3.3

Mary-Kay Gamel

Literature - University of California Santa Cruz

3.3
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
83
Reviews
3.3
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
3.3
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

83

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

30

4

13

3

14

2

13

1

13

What Students Say

well, the worst professor I've had in college yet

LIT61M - 1.0 rating

Interesting class, it's lit, it's confusing

LIT61M - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

71% confidence
Based on 7 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (3)
A (2)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 7 reported grades
A+: 3
A: 2
B: 1
B+: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.25 avg change
Dec
Jan
Mar
Jun
Oct
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HIS80

5.0

(1)

LIT061M

5.0

(1)

HIST60

5.0

(1)

MEDEA

5.0

(1)

61M

5.0

(2)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HIS21

5.0

ANCIENTMYTH

5.0

CLASSICMYTH

5.0

CLASSMYTH

5.0

COMSEXLIT123

5.0

Reviews (83)
3.0
2.0
LIT61M
Feb 28, 2003

Interesting class, it's lit, it's confusing. Excited about what she teaches, goes very in depth, just read and you'll do fine.

4.0
3.0
MYTHLIT
Mar 3, 2003

Interesting Course, Excited Prof, but the massive amount of material prevented any one work from being examined in detail. Too much to cover, not enough time.

3.0
2.0
LIT001
Apr 11, 2003

Gamel's class was filled with all the excitement fascination and fun of a dictionary, but without the usefulness.

5.0
2.0
HIS80
Apr 22, 2003

She's a cool teacher. She knows what she's talking about.

5.0
2.0
LIT61M
Aug 2, 2003

Massive amount of material, but she knows what she's talking about and knows how to relate the texts to the students.

4.0
2.0
LIT61M
Nov 8, 2003

Knows her stuff, and she imparts it!! Tons of info in lecture, hope you can write fast! Really interesting, decent group of guest lecturers. Keep up on the reading and you'll do fine. Don't be intimidated by the amount of it either.

5.0
3.0
LIT061M
Nov 8, 2003

Enthusiastic about lectures, entertaining. Reading load is very light for a lit class (about 100 pgs/week). Extra credit available, lecture notes online. http://humanities.ucsc.edu/classicalmyth

3.0
2.0
LIT61M
Dec 5, 2003

Very boring professor, obsessed with phallic symbolism and sex, makes mistakes with pop culture references. Took good texts and made them dull. Good reading, but annoying professor. Doesn't delve enough into texts. Very easy class, though.

1.0
4.0
HIST21
Dec 11, 2003

made a subject very boring and her grade scale is not very fair. In order to get an a + extra credit must be done. Points scale very unfair because final worth too many pts. Points done not by percentage but done by points itself. Very lopsided.

1.0
5.0
HIST21
Jan 5, 2004

scoring very bad

5.0
3.0
LIT61
Feb 15, 2004

Mary-Kay rules! An extremely intelligent and educated woman, she managed to make us all feel like her friends in a 550 person class. Impressive presentation, funny as all get-out, and extremely appreciative of student creativity and ideas and her TAs.

2.0
3.0
LIT61M
Feb 16, 2004

ohmigod i hated this class... ugh. i thought it would be interesting but myth really is as stupid as i thought it was in high school. and she is obsessed with sex, and she makes weird exclamations in the middle of lecture like "waaouah!"

2.0
3.0
LIT61M
Mar 3, 2004

boring. sitting through her lectures were painful at times. i really liked he TA David Namie's lecture on the symposium. overall, she's an eccentric lady who needs to kick it up a notch

5.0
3.0
HIST60
Mar 17, 2004

I thought she was a really good teacher. She was funny and extremely intelligent. I got a fairly easy A, you just have to do all of the reading and not fall behind.

3.0
3.0
LIT61
Apr 25, 2004

It may be because of the size of the class, but professor Gamel has one of the worst testing systems ever, multiple choice tests are not apporiate for a college course. She gets extremely over excitied during lectures, but is top of stuff in cont.inter

5.0
2.0
LIT61M
May 17, 2004

Cloud-herding Mary Kay is awesome. In a class of 500, we felt like her friends, and she made the study of mythology a hilarious and fascinating ride. She works with wonderful, and for once qualified, TAs, and is very sensible about running a classroom.

2.0
4.0
LIT61M
May 18, 2004

Completely unreasonable and difficult to talk to. Lectures are boring with unapproachable amounts of outside work. Even did the extra credit and couldn't raise my grade.

1.0
5.0
LIT61M
May 23, 2004

she's a good speaker, puts the notes online-but they won't help you pass her impossible 200+ multiple choice tests. 3 tests and extra credit is your grade; HUGE curve though. interesting lectures, but they didn't help you pass the tests. TA David Namie=A+

5.0
2.0
MEDEA
May 24, 2004

took a frosh introductory course on medea by her - very fun, lots of good movies, interesting ideas are presented.. she grades a little too hard on the one project though, and she was easy for me to get along with. pay attention and be respectful.

4.0
3.0
LIT61M
Jun 2, 2004

You need to be in lecture to pass this class... even though the notes on online, if you plan not to read or attend lecture, don't enroll. Mary-Kay's insight is essential to understanding the topics. If you read, go to class, you'll be good.

5.0
5.0
HIS021
Jun 3, 2004

Lots of reading

5.0
4.0
61M
Jun 8, 2004

Mary Kay is an excellent lecturer. She made mythology very interesting. Be prepared to work and read, but also to learn a lot about history and literature. I loved this class.

5.0
4.0
LTIN104
Sep 14, 2004

Mary-Kay is the best ever. I love her. Her class was very interesting and fun. She was very personable and helpful. Always considerate as to the understanding of material. I definately recommend taking her classes!

5.0
3.0
HIS021
Sep 20, 2004

Awesome class,very interesting lectures,she is enthusiastic.She even let me take the final the next quarter because I was so sick the day of the exam. But she did take the whole next quarter to give me the exam, then the whole following quarter to grade i

5.0
1.0
LIT61M
Oct 12, 2004

She is the greatest! She makes Classical Myth fun!

1.0
5.0
HIS21
Oct 20, 2004

yall r crazy....hard class that goes too fast...i hate myth cuz of her

1.0
5.0
LIT61
Oct 26, 2004

that professor is horrible, she tells you she'll post information online, and then doesn't, and when she does it's late. her lectures are boring and confusing, and her tests are ridiculously hard and have confusing wording. there are no sections, but there is a review session before each test.

2.0
4.0
LIT61M
Oct 30, 2004

She has good intentions but her lectures are very confusing and face-paced and there is no clarification made. The tests...ugh. I don't think there's a way to study for them.

3.0
3.0
LIT61M
Grade: A+
Nov 1, 2004

The class isn't hard if you do the reading like she says, and there are office hours if you need help on most things, like studying for exams. The only problem is her clarity: she blazes through lectures, leaving you to wonder what the hell she just talked about. Alright overall.

4.0
2.0
HIS021
Nov 2, 2004

She was hilarious and great, although I didn't necessarily like all the reading. Sections would have been more helpful.

5.0
3.0
MYTH
Nov 2, 2004

She was a great teacher and her class was super interesting. I got an A in it because I did all of the reading and went to all of the classes. People who complain about the class didn't do their work and expected an A anyway. Take is if you are willing to put in the effort. She is fair and nice!

4.0
3.0
LIT61M
Nov 5, 2004

go to lecture and take notes... read the assigned text... thats all you need to do to pass

3.0
2.0
LIT61
Nov 5, 2004

I loved Mary-Kay's occasional quirks. Greek myth is so weird and awesome. If you already know a great deal of myth, this course won't be as exciting for you. If you don't like reading, you're lost here. As long as you read and review you'll do fine on the tests.

2.0
5.0
LIT61M
Nov 9, 2004

She doesnt care if students learn. Test on slides that are not posted on internet. No way to study for ridiculously hard tests. Tests contain 50% trick questions. 20 hours of studying will bring you C-. Poor translations of interesting works. She teaches her opinion as if it were fact.

1.0
5.0
LIT61M
Nov 10, 2004

Her idea of a study guide is "know EVERYTHING we read". Her lectures are boring and even if you study for 5 hours a day every day you still will probably get only a C if you are lucky. 1/3 of the class failed the first test and 1/4 failed the second. The Guest speakers and TA's are awesome though

5.0
3.0
61M
Nov 15, 2004

the class is easy if you just read and go to it. mary-kay is awesome, a wonderful woman. her lectures are interesting, she knows everything about ancient greece and she's very nice and helpful. couldn't respect her more. good sense of humor too.

2.0
3.0
HIST21
Nov 17, 2004

She doesn't approach teaching this class in a good way. You have to know petty details like when a certain piece was written. The only good thing about this class was that the tests were always multiple choice. Sorry, Gamel. Better luck next time.

4.0
4.0
LIT60M
Nov 22, 2004

Very interesting and funny!!!

5.0
1.0
HIST21
Nov 23, 2004

THIS IS THE EASIEST CLASS EVER. People who complain about how unfair the professor is, or how hard the class is, really have no idea what a college course asks for. The professor does very well with an imperfect situation.

5.0
1.0
HIST21
Nov 23, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
MYTH
Nov 27, 2004

Gamel butchers the most interesting subject of Greek Myth into a vehicle of her own opinion. Films and guest lecturers are terrible. Translations of required readings are not always the best. No way to study for the test, a week of studying brings you a C. Don't take this class.

2.0
5.0
LIT61M
Grade: A
Dec 9, 2004

The lectures were generally very boring, her outlines were atrocious, and while she seemed to have a masterful command over the subject, she did not convey the information in a very organized manner.

2.0
4.0
LIT20
Dec 15, 2004

Gamel was horrible! She turned off my interest in mythology and made my first quarter back to school a nightmare. Her tests were unbelieveably hard, because her questions were totally unreasonable. She expects you to know tedious details about text readings.. Do not Take her class!

3.0
4.0
LIT61
Dec 17, 2004

Tests are ridiculously hard. If half the class is failing, that means there is something wrong, and its not the students. I found that the more I studied, the worse I did in the class. Trick Questions, big time. Her test review are worthless, all she tells you is to study everything.

3.0
2.0
HIST21
Dec 25, 2004

If you know the main points from the secondary sources and read the plays, you will be fine. Study hard and it is not hard to get an A. Some lectures are kind of boring, but the selection of primary readings (all plays) are very interesting. Mary-Kay's interpretation of the works is interesting.

3.0
4.0
HIST21
Jan 3, 2005

I got a b+ in this class but i have no idea how, the tests were hard, questions misleading, lectures nonsensical and study guides only semihelpful

3.0
4.0
LIT61M
Jan 4, 2005

my recommendation, don't bother taking this class. tests were very difficult and review sessions were no help. lectures were boring. don't waste your time or risk your gpa.

5.0
3.0
LIT60H
Jan 30, 2005

Mary Kay's class has become a gathering place for couch potatoes looking for the course equivalent of a video game. Fortunately it isn't that but it is a serious and fascinating course that opens up new worlds. Unfortunately scantron tests don't do justice to what is really interesting.

2.0
3.0
LIT61M
Grade: B
Feb 25, 2005

Mary-Kay is a theater geek. She teaches this course because she did her PhD work on the Metamorphoses and directs plays like those read in the course. Tests were tricky. Went to class and review sessions only to see slides. Read whats assigned and you will get a B for sure.

4.0
1.0
LIT61M
Mar 12, 2005

If you don't go to lecture, you're not going to do well in this class. If you don't read you will not either. This was the easiest class I have ever taken and those who say otherwise were probably just lazy.

5.0
1.0
LIT61M
Mar 14, 2005

I don't know what you guys are talking about... this class was easy if you read the material as closely as you're supposed to. Studying doesn't mean "read it once and hope the test will be on superficial plot points." I love myth, and I loved this class.

5.0
1.0
MYTH
Mar 29, 2005

she is a great teacher and her class was really interesting. you need to do the reading and come to class to get an A, but there are NO tricks. Take this class if you are willing to put in some effort, and are interested in the subject.

2.0
4.0
HIST21
Apr 6, 2005

The teacher for this class was very unfair. This was the second time that i was taking it and i still barely passed. For the final she didnt give us the slides that we needed and that hurt many peoples grades. She is very biased and does not treat students who are stuggling with the same respect.

3.0
4.0
CLASSICALMYTH
Apr 11, 2005

This was advertised as a history class - well, Mary Kay Gamel is a literature professor and a theater buff. So, history majors, beware - this will NOT be what you expect out of a history class. The reading is BO-RING, tests are unfair and lectures disorganized. Don't bother.

3.0
4.0
HIS21LTEL140B
May 12, 2005

I've had her for 2 classes. She is very smart and gives thorough, intelligent lectures. BUT- she talks fast and her "outline" notes are too sparse and unclear. Most of the stuff she covers in lecture is not the test which adds to further confusion. Study terms + who said them and the primary texts.

5.0
3.0
LTEL140B
Jun 6, 2005

Mary-Kay is fabulous, but ya gotta work. Her class is not the type where you read things once and skate. You need to read often and closely and attend every lecture. Put in the time and you will do well. She's also very attached to her email:I've emailed her and gotten responses very quickly even to stupid questions. Very open to new ideas.

3.0
1.0
CLASSICALMYTH
Jun 8, 2005

This class was a bore, and scantron tests in the lit. dept. are inexcusable. The lectures were densly packed with outline "points" of little interest, but no real engagement with or criticism of the texts is encouraged.

4.0
3.0
LIT61M
Grade: B+
Aug 31, 2005

No Comments

4.0
2.0
LIT61M
Sep 23, 2005

Do not underestimate the "intro low-div" status of this class, because you must put in the time to get the grade. Read closely, take GOOD notes, & DO NOT DEPEND ON THE OUTLINE b/c it is an OUTLINE, not a silver platter with your notes on it. Study, read, highlight, ask, listen, blah.. BE A STUDENT basically.

5.0
5.0
ANCIENTMYTH
Sep 29, 2005

Mary-Kay was my professor for my senior seminar, ancient myth modern poetics. This was the best class I had at UCSC, I only wish I had the class sooner. Of all my professors she showed the most passion for the subject, and was incredibly helpful in and out of the classroom. She encouraged our writing in a way that seemed as if it was personal. It is too bad that some seem to have taken her class with an attitude that class should be easy and that you shouldn't have to work at all to get something out of it.

2.0
3.0
FILMVIOLENCE
Grade: A
Sep 29, 2005

I think this last person who wrote IS Mary Kay Gamel; or else one of her zombie minions. If you work hard in almost ANY class you will learn. The point here is that as a lecturer she is boring, incomprehensible and completely off the mark.

1.0
4.0
CLASSICALMYTH
Oct 3, 2005

If you are thinking taking a class with this woman, i suggest getting a demo of her teaching style by going downtown santa cruz and asking a bum on meth his/her opinion on mythology, as the twitching glassy eyed transient barks inchoherent convoluted words at you and staggers about preaching his opinions you will see what to expect from Ms. Gammel

5.0
4.0
MYTH
Nov 3, 2005

She is a tough cookie, but it makes for a good class. She packs in a ton of info, which means a lot of reading. Surprisingly challenging scantron tests.

3.0
3.0
CLASSICALMYTH
Jan 8, 2006

Even though the subject was interesting and the lectures was interesting, you really need to read the books and take the class a little more seriously than you normally would've. Her tests are kinda hard =/

1.0
5.0
CLASSICMYTH
Jan 30, 2006

Avoid at all cost! Scantrons are too difficult with a****ty study guide offering little support. I'm an A-B student in all of my classes and I got a D here. Impossible! Spent days and days studying. Didn't do any good. Wait for a different professor to take this class, because it's a good class, just a****ty teacher.

1.0
5.0
CLASSMYTH
Mar 2, 2006

TERRIBLE! Gamel is a terrible terrible professor. She talks too fast, goes on too many tangents, and pretty much you want to get the most of your college education, do not take any classes with her. Her study guides are just a list of pages and pages of terms,that you would have to look deep into the readings to find, and arent relevant. TERRIBLE!

4.0
4.0
FILMVIOLENCE
Mar 3, 2006

Mary Kay is one of the best professors at UCSC. Her classes are not easy, but she knows her****. Anyone who hates her is probably just an idiot. I took Approaches to Myth and American film violence and I learned more from those classes than from any others I've taken. If you want an easy A don't take a class with her, if you like Lit, go for it.

1.0
5.0
COMSEXLIT123
Jun 17, 2006

Horrible class. Ruined film, comedy and sex. TA's were horrible, lectures were all over the place. Sucked.

5.0
5.0
LTPR123
Jun 24, 2006

Amazing class and fantastic professor! The hardest class I've ever taken but absolutely fair. I'd recommend not taking any other reading-intensive classes with it. Professor Gamel is incredibly responsive and helpful. Only take her class if you're willing to put in the time, though. And DEFINITELY meet with your TA at least once.

4.0
1.0
LTPR123ETC
Aug 11, 2006

I love Mary Kay. She is a fun lecturer, but is absolutely behind the times. She shamelessly plugs her own work, which I find funny. She is really interested in the stuff she teaches which made me more interested in it. Her lectures are hard to follow and the tests are ridiculous, but no papers is nice for a change.

2.0
4.0
LTPR123
Nov 28, 2006

Was an all right class. The title "Comedy and Sex in Theater" is pretty misleading. The only grade in the class is the final, so don't forget to study.

5.0
4.0
LTIN104
Nov 14, 2008

A challenging but do-able Latin course. Mary-Kay is one of the most intelligent professors I've had, a fair grader, fun, and really accessible via email. Plus, she threw us a party after the final. She loves theater and incorporates films and other fun things into the course.

5.0
2.0
LIT61D
Nov 15, 2009

She is interesting/sometimes entertaining/always speaks quickly but as if is excited about own lectures. Always explains how the films watched are connected to plays read. Offers extra credit opportunity. Midterm/final are not too difficult if one reviews names/characters/plots/symbols of films/plays and main terms (don't need all) from readings.

4.0
4.0
LIT61D
Dec 18, 2009

I LOVE Mary Kay! She's extremely engaged and excited about her own lectures, which gets me excited as well. Most of her film choices for this class were interesting, the comic ones were the borefests to be honest. Midterm and Final weren't hard at all, as long as you studied. Papers were graded too hard by the TA's for a Lower Div course.

5.0
1.0
LATIN101
Aug 9, 2011

Mary-Kay is an excellent professor and will do everything to help her students succeed. She hosts study groups every day, and is always willing to help you individually in office hours or via email.

1.0
5.0
LIT61M
Nov 6, 2011

Gamel is... well, the worst professor I've had in college yet. She is completely unprofessional, technologically incompetent, unwilling to acknowledge her own faults, and lectures the class much like a scolding mother. Her tests are nonsensical and she boasts her opinions as though they were facts. I don't understand all the positive comments here.

4.0
3.0
LIT61M
Nov 9, 2011

Good teacher overall, however she can sometimes stray from the topic or let her personal views interfere with content.

2.0
4.0
LIT61M
Dec 13, 2011

The tests were difficult to study for and there is a lot of unneeded reading. A lot of the test questions involved the student understanding the professor's opinion.

5.0
4.0
LIT61
Jan 12, 2012

Gamel is an amazing professor, always excited about what she teaches, is prompt in replying to emails, offers extra credit, lectures are organized/informative, studyuides are detailed/clear, if you are careful to read all the primary texts (there are many)/attend all lectures, you'll do well, tests are hard but very fair/do-able if you study.

5.0
4.0
LTIN102
Mar 2, 2012

An exceptional teacher who goes out of her way to make sure students understand what she's teaching and make herself available whenever someone needs her. However, even with all the help the classes are fairly difficult and will require a lot of effort for a good grade.

1.0
5.0
LIT61M
Jun 6, 2013

Way too challenging, most of the class is failing, and she doesn't curve. Way too disorganized. However she is interesting and a good professor.

5.0
1.0
CLASSICS
Grade: A+
Oct 7, 2014

Mary-Kay is my hero. I love her like as a professor, a mentor and a friend.

5.0
3.0
LATIN102
Grade: A+
Mar 4, 2016

Mary-Kay is the best! I love her - her classes are awesome and super interesting; she's hilarious, understanding and works with you to help you do the best you can - you just need to be honest and up front with her.

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

71% confidence
Based on 7 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (3)
A (2)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 7 reported grades
A+: 3
A: 2
B: 1
B+: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.25 avg change
Dec
Jan
Mar
Jun
Oct
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HIS80

5.0

(1)

LIT061M

5.0

(1)

HIST60

5.0

(1)

MEDEA

5.0

(1)

61M

5.0

(2)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HIS21

5.0

ANCIENTMYTH

5.0

CLASSICMYTH

5.0

CLASSMYTH

5.0

COMSEXLIT123

5.0

Similar Professors