3.2
Quality3.8
Difficulty55%
Would Retake194
Reviews55%
Would Retake
194
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
63
4
21
3
36
2
38
1
36
What Students Say
“(she makes me miserable everyday) :')”
BIO202 - 2.0 rating“[Insert function here]" "What a FUN question”
BIO252 - 3.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
74%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.85 avg changeRatings by Course
BIO105A2002
5.0
(1)BIO152
5.0
(1)BIO102
5.0
(1)BIO89
5.0
(1)BIOL490
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
BIOL252AND220
5.0
BIO202
4.2
BIO105A2002
4.0
BIO152
4.0
BIO102
4.0
Reviews (194)
Dr. Zwemer is certainly an enthusiastic professor and loves the subject, which was really awesome! She has a great personality and really cares about students. However, I did think many of her test questions were poorly designed/unnecessarily confusing, which was reflected in students' performance.
Dr. Zwemer is obviously enthusiastic about biology and enjoys teaching. My only complaint is that it became very obvious she did not proof-read her exams prior to administering them & during midterms she would have to correct the wording on at least 3 questions (which leads to confusion & poor performance by the class with midterms averaging 70s).
Dr. Zwemer is great person and knows Genetics well. However, the level of thinking used in lectures, homework, + sample exam questions are much different from her actual exams. There were typos in all 3 midterms and the final which caused confusion when taking the exam. Some of her questions are worded poorly. It's not impossible to do well though.
A lot of people studied very hard and had a good grasp of the material but still performed poorly in this class. I love genetics and am a Biology major, but this class really put me through it. Sample exam questions are not like the real exam questions at all. Dr. Z is a nice person, but I am personally disappointed in the grading system.
She was a really great teacher in class and explained things well. Only complaint is tests were unnecessarily hard and did not reflect how we learned in class. No study guides and nothing can prepare you for Type of questions on the exam
Dr. Z's homework, lectures and sample exam questions are much different from her actual exams. Many people study so hard in her class but still can't save our grades. No extra credits, no sample exams. Everyone is clear about the concepts but still not able to answer questions correctly. I was discouraged and it's just not impossible to do well
Honestly, I didnt do as well as I expected in her class, but it was because I wasn't putting in the work. Luckily I got to bring up my grade by the third test. The test are very dificult and you wont pass by studying the night before. However, shes very organized and test questions only come from what we talked about in class.
She was amazing- so kind and really cares about her students. It was a pretty hard class but she does as much as she can to help you out.
Dr Zwemer is the best professor Ive had. She genuinely cares about her students, and does everything she can to help them succeed. She makes class fun, engaging, and makes time for individual academic needs for each student. She resparked my love for genetics. Im so grateful to have had her!
Awesome professor who cares about students. Shes a tough grader, but makes sure she does all she can for her students.
Great professor. Wish I could take her for all my bio classes!
Very enthusiastic about teaching and genetics. Makes class fun. Would definitely take a class from her again
Dr. Zwemer is the best! She's so warm, caring, open, and definitely knows what she's talking about. She makes great effort to work with her students and makes assignments/tests fair. Would definitely take again.
Dr. Zwemer is the one of the kindest professors I've ever had. She genuinely cares about student success, is very accessible, and will give her all to help you. One of the best professors I've ever had the pleasure of learning from. Lectures are engaging and exciting, she's organized, and she isn't out to get you on exams. Genuinely loved her class
Dr. Zwemer was amazing in this switch to the online format. All of her lectures are recorded and easy to follow, and there are ample practice problems to work off of. It's really easy to do well if you pay attention and focus on what she tells you to focus on. Great human being and teacher.
Take her class! She is so caring and thoughtful and adapted to online class very well. She coveys biology super well! Her 3rd test kinda messed me up but thats on me so be warned. Her lectures were pre-recorded and recitation is truly not that much work compared to a lab which is worth the same 1 credit. TAKE ZWEMER! Love her so much!
Zwemer is probably one of the better bio professors, but she still isn't the greatest. Her exams are extremely random and poorly put together. For my class she two pretty decent exams and then made one of them WAAYY harder than the others with no warning. She's someone who MAKES her classes average to be around 70%, so beware.
Dr. Zwemer did a great job breaking down our lectures into smaller portions so that it was not so long of a video. The class was completely async besides group office hours held once a week on zoom. Participation points were able to be earned in many ways, and the exams were super fair. I loved the course material and Dr. Z.
Super convoluted class structure, the lectures were boring and incredibly topical. Professor seems excited about material but managed to make the class incredibly unengaging and downright off-putting at times.
Dr. Zwemer is one of the best bio professors I've had at UNC. She's caring, accessible, kind, and extremely passionate about the subject. Lectures are interesting, tests are easy if you prepare for them, and grading is fair. Pay attention to her lectures and you'll do great.
Zwemer made the class disorganized which ultimately confused me on requirements. Participation required posting to several different websites, and anything labeled "optional" would affect your grade if you did not attend. The test questions were misleading also.
Dr. Zwemer is passionate about what she teaches. I thought the class structure was fine. Her exams were fair at first. However, she made the last exam and final purposefully more difficult than the other exams, since the averages were high on the first two. This made me feel like she cares more about her reputation than the students.
Most of your grade is determined by tests, yet the tests are more about understanding the professor's state of mind more than understanding and stitching together biology concepts. When the goal is to train scientists to be creative and diverse, this format is problematic to say the least.
She is incredible. Her lectures albeit recorded were wonderful. She is very flexible and the course is designed to cater to various learning styles. She encourages participation. 100% would take again.
Dr. Zwemer is a caring person, however, she may go onto tangents which has nothing to do with the class. Never opened the book once, but if you watch her lectures then you will be set. Recitation is very straightforward. Tests are fair. Make sure to get those participation points (by attending OH and posting on piazza). Overall, not a bad professor
Dr. Zwemer is a very polite and passionate professor. Overall, she made the course content digestible and her lectures were engaging. For the most part, her exams were fair and she did her best to accommodate for her students. Dr. Zwemer is a solid choice for this class!!
I have mixed feelings after this semester. Zwemer is very understanding and thoughtful regarding the Covid circumstances, but her test questions were confusing and my grade dropped a letter after Exam 3. Based off of her fairly clear expectations outside of class, I would take her again.
Dr. Zwemer was a phenomenal professor. She took the course curriculum and related it to real life examples which kept students very captivated while simultaneously making difficult topics easier to understand. Her tests are a little difficult given that UNC likes application based exams, but this is expected from any BIOL 202 course. 10/10
Zwemer is a solid lecturer and explains tough concepts well, however this does not make up for the difficulty of exams. Exam questions were often difficult to understand and misleading and definitely nothing like the sample exam questions she posts. I liked Dr. Zwemer but personally I felt like her tests were unfair, especially the final
Dr. Zwemer is a great professor, and my favourite professor at UNC so far. This class is known for being challenging, however, she made very fun and easy to follow. You have to stay on top of your work to do well, as is expected. The group office hours that she holds were very helpful and she is very clear with what she expects us to learn.
Dr. Zwemer was the most accommodating professor I've had at UNC. She clearly loves her job and really cares about her students. She adjusted things to make sure we were doing okay. All test questions come from her lectures and she gives a reasonable about of lecture material each week. If you put in the work, you can get a good grade.
I LOVED Dr. Zwemer, even though her class was challenging. I love genetics which helped when learning the material, but her exams could be difficult. She prepared us well for the exams & worked hard to make sure that she was accessible to us (individual office hours). She made it clear in her efforts that she cared for us & wanted us to do well.
She is a very charming professor. She takes a challenging topic and makes it easy for students to learn. Her tests are quite difficult, but that's a UNC problem.
Dr. Zwemer has by far been the best STEM professor I have had at UNC! She is easily accessible in/out of the classroom for any questions you may have regarding the material or Genetics itself. The exams are not bad if you read the material, study her lectures, practice, go to the SI sessions, and understand her sample exam questions in notes.
Prof Zwemer was super accommodating with covid and the switch to online. She was so nice and genuinely cared about her students. I thought that she did a great job of teaching the material. The tests weren't easy but were definitely possible if you studied and put in the work for her class. The class was also taught asynchronously.
Dr. Zwemer is such an accommodating, sweet and patient soul, but lots of moving parts in her class! Her tests are quite application-based and creative. She is reasonable in her grading. There are a lot of reading and lecture content, but I did well by going through all of it & using her learning objectives. *pandemic class
One of the most accommodating professors I've ever had. Dr. Zwemer made all of our exams open note, open internet, etc. This class was incredibly interesting and a lot of fun, and I'm not even a bio major. Other profs should use Dr. Zwemer as a model of how to teach in a pandemic- she did an amazing job teaching virtually. TAKE HER!!!
Take her class! She's amazing.
Dr. Zwemer is a great lecturer and was very caring, flexible, and accommodating during this pandemic. Exams are tricky and can be difficult but that's fair given that they're all open note. Participation matters, but she ensures there are multiple ways and numerous chances to get full credit. One of the best STEM professors I've had at UNC so far.
She's the best professor I've had in UNC so far. She is extremely talented, energetic knowledgeable, funny and awesome. The content of the course is not easy and you still need to work to get a good grade. But the work you'll put in is minimal and you will probably pass without even lifting the book. Make sure you participate well and have fun!
Her tests were quite hard and I didn't like her method of recorded lectures very much. However, the peer mentors and review sessions were very useful, but I wish that she had synchronous classes as well instead of only group office hours.
Has high ratings for BIOL252, but for BIOL202 she is definitely not the best. Test 2 was insanely hard for the Spring 2021 semester compared to the last semester. Test averages were low and she had to curve it by ALOT and were still in the 70s. Literally destroyed my chances of getting an A. I read the book, did GRQs, everything Save yourself. Run
She cares about you. Her FYS was super interesting and engaging. I highly recommend it. I learned a lot. She's super nice and casual. She will respond to your emails in like 0.2 milliseconds. Her tests/quizzes are all worded very weirdly, and are on the most difficult content of each unit. But you will survive and do fine. Take her class!
Amazing professor! She has done really well with making learning easier throughout the remote process! I loved her
Dr. Z is so nice outside of class but she honestly made A&P way harder than it needed to be. The material was not challenging but she presented it in such a disorganized way and couldnt finish a sentence for her life. You would never know she has a PhD in this subject by listening to her lectures. Nice person, just really poor lectures :/
Dr. Zwemer is a true gem in the biology department. I had her for 202 and made sure to get in with her for 252. Group office hours were my favorite part of the week because they were always so much fun with her. Her exams can be a bit hard because she really likes application based questions but she is also generous with grading.
Dr Z is a great choice for Biol classes at UNC. She is really enthusiastic and did her best to be accommodating and understanding with online classes while still delivering the course material in an engaging way. Her tests are pretty hard though!
Overrated professor. We are basically taught by Khan Academy as she gets her notes from there. Makes tests unnecessarily hard and definitely trys to trick you. Not suprised as the biology department can't give out too many As that is UNC STEM in a nutshell. She is nice but she should stick to research, not teaching. As a 4.0 student, run or say bye
Dr. Z is a professor who seemed very nice at first. Her first exam was fair and the classwork was as well. However, the second exam killed my chances of getting an A. This exam was unnecessarily hard and some of the questions were created with commonly confused words to make you mess up. Office hours also did not help.
Dr. Zwemer is a great professor and she emphasized necessary concepts in her lectures. Her exams had some tough questions but overall, they were fair. I thought her lectures were organized and I enjoyed the content. She was very accommodating this past semester with the challenges of online school. She is one of the nicest professors I've ever had!
Dr. Zwemer has been my favorite professor at UNC in the Biology department. I have had her for both BIOL 202 and 252, and she made both classes really fun and understandable. Her exams are very fair, but you have to put in the work and study for them as they are application based and wording matters. She is very accessible in/out of the classroom.
She is SO caring and kind. However, I didn't love how she structured the class and wrote exams. I hated the asynchronous lectures. It felt like we spent WAY too much time on some topics, and rushed through others. Exams were short so you couldn't miss much. I've heard 252 varies a lot by professor, so I probably would pick another.
Professor Zwemer is really kind and charismatic. She will be your cheerleader for the semester. With that said, she will not make exceptions for anyone, you must earn your grade. You have a lot of opportunities to succeed with homework and participation, but the exams have really tough wording so you have to know the material expertly. hit or miss
Dr. Zwemer is a great professor. She explains concepts clearly and responds quickly. She likes to write trick questions on exams, but it shouldn't be bad if you actually study. It's important to figure out how to study. Textbook reading is optional but you should if you want an A. I suggest you focus less on reading lectures & more on problems.
Dr. Zwemer made me really interested in genetics! She explained the material very well, it's just somewhat difficult material. She is an AWESOME person and gives great feedback. you will have to work for an A. curved exams and reweighted lowest exam to help students out. TAKE HER!
While Dr. Zwemer is an enthusiastic and nice professor, I would recommend taking the other professor for this course. The class was unnecessarily hard, and it felt that at times, the tests were designed to trick a lot of the students. The lectures were alright, and participation is a big part of the class and is at times extremely unnecessary.
my FAVORITE prof at UNC! She does a fantastic job of teaching and explaining material that can be somewhat complex. She's also really great about building connections between lectures and making sure the students are getting it. She builds active learning into her class, so follow her suggestions and you'll learn things really well! take her class!
People are not exaggerating when they say that physiology is hard. Professor Zwemer is a really good professor and she presents the information as best as possible. The TAs are very good as well, attending their sessions were really valuable because whenever I didnt understand Zwemers explanations, they had different ones that were helpful.
Dr. Zwemer is one of the nicest professors! She is super accommodating and a great lecturer. That being said, do the GRQs before class. Technically they are optional, but if you don't, you won't understand a thing and it is very easy to fall behind in this class. Exams were fair and she takes regrade requests seriously.
A very nice person and emphasizes important ideas, but lectures are kind of all over the place and hard to take notes on. Often have to rewatch lectures to really understand information because the lecture slides are never in the same order as the student ones.
Dr. Zwemer is very knowledgeable, but too scatterbrained for me and I hate the way there were duplicates of slides on the PPT, making it clunky.
I loved Dr. Zwemer! She really cares & tries her best to make sure we do well. Her tests are pretty hard and all application questions, but if you work hard to understand the material you should do decently. She gave us bonus halloween points on a test just because. I loved talking to her in office hours, I always felt so much clarity afterwards.
Dr. Zwemer had really difficult exams that counted for a huge portion of the final grade. But she was super kind & funny. She had a large class but still checked in with me after seeing my poor exam scores. When I communicated to her that I was struggling with my mental health, she gave me both reassurance and encouragement. That meant a lot to me.
Zwemer has a very unique teaching style that you will either love or hate. There are so many moving parts in this class it is hard to keep up with. Not a bad teacher by any means, but maybe go for someone else if this doesn't sound great to you.
Quite possibly one of the worst instructors I have ever had. Exams are almost impossible because she words them horrifically, and many questions focus on the most brief details discussed in class. She seem's nice the first week or so, but by the end, shes snarky and condescending. Maybe she just wasn't for me, but try to get someone else first.
This was my third class with Dr. Z, and it was one of her best courses! She has a clear grading criteria and wants to make sure everyone succeeds. In this class, she wanted us to enjoy the class and material instead of worry about our grades. She gave great feedback and the quizzes were not bad. Awesome class and great professor!
The material is interesting and fairly easy to follow but her tests are tricky & take a long time. There are some practice problems available online. She wants you to succeed, but can be condescending & that made me not want to try as much. I recommend working more with SIs/the TA than Dr. Z. for help. Doable, not amazing
She is a great professor, she really cares about what she is teaching. She has a bad rep for giving hard tests, but I really did not find them that difficult. You get a cheat sheet for every exam, she usually makes the most missed question(s) extra credit. I loved this class and highly recommend her, especially if you can get in her smaller section
Her tests are pretty difficult, and she sometimes tests on material which is glossed over in lecture. However, I feel like her ability to teach difficult concepts is absolutely amazing. Most problems I've had with the course are just the bio department/UNC Board of govs limiting the amount of A's. She's very caring and kind. Take her!
What I loved the most about Dr. Zwemer's class was that emphasis was placed on problem-solving, rather than rote memorization. Tests, thus, are mostly application-based, and any questions that most of the class got wrong were made into extra credit. The final was curved (from what I can tell) and non-exam portions of the grade were easy As.
Dr. Z had a great personality and cared deeply for her students. Aside from this, her exams often seemed unfinished and it was a common occurrence to receive points back for poorly worded questions or those without a clear answer. We also only had a practice exam for the first midterm. As other reviews say, she does lecture all over the place.
This class is a mess. Deadlines are created and often moved without any communication. The exam questions are so specific and outside the scope of the class; they are created with intent to fail students. Dr. Zwemer is scatterbrained and has terrible communication skills, which would be nice for a fast-paced summer class. This class is poorly run.
Took this over the summer so the workload was insane but necessary. Take tons of notes during lecture bc exam questions are based off lecture. She gives great study tips that worked for me. Super kind and engaging person and gives you what you need to succeed.
Poor course structure
I loved Dr. Zwemer. Her lectures are really interesting and engaging, and it is obvious she cares a ton about her students and about the course. She does talk super quickly during lectures, but she records all of them so it is easy to go back and review something if needed. Would highly recommend her.
This was a zoom P/F class called exploring health professions. It was pretty interesting to hear from healthcare speakers and there were 2 easy assignments a week. You were allowed to miss 2 classes and it ended early in November.
Dr. Zwemer was incredibly nice. I personally passed failed this class because I realized I didn't need to take it after add drop had already ended. Go to class!!! The lecture slides are a bit scattered and they don't make a ton of sense if you don't listen to her explain them in person. You can tell she cares and she wants you to succeed!
She seems like a good person, but her slides are unorganized and the questions of the exams are very difficult and most of the time do not get reviewed in lecture. You could know the textbook like the back of your hand and watch every lecture 5 times and still fail the exams.
Zwemer was nice but the grade is really based on tests. There's a cheat sheet which is great but she makes the questions conceptual and it makes it hard and confusing. You have to get participation points as well so you have to go to class to do Learning Catalytics. Mastering hw also but you only need to complete 80% of it for 100%. No late credit.
Zwemer means well and does her best to keep lectures entertaining, but there's too much content to fit into 3 credit hours and you have to do a LOT of reading to keep up with the material. You're allowed to have a cheat sheet but it doesn't do you much good, and she's not very forgiving when it comes to absences/late work.
Several common phrases used in Lilian Zwemer's lecture: "Let me see bababa...... So this uhhhh [insert structure here]'s function is uhhhh let me check my notes..... Oh yes! [Insert function here]" "What a FUN question! I don't know the answer" "Mea Culpa, andioop, I made a mistake in my lecture the correct [insert] should be[insert]"
Dr. Z was nice but I feel the course was structured poorly. There is way too much material and it is all very dense. Each lesson was split into multiple parts which ended up confusing. The exams are very difficult. She had scheduled asynch days once every 2 weeks which I was not a fan of. She often talked to us like children which got annoying.
This class was very difficult for me and Dr. Zwemer didn't really help. She is very scatterbrained and I never knew what was going on in lecture, I would always have to rewatch them to semi understand the material. The exams are soooo difficult and it feels like she wants to trick you. I liked her as a person, but I would suggest a diff prof.
You can tell how much Dr Zwemer she cares for students and wants them to do well!!! the content can be pretty complicated in this class but she does her best to explain things as clearly as possible,and records her lectures too if ur confused.plenty of resources; also once she recognized and said hi to me outside of class and it made me rly happy
I took this fall of 2022 and my friends are currently taking it with different professors and are doing much better. Zwemer's lecture style did not work for me, or many others. She was passive-aggressive in lectures. Her tests were very tricky with the wording of the question. Felt as if she wanted you to do poorly.
Save yourself the trouble and take another professor for this class. Reads off of notes word for word and lectures are very scripted. seems like she only learns what she wants to teach before lecture. Every time somebody asks her a question she hand-waves it or doesn't know how to answer it and says "I don't know ask a...(the subject's profession)
The way she structures the lectures, "optional" participation, prework, postwork, etc is not only incredibly overwhelming, but also way too demanding. She knows this class is difficult, but has high expectations for the amount of work students can reasonably put in outside of lecture in order to be successful.
She's just so silly! (she makes me miserable everyday) :')
This has been the worst and most challenging class I have ever taken at UNC. Preparing for exams is horrible. It's so much content. She also tests on material that she doesn't cover in the lecture, even if it was just one question on a hw assignment. She also is so condescending, for example, "I'm not going over this you should know it already".
Dr Z is a kind and lovely human being. However, do not take her classes if you want to leave with any confidence in yourself or your abilities. You can study forever, go to all the review sessions, go to the learning center, meet with her, and you will still likely not succeed. Her tests are impossible, even when you think you did good you didn't.
I really enjoy Dr. Zwemer's sense of humor and I think she is a great person, however, her teaching style does not work at all for me (flipped classroom). The tests do not reflect what we learn in class and are mainly application questions. She does give credit back which is extremely nice of her but barely raises your grade. And no practice exams.
BIOL104 is a needed break from cell biology. Lectures were thorough, and the material on exams was straightforward and easy to succeed on if you prepared. Dr. Z made an effort to learn student's names in a large lecture hall, and was very accessible outside of class to meet. She obviously cares about her students, and makes the class interesting
Zwemer is a good professor. She wants you to be engaged in class and ask questions all the time.
cheat sheet for tests, pacing is every well, you will be just fine!
Lectures were pretty interesting, Dr. Zwemer tried to make them as interactive as possible despite being in an older lecture hall. The exam and quiz questions were extremely tough and sometimes worded confusingly.
The content itself is easy, but her wording on exams is what will get you. Claims she has spent years studying people and knows what works best, but also constantly has errors in exams. INCREDIBLY passive aggressive and condescending when you ask questions. This class would've been so easy if I had taken it with someone else. Do not recommend.
Dr. Zwemer has no flaws as a professor. She is kind, caring, funny, and knows what she's talking about. Her exams can be tricky due to wording, but they're more than doable and she is the most generous professor I've seen when it comes to giving extra credit or overlooking some questions that many people did bad on.
Dr. Zwemer is a nice person and BIOL 104 has relatively easy content. That said, I wasn't a huge a fan of the lectures. I found them confusing at times, and they dragged on a lot. Also, quizzes and exams were worded very weirdly. She encourages a lot of participation and group work. You mainly have to teach yourself everything from the reading.
Zwemer was understanding and helpful in one on one environments, however in lecture I found her to be rather passive-aggressive and frustrating. Exams were frustrating and trickily worded. She seems aware of students' complaints about her and responds to them passive-aggressively in lectures. She would be funny if she weren't so frustrating.
Fine person but a terrible lecturer. Her lectures are disorganized, and you can never tell what is going to be on a test or not. Because of that, her tests are also absolutely atrocious to take. Overall, she's very nice, but her class is so disorganized and poorly taught that I just never want her again as a professor.
This class is tough. Somewhat of a wakeup call for me that I need to study more, but even then, this class was ridiculously hard for me as well as people I took the class with. Dr. Zwemer is a solid professor but man is this class a little bit too difficult in my opinion.
The course content is not too hard, however Dr. Zwemer is extremely disorganized so it is so hard to keep up with her during lecture. She is super funny and caring, but her style of teaching is not the best and definitely needs some improvements.
Zwemer's teaching style is very disorganized. She tests on very specific, tiny details she says in class. She has told us to not trust the internet, online resourses or even the book- only trust what she says. At times, is rude to students. Exams are extremely difficult. If you don't understand a topic she tells the class to teach it to themselves.
Dr. Z was a great professor, spending lots of time inside and, if necessary, outside of the classroom helping student understand content. She is always available and willing to help reason through topics with students despite this being a tough class. Highly recommend taking her.
Dr. Zwemer is animated and knowledgeable in terms of content. She tends to get excited and fly through slides but is happy to reiterate if you raise your hand. Getting full participation credit is kind of annoying, but if you front-load the work by posting Peerwise questions early in the semester then you don't have to worry about it later.
Very bad. She forces you to go to 5 PM sessions (outside of class time) so you can earn the regular participation credit (which is absurd because this class does not have an associated recitation so she technically shouldn't be able to do that). Tests are poorly worded and confusing even though the material itself isn't meant to be difficult.
Dr. Zwemer is one of the best professors I've had at unc! Despite it being an intro class she really cared and wanted you to truly understand the content and wanted to make sure you were okay in life. The tests can be difficult but nothing that wasn't covered in class. Definitely take 104 with Zwemer if you can!
You have to work hard to do well in this class but Dr. Zwemer gives you everything you need to be able to do that. BIO at UNC is hard but Zwemer makes it so worth it. Her lectures are engaging and everything is very intentional. Shes gonna expect that you work hard but if you do her tests are not that bad.
Great professor. Cares a lot about students' wellbeing and mental health. Approachable. Kind and caring. Weekly email to us telling us the plan for the following week. At the end would be a fun fact or something interesting about herself. Lectures for me are pretty straight forward and easy to understand. Curve exams if the averages are too low.
The exams are super hard. They do not correlate with lecture material. There are a lot of made up scenarios as exam questions which do not help those of us going into the medical field who need to know real anatomy and physiology. Highly advise taking with another professor and the class will actually be how the class is supposed to be.
This professor is very nice a clearly wants you to succeed. I took her for BIOL202 and she was great but not for 252. She messed up during lectures a lot and had to read her notes during certain lectures. I do not think she knows the material as well as BIOL202 material. She can also be very passive aggressive at the beginning of classes.
I wouldn't take a class with her again. Extra participation requirements other than going to class. The exams were odd and the way she writes questions is weird and unclear. You cannot review exams unless you go to exam review sessions. The final is not cumulative which is nice, but I really did not like this class.
Get ready to cringe. Her lecture style does not fit my learning type. Instead of focusing on the concepts she makes up weird analogies that are not even related to the content, confusing me more. One good aspect of her course structure is that the final is not cumulative which re-leaves some pressure during the stressful exam season
Dr. Zwemer is extremely passionate about what she teaches and honestly I love her. She's become one of my favorites. The analogies she uses are helpful metaphors for how to remember info (she'll sometimes tip to the class what will be on the exam). She's SUPER caring for her student's wellbeing too! Final is noncumulative too :)
Avoid. take with any other professor. Participation worth only 12% but u have to do so much to get it. Lecture style-confusing. Analogies so confusing, most unrelated to bio. Quirky exam questions, difficult to follow, unnecessarily difficult. Allowed cheat sheet for exams. Unclear whats part of subject matter for exam (confusing). She checks notes
Avoid Zwemer if you can, her exams are ambiguous, she allows cheat sheets but they don't help much when she throws absolute curveballs on the exams that she did not cover in class. Nice teacher though but you will never see me in another one of her lectures.
Participation/attendance factored into grade but flexible, non-cumulative final, tests are largely based on application rather than regurgitation of material. Lecture style is not for everyone. She leaned a lot on her notes, slides, and peer mentors for lectures and could be frustrating to ask questions if you didn't get her analogies.
Pros: - Happy and charismatic professor who gave very interesting (complex) lectures - Accessible outside of class - Homework was manageable - Cheat sheets were allowed for exams! Cons: - Exams were insanely difficult - Does not have much trust in her students - Study sessions outside of class were not very helpful - The lab is agregious
Overall, pretty good and lectures are usually good enough for the exams but also supplementing them with Piazza sample questions helps. Exam 2 has a problem of poor wording (you get a curve) but most questions across all exams are fine as long as you read them carefully. Lots of content but they all connect--there are far, far worse professors.
AVOID. I think she is a good person herself BUT she is a really bad lecturer. Tests are insanely difficult and it does not matter how much you study. Cheat sheets area allowed but it's a scam. The questions are application questions that you literally cannot study for. If you have an option to take it w Ott or another bio professor please do.
Lectures were not engaging at all and were often dominated by confusing analogies to anatomy that were never helpful, minor pathophysiology that only accounted for 1 exam question, and extremely rushed final 10 minutes of class since time management always seemed like an issue. Exams weren't bad but I basically taught myself everything.
Dr. Z is very friendly and funny, especially during group office hours, which were always great! However, lectures were often disorganized and rushed. That said, I thought exams were pretty fair, and there were always bonus questions. Getting participation credit was a pain, but doable. I still learned a lot, but much of that came from self-study.
This class was harrrrd, but so so awesome. Dr.Zwemer sets you up for success. The exams are hard, but if you work hard you will be fine. Your worst exam is worth only 9% and the final is non-cumulative, you get a cheat sheet of every exam. Barely any homework, just a lot of studying. She will make you a better student.
Dr. Zwemer tries to relate class content to stories, however, it detracts from the content and often means that learning objectives will be cut or heavily edited. Her test are not comprehensive of the entire unit, rather focusing heavily on one or two lessons in detail. She is passionate and allows cheats sheet, just not for me.
Convoluted lectures. Tricky (but non-cumulative) exams. GRQ's mandatory and take forever. Unfair participation grading. Sometimes passive aggressive. Condescending and micromanaging. BUT, she clearly cares about her students as people and about their education and is passionate about the subject matter. I would still avoid if possible.
BIOL220. Zwemer=condescending, especially e-mails. Her personality distracts us from learning. Disorganized lectures. Exam this semester was trickery instead testing on the actual material. Most of the participation items, 10% of the grade, should be optional. Telling us we can purchase Girl Scout cookies via her daughter's friend is inappropriate.
Course wise, Dr. Zwemer teaches adequately and provides ample materials to succeed in her somewhat difficult tests. She clearly cares about her students and their learning, enough to mandate a "no-electronics" class session after she observed a small portion of students were off task. Although she clearly cares, those actions felt like high school.
Dr. Zwemer, while clearly caring about her students and their education, sometimes is uncompromising in her ways. If a minority of the class is off task/not performing well, she will mandate a "no electronics" day, like back in High School. Course-wise, her lectures are fair and she provides ample material to succeed on her somewhat difficult exams
She isn't prepared. She admitted the other day she wasn't ready for a problem. Lectures are scattered with tangents. Assistants keep changing times of sessions which precludes anyone who preplans from attending and is part of tasks counting for 10% of the grade which is unethical. There are teaching assistants who cannot even be aurally understood.
Dr. Zwemer is awful. You could be on your death bed and theres no extensions. I went asking for advice on how to simply pass. She told me that I was struggling to stay afloat and to withdraw. I have a disability so it was awful dealing with this matter. She really does not understand her students and is not a proper lecturer either.
She would constantly go on tangents and mumble which made it hard to stay focused in an hour and fifteen minute long class. She expects you to remember every detail mentioned in class and her exams are extremely specific. She seems like a nice person but she cannot teach.
Dr. Zwemer holds very confusing lectures that are hard to keep up with, and for some reason refuses to write down anything she says. Her exams have questions that sometimes barely relate to the content, and she seems surprised that no one wants to participate in her lectures because of how hard it is to keep up with the content.
Acts like she cares about students but is extremely passive aggressive and just rude. Thank goodness for the SIs and PMs because they teach the whole class and write the exams. She goes on long tangents and makes things unnecessarily hard, and then complains when people dont participate. go to PM and SI sessions because you wont learn from her
Lectures are long + content-heavy. Readings felt practically useless sometimes. She uses so many metaphors that studying for exams is unreasonably difficult. Doesn't have the same lenient policies as other sections. Practice tests are made by PMs, not her, and tests are hyperspecific to random stuff so preparing is difficult. PMs carry her class.
Terrible professor. bad at lecturing and is extremely unorganized. Practice exams are written by SI's and not by her, making her tests (which are already very specific on certain topics) harder than they should be. hard to keep focused in her class because she goes off on so many tangents. Bad at explaining things and is uncompromising on deadlines
she is awful at teaching BIOL 220. This was her first year doing so and she was so unorganized and the tests she made were so specific on the most random details said in lecture. It frustrated me that she wouldn't release the answer key to previous exams because it made it impossible for me to learn from my mistakes.
Dr. Zwemer is a good professor, but genetics with her was hard! Tests are mostly lecture based, so I would recommend rewatching/taking notes on the lecture videos she posted as this helped me do well. Her test questions can be a little tricky, so read them carefully! Her group office hours were really helpful for any class questions I had!
Dr. Zwemer, although very intelligent, was not a good instructor. She came off as very condescending and made concepts much more difficult than needed. She also made participation difficult, essentially forcing students to attend peer tutoring, instructional sessions, and making piazza posts IN ADDITION to doing all of the learning catalytics.
I feel like the content was interesting but she made the class extremely difficult. She even admitted to "teaching us one way but testing us another way". She is very condescending and tries to be relatable/likeable but it is just so hard to. I am truthful when I say the content was interesting but she made my experience so bad.
Biology has always been harder for me but I really did not like having Zwemer as a professor. She comes off as snobby and rude. If the class doesn't understand something she automatically assumes its the class not studying and not her teaching. Exams can be super tricky and specific to things she says that aren't always written in slides.
Dr. Zwemer is a decent lecturer who tries to make her slideshows engaging. Exams usually had a few unfair questions but the bonus questions cancelled them out. The convoluted participation system and lack of official practice exam material, however, were annoying. Would definitely take right after 103 due to similarities in structure and content.
PROS: stretch breaks, her waving outside of class to you, good personality, records lectures. CONS: tricksy tests, comes to class unprepared, unnecessary outside of class participation, very lecture heavy, not enough time for exams, gets impatient when you don't immediately understand, tests on small details, snarky in her replies to Piazza
I don't think there are enough bad things I can say about her. She comes to class unprepared, tries to relate course material to pointless metaphors, the MOST condescending teacher ever (questioned the classes reading capabilities one day), tests on material learned in recitation taught by students, and has a ridiculous participation system.
She was walking around barefoot in the classroom then has the audacity to ask why we are distracted...
Pros: stretch breaks, group talk rather than figuring things out alone, enthusiastic about material Cons: can be a little hard to understand with the metaphors/explanations, few questions on tests, can be daunting to ask/answer without feeling judged for not knowing the answer, pressures others to answer in class even with others volunteering
Her lectures seemed unorganized, and she would sometimes discuss content not related to what we needed to know. Tests were SOO specific for no reason, and she required participation on top of Learning Catalytics so even if you show up to class you dont receive full participation. She also dosent release exam keys which is detrimental to studying.
She just does not seem to want to help ever. It's as if ur wasting her time. Section of sylly on letters of rec that basically says before you ask me, don't just think if I like u/u did well/came to my OH/ think if I can actually attest to u as a person/how I have affected u, but then discourages ppl from asking her questions. Tests confusing too.
Prof Zwemer is a good professor, and the class isn't significantly more difficult than 103, but the participation requirements are infuriating. If you go to every single lecture, you will only receive a 6/10 for participation; to get 10/10 you must either attend office hours, peer mentor sessions, or do what is essentially extra homework.
Avoid her at all costs. Exams are unethical: they do not reflect what is taught in class (when she actually teaches). She is more concerned about getting attention than paying attention to her students. Participation is also unethical: TA's change times or cancel sessions with almost no notice.
Do not take Zwemer! She's condescending in her lectures and requires additional participation outside of Learning Catalytics. Her tests are so specific and it's an extremely annoying process to review your exam. Also, I didn't take 103 at UNC (I transferred the credit in) and she made it very clear she did not like that.
The professor's teaching style is hit-or-miss. While the content is interesting, the strict participation requirements and unconventional exam questions make the class unnecessarily difficult. Unstuck study was a lifesaver for preparing.
You have all the tools to do well in the class, but Dr. Zwemmer is really hit or miss as a person. You can tell when she's in a bad mood, and if you ask her to repeat herself you'll just get a condescending response. Things like this discourage students from speaking up in class, but she'll also get angry at the class for not responding.
Although the content taught is very interesting, her teaching style is disorganized and will sometimes veer off on tangents. The exams did not reflect a big picture understanding of the material, but rather focused on specific aspects of the lecture which made them somewhat tricky. Also, the outside participation was very tedious and annoying.
Dr. Zwemer is one of my fav bio professors at UNC. The outside participation is a little annoying but it's pretty straight forward and simple stuff! The lectures are really engaging and she does a great job making the difficult concepts easier to visualize, also really good help options like group office hours and pm sessions
Dr. Zwemer is a sweet person and she is clear about what she expects people to do to excel. However, her test questions are highly specific and confusing at times. PM sessions and SI sessions felt more confusing than helpful. Nice person, but if I had to do it all over, I wouldn't take her class.
Dr. Zwemer is a really nice professor and cares about her students, but is very confusing when she teaches. She never emphasises what is important and her tests are meant to confuse you. I would take Corey Johnson instead.
Dr. Zwemer is a great professor. I see many people saying she is confusing, but if you study the lecture slides, you will get an A in this class. She is funny and makes the material as digestible as possible. This was my first bio class at UNC and I did well from simply reviewing lectures before the exams.
save yourself. take a different professor. my semester was unbearable because of this class. does NOT allow for cheat sheets on exams. exams are insanely hard with obscure info that she mentioned once in class. i studied for 2 weeks for a 60. 2-3 3-6 page GRQs due each week, 4 exams worth 75% of class grade. no extra credit, no curving, no rounding
GRQ's are low yield Use anki I beg, was a game changer Make anki cards directly from slides and practice alot
Zwemer is sweet, but lectures are boring and not straight to the point. We also did not get the same access to review sessions and additional practice like Shemer's class, they learned material that we did not. Lectures often contained material that was not relevant, then we were tested on very specific information in the slides.
The participation component of this class has got to be the most needlessly involved and ridiculous thing I've seen in my college career so far. Not only do you have to attend 10 sessions to get your 4 points (0.4 points each), but you can only achieve 2.4 points per type of review session. If we can get by on the lectures and homework, let us.
I really enjoyed this class with Dr. Zwemer. People say her lectures are confusing but if you actually pay attention in class you will have no trouble figuring out what she will emphasize on exams. Her grading is very fair. She dives into the nuances of biology rather than making something sound black and white when it is not, which I appreciate.
Dr. Zwemer is by far one of the best professors I've had at UNC. She is hilarious during lectures and always keeps things interesting, chaotic at times but in the best way. She makes difficult concepts easy to understand and is super available outside of class. Lectures are crucial and you do have to put the work in, but the class is so rewarding.
I have no problems with Dr. Zwemer as a professor. Her lectures are amazing and her exams are fair. BUT, she can be EXTREMELY passive aggressive when you talk to her 1 on 1. She can be very rude, even when you approach her nicely and respectfully.
She has a strong personality and can seem mean sometimes, but I think she's just trying to make the class more fun. For BIOL 405, it's less lecturing and more discussion on societal topics. Exams are sometimes hard, but they're not a big percentage of your grade. It was the most enjoyable BIOL class I've taken here! Take a class with Dr. Z!
As a person, she is fine, as a teacher she is the opposite. Each lecture, she messed up on at least one topic. Whoever says her lectures were good must have never been because each one was jam packed and she resumed, causing mistakes. Tests were also pretty hard. I would not take another class with her.
4 exams that are very doable if you just study what she has in lectures. The final can be worth 10% of grade if it is worse than all of your midterms as well. I thought her lectures were good and interesting and it was pretty clear to see what you needed to know. Most annoying thing was the outside participation though.
She messes up at least one part of the lecture in every class, and she requires both in/outside participation. I also disliked how she does not release her actual exams, just scores. Instead, she schedules two sessions to 'view' your exam, which I have never been able to go to due to class/work conflicts. Avoid her class at all costs.
I honestly don't know how she stills has a job at this university or how she even got hired. She has no idea what she is doing. Every lecture, there was something she messed up on and a student had to correct her. Her lectures are not good and neither are her slides. The only way to do well on tests is pray, you can't even study for them.
Zwemer is super nice, and 220 really isn't that bad of a class, ESPECIALLY if you take it after taking 103 with Ott. Zwemer's exams are much more clear and about Biology than Ott's.
Funny & good sense of humor. makes effort to learn people's names. GRQ & mastering for each lesson. lowest exam worth 10% rest are 21% including final. have to do outside of class participation but easy 100 for 4% of grade. LCs for attendance. Records class which is nice. Does not give you exam answers back. no practice exams either.
Dr. Zwemer's lectures were honestly extremely entertaining. The content was enjoyable and she was passionate and funny. Her tests are heavily based on lecture content so I recommend rewatching them to study for exams. I went to every PM session as well which made earning the outside participation a breeze. I strongly recommend Dr. Zwemer for 220!
Pretty accommodating w/ attendance/illness (despite in-class participation depending on Learning Catalytics almost every lecture)- lectures always recorded w/ captions, annotated/blank slides posted online. Sometimes needed a reminder on Piazza to make them public, but quick to respond. Content is like beefed up AP Bio with a focus on genetics.
Dr. Zwemer is a great professor who obviously cares about her teaching. Many opportunities outside of class to receive help and also very kind. I didn't take the pre req bio classes here at UNC and she warns that if you didn't, you might struggle in the class. In all honesty, just review the slides she gives and I'm sure you will be fine.
Dr Z is hilarious, and grading criteria is clear -- each exam is ~20% and your lowest is 10% (including the final), so I did really well on early exams and coasted through the final (rip). There's a lot of minute details to learn, but was clear on what you had to know. Can be a bit condescending over email, outside participation is annoying.
Worest class I have ever taken at UNC. Exams never align with class content and no offical practice exams, which are deterimental to study. DO NOT TAKE. AVOID at all cost and save your GPA.
Everything that is tested on comes DIRECTLY from the lectures. She posts the lectures online so if you rewatch each lecture a few times you are guaranteed to get a good grade and learn every interesting fact in the world of Genetics. Fun, funny, relevant, structured class.
Dr Z has some really hard exams and doesn't release them afterwards. She talks to you like a kindergartener and her slides are really convoluted. Good enough lecturer, but she doesn't annotate her slides much. The course is heavily credited on exams, and there are a lot of homework assignments that do not always feel relevant.
If you value fairness and professionalism, avoid this class.she filed an academic misconduct report against me for “AI usage” with zero evidence, even after multiple AI-detection tools confirmed that my work was completely original. Instead of reviewing facts, she jumped to conclusions and escalated it through student conduct without justification.
For the love of god please do not take this class with her. I am saving your soul.
DO NOT TAKE BIOL220 WITH DR Z! She explains material very well in class, but the exams have so many questions on the SMALLEST details instead of concepts we actually cover in class. It's impossible to do well on them unless you think exactly like she does and they're over 70% of your grade. Absurdly difficult for a required course for many majors.
220 can be a really tough course, but her lectures are super engaging and the slides are pretty clear. The tests are brutal, but the SI sessions and the slides are really helpful.
biology 220
This professor makes the class unnecessarily hard—requiring outside participation, grading slowly, assigning work on holidays, and rushing through lectures without detail. Other sections are easier, for example, they get cheat sheets on exams, Zwemer does not do this, and they do not have extra work. If you can, take this course with someone else.
Took in Fall 24. Originally I hated this class. However, after studying for the MCAT, I realized that Dr. Zwemer actually forced me to learn information that was extremely important to later applications. The class is tough and sometimes the explainations make no sense, but if you really want to understand the content, I would recommend 10/10
Dr. Zwemer is passive-aggressive and condescending when she speaks to you. I was scared to go to class or to talk to her when I had questions. She's also sneaky and adds easter eggs into assignments to catch students using outside sources. Take this class with ANYONE ELSE.
I enjoyed Zwemer's teaching style; however, she often sped through slides, and we would have to watch additional lecture videos at home to make up for the content we didn't get to. The exams are overwhelmingly difficult; I felt like I needed a PhD in genetics to succeed in the class. If you hate yourself, take this course with her.
Dr. Z makes this a hard class, but imo it is very worth it. I truly learned so much this semester, not just genetics, but about how to really learn. Go to the learning center, go to GOH, do critical slide review method, if you are still struggling, reach out to her for extra practice. She is very caring about students but sets clear expectations.
I'm torn between blaming myself for not doing as well as I wanted or blaming Zwemer for speeding through slides, causing me to teach everything back to myself later, which took so much time. She explains concepts well, provides help if you just ask, and the exams are fair (still difficult), but expect to put a ton of detailed work into this class.
Hot take: BIOL 220 is hard, but it's not Zwemer's fault! In class she was engaging, funny, and made the content/her expectations clear. Her student engagement and outside-of-class participation requirement helped me get a B+ after a B in BIOL 103. PLEASE go see Robin B at the learning center and go to the weekly SI sessions if you need help!
I worked so hard studying for this class and made so many sacrifices. Her exams often ask questions that we would not be able to answer based on the way she taught us in class. This is true for both Physiology and Genetics. It is upsetting as no matter how smart or how hard you work she is such a bad professor it does not matter.
Zwemer isn't as bad as people say, definitely not bad enough to put off taking the class with her. This isn't an easy class, but it's not impossible. An A is very achievable if you put in the work; pay attention in class, rewatch lectures, do the practice and you should be fine. I honestly like Zwemer, she's super funny and makes class engaging.
Dr. Zwemer is passive-aggressive and condescending when she speaks to you and with teaching or responding to questions in class. She's also sneaky and adds easter eggs into assignments to catch students using outside sources. Take this class with ANYONE ELSE. Nice lady but teaches as if we're going to get a PhD out of this class.
Dr. Zwemer's exams are extremely hard. But I think if you put in the effort, showing up to class, rewatching all of the lectures, and doing the practice, you can succeed. Her exams often have weirdly worded questions, so you will need reading comprehension skills as well. But Dr. Zwemer herself is really funny, sweet, and has good intentions.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
74%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.85 avg changeRatings by Course
BIO105A2002
5.0
(1)BIO152
5.0
(1)BIO102
5.0
(1)BIO89
5.0
(1)BIOL490
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
BIOL252AND220
5.0
BIO202
4.2
BIO105A2002
4.0
BIO152
4.0
BIO102
4.0