3.2

Larry Hannant

History - Camosun College

3.2
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
114
Reviews
3.2
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
3.2
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

114

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

27

4

31

3

27

2

14

1

15

What Students Say

I was so interested in this subject until the class started

HIST100 - 2.0 rating

Hard to pay attention

HIST104 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
B (2)
Rather_Not_Say (1)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(2)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 5 reported grades
B: 2
Rather_Not_Say: 1
A: 1
A-: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.42 avg change
Aug
Oct
Dec
Jan
Feb
Jun
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

106

5.0

(1)

11210120

5.0

(1)

HIST304

5.0

(1)

H1122022

5.0

(1)

HST1060822

5.0

(1)
+31 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HISTORY108

5.0

HIST232

5.0

HISTHIST

5.0

HIST145

5.0

HIST235

4.3

Reviews (114)
4.0
4.0
HST
Mar 27, 2002

nice, but not easy

2.0
4.0
HST112
Aug 17, 2002

No Comments

5.0
3.0
HST
Sep 19, 2002

No Comments

1.0
3.0
HIST110
Oct 22, 2002

No Comments

5.0
3.0
HISTORY
Dec 3, 2002

Best Canadain History Prof ever!

3.0
4.0
HIST100
Dec 6, 2002

He is nice and very smart. Hard marker with high expectations!

3.0
3.0
HIST106
Dec 17, 2002

Very methodical and smart, but always HAS to mention he is DR. Larry Hannant.

5.0
2.0
HIST
Dec 26, 2002

Very fair, and easy to do well if you understand him. Great instructor.

1.0
5.0
HIST110
Jan 7, 2003

No Comments

4.0
4.0
HIST112
Jan 10, 2003

Okay, we know you have your doctorate, but learn some manners, Larry! Really...

3.0
4.0
HIST110
Jan 29, 2003

good lectures, hard tests

5.0
4.0
HIST
Feb 13, 2003

knows his stuff, and expects you too as well!

4.0
5.0
HIST108
Feb 27, 2003

Nice guy, really helpful but really hard!

5.0
2.0
HIST304
Mar 8, 2003

This is a senior undergraduate course that he teaches at UVic. In general he is very clear and is certainly a master of historical material. As for grades, everyone I have talked to in the class thinks he is very fair--a lot of great grades came back.

5.0
2.0
HIST112
Mar 12, 2003

Larry really knows his stuff.I heard horror stories about him but I really like him, he's a fair marker and an excellent teacher. No BS

5.0
3.0
HIST110
Mar 13, 2003

great guy but his tests are brutal

5.0
4.0
HIST100
Apr 12, 2003

So clear you can practically see through him.

4.0
5.0
HIST110
Jun 9, 2003

very clear, doesn't waste time in class. makes a point of teaching from diverse and interesting viewpoints.

2.0
5.0
HIST110
Jun 22, 2003

nice guy, try hard, sub standard

4.0
3.0
HIST112
Jul 22, 2003

Nice guy, hard marker but really fair.

1.0
5.0
HIST110
Sep 6, 2003

Can't stand the guy, class is a total bore and he marks way too hard!

1.0
5.0
HIST112
Sep 16, 2003

worst teacher every, says "it Univeristy level" but we are college students in a first year class. get real to everyone who marked him good, the guys' a joke and his class it too

3.0
4.0
HIST110
Nov 13, 2003

I should have stuck with the class. Dry and lots of reading, but later realized I learned a lot from him. Get to know him and he can be really caring and helpful. I was totally terrified, which wasn't a good approach at all. Go to learn.

4.0
3.0
HST
Nov 14, 2003

This guy would make an exellent advisor to any political master like Stalin. Tends to be very fair providing one has woven the correct polemical slant in one's paper. I recommend reassignment to Henchmen for Lost Causes 101.

5.0
2.0
11210120
Nov 19, 2003

Very organized, and precise. Lectures flow smoothly,fits all the pieces of the puzzle together. Will do great if you are able to take a lot of information,and see how it relates to themes and concepts in a larger picture.

4.0
4.0
HST
Nov 25, 2003

Well written Larry!

3.0
4.0
HISTORY
Dec 1, 2003

Worthwhile class for those who enjoy History. Near 2hour lectures can be hard to sit through. Hard exams, minimal essay writing. Glad I had him.

2.0
4.0
HIST110
Dec 1, 2003

Oh my gosh! Most dull and boring teacher ever. History isnt that interesting of a course to begin with, he sure doesnt help the fact at all! Horrible, and DULL teacher!

5.0
2.0
HIST112
Dec 4, 2003

More concise, clear, and interesting than the other one I had. Stays on topic. Says UH a bit too much tho, Breathe, Larry! Doesn't go too fast though... Very easy compared to History 110! Hurrah for 3-Question Quizzes and NO essays!

5.0
3.0
HIST110
Dec 9, 2003

The class ranged widely in terms of previous knowledge yet he mangaged to keep a maximum of students interested. Also, he did not treat slower students condisendingly during seminars if they didn't answer what he wanted but they tried

1.0
5.0
HIST110
Apr 22, 2004

Worst teacher I've ever had in my life!!!

1.0
5.0
HIST112
May 6, 2004

when I didn't think post confederation Canada could get any more boring...along came Larry and his monotone voice. The only good thing that came from this class is now I have a book to make me fall asleep at night!!!!!!!

4.0
5.0
HIST112
Jun 16, 2004

Larry is a great guy, he's very helpful and was really accomadating when I wanted to register for the class.Tons of reading...TONS!Exams are soul crushing.If you are looking for a casual course on Cdn Hist look elsewhere. For passionate historians only!

5.0
3.0
H1122022
Aug 5, 2004

His lectures vary with the material. Cdn history was very dull, but 19th century world was very good. Tough exams, very personable

4.0
4.0
HIST112
Aug 10, 2004

Very thorough, although I believe he subscribes to the death-by-reading philosophy...

2.0
4.0
HIST112
Nov 11, 2004

Avoid taking 112 with him or any class. Monotone voice. Hard exams.

5.0
3.0
HIST
Grade: B
Dec 21, 2004

Not too sure what the big deal is, he's one of the best history profs out there, he just expects you learn the info. Try Uvic's History department, if you really want to **** about hard markers, otherwise do the work and stop whining.

4.0
4.0
108
Feb 20, 2005

Not an easy teacher but very knowledgeable and willing to help if you have individual problems. On the other hand, way way way too much dry reading.

3.0
5.0
HIST122
Apr 21, 2005

Probably one of the worst teachers I've had at Camosun. Hard marker (which is fine, but I think he forgot that it was a 100 level course)and snooty comments on papers/exams. The material was interesting and relavent, he just didn't do it justice.

3.0
5.0
HISTORY108
Apr 22, 2005

interesting instructor,answers questions in riddles and seems to enjoy it.demanding teacher, challenging.could use a little "sharpening of the saw," i think - maybe a little attitude adjustment would help..????

2.0
5.0
HIST
Jun 14, 2005

Before taking his 1600- 1970 class I loved history but afterwards I couldn't get out of there faster! His hour disscusions seemed to go on for 3 hours and his monotone voice put you to sleep! Not to metion his weird obsession with rearanging the desks in the class before starting it and moving everyone around in the middle of classes!

5.0
3.0
HST1060822
Jul 7, 2005

C'mon, Hannant's well-read and proves it in his lectures. He's also a pretty nice guy. Forget the comment below; this clown thinks he can discredit Hannant when he can barely spell or write? He's probably just testy because Dr. Hannant woke him from his hangover when he moved the desks. Remember: you can't cast pearls before swine.

5.0
4.0
HISTORY
Jul 22, 2005

I had Larry several years ago and still regard him as one of the best profs at Camosun. He is very clear and organized, and his teaching style demands that students really know their stuff.

4.0
5.0
HIST235
Oct 17, 2005

Okay, granted Larry knows his****, however he can be a real hardass on quality of work. He's merciless when it comes essay errors and is quite full of himself. Fine, he's a good teacher, but could loosen up around the collar and stop bragging about his books. (Which by the way are terribly boring...) My opinion only. Please, make one yourself!

2.0
3.0
HISTORY106
Nov 3, 2005

for those of you who are hoping to actually go somewhere with history, i do not recommend larry as a teacher, he is SO unclear and famous for rambling and going off topic. i found it very hard to take good notes because i was never quite sure what he was talking about. he's a nice guy and he means well but his teaching abilities are lacking.

1.0
4.0
235
Nov 15, 2005

A professor that encourages students to drop out??? Lectures are filled with üseless prepositions to fill time while he's thinking about what he's saying - very confusing for notes. Goes FAR off topic at any question. He makes it clear that he reads his own ratings on RMP first day of class...maybe should impliment some of the ideas.

3.0
3.0
HIST106
Nov 22, 2005

Larry's not so bad. He is a smart man, and definitely knows his stuff. You have to be willing to work hard and study. It's a difficult first year course. That's college. He's not going to babysit you!It's not about how well he teaches, it's about how much you're willing to teach yourself and how dedicated you are. Welcome to college.

2.0
4.0
HIST235
Nov 22, 2005

Hands down, the most stupifyingly inarticulate prof I’ve ever had. Every lecture was two hours of ‘um’ and ‘ah.’ His reputation as a ‘hard’ prof comes from his insistence on scholarly sources, but his idea of intellectualism is wallowing in facile anti-Americanism; there’s no ‘hard’ think

3.0
3.0
HISTORY100S
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Dec 6, 2005

larry you are the man.keep up the good work and dont listen too much to these comments-unless there is truth to them.the world needs more historians so be patient and remember its part of your job to inspire young people to learn history-and also what you may find intersting students may hate-so maybe consider them a little more. larry rules!

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Dec 16, 2005

I was looking forward to this 1900-1945 class before taking it. But Hannant managed to turn me off history. There's a ridiculous amount of reading each week and no real way to gauge how you're doing in the course until the last week before the final. The only assignments are the term paper and final. I recommend another prof if youre thinking of 10

5.0
4.0
HIST106
Dec 28, 2005

Very good class. Only complaint - there was no midterm (as a sample of his marking for the final). There is lots of reading for the seminars. Text is skimable and you can usually pull out the important parts. Likes to use political cartoons. Fair marker. Essay topics are very broad and general leaving room to insert your ideas. Would take him again

2.0
4.0
HIS106
Jan 3, 2006

um, ah, okay then... a sample of the most meandering, ridiculously confusing prof I've ever encountered. All A's this semester except Hannant's course which I take full responsibility for, because I was THAT bored. No midterm, makes it hard to figure out final and his paper expectations are way too high.

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Mar 17, 2006

children struggle with work and critical thought.i've taken 2 classes with larry and each time watched people drop out and complain,rather than work hard.then they come here and try and make a PHD, multiple time author look like the reason they got a bad grade - how pathetic.

5.0
1.0
106
Mar 21, 2006

GREAT

3.0
5.0
HISTORY
Mar 27, 2006

I respect Larry as a author and as a scholar of History. Being a student majoring in history and political science i am amazed at Larrys intellect. But his marking is gruesome. For first year history courses , he marks them as 3rd or 4th year courses. He lectures like he writes, which is dry, and he turns alot of students off of history.

1.0
5.0
HIST232
Apr 28, 2006

I respect that Larry is a very hard working author, but i found the class SO dry. Burnt toast dry. He reminded me of Lumberg from Office Space."Mmmm.... yeeeaaahh." His monotone voice made me lapse into a coma. Also, the textbook was almost as boring as his lectures, but at least it could be used as a pillow.

1.0
3.0
HIST1080
May 18, 2006

Not a big fan. After giving me an idea for my final essay he pretty much undermined the fact that I chose it and because he disagreed with my opinion of the peice he graded me lower. I shouldn't have to agree with his opinion to get a good grade.

4.0
4.0
HIST108122
Aug 2, 2006

Hands down, Larry is the best instructor I've had yet at Camosun. He is both a wealth of information and a fair marker. I look forward to taking more classes from the man.

1.0
5.0
HIST122
Sep 19, 2006

This man should be fired and shipped overseas. He is the worst teacher I have EVER had, the very definition of knowledge should not be placed anywhere near the traits that this man has. He is boring, mindless, narrow minded, and self centered. Very hard grading and very vague when asked about assignments or tests. Pathetic..

3.0
3.0
HIST111
Sep 19, 2006

I need a pillow in this class - I used to LOVE history but I find myself needing a nap before, during and after his class. I hope my opinion changes on this guy but I completely dread his class... but I will remember to read his text because otherwise I am about as Clueless as Cher (from the show Clueless).... yeah.

4.0
4.0
HIST235
Oct 24, 2006

larry is tough, no doubt about it.but how should college be?i guess at camo there are many idiots longing for a return to high school and the ease of it.larry might be the best prof in camo's history department.

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Nov 4, 2006

Hrm yes my feelings about this class have not changed, but he's becoming less dry and is atleast showing a small sense of humor.

2.0
3.0
HIST106
Dec 10, 2006

No Comments

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Dec 12, 2006

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST110
Dec 17, 2006

No Comments

5.0
3.0
HIST110
Jan 9, 2007

Larry is a great proffesor. I highly recommend this class if your not fresh out of high school and expecting an easy grade. He marks hard but if you do the work (such as reading the text) the class is great and an A is achievable!

4.0
5.0
HIST106
Jan 14, 2007

Very hard marker, not for the faint of heart or those who think that they could earn a good mark by simply sitting in class. However, I liked him a lot, and I will take one of his classes again.

1.0
5.0
HIST112
Jan 22, 2007

I really disliked him, he was a hard marker and shot down every idea you had.if you opinion is not his opinion, when he is asking for your opinion (make sence?) then he will look past you. JERK!

2.0
5.0
HIST110
Mar 8, 2007

I wasn't happy with the class but you did learn a lot from it. He was only focused on his own opinion and no one elses. Hard marker.

3.0
4.0
HISTA
Sep 13, 2007

Larry is an incredible brillant person who expects others to be, so yes he is a hard marker. However, he is deffinatly a great prof. His knowledge is not just limited to books, but rather real life. He lays out the entire course for you all you have to due is jump through the hoops.

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Oct 22, 2007

I can't stand Hannant's class. He is opinionated and doesn't appreciate a variety of opinions (although you'd think a seminar would be a good place for discussion/debate). Hard marker and his lectures are terrible. Half the time I have no idea what he is talking about, not very good for note taking. I don't recommend his class.

4.0
3.0
HIST106
Dec 8, 2007

No Comments

5.0
2.0
HIST122
Feb 22, 2008

Very helpful and interesting in lecture. Listened to other people and was a fair marker on exams and papers. Knowledgable, kinda funny, and the class was easy!

4.0
3.0
HIST122
Apr 14, 2008

Larry is... Larry. You either love him or hate him. Very intelligent, as helpful as he can be, but by no means easy. There is a lot of reading, the tests are hard, and you might find yourself constantly ranting from frustration. Still, though - if you are looking to learn some serious History, his class is where it's at. Just work hard!

4.0
5.0
HIST104
May 3, 2008

Larry is intelligent and enthusiastic about history. He is disorganized at times.His classes are not easy; he is a fair marker but you need to work hard for an A. My criticism of Larry is that many of his readings are very hard left, with little to balance them out.E.g, I did not feel we got a fair overview of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

3.0
5.0
HIST104
Sep 9, 2008

Although Larry's lectures are disorganized, if you put in the work to go through the information he gives you, you will be surprised at how much he has to teach. Hardest class ever. Learned more from him than most of my other teachers. Enough said.

5.0
1.0
HIST108
Oct 28, 2008

I found Larry'sd class really easy, but you do have to be at least a little motivated to actually work. If your having problems he'll bend over backwards for you, though you wouldn't know it to look at him. Honestly, what he really needs is to crack a joke once in a while. I've met morticians with a better sense of humour.

1.0
5.0
HIST106
Oct 28, 2008

He studders in his lectures, and is impossible to take notes on. He also doesn't lecture using the textbook. So it's hard to study when you don't have any notes from his lectures since some of the material is not in the textbook. NOT RECOMENDED!

3.0
4.0
HIST250
Oct 29, 2008

Really nice guy but his lectures are really hard to follow (lots of ums and uhs) and his seminars are done in such a way that only a minority of the class seems to speak.

1.0
5.0
HIST110
Dec 10, 2008

Larry gives the worst lectures imaginable, and has managed to completely ruin history for more than half the class. He gives little to no feedback, is biased, and not-so-subtley attempts to convert the class to communism. I highly recommend you run the other way.

3.0
4.0
HIST250
Dec 14, 2008

This class is hard but rewarding. Hannant is highly intelligent and academic. His lectures are very interesting but can be hard to follow. It is VERY important to know how to take good notes. If you want to be challenged this is an exceptional class but stay away if you expect an easy A. That said I would definitely take another class from Hannant.

4.0
4.0
HIST250
Jan 18, 2009

Hannant is one of the best profs I have come across during my many years in the post secondary world. He is tough but fair and makes himself available for advice. Many students are unnecessarily intimidated by his intelligence and miss his quirky sense of humour altogether. I loved my classes though they were a challenge. Definately recommended.

4.0
4.0
HST104
Apr 15, 2009

Dropped the ball on this one. He's a smart man, but I've yet to see him figure out how to actually teach his students... Or, at the very least, get ORGANIZED so that his students have a shot at teaching themselves...

3.0
3.0
HIST106
Oct 20, 2009

How to put it? The course is a good one, but he doesn't add any humor, even if he is inspired by world history :(Otherwise, if you use the textbook, not many useful note is class, then you should be okay)

2.0
3.0
HIST106
Oct 29, 2009

His teaching technique is not favourable. He goes on about (well what he is talking about is unclear) his seminars seem to be centred around him and the discussion leader. The assignments are unclear. If you read the text book you'll be okay but that's about it. Seems kinda pointless to have him teach if all you learn is from the text book.

2.0
3.0
HIST106
Dec 1, 2009

Long drawn out lectures which do nothing except evoke sleepiness and doodling. The marking for the mandatory "discussions" is rife with favoritism. You can just skip the lectures and read the text book. Its more interesting.

4.0
2.0
HIST106
Dec 2, 2009

Larry's lectures are awesome if you are interested in the subject. I didn't open my textbook all semester and got an A. He cares about the subject, and is passionate when he speaks, which keeps you interested. I hate the weekly discussions. I still don't understand how he decides on your mark for that part. You can talk all class and not get 10/10.

4.0
2.0
HIST106
Apr 5, 2010

Larry clearly cares a lot about history and has a great deal of knowledge. If you follow his lecture notes by using the book or taking notes, you'll do fine in the course. Discussions really depend on who's there and what class you're taking. They can be great, other times very dry. It really depends largely on the STUDENTS. Great Course.

5.0
2.0
HIST104
Apr 8, 2010

Larry is a great professor. Extremely intelligent and thoughful. You need to be prepared to learn, write well and put in some effort in his courses. If you are not a first-year post-secondary student, this courses will be the best you ever take. History of the Middle East is an amazing course, well designed and great material.

4.0
4.0
HIST108
Apr 18, 2010

For a first year hist teacher, Hannant was fairly poor. The first exam had almost nothing to do with his lectures and relied solely on obscure information from the textbook. Get used to it. He's a hard marker. That's fine. It isn't his job to babysit. It is, however, his job to realize that we are not all interested in "achieving" a PHD in History.

4.0
4.0
HIST250
Apr 26, 2010

Hannant is a solid teacher. You better be willing to put in your time if you want a possible A. People are sometimes put off by him, but he is an excellent professor in theory. Not everyone will find his teaching style preferable, luckily he is a nice guy and will totally help you out if you just ask!

3.0
5.0
HIST106
Oct 15, 2010

Larry knows his stuff, that much is for sure. Other than that, his teaching is terrible. An extremely hard marker for first year courses, and speakers during his mandatory discussions are not encouraged. Opinionated and probably turning more students off history than onto it, I do not recommend Larry as a teacher.

4.0
3.0
HIST250
Apr 14, 2011

For a class I expected to be very interesting, it wasn't. His lectures are very dry, is a hard marker, and the mandatory discussions are a pain. However,he is very helpful and fair when approached with problems.

5.0
4.0
HIST110
Jun 27, 2011

Larry was often very humourous during lectures, making light of rather grim situtions that were being discussed. The course content was a little dry, although many dark avenues of Canadian history are visited. I hated Canadian History before this course, now I am very interested. Larry is a hard marker aswell.

3.0
4.0
AA
Dec 29, 2011

I read the comments before registering for his class and thought"I can do this, it can't be that hard"...but it was. However, I am pleased to have finished a course with a real professor. He knows his stuff, expects his students to know it too. He respects others opinions and demands the same. If you're willing to work, u'll get a good mark.

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Jan 26, 2012

I was really interested in the topics to be covered in this class so I quickly signed up. However, every lecture I was dreadfully bored. Larry clearly knew the material really well, I was just not interested in the way he presented it.

2.0
5.0
HISTHIST
Feb 17, 2012

Not good for first year, better for advanced. We had 200 pages to read over 5 weeks. No vocabulary was reviewed and I was discouraged to ask. I was very excited and eager for this class but was quickly overwhelmed. The text was excellent, assigned readings were difficult. If you want to bring down your GPA, this is a good place to s

3.0
5.0
HIST145
Mar 31, 2012

Yes, the classes are challenging. Yes, you will read a lot. Yes, you will be held to a high standard. You may dislike that because most of the other instructors at Kindermosun will not treat you like a functioning adult. Plans to go on and do well at university? Get prepared by taking a class (or two) with Hannant.

5.0
4.0
HIST106
May 31, 2012

Larry is a real Prof, enough said.He expects you to listen, attend and do all the readings. If you show interest, he will show interest in you but don't expect him to babysit.Seminar is big so make sure you do your readings and pipe up when you have an opinion,he loves this. He will open your eyes, so don't expect any history channel lessons.

3.0
4.0
HIST106
Jun 7, 2012

Larry is a nice guy, but his lectures could sometimes verge on unbearable. Attendance not mandatory. I definitely would say I had to learn from the text on this one.The discussions were interesting but he is a hard marker + discussion content can be very difficult to read! If you study you should do okay but you'll be mainly learning on your own.

2.0
4.0
HIST100
Jul 25, 2012

Such a boring class. I was so interested in this subject until the class started. All he gave was the facts, such as dates and places, but no real substance that you couldn't learn from reading a textbook. If you're going to take this class, be able to take fast notes in lecture, and make sure you attend and participate in the discussion.

1.0
4.0
HIST104
Oct 24, 2012

Spoke in monotone. Hard to pay attention.

4.0
2.0
HIST104
Dec 21, 2012

Hannant is pretty cool and an Author to say the least... With an award. This man knows his stuff. Still lookin good for a guy of about 60 and has such a smooth voice.

4.0
4.0
HIST106108
Apr 8, 2013

Larry is an incredibly intelligent man who knows history of the 20th century inside out. He is insightful and while at some points a bit dry his lectures are extremely informative.You wont have to read the textbook unless you miss a class. As long as you participate in the discussions and think outside the box you'll do great.

4.0
3.0
HIST104
Apr 17, 2013

Larry is a really cool guy. He is not necessarily the easiest or most approachable of professors, but I loved my class with him. The reviews here had me worried about my class with him, but I really enjoyed it. If you are willing to work hard and put in effort, you will do well in Larry's class. I would absolutely take another class with him.

5.0
3.0
HIST108
Grade: B
Jan 10, 2014

Dr. Hannant is hands down my favourite professor ever. The man possesses such an insight into history and the human condition that I consider it a great privilege to have taken 3 of his courses.

4.0
2.0
HIST250
Apr 10, 2014

His lectures can be a bit dry if you aren't listening, but he REALLY knows his stuff. If you put effort into the material, he is happy to go out of his way to help you. A really good professor as long as you are interested in the material.

5.0
1.0
HIST106
Grade: A
Jun 3, 2014

If you're shy, he comes across as unapproachable, but if you actually talk to him, he is really helpful and knows his stuff! Great teacher. Had him in 3 classes. Would totally take another class of his any day.

5.0
4.0
HIST108
Aug 29, 2014

Dr. Hannant is such an intelligent and wonderful professor. I learned a lot from his class. Highly recommend for anyone who wants to be ready for upper level University years. His lecture will open your eyes and guide you to think outside the box.

4.0
4.0
HIST108
Oct 9, 2014

Larry is a great prof. His lectures aren't super lively, but he knows the material extremely well and will answer any question thrown his way. I've taken a few classes with seminars and I found Larry's to be the most rewarding, but don't expect to get a decent grade in the seminars without doing the reading and participating. He's a good guy.

4.0
3.0
250
Dec 5, 2014

Larry is an excellent teacher. He is incredibly knowledge and passionate about history. His seminars are done in a round table format, and you will be graded on your participation. However, Larry wont grade you harshly for incorrect answers or contributions. Simply being willing to contribute is sufficient for a good grade. An excellent prof.

5.0
4.0
HIST106
Jan 14, 2015

Professor Hannant is an amazing teacher. He helped perk my interest in history and prepare me to go on to the history program at the University of Toronto. He covers the material clearly and thoroughly while making classes interesting. You will have to work for your grade, but will take so much more from it as a result.

3.0
4.0
108
Feb 17, 2015

Larry is extremely knowledgable, but his lectures are quite dull and hard to follow, as he delivers information in a story-like fashion. Make sure you do all the assigned readings from the textbook and articles; his exams are tough and based off this material. Good luck.

4.0
3.0
HIST104001
Grade: A-
Jun 9, 2015

Witty, classy and inspiring. I personally loved his lectures, and the way he uses humour to illustrate the history. I enjoyed all of the assignments, and the format for his tests. Careful when writing the papers to stay on point as the relatively small number of words allowed doesn't leave much room for anecdotes or straying from the criteria.

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
B (2)
Rather_Not_Say (1)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(2)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 5 reported grades
B: 2
Rather_Not_Say: 1
A: 1
A-: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.42 avg change
Aug
Oct
Dec
Jan
Feb
Jun
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

106

5.0

(1)

11210120

5.0

(1)

HIST304

5.0

(1)

H1122022

5.0

(1)

HST1060822

5.0

(1)
+31 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HISTORY108

5.0

HIST232

5.0

HISTHIST

5.0

HIST145

5.0

HIST235

4.3

Similar Professors