2.9

Marisol De La Cadena

Anthropology - University of California Davis

2.9
Quality
2.3
Difficulty
51%
Would Retake
131
Reviews
2.9
Quality
2.3
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.8
Clarity

51%

Would Retake

131

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

24

4

24

3

32

2

26

1

25

What Students Say

I will NEVER take another class with this professor

ANT2 - 1.0 rating

Discussion was this class's saving grace

ANT002 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

45%

Textbook Required

35%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

95% confidence
Based on 52 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (25)
A (21)
Not sure yet (6)
Grade Distribution
A(46)B(2)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 62 reported grades
A+: 25
A: 21
Not sure yet: 6
Rather not say: 4
Common Tags
Get ready to read (32)
Participation matters (15)
Lecture heavy (14)
Beware of pop quizzes (14)
Clear grading criteria (13)
LECTURE HEAVY (7)
Graded by few things (6)
Inspirational (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.66 avg change
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jun
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

AHTRO2

5.0

(1)

ANT138

5.0

(1)

ANTH139

5.0

(1)

ANT123

4.0

(1)

ANT139N

4.0

(1)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

AHTRO2

4.0

ANT101

4.0

ANT144

3.2

ANT4

3.0

ANT

3.0

Reviews (131)
1.0
3.0
ANT4
Oct 22, 2003

The worst lecture professor i have ever had!

3.0
3.0
ANT2
Nov 3, 2003

Very nice lady, but her lecture style just sucks. She tries to treat a 350-person class like a 20-person discussion. The 80-minute lectures cover about 20 minutes worth of material, and lack continuity and direction.

1.0
2.0
ANT142
Nov 3, 2003

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ANT2
Nov 6, 2003

Boring and unorganized lectures. She asks students a lot of questions, but it doesn't seem like the questions are actually answered.

3.0
2.0
ASA2
Nov 7, 2003

Pretty boring class. The reading material is interesting, but her lectures make me fall asleep. She talks too slow and by the time she's finished with the sentence, I can't remeber the first part, she asks too many questions and doesn't answer them.

4.0
2.0
ANTH2
Nov 11, 2003

She is willing to help

3.0
2.0
ANT002
Nov 12, 2003

Interesting material, PAINFULLY boring class and professor. Take the course, but not from her. Unless you have sleep you need to catch up on, then this is your class.

3.0
3.0
ANT
Nov 13, 2003

She is a very nice person. But her lectures are extremely difficult to follow, lacks organization, she constantly goes off on tangents. Interesting subject matter. Go to her office hours, very willing to help if you put in the effort. Lots of reading

4.0
4.0
ANT002
Nov 18, 2003

her lectures tend to be very anti-climatic. at the end of the lecture i find myself falling alseep! Good information, but horriable teaching methods.

2.0
3.0
ANT2
Nov 20, 2003

class is un organized midterms are graded very difficult and she never brings clarity to anything plus if she writes on the board it is over becauses its impossible to follow

3.0
2.0
ANTH2
Dec 5, 2003

she is a very nice person and discusses interesting topics, but the lectures are repetative and unclear. the midterm was easy, but do the reading cause she gives in class quizes on it.

1.0
2.0
ANT2
Dec 8, 2003

As is common in the Anthro department, this professor is awful. She has never successfully completed a lecture the entire quarter. She goes off on tangents with alarming regularity. She doesn't answer email. Hopeless.

2.0
4.0
ANT2
Dec 9, 2003

I used to like anthro until i took her class.... too many long and dry readings...horrible study guides...good luck youll need it if you have her

5.0
3.0
ANT002
Dec 11, 2003

Concentrates on few key points and structures all lectures and readings around them. She teaches a deepened cross-cultural understanding that everyone can appreciate. Little hard to understand, and slow-moving lectures, but great readings (expect a lot)

3.0
3.0
ANTHRO2
Dec 14, 2003

The readings and information is very interesting. But there is a lot of it! The Lectures are extremely boring and unhelpful, however, you still need to attend because of the pop quizzes. A lot of work is involved but the class isn't too difficult.

2.0
3.0
ANT2
Dec 14, 2003

Can't lecture for beans. Disorganized, reader becomes redundant, 7 pages of sample essay questions for final. Toughened up when she realized half the class never came, and the rest were asleep. Great material, but not from her.

5.0
4.0
AHTRO2
Dec 17, 2003

She's has a lot of interesting stuff to say, that if you think about, deepens your understanding of the world and relationships. The first 6 weeks I was bored out of my mind, but when I started listening to what she had to say, and pondering it,it was fun

3.0
3.0
ANT2
Dec 21, 2003

Lectures are dry, and random. One lecture spent 45 minutes on how "the old isn't old and the new isn't new." Chalkboard VERY unorganized. Readings are long and plentiful, some interesting, some unbearable. Ridiculous amount of study question

2.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 1, 2004

The best part of the class- the dreams you have. Boring. Don't get me started on the chalkboard notes. She acts like she makes things up on the way. The midterm is sorta easy, but they grade ridiculously hard.

1.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 17, 2004

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 23, 2004

if you've never fallen asleep in a class TAKE HER there will be history in the making

1.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 24, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ANT2
Mar 31, 2004

GET OUT NOW!! Prof De La Cadena attempts to teach through muddled, random, incomprehensible lectures that circle around obscure points and endless reading assingments that are ridiculously hard and irrelevant. Easily the worst class at UCD.

2.0
2.0
ANT2
Apr 3, 2004

I thought that she sucked. The entire quarter was spent as a huge discussion section with four hundred people. She would draw these random linkages between vast ideas on the board that were incomprehensible. Lectures were useless.

1.0
1.0
ANTHRO2
Apr 6, 2004

Anthro 2 with de la Cadena was the easiest and most worthless class I ever took. I didn't go to half the lectures and got an easy A by bullshitting about "culture."

3.0
3.0
ANTHRO2
May 8, 2004

Believe what you see according to other comments. She leads her lectures through class disc. and gets mad at times when no one talks. Also lec. aren't consistent, one day good, one day bad. Must read or won't do well on exams!

5.0
4.0
ANT2
Aug 17, 2004

Ant2,best class I took in my 3 years at Davis.DLC Lectures got my heart beating fast and tingles in my spine.Her ideas are powerful can open your eyes to the ways of the world.If you are narrow minded and ignorant,like the complainers dont take the class.

5.0
3.0
ANT2
Aug 19, 2004

Boo Hoo to all the stupid freshman that complain about her, she is such a great lady.I guess it would be uncomfortable for some to actually think about important ideas if you are really so lazy and ignorant.If you are motivated to expand your mind take it

3.0
4.0
ANT2
Sep 25, 2004

went to every lecture and read all of the material and I still found it very hard to follow her ideas or understand her in class notes which are basically just words with circles around them and completely useless to study with,worked very hard and got a

2.0
2.0
ANT2
Oct 2, 2004

God, stop saying only ignorant freshmen hated her. I'm an anthro major and hated her anyway. Good material, but not from her. So PLEASE stop saying that only narrow minded complainers couldn't stand her. PLEASE.

5.0
3.0
ANT2
Oct 6, 2004

this professor is so enthusiastic about her research it is awesome. i loved this teacher.

5.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 28, 2005

she is the awesomest teacher there is. if u worthless people who say she's bad would actually try to get a life, you would see this. hahahahaha.

5.0
3.0
ANT2
Apr 11, 2005

I believe she was a VERY good teacher. it's not true that ONLY narrowminded freshmans wouldn't understand her, narrow minded ANTHRO MAJORS may not be able to understand her. so get your nose out of the air and try to enjoy.

5.0
3.0
ANT2
May 30, 2005

She is an amazing professor.She taught me so much. not only about hte course but about myself. I enjoy this subject and i hope people reading this will open their eyes and try this class because it's really worth it. have a great time with this professor, she is amazing.

2.0
3.0
ANT139AN
Oct 20, 2005

Can you say "WHAAAAAAAAAAAT???" Because that's what you're going to be saying a lot if you take this class with her. This class blows, period.

4.0
3.0
ANT139AN
Oct 25, 2005

She is very passionate and strives to expand our capacity to think about the notions of "race". The required readings are very helpful and thought provoking. I highly recommend her class if you enjoy viewing the world from many different perspectives and are curious how and why "race" continues to work through our society today.

5.0
1.0
ANT139AN
Dec 20, 2005

The best professor that I've ever had!

2.0
4.0
ANT139AN
Mar 20, 2006

Very unclear, I mean VERY unclear, and boring! She is confusing and stubborn in her teaching style. No thank you.

5.0
1.0
ANT138
May 15, 2006

One of the most amazing and inspiring professors I have ever taken! She is one of the most approachable and caring professor I have come across!

5.0
3.0
ANTH139
Apr 27, 2007

My favorite professor! Learned a great deal of good stuff! she is very helpful and is willing to explain the material outside of class. I really enjoyed the class and would recommend any class by this excellent professor!

4.0
2.0
ANT123
Jan 11, 2011

She lectures extremely slowly and repeats herself often, so if you're easily confused it will be a good class for you. Unfortunately, her ANT 123 class is not at all about what the title indicates, and she admits this in the first class. It's a great deal of political philosophy. Avoid.

4.0
2.0
ANT144
Mar 14, 2011

Another name for this class would be political philosophy 101. However, she is quite brilliant if you can get past here flawed English and slow lecture style.You will have to write "memos" every week and a 5 (midterm) and 9 (final)page assignments. Bottom line; if you are into philosophy, by all means, if not, steer clear. Easy class otherwise.

3.0
2.0
ANT139
Jun 9, 2011

This was such a boring class. It would have been easy if I could just get myself to pay attention. She never has slides, and her lectures are never organized so taking notes is hard. the class feels like a long discussion section, so if you like that you might like her class. But if you like structure, don't take this class.

4.0
2.0
ANT139N
Aug 26, 2011

She talks a lot, & she expects to hear one's opinions on the assigned readings in class. Also she rarely uses slides, so be prepared to train your ears. She really does cares about her students & she knows her material. The grading was very fair also(TA was great). Do the readings and participate, and you already cover 60% of your grade. Not hard.

4.0
2.0
ANT144
May 9, 2012

Had her for Ant 139AN last spring, & Ant 144AN a quarter ago(winter). Both classes are very theoretical, but the readings for the assigned weekly memos required, + 2 papers + participation is fair. Also, I don't understand how she is rated so low on clarity. She speaks slowly and repeats herself SEVERAL times to make concepts clear. Great teacher!

3.0
4.0
ANT002
Jun 12, 2012

This was a pretty easy course overall. As long as you attend lecture and discussion, you can probably get away with just skimming the readings. She rambles a lot, so it gets kind of old. Short written responses to videos each week that give you points just for turning them in (they're not graded for content) and a paper. Easy class overall.

5.0
1.0
ANT002
Jun 25, 2012

Very knowledgeable and enthusiastic. Overall she was a great professor. She was kind of boring and redundant at times but it was to ensure that material was understood. Easy exams and very helpful study guides. You just really have to immerse yourself in thinking differently to pass the class.

4.0
1.0
ANT2
Jul 3, 2012

very easy class with interesting information. you watch a video every friday and are required to write a response paper. its not graded, you just turn it in for credit. at the end of the quarter, you write a 3-4 page paper. easy a in course if you pay attention and do all mandatory work.

5.0
1.0
ANT2
Aug 2, 2012

This class was straightforward. Do readings/watch videos and make written responses (pass/no pass). A four page paper, 1 midterm, and a final. 5 easy random quizzes over the quarter. Overall a simple and insightful class, people might say it was boring but I liked it. If you do the work/study slides I don't see how you can't get an A.

3.0
4.0
ANT2
Sep 5, 2012

This class is easy!!!! human development majors, take this anthro class for your pre rec. do the reading, write response paper, going to class is key! an A grade is easy to get!

5.0
1.0
ANT002
Nov 7, 2012

One of the most easy and interesting class I have ever taken. There are weekly video response papers (as long as you put effort you get full credit), 2 midterms, 1 final paper (3 pages), and 1 final exam. Super easy and the professor taught me a lot of things that was useful for other classes. I got an A+ in the class and my TA Rima was amazing!

3.0
1.0
ANT2
Jun 15, 2013

Easy class, very interesting. Don't care too much for the teacher- nice but goes on crazy long tangents during class. Go to class for the videos, otherwise don't know if it's worth it. Discussions were helpful.

1.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 15, 2015

She ruined the class for me. She was really unclear; it always seemed like she confused herself, and the way she tried to engage discussion was really poor. The material was very redundant. If you asked her a question, she'd make it more confusing, or she'd tell you she hasn't looked at the slides in ages. Tests were okay, but a bit ambiguous.

1.0
4.0
ANT2
Mar 15, 2015

Terrible lecturer, confuses herself then confuses you, doesn't review slides so loses herself during lecture, not helpful before or after lecture or in office hours. Don't take her. Exams aren't bad, but they can be ambiguous.

3.0
2.0
ANT02
Mar 18, 2015

Easy class but very boring. Not the best lecturer. Weekly video response papers graded on completion. Tests were easy and short.

1.0
3.0
ANT2
Mar 18, 2015

I will never take another anthropology class because of this professor. She complicated the subject matter and confused everyone. Then she surprises everyone with an easy exam. Lots of readings and half the quarter is spent watching boring outdated documentaries. I will NEVER take another class with this professor. Advice: Stay Away!

2.0
2.0
ANT2
Mar 20, 2015

Her lectures can be super confusing although she is really into her subject. There are weekly 1 page response papers due every week on a film watched in class. Discussion is mandatory. There is a 4 page paper due at the end of the quarter on 2 articles and a film we watched. Exams are really easy; there are some short essay questions though.

3.0
2.0
ANT2
Mar 21, 2015

You can tell she's passionate about what she's teaching. She's a bit confusing and has a hard time explaining things. Everything in the class is so abstract. Lectures were boring but some of the info was interesting. Weekly film response - super easy. 1 midterm, 1 final, and 1 analysis essay. Class is doable. The class is overall easy though.

4.0
2.0
ANTTHRO2
Mar 21, 2015

This class was so boring. I had no idea what she was talking about, but I still ended up with a B :) There is one midterm and a final. Shows a movie once a week and you have to write a response, but you are given credit for just writing it. Midterm and Final are short and just like her study guide. 5 pop quizzes in discussion. Overall easy class.

3.0
2.0
ANT2
Mar 21, 2015

She's very passionate about her subject, but her lecture are boring and concepts are often confusing. The workload is doable- weekly readings and film response papers that are graded on completion, 1 analysis paper, 1 midterm, and 1 final. The midterm and final are easy if you know the study guide well. Her questions are taken directly from there.

3.0
3.0
ANT2
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2015

The tests and written assignments aren't that hard, but there is a toooooon of reading. I don't think that most of the students did it, but, even so, it was overwhelming. Her lectures are confusing, and I felt like she talked about the same few things over and over. Her lectures are full of typos. TA's are helpful though.

2.0
2.0
ANT002
Apr 9, 2015

Marisol thinks she is God's gift to teaching, but her lectures are long, boring, and repetitive. When asking her to clarify a slide, she told me she didn't know what was on them and that she wrote them years ago. The only reason to go to class is to watch the films we need to write on. Discussion was this class's saving grace.

3.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Sep 30, 2015

The lectures boring, so I don't recommend that you go. Moreover, you can find the most of the (bi)weekly films online, so all the more reason to not go. Attend the discussion sections as they help in re-emphasizing lecture material. Exam questions mainly come from the study guides provided so do take a look at those. Overall, a fairly easy class.

1.0
4.0
ANT101
Mar 3, 2016

This is the worst class I have ever taken at Davis. What she actually taught didn't match the class description AT ALL. She's all over the place, most of the readings are completely inaccessible. No book, no tests, no point in going because she never makes sense. I will never take a class by her again and I recommend others avoid her as well.

4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2017
Would take again

Probably my favorite class so far! Marisol is great but she can definitely get confusing from time to time. I'll be honest, I am an extremely passionate anthro major so this class was very interesting to me. However, it would honestly be a pretty boring class if you don't find the subject interesting. Lecture based and lots of readings.

Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
ANT2
Mar 28, 2017
Would take again

Easy A and you learn so much about the world. She speaks slowly but she's pretty clear. Class is entirely based on abstract concepts and the fact that she is able to put them into words is amazing. Really cares and tries to know your name. Understands that you might be a science major and just want an A, so she makes it easy but still passionate.

5.0
2.0
ANT2
Mar 28, 2017
Would take again

People don't know it but she's actually really famous in the anthropology academic world. I would recommend going to office hours to get concepts clarified because they can get pretty deep. Answer every question on study guide if you want to do well on the exams. Don't miss a single assignment because they're a huge chunk of your grade. No curve.

3.0
2.0
ANT02
Grade: A
Apr 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

The study guide is the same as the exam! Don't purchase books, readings are available on Canvas. It is better to sit through lecture and listen than try to understand the slides on your own. The content is interesting, but can be tedious, so try your best to stay engaged and find reasons to be interested. Don't be intimidated, world load is doable

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
5.0
2.0
ANT02
Grade: A
Aug 6, 2017
Would take again

This is the BEST class I have taken at UC Davis so far! Professor Marisol highlights the importance of how we view concepts and explores different realities. At times it can be difficult conceptually, but it was so worth it. The class itself isn't hard. The midterms are exactly like the slides and study guides. Take this class!!!!

Participation matters
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
1.0
4.0
ANT144
Jan 31, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Boooooooooooooooooring. The class is supposed to be about Latin America but we have yet to even talk about it. We've been learning about really abstract things and the class is way too long (2 hours). She has us do 'weekly memos' were we post on canvas a response to the article we read. Only reason I'm taking this class is because I have to..

Get ready to read
2.0
3.0
ANT144
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 12, 2018
Wouldn't take again

only stayed in this class because it is required. She makes things super confusing.

Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
ANT144
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Horrible class. She is a smart woman, but not a good professor

Get ready to read
Participation matters
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
1.0
ANT002
Apr 23, 2018
Would take again

This is the easiest professor for ANT 2, all the TAs say that over half the class gets a solid A and the only people who fail are ones who don't turn in completed assignments. But you do have to put in the work and the concepts get pretty abstract. She understands that many are taking for an easy GE, so she expects you to work but is chill.

1.0
1.0
ANT002
Nov 14, 2018
Would take again

This is the easiest class I have ever taken, including my time in high school. All lectures are posted online so you never have to go to class. The only required attendance is discussion, where they might give quizzes for attendance (those are also easy). Easy grader, all you need to do is look at the study guide. Warning: she talks REALLY slow.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Clear grading criteria
2.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Dec 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This is the easiest and most boring class I've ever taken. She talks very slow and monotonously and it's tough NOT to fall asleep in he class. Discussions are mandatory but they aren't bad because the TAs are cool.

LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Dec 15, 2018
Would take again

Easy A. Read the lecture slides really well before the midterms, they have all the information you need. Always attend your discussion and participate, this is a big part of your grade. Do all the write-ups from the in-class videos and you're golden. Final is a paper so get an early start.

2.0
2.0
ANT002
Dec 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Do the response papers, show up to discussion, and read a couple of the lengthier readings, and you'll pass. Her lectures are long, a little redundant, and somewhat boring at times, but she makes the class very easy. A simple, high credit G.E. for STEM majors to knock out some social science units and the domestic diversity req.

Get ready to read
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
2.0
ANT02
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2018
Would take again

As long as you do the response papers and show up to discussion, you should have no problem with getting an A in the class. The midterm questions are the exact same from the the study guide she provides for students. The main ideas for the midterms are the topics that she repeats often during her lectures.

Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2018
Would take again

Lectures are pretty interesting, and as long as you follow along you should be golden. Response papers are really easy to complete. Midterms are based on a question sheet she posts as a study guide. Mandatory discussion. Final paper was super easy to complete.

Get ready to read
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jan 1, 2019
Would take again

I felt that she was a good lecturer and effectively conveyed difficult topics. I rarely attended lectures, but watched the videos. There's long articles to read each week, but I only read the few which appeared on the study guides for the tests. There is a weekly short paper/brainstorm which is graded by completion. Tests are straightforward.

Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Amazing lectures
4.0
3.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Jan 13, 2019
Would take again

Her lectures get a bit boring at times, but she isn't a bad teacher. As long as you do the study guides for the two midterms, you'll be fine. The final was a paper, which wasn't too hard to complete.

Respected
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Feb 1, 2019
Would take again

Super easy class. Basically gifted an A for everything without even studying

Clear grading criteria
4.0
1.0
ANT002
Mar 18, 2019
Would take again

Her lectures are okay, I took it for GE credit and an easy A, I didn't have to do much work. TA's matter a lot in this class. You technically don't have to show up to lectures, but everything she tests is on the lectures. It gets a bit repetitive and slow, but her exams do make you think.

2.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2019
Wouldn't take again

While she knew her stuff about the subject, she really lacks communication skills. Her lectures were always all over the place. She placed emphasis on getting multiple people to answer her questions in class, even if they were to say the exact. same. thing. I love cultural anthropology, but she made it so that I never looked forward to class. :/

Lecture heavy
4.0
1.0
ANT02
Grade: A
Jun 5, 2020
Would take again

De La Cadena is a kind professor and she is personable. Her notes do not make much sense and can be very vague IF you do not do the reading beforehand. I personally found required videos very interesting and made class fun. We had about 8 one page response papers(very easy), mandatory discussion(with quizzes), and two exams. All of which were fair.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
So many papers
5.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 14, 2020
Would take again

This class is easy if you put in the time to work on the assignments and just watch the lectures. This quarter was different as we were watching a pre-recorded lectures and I found it interesting and inspiring. My TA was nice on the grading, and I did put in the time so I got a higher grade than expected. Not hard, do the READING and ASSIGNMENTS. A

Respected
Inspirational
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 22, 2020
Would take again

Professor de la Cadena was really great. This class is extremely easy but if you put in some effort you can learn a lot about the world and yourself. Sometimes concepts covered seemed self explanatory but she really makes you think deeply about them. Overall, not hard at all. Watch her lectures and show up to your discussions and you will be good.

Respected
Beware of pop quizzes
Caring
3.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jul 27, 2020
Would take again

Probably the easiest class that I will take in college. Weekly/biweekly video responses that I turned in late a lot and still got credit on. 2 exams that she basically gives all the answers/background to in her review lectures. She is kinda boring and tends to talk in circles but definitely brings new perspectives to life. A GREAT gpa boost.

Get ready to read
4.0
1.0
ANT2
Grade: A+
Jun 10, 2021
Would take again

Easy A--like really easy A. But beyond that, it is obvious how insanely smart and well versed Marisol is in the field. I learned to think about a lot of things differently because of her, and would love to take a smaller class to get to know her better.

4.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 17, 2021
Would take again

Great class. super easy make sure to do the readings and you will do great in the class.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
4.0
1.0
ANT2
Grade: A+
Jun 21, 2021
Would take again

A relatively easy and fun class! There definitely is a lot of reading/assigned media, but if you put a little time in it isn't too bad. The professor is also super passionate about the subject so if you engage with the class you'll definitely learn something interesting by the end of the course.*

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Jun 21, 2021
Would take again

Grading based on point system, short responses based off films or reading, and misterms/final were short responses. The class was relatively easy and interesting. There are lots of readings and films/videos to see, but they are all intriguing. I recommend this class!

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 24, 2021
Would take again

2 lectures a week and 8 videos to watch (ranging between 30min to 2 hrs) and each video required a response paper that was graded by TA's. 2 exams that were easy. Never did the readings but attended discussions and watched each lecture. The class taught me a lot about how people thought as a society in the past and was quite eye-opening.

Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Feb 26, 2022
Would take again

I learned so many interesting things in this class and it was pretty easy tbh, I would really recommend to people who need GEs. Everything is basically graded on completion and papers are informal which took all the stress away. Marisols lectures were pretty interesting and the topics were easy. All the readings and videos were interesting too

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
3.0
3.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2022
Would take again

Lectures and content were somewhat redundant, TAs are usually harsh graders for no reason and their feedback does not help much. SO MUCH READING, but assignments are really simple (a couple paragraphs due every few weeks and pop quizzes during discussion). Discussion attendance counts for a grade. Exams are super easy but grading can be annoying.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
ANT002
Grade: Rather not say
Mar 27, 2022

Overrated professor. Gives long lectures where she redundantly rambles about a few key concepts. Response papers were graded harshly and arbitrarily. Syllabus was vague, often modified throughout the quarter, and failed to properly explain how assignments would be graded. You also have to pay for one of the movies. Avoid this professor if possible.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
5.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A-
Mar 28, 2022
Would take again

She gives the exam questions a week before they are due and she even tells you what lectures to find the answers in (lectures are recorded). She assigns a lot of readings but not all of it needs to be done to get an A. There are 5 random quizzes throughout the quarter but the questions are extremely easy (if you did even a little bit of reading).

Get ready to read
4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A-
Apr 4, 2022
Would take again

Honestly, the class was pretty easy. I didn't do any of the readings (b/c there were a ton and very long) and still pulled off an A-. I'm sure if you put more effort than I did, you would get an A. Pretty easy for a 5 unit class. I have heard that the other ANT002 professors are hard. Also, the TAs graded the exams pretty harshly & inconsistently.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Beware of pop quizzes
3.0
3.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Apr 11, 2022

She is FINE, however, I was not very moved by her lectures. I did learn a lot of things from this class and stuff that I didn't know, however, Marisol had inconsistent lectures and sometimes went on rambling past the time. Heard that some TAs grade harshly also so beware. There are also 5 pop quizzes throughout the quarter.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
4.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A-
May 4, 2022
Would take again

She assigns a lot of reading, but tbh I didn't read any of it bc she goes over it all in lectures. My TA was a harsh grader, but other than that the class was very easy and also very insightful. There are two open book written tests and 8 written responses to documentaries. Learn the main points of each lecture and you're good.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 4, 2022
Would take again

I took ANT002 as a GE, honestly best decision I have ever made. She assigned videos and readings that were actually interesting (readings were always discussed in lecture so its fine if you don't really read them). All tests were online and 8 writing assignments are all on the documentaries and pretty easy. Take this class if you can!

Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
Caring
1.0
1.0
ANT191
Grade: B-
Jun 7, 2022

I had an terrible experience in her class. I was given an F in participation even though I attended all of her lectures, the reason she gave me was that 'I was yawning'. Her lectures were unnecesarrily long and not intriguing and she overuse big words which confuses student.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
2.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 7, 2022

If you want an easy class, this is definitely a good GE for you. However, the professor can be off-putting. I usually enjoy participating to class discussion but not only will she interrupt you but also immediately respond by explaining how what you said was wrong or she didn't like a certain part.

Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
1.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Feb 27, 2023

Lectures are redundant. She is disrespectful to the students who do show up in person to her lectures (which is 1/4 of the class), tends to put students on the spot, call them out even if they are going to the restroom. Keeps students after class time and gives off "The bell does not dismiss you, I do" type energy.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Beware of pop quizzes
1.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Feb 27, 2023

Lecture is receptive and boring. The professor over uses her authority and is disrespectful to students. Always finds a reason to be mad at students( i.e. when not coming to lectures when they are not mandatory). Took the class for GE because it sounded fun but she ruined the subject for me. AVOID HER CLASS AT ALL COSTS.

1.0
4.0
ANT002
Grade: Rather not say
Mar 9, 2023

In the syllabus it clearly mentions that the quizzes and participation points will be given in discussion, so the lecture will not be mandatory. The lecture is in the morning, 2 hours, and is very boring. However, in the 9th week (11th week is Final), the Professor suddenly gives a 10-minute in-class quiz that surprises students!

Participation matters
Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Mar 12, 2023

Lectures are long and monotonous. She is disrespectful, calls students out, always seems to have a reason to be upset with students, keeps students after class ends. Assigns an absurd amount of reading as well as a response to a documentary each week. Only positive is that tests are online and open note. Absolutely ruined the subject for me.

Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
2.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Mar 16, 2023

Super boring lectures, didn't show up after week two and got an A+ in the class. Had one video response each week and 2 midterms that consist of short answer responses to lectures + readings. Discussion mandatory. people started not showing up to lecture so she made attendance assignments towards the end of the quarter. Super easy class but boring

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
3.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Mar 27, 2023

is not a high-quality lecture, if you expect this, don't register. the professor is ok for me. luckily this is a TA-based course and I meet the best TA in my college life so far. 5/5 to Mr.Patterson. His discussion is the best. grade by 2exam/8movie response/5quiz in discussion/and general participation point in discussion, fun GE course

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Graded by few things
3.0
2.0
ANT2
Grade: A+
Mar 28, 2023
Would take again

take this class! dont be scared by the 3 rating, shes pretty average and is kind of condescending while speaking but i had the best TA ever and the exams are super reasonable, the workload is also good w a weekly documentary + reading response. i did learn a lot so was overall pretty happy w this class

Clear grading criteria
Graded by few things
2.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Mar 30, 2023
Would take again

the low rating has more to do with prof's personality rather than the contents of the class. she would pressure students into participating during lectures then get mad when no one wanted to show up because of that. TAs carry the class and do basically 100% of the grading. almost weekly but easy hw and 2 exams no final. easy A, esp for a 5 unit GE.

Lecture heavy
2.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A-
Apr 2, 2023

The class was overall pretty simple. We were graded on 5 short quizzes, 2 exams, and a few film responses. The class could be confusing at times but TA's are good. Claims attendance isn't mandatory but gave a quiz during the lecture due to many people not attending.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
4.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Apr 5, 2023
Would take again

This class was really interesting, a heavy focus on climate change. Lecture sometimes went on for too long and she would make people participate when it was clear that nobody really wanted to, which was annoying. That being said, the class was straight forward and made you think. For a 5 unit class, definitely take. TAs are also amazing!

3.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Apr 5, 2023

This class is really easy and honestly pretty interesting, but the lectures were really long and boring at points. I don't think that she is a bad professor, especially given that I learned a lot, but I don't think she is the best either. My TA was incredible at explaining and making the material more interesting and relevant.

2.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
May 24, 2023

Attendance was only mandatory for discussion section, but she got upset no one was coming and did a pop quiz. I tried to go every time, but I think lecture felt extra-optional because the papers were based on film and the midterm and final could be answered by the readings. Definitely get to know your TA and know what their expectations are.

1.0
4.0
ANT002
Grade: B-
Jan 18, 2024

Really ruined the subject for me. Made us watch an animal abuse video to try to show indigenous intelligence and wound up doing the exact opposite. Negative lectures and topics. I also really didn't like my TA for this class.

Lecture heavy
1.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 23, 2024

Attendance and pop quizzes are mentioned, I'll skip. Once some were 30mins late, she got mad and said (quote):"y'all must've got a text message says we have a quiz today, so you are here so late" Next time, she gave a quiz at 10:30 (class start at 10:30). So if you are 3 mins late, you'd lose quite some points. manipulative, rude. Just be careful

Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
1.0
3.0
ANT002
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 23, 2024

Marisol is really aggressive and mean to her student. She did pop quizzes that counts roughly 10 percent of your grade. So you need to go to every lecture to get good grades. Sometimes if you are late for like five minute you missed the quiz. She is also rude to her student, when they come late to do the quiz. It really created a bad learning exp.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
2.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 28, 2024

She changes/adds exam content late in the quarter because she thinks people don't do the reading. Claimed optional attendance but gave pop quizzes and became upset with latecomers, then changed the logistics of quizzes so you can't submit the quiz if you are a few mins late at the beginning of the class, even if you were there when it was assigned.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
ANT002
Grade: Rather not say
Feb 29, 2024

I will not repeat what I have already said.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 29, 2024

Really helpful syllabus, clearly organized files, but does tend to have a problem with students arriving late and penalizing for low participation (even though it isn't necessarily mandatory, she assigns pop quizzes). Her expectations are pretty clear, though most would probably find fault with the way she addresses students.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
2.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Mar 12, 2024

Easy A but professor was a bummer. If she thought a student wasn't listening, she'd ask them a question and then be so mean about their answer (even if accurate) to teach them a lesson in front of hundreds of us. Felt like she was always annoyed with us. Rly sad she didn't have the awareness to see what a hostile learning environment she created.

Beware of pop quizzes
5.0
2.0
ANT02
Grade: A
Mar 18, 2024
Would take again

Honestly a great professor. Her lectures are very interesting although very long. 5 pop quizzes in class and two free response exams that aren't hard at all if you pay attention.

2.0
4.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2024

Class has multiple response papers, 5 pop quizzes and 2 midterms (final is 2nd midterm). The class is an easy A. However, she was difficult to work with especially with the hostile learning environment she created. Her lectures contained a lot of redundancy (she repeated a lot of concepts multiple times. this could be either good or bad).

3.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Mar 31, 2024
Would take again

Lecture/slides are convoluted and rambling. Still, the class was super easy and the material was interesting. Prof tends to speak rudely toward her students, making lecture uncomfortable. People complain about quizzes but they were mentioned in the syllabus and were very easy. They only exist so that people go to class. For 5 units, I recommend.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
3.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Apr 2, 2024
Would take again

I've learned a lot from this class, but the lectures are pretty boring. She does give out 5 pop quizzes throughout the quarter to make people attend lectures. The pop quizzes are really easy. We have to write 8 papers about videos we watch and there are 2 midterms and no final. Overall, the class is really easy.

Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
3.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Apr 23, 2024

Lectures are incredibly slow even on 2x speed. The slides are comically bad... graphic design is not her passion. Easy class. 5 pop quizzes (8.3% of grade), mandatory discussion (16.6%), 2 short answer take home exams (41.67%), and a bunch of documentaries to watch and write a page about (33.3%). I didn't do a single reading and still got an A.

1.0
3.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jun 8, 2024

Extremely rude and would penalize people for being late. Claims attendance isn't mandatory but held in-lecture pop quizzes. Slides are useless for learning and she is so repetitive. Punished the whole class for a few not doing readings. "The bell doesn't dismiss you, I do" vibes. Easy to do well but having her as the professor made it unbearable.

2.0
4.0
ANT144
Grade: Rather not say
Jun 21, 2024

Marisol's teaching style is out of date, with most of the lectures being extremely dry. Makes us go to class and threatened to have pop quizzes. The grading is also very hive minded, being that if you have a different viewpoint you will get punished. Class avg was a B with this class being more like 6 units instead of 4. Unorganized and no rubric.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lots of homework
3.0
2.0
ANT002
Grade: A
Dec 4, 2024

The class is pretty straightforward, with quizzes and easy assignments. However, the professor can be quite abrasive and critical at times, creating an uncomfortable learning environment. Using Unstuckstudy and other study tools like ChatGPT helped me stay on top of the material.

2.0
1.0
ANT002
Grade: A+
Jan 17, 2025

The class was extremely easy. Yes, it is a morning class (10AM), so she heavily focused on attendance which was annoying. She was very critical about attendance and attention of the students, yet lacked the ability to lecture in an engaging way. Random "pop quizzes" which were flashcards given out by TAs when you walked into lecture.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

45%

Textbook Required

35%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

95% confidence
Based on 52 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (25)
A (21)
Not sure yet (6)
Grade Distribution
A(46)B(2)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 62 reported grades
A+: 25
A: 21
Not sure yet: 6
Rather not say: 4
Common Tags
Get ready to read (32)
Participation matters (15)
Lecture heavy (14)
Beware of pop quizzes (14)
Clear grading criteria (13)
LECTURE HEAVY (7)
Graded by few things (6)
Inspirational (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.66 avg change
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jun
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

AHTRO2

5.0

(1)

ANT138

5.0

(1)

ANTH139

5.0

(1)

ANT123

4.0

(1)

ANT139N

4.0

(1)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

AHTRO2

4.0

ANT101

4.0

ANT144

3.2

ANT4

3.0

ANT

3.0

Similar Professors