Boring, unknowledgable.

those who can do, do. those who cant, teach.

1)prepare before lectures 2) show up on time

No Comments

the most ridiculous assignments i've ever seen - long, boring and pointless

Nice guy--KILLER ASSIGNMENTS! cant teach arrays methods and objects

his lectures are designed to get people to drop out, it seems....

Surely knows what's going on!

*looks at clock.. thinks to himself only 5 mins late! oh ya!

No Comments

No Comments

No Comments

unclear,nervous,unorganized, late

Unprofessional attitude

is this class some sorta joke? i learned 0. A monkey could have taught me more!

what prof? i didn't know we had one!!

No Comments

A Chair is not a Desk, But is apparently a Variable.

No Comment!

See ya next semester, I learn more from eating stale cheese.

He's ok. Better than Dr.Evil Dobo....but not as cool as Morton

Was of no help to the course at all

No Comments

No idea what he is doing......sometimes forgets to show up for class

Okay, isn't there something in the undergraduate calendar about giving out a semester plan with due dates on it at the beginning of the semester? Yeah, this guy ought to try making one up so he doesn't have to pull due dates out of the air later.

unclear, bad assignments (ill be damned if i understand him), only good thing abotu his class is watchign everyone leave, worth it because other teachers make fun of him

He is very lazy guy and he is not clear about what he is saying

Needs to Work on Presentation

No one can deny it -- he known his stuff. But holy hell is he boring. I'm sitting in class right now, there are exactly 20 people. Class is of 50+. On their laptops: 10 On their phones: 6 Asleep: 1 Paying attention: 3 Ooop, reduce that to 2 people paying attention. Someone just reached for their phone. Awful professor, crazy knowledge

Mark definitely knows his stuff, it's just the way he is presenting that is awful about his teaching. He spends an entire slide, literally 20 mins on one specific slide and talks about it while no one is paying attention. He then goes on to the other more important slides and skips over them in a couple of minutes, even seconds!

I'm gonna be honest if you know what you're doing you'll probably still fail his assignments, in the last 3 assignments i had witht his guy he made a total of 16 edits all of then within the last 5 days of the due date. He's so unclear about the assignments which need i remind you are worth over 40% of your mark. Plus he won't give extensions.

This guys a goof. He drops assignments that have little to no correlation with what he is teaching you in the lectures. You must learn how to do most of the programming yourself, which is difficult for those who don't have much previous experience.

assignment instructions are never clear, on top of that, they involve the need for concepts we Never learned in class. never responds to emails

I swear this man wrote his assignments at 3 am on a Friday night without even worrying about if they made any sense. Never responded to my email concerns, even after I went to his office hours and he gave me another email. I'm glad CS is a field where you can teach yourself, because that's all I did.

This man is probably the most confused professor I've ever encountered. He was constantly sending out emails updating his assignments because he made mistakes in writing them, one of these updates came after the assignment was due. If you have the option to avoid him, please do.

Literally does not teach. He always goes over time on lectures, despite not actually saying anything for most of them. He has gotten stuck on the same Powerpoint slide for over an hour because of constantly going off on tangents. Assignments come with no instructions or examples, you're just left to GUESS what he wants.

"You will have spare time for the midterm", final words before a total disaster of a midterm. Nobody finished it. This prof couldn't give a proper lecture if his life depended on it. He does not care about his students at all and laughed at multiple people in lecture who complained about workload. Not just a bad prof, a bad person.

Worst prof I've ever had at Guelph. Lectures are excruciatingly slow/boring. Never given an interesting lecture, rambles incoherently. Assignment descriptions are vague, frequently changes them, has to add pages full of Q&A from confused students. Totally overwhelmed by this course and the number of assessments for very little %. Haven't learned

If you can avoid this "prof" please do. He's a disaster, especially online. Lectures are boring and don't help. Slides are just copied from the textbook and make no sense. Assignment descriptions are vague and none of the material is learnable online. If you ever have questions he will rarely answer an email and if he does it's just vague guidance.

Absolutely terrible. The worst prof at Guelph, by far.

this man SUCKS, If you put Mark Wineberg next to a vacuum, the vacuum would want to be called a mop. He has no passion for teaching, he talks a lot but nothing makes sense. very vague. used someone else's powerpoints and cant communicate at all.

Wineberg has a good heart and you are able to see this by how fast he jumps to help you one on one. It sucks that he isn't as strong of a lecturer. When he does lecture nothing makes sense due to his tangents. His assignments offer no instruction and for the most part you are left guessing, which its hard to get help through covid.

Wineberg tries to be a good professor, he just isn't. He's one of the most monotone lecturers I've ever had, which makes his classes boring to attend, to the point where most of the class can't focus. His CIS 3260 class had an insane workload, to the point where it the busiest class I have taken. He also broke 2 Uni policies with assignments

Very disorganized, many assignments had to be constantly updated throughout the semester due to poor communication. Had several issues during the server implementation during this course, grades came back months and months later. The codeless codes were graded arbitrarily, pushed deadlines into the exam week and on top of that graded harshly.

After 4/5 years as a software engineering student at UoG, this is the first time I actually felt like it was my duty to inform students what they will endure with this professor. Lectures are slow, marking is extremely slow. I have an idea of my mark for all other classes but i only know the marks for 5/12 tasks. AWFUL. Would give 0 if i could!

It has been halfway through the semester and every will is begging me to warn other students about him. You are better off asking your girlfriend what she wants to eat than asking Wineberg on what he wants for an assignments because I do not think that he even know if it is right approach or not.

This is his first time teaching this course and it is extremely apparent he has no idea what he's doing. Lectures are slow and useless. The group project that is the main focus of this course has been incredibly poorly defined, and written feedback is replaced with a zoom call where it feels like he's making up the project requirements as he marks.

The lab times were used for lectures. Assignment descriptions were vague and confusing.

blud needs to game end himself. I guess he's funny the way everyone thinks he's a joke. He look like peter griffin from fort so I guess he's cool.

Wineberg is inspirational in the sense that he inspires his students to want to crash out. Leave it to peter griffin to turn a 3rd year, 0.5 credit, DESIGN course into the most demanding, convoluted, and pointless yap sesh of your university career. You can tell this man has hit the rock bottom of academia... Clearly industry wouldn't touch him...

Lab time was used as lectures, unclear grading guidelines, outdated slides, poor communication with the TA leading to grading mistakes, slides had mistakes he claimed had been there for years but have yet to fix, grading assignments took ages, solutions were never released despite promised to and required for later assignments. STAY AWAY FROM HIM!