006
Grade: A
Dec 10, 2015

Easy A. 11 group reading quizzes, emails questions before, word for word in textbook. 1 midterm 1 final both open note. Questions/answers are the cell phone quizzes. Lecture is 3 hours, extremely boring /confusing, I did not pay attention. 1 paper but only worth 10 points. I suggest taking this class with friends, buy one textbook for all & share.

5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 10, 2015

For a 3 hour class, the lecture isn't long. There are 2 10 min breaks, group discussions, video, and 3 quizzes each class. This is an intro GE course you are supposed to take those before you become an upper classman silly. It is full of freshman who don't want to be there. Easy A, no one has taken the final or turned in paper yet.

5.0
2.0
PHIL006
Grade: B+
Dec 15, 2015

every day in class was pretty fun. Even though the class was nearly 3 hours, he made it interesting. The midterm and final were open note and every quiz was a group quiz. I highly reccomend him. Also, don't waste $90 on the textbook, never even used it.

5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B
Dec 15, 2015

Cool dude. Would take him again. Kept it interesting. Learned a lot.

5.0
4.0
PHIL006
Grade: B-
Dec 22, 2015

Learned a lot. Made me want to read more philosophy.

4.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B
Apr 25, 2016

Mr. Vandergriff does a good job at making a boring class entertaining. I really enjoyed him last semester and thought he did a good job teaching. If you show up and study for the midterm/final, you'll pass.

5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B+
Nov 9, 2016
Would take again

Mr. Vandergriff is pretty cool. I like the way he lectures and he breaks up the long 3 hours class really well. He makes philosophy interesting! He gives you all of the questions to the test in his in class quizzes and the day before the test. Not too bad on the eyes, too ;)

Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
EXTRA CREDIT
2.0
2.0
PHIL006
Oct 10, 2017
Would take again

He is a really cool guy and knows alot but his lectures are boring! 3 hours is to long to be able to pay attention. However he trys his best ans normal throws in some interesting videos and the class is overall super easy. Open book midterm and final which is great. Reading quiz everyday... honestly don't need to read to get an A on the quizzes.

Caring
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B+
Dec 15, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Makes a boring class interesting but is a hard grader. He looks for specific answers in the homework. He offers a bunch of extra credit. The midterm and final were put online the day before so you show up and turn it in. Majority of the test is multiple choice and a few short response answers.

Tough Grader
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B
Oct 10, 2017
Would take again

He is a fun teacher. Class is too long, but he does a good job of breaking it up. I never thought Id be interested in philosophy! Homework and quizzes are easy if you do your work. Dont expect to skip the reading and pass. He is pretty handsome and seems like a genuinely good person. Id take a class of his again.

Respected
Inspirational
Hilarious
3.0
4.0
PHIL02
Grade: B
May 16, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Teacher is okay. His lectures are interesting and for the most part the class is easy. Quizzes, tests are don't require lot of work. His writing assignments on the other hand are hard. Don't take this class if you want an easy A and taking this class for GE. If you are philosophy major, then this is the guy for you.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
PHIL006
Grade: B
Apr 18, 2019
Would take again

It's an easy class, you actually learn, he lets you go early most of the time, doesn't drag, puts powerpoint on canvas, gives opportunities to people who show up to class, overall great class.

Test heavy
Hilarious
3.0
2.0
PHIL2
Dec 4, 2019
Would take again

LOTS of online quizzes but all the answers are online, so dont waste $ for the book. Easy class, but he uses sexual assault as an example for almost everything without any trigger warning. Class graded on a 100 point scale so missing a few questions on quizzes or tests really docks your grade

Lots of homework
Test heavy
3.0
4.0
PHIL2
Grade: B
Dec 9, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Took the 3 hours lecture class and is good at giving breaks in between. Basically have to attend every class so make a friend because his powerpoints have blank information you can only get in class. Weekly quizzes and midterm/final is online which is good because he goes over the questions that'll be on it in class. Every point is 1%.

Graded by few things
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
PHIL2
Grade: B-
Dec 18, 2019
Would take again

Even though attendance is not mandatory, there are certain questions you have to answer for your grade that you can only access by coming to class. He keeps it pretty entertaining and informative for most of the lecture. Probably expects students to care too much about philosophy, but that is only because he is passionate about philosophy.

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
PHIL2
Grade: A
Jan 28, 2020
Would take again

Super chill teacher. I had him for a 3-hour lecture, but he made it as entertaining as he could. He tried to finish early to let us go. He shows a couple of questions that he puts into the mid-term and final throughout the lectures so make sure to show up!

Respected
2.0
3.0
PHIL2
Grade: A-
Dec 11, 2020
Wouldn't take again

easy A class. hes not very compassionate during these troubling times so good luck with asking for any extensions. his lectures are really boring esp with his monotone voice. all the answers to the quizzes are online so thats helpful but there are 3 short writing assignments so you should at least understand the main points of the weekly topic

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
PHIL61
Grade: B+
Dec 16, 2020
Would take again

He is a good professor, bc of Covid it was online but he never went off script with the schedule. You get theme papers which were fairly easy (book NEEDED), he grades a lil tough in the beginning but let's you know what he's looking for. Midterm and Final which are all based off the books so get them!! My class never met over zoom.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Get ready to read
1.0
5.0
PHIL006
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Never would take this guy again. We never went over any of the stuff thats on the final and he didnt teach a single thing. Worst teacher experience Ive ever had. He made our final seem as if he is punishing us for some reason, very weird guy would not recommend his class at all.

3.0
3.0
PHIL2
Grade: A
Jan 8, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I already had some philosophy background so this class was not horrible. However, if you've never taken a philosophy class before I would maybe wait on this one. His recorded lectures are super long, but I will say extremely helpful! Watch his lectures and maybe once again and you will be fine.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
1.0
4.0
PHIL006
Grade: C
Jan 16, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I had him for Phil and I never had any background of this so it was pretty new. He was the WORST professor I HAVE GOTTEN. I do NOT recommend, he is not caring or compassionate. the quizzes were easy to find online but we had 3 short journal entries and was a tough grader, I really didn't know what he wanted from it. NOT WORTH IT

Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
PHIL002
Grade: C-
May 3, 2021
Wouldn't take again

His grading scale makes things really difficult to build up your grade. Our 80 exam question was only worth 20 points. Also, the weekly quizzes were only worth about 0.2 points per question. So if you screw up on one assignment you are screwed. Also for his short answer, he grades really tough. Don't take this course unless you got Phil experience.

Test heavy
Beware of pop quizzes
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
PHIL006
Grade: Not sure yet
May 14, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I honestly wouldn't recommend this professor for Philosophy 2. His lectures are long and boring. He grades harshly on your lecture journals and doesn't give any feedbacks on how to improve it.

Tough grader
2.0
4.0
PHIL002
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Sep 27, 2021
Wouldn't take again

The grading system is outrageous, with one point on each assignment being equivalent to one percentage of your entire grade. Does not help that this class was asynchronous.

Test heavy
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
3.0
PHIL2
Grade: B
Dec 17, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I really don't recommend this teacher. Everything is 1 point other than papers and midterm/final (which are worth 28!) His feedback is some ofthe worst I've seen. Gave me a D on a paper and was pretty condescending. I didnt even do one of the papers because its not worth it. Ended with B because I aced midterm/final and is worth more than anything

1.0
3.0
PHIL131
Grade: A-
Jan 2, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Im a philosophy lover and I was looking forward to this class. His lectures are okay a little monotone and not very engaging but he teaches the material. He will not help students with questions regarding homework or tests. He told another class mate that he was sorry she couldnt handle an upper division course. Wouldnt recommend.

Graded by few things
Tough grader
2.0
3.0
PHIL2
Grade: B
Jan 26, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Very tough grader

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
PHIL131
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 1, 2022

Avoid unless you love philosophy and have taken at least a few other philosophy classes. Not worth the hassle.

Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL131
Grade: D
May 25, 2022

Where to start, professor was super condescending and rude. I would advice everyone, if you can, take another course pls with any other professor. I accidentally turned in the wrong essay (it was an essay for another class) and when I corrected my mistake , I was literally two minutes late! Two minutes! I failed this class alone (got all As).

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
2.0
3.0
PHIL131
Grade: B
Jun 1, 2022

For some reason this professor is a super hard grader even though this is an intro course. Also all of the assignments are worth .25 points or .5 points. Excepts the exams are worth 20, so basically if you fail the exams, you fail the class. Also the same for the final essay. Don't believe the "good" ratings posted.

Tough grader
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
PHIL131
Grade: C+
May 26, 2022

This professor by far is the WORST professor I have ever experienced in my life. He expects you to be a philosopher before enrolling in his class.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
5.0
3.0
PHIL131
Grade: A
Jun 3, 2022
Would take again

Not an easy A so there will always be some incredibly upset students venting about this guy, but, if you are intellectually curious and willing to work near a college level, you should do well. The content of the lectures are very interesting, but not at a YouTube level of entertainment.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
5.0
2.0
PHIL131
Grade: B+
Jun 3, 2022
Would take again

Very clear and unbiased philosophical lectures using logic and evidence.

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
3.0
4.0
PHIL131
Grade: B
Aug 26, 2022
Would take again

Professor Vandergriff was logical and unbiased. - 3 video lectures that add up to about 2.5 -3 hours(tip: watch them at 1.5x speed) - Finals based off the lectures and practices quiz's - practices quiz's, non-graded, but required - class is based off 100 points grade scale, which was odd for me All around a decent professor, I would recommend him.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
PHIL131
Grade: A
Jan 6, 2023
Would take again

If you are a curious person, you will love this guy.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
5.0
4.0
PHIL61
Grade: A-
Jan 6, 2023
Would take again

Tough class but incredibly practical.

Amazing lectures
Accessible outside class
Online Savvy
3.0
3.0
PHIL131
Grade: B
Feb 2, 2023
Would take again

This was an asynchronous class. There were weekly quizzes and only a midterm and a final. The lectures were videos and the professor explained the content well. Overall, it was pretty easy.

Get ready to read
Accessible outside class
5.0
5.0
PHIL61
Grade: F
Jan 24, 2024
Would take again

super tough class because there is so much material and homework that you need to do outside of class. participation really matters and he grades attendance. Vandergriff is caring though and wants to help his students pass. class is also quiz/exam heavy. I didn't get the textbook even though he said it was required, personally just do the work.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
Caring
2.0
5.0
PHIL131
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Oct 1, 2024

It was a online-in person hybrid class. For some reason, this format apparently warrants a ridiculous amount of homework. The in-person lectures cover the same material as the video lectures, but you have to watch them before class to participate. It was a unreasonably stressful class for an intro class.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
5.0
5.0
PHIL61
Grade: C
Nov 10, 2024
Would take again

Retook this class and I don't regret it. The textbook is super helpful so get it. Lots of hw and material you need to do outside of class but it's super helpful, just do it. Mainly weekly exams with optional practice exams. Easy if you do the work to prepare for it. He even created an AI chat as a tutor for the class to use. Caring and great prof.

Lots of homework
Caring
Test heavy
5.0
4.0
PHIL103
Grade: A-
Nov 24, 2024
Would take again

If you read the textbook and put effort into the scenario prompts, you should pass the class with no problem. Make a quizlet with the questions and answers for the ungraded quizzes as questions are reused on exams. Make sure you understand Kantian deontology, virtue ethics, rule/act utilitarianism, and social contract theory for scenario analyses.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
5.0
2.0
PHIL02
Grade: A-
Dec 23, 2024
Would take again

I took this professors class as fully online. He can be a bit of a tough grader when it comes to the discussion boards which caught me off guard. He REALLY dissects them so just a heads up there. Regardless, his grading criteria was straight forward. I wouldn't call this an easy A, per se, but if you do all the work then you can easily get an A.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
4.0
4.0
PHIL61
Grade: B-
Jan 11, 2025

A very human teacher, he is engaging in class. His class is hard, and a lot of the tests are in person. But he really cares about people passing the class. If he knows people are struggling, he will make sure to help. Overall, a good professor if you really focus and listen to his lectures.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
2.0
5.0
PHIL103
Grade: A-
Jan 22, 2025

First 1/2 is very simple with quiz each week. Second 1/2 he demands you write 10 sentence response for analysis and 10 sentence reply for a meager 5 points. I think two of them required 40 sentence responses. He doesn't even read them but grades using AI, and it's extremely harsh. Putting in 100% effort does not get an A. CS majors avoid him!

Tough grader
Graded by few things
5.0
4.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

All the negative, fallacious, speculative, unsupported claims against this professor are from emotionally immature biased and sad human beings who do not take responsibility for their lives and sometimes in our modern age even place the blame on AI!

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL61
Grade: B+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

An Abercrombie philosophy angel who can stand to lose 40 pounds

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Inspirational
5.0
4.0
PHIL103
Grade: A-
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Bretton Millar is a CS major at CSUS who in discord revealed he has a personal vendetta against this professor simply because he didn't score as high as he wanted. So Bretton, being the angry immature incel he is, has taken to smearing this professor with baseless AI abuse claims and unfounded negative reviews. A true keyboard warrior.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
3.0
PHIL002
Grade: C+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Doesn't like Donald Trump or McDonalds a true American

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
5.0
2.0
PHIL02
Grade: B+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

I think he has autism so it's hard for him to make eye contact but he's a great teacher

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
PHIL131
Grade: C+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

I thought I was leaving a review for Rick and Morty

EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
5.0
4.0
PHIL61
Grade: C-
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Rate My Professor suffers from self-selection bias since only motivated students leave reviews, usually those who loved or hated the professor. This creates voluntary response bias, making the sample unrepresentative of all students. The result is a polarized view that exaggerates praise and criticism rather than accuracy.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHIL02
Grade: C
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Hell is other people

Lots of homework
Caring
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
PHIL61
Grade: B
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

What happened to the chili pepper rating

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
5.0
1.0
PHIL002
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Zero stars because I failed. Would give negative stars if possible. Also, class started at 9 AM, which feels like a personal attack.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

This professor RUINED my GPA by expecting me to read. Completely unfair. 1/5.

EXTRA CREDIT
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
1.0
PHIL002
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Gives long, complicated lectures on ‘ethics' but wouldn't round my 59.4% to an A. Hypocrisy at its finest.”

Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
Lots of homework
5.0
1.0
PHIL002
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Expects us to ‘engage critically' with the material but didn't appreciate my 12-page rebuttal on why I deserve an A. Make it make sense.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
1.0
PHIL02
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Class was way too hard. I came here to learn philosophy, not to think.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

How am I supposed to pass if the professor refuses to post the entire exam on Quizlet?

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
1.0
PHIL006
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Final was just one question: ‘What is truth?' Bro, I'm here for an easy gen ed, not a spiritual awakening.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Group projects
5.0
1.0
PHIL61
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Apparently, just because I ‘didn't show up, didn't turn in assignments, and didn't take the final,' I ‘didn't pass.' What happened to ‘thinking outside the box'?

Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
Lots of homework
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Took this class to meet girls. Left knowing more about Kant than I ever wanted.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Hilarious
5.0
1.0
PHIL02
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

I'm a time traveler from 2045. This guy is still teaching, still refuses to curve grades.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Pretty sure this professor is AI-generated. No human should know this much epistemology.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL006
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Lectures were engaging, and the professor knows his stuff. Just make sure to keep up with readings.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Hilarious
5.0
1.0
PHIL131
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

This class really makes you think. Like, way too much. I haven't known peace since Week 3.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

Tried to explain quantum mechanics to impress my friends. Now I have no friends. 10/10 class.

Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHIL002
Grade: A+
Mar 1, 2025
Would take again

The syllabus didn't tell me what to do in the event of a zombie apocalypse. Poor planning. 2/5.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 2, 2025
Would take again

Professor gave me an A, but in the grand scheme of the universe, does that even mean anything?

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 2, 2025
Would take again

Professor refused to let me write my final essay in interpretive dance. If Socrates were alive today, he'd be ashamed

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A+
Mar 2, 2025
Would take again

Professor says ‘there are no stupid questions,' but when I asked if I could submit my final as a TikTok, suddenly there were rules.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A-
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

Vandergriff explains complex philosophical ideas in a way that actually makes sense. He responds quickly to questions and provides detailed feedback, which really helps with improving your work. Be prepared to participate!

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Caring
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

This is a class where effort matters. Vandergriff challenges students, but he's also fair and willing to help. His feedback is thorough, and if you take his advice seriously, you'll grow academically.

Gives good feedback
Caring
Online Savvy
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

Expect to do a lot of thinking in this class. Vandergriff's lectures are well-organized, and he makes sure students engage with the material. You'll need to stay on top of the readings, but it's worth it.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

If you appreciate structured learning and in-depth discussions, this is the professor for you. He gives great feedback and encourages critical thinking. Just don't expect an easy A—he makes you earn it.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

Professor Vandergriff runs a tight ship, but it's one that helps you improve as a student. His lectures are detailed, participation is key, and he expects students to engage with the material. Definitely worth taking.

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

A challenging but rewarding class. Vandergriff explains things well and gives constructive feedback, though you'll need to stay on top of the workload. If you're willing to put in the effort, you'll get a lot out of it.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

This class will make you work, but in a good way. The material is challenging, but Vandergriff presents it clearly, and he's always open to questions. His grading is fair but firm—come prepared!

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Caring
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

Vandergriff sets high expectations, but he also gives students the tools to meet them. His lectures are well-organized, and his feedback is useful. If you're looking for an easy class, this isn't it, but if you want to learn, take it.

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Inspirational
5.0
1.0
PHIL103
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2025
Would take again

It's college and he gets it

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Respected
3.0
3.0
PHIL102
Grade: A-
May 24, 2025

AVOID HIM. It is my first time, and this professor advised me to drop his class, but here we are. Don't expect him to give you more time with any homework or projects. Homework is due every Wednesday and Sunday. Has no final exams but has an Ethical Practice Plan, around a 1600-word essay worth half your grade. When EVALUATIONS come, be prepared.

Group projects
Lots of homework
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL102
Grade: C
Dec 12, 2025

This professor sucks. it is not even his lectures you're listening to.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
So many papers
1.0
3.0
PHIL102
Grade: B
Dec 15, 2025

Was a meh online class. He doesn't use his own lecturers and he uses AI to help give feedback on discussions. Found it a bit ironic that he said that if we used AI in our final, that'd be an automatic 0 but found out through LinkedIn that he's getting his masters with a focus in AI.

2.0
3.0
PHIL102
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 16, 2025

Pretty sure he used AI/ChatGPT to grade while discouraging students from using it. We didn't even watch his lectures, just random automated ones IMO. No deadline flexibility at all; he'll suggest dropping instead. Extra credit exists and although feedback is detailed its AI-generated. I'd avoid PHIL102 with him and take another professor.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
Online Savvy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

41%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 82 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (19)
A (14)
B (13)
Grade Distribution
A(33)B(17)C(9)D(3)F(1)A-/B+(21)
Based on 90 reported grades
A+: 19
A: 14
B: 13
A-: 11
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (29)
Gives good feedback (22)
Tough grader (21)
Amazing lectures (21)
Get ready to read (16)
Caring (10)
Lots of homework (10)
Inspirational (9)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.63 avg change
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL OO6

5.0

(1)

PHIL103

4.9

(21)

PHIL61

4.8

(9)

PHIL02

4.7

(6)

PHIL002

4.0

(7)
+4 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL102

3.5

PHIL61

3.4

PHIL131

3.3

PHIL2

2.9

PHIL006

2.7

Similar Professors