His lectures are convoluted at best and often tangential. I did not meet a single person in this class who could reliably follow what he was talking about, this man made simple concepts far more complex than necessary. If you're willing to pay a few thousand dollars to watch a mildly funny comedian and teach yourself math then take this class.

Professor Rozansky is a really nice person, which makes it really hard to understand why he torments his students so much. His lectures are impossible to follow, even if you already understand the material. He is unreachable by email, doesn't go to his office hours, and doesn't tell you your grade is because he curves the final grade.

Doesnt answer emails, doesnt answer questions for tests or class info clearly, test are on examples from class that cant be found in the book, told class that initiative is punishable, long homework doesnt apply to tests, use proofs and theory and less actual examples. I liked and understood calc in 231 &232

Ok he is funny and brilliant with theoretical math. With that out of the way probably the worst teacher Ive ever had in my life, particularly in the virtual setting. Lectures are proofs, incoherent examples, gave us 18 SA problems in a 50 min test. Wont curve our midterms until after finals, mean on tests in the mid 50s, avoid this guy for calc!

AVOID LEV AT ALL COSTS. I went to the first week of lecture and havent gone since. His exams are crazy long so Im still barely passing, and I got an A- in Calc 1. There are only two exams and the final, and the mean of these exams were a 50 and 55. Top 20% of grades get As, next 30% get Bs, and the rest pray. Who can write the fastest?

While you can tell he has an exceptional skill for math, he is one of the worst professors I have ever had. We had to beg him to add homework as a percentage of our final grade, our tests are 15+ questions in 50 minutes, and the averages on exams are 50 and 55. Lectures often make no sense, and only around 20 of 80 students attend. Avoid for calc.

Professor Rozansky is not good at explaining math concepts because he is too smart for his own good. He also moves very fast and his lectures are rather boring. Tests are worth 85% of the grade and the averages on all of them are always below 60. Do not take him unless you are naturally gifted at math (or just at all)!

Rozansky went out of his way to make the semester more difficult for his students. MATH232 is a sequenced course and Rozansky chose to teach material which other students in different sections werent required to learn, and requested from the math department that we take a different final than the other students so he could test us on that material

Do not take this professor unless it is your last resort. This is one of those classes where you basically have to teach yourself everything using Khan Academy and YouTube videos to have a chance at passing. The other negative reviews aren't just salty about low grades; everyone worked their butts off only to get a class average of below 60!

Prof is not a coherent lecturer and is not accessible outside of class. If you're taking this just for the credit, you might not get it. If you need to learn Calc 2 for higher level math, you won't learn it efficiently with him. After all the work our class put in, all that most of us got was an unreasonably low grade and unnecessary stress.

Do not take this class if you actually want to learn math. Lectures were incoherent and mainly proof-based, no application to what the test would cover. I could barely follow along with the lectures, and taught the whole class to myself using outside resources. If you need this credit, take it with another professor or online.

Explains the material as if we are grad students reviewing material, and is EXTREMELY theory based. His methods of teaching only include lecturing. He encourages participation but will raise his voice at you if you get the answer wrong or ask questions that he thinks are stupid. Both midterms had class average of around 45 or 50%.

Rozansky is an incredibly hilariously nice professor, but he is horrible for actually teaching you the information. He only writes theorems and explain the history behind the formulas, but rarely shows any math using what he teaches. Most of the people who were doing well in class had to teach themselves the subject through videos and the textbook.

He's a funny lecturer I'll give him that, but his lectures are very theoretical, and he expects you to know a lot coming into this class. This is a VERY exam-heavy class (finals weighed 50%). The exams are straightforward, but you would have to teach yourself everything. I did fine until I couldn't teach myself the last unit and bombed the final.

Math232 is a very difficult class and Professor Rozansky does not make it easy. His lectures can be vague at times and be a little hard to follow along. His exams are hard, take a long time to grade, and make up the majority of your final grade (85%). Professor Rozansky is also five late minutes late for most classes. A positive is that he's funny.

The lectures in this course were unnecessarily difficult to understand. I taught myself the whole course and he provided little to no assistance other than the poorly worded lectures. Homework was the only thing I used to teach myself the course. Exams were extremely difficult, even with extensive preparation. Exam averages were in 40-50% range.

Professor Rozansky had good intentions, but it did not translate whatsoever to his lectures. He clearly understands the material, but does not know how to explain it. His lectures are extremely poorly worded and I taught myself the entire curriculum. Exam averages were below 50%. I would not recommend taking this course with Professor Rozansky.

His lectures were SO confusing (like seriously) and I literally didn't learn a single thing attending class. I had to teach myself the entire class from the textbook, which fortunately was very clear and understandable. The reason he's a 2 instead of a 1 is that his exams were almost the same as the HW problems he would give.

Lev is clearly an gifted mathematician, but he just cannot run a classroom. Exams resemble the practice problems but we never received answer keys to the midterms so we couldn't review or determine if we needed a regrade. Gave very few practice problems, and had a TA proctor a midterm for him who was late and he himself was late to the final exam.

Lectures are horrible, material is way overcomplicated and extremely theoretical while exams and homework are applications. Just learn on your own by watching other professors on YouTube. Exams are difficult as there aren't many questions, mess up one question and you're at a 75%. Entire grade is based off exams as well.

He doesn't clearly give guidelines about what will be on the test and his lectures and homeworks are on two completely different things. Also, he is hard to access outside of class and often struggles with technology making it hard to keep track of what's happening and he has SUCH BAD handwriting.

Take Calc 1 with anybody other than him. Lev has two tests and you cannot drop or replace either (unlike other Calc 1 teachers). Questions on his test will be something entirely different than lecture or homework. Avoid.

Lev is a very smart mathmetician, but he lacks effective communication with the students. He is often confusing in his lectures as he skips steps and expects you to understand terms that he has not yet defined. His tests are not overly difficult, but they are short and if you get one question wrong it drastically drops your grade.

Lev shows up late on midterm days, his exams are only 5ish questions long, doesn't really give partial credit, references the online textbook during class because he has no lesson plan, his syllabus is barely a page long with practically no info, didn't give a five day warning before an exam, AND HAD HOMEWORK DUE THANKSGIVING DAY DURING BREAK.

To whoever this may concern, I would rather swim with man-eating sharks than take this class again. Do not take this class if do not have experience. It will feel so hopeless that you would want to choke on your own intestines. Exams: 5 questions. No mic. Never tells you grades. Teaches at a high level. Skips steps. Pray if you get him RIP

He is a good person but please do not take his class. Though he's passionate about the subjects the lectures are poorly structured and very difficult to understand. Exams are extraordinarily hard and worth basically the entire grade. A "decent" level of understanding that could get you a B+ with another professor may not even let you pass with him.

He is a chill professor, very understand for student and somewhat easy grader. He aslo record lecture. However his class is very unorganized. Syllabus doesnt include the grading percentage of exams, hw, etc. He didnt post grade for a whole semester and never reply to email.

Professor held a zoom class during the August lockdown. Do not take this class.

I took AP Calc in high school and still did awful. 40/50 is the average for midterms (he doesn't curve). He does not explain anything well, insulted my friend's intelligence, and conducts the class different from all other 231 classes. I didn't listen to his reviews, but please for your mental sake take this class with anyone else.

Man I know so many people who took AP Calc and did fine, this man complicates things for no good reason. I'm a good student, but once you do poorly on one test its over. He is rude to students, and assigns four times the amount of hw as other profs. Our syllabus said ~86% of our grade was tests, at the end he threw out the 14% and it was only tests

If you have no previous exposure to calc, do NOT take him. Even if you have previous exposure to calc, I would still take almost any other professor before taking him again. His lectures are unorganized and he speaks in theoreticals. This class was genuinely miserable. I had to teach myself all of the material. 100% of the grade was exams. Avoid.

I enjoyed Professor Rozansky's enthusiasm but lectures were very theoretical. Difficult to understand. The class was essentially 100% test graded. Each midterm was 25%, and the final was 40-50%. Doesn't respond to emails, changed due dates and exam dates often. Don't recommend taking him. So much more difficult than the other 233 profs.

DO NOT TAKE! Grades are 25% midterm 1, 25% midterm 2, 50% final. Silly guy, but terrible teacher -- I did not learn anything in class. Not clear on grading, says he "may" curve but not up front about it. We didn't know what our grade is at ANY point, and still will not know what we have in the class until the grades are final.

The class is EXTREMELY DISORGANIZED. Syllabus is barebones and we have no idea what to expect. Homework was on Pearson and did not sync with class material. He's terrible at explaining concepts and uses unnecessarily difficult Math jargon without explaining it. The only things I learned form this course was from youtube and self-study.