3.5

Mark Timmons

Philosophy - University of Arizona

3.5
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
53%
Would Retake
84
Reviews
3.5
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
3.3
Helpful
3.7
Clarity

53%

Would Retake

84

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

26

4

26

3

17

2

10

1

5

What Students Say

Just make sure to read the assigned material

PHIL210 - 3.0 rating

Timmons is a great professor

PHILPSY348 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

61%

Textbook Required

67%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 17 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
B (5)
A- (2)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(5)C(2)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 21 reported grades
A: 6
B: 5
A-: 2
A+: 2
Common Tags
Lecture heavy (7)
Get ready to read (6)
Tough grader (5)
Gives good feedback (3)
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES (2)
Beware of pop quizzes (2)
So many papers (2)
Participation matters (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.12 avg change
Dec
Apr
Nov
Dec
May
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

INDIV101

5.0

(1)

PHIL300

5.0

(2)

PHILPSY348

4.5

(2)

PHIL430B

4.0

(1)

INDIV102

4.0

(4)
+10 more courses
Difficulty by Course

INDV104

5.0

INDV070

5.0

IND102

4.0

210

3.8

PHIL430

3.5

Reviews (84)
4.0
4.0
INDV102
Apr 18, 2007

His material is very interesting, especially for INDV 102 (Personal Morality). On the contrary, he is really strict!He wrote the book, and his writing is awful, its EXTREMELY DIFFICULT to understand, english teachers would rip it apart. tests are also hard, so dont expect anything higher then a C unless you attend class everyday!

5.0
4.0
PHIL430
May 7, 2007

Had him for a few classes now. Probably the best professor I've had while at the University of Arizona being here 4 years. That's about all that needs to be said.

3.0
2.0
INDV102
May 17, 2007

I'll be honest- this class is terrible, but was pretty easy. Its an easy A if you just read the book and print out his slides. Theres no reason you should fail this class. He's a rude professor in class and not much is presented- he basically clarifies the readings. It helps to be in class.

4.0
2.0
PHIL430B
Oct 2, 2007

Professor wrote the book and gave attendance quizzes based on readings from the book. However, professor only discussed what's in the book. Perhaps you can see the flaw. If I did and understood the reading, why come to class? If I didn't understand it, what will a quiz prove? Either way, why have one? Professor clearly never thought about this.

1.0
5.0
INDV104
Oct 21, 2008

This class is horrible and so is the teacher. He has no idea what he is talking about. He talks all class about nothing and expects the class to take a test on a book he wrote that is horrible and makes no sense. There needs to be a different teacher available. Could be a cool class if it wasn't for him and his TAs.

2.0
4.0
INDV102
Nov 14, 2008

awful class. dont take it.

5.0
3.0
INDV102
Nov 15, 2008

It's a pretty easy class. You should take it if you are interested in the four controversial topics it covers; and you must be open to both sides of issues. There is no homework, papers, quizzes or mandatory attendance. Just 4 tests and each one is 25% of your grade. The only bad thing is Friday breakout sessions.

3.0
3.0
INDV102
Dec 11, 2008

Not a bad teacher but the class kinda sucks.

4.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 19, 2008

As long as you possess basic reading comprehension skills, this class should be an easy A. There are no papers or comprehensive final, just 4 40-question multiple choice tests based on philosophy articles. The class itself can sometimes be a snoozer, but the articles are actually pretty interesting if you actually take the time to read them.

4.0
3.0
INDV102
Jan 1, 2009

I enjoyed this class. It was interesting learning about people's reasoning behind what they believe and their arguments. The prof. may be confusing at times but once you know the terminology and read the articles assigned it really not so difficult. It's an easy class if you go to the lectures and read the articles.

4.0
2.0
INDV102
Jan 8, 2009

Teacher is kinda werid and scary, especially if you read newspapers during class. But class is really easy, easy tests, no writing. Teacher is clear and interesting!

4.0
1.0
INDIV102
Mar 27, 2009

The class was easy and fairly interresting. There are only 4 multiple choice tests and no homework or papers. He provides review sheets for all the exams. Do those and the readings and its an easy A.

2.0
1.0
INDV102
Mar 31, 2009

Clearly in love with himself. Always talking about his book and how "great" it is. Funny-looking. He'll stare at you if you text, read the newspaper or do anything else in class until you look up. Once he interrogated a kid for walking out of class when he had a nose bleed. Extremely boring!

3.0
2.0
INDV102
Apr 8, 2009

Easy class. Don't have much to say about Timmons, I don't go to class. Just go to your discussion and you will get a B. A few 1 page papers, they take about 30 minutes to do. Take this class for the easy credit.

3.0
2.0
INDV102
Apr 19, 2009

He's very wordy, which can make him hard to understand. But generally, you can pull off a B without going to lecture at all. If your TA is good, I'd recommend going to section, but mine sucks, so I don't bother.

3.0
3.0
INDV102
May 7, 2009

There are some tricky questions on the test but if you know the material well you will do fine

4.0
2.0
INDV102
May 13, 2009

Mark loves two things, his dog Sophie and his book. It is all he refers to during discussion. Not a bad class, especially if you are interested in Philosophy. Study for an hour before each test and do well on the writing assignments and an A is achievable. Decent teacher, loves the subject.

3.0
3.0
INDV102
May 13, 2009

He will tell you the first day that you will have a final on the last day of finals, and that he is unwilling to have any early finals, and to drop if you don't want a last final. That said, I actually enjoyed this class. A bit boring at times, but learning how to argue correctly was interesting.

3.0
2.0
INDV102
May 20, 2009

HORRIBLE CLASS!!! DO NOT TAKE! Unless you are interested in being brainwashed and taking BS completely subjective tests, stay away!!! I went to almost every single lecture and section and did all of the assignments, and still got a B. In a Gen Ed. Not acceptable. The lectures are unbearably boring.

5.0
2.0
INDV102
Jul 19, 2009

ok, i read some of the comments below.. and i'm sorry but unless you're retarded, you should be able to get an A in this class.. i won't deny that the tests are tricky, but i mean come on, you have to study- just read the book (seriously, you have to). Great teacher and GREAT CLASS. I would highly recommend it!

4.0
3.0
INDV102
Aug 4, 2009

A good class overall, READ THE BOOK!! in depth and an A shouldn't be a problem. There are 4 tests and 4 short writing assignments. The test can be tricky but if you read the book and attend class every so often they are actually fair. The writing assignment were very short and fairly easy and straight forward. Interesting class, I learned a lot.

2.0
4.0
INDIV102
Nov 22, 2009

You need to figure out things on your own. Tests cover way more in depth than in class. He doesnt cover what is needed on a test at all.

2.0
4.0
INDV102
Dec 3, 2009

I attended every class, took great notes, read all assignments & also did ALL the study guides & I was confdent about my tests,but when i got the results they just killed me! he is not willing to help you when u need it when i asked to meet him he said go and talk to ur ta & he didnt help me in any way. class is interesting but very hard professor!

4.0
2.0
INDV102
Dec 9, 2009

This is "Personal Morality": a Philoshophy class. I love Psychology & Philosophy so I truly enjoyed the subject. As for the professor, he gives all the necessary info in his lectures and the discussion class is a LIFESAVER for the exams and papers. It was pretty easy to get an A, just take good notes (no laptops allowed) and go to discussion!

2.0
5.0
INDV070
Jan 9, 2010

I had Professor Timmons for Personal Morality. I was extremely interested in the class, and I enjoyed learning the material, but the class is only out of 200 pnts total and only 40 pnts are not from exams. I would not recommend this class to anyone. Too much time is spent listening to ignorant people debate.

5.0
1.0
INDV102
Feb 12, 2010

Easy class. Grade is based on 4 exams and 4 writing assignments. Exams are based off his lectures. You also get a study guide for each exam. Timmons himself is very clear and tries his best to keep our attention.

4.0
3.0
INDV102
Apr 13, 2010

The class was easier than other gen eds. There were only four tests, non-cumulative, and four papers due a week after each test. It was really easy, as long as you studied for about two hours the night before the test. The teacher wasn't the most interesting, but overall not bad. I'd recommend.

3.0
3.0
PHIL213
Apr 20, 2010

Not the best philosophy course I've taken, it's not an easy class but if you come to class everyday(you have to) then you should be ok...his lectures are a bit confusing sometimes

4.0
3.0
INDV102
May 6, 2010

If you go to class, read the book, and study for the tests you will get a B or higher. This class is pretty much an easy B but a hard A.

4.0
2.0
INDV102
May 10, 2010

He was a good teacher, just boring at times

4.0
2.0
INDV102
May 15, 2010

I took Personal Morality and it was an ok class. The material wasn't too difficult, lectures were boring at times but nothing horrible. Tests and papers aren't extremely difficult but you should still study and put some effort.

4.0
2.0
INDV102
May 17, 2010

Really interesting class. The topics we learned about in Personal Morality were relevant to our lives and overall beneficial to learn more about. Teacher was nice and clear about discussing the material. Obviously enjoys the topics, which makes learning easier. 4 papers, 4 tests. Really easy class, but you learn a lot!

4.0
2.0
INDV102
Jun 7, 2010

This professor is my favorite so far. His classes are mostly lecture, but some days students join in making it more of a discussion. The topics are interesting and relevant. Anyone who likes debates will love this class. And you will never know his stance on any topic which is a pleasant change from most other professors. 4 2-pg papers & 4 tests.

2.0
4.0
INDV102
Nov 21, 2010

Not easy. The work to get an A in this class is not worth it for a gen ed. He's very unclear and loves switching back and forth between slides just fast enough for you to not write them down. Slides are unclear, so go to class. The class is pretty pointless and you don't really have a say in opinion, it's very one-sided. Most of his TAs suck.

5.0
3.0
INDV102
Nov 21, 2010

Tests may be hard if you don't attend class. About 90% of the material in the test can be found from the slides which he conveniently posts, he also posts a study guide a couple days prior to his exams which are also very useful.

5.0
2.0
INDIV101
Dec 1, 2010

The tests were easy as long as you either attended the lectures or read the text book. He really explains what the authors in the text book are saying, so it was more helpful for me to go to class. Attendance not mandatory. Multiple choice tests.

3.0
3.0
INDV102
Dec 4, 2010

Personal Morality is a the most boring class I have ever taken. Topics seem interesting, but they are not. Read the book, its the only way to pass the tests. And it would be your benefit to show up to lecture if you can stay awake through the whole thing, which is impossible.

5.0
1.0
INDIV102
Dec 6, 2010

Timmons is a clear teacher. Personal morality is not hard at all and very interesting. You have to read to do well on the tests, but if you attend lectures, the book is easy to understand and read. Good class.

5.0
2.0
INDV102
Dec 8, 2010

As long as you read and attend lecture you should be more than fine. Professor Timmons is extremely clear in the important points of every article and tells you everything you need to know for the test. There is no cumulative final but rather 4 tests and 3 papers. Would definitely recommend this class, I found it extremely interesting.

5.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 13, 2010

Super easy class. Everything you need to know is on the slides. Never read the book and got an A in the class. Just know the basic concepts.

5.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 13, 2010

Super easy class. Everything you need to know is on the slides. Never read the book and got an A in the class. Just know the basic concepts.

4.0
2.0
INDV102
Dec 15, 2010

Very easy class but only if you attend the lectures and discussion sessions. On all the papers they spell out for you what you need to write. I think I missed 2 points on tests and papers combined this whole semester.

5.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 16, 2010

This class is extremely easy. Pay attention in class, go to discussions. The papers are just reiterations of what you study, this class requires almost no critical thinking skills at all. Made for a very very easy A.

5.0
2.0
INDIV102
Dec 18, 2010

Timmons has a great class. His class is very interesting. Although he said that class is mandatory, it really isn't. To get an A you must go to discussions, although not mandatory, at the end it will bump your grade is on the cusp. Very interesting topic and Timmons knows alot and is a great prof.

3.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 19, 2010

Class content was boring unless you can get into it. But super easy. If you can actually go and sit through the lectures, you'll be fine.

3.0
4.0
IND102
Dec 27, 2010

I took this class because I needed a gen ed. My roommate took it previously and she recommended it. It was an good class ,the topics we covered we're very interesting. The tests were a little difficult because they were conceptual as well as straight facts. Also there were three essays during the semester. Use office hours and read the book!

3.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 29, 2010

It was ridiculously easy to get an A in this class. I recommend skipping lecture and going to discussion - your TA will review everything from lecture that week. No homework other than three 1-2 page papers and there are four tests, all multiple choice. Read the book/powerpoints before the tests and you'll do fine.

4.0
1.0
INDV102
Dec 29, 2010

Although neither the lectures or discussions are mandatory, he often includes information on the test that he only will talk about in the lecture and if you have a borderline grade and attend discussion a lot, you're more likely to get a higher grade. Finally the topics are pretty interesting, I can't see why you wouldn't go to the lectures.

4.0
2.0
INDV102
Feb 7, 2011

Easy class if you go to class, take notes, read the book, and go to discussion. If you don't do any of this, you will not do well on tests or papers.

5.0
1.0
INDV102
Apr 15, 2011

Easy class if you show up. You are pretty much guaranteed an A if you do the study guides before each of the four tests. Also the three essays pretty much only consist of restating information on the powerpoints

4.0
2.0
PHIL150B
Nov 7, 2011

I find the class extremely boring. I never show up and do really well on all the tests. Go to discussion and read the text book and you will be fine.

2.0
3.0
PHIL150
Nov 7, 2011

sitting in his class right now. so boreddd. dont go to class just discussion. class is easy as long as you put study time in

5.0
1.0
PHIL150
Nov 22, 2011

Timmons seems like a really nice guy. His class is really boring (at least for me) but it's very easy. I get away with coming to class once a week and still get A's on the tests and essays. If you read the articles and have common sense, then you should do fine. It helps to be a good writer; you'll pretty much assured an A.

5.0
1.0
PHIL150
Dec 9, 2011

He is a fairly biased professor in choosing what moral theories to present. The class can be pretty boring, but if you are interested in social issues or something like that, then it could be fun. It is so easy that it is a joke, just try not to let your work slack on the last unit of the course, which is pretty boring.

5.0
2.0
PHIL150
Dec 13, 2011

Prof. Timmons is a great professor, he is great at presenting the material and proving adequate notes. The discussions are always lively and I would recommend the class. The first units sexual morality, abortion, and animal treatment are very interesting, but the torture/terrorism unit was really boring.

3.0
4.0
PHIL150
Dec 16, 2011

Timmons was interesting, but the lectures just moved in a circle. They got super boring. Thankfully its a huge class and you can just go to your discussion and get all the info. The readings are a must! His tests are tricky. Pay super attention :/

3.0
2.0
PHIL210
May 15, 2012

His lectures definitely go in circles and just reiterate what is in his books. Just make sure to read the assigned material. I had a D all semester and then got an A in the class, go figure.

5.0
3.0
PHIL300
Grade: A-
Dec 12, 2013

Literally wrote the book on ethics. He can be a bit long-winded if you get the material quickly, but makes sure he's crystal clear about whatever he's talking about. He's also very clear with his requirements, assignments, and grading, which makes your life much easier. Overall, good quality, very fair, very knowledgeable, and passionate.

5.0
1.0
PHILPSY348
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
May 6, 2014

Timmons is a great professor! We had 4 papers due (Including midterm and final) He is very clear on how he grades the papers, no homework. Does give random quizzes (3 questions.) My midterm and final was pretty much take home. Best class I've taken at the University of Arizona.

3.0
3.0
PHIL210
Grade: B
Jun 7, 2014

His lectures reiterate his book material. I found this class to be confusing because of the reiteration. Basically a bunch of memorizing different moral theories. A little hard for a gen ed.

5.0
3.0
210
Grade: A-
Jun 8, 2015

First time I took an upper division philosophy class and I was nervous but this professor was always clear with his lectures and requirements. The feedback he gave was awesome and if you go to class you often get extra credit, which saved a lot of my classmates. I missed the final because I overslept and he still let me make it up. Great guy.

3.0
3.0
PHIL210
Nov 2, 2015

Pretty dry lectures, but really easy. 3 papers and 2 exams. The papers are easy if you just look up the topic and form your own opinion or regurgitate the general information about it. Exams are a bit harder. He gives 10 pop quizzes that all count as extra credit (saved my grade). As long as you pay attention this is common sense stuff.

5.0
2.0
PHIL210
Grade: A
Dec 2, 2015

Solid professor with a good knowledge of his subject. Lectures are clear, and the coursework is not too difficult. If you can to take his class for a major requirement, definitely do it. Hes' quite good, but if you aren't into his subject of moral theory, I wouldn't tell anyone to go out of their way to take his class.

3.0
4.0
PHIL210
Apr 13, 2016

He rambles a lot and it's weird that you buy his book and read it then he lectures over his own book that he wrote. He assigned several papers that were graded pretty roughly, don't expect to do well if your a half-ass it kind of student. Supplemental reading is important if you want to do well on papers/tests. good lectures.

5.0
4.0
PHIL210
Grade: B
May 14, 2016

Professor Mark Timmons is a great professor and a brilliant mind. Don't take this course thinking its going to be an easy A. He has very high standards for his papers and if you don't give full effort you will fail his essays.I think he gives these high standards because he wants to get rid of the students that don't care.

4.0
4.0
PHILPSY348
Oct 31, 2016
Would take again

Lecture heavy

Gives good feedback
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
PHIL210
Grade: C
Dec 9, 2017
Wouldn't take again

THIS IS NOT AN EASY CLASS!!!! For a Gen-Ed it's easy at all! It is a very confusing class and the topics are super hard. If you're good at writing you will probably do pretty well. His book is helpful but you will need to study a lot

Tough Grader
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
4.0
3.0
PHIL210
Grade: A+
Dec 10, 2018
Would take again

My major involves a lot of philosophy so I found this class very interesting, but if that's not your thing this class will probably suck. I thought Timmons was an easy to fair grader; I never had a problem getting A's on papers because all of the info you need for the class is in his book. He's a very nice guy and knows what he's talking about.

5.0
3.0
PHIL210
Grade: A
Dec 14, 2018
Would take again

I personally really enjoyed Professor Timmons class. He very knowledgable in ethics and moral theory and I learned a lot. Also, he wrote the book we used in this class, so if you don't understand the lecture you can find everything in the book. That being said, people who aren't familiar with philosophy will probably struggle a bit in his class.

4.0
4.0
PHIL210
Mar 21, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Passionate professor who lives and breathes philosophy. I highly suggest going to office hours to get clarification on papers (majority of your grade) and attending class to earn easy quiz points. He is very thorough so lectures are long and dense, but class is not impossible if you pay attention.

Graded by few things
Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
PHIL210
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 15, 2019
Would take again

Pretty great professor, very intelligent. Class is lecture heavy but if you pay attention and go to class it's totally doable. The assigned reading is his own book which makes the class a lot easier. If you're interested in philosophy I highly recommend his class!

Clear grading criteria
Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
4.0
1.0
PHIL210
Grade: A
Oct 10, 2019
Would take again

Really easy class, most of the grade is based on the three papers which are pretty easy to write. The only thing is that his lectures can get a bit boring at times, but the subject matter is really interesting.

4.0
5.0
PHIL210
Grade: C+
May 15, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Grades are based on a few assignments that are worth a lot so if you don't pick up on his teaching style and what he wants immediately it'll be your downfall. I sucked on the first assignment and I figured it out for the remaining ones but the first one basically pulled my grade. He is also a little snippy and I didn't feel comfortable asking ?'s

Respected
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
PHIL430
Jun 17, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Throughout this course, Mark spent the entire semester bullying the one gay student in the class. His lectures are uninspired and he literally had us watch a video for an entire lecture like it was high school. If you're looking for ethical inspiration, look elsewhere. Anyone can have a theory about morality, but very few actually embody it.

1.0
2.0
PHIL210
Grade: B
Nov 4, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Good at lecturing, but shamed people by suddenly cutting himself off ing at anyone quietly entering/leaving. Shamed people who slept. Chill, dude--lecture is important, but not all college students have life figured out&they prob feel worse about it than u do. Also had a middle A prior to final, midterm&final same level but rando harsh grading

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
PHIL210
Grade: A
Dec 7, 2020
Would take again

His lectures and essay assignments really help you understand the course material and are super easy to understand. He is also very accommodating to meet with you outside of class time and answer any questions. But, if you are not a fan of reading or writing I would not take his course as more than 90% of the grade is based on essays.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
So many papers
1.0
5.0
PHIL210
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 9, 2022

He gives very little feedback when you do poorly.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
PHIL210
Grade: A
Apr 28, 2022
Would take again

This class is set up in a way that makes comprehension really easy -- reading assignments twice a week before each lecture, then the lecture thoroughly explains the reading and clears up any confusion. Lectures can be a bit boring at times, but Mark is really good at explaining difficult philosophical concepts, especially since he wrote the book

2.0
4.0
210
Nov 4, 2022

This teacher lectures based on his reading assignments. Strict grader when it comes to the criteria of the paper. Will answer your questions with complicated vocabulary and doesn't usually elaborate.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
4.0
3.0
210
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2022
Would take again

This class had 5 papers and a 4 point quiz every week. He wants the papers to be written as an explanation or application for what you have learned and doesn't look for creative writing. I did well on all the essays but have friends who struggled. If you ask for clarification you'll be fine. He's very knowledgeable but lectures can be boring.

Get ready to read
So many papers
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
210
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Dec 13, 2022

At the beginning of the year I was forced to take this class for a Gen Ed credit. I decided to be optimistic and stay in the class and completed the first paper assigned. Unfortunately this was a mistake when I was hit with an F on my very first paper and exceptionally rude feedback. I'm sorry I'm a freshman that doesn't understand/need philosophy.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
PHIL210
Grade: B
Dec 15, 2022

Only required material was the textbook he wrote, felt really good to pay him a premium on top of my tuition. Feedback on essays is harsh yet uninformative, and it felt like everything was graded pretty subjectively. Course material is interesting enough but he gets mad argumentative when you ask questions, usually being pretty rude about it too.

Tough grader
Participation matters
5.0
4.0
PHIL300
Grade: A+
May 15, 2023
Would take again

Mark Timmons is one of the best professors I had. Contrary to the eclectic image of a philosophy professor, he is attainable, friendly, and engaging. He is meticulous and clear in his lectures. His meticulous and detailed approach towards his lectures influenced my own approach towards litigation later in life as an attorney. And he is a good guy.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Inspirational
5.0
4.0
PHIL210
Grade: B
Nov 12, 2024
Would take again

Out of the 4 PHIL courses I've taken, Timmons is by far the best professor. He will test your knowledge but give you the best feedback you can receive. The papers are very difficult and heavily weighted but showing up and engaging in class is useful. If you are required to take this class, you will not like him at first but give him some time.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

61%

Textbook Required

67%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 17 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
B (5)
A- (2)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(5)C(2)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 21 reported grades
A: 6
B: 5
A-: 2
A+: 2
Common Tags
Lecture heavy (7)
Get ready to read (6)
Tough grader (5)
Gives good feedback (3)
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES (2)
Beware of pop quizzes (2)
So many papers (2)
Participation matters (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.12 avg change
Dec
Apr
Nov
Dec
May
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

INDIV101

5.0

(1)

PHIL300

5.0

(2)

PHILPSY348

4.5

(2)

PHIL430B

4.0

(1)

INDIV102

4.0

(4)
+10 more courses
Difficulty by Course

INDV104

5.0

INDV070

5.0

IND102

4.0

210

3.8

PHIL430

3.5

Similar Professors