2.0

Mahua Sarkar

Sociology - Binghamton University (SUNY)

2.0
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
23%
Would Retake
100
Reviews
2.0
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
1.9
Helpful
2.1
Clarity

23%

Would Retake

100

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

8

4

12

3

14

2

23

1

43

What Students Say

VERY rude, mean, and belittling

100B - 1.0 rating

discussion periods are for review so prepare questions

SOC100B - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

69%

Textbook Required

30%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

95% confidence
Based on 21 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
Not sure yet (4)
A- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(2)C(5)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(4)
Based on 25 reported grades
A: 7
Not sure yet: 4
A-: 3
B: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (11)
Get ready to read (11)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (7)
LECTURE HEAVY (7)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Graded by few things (4)
Tough grader (4)
Participation matters (3)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.06 avg change
Apr
May
Jun
Sep
Oct
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SOC300

5.0

(1)

CLASS01

5.0

(1)

SOC480R

4.0

(1)

SOC101

3.8

(5)

SOC278

3.0

(1)
+10 more courses
Difficulty by Course

SOC278

5.0

SOC100A

4.1

SOC480R

4.0

SOCIOLOGY100B

4.0

CLASS01

4.0

Reviews (100)
3.0
5.0
SOC278
Feb 26, 2003

People afriad to talk in class because she will make fun of students. Good teacher, but not very nice. VERY hard grader.

1.0
4.0
SOC325
Feb 27, 2003

she is unfair, unclear, unprepared, and unwilling. though you will learn some things in her class, but it is overall a waste of time.

1.0
4.0
SOC100A
Feb 27, 2003

Incredibly poor professor. I think that my calculus professor can prepare lessons better than her. She is unapproachable and she is an unfit instructor.

1.0
3.0
SOC100A
Feb 28, 2003

doesnt explain things well and very hard to understand-the ta's arent helpful either

1.0
3.0
100
Apr 15, 2003

Her accent makes things hard to understand. Tests are based on her lectures which are reinforced by the readings. Since you cant understand what she says, and talks way too fast, you have to do the readings... ta's dont help

2.0
4.0
SOC100A
May 9, 2003

I had hard time understanding exactly what this woman expected. Her lectures are poor because she rambles all over the place.

1.0
4.0
SOC100A
Jun 29, 2003

horrible prof. very bias, very nasty, people were afraid to ask questions, she gave off a clear vibe in which she did not like our country, ridiculous tests, should not be allowed to teach sociology

2.0
4.0
SOC101
Sep 8, 2003

Very biased, not helpful, only she is correct type of view

1.0
3.0
SOC
Oct 9, 2003

horrible professor. when in class, you'll learn a total of 3 new and interesting ideas that will appear on the test..rest of the stuff you have to learn on your own! ONE MIDTERM, ONE FINAL = TOTAL GRADE!

2.0
3.0
SOC101
Nov 16, 2003

sarkar is not a very nice prof at all. she doesn't enjoy teaching and her lectures are ridiculously boring. i think sociology is interesting, but i hate going to her class.

3.0
3.0
SOC100
Nov 22, 2003

has little patience with students. intimidating. but she is a very fair teacher. i don't understand why some people complain about her exams because she tells us EXACTLY what will show up on it!

2.0
3.0
SOC100
Dec 2, 2003

Class information is interesting, but readings are not.She plays alot of films which was the best part.She is not friendly and is sarcastic. You feel tense in her class and pray she wont call on you,if u have the wrong answer she will be sure to let u kno

3.0
2.0
SOC100
Dec 4, 2003

As a teacher teaching the subjects that remain unbaised, she is very good, clear, and precise. Yet, there are subjects where she is clearly biased, and she dismisses any new ideas. It is obvious she doesn't want to teach the intro course.

1.0
3.0
SOC100
Dec 10, 2003

she hates teaching, and is often hard to understand. She is extremely biased and it is pretty clear from her lectures she dislikes Americans, and if you couldnt tell from that every one of her TAs is from another country, and is equally hard to understand

4.0
3.0
SOC325
Dec 12, 2003

Well..She knows what she is talking about..but doesn't know how to explain it well. She is more helpful in person then in the classroom.

1.0
5.0
SOC100
Grade: A
Feb 29, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
SOC100
Apr 15, 2004

No Comments

3.0
1.0
SOC100
Apr 21, 2004

Easiest professor I ever had. I got an A in the course by going to lecture and that's it, I went to the discussion sections a little but I never even bought the books. Sit in the back listen and write. Everything that'll be on the test she goes over.

5.0
2.0
SOC300
May 5, 2004

people leave such **** comments. she is one of osama bin ladens many wives? she has foreign TA that dont speak english? you shouldnt be majoring in SOC anyway if you think like that. she was interesting, wasnt hard, and was straightforward abou

4.0
1.0
SOC100
Nov 17, 2004

i thought she was a good teacher and her class is easy... i never read and i still got an A

2.0
4.0
SOC262
Apr 26, 2005

This professor seems to have no interest in actually teaching, she expects you to know everything and gets angry if you can't answer her questions. She is very intimidating which makes it even worse. She also seems very anti-american and acts like she is to good for a SUNY and better than everyone

4.0
4.0
SOC480R
Sep 1, 2005

she has great wealth of knowledge about the subject at hand. She has a very tough approach to teaching, and stern on her stands, so she will cut you off if you are wrong. if you willing to do work, and think critically, this is a very good professor to have.

1.0
4.0
SOCIOLOGY100B
Sep 5, 2005

No Comments

2.0
3.0
SOC100B
Sep 14, 2005

Her accent is difficult to understand, and her lessons are a bit hard to follow. She comes off as unapproachable and she's not very helpful. She discouraged me from asking questions in class. She wasn't particularly friendly from the beginning. She also tends to interrupt students and make them feel as though their answers aren't adequate.

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Sep 21, 2005

I would not advise anyone to take this class. This woman has a very thick accent and sometimes refuses to repeat herself. She is very rude to her students. She refuses to wear her microphone so the students in the back can hear her and she stops her lesson to yell at students for smiling in the classroom. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Nov 17, 2005

This teacher might be the all time worst teacher i ever had. She has a very hard accent to understand and doesent like her students at all. She is anti-powerpoint and does not use the overhead projectors. If you are amazing at understanding a very broken Indian accent, then knock urself out. I dont know how she became a teacher.

1.0
1.0
SOC100B
Grade: B
Nov 18, 2005

Easiest class in the world. Dont bother showing up. Like everyone said, she sucks at teaching. Hates guys, freshmen, and white kids. Her tests are amazingly easy.

3.0
1.0
SOC100B
Grade: B+
Nov 18, 2005

She doesn't want to be teaching, especially not an intro level class. She is very rude, even mean, to her students, and will often stop class to yell at them. She is very unhelpful, and doesn't use powerpoint or blackboard. However, when she does get around to lecturing, it is very interesting. Also, the tests are really really easy.

1.0
3.0
SOC100B
Grade: A+
Nov 21, 2005

This lady is ridiculous, not only is she blatantly anti-american, she is also ****. She is quite unhelpful and makes you feel as though your answers are inadequate. This class is literally a joke, all she does is stand up at the podium and scream at the class for not knowing the material she ISNT teaching. The ta's are good

1.0
4.0
SOC100B
Nov 29, 2005

Worst professor I have ever had. Anti-American, anti-male, and an absolutely rude and ignorant person. Oh and just because she's anti-male dosen't mean that she's pro-female. She hates everyone, just males more. Question: Why is she teaching?

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 10, 2005

No Comments

1.0
2.0
SOC100B
Dec 12, 2005

This Professor cannot teach, even if her life depended on it. She uses the podium as a bully-pulpit form which to preach her idea of how the world should be and how the U.S is screwing it up. She is blatantly anti-male in not only her teaching style, but in her interactions with students. Stated in class final was short answer only to give essays.

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 20, 2005

its hard to understand her lectures and doesnt like to explain things. discussion is a waste of time. if ur taking this class as a gen. ed, i would recommend trying something else

1.0
3.0
SOC110
Apr 25, 2006

She is the worst teacher EVER

4.0
4.0
SOC325
Apr 27, 2006

Not easy grade, but most effective class I've ever taken. She goes off on tangents, but always covers 90% test material in class. Read & study to do well. She may come off as anti-American, but makes you think by giving perspectives than those we already know. She's fair. If you keep up with work, you have potential to get alot out of this class.

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Nov 7, 2006

Terrible Class. Horribly **** and unwilling to explain grades- all A's and final grade of C-?????? hates America & everything about it. Messes up grades, the TA sucked too. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS.

4.0
2.0
SOC100B
Dec 16, 2006

She is very opinionated and anti-American in her sentiment, but the course material is interesting if you pay attention and put the time in.

2.0
3.0
SOC100B
Oct 9, 2007

I have never had such a boring teacher. Her Anti-American views are not even interesting for those of us who come from New York City and can hear rhetoric like this by talking to friends. She is a broken record, but believes she is a novelty because she teaches to a lecture hall that is half filled with kids from WhiteButtcrack, NY.

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Nov 8, 2007

Worst teacher ever. DO NOT take any classes with her!

1.0
5.0
SOC100
Dec 6, 2007

wasn't helpful, looked down on student and wasn't open to new ideas. Overall, the most boring and mean teacher i've had in a long time.

2.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 12, 2007

This teacher should not be allowed to teach. I honestly think that bc she has tenure she just doesnt give a crap about her students. I had an interest for sociology until I took her. Rather than showing different views, she just jams her views down your throat. She makes students feel horrible about any response they give and she hates america!

2.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 12, 2007

Horrible teacher. She doesn't give anything back or even an idea of her grading policy. You have no idea what the range for any grade is but it doesnt matter because she doesnt give you any grades back,ever. The first grade you get is your final grade with no excuses or test grades to back it up. She could easily make up grades and noone would know

2.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 12, 2007

people in her higher classes may have liked her but she HATES her intro level classes. Its ironic that a soc prof. discriminates agsinst a certain stereotype. She says all the students are middle/upper class and dont have the proper knowledge bc of it. She looks down upon us. She throws everything on her TAs and doesnt do anything herself.

2.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 19, 2007

Do not take this class. I took it for a gen ed and it was a huge mistake. She is a mean, horrible teacher who doesn't give a crap about her students. It was an awful choice for my first semester and was a lot of unnecessary stress. If you must take it, go to the class, try to make the best of it and good luck.

2.0
5.0
SOC100B
Dec 24, 2007

Wasn't at all helpful. & always had a tendency 2 criticize students. Never explained anything. Buying the books was a huge waste of time and money. TA's were horrible- hard 2 understand. Grades were never posted on blackboard,& made up their own standards and rules for grading. No range, and you never knew where you stood in the class. No feedback!

1.0
3.0
SOC100B
Jan 17, 2008

This could of been an excellent class. I think she makes MANY EXCELLENT points about America. However, she is pretentious. It's her job to help her students (we pay for our education!) and she fails in doing so. Unfortunately, this causes her interesting messages to not come across well.....And Zhandarka Kurti was an excellent TA.

2.0
5.0
SOC262
May 15, 2008

Gives no assistance to students. Is horrible at giving instructions and is rude. Would recommend careful consideration before signing up for her brand of torture.

5.0
3.0
SOC100B
Nov 1, 2008

She is a sharp and critical professor. You will learn an enormous lot from her. Just do the work, and you'll do fine.

4.0
3.0
SOC100B
Nov 4, 2008

Sarkar can turn a lecture into a challenging discussion. If you make an argument or even just answer a factual question, she'll always ask you to elaborate. She is a no-nonsense woman, and she can come off as pretty aloof and condescending, but I don't think that's her intention--it's just her nature. Moderate challenge.

2.0
2.0
SOC100B
Nov 12, 2008

Notes all over the place, talks too fast. No written form of notes.

5.0
3.0
SOC101
Dec 20, 2008

Super Professor. Clear, progressive, cool. Take her class if you don't want to remain in the 20th century.

5.0
4.0
CLASS01
Feb 20, 2009

One of the best!

5.0
3.0
SOC101
Feb 28, 2009

This is a really serious professor. She pays attention to students and is very helpful. She is smart, funny and cutting-edge. She is what a university is supposed to be all about.

4.0
3.0
SOC100A
May 6, 2009

Took the course for Fall 2008 as a Freshman, overall enjoyed the class though the material can be a bit difficult to understand sometimes. Very nice but no-nonsense and fairly serious during lectures, always asks you to elaborate and think further which is cool. However, does mislead you a bit on what you need to study for exams, which sucks a bit.

5.0
2.0
SOC101
Sep 20, 2009

This is a very smart and super-cool professor. She is helpful and strongly supportive-as long as she feels that your question/comment is honest. She is challenging in the BEST way: she will make you think-the whole point of a class. And she speaks better English than most, not exactly a bad thing for a professor. Do you want to grow? TAKE HER!

4.0
3.0
SOC100
Dec 15, 2010

good class, interesting. test are a bit tricky the way she words thing. multiple choice and short essays. final was a take home essay, so thats a plus. good class. requires a lot of memorizing of terms and facts. the most random things you learn could end up on the test, and things you think that are superr important may not be on the test at all.

3.0
3.0
SOC100
Apr 6, 2011

Not a very good teacher, hard to understand. People afraid to raise their hand because we were never right when answering questions. Not very helpful outside of class. Tough grader if you don't write exactly what she wants you get points off.

2.0
4.0
SOC100B
Oct 30, 2012

I worked hard- read all the required materials. Found it interesting, and manageable

3.0
3.0
SOC100B
Nov 21, 2012

Mahua is a great teacher! I learned so much from her class and found it very interesting. I would recommend anyone to take this class. It is hard yet managable. If you do all the reading, take good notes, and study hard for the tests you can for sure get an A!

3.0
5.0
SOC100B
Nov 26, 2012

Semi-think Indian accent and a she talks very fast. Cant really understand her when she talks so fast and is hard to take notes that fast. She has an intense amount of knowledge and I learned a lot during her class. Is a lecture but make sure you go to class since a lot of material covered is on the tests. Make sure you at least skim the readings.

3.0
2.0
SOC100B
Nov 27, 2012

Unless you want to spend a semester hearing about some woman's political views and how America is worse than every other country do not take this class. Rather than learning about sociology we learned about how America oppresses the world. Whether you agree or not, this has nothing to do with sociology.

3.0
4.0
SOC100B
Dec 12, 2012

Could have been an interesting class...if taught by someone else. She's hard to understand, not very open to questions, and she comes off very condescending. Her tests are very specific, and if you don't write exactly what she wants, you're wrong. TAs are very hit or miss. Avoid her class unless you want to hear about how awful America is.

3.0
3.0
SOC100B
Dec 15, 2012

really nice and helpful professor, interesting lectures which tests are based on, make sure you pay attention to everything in class, including textbook readings and films. discussion periods are for review so prepare questions.

3.0
3.0
SOC100B
Dec 29, 2012

I loved this class! It was interesting and a slight challenge. Every week there was reading from the textbook, which wasn't too much. Her tests were fair. I put alot of effort and studying for her tests and got an A, A-. She can be intimidating at times, but if you state and prove your opinion well she'll respect you. If your willing to work takeit

2.0
4.0
SOC100B
Feb 6, 2013

She talked very quickly and had an accent that was hard to understand at times. I went to every lecture and took intensive notes and still didn't receive a good grade at the end of the semester. She was an extremely harsh grader and took points off even for grammar mistakes. SOC with her as a professor was terrible.

2.0
3.0
SOC262
May 11, 2013

You need to read everything she gives you because she tests on the most minute details. She assigned the final assignment-a four page paper- at 10 pm on Tuesday when it was due at 10 am Thursday. She doesn't give guidance on the group project and will tear you apart. With that being said, her midterm and final is easy as long as you read the books.

5.0
2.0
SOC262
Sep 8, 2013

The professor is really smart and she makes comments that this class is so easy compared to her schooling in India which is annoying. She makes sassy comments, and as long as they aren't pointed at you, shes really funny. She expects you to think critically, which is good. Overall, I loved her class.

2.0
3.0
SOC100B
Nov 17, 2014

I walked into the class thinking that it would be interesting and was sadly disappointed. She is a nice lady but a horrible lecturer. It is extremely hard to take notes because she speaks very quickly and has an accent which is slightly hard to comprehend (only when she speaks as quickly as she does). Tests are good, should attend lectures.

1.0
4.0
100B
Nov 22, 2014

VERY rude, mean, and belittling. Sits on desk in front of room and talks at lecture hall, angry and belittling if we don't know answer to question. Unhelpful. Snobby; if the question is an opinion question only her opinion is the right answer. I'm scared to raise my hand in lecture. Late every lecture, even the last test we took. Bad experience.

1.0
4.0
SOC100B
Dec 17, 2014

Horrible teacher. I thought I liked sociology and wanted to major in it, but this professor changed my mind. With a professor like this, I don't know if I even want to continue at this University. She is snobby and hates America, mean and white people in general.

2.0
3.0
100B
Feb 25, 2015

I basically passed this class thanks to my TA. I barely learned a thing from lecture, she can be difficult to understand. In addition, she does not prepare any slides so it's hard to go along with what she is saying. She also skips around a lot. I don't think she's a terrible teacher but she definitely does not extend effort to help you out.

1.0
5.0
SOC100B
May 5, 2016

Horrible teacher. Her final is insane and she gives such a short amount of time to complete it. She does not prepare any slides and talks at her students. Studying for tests are impossible because there is no clarity in her notes. She is snobby and scary. Don't take any class with her! Worst professor I've ever had.

4.0
4.0
SOC262
Grade: Not sure yet
May 17, 2016

Professor Sarkar definitely knows what she's talking about. You can fall a little behind in class but be sure you've read everything for the tests. Almost nobody in my class got a good grade on the midterm and a lot of people dropped the class. Still, the class was interesting and she gives good feedback on everything you do/say.

3.0
4.0
SOC262
May 17, 2016

Professor Sarkar can come off as condescending and she can get snippy with people who share their opinions. Her grading criteria is very unclear and she usually can't explain the grades that she gives you or how to improve. There are also very few grades which makes it hard to do well. Still, the class was so interesting I'd take it again.

4.0
3.0
SOC262
Grade: A
Aug 25, 2016
Would take again

Amazing professor - she's a bit harsh for an underlevel class, but she's very principled and hilarious! Definitely makes the class topics interesting. I will at me she's a harsh dresser, but if you pay careful attention to her lectures, you should be fine. Really a personable and inspirational professor!

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Inspirational
4.0
3.0
SOC262
Grade: A-
Oct 19, 2016
Would take again

Professor Sarkar is definitely one of the harsher professors, especially for underlevel classes, but she's by far one of the greatest and most interesting lecturers. She keeps things hilarious and to the point, and might come off condescending at times, but she knows her stuff.

Tough Grader
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
1.0
4.0
SOC100B
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT take this class because she will ruin your GPA. I absolutely hate this class because her lectures are all over the place (she goes out of order, there is no visual presentation to follow, and she just repeats the textbook), her tests comprise of 3 extended response questions, and she is NOT open to different opinions. Worst decision I made.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
100B
Dec 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

If you are taking this class for an easy gen ed, THINK AGAIN!! This professor is very unclear during lectures (no powerpoints) and you have no idea what is going on half the time. DO NOT take this class, the TA's also aren't very helpful. Buy the textbook if you do take this class because it might guide you in the right direction of what she wants.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
Tests? Not many
1.0
4.0
100B
Grade: C-
Dec 13, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Took this class thinking, hey this seems cool. Nope. So many books and movies (watched in class) that you need to know. Tests: only two - all short answers which if you don't know key points you're screwed. Final being only two three page essays, not bad if there was any more detail given. 0/10 wouldn't take again.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
4.0
SOC100
Grade: C-
Dec 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She is not the best at connecting the material. The tests are not always related to lecture notes, and the textbook is not helpful at all. I attended all of the lectures and tutorials, studied for hours on tests but still did not do well in the class. I wouldn't take this class because you learn nothing about sociology.

Tough Grader
Tests are tough
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
SOC100B
Grade: D
Dec 20, 2017
Wouldn't take again

If you're not "synthesizing" information and writing word for word answers on the tests, you won't get a decent grade. Tests have no curve and awful grading criteria. Super difficult readings and boring lectures.

Tough Grader
Tests are tough
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
SOC262
Grade: C
Jan 12, 2018
Wouldn't take again

unclear grading criteria, doesnt follow syllabus, isnt receptive or openminded, boring lectures for 3 hours that made no sense, i regret not listening to rate my professor when i signed up for the class - dont take this and make the mistake i did

1.0
5.0
SOC100
Jan 30, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Worst professor I've ever had on this campus. She is boring as anything and it has to be her way or no way. Her two tests are useless and have nothing to do with some of the movies you watch or reading you do. Your grades are based on two tests, a final paper, and discussions. Horrible avoid at all costs. AVOID IT I WARN YOU

LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
SOC100
Mar 7, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Worst class in my four years at Binghamton. I would not suggest taking this course with this professor.

1.0
5.0
SOC100A
Nov 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Mahua is one of the worst teachers I've ever had. I wish I followed the feedback telling me not to take this class, but I'm in it now and I'm miserable. Your whole grade is based off three grades and she doesn't explain where you lose points and all of the questions are so oddly specific. She is extremely judgemental and degrading, don't take it!!!

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
SOC100A
Nov 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

If I could give her a zero I would. She's such a tough grader with no information on how to get good grades. Absolutely hate this class. Studied over 4 hours for the last test and barely got a 70.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
2.0
4.0
SOC100
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 7, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Your grade is based on three things - two midterms and one final paper. I've failed both midterms. Weekly tutorials are boring and drone on forever. I've done the reading and studied lots and yet I can't seem to pass this class. It's for a gen ed, but honestly... I wouldn't recommend it.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
3.0
SOC100
Grade: A-
Dec 14, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She isn't prepared for lectures, and will randomly call on people to participate when she runs out of things to talk about. She encourages questions, but will make you feel stupid. She gives confusing lectures, if you ask her to clarify she'll refuse. The only reason I did well was my wonderful TA Busra, who explained everything during Discussion

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
SOC100
Grade: B
Dec 27, 2018
Would take again

Knowledgeable professor who makes the info interesting. lecture ranges from her verbalizing information to watching movies or discussing readings. only two tests and the final essay plus participation and attendance are counted for the total grade

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
SOC100
Grade: A-
Dec 31, 2018
Wouldn't take again

As the semester went on she got lazy and put on a documentary everyday then forced people to talk about it in lecture. Test open ended questions are impossible because if you don't write the exact answer she wants you get a lot of pointa off. She wants people to participate but then makes you feel dumb for answering. Got an -A because of my TA.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
4.0
SOC100
Grade: A
Jan 24, 2019
Would take again

Prof. Sarkhar is a very intelligent woman with every good intention when it comes to teaching. She is tough, but her class prepares you for rigorous college work. Take good notes during lectures and do the readings and you'll be fine. She can be sort of sassy/aggressive at times, but is nice and funny overall. Her class is test heavy, so study!

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
TEST HEAVY
2.0
4.0
SOC100
Grade: A
Jan 24, 2019
Would take again

Prof. Sarkar definitely knows her stuff, but can be slightly condescending. She is at times funny but can also be very aggressive and snippy. Her tests are easy, but the grading is so harsh that it makes it almost impossible to get a good grade. Grading is ridiculous- only wants VERY specific word for word answers for open ended questions.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
SOC100
Grade: A
Mar 15, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Terrible. If you have an option to not take it then don't. There are three grades: two midterms and a final paper. They seem easy enough but she grades so randomly and harshly its impossible to do well. You have to write EXACTLY what she wants. Shes rude and condescending then wonders why no one participates. Also makes you buy/rent like 13 books.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Tough grader
5.0
4.0
SOC262
Grade: A
Apr 16, 2019
Would take again

This might be kind of a hot take, I love Prof. Sarkar I highly recommend her. You have to work for your grade, as her tests are typically all open-ended, but have no fear if you grind and read the sources you'll do great. Super intelligent and funny, and such an amazing woman, seriously one of the smartest people I know. Go to office hours too!

Gives good feedback
Respected
Get ready to read
1.0
5.0
SOC262
Grade: F
May 16, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Horrible

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
SOC100
Grade: A
Jun 13, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Her class was the only class that gave me anxiety to go to. I feel like I would've liked the material with any other professor. She is very knowledgeable, but is extremely condescending and downright aggressive to students who try to participate in class, and then wonders why no one wants to participate. Don't just walk, RUN from her. Not worth it.

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
SOC100
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 14, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Just wow. The content itself (readings, concepts, etc.) is not that difficult but Professor Sarkar makes this class the most anxiety-inducing and upsetting on my schedule. If someone doesn't agree with her, she completely tears them down and then gets angry when no one wants to participate and subject themselves to her wrath. Don't take her!

Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
SOC100A
Oct 12, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The grading part of this course is mostly up to the TAs, however, Professor Sarkar does all the lectures & writes the exams. She doesn't allow you to express your opinion during the lecture if you do & she doesn't agree with you " you're wrong. " Definitely made me like I can't even talk during class. The readings are long and must keep up with it

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
SOC100A
Grade: C+
Dec 22, 2020
Wouldn't take again

She mainly did all the speaking during lectures and wasn't clear on what her expectations were. My TA wasn't the clearest either and when I met with him to go over my exam he told me the notes I copied directly from the prof was wrong and took points off for not writing the maximum number of pages for the exam.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
SOC100A
Grade: C+
Dec 23, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Worst class I've ever taken. She is aggressive during lecture and makes you feel stupid when expressing your opinion and says you're wrong if she doesn't agree with you so no one likes to participate. Grade based off 2 short answer tests and a final essay. They're graded pretty hard and you have to write the max amount to get full credit basically.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Test heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

69%

Textbook Required

30%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

95% confidence
Based on 21 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
Not sure yet (4)
A- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(2)C(5)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(4)
Based on 25 reported grades
A: 7
Not sure yet: 4
A-: 3
B: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (11)
Get ready to read (11)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (7)
LECTURE HEAVY (7)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Graded by few things (4)
Tough grader (4)
Participation matters (3)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.06 avg change
Apr
May
Jun
Sep
Oct
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SOC300

5.0

(1)

CLASS01

5.0

(1)

SOC480R

4.0

(1)

SOC101

3.8

(5)

SOC278

3.0

(1)
+10 more courses
Difficulty by Course

SOC278

5.0

SOC100A

4.1

SOC480R

4.0

SOCIOLOGY100B

4.0

CLASS01

4.0

Similar Professors