3.8

Loren Baybrook

English - University of Wisconsin Oshkosh

3.8
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
65%
Would Retake
224
Reviews
3.8
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
3.8
Helpful
3.8
Clarity

65%

Would Retake

224

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

141

4

7

3

11

2

17

1

48

What Students Say

The point is to improve

ENG300 - 5.0 rating

He was confusing, and difficult

ENG318 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

18%

Textbook Required

30%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 77 grades
Most common grades:
A (27)
A- (14)
B+ (11)
Grade Distribution
A(28)B(15)C(8)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(25)
Based on 92 reported grades
A: 27
A-: 14
B+: 11
B: 10
Common Tags
Caring (32)
Hilarious (27)
Amazing lectures (27)
Inspirational (25)
Gives good feedback (24)
Tough grader (17)
Graded by few things (17)
Amazing lectures (14)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.29 avg change
Feb
Apr
Sep
Dec
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENG300LEVEL

5.0

(4)

ENG381581

5.0

(4)

ENG581

5.0

(3)

LS200

5.0

(1)

ENG314

5.0

(1)
+26 more courses
Difficulty by Course

231

5.0

381

5.0

ENGLISH381

5.0

ENGLISH380

5.0

ENGLISH

5.0

Reviews (224)
2.0
4.0
ENG101
Nov 2, 2004

Do not take this teacher if you can help it. He goes on and on about little things and will kick students out if his class if he does not like them. Very picky about everything on tests, but very little actual writing is done.

5.0
5.0
381
Jan 4, 2005

Yes he's a hard grader. Get over it. It's college. I learned a lot in his class. His film course is cool, too.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Jan 5, 2005

Took literary criticism from Baybrook (Quiring). He's not afraid to confront lazy students, that's 4sure. But he graded pretty fairly, and he cared about whether students actually learned. Scary smart. Great professor.

5.0
1.0
ENG318
Jan 5, 2005

I worked (hard) for an A, and he gave me an A. Get the picture? :)

2.0
3.0
ENG101
Feb 9, 2005

He's not very clear and sometimes downright mean.

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Feb 22, 2005

I was in his 101 for the fall, and I thought he was very clear and really happy to help, but he certainly wasn't a sweetheart to all the goof-offs in this class.

3.0
3.0
UPPERLEVELENG
Apr 8, 2005

biggest tool in the english department. easily stroked- as long as you pump him full of his own ideas. people in his fan club do well in his classes; people who have the nerve to disagree with him have to work for it more. i'm not bitter, myself. I got A's from him. but he's still full of himself.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
May 9, 2005

One of the best professors I've had. No joke. I thought he would be a real hard case (he's known for that), but he's absolutely cool. Baybrook really helped me think through the theorists in this class. I would have preferred less formal lecturing, but it always led to great discussions.

1.0
5.0
ENGLISH381
May 31, 2005

Don't take this guy unless you want your headaches to go up and your gpa to go down. Brings a hostile attitude to class and many students feel really uncomfortable around him. I wanted to drop but I had to take the class. Very pompous and arrogant. I caught him in a contradiction in class once and his ego wouldn't let him admit he was wrong.

2.0
3.0
ENG381
Jun 17, 2005

I dreaded attending his boring, scripted lectures. He thought very little of his students' abilities from day one. He seems to think he's too good for UWO and acts snobby without teaching effectively. He only presents his ideas about theory. I doubt anyone in my class has a basic understanding of any of the material we covered.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Jun 18, 2005

Good class, but terribly hard. Baybrook helped me understand the ideas by getting us to think of them in practical terms, not just theoretical ones. He really loves teaching this stuff.

5.0
4.0
ENG300LEVEL
Jun 19, 2005

Very good, very tough. The key is to accept revision. Get defensive about your bad writing (or your faulty logic) and you lose.

1.0
5.0
ENGLISH380
Jul 13, 2005

Doesn't teach a whole lot, mostly just pops in a movie and says, "write a paper about this".....seems to not grasp how to relate to the students, but doesn't really care anyhow. Several students dropped his class because he is such a hard and unfair grader.

5.0
2.0
ENG381
Oct 22, 2005

Huh? Makes the most sense I've ever heard. Really smart. Connects things to the real world in ways that amaze me!

4.0
2.0
231LITFILM
Oct 26, 2005

i liked him. he was really smart, but didn't try to make the students feel stupid. lectures were pretty boring, but the class wasn't too bad. probably a lot better than other lit classes.

2.0
5.0
ENGLISH
Oct 28, 2005

this guy is full of himself to the nth degree. real hard grader and often puts students down.

5.0
2.0
ENG231
Oct 30, 2005

Nice professor and great class! It was a little deep for 200 level but he didn't push us too hard. The discussions in class were incredible and Baybrook was very kind to everyone.

5.0
2.0
ENG231
Grade: D+
Nov 7, 2005

There's rarely a dull moment, although the discussions and lectures (which he posts online rather than actually reading them) do push you to think! But he keeps it all clear by asking us specific questions through each step. This is why I went to college. Great professor.

5.0
3.0
ENG318
Nov 21, 2005

I don't know how, but he makes grammar interesting. Tests can be difficult. For advanced composition we only wrote ONE paper. Overall awesome teacher.

1.0
5.0
381
Nov 30, 2005

This guy's class is dull and uninteresting. He often talks down on the students and it's impossible to get an "A" because of his narrow conception of what an "A" is. In fact, a lot of students challenge their final grades because their so upset with what they got. Therefore, if you want to be bored and have your GPA lowered, take this class.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Jan 17, 2006

He knows his stuff, but he listens to counter-arguments. He helped me figure out what I was trying to say in my papers. It was hard. But I liked him so much that I changed my minor to English.

5.0
4.0
ENG381581
Jan 29, 2006

I thought this class would be boring and hard, but it was incredibly good. LB rocks! He doesn't lecture very much, and he posts the lectures on D2L. We read a couple of essays each week, discussed them pretty closely, and then did some poems and film clips. I learned so much my brain hurt! He's really nice, but he does require you to focus.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Mar 29, 2006

Tries to intimidate students but ultimately seemed rational to me. However, does have little quirks and believes firmly in certain things like being respectful and holding class for the whole time.

5.0
2.0
ENG381
Sep 14, 2006

He's a very helpful professor, and the lectures/discussions are incredible.

5.0
2.0
ENG381
Sep 27, 2006

i can't believe this is my favorite class.

5.0
2.0
ENG318
Nov 20, 2006

Thanks to professor, the class was very interesting, reasonably difficult.

4.0
4.0
ENG381
Dec 15, 2006

No Comments

4.0
4.0
ENGCRIT
Feb 4, 2007

This guy is great. Smart, concise, challenging, but well worth it. Definitely one of the best teachers I ahve ever had.

5.0
3.0
ENG581
May 7, 2007

Really interesting. Learned way too much, and loved it.

2.0
5.0
ENG381
May 8, 2007

Worst professor I've ever had. It was impossible to pay attention in class - he was so boring. He often kept us over 3 hours & blamed it on us for "not speaking up." No one in the class understood anything & he didn't seem to notice. Very rude & unforgiving toward those who are struggling. Papers were harshly graded and the final was impossible. :(

3.0
5.0
ENG381
May 12, 2007

I didn't learn anything from him. He was a really tough grader. I almost fell asleep every single class - he lectures the whole time and doesn't really involve the students. There are hardly any class activities to keep it interesting. Maybe it was just that he was teaching a very boring subject, but he certainly made no attempt to make it fun.

5.0
4.0
ENG381
May 13, 2007

I loved this class. The readings were hard, but the discussions grew my brain at least two sizes. Only five students ever talked, tho.

5.0
3.0
ENG581
May 31, 2007

A very good professor--he does his best to make difficult ideas understandable for the average student. Do the reading, take copious notes, and meet with him during office hours when you need clarification. Also, make sure you don't ramble in your papers. He likes papers to be "concise" and to the point.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Jun 17, 2007

Literature & Film was one of the best courses I've taken at this university. I didn't always agree with the arguments or interpretations, but I learned so much, so much from every class. (Dr. B does teach to the above-average student, so beware of the vocabulary.)

2.0
5.0
ENG381
Sep 5, 2007

I can't believe the good comments on this page. Baybrook is not a good prof. at all. I learned absolutely nothing, even though I tried. He didn't even know our names two lectures before the final. This class was a joke - take anyone else if possible.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Sep 11, 2007

Dr. B. is funny and really very kind when you ask him for help. Anyone taking a class from him will learn truck loads, but it's 'thinking' knowledge, so I can understand why some students lose focus.

5.0
4.0
ENG381
Sep 17, 2007

Overall, he's a very conscientious teacher. I didn't know how Dr. Baybrook could get so excited about literary criticism, but whenever I made it through the reading I found myself getting caught up in the ideas, too. Dr. B is passionate. He always helps you think it through. He's not quite my favorite professor, but he's one of the best I've had.

5.0
3.0
ENG318
Jun 7, 2008

Dr. Baybrook is one heck of a character. Very funny and gets lost in his own conversations with himself. We didn't write any papers longer than a few paragraphs. He demands concise statements more than pages of fluff. Take him just to be entertained!

5.0
5.0
LS200
Jun 22, 2008

Prof. Baybrook is fascinating and friendly. I really enjoyed the class.

5.0
3.0
ENG314
Sep 28, 2008

Professor Baybrook is the coolest dude around. I might not get an A, but he's already one of my favorite profs here. I can't believe anyone would mistake his humor for something negative. He's always upbeat, and he's the smartest guy I know.

3.0
2.0
ENG318
Dec 19, 2008

Hes a knowlegable person, however, this particular class seemed completely useless.

4.0
5.0
ENG381
May 16, 2009

Baybrook is one smart guy. Passionate about all of his work, which covers many different areas (theory, American lit, history, film, etc). Not always readily available, but he's very personable outside of the classroom. However, he's rather tough, and you'll feel the heat if you don't study! I liked him enough that I didn't want to let him down.

1.0
5.0
WBIS188
May 22, 2009

So far the worst professor I have ever had. He told me to email him my paper for him to read and he never emailed me back. His class was both a waste of time and money. Also, he is the only one laughing at his jokes. He also only responds to you if you call him Dr., not professor. Clearly the guy is a tool.

5.0
4.0
WBIS188
May 31, 2009

He was very conscientious in class and always responded to my questions. Two thumbs up.

5.0
5.0
ENG318
Jun 4, 2009

Dr. Baybrook is funny and very smart, and he always helped me whenever I needed it. I know he teases students, but I never found him to be mean. He just expects students to do their best.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Jun 11, 2009

dr. baybrook is the best prof. i've had. he's definitely a thinker, tho. so leave the b.s. at the door! his style is pretty laid back, tho. he'll walk you thru an idea sort of from the inside out and show you all the little connections along the way, until you see it as one big idea - which then connects to bigger ideas. ouch. but i like it!

5.0
2.0
WBIS188
Dec 18, 2009

Great professor, knows his stuff. His methods are a little different, but you will learn a lot from this class. Also doesn't give 'busy' work like other teachers do, just gets to the point and lets you learn however much you want to.

5.0
4.0
WBIS188
Dec 31, 2009

Coolest professor around, who focuses on the big stuff, but you can't expect a gimme for a grade. As another student wrote, there's very little "busy work." I'd add that the short assignments--which force students to concentrate on writing, not on filling up pages--improved my writing so much that I finally feel able to write college-level essays.

5.0
4.0
ENG381
Jul 12, 2010

Well, he wrote on my paper "Don't try to sound smart; be smart," and I got mad. ("I am smart!") When I asked him about it, he said that he had tried the same thing, until a professor thumped him: "careful reasoning, not pretentious verbiage, makes you smart." The words stuck. My ego took a hit, but my writing got better.

5.0
5.0
ENG581
Aug 28, 2010

I've taken two graduate courses from Professor Baybrook (Literary Criticism and American Poetry), and I can say that, for my money, he is very, very good. He's a careful, original thinker, and yet he walks students through ideas point by point, applying them concretely along the way. I'm headed to a PhD program now.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Jan 19, 2011

Best film class I've ever taken. We learned how to read films as "films," not just as advertisements for ideas. And then we read some poetry and other literature for comparison. I finally understand what "art" means: it's different for each form. Rocked my world.

1.0
5.0
ENGL381
Jan 6, 2012

Unfair. Not good. Very smart, but not teacher material.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Jan 10, 2012

I thought he was tops. One of my favorites. He made very big ideas easy to understand without dumbing them down.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Feb 13, 2012

Solid. Good guy. Funny. A little quirky. He'll push you.

5.0
2.0
WBIS198
Apr 16, 2012

Loren's awsome, funny and super smart.

1.0
5.0
ENG231
Dec 10, 2012

Didnt give a grade until after the drop deadline and then the class average was a D. One test, one 15 minutes presentation, one paper. Spends the entire class trying to prove to everybody how smart he is and how well he can read and write. Grades you on a scale where he is the a and everyone is not good enough and he will let you know that too.

4.0
3.0
ENG231
Dec 10, 2012

I thought he was a pretty good fun guy. Yeah, it's only 3 graded assignments with each worth 33% each of your grade. If you go to class and listen, its not so intimidating. I liked him and I think he's someone you'll like as long as you go to class, listen, and read the reviews he gives out. :)

5.0
2.0
ENG231
Dec 13, 2012

Best professor ever!

1.0
5.0
ENG231
Jan 21, 2013

By far the worst professor I have taken. The only reason I took this course was to fill up humanity. For being a 200 level class, this is very hard. There was no structure to it and he graded us like this was a 300 level course. If you are only taking this course for a humanity DO NOT TAKE IT!

3.0
4.0
ENG318
Feb 8, 2013

Terrible professor. Took it in the summer and hated it. Focused on grammar for the first two weeks and then 3 "papers" at the end of the semester with one graded final, so you never know your grade until its the final grade. He grades unfairly and I went in for help every other day.

5.0
3.0
ENG381581
Apr 14, 2013

I took this class last year and was impressed. What kept me in the game was following the readings and the discussions well enough to ask a good question now and then. I saw some other students drifting off, and they tanked. Duh. Treat the class like a science or philosophy course, and you'll succeed. (That's his background.) I learned a LOT.

5.0
2.0
ENG318
Jun 4, 2013

Incredibly useful class. We focused on very specific problems, like when a paragraph loses focus or when its examples don't work - or only barely work. And we learned how to score - and then revise - papers objectively. It was tough to get only a "5" or "6" on my paper, but I understood why...finally! Wish I'd taken this class in my first year.

2.0
4.0
ENGLISH231
Dec 11, 2013

He makes the course something it isn't intended to be: a film class. Very unhelpful. He's cocky and when you ask a question he treats you like you're dumb. He rips apart the presentations and grades very hard. Only 3 graded assignments in the entire class. The exam isn't too bad and he's really tough on the presentations. I wouldn't take him again.

2.0
4.0
ENG231
Dec 11, 2013

This class seems like it will be an easy A, but he's a very hard grader and every time you go in for help he'll rip you apart. He's very cocky and is set on his ideas. If you take this class make sure you can hold an argument. I would recommend NOT to take this class; if you can take another class do it!!!

1.0
5.0
ENG231
Dec 16, 2013

Do not take this class if you just need a humanities credit!!! Hardest grader I have ever had even when you follow his exact guidelines. Very condescending and harsh. Least favorite professor I've had so far in college.

1.0
5.0
ENG231
Dec 18, 2013

Has 3 graded items for entire class, and none of them are graded until end of semester. Incredibly difficult to please and the instructions are verbal and never the same twice. Very rude to most all of the students and basically demands you accept his "generally accepted" viewpoint on films as gospel. He would be funny if he wasn't grading you.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Grade: B+
Dec 22, 2013

I loved this course. It was really interesting, and the professor was very kind and helpful.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Dec 22, 2013

ENG 231 was an intense and rewarding class. It blew me away. Professor B helped me see movies and literature in a whole new way. I can't say enough about how good the course was. But it wasn't a no-brainer, as some students (below) seem to have expected.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Dec 28, 2013

Best film course I have ever taken.

1.0
5.0
ENG231
Jan 14, 2014

The most ridiculous grading I have ever witnessed in all of my years in education. Obfuscated the entire thing in a manner to which he could easily manipulate the grading at the last possible moments and leave the student no recourse. "Plays the game" well. Grades based on his opinion of you as a person, more so than your actual educational works.

1.0
5.0
ENG231
Jan 14, 2014

Made the most awkward comments. If you go for a grade be prepared for a shakespeare reading to break out.

2.0
5.0
ENG231
Jan 14, 2014

Worst film class I have ever taken.

5.0
2.0
ENG231
Jan 29, 2014

I found Professor Baybrook to be really generous and kind. There was one student in the class who kept getting angry at everything, kind of paranoid-like. But the class mostly ignored him. Baybrook was too gentle, I thought. But I think the angry student is back, here on this site. Well, my friends and I LOVED the class.

5.0
2.0
ENG231
Jan 29, 2014

Wow, that guy below must be the same grumpy dude I remember from class, too. Seriously, Professor Baybrook should get an award for how good he was! He really helped me and my roommate with our presentations. He even arranged to meet with me outside office hours to help me with my paper, which was a mess before that. REALLY GOOD.

5.0
5.0
ENG231
Jan 31, 2014

I worked harder than I ever have! Baybrook asked us to perform at a "national" standard. It felt SO good not to feel like I'd been dropped off at some "local" university. I got an A because I had earned it, and I knew I could earn that A anywhere else! He did enjoy teasing us, though--but it was always good-natured.

5.0
4.0
ENG231
Feb 1, 2014

Prof. Baybrook was phenomenal. He's truly engaging and I thought very sensitive to students. I changed my presentation topic twice and he helped me every time. The course is hard though, but that's because it's so good - intense. Get me a camera! I want to make movies now! :-)

5.0
5.0
ENG231
Feb 20, 2014

As a junior, I've taken some "hard" courses already, but my GPA is 3.7. Prof. Baybrook was hard in the best sense: he made me an even better student through hard work - his and mine. I loved thinking through almost every film with him. It was intense and mind-blowing. He has real focus and passion, but he loves to hear what students think. Take it!

5.0
4.0
ENG381
Mar 22, 2014

Stunningly good.

5.0
5.0
ENG381
Apr 4, 2014

Loren is the best. I love his enthusiasm, and it's so refreshing to take a class with a professor who knows a subject so deeply that he can be clear!

2.0
5.0
ENG318
Apr 9, 2014

Professor was ridiculously hard and did not really help when asking for advice. He had his own way of thinking and that was it. He did help improve my writing to an extent. You MUST attend class. I worked harder then any class I have ever had and only got a C+. That's after meeting with him almost every class.

5.0
2.0
ENG318
May 12, 2014

Dr. Baybrook has met with me almost every time I've come by his office, and he's explained the scoring really clearly, so I know why I'm getting a B-. I'm not happy about my performance, but I also don't ace my chemistry exams. Dr. B really helped me do my best.

1.0
4.0
ENG318
May 14, 2014

instead of teaching advanced science comp he thought we should all be calibrated to AP writing. This was not only useless for a class but he did not give any grades on the papers till the semester was done. If we couldn't make his office hours we then had to go to his office at Lawrence University. He was confusing, and difficult

5.0
4.0
ENG318
May 20, 2014

I know I earned my A-, and it's very satisfying! Dr. B is the BEST professor I've had here at UWO!

5.0
5.0
ENG318
Grade: C
May 20, 2014

I thought my grade would be lower, but I earned a solid B+. Honestly, I'm so glad now that I took this class from Professor Baybrook. He was very demanding, but, wow, did it improve my writing--and my thinking! Whiners, beware! You might learn more than you're willing to admit!

5.0
4.0
ENG318
May 21, 2014

I really liked him, but I can see how some people might not. He's sincere, and he's painfully smart. The AP scale was actually a good approach because it was an objective standard that we all could understand. It felt very scientific, even though the papers themselves required a lot of imagination to write. Nice combo!

5.0
5.0
ENG318
May 23, 2014

Dr. B was VERY helpful. He was also VERY challenging, VERY precise. But Dr. B had a great sense of humor and sense of perspective, which was a relief. Big problems (dumb claims or bad evidence) were big. Small problems (comma splice or a misspelling) were small. I'm a chemistry major, so that's *exactly* what I think a professor should be.

1.0
3.0
ENGLISH318
Jun 1, 2014

Very subjective grading and unkind to students who asked legitimate questions during class (I am assuming he felt defensive). Talked down to students and very disrespectful and unprofessional to students and community members "who aspire for nothing more than a minimum wage job". I strongly recommend a different professor if possible.

5.0
2.0
ENG318
Jun 2, 2014

I love Dr. B's approach! He's the *least* subjective grader I've ever had. It's such a relief, except when the objective grade is lower than I want. But it's real. And even then he's always looking for ways to help me write better.

5.0
3.0
ENG318
Jun 9, 2014

This class was intense. I have never worked on writing like this. Professor Baybrook makes you look at a paragraph as a "unit" in the essay. So prepare to talk about how good your "claim" is and how good your "evidence" is at that level and on up. I learned more in this class than I did in any other writing class I've taken. Nice guy, too.

2.0
5.0
231
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 10, 2014

Omg, don't take this class! There is nothing more boring that hearing him review text and movies. You will not be reading an entire book, or watching an entire movies. He takes clips from movies and passages from poems and movies and attempts to compare them. One paper, a presentation, class participation and a final are what you are graded on.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Grade: A
Dec 31, 2014

We got to choose films and poems from the syllabus for our exam essays, so I got to write on the ones I really liked. We had to do the Shakespeare selection, but his lecture on Romeo and Juliet blew my mind, so writing on that one was actually easy. Great lectures. Films will never be the same to me again.

1.0
5.0
AMLIT
Grade: B
Jan 28, 2015

HE truly doesn't care for students

5.0
1.0
ENG300
Apr 2, 2015

Easiest class I've literally ever taken. The assignments are all completion except for our final paper which is like 30% of our grade or something. He's cancelled like half of our classes and he gets funnier throughout the semester. Sometimes he's hard to listen to but he really cares about each student individually.

5.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: A+
Apr 13, 2015

My mind has officially been opened. He asks you to think and write with serious intensity, but the assignments are short, so they SEEM easy, and he explains everything so well that you THINK you're the master. Until you write. Then you see how hard writing WELL actually is. But I LOVE this weird class. I'm actually learning something.

3.0
4.0
ENG381
Grade: C
May 14, 2015

I don't really know what to say about this guy. He wasn't awful, but on occasion, it was difficult to tell if he was being pompous or if he was joking. Also, he's a philosopher. If you're into decoding, try his lectures on for size! He IS insanely smart, very serious (I think), and doesn't post grades.

5.0
2.0
ENG381
May 18, 2015

Dr. B helped us through some tough readings. Who knew that Aristotle could be THAT interesting? And who knew that a guy joking with us so often (but never getting too chummy) could also be explaining the material THAT well? Dr. B has to be the BEST prof I've had in this English program.

4.0
3.0
ENGLISH300
May 18, 2015

I love this guy!

5.0
4.0
ENG312
Jun 7, 2015

This was an incredibly useful class. I learned more about writing in three weeks than I ever learned in high school and other colleges classes combined. In fact, I wish I could take it again just to digest it all.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Grade: A-
Jun 24, 2015

Good professor, good class. Loved his lecture on Aristotle.

3.0
3.0
ENG300
Grade: A-
Feb 19, 2016

I like how the class was set-up (a lot of peer-editing), but he was definitely confusing when giving directions about papers. He is a nice guy but is kind of a tough grader. And you don't get any grades until the semester is over, so you don't know what to expect. He does let you come in to office hours and he will read your papers.

5.0
3.0
ENG300
Grade: B+
Mar 1, 2016

Grading happens soon, and you get a lot of help/feedback from the professor any time you want, but he gives you the chance to revise until the end of the semester. That's a huge help. I started out writing at a C+ but then was able to improve to a B+. I could have locked in the grade at the C+ early on, but why do that? The point is to improve!

5.0
1.0
ENG381
Apr 3, 2016

This is the best professor I've had. Ever. Period.

5.0
1.0
ENG381
Apr 12, 2016

One of the better English courses I've taken, and Professor Baybrook is truly riveting.

5.0
1.0
ENG381
Apr 22, 2016

Yep, best prof I've had. Can't believe I now like writers like Aristotle and Mulvey. Teaches Frost like a poet. Just awesome.

5.0
2.0
ENG381
Grade: A-
May 29, 2016
Would take again

The lectures use up the period, but they're more like question/answer discussions. I really liked this class, and Professor Baybrook was as funny as he was smart. It was a lot of fun. But I think I paid attention more than some students did, so maybe I was just more into the "literary theory" questions. The literary segments were awesome, too, tho.

5.0
2.0
ENG381581
Grade: A-
Jun 8, 2016
Would take again

Fantastic class. I love this professor.

5.0
3.0
ENG231
Grade: A
Jun 17, 2016
Would take again

Professor Baybrook rocks it. He is SO smart and funny and sweet. Ask him anything and he'll explain it in really simple terms. Best class I've had.

1.0
5.0
ENG381
Grade: C+
Jul 7, 2016
Wouldn't take again

His lectures are long, there are no actual grade assignments except for the final 2-day long exam. We covered 25 critics in the semester and it was impossible to keep it all straight for the final. He tells you one thing about the grading and does a completely different other. He is the worst professor I've ever had. Wouldn't recommend at all.

1.0
4.0
ENG381
Grade: B-
Jul 8, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Professor Baybrook humiliates his students if they don't show the same interpretation as him. Doesn't have a clear grading scale and is vague when you ask questions. Don't expect to know what your grade is because he wont tell you specially and is sketchy with grades on the syllabus.

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Jul 22, 2016
Would take again

I remember two students who couldn't read--I mean they could not READ. I was really embarrassed for them. Prof. Baybrook tried to help them through the passage. But they just couldn't read English. And this was a course for majors! I had a hard time with understanding a reading, and he explained it for me in super easy terms. But I can read! LOL

5.0
2.0
ENG231
Dec 5, 2016
Would take again

This is a smart and very kind professor. He joked a lot with us, and after the first assignment I thought I might get a bad grade overall, but in the end he didn't grade hard at all. The real reason to take Prof Baybrook is that the lectures and discussions are just so interesting, although sometimes a tad long. One of my favorite professors.

Inspirational
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
4.0
ENG300
May 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

The grade you receive in this class is based off of 3 papers that are all due last day of the semester. Also, the class only meets for the first half of the semester so the second half it is hard to get feedback and help. Very hard grader and hard class. Syllabus states lowest grade you can get is a 'C'; does not follow through with that statement

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
1.0
ENG300
Grade: C
May 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

I tried to find him during his office hour to proof read my paper. At least five times I looked for him both places he was not there. One time I set up an appointment but I ended and to go to hospital so that was my bad. His email feedback was not clear at all and not helpful either. I never understood why or what I should change in my paper

Tough Grader
1.0
5.0
ENG300
Grade: B+
Jun 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Baybrook thinks he has the best intentions for his students but he's only making their life more difficult. Baybrook follows a very broad teaching style in which he wants his students to learn for themselves. Your entire grade is based of 3 papers that you'll get little-to-no feedback on. It's difficult to care when the professor doesn't care.

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
ENG300
Aug 10, 2017
Would take again

I learned a LOT, so I'm happy. Very good professor - and very nice.

5.0
3.0
ENG300
Grade: B+
Aug 14, 2017
Would take again

Baybrook was helpful. I got a B+. Yeah, I learned a lot, too. Just wish my writing could improve at the same rate!

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENG231
Aug 20, 2017
Would take again

Really liked this class. Really. Is it weird to say it changed my life?

Inspirational
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENG300
Dec 18, 2017
Would take again

I thought Baybrook wanted us to understand college, so he asked a lot of questions. They made me think pretty hard. But he was always kind, and he supported everyone who attended class. I learned a ton. It was amazing. A lot of people dropped off the grid after the first lectures, so maybe they felt overwhelmed. Great class/professor for me.

Amazing lectures
Caring
Would take again
5.0
3.0
ENG300
Dec 21, 2017
Would take again

He doesnt require attendance, so a lot of students dont show up after the first few classes. Not too bright! Dr. B teaches really practical stuff. Its not just political junk. What a relief! Profs can get so preachy, especially in English classes, but Dr. B keeps it grounded. Very, very good class - if you showed up!

Hilarious
Amazing lectures
Would take again
5.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: A
Dec 22, 2017
Would take again

An incredibly brilliant professor. I came in as a Chem major, so didn't expect to get much out of this. However, Dr. B helped me realize some of the most important lessons I've ever learned in my education. He helped me just enough to give me a chance to figure it out on my own which I appreciated. I loved the challenge this class gave me. Take him

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
2.0
ENG300
Grade: B+
May 10, 2018
Would take again

Attendance isn't mandatory, he's very clear about the papers and has you turn them all in through an email at the end of the semester. Continuously sent out emails to make sure that we were all on the same page and that we'd get at least a C for just writing the papers.

Gives good feedback
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: B
May 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT TAKE HIM. Says class is optional, then later says it'll impact your grade. Barely gives his feedback in class, and has your classmates evaluate your papers the second half of the semester... waste of time. But then you try to see him at office hours? He'll give you enough help to pass but nothing more. Said I'd get an A, then gave me a B.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
SO MANY PAPERS
5.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: B
May 17, 2018
Would take again

One of the best professors Ive had, even though I got a B. Of course, he warned us that the average grade was a C. Uses the AP scale, which I really liked, because I knew exactly where my writing was scoring the whole way thru.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Inspirational
1.0
4.0
ENG300
May 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Every paper is due at the end of the semester which is great for some but rough for procrastinators. His instructions for the papers are not clear and very vague. His attendance is optional for a reason. His lessons are absolute bs made to fill time. Take anybody else if you can.

5.0
3.0
ENG300
May 23, 2018
Would take again

I loved the lectures! Mainly because he didn't treat them as lectures. They were more like deep explanations of simple writing principles. They made SENSE. Finally! I learned SO much through the conferences, where I could work on my paper one on one. Seriously, he was the most helpful professor I've ever had. But he definitely told it like it is.

Inspirational
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENG300
Jun 9, 2018
Would take again

My favorite professor of all time. Period.

2.0
5.0
ENG231
Grade: C-
Aug 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He is a very tough grader, almost to the point of questionability. I was uncertain about why I received certain grades and his feedback was trivial. I put a lot of work into the final presentation and only got a C. I am a fabulous paper writer, but not up to his own standards, apparently, as I finished the course with a lackluster grade.

5.0
3.0
ENG312
Grade: B+
Aug 22, 2018
Would take again

I liked the way he trained us to score our own essays. I got pretty good at it, so I could understand the difference between 'big' and 'small' revisions. Scoring an 8 or 9 was tough, yes, but I got why it was hard, in the way I get why it's hard to get an A in calculus. I think I respect Dr. B more than most professors I've had. He's also sweet.

2.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: B-
Sep 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Gives no clear instruction. Does not require you to come to class, but if you do go he gives you long and hard writing assignments that do not count toward your grade. Gives no feedback on papers because everything is turned it at the end of the semester, so all semester you are clueless as to what your grade is. Hard to reach about office hours.

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
ENG300LEVEL
Sep 8, 2018
Would take again

I loved the flexibility of the class, and Dr. B was always ready to help me. By the time I turned in my papers at the end, he had given me solid feedback on all of them, but I know that some students just submitted everything at the end without ever checking with him, so I can see how they wouldn't have gotten feedback.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Caring
5.0
4.0
ENG300LEVEL
Grade: A-
Oct 8, 2018
Would take again

Here's the big lesson I've learned: Dr. Baybrook will tell you the truth about your essay in the way a math professor will tell you the truth about your calculus test. He's a professional editor. He knows the material in a way that other professors I've had just don't, and he can explain it. Like the other student said: Best professor I've had.

Gives good feedback
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
4.0
ENG300
Mar 28, 2019
Would take again

Solid - and a little shocking, cuz this prof will tell you straight - but hell show you how to fix the real (big) problems. Incredible.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Caring
3.0
4.0
ENG312
Grade: Incomplete
Apr 2, 2019
Would take again

If you are a procastinator this class will make or break you. Falling behind on the "suggested schedule" that Professor Baybrook provides is VERY tempting/easy. If you enjoy self-discipline then by far you will like this class. Overall bringing your papers to him during office hours is a valuable endeavor if you aim at becoming a better writer.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
ENG312
May 14, 2019
Wouldn't take again

This class would be so much better if Professor Baybrook provided deadlines. This thing gets out of hand quickly as he virtually encourages students that they don't have to come to class after the first day. What you in turn get is poor peer attendance and then feeling left to your own devices unless you make a religion out of meeting during office

1.0
4.0
ENG231
Grade: Not sure yet
May 16, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Grades 3 things, a 30 minute presentation within the last few weeks of school (which he will interrupt you in the middle of to critique you and tell you youre wrong on your own interpretation or even tell you to hurry up) then a follow up essay, and an one of the hardest exams ever taken all to have none of them graded by semester end

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
ENG231
Grade: B
May 17, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Very vague with his expectation for the semester. Be warned that only three assignments dictate your whole grade for the semester; A presentation, essay, and a final. Make sure that you take notes on his lectures because he likes to drop a bomb on his class the day before that his final is actual 4 in class essays based on his lectures.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
ENG231
Jun 1, 2019
Would take again

Fantastic prof!

Inspirational
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
ENG231
Grade: A-
Jun 1, 2019
Would take again

Baybrook is like a Sweetheart candy. Once you know that there's a tart, the sweet makes sense against it. Maybe the candy should be Smart'n'Sassy. He teases a lot, but Dr. B is about the nicest professor I've known. I could tell that some students don't get his teasing, though. It was hilarious. Just a great class for me.

Graded by few things
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
5.0
ENG312
Jul 31, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He is the rudest professor I have ever had. He is so blunt, which may seem good, however, he is very disrespectful about it and really will make you feel dumb and inadequate.

Graded by few things
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
ENG300
Oct 9, 2019
Would take again

I found Dr. Baybrook to be pretty gentle, if also honest. He guided me through a rewrite of a paper I thought was doomed. *Very* helpful. But a lot of students did nothing until the end of the course and then got really panicked. Their loss, I say.

Gives good feedback
1.0
5.0
ENG312
Grade: B
Feb 17, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Get ready to re-learn how to write Baybrook style. The way he expects you to write is different from any other teacher you've had. He grades based on only a few papers very harshly, and when you ask for help he questions the whole premise of your idea (which no one likes). I was so upset while taking this class it affected my other courses as well.

Graded by few things
So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ENG312
Grade: B
Feb 17, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Effort and hard work in this class gets you nowhere. My uncle, who has his Masters degree and is an English Professor, told me my papers were exceptional, yet I still managed to get D's and F's on a few of them. He is inconsistent with grading procedures. I even attended every class and had him look over all my papers and didn't improve at all.

Graded by few things
So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ENG312
Grade: B-
Mar 9, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I am normally an A student, I spent more time on this class than i did every other class. I would go to him for feedback and would change my essays accordingly, and he would still mark everything wrong. He will tell you on the first day you dont have to come to class. My class started with 40 people and by the end only 5 people showed up for class

So many papers
Tough grader
5.0
4.0
ENG300LEVEL
Mar 26, 2020
Would take again

Best writing professor I have had. Baybrook showed me exactly why and where the reasoning or the evidence was off in my papers. I have never been shown that before. Never. It was a hard pill to swallow, but OMG did it change how I wrote. I'm an older student, so Baybrook's approach is more familiar to me, I think, than to young students.

Gives good feedback
Tough grader
4.0
1.0
ENGLISH231
Grade: A
Apr 10, 2020
Would take again

By far one of the most unique, passionate professors I've had. Made lectures engaging and personable. Class is super easy to attend and final grade is based on 1 exam, 1 presentation, and 1 essay. Not super necessary info to learn unless you want to be a film director, but good class to earn credit. Take good notes and just enjoy the discussions.

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
ENG214
May 14, 2020
Would take again

Prof. Baybrook made really difficult literature so clear that I just can't believe it's not taught this way all the time. Wow. I'm majoring in science, and I thought this class would be the usual fluff and jargon. Nope. Dr. Baybrook has a math and chemistry background, though, so maybe that explains his combo of clarity and complexity. Just great.

Accessible outside class
Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
2.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: B
May 15, 2020
Wouldn't take again

You can tell Prof. Baybrook knows what he is teaching but he does not give much instrution although he grades very tough. He will not answer emails and expects you to rely on fellow classmates in order to answer questions and learn the requirements for each assignment.

Lecture heavy
So many papers
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
ENG214
May 28, 2020
Would take again

My best professor this whole year was easily Dr. Baybrook. His class was such an intense experience. I've never learned literature like this. It felt like one of those great TED Talks. He made poems and stories so relatable but so bizarre and wonderful that I almost cried a few times during class discussion. yah, yah. embarrassing but true.

Amazing lectures
1.0
4.0
ENG300
Grade: C+
Oct 26, 2020
Wouldn't take again

He believes most papers are C's

Graded by few things
Tough grader
1.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: Incomplete
Nov 10, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The class was supposed to be synch on Tues but he changed it to async. He regularly posts stuff in modules that we are expected to check on every day. He doesn't post assignments in a calendar, he puts them in a module. You can't look ahead. His lectures are very vague, not sure what we are even learning. He doesn't understand how students operate.

1.0
2.0
WRT288
Dec 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

If you are hoping to know what your grade will be in this class, you won't know until grades are due at the end of the semester. He moved this class to asynchronous, takes forever to email back, and when he does he's not very helpful. Just makes a announcement or discussion post about what needs to be done for the week. You won't actually learn.

Tough grader
1.0
4.0
WRT288
Grade: B-
Dec 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Completely asynchronous which would have been fine, but he didn't even make lecture videos. Did not have clear due dates and would not announce when weekly assignments were posted. Did not have any grades put in during the semester and could not ask how we were doing throughout the semester. Huge waste of time and money.

5.0
3.0
231LITFILM
Jan 4, 2021
Would take again

Because the class was online this term, attendance was required, but he gave us the whole week for every assignment, so I really liked that freedom. I also liked the lectures. Yes, I wish we had met in person sometimes, but I also liked being able to do the stuff at my own pace. I emailed him a couple times for help, and his feedback helped a lot.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
3.0
ENG231
Grade: C+
Jan 12, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Horrible. Absolutely awful professor. Will not grade anything until classes are over Very cocky during his lectures. No clear due dates on discussion boards and didn't post one lecture video I am a great student and did horribly in his class. I would NEVER take him again. I want my money back.

Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
ENG381
Jan 26, 2021
Wouldn't take again

So first off for online "lectures" he uses speech to text, and doesn't proof read after he is done talking and just uploads it. He is the cockiest teacher I have ever had the displeasure of taking. Never gave deadlines, just said to have discussions done by the end of the year, then closes the chat rooms at random. Does not respond fast to email.

1.0
4.0
ENG381
Jan 26, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Perfect example of professor being knowledgeable on topic, but not knowing how to teach. Brags about how papers he grades won't be above a C, and hardly responds to emails. Class was not laid out right, lots of students have complained about this prof in the past to the school and nothing has been done about him. Don't waste your money.

Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
WRT288
May 2, 2021
Would take again

Okay, I had Baybrook for writing class, and he was super helpful, not just "smart." Yeah, the lectures were online (because of COVID), but they were kinda fun to read, because he talked to us as if he were live. (He said he's never used voice-to-text for lectures, and that sounds right, because they were never sloppy.) Not an easy A, but fair to me

Inspirational
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
4.0
WRT288
May 14, 2021
Wouldn't take again

please do not take this professor. I am a straight-A student, and I'm not sure I even passed this class yet. I have never posted on here, but for this professor, I had to. He is the worst professor I have ever taken in my life. He provided no feedback, and I honestly learned nothing. For the love of god, do not take this class. he needs to be fired

Tough grader
5.0
3.0
ENG214
Aug 3, 2021
Would take again

I have to say that Dr. Baybrook is my favorite professor in the English department. My experience as an A student tells me that it pays to study with someone who actually knows things, knows how to do things, and knows how to teach us how to do things -- not just talk big and say nice things. I got very helpful feedback. Incredibly useful.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
ENG288
Aug 10, 2021
Would take again

He doesn't hold your hand, but he teaches real material, not just politically correct mush. He uses the AP standard cuz he's a supervisor, so I learned what I actually needed. It could be super frustrating to find out that my argument wasn't working--but I'd rather know the truth and learn how to fix the problem than be lied to. Seriously good.

Gives good feedback
Graded by few things
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
ENG381581
Aug 22, 2021
Would take again

I enjoyed the style and substance of this class tremendously. Dr. Baybrook is simply great.

Graded by few things
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
5.0
ENG300
Oct 18, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Ive had many friends take English 300 and by far this has been the worst professor. He will break apart a great written essay and will pick at the littlest things making you fail almost every essay. Not sure he understands that he is teaching a mandatory class not people that want the have a PHD in writing. DONT TAKE

5.0
3.0
ENG381
Nov 18, 2021
Would take again

Dr. Baybrook is one of my favorite professors of all time. No, he's not "easy," but he's more helpful and more caring than a truckload of lesser profs. Most of all, he grades accurately. I know why a grade is what it is -- and it makes sense. This is what college is supposed to be: real learning. Some if my friends hate his "accuracy." Their loss.

Gives good feedback
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
2.0
ENG300
Grade: A-
Dec 14, 2021
Would take again

Got no idea why anyone would think this prof is "hard." He gives us an 'A' on every essay -- if we just don't b.s. or plagiarize ("good faith effort"). Works just FINE for me. Probably gotten more good advice in this class than I ever did in any other writing class. I've learned REAL stuff. Dude is funny, too. One of the best profs I've had.

Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
3.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 12, 2022

He is an okay professor. He cancels class a lot and just has a small canvas discussion. His assignment descriptions are super long that you get lost on what he wants you to do. Every class period he has daily words that people get confused of and you have to write them correctly in sentences. Second, so far all we talked about in class was clauses

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
ENG288
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 28, 2022

The laziest professor I've ever had. He cancels class all the time and didn't grade anything we did the entire semester till the last day. Everything we did in the class is supposed to be turned in at the end of the semester which is annoying. I learned absolutely nothing, and I hope I don't fail the class since I have no idea how he grades.

3.0
3.0
English226
Grade: A
May 5, 2022
Would take again

Professor Baybrook is definitely the most unique professor I have ever had. He doesn't even use canvas, so the grading system is very sketchy, and you don't actually find out your grade until the end of the semester. His lectures are very interesting. The way he breaks down the poem that we read is impressive. A little sexist though.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
ENG288
Grade: Not sure yet
May 10, 2022

Terrible experience. He cancels class a lot and grades everything at the end of the year, so prepared to struggle and not know how you are doing. 0/10 would not recommend.

2.0
5.0
WRT288
Grade: Rather not say
May 12, 2022

Professor baybrook canceled over half of the classes this semester. Lectures dragged on and were sometimes interesting. This professor does not know canvas well, you email him your assignments at end of semester. Assignments are blurry and he does not grade anything until the end of the semester. Talks about clauses a lot + tests you on them.

Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
WRT288
May 14, 2022
Wouldn't take again

HE IS AWFUL. I wish I was being dramatic but Im not. He doesnt teach, his lectures are just fillers. I have never failed a class until now, and Im a nursing major. For the love of God, do not do it.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lots of homework
1.0
4.0
ENG288
Grade: Not sure yet
May 15, 2022

Worst professor ever. Unclear instructions and lectures on things you do not need to know. Teaches about what you need to know about the final once at the beginning of the semester and expects you to teach yourself outside of class. He screwed our entire class over in the end with most of the class getting 50% on the final. DO NOT TAKE HIM.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
WRT288
May 20, 2022
Would take again

Actually...this prof was inspiring to me. The guy is smart, but he knows how to explain things really clearly. He lectures a bit too long sometimes, but he's always so passionate and interesting that I found myself learning just by listening. I know some students just wanted super simple stuff, but I liked his original way of thinking.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Test heavy
1.0
4.0
WRT288
Grade: Rather not say
May 21, 2022

Baybrook canceled class way too much. Instructions are confusing. Doesn't grade any assignments until the very end of the year. Do not take a class with this guy.

Tough grader
So many papers
5.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: A-
May 21, 2022
Would take again

The grading was mostly clear, and the some classes were put online, but the lectures were fun to listen to. Dr. Baybrook helped me every time I asked.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
English226
Grade: A-
May 25, 2022
Would take again

Never have I learned literature like this. Never. I came to class every day wondering what revelations awaited me. Dr. Baybrook is the best professor I've ever had for English. I can read poems and stories in a way that I could never imagine before. Now I get why he was a student at Harvard. This class was challenging but incredible.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: B
May 30, 2022
Would take again

Dr. B helped me revise papers that were in serious trouble. I was NOT prepared for his bluntness, but he was also incredibly nice because he talked with me afterward and got my ideas and then made suggestions that saved the papers -- and yet the suggestions came from my OWN ideas. That was trippy. He listened to me -- worked with me. That was huge.

Gives good feedback
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
5.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: B
Jun 2, 2022
Would take again

Solid prof. I liked Professor Baybrook more than my other English profs because he explained the important things, and it all made sense. One of my best instructors.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
English226
Jun 4, 2022
Would take again

Yeah, I'm totally Team Baybrook. The dude changed my (academic) life. I love his mix of really good lectures and silly jokes. Never a dull moment.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Caring
5.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: A
Jun 6, 2022
Would take again

Really, Prof Baybrook is an extraordinary professor. He doesn't lecture in the typical way. No PowerPoints or handouts. But he can teach writing principles better than I've ever experienced. Even some really lazy students sitting next to me were learning - and laughing. The guy is funny...and smart (sometimes too smart?). Not easy but not hard.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
WRT288
Jun 10, 2022
Would take again

Professor Baybrook gave me good help every time i asked. i liked him a lot. He was super funny. He seemed to care about me. Prof Baybrook is one of my true favorites.

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
Respected
5.0
3.0
231LITFILM
Grade: A
Jun 13, 2022
Would take again

I've always been a good student, but I was going through a hard time when I took Lit & Film from Professor Baybrook, and he was the most concerned and considerate professors I had. I also remember his Romeo and Juliet lecture on the play and two films. It just stuck with me. I wanted to take more classes from him, but I was graduating.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
4.0
231LITFILM
Grade: B+
Jun 16, 2022
Would take again

Not easy to earn a high grade in this class, but I loved Prof. Baybrook anyway. SO smart. Scary. I wish we had been given a little more time to practice our film presentations with each other before doing them in class, because I was really nervous. but I did fairly well anyway. So...maybe it was fine. Anyway. He is passionate about film studies!

Amazing lectures
Caring
Respected
5.0
4.0
ENG226
Grade: A-
Jun 17, 2022
Would take again

Baybrook is definitely the most interesting teacher I think I've ever had. He would rarely just explain a text and move on. He would set up a kind of scene, like a film, that would play out for us in terms of how the text was written (that's how he put it). That way of explaining how to read lit was the most fascinating thing I've ever experienced.

1.0
4.0
ENG288
Grade: B-
Jun 20, 2022

He did not read one writing essay from any student. We read each others with no direction of what is right and wrong. He tried to teach about clauses. His examples would be, "I like ice cream." He would them give us a Business Harvard Review and told us to find all the clauses. He cancelled classes every other week.

Tough grader
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: B+
Jun 26, 2022
Would take again

Um, no. I took my essays to him a lot, and he helped big time. I remember thinking that no other professor had ever explained exactly where my argument was going wrong. It had always been just "weak example" or "develop more". Dr. Baybrook told me why. Super helpful. We even looked at the clauses in my own writing to prep for the exam.

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENG231
Grade: A
Jul 23, 2022
Would take again

Professor Baybrook is one of the best. He's quirky, funny, and really helpful. My project was going okay, and then Prof Baybrook gave me feedback and improved it dramatically. That's how I earned an A.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
ENG214
Grade: A
Jul 28, 2022
Would take again

This is certainly one of the smartest professors I've ever had for a class, but Dr. B doesn't talk like an egghead. He talks in simple terms that get complex because of the literature, not because of his style. That was a huge lesson to me, because I want to teach, and his approach makes the most sense. Truly excellent.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Respected
5.0
4.0
ENG231
Grade: A
Aug 7, 2022
Would take again

I'm not sure if Professor Baybrook is the best professor I've ever had, but he is definitely *one* of the best. I worked really hard for my A, but I think he worked just as hard to get me there, especially with my film-analysis presentation. Film Studies isn't even my major. Loren's Lit & Film is easily the best *non-majors* course I've taken.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Caring
1.0
4.0
ENG288
Grade: C+
Sep 9, 2022

He did not have a grade for me before the end of class. The final and final essay were the only grades in the entire class. The Final exam's test average was less than 50%

Tough grader
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
ENG288
Grade: A-
Sep 14, 2022
Would take again

Nah. We were graded 60% from a portfolio of revised essays (and we got full credit--very cool!), 20% from a research essay, and 20% from a final exam (I got an 86%, but a friend of mine got a 93%). Some of the grammar stuff was boring, but when I asked for help on my essays the dude helped me a bunch. Best sense of humor in class--and wicked smart.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
ENG214
Oct 15, 2022
Would take again

Professor Baybrook is tempting me to change my major. I'm in history, but his class is SO interesting that I might want to do literature instead. We don't rush through bunches of texts. We just read "well". That is SO much more useful to me. Dude has passion...and smarts. He's really nice, but also serious (between jokes). Just great.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
231LITFILM
Grade: A
Nov 11, 2022
Would take again

Professor Baybrook uses a really approachable style and jokes with us, but the dude goes deep when it's deep. I'm always a little giddy after class. It's probably the best general-education course I've taken.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
2.0
231LITFILM
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2022
Would take again

One of the nicest and smartest profs I've had.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENG214
Grade: B+
Feb 24, 2023
Would take again

Prof Baybrook is one of my faves. We didn't get heavy reading assignments, but we read carefully. It was actually fascinating. Literature was strange to me, but now I get it. I'm not changing my major, but I LIKE literature now. High school English was lousy. This class changed my whole view. Really incredible. Good prof? I'd say GREAT PROF.

Inspirational
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
231LITFILM
Grade: A
Mar 5, 2023
Would take again

Dr. Baybrook is the best professor I've had outside my major (Psychology). He's definitely the best English professor I've ever had.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Caring
1.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: A
Apr 13, 2023

Absolutely do not take this professor. He doesn't explain material clearly and goes on rants that are not relevant to the topic. He cancels class half the time and has you do "canvas periods" which was just busywork about topics that weren't even writing/literature related. You don't get your grade until the end of the semester too.

5.0
2.0
WRT288
Apr 13, 2023
Would take again

I love the Canvas Periods. They're really interesting, though sometimes long. And I know my grade: A. That's what I earn if I just do the work!

Hilarious
Caring
Respected
5.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: A
Apr 17, 2023
Would take again

I really like Dr. Baybrook. He explains things incredibly well. He also gives us activities that we can work on at our own pace. That's sooo helpful. Plus, he's one of the nicest professors I've had. Mostly, I just feel supported. I had a problem with two assignments, and he was very understanding and helped me work through them.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
2.0
3.0
231LITFILM
Grade: Not sure yet
May 2, 2023

Very confusing professor to learn from. The class met in person half of the time and canvas the rest. No grades are available anywhere. Just have to hope you are doing well. Lectures are very confusing and not easy to follow. Confused about what the point of this class was. He is a very smart guy, but translating that in class is almost impossible.

Caring
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
ENG231
Grade: A-
May 3, 2023
Would take again

I had never thought about literature or film in such interesting ways. This was one of my faves.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
2.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: Rather not say
May 7, 2023

Very "whimsical" to say the least. Goes on very irrelevant tangents, and expectations for discussion posts and research essays are unclear. Online classes are one of two days of the week to complete discussion posts. Be aware that his explanations are hard to follow. In-class activities are fun.

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
1.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: Not sure yet
May 11, 2023
Would take again

Prof Baybrook was one of the most unorganized professors I've ever had. He has not put in a single grade all semester, and every in person class is pointless to attend and very redundant. However, he does not make attendance mandatory and each week we have a class period where we do not meet in person. Overall very easy class, but very boring.

5.0
2.0
ENG288
Grade: A
May 14, 2023
Would take again

Prof Baybrook teaches basic skills, which don't seem "advanced" until you realize how useful they are...and how hard it is to master them! Overall, he's a really good professor.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Hilarious
1.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: Audit/No Grade
May 16, 2023

He was horrible and did not teach anything.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: A
May 18, 2023
Would take again

I have to say that my experience was great. I loved the self-paced Canvas Periods, and I learned fantastic lessons about writing, from how to tell similar words apart to how to build a paragraph. It was the most valuable English class I've taken here.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: A
May 19, 2023
Would take again

Same here. I finally got clear and accurate lessons in simple but very useful language problems: punctuation, clauses, claims and evidence, sense of audience, logic. And he taught me a lot of deeper lessons about how language shapes our perceptions. This course meant a lot to me because I need this stuff in my career.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
5.0
4.0
ENG231
Grade: A
May 22, 2023
Would take again

I LOVED this class. But I worked hard. I saw other students phoning it in, and I got worried, because two of them are friends of mine, and I know they expected to get good grades. When they told me their grades, they were MAD. I was relieved, however, cuz I knew Dr. Baybrook hadn't just dished out high grades like some profs do to get good evals.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
231LITFILM
May 26, 2023
Would take again

Fun professor. Great class.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
AMLIT
Grade: A
May 29, 2023
Would take again

Not the easiest professor, but maybe the smartest I've had in literature. I'm an English major, and Baybrook teaches poetry and fiction like no one else I've known. He's definitely quirky. But follow his arguments. He taught math in another life, I guess, and he has that kind of mind: problem-solving. But there's a poet in there, too. He's great.

5.0
3.0
231LITFILM
Grade: A
Jun 9, 2023
Would take again

I absolutely loved Professor Baybrook. He's not the warm and fuzzy type, so don't go in looking for a teddy bear. Baybrook is kind and understanding, but as soon as we started I knew this was a real class, not because he had charts and powerpoints but because he was smart and he knew how to make us smart. So get in and stay awake.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
3.0
WRT288
Jun 13, 2023
Would take again

I like this class already. The assignments are straightforward and practical. It's actual reading and writing, not liberal or conservetive rants. I can't tell you how many humanities classes I've taken that are just political indoctrination dressed up as "advanced" education. This class is a breath of fresh air. I love it.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
5.0
2.0
ENG288
Jul 31, 2023
Would take again

Great class. Fascinating lectures. Not hard to earn an A.

5.0
3.0
ENG226
Grade: A
Oct 31, 2023
Would take again

Prof. Baybrook is one of those teachers who think *with* the students through an issue. He doesn't just talk at us. His energy level always gets me excited to find out what the day will bring, but his insights -- not just into literature, art, and history, but into how people feel their way through ideas (that's how he puts it) -- surprise me. Wow.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Caring
1.0
2.0
WRT288
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 30, 2023

Assignment expectations are vague, but he will ridicule you if you don't meet his expectations. I learned nothing in this class, all of our assignments were discussion posts and all of the lectures consisted of long, irrelevant tangents that could have been condensed into two or three sentences. He can be rude and abrasive at times.

Participation matters
5.0
3.0
AMLIT
Grade: A
Dec 2, 2023
Would take again

Even though a medical issue required a change in the class format, Prof Baybrook kept it all really interesting and interactive and helped out whenever my friend and I asked for help. It has been an amazing course.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Caring
5.0
2.0
ENG288
Grade: A
Dec 4, 2023
Would take again

This is the best prof I've had for English. Dr. Baybrook made the most of the asynchronous format (the lectures are funny and the activities are fun), but he was sooo understanding when I ran into trouble with a person issue. I wish Dr. B had been my teacher for the other English courses I took. Truly excellent.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
5.0
WRT288
Grade: B+
Dec 28, 2023

Stated if you did every assignment, you would get an A. Would not resolve the issue. Horribly rude and will not provide you with any information. You won't know your grade until after the semester is over and is very hard to reach. Learned nothing, class was online with long discussion boards. Do not take this class for your own sanity.

5.0
3.0
ENG226
Grade: A-
Jan 30, 2024
Would take again

I'll really miss this class. Great professor. He taught us how to figure out complex issues by reading patiently and imaginatively.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Inspirational
5.0
3.0
ENG288
Grade: A-
Feb 2, 2024
Would take again

Professor Baybrook explained why my writing wasn't rising to the top, and it's the first time a professor has actually helped me deepen an argument, instead of just saying "do more." He didn't feed me answers or anything. He just asked questions that pinpointed the problems in my writing. It was incredible. I highly recommend this professor.

Inspirational
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENG101
Grade: A
Apr 1, 2024
Would take again

Positively one of the best professors I've had. Dr. Baybrook walked us through the basics of writing (from grammar to argumentation) in a way that made total sense, and my essays got better and better. I am so grateful. I needed a solid start, and he gave me that.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Caring
3.0
3.0
WRT288
Grade: B
Sep 22, 2024

Mixed bag of a class - assignments can be vague, but Prof Baybrook's teaching style works well if you engage with it. Lectures can be tangential, but unstuckstudy ai was a lifesaver for study prep.

5.0
3.0
ENG226
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2024
Would take again

We got to ask why specific choices in a poem or short story were made and what effects those choices had in the local context and in the work as a whole. I'm a little older, so I could appreciate the teaching style. Some younger students wanted just "answers." Baybrook often made us all work out the answers ourselves, but he never let us dangle.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
231LITFILM
Grade: B+
Jan 10, 2025
Would take again

I took this class thinking it would be a sort of "appreciation" course, but it was so much more. I learned about the role of women in different genres of film and literature. I learned about how some "moral" lessons can (or can't) be derived from plot and character development. I learned how to read/view for both small and big structures. Amazing.

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Inspirational
5.0
4.0
ENG226
Grade: A
Mar 30, 2025
Would take again

We read poems and portions of short stories in class to get a good feeling for how themes are built from imagery, plot, rhetoric, and characterization. Baybrook's lessons on reading Frost were mind-blowing. I didn't even know it was possible to read that accurately and that persuasively. I had thought that interpretation was all subjective. Nope.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Inspirational
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

18%

Textbook Required

30%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 77 grades
Most common grades:
A (27)
A- (14)
B+ (11)
Grade Distribution
A(28)B(15)C(8)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(25)
Based on 92 reported grades
A: 27
A-: 14
B+: 11
B: 10
Common Tags
Caring (32)
Hilarious (27)
Amazing lectures (27)
Inspirational (25)
Gives good feedback (24)
Tough grader (17)
Graded by few things (17)
Amazing lectures (14)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.29 avg change
Feb
Apr
Sep
Dec
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENG300LEVEL

5.0

(4)

ENG381581

5.0

(4)

ENG581

5.0

(3)

LS200

5.0

(1)

ENG314

5.0

(1)
+26 more courses
Difficulty by Course

231

5.0

381

5.0

ENGLISH381

5.0

ENGLISH380

5.0

ENGLISH

5.0

Similar Professors