2.4
Quality3.9
Difficulty28%
Would Retake101
Reviews28%
Would Retake
101
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
13
4
14
3
18
2
18
1
38
What Students Say
“This professor ruined my first semester at college”
110A - 2.0 rating“Useless, will tank your grade”
BSCI1510 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
26%
Textbook Required
33%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.46 avg changeRatings by Course
BSCI201
4.0
(3)110A
3.5
(2)BSCI110
3.0
(4)INTROBIO
3.0
(1)BSCI1510
2.6
(58)Difficulty by Course
BSCI111A
5.0
BIO110A
5.0
CELLBIO
4.1
BSCIBSCI
4.0
BSCI110A
4.0
Reviews (101)
When I had him for Cell Biology, he was really good and well organized. Definately one of the better Biology/Molecular Biology profs.
Lectures are a waste of time. The last third of the semester I never attended, and still made an A. THe class is worthless.
Great Lectures, Very helpful fair tests
His lectures are well-organized and exhaustive. They go into "nauseating detail." I liked his exams, too, because they were short answer. My only caveat with him is that he isn't very approachable because he is very curt and gets angry.
Def. One of the best profs i have had at vanderbilt and has a good sense of humor,well organized good detail and gives a good basis for cell bio
His lectures are interesting, and he teaches the meaterial in an effective manner. His tests can be something of a curveball. You have to be ready for any type of question. Fairly difficult, but a decent professor. Doesn't use the board enough.
Excellent Professor. Very organized and explains things well. For those who think he's not approachable, they're mistaken! Very helpful outside of class. He's from NY; so he has the cool NY attitude.
He is not a very good teacher. His lectures are rambling and he often does not know what he is talking about and makes mistakes during the lecture. His exams are not well worded but not to hard.
He's a nice guy but he's not the best lecturer. he rambles and loves using elevated language when it doesn't make him more articulate. his tests are easy, but that only means there is practically NO CURVE. his lecture slides are ill-organized he's kind of lazy. he tends to scramble the order of stuff from the textbook
interesting sounding, super unorganized lectures, very hard to get straight when studying for. decently hard tests, gave one the day after thanksgiving break. said he was going to make tests from the slides, but then said he took the test directly from the suggested exam from the textbook. lazy. hard.
he mumbles constantly. He uses way too big of words that really mean nothing at all. Hard to understand. Took this section cause i liked brodie. unorganized. Don't take him unless you have to.
An arrogant man, who acts like his students should automatically understand the material. Difficult tests that have nothing to do with his notes, and although he says less is more for the short answers, you'll get counted off.
Zwiebel is an arrogant SOB who has unclear lectures, disorganized powerpoints, and tests with very easy multiple choice questions but free response questions that have nothing to do with the class. Don't hand in anything for a regrade either, b/c he will just take off points: The average on our test dropped from 81 to 78 after the regrade. Avoid!
Awful professor. Awful to his students and tests are unrelated to material. Give me Broadie back!
Very unorganized. He jumps around his powerpoint slides alot. Attending lecture is not necessary because his tests will be over both reading material and lecture material. Reading the book will cover everything that you missed in lecture. His MC questions are word for word from the book.
Zwiebel is without a doubt the worst professor I have had at Vanderbilt. His powerpoint slides are disorganized and he doesn't give a crap about teaching. Broadie is the only reason why I'm doing well at all in the class. And the tests have little to do with the material. Zwiebel is just a lazy ass in general and should not be allowed to teach!
Downright awful professor. Take either of the two other sections (Graham/Patton is supposedly the best) b/c Zwiebel is not a good lecturer and gives poorly written tests that he wrote while **** (no joke...he told us this). And this is coming from someone who got an A in his class! I did like Broadie though for the first half.
Awful. If I am going to spend days and days studying for your tests, I would appreciate a well written test that tests by understanding versus one while written when we was ****. If students put in the time to study so much, they expect to be properly evaluated. I didn't even take one of his tests the material was so unorganized. I love Broadie.
Extremely unorganized; his slides rarely match up with what is posted online. Tests are extremely unfair and poorly written; he's usually **** when he writes them (he told us this). He goes over stuff in nauseating detail but then tests over the small parts he only spent a couple seconds on. Also, he says the word "essentially" way too much.
He was pretty unorganized but a decent lecturer with the concepts. Pretty intimidating and can be condescending. Tests were completely random, easy MC but hard essays that were graded poorly. His half of the final was extremely difficult and a little ridiculous. Alright professor
A tad unapproachable and tests are unclear. They aren't as detailed as Broadie's but they're confusing. Zwiebel's a decent professor, but taking this section would cause you a lot of unnecessary stress. The Graham/Patton section is supposed to be easiest. And Stubbs is supposed to be extremely brilliant and straightforward. Take one of those.
His teaching style is much more like telling a story than Broadie's scientific approach, and I don't think I liked it. He's definitely funnier and more interesting, but for Biology purposes, his methods are difficult. His part of the final was ridiculous as well, which I didn't see coming. Very nice, but very difficult.
Zwiebel is probably the best professor I've had so far. He's extremely clear during lectures, telling you exactly what to and not to study. He's also very flexible in his office hours and responds quickly to emails. His tests are extremely fair and significantly easier than Broadie's. Take him if possible!!!
Zwiebel's half of 110A was the tougher portion for me; he reintroduced MC questions but focused on tiny details. There is supposed to be a generous curve but, as it turned out, it didn't help me. I had an 83 average after dropping a test and ended up with a B.
This professor ruined my first semester at college. He is extremely unclear, and his lectures are incredibly dull. He overcomplicates every subject. His tests are outrageous. You get marked wrong for writing the right answer using different words. Take another professor if at all possible! Save your sanity!!!!!
Not gonna lie, really tough class. Slightly better than the first half, but that's not saying much. Concepts can be confusing. I suggest meeting with the teacher very early just to introduce yourself for later on. Read BEFORE class. Makes things alot easier when it comes time for his god-awful tests. On the bright side he's pretty funny.
Didn't enjoy his half as much as Broadie's, mainly because he's not as clear with his lectures. Tests were harder to predict because he had mc, but overall weren't any worse than Broadies exams. Overall decent professor.
Zwiebel was an okay lecturer (and it helped that I was more familiar with his material than Broadie's) but he would interrupt his lectures to call out people sleeping and wouldn't let his lectures be recorded. His tests were easier than Broadie's.
Out of the 4 bio profs I have had so far, Zwiebel was my least favorite. His lecture slides have many pictures with few words so if you dont go to class you wont understand the slides at all. He can be rude in class and in office hours. Tests are MC and Short answer. Go over slides before class, TAKE EXCELLENT NOTES, and MEMORIZE ALL OF THE SLIDES!
easy tests but this guy does not care at all about teaching and it shows. he is very paternalistic
Lectures can be very long and boring but since his powerpoint slides have next to nothing on them you are forced to listen (something he tells you the first class when he also says you can't record lectures), and while he tries to be funny he is not always successful.
Broadie is definitely the better half of the lecture pair, but Zwiebel isn't bad. He's not the best lecturer, but the tests are much easier than Broadie's and there are MC. His powerpoints aren't very clear and have a lot of pictures without words, so it helped to read for Zwiebel's tests, where on Broadie's I just memorized the lecture slides.
Dr. Zwiebel's lecture's were not as clear as Dr. Broadie's (they switch over halfway through the semester), but his tests were much much clearer and easier to pass. Dr. Zwiebel is a very understanding, down-to-earth professor, and he is willing to go out of his way to help you understand the material.
His tests were MUCH more difficult to study for than Broadie's. None of his short answer or MC questions make grammatical sense but he refuses to provide useful answers about what his questions are even asking. Avoid at all costs. Useless, will tank your grade
Zwiebel was significantly harder to follow during his lectures than Brodie was. He can be blunt with you in office hours. His tests, while some multiple choice, were much harder to understand and to prepare for than Brodie's were.
In my opinion, Zwiebel's lectures weren't as bad as I expected. However, he is an awfully rude person. He treats students like caged animals during exams. Moreover, his exams were unnecessarily difficult and filled with awfully worded questions and mistakes. The curve for this class is harsh. He made me hate biology. Avoid him.
Rude. Disrespectful. No sense of organization. Horrible lectures. Makes lots of key mistakes and says wrong and contradictory things often. I personally thought Broadie's tests were easier because the frqs were directly from the lectures. His half of the final was so poorly written it was sad how little effort he puts into this class
The class is difficult, but if you show up to class, review the lecture slides for 30 min to 1 hour a day, reach out to Zwiebel if you have questions, and attend Zwiebel's weekly review sessions, you should do fine. Zwiebel is an okay lecturer, but he is willing to work with students to help them succeed. Overall, I enjoyed his class.
Not that great of a teacher. Broadie was way better. Tests were a lot easier than Broadie's half though. Kind of mean to students.
Zwiebel is not at all accessible, and is often very intimidating. Asking a question takes a lot of courage because of his mannerisms. His tests are horribly structured, and draws from a small portion of the textbook. He also barely knows what he is talking about-don't expect him to be able to answer any questions. Boring lectures, horrible slides.
Zwiebel does not write that much on his slides so you need to go to class to understand what will be on the tests. The tests range from really easy to absurdly difficult so be sure to know as much as you can about the course. You will learn a lot, but he is not as focused as Broadie.
Zwiebel is rude to students both in class and during office hours, and as such came across as very unapproachable throughout the semester. I would avoid taking him if possible.
Not the best lecturer, hopefully you did well on Broadies tests so you still have a drop
He literally told the class one day that he tried to make the exam fun by making it challenging. His class is doable, but really tough. Don't cram for his class because it won't work. He puts a lot of information into one lecture, so by the time the exam comes it's a lot to study. Exams ask you to apply concepts, so you better know your stuff.
His class is a lot of work! Different from Broadie, his lectures require you to not only read the textbook but also rearrange and rework his slides because they are so disorganized. He did make an effort to improve this class by changing the testing styles. However, I would still try my best to avoid him.
Avoid taking his class. He has absolutely no regard for his students . His lectures are terribly unorganized. He is also cold during class and outside of it. Going to his office hours is just not worth the disrespect from him. You have to read the textbook to succeed and success on his exams is hard because of how poorly written they are.
Zwiebel gets a lot of hate but honestly his lectures were pretty easy to follow and he explained things well (maybe a few tangents), and his tests focus on you understanding the processes and concepts as opposed to Broadie's memorization heavy tests. If you pay attention in class you should be fine, he answers questions well too imo. Nice guy!
He don't teach class in person and his tests are super hard. He coughs during his lecture recordings. He has 10 hours of lecture recordings per test. He is super tough. Avoid Zwiebel AT ALL COSTS.
The worst professor I have ever had. Unclear in recorded lectures that are far too long but refuses to fix them or even edit out the parts where he coughs for 10 seconds straight. Makes students uncomfortable asking questions. Unclear exams, harsh grading policies with literally no partial credit. Sank my grade 8 points from the first prof. AVOID!!
An absolute terrible professor and person
Just not a good professor. His lectures are poorly organized and overall bad. He doesn't care about the success of his students at all. It's rather sad because the first half with Dr. Bordenstein was good, but avoid Zwiebel at all costs.
This guy is the worst professor possible. He cannot form sentences without going uh uh uh every couple words. He does not care at all about students.
Zwiebel does not care for his students and his lectures are very disorganized. Avoid Zwiebel at all costs.
Genuinely one of the worst educators I've ever had. Unclear about what he wants us to know for the test and just awful at presenting information in a way that's interesting or easy to understand. It doesn't help that his lectures are so disorganized and that he often makes mistakes while talking or on the slides.
The worst lecturer and often conveys material in a confusing manner. He does not provide background information, and often brings up terms without explaining. He listens to someplace for student learning rather than the actual students. He does not actually teach in class. I basically taught myself for his course
As you can see, all the ratings from Fall 2021 have been harsh. Context: we switched professors midway as did the teaching style (traditional to the flipped classroom). The flipped classroom made it much harder to stay on top of classwork and I agree it sucks. He does like it, so it might stay. IF! you were prepped for Q&A, his lectures were great.
Even with in-person class, Zwiebel did a mostly virtual teaching format with classes being just Q&A sessions. We had to read the new textbook and listen to his pre-recorded ppt lectures. Overall it was just really difficult to learn anything for the class unless you did everything by yourself at home.
I think professor Zwiebel gets more hate than he should. The class is less pure memorization than the first half, but this does mean you have to understand the concepts well. He says that you need to read the textbook, but if you review the slides enough you should be fine without it. Active recall is probably the best way to study for this course.
Professor Zwiebel is extremely intelligent and undoubtedly very accomplished. With that in mind, he wasn't the greatest teacher. He used recycled lectures from (I'm guessing) fall 2020 and there didn't seem to be much effort to ensure that the class was actually learning. Overall, he just didn't seem enthusiastic to be teaching us bio
I felt bad about his rate my professor so I thought I'd give him a good rating.
Professor Z was good as long as you learn the lectures. He recommends reading the textbook. The quizzes and tests are more straightforward than Broadie's. All tests are take-home, but know the material well as if you were not going to use notes on the tests.
The class is difficult but Zwiebel makes it feel a lot better. His lectures are comprehendible and quizzes/exams test less on pure memorization and more on understanding concepts which I prefer. He's also very considerate of his students and genuinely cares about us. The test average is also much higher than Broadie's were which is nice.
Zwiebel gets a bad rep but he's really not that bad. Im doing better with Zwiebel than I did with Broadie. He's funny and as long as you watch the lectures you'll be fine.
Learn the lectures.
You will be pushed out of your comfort zone, but he is there to help you. He hosted a Q+A on his own time before every midterm/final. MUST read textbook (often test Q's will have direct wording from it) + watch lectures. Test Q's are written very clearly. It takes about 10 hr/wk to do well comfortably, (3x2hr lectures, 4 hr for reading textbook).
Zweibel was the easier half of the course. Exam and quiz averages go from high 60s and low 70s to mid 80s. Zweibel's lectures are slower paced but longer than Broadie's. Zweibel definitely cares about his students, and he gives out tips on how to succeed in his section of the course. All exams are take-home and online but definitely study for exams
Professor Zwiebel cares about his students and their success. He hosted review days outside of class, was available for questions over email or in person, and made fair exam/quiz questions that didn't try to trick you. Sure, he can be strict but that is overrided by now he is a nice guy and passionate biology professor.
Similarly to Broadie, Zwiebel is knowledgeable but has trouble communicating content to students. His tests convered obscure details and expected us to make weird logic jumps. Ultimately, the class tested our ability to navigate slides and find obscure details rather than enhancing our bio knowledge. My tip is to be highly familiar with the slides.
Has quizzes over the entire week on Fridays. Fridays also happen to be held on Zoom. Lecture slides are very slow and he says "uh" A LOT. Slides are a little less organized than Broadie's but the content is simpler.
I agree that Zwiebel is funny but I see reviews from 1 year ago claiming he is amazing and I don't get that. His lectures are so confusing and he talks slow and I just see students with other professors learning and understanding concepts while people in my class don't. The way his class is structured just doesn't foster learning as much as others.
Flipped classroom, knowledgeable as Broadie. Try to stay engaged, but I found it class easier with Zwiebel. He would try to make jokes, which was a nice contrast between Broadie. But still, the class was as difficult. Definitely come to the lecture with questions to avoid long moments of awkward silence.
I like Zwiebel a lot but I don't appreciate how everyone can just ChatGPT each question on each assessment and make >90% as it's not restricted by the professor to use AI tools. Finding out that using AI can get you good grades without studying at the END of the semester really sucks when everyone else who used ChatGPT has an A+ and you have a B.
Very boring lectures -- he just reads off the slides and does not provide any extra information that the slides don't have. I stopped playing the audio recordings on each slide, and I got the same amount of information that I would've gotten if I spent an extra 3 mins on each slide listening to the recordings. He has easier test questions though.
Zwiebel is an underrated professor. Easily the best Biology professor I have had at my time at Vanderbilt. He really tries to make his lectures engaging and does a great job of explaining confusing concepts.
I don't understand why Zwiebel has such bad ratings. He may not be the best out there, but his exams much easier than Broadie's. It also changed from a flipped lecture to a "hybrid" one for his section, which was a big improvement. As for his lecture style, it's really not bad and I like that he uses a lot of analogies to explain hard concepts.
avoid at all cost
Way better than Broadie. Polled us on what format of class we wanted and changed to regular lectures twice a week instead of all flipped. Good at lecturing, engaging, and his test questions are easier. Still very in-depth material for an intro class. Online, open-internet tests but probably changing to paper next year because averages were too high
Hybrid style: Prof. Zwiebel is great and funny lecturer but the recorded lectures are not as well organized. His tests are obviously not tailored to the online, open-note format given the astronomically high averages. Was frustrating seeing classmates use AI and collaborate openly at the library. Focuses on general concepts over minute detail.
Dr. Zwiebel is a great lecturer and a sweet person in general. He really takes the time to help you understand the material during class. Compared to the first half with Dr. Broadie, his half has a much lighter workload and the exams are more straightforward. Definitely recommend!
Dr. Zwiebel's half of the course is easier than Dr. Broadie's, however, the open note exams encourages students to use ChatGPT. Those that do not cheat are punished since there is no curve due to the extremely high class averages on exams. I learned a lot from this class, but it is frustrating to receive a lower grade for choosing honesty.
Worst professor I've had at Vanderbilt. 90k a year for a flipped classroom with no in-person lectures. I learned nothing from his boring videos. The exams were also take-home, so everyone cheated, and there was no curve. Therefore, you were punished for being honest.
he's knows alot and lectures well but I cannot get over the fact that he condoned cheating...like if your class has an average of 92 every test (with numerous people getting the same exact grade)you as a professor should look into why.
Dr. Zwiebel's half of the semester was significantly better than Broadie's. His quiz/exam questions made more sense and were easier to answer. The only downside is that the class is so used to cheating in Broadie's section that they continue to cheat in this half and inflate the class average.
Worst professor ever, do not even think about being honest on his exams because you will just fail everything. You NEED TO CHEAT. YOU WILL NOT SURVIVE OTHERWISE. He is not doing anything about it. Just treat AI subscriptions as your textbook cost and use it on all his exams. IF YOU DON'T PURCHASE AN AI, YOU WILL NOT DO WELL.
Had him for the 2nd portion of cell bio, the most discouraging, mean, bad-temepered prof I've encountered. Unclear instructions on exams, very picky grader and tends to go on tangents in class about things that don't really matter. Gives sassy, mean remarks when students ask questions and point out unfairness. Extremely hard to approach
Dr. Z does not care about you as a student, and he will say that to your face. His tests are significantly harder and not as fair as Graham's. Will be snarky and rude to students if they ask questions, and will randomly call people out in class for "talking" and humiliate them for no reason. Sadly, he is the only option for cell bio. Don't take.
As a senior, I've never even imagined a professor could be horrible as this! He sees students as enemies. He takes pride in the class average for the exam being low, as if seeing us fare badly is enjoyable to him. Exams are absurd. He expects answers that he didn't even ask! With utmost sincerity, I suggest he resign from his teaching role.
Quite frankly I do not know where the few high ratings come from. Avoid him if you can. Cell bio was not taught by him last year, so take when it's not him!!!!
Absolutely horrible professor. His first time teaching cell bio and clearly he knew nothing. Always sassy and rude to students, refuses to host regular office hours and generally hates teaching. Enjoys making students lives miserable. tests are incredibly hard and specific. Barley gives out partial credit.
This man is NOT joking when he says he has Zoom OH bc ppl cry less (i cried after OH w him). The internet, any smart friends you've made first half of the sem, and chat will be your saviors for this portion. Ppl say he's the easier section but I was so mentally destroyed after OH with him it felt much harder for me and made me drop my bio major
Zwiebel translated from German to English means onion, which perfectly describes him. Hard, dry, and cold on the outside. Like biting into a raw onion, he is pungent, bitter, and makes you want to cry on the inside. He genuinely doesn't care about students (he says so himself), doesn't host regular office hours, and is mediocre at best at lecturing
Dr. Zwiebel talks about something in class for literally 1 minute, has a single sentence about it in his lecture slides and writes 10-point frqs about it, plus 2-3 multiple choices. Super unpredictable exams, his lectures are fine and he's generally a funny person, but completely unfair in his exams.
His tests aren't impossible by any means, but they aren't at all reflective of his presentation of the material. He seems like he genuinely just dislikes undergrads and becomes hostile out of nowhere for no real reason (i.e. yelling at students, getting offended by questions). Massive opp.
Engaging lecturer; he doesn't prioritize bulk memorization and prefers a deep understanding of ideas. Exams at times have questions that are not intuitive at all, but he takes 20 mins after each exam to discuss any questions that students thought were unfair - he drops these questions and adds points to exams based on student feedback which is nice
His first year teaching this class and it's obvious that he just took the last professor's slides. Contradicts himself constantly. He says to "learn not memorize". He's lying. The only way too do well is to know everything on the slides. Even so, there were still multiple questions on his exams completely unrelated to anything we had discussed.
His teaching does not reflect what he puts on the exams. He acts like he does not care for memorization, but will then ask specifics that are not even mentioned in the slides. Also has attitude with students for merely asking questions, not allowing for him to be approachable. The worst professor I have had in the bio department
I came to Vanderbilt thinking that they would have professors of a higher quality and professors who taught better than those at other universities. Unfortunately, it appears that I was sorely mistaken. I'm glad that I will be transferring to another college to finish the rest of my undergraduate education.
I know someone who lost Summa Cum Laude because of his Cell Bio class, and I thought maybe I'd be up for the challenge of getting above a B in his notoriously hard class. I was MISTAKEN. Now the GPA that I toiled so hard for is ruined. Perhaps I should've spent 25 hours a week in his office and never slept if I really wanted that A so bad.
If you need to take BSCI1510, take it with literally any other professor. All of his exam content comes from the textbook, with maybe a few things from his slides here and there. The exam averages are VERY LOW, usually around a 60, so if you feel comfortable with that, go right ahead. Overall, nice guy but a very tough grader and a very hard class.
Made me cry in office hours. AT ALL COSTS DO NOT TAKE WITH THESE PROFESSORS. Grade based only on 4 exams + a final with the lowest being dropped. BE PREPARED TO FAIL. Lowest test average= 52 and highest= 63. The lecture slides are extremely dense and it is impossible to know what tiny little detail material you will be tested on from the slides.
Laurence Zwiebel is not a nice man. Empathy, care, and decent human compassion have never touched his sad black little heart once in his life. Expect absurd tests with averages in the 60s and little to no help from his part. Instead of self reflecting on why we are doing so poorly he instead deflects the blame onto us and assumes we must be morons.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
26%
Textbook Required
33%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.46 avg changeRatings by Course
BSCI201
4.0
(3)110A
3.5
(2)BSCI110
3.0
(4)INTROBIO
3.0
(1)BSCI1510
2.6
(58)Difficulty by Course
BSCI111A
5.0
BIO110A
5.0
CELLBIO
4.1
BSCIBSCI
4.0
BSCI110A
4.0