3.2
Quality3.6
Difficulty47%
Would Retake84
Reviews47%
Would Retake
84
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
20
4
20
3
15
2
19
1
10
What Students Say
“He offers a great deal of extra credit but you it ends up adding huge amounts of work”
ARCH26 - 3.0 rating“Easily the BEST professor ive ever had”
ARCH168 - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
27%
Textbook Required
13%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.37 avg changeRatings by Course
LAT21
5.0
(1)LAT3
4.0
(1)ARCH168
4.0
(1)HIST0076
4.0
(1)CLS79
4.0
(2)Difficulty by Course
LAT3
5.0
CLS175
5.0
CLS75
4.3
ARCH187
4.0
HIST0076
4.0
Reviews (84)
Slightly unorganized but definitely knows a ton about the subject and is clearly brilliant. Has a really sarcastic humor which makes the class fun once he gets started. Easy grader, you will think you failed the test but actually do fine.
Excellent use of materials, both ancient and modern scholarship; great discussion leader, who challenges students to think
Harrington is quite a character. He is brilliant, arrogant, and a talented instructor. I hate language, but Harrington structured the course in such a manner that you can still strive even if you aren't great at foreign language. You will have to work hard (maybe less so if you?re good at Latin), but he gives you the resources to do well and learn.
Easily the BEST professor ive ever had. He has a way of making you think differently about archaeology and analyzes the material culture in a way that makes perfect sense but i had never thought of before. He is brilliant and he knows it but he can be really funny and if you participate he will like you.
I found his class really easy and did not require a lot of work, mainly two manageable essays, a field trip to the MFA, a midterm and final. Although that may seem daunting, the work itself was graded really easily. The material is interesting sometimes, but for the most part was rather dull. But It was an easy way to get an arts credit.
ARCH 26 is a class you absolutely need to attend, you don't need to do any of the readings to pass but you need to listen to lectures. Papers are slightly difficult but tests are average if you study a lot (a lot of memorization). He is nice enough, makes a lot of jokes that aren't super funny to non-arch people but he tries. Good World Civ Req.
J Matthew Harrington PhD, degree in sass Sets up lectures so that just by listening you are studying for the exam. That being said, you HAVE to show up if you wanna do well. Readings on the other hand are never on tests class really helps you improve your writing/ critical thinking, and is overall easy/interesting really good pre-major advisor
Only take this course if you have an interest in archaeology. Otherwise, it's mind-numbingly boring, which makes it difficult to do well. The tests cover a ton of material, and the fact that there are 6 (4 essays, 2 tests) different assessments means that there's always an assignment to do. Going to recitation is helpful.
Took this class Pass/Fail. Prof Harrington's lectures are painful. The papers assigned are unclear and graded arbitrarily. He assigns a trip to the MFA as part of a project. I spent 2 hours on the T, was 15 mins late, and he docked me 20 points because I missed his "guided tour." Unfair, and boring professor. Do not enroll in this class.
Arch 26 & 27 are the BEST!! MANY extra credit opportunities including weekly recitation & (non documentary) movies! The papers are only 1000 words & are graded very reasonably, never received below an 89. Archeology should be something you are interested in but the lectures are fun, engaging, & full of witticisms. Plus study guides for all tests!!
Harrington is a great professor and made archaeology fun. Grading is based on 4 essays (1000-1100 words) and 2 tests. Go to lecture to do well on tests, and recitations help you learn the material (it's all about polychrome and an interconnected world systems). He's essentially a modern day Indiana Jones who makes pop culture references
Love this class! It honestly made me want to major in Arch. The professor is extremely knowledgeable about the subject matter & clearly loves what he teaches. He always has a story to tell or a humerous way of describing the objects which really makes the class engaging. The workload is very manageable & the papers are not as daunting as they seem!
Prof. Harrington is one of the best professors I've had. He's funny and his lectures made me love arch so much that I'm majoring in it now. Papers might seem daunting, but are short and have practical application in this field and beyond. Also an advisor who knows the system well and genuinely cares about his students. I am taking his class again!
Had him for Intro to Archaeology, and he really made it come to life. He's a strong character (I can EASILY imagine him playing a middle-aged, modern-day Indiana Jones) with a clear passion for the subject material and a massive memory. You don't have to do the readings if you show up for class, but you MUST be at every lecture. And take notes.
This class has a deceiving amount of work. Do all of the extra credit (lectures and essays) to get an A. I wasn't very interested in the class, but had to take for a culture/art requirement, which made it hard to get through. Professor Harrington is very knowledgeable and I loved his sense of humor. Take advantage of the TAs! They are a God-send.
This class is all about extra credit, there is so much of it available through papers that you have weeks to do and EC recitations every week with TAs who are really helpful. Class itself is quite intense, a powerpoint which you don't need to be there for but if you are, it's clear how passionate Harrington is. Extra credit gets you an A.
hard class
Professor Harrington is incredibly knowledgable about the subject, and clearly knows what he's talking about. Lectures are fast paced and only about 1/4 of the info is useful. Tests are ridiculously unreasonable, and essay prompts are vague and frustrating. He offers a great deal of extra credit but you it ends up adding huge amounts of work.
Professor Harrington gives excellent lectures. The two exams are challenging, but as long as you attend class you'll be fine. He also offers tons of extra credit - attending recitations and doing a couple of extra papers can easily raise your grade by an entire letter. I'd recommend it only to people interested in the subject.
Harrington is the epitome of what I expected in a college professor. Deeply knowledgable/interested in material, nice but not personal. I took Ancient Egypt. Grades are a combo of challenging tests/essays, but manageable if you attend class/study. Big thing to know: EXTRA CREDIT, changed my grade a whole letter but made course a fair deal of work.
I really enjoyed this class. I've always had an interest in archaeology and this was class gives a really good overview. Professor Harrington knows so much about the subject and is low key hilarious. There are 4 essays, a midterm and a final. There are readings assigned in the textbook, but if you go to lectures they aren't necessary.
He clearly knows a lot about history and his lectures reflect this. He is engaging and ready to answer any question about history. Very lecture-heavy, if you don't go you won't pass. A few papers and two tests, but he gives an EXTREMELY generous amount of extra credit-- if you work for it you can change your grade by a whole letter.
Do all the extra credits, go to ALL classes though not mandatory, and go to the TA for essays and you'll be in shape for an A.
I started off last year with Harrington in Classical Archaeology and honestly didn't mind him. His best quality is that he's an interesting lecturer but that's about it. Had him in Ancient Egypt this year and my opinion completely changed. One of the most egotistical profs I've ever met, and the tests with 110 slides to study are just absurd.
There is definitely a lot of interesting things I learnt about the Ancient World here but I did not enjoy the lectures (especially when he read paragraphs of ancient texts) and did not really understand the aim of the class until a few weeks in. They are a lot of arguably uninteresting papers to write about. Learnt more for the exam in recitations
There are two exams and four papers and that is your grade, so if you can write good essays you will do well in the class. As a stem guy who can't write a B took only a little effort on the papers.
By far the worst class Ive ever taken. Professor is extremely boring, and the class is labeled as a history class. This is not a history class, you spend 95% of your time learning about art and architecture. The exams are ridiculous to another level, where the professor expects you to memorize 100 + objects and know everything about them.
It is evident that the professor is knowledgeable and passionate about what he is teaching. He teaches a hard class because it is very reading and writing intensive, and the lectures can be long with a lot of information to keep track of, but it is all interesting.
Best lecturer ever. I love him. Makes very long and sometimes dull lectures super interesting and funny. Made me want to major in Arch or Classics. Focus on broader themes and international systems in the ancient world is incredible.
While the lectures are interesting, the content load was way too much. The exams required a ridiculous amount of studying especially for an introductory class. Do not take the course unless genuinely interested in Egyptian Art history.
If I didn't really like Egyptian art and history I would really not like his class. It gets down into the very, very fine details and he expects you to remember everything on the tests. Gives plenty of extra credit though
I took Harrington's course in my first semester freshman year. Now, as a graduating senior and an archaeology major, I can say that Harrington was my favorite professor. He was so passionate about archaeology and the greater overall themes of history. His class is what convinced me to become an archaeology major.
He teaches way too many classes or just doesn't really care about engaging the students properly. The lectures are too analytical when viewing artistic developments - the feel of the extreme antiquity of the artifacts is never communicated. Maybe he's a nicer guy than he seems though. If you're really into the subject the course is redeemable.
if you dont well on the exams, you probably will have to make it up by doing all the extra credit papers which can be annoying. Professor Harrington is a very caring person
You're probably reading this because you're wondering whether to take Harrington. TLDR: Don't take this class if you don't care about putting in work or can't write (hence the neg reviews). But Prof Harrington is AMAZING. His lectures are great and he gives SO MUCH EXTRA CREDIT. He's made me a better thinker and scholar. I can't recommend him more.
All my other classes assigned homework that made me feel like I was achieving something or being productive, but his was purposeless. I came in expecting to really like the class, and my expectations were dashed; the lectures werent engaging, there was entirely too much busy work, and it felt like running in a hamster wheel.
Hard Exams. That's it
Although he did give extra credit opportunities, the assignments were hard. Also you probably wont do well on the exams if you dont read the textbook lol
Unsustainable amount of reading due each class. Wouldn't recommend for ppl not passionate about the subject. Lots of work - not a class to be taken lightly. Do the extra credit. Don't underestimate the discussion posts; proofread! Harrington is very passionate; answers all questions. Class isn't interactive, just lectures with powerpoints.
Absolutely horrible! literally getting surgery and I'm more looking forward to that than ever hearing his name again! bias, annoying, bad lecturer. An unreasonable amount of reading. Really tough grader. Expect you to know and memorize way more than is physically possible. RUN if you see his name listed on a class.
Harrington seems like a nice guy and his lectures were entertaining, but this class is an insane amount of work. Papers as well as discussion posts with an absurdly high minimum word count. Lots of extra credit papers but good luck finding time to write them on top of the absurd amount of work you already have in this class.
Professor Harrington offers students the opportunity to raise their grades by over 10% through extra credit. This class is not an easy arts credit, but there is no excuse not to get a good grade with the extra credit he gives. Lectures can be boring. The TAs grade very fairly.
I've had Harrington for both large lecture classes and for this small Latin class. The lecture classes (ARCH27 and CLS75) were both good, but Latin 21 was phenomenal. He really shines in the small group setting and I learned so much about not just Latin but also Roman culture. Extremely smart, entertaining, and not too difficult either.
Harrington really knows his stuff about the ancient world. Lectures are pretty good. Lots of assigned reading which I never did and was fine. Lots of writing (2x 500-word posts each week unless there's an essay or exam). Also lots of opportunities for extra credit. Exams are based on recognizing and analyzing images, with a short essay.
If you're interested in Ancient Egyptian art, you'll appreciate this class. Take detailed notes of the lectures and pay close attention to the study guide and you'll do fine on the exams. As long as you're a decent writer, you'll probably do well on the papers and discussion too. Don't be intimidated by the work load and do the extra credit.
I took ARCH26 and ARCH27, and both were amazing courses (26 definitely structured better + easier to understand). He's SO smart and passionate- for that reason alone, never miss a lecture. The readings are mostly unnecessary, but sometimes needed for a paper or discussion post. DEFINITELY go to the extra credit discussion sections, no question.
RUN- RUN FAST! You have to reply to a classmates forum posts with a 400-500 word response (what??). Exams are brutal; critical response papers are due often; assigned 500 word forum posts and 500 word responses. RUN like cheetah away from his breathtakingly rigorous course. I should mention there is the opportunity to receive extra credit. but RUN!
Lectures are engaging and interesting. The class was offered in a hybrid style which was wonderful for when I was sick or just had a conflicting schedule. The class was a bit reading-heavy but Harrington was very reasonable in expectations and there were few required writing assignments. Materials are accessible for review.
Essentially, you will get an A if you do the work. Go to the extra credit lectures and watch the actual lectures at your leisure. There are so many options. You can go online, in-person, or asynchronous online. Literally you will only not get an A if you do not try. A lot of work, but I learned a ton.
i have never been in such a boring class in my life. i love history and archeology and he managed to make me want to sleep every class. he never even introduced himself or the course, and the way he talks is extremely pretentious. feels like you're getting man-splained to for 75 minutes. i leave his lectures extremely uninspired.
Prof is very knowledgeable. The class can be a lot of work sometimes, you either have discussion posts or essays due every week. There are two tests, based mostly on lecture content. He has a very organized canvas site with detailed modules. He live-streams lectures and makes them available to watch later, he also has prerecorded content.
Don't take him if you're not interested in classics or simply need the credit(s). There's an insane amount of reading that's only connected to the discussion posts & papers, which are almost every week. His exams are online, and there's some extra credit but not enough time to do it. Lectures are boring and unengaging, but he has a lot of knowledge
Really tough class, TAs grade pretty harshly, lots of work to do. 2 exams, 2 crps, 5 discussion posts, and readings every week. But its really hard to get anything less than an A- with all of the extra credit opportunities. Take good notes on the lectures and you'll be fine for the exams.
Please do NOT take a class with him no matter what. He teaches things in class that aren't relevant to his exams, lots of discussion posts, reports many people for cheating if they get actual correct answers on exams or write papers that are "too good". This class is not worth your mental health and his unexpected responses. Also extremely boring.
u guys complain way to much bro, this class is free. so much extra credit (~5%) if ur getting anything less than an A- its on you, not harrington. one discussion post every 2 weeks is not asking for a lot. only 2 essays, 3 are ec. for the exams, do the readings and listen to him and you'll make it out fine. good prof and an easy class for reqs
Professor Harrington includes a LOT of assignments for Ancient Egypt. If you want an A, you *need* to put in the work. There are two exams throughout the course, many other assignments too. Many, many extra credit opportunities which you should get ahead on early. Lectures are heavy. I recommend you go to them because he goes over important ideas.
I would only take this class if you're interested in the topic,otherwise,you're going to hate it.If you are interested, it will probably be an interesting class,but if you're just taking it as a requirement,I would go for a different class.Professor Harrington teaches the material well,but his class is lecture style,so it can be very dull at times.
I thought the lecture was dull and very dense but v cool to see trends and patterns. Go to all extra credit discussion sections, free points. EC Papers don't reward enough points for how long they take. Museum trip was fun, writings should be thorough and clearly define "why". Fun art credit w lots of history.
Great class for learning how objects, buildings, and texts can give you information about ancient civs. Both essays involve analysis of an ancient text or object, and the exams are based on object IDs. He posts study guides early, so you know what lecture content is relevant to the exams. You need to work to get an A, but it's pretty fair.
unpleasant and uninspiring. i cannot stress this enough- one of the most difficult professors i have ever worked with and the type to make things tough on purpose- tougher than they need to be. avoid.
Professor Harrington is a great lecturer. Every lecture is extremely humorous and entertaining. While the course does have lots of required work, as long as you pay attention, study, and put the work in getting a good grade is not challenging. In addition, there's lots of extra credit opportunities. Highly recommend this class!
Insane amount of reading that barely connects to the lectures. The lectures are dull and hard to follow. Biweekly discussion posts with 800-1000 words total (post and response). There are a lot of opportunities for extra credit, though.
Super interesting class that covers a lot of requirements. Very good to pair with ARCH0027 to get a view of the Ancient World Systems. Discussion posts were annoying but manageable if you do the readings. The lectures were engaging if you enjoy classics, but I could see them being a little boring if you are just taking this for requirements.
Professor Harrington is a great professor who is really passionate about the subjects he teaches. There are a LARGE amount of extra credit opportunities, so it is hard to be dissatisfied with your grade if you are taking advantage of them. Highly recommend this class to fulfill a humanities requirement, and it is best if you go to the lectures.
Not sure how Harrington has so many positive reviews. His lectures are so dull and dense. For an intro-level class, the reading load is unreasonable, and there are 500 word discussion posts + 500 word responses due every other week. Harrington and his TAs also grade papers harshly. Even with the extra credit he offers, avoid this class if you can.
Bad lectures, mandatory weekly discussion posts with some legitimately baffling prompts (like nationalism? In a ancient near east class? Why was this a prompt for a discussion?). Grading is harsh and has no clear guidelines. Genuinely boring, horrible, and hard. Do not take this class.
Overall, this class was fairly interesting to me and I would say that the Prof is extremely knowledgeable about this subject. My problem comes from the graded assignments, where the grading criteria isn't clear and they're graded harshly. I wouldn't recommend you take this class unless you're an upperclassman or interested in ancient civilizations.
The other reviews suck. The readings aren't too bad, and you can skip them easily. In his course about Roman and Greek art they're a bit much, but in the other 2 I've taken its fine Anyway, he is the only reason I care at all abt the ancient world. He makes it so interesting and I love his lectures tbh. The work isn't too much at all either.
I agree that the reading load is a bit more manageable than other people have said, but the material covered in readings and lectures is so boring, and he's still a tough grader. Only take this class if you're genuinely interested in classical archeology. Don't take it just for the requirement.
Lectures and readings were boring, final was brutal (in-person and had to be handwritten).
Intro to Classical Mythology. The class did not feel introductory and there was a lot of reading to keep up with especially from Mon to Wed with other classes to keep up with. Discussion posts and comments were chill; the test format was devastating and difficult to recover after unless completing all the extra credit. Not worth humanities credit.
Lectures are ONLY pictures/media, little to review afterwords. Tough grader, inaccessible out of class (didn't show up to office hours). 500-word posts twice every two weeks + essays + long readings. Heavy curriculum, jumps back and forth chronologically. Extra credit does little to recover grade. Do not take...or do and rely heavily on your TA's.
Pros: Course material was interesting, lectures are engaging, extra credit opportunities. Cons: Grading criteria is very unclear, confusing, and extremely harsh - there is no guidance and feedback is different every time. He makes it hard for the sake of being hard, not for pedagogy, and refuses to engage outside of class. Would not recommend.
Overall, I did learn a lot from the professor, as his lectures were very informative and interesting. However, I do think that the criteria for assignments was not clear, so I never knew what he was looking for. Especially for the exams, no feedback was given for the first exam, so I did not know how to improve for the second exam.
You have to put in a lot of time if you want an A. Don't take this class if you're looking for an easy req. However, there's a LOT of extra credit that can boost your grade ~5-7%. The TAs grade harshly on essays, but exam study guides are posted early so use them to study.
ARCH 26 is a very difficult and time-consuming class. Avoid unless you're genuinely interested in classics/archeology.
Papers every other week and lectures are very information-heavy, but he is very clear about how to study for exam, plenty of extra credit opportunities etc. It is SO easy to get an A in this class you just need to get ready to listen to him yap for an hour but I found his lectures to be pretty interesting. Kinda like a standard AP art hist class
Professor Harrington's courses are INTENSE but if you like the subject matter they aren't so bad. He's clearly incredibly knowledgeable and I found lectures long but super engaging and interesting. Discussion posts are a little annoying band exams are super stressful in the moment but not graded unfairly, if you put in the work in you'll be fine.
Not the worst class taken but also not the best. Discussions weren't hard but the grading criteria was also unclear. Do the extra credit and if you skip make sure to watch the lecture videos.
(ARCH28, not listed). Harrington himself is incredibly pretentious, super hard to reach outside of class, mumbles during lectures and makes no effort to get to know his students. The course itself is fine, assignments are repetitive but easy to get right if you know what he's looking for.
Lectures get boring after a while, clearly very knowlegable but he isn't super engaging. He is hard to reach outside of class. There are a lot of extra credit opportunities but they aren't always worth it, you have to spend so much time just to make 5 points back out of a 250 point exam.
Insane amount of readings from textbook and books for homework (can succeed without reading), but besides that there is not much (besides a discussion post every week/2weeks). Tells you in advance the exact format of midterm with example problems and answers. Weekly discussion zooms were key for me to understand content, and they give bonus points.
The class itself is fairly easy, as you just need to do the readings to do well on exams + he offers lots of extra credit opportunities (though the extra credit is only a small buffer against those 250 pt exams). His lectures were full of tangents and a lot of information that wasn't relevant to the course material, and he's not approachable.
The first half of the semester about just Egypt is great, but the second half is so convoluted and confusing when you try to cram all of Mesopotamia into like a month. Should just be two separate classes tbh. Readings are basically optional if you pay attention and have a grasp on the material you can do good on the tests, also TONS of extra credit
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
27%
Textbook Required
13%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.37 avg changeRatings by Course
LAT21
5.0
(1)LAT3
4.0
(1)ARCH168
4.0
(1)HIST0076
4.0
(1)CLS79
4.0
(2)Difficulty by Course
LAT3
5.0
CLS175
5.0
CLS75
4.3
ARCH187
4.0
HIST0076
4.0