2.7
Quality3.5
Difficulty49%
Would Retake175
Reviews49%
Would Retake
175
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
32
4
18
3
45
2
22
1
58
What Students Say
“The post labs are not explained nor are they taught”
CHEM150L - 1.0 rating“McCormick's book is useless in explaining the material”
CHEM221L - 2.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
96%
Textbook Required
5%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-1.00 avg changeRatings by Course
221L
5.0
(1)CHEM204L
4.3
(4)CHEM221222LAB
4.0
(2)CHEM222L
4.0
(5)CHEM2O4L
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
CHEM
5.0
CHEM100
4.5
CHEM202L
3.8
150L
3.6
CHEM150L
3.4
Reviews (175)
such a horrible teacher, i don't even remember how to spell his name. horrible. impossible quizzes, horrible class lectures. take anyone but mccormick...
No Comments
Man this guy blows. Too bad you're stuck with him if you take orgo. Poor man thinks he's somethin else.
i didn't think he was so bad. enthusiastic at least.
Really hard... too much work. Sucks to be stuck with him.
Go to the lab lectures, keep up with the work, and you will do fine. McCormick is VERY strange, but passionate and good at what he does. Once you can get past not liking him personally, you will do well in the class.
fun and sweet guy, a little over the edge but nothing that will bother you. lab is pretty straight forward with him although the assignments and papers are pointless, you don't learn much from them.
I'm confused by the early ratings for McCormick. I guess a lot has changed? The class was very easy. It's obvious that he's passionate about chemistry, and I think he explains things very clearly. Some of the labs and most of the assignments seem pointless, but that's hard to avoid with the kind of schedule that comes with a lab class.
He's a super funny, quirky prof and is really nice and very helpful during office hours. He doesn't grade your papers your TA does, but in general its pretty easy to get an A in orgo lab.
McCormick's book is useless in explaining the material. You have to go online to really understand procedures, which completely undermines the purpose of paying tuition for the damn class. On top of that, he is never in lab and his TAs are useless. Given the choice I would rather take class with a monkey than him.
Mainly interact with TA's, but he puts a lot of effort into the class and it shows
All he does is lecture and explains the experiments a bit, so you mostly work with TAs. He is a pretty good lecturer though, and I think you will like the course. It is curved a lot at the end I think too.
I took McCormicks lab, as a freshman. It was great. He's nice, helpful... and although you work mainly with ta's, hes readily available and helps a lot when you ask it... he wants to help and he cares about his students thanks for a great semester dr mccormick mind you, you should attend labs tho otherwise youll have to make it up
McCormick is subpar. He makes needle-in-a-haystack labs that are a complete waste of time. His explanations are hazy at best. And at the end of the semester, he buries you with a ridiculously unfair and pointless "notebook quiz". Unless you are incredibly anal in recording your observations and results, you won't do well, and it's 30% of your grade
Honestly, eh. He's one of those "the learning is more important than the grades you get" kinda guy, and that makes it hard to talk with him about the grading system if you're not satisfied with it. He has a notebook quiz which is unfairly difficult (he promised to curve but he didn't); overall, It's too much work for a lab class.
Outstanding, outstanding lecturer. The best lecturer I've taken at Emory. He only teaches some concepts/lab skills every other week, but when he does he teaches with such clarity and enthusiasm that it makes the 2-3 hours of somewhat difficult coursework very bearable.
Professor McCormick is super enthusiastic about the material. The lab is well organized. Attendance is mandatory. You spend most of the time with your TAs instead of Professor McCormick, but have occasional pre-lab lectures with him.
His labs are disorganized, students are generally unhappy with his performance. His post labs and the labs themselves are usually unrelated. The post labs are not explained nor are they taught. This is not a class. In addition, he is extremely unapproachable, unreasonable, and cold. Avoid at all costs.
McCormick can be a cold teacher at times, but his lab is organized as long as you read the procedures before class. The post lab assignments are not all that difficult but I would suggest working with another person in the class because it does get challenging.
Prof. McCormick's tendency to penalize people for nitty gritty details makes this class less than enjoyable. Labs are often disorganized and his pre-lab lectures often have little to do with the labs themselves. The post-lab assignments are usually vague and the TAs grade them harshly. Avoid taking his class unless you necessarily have to.
It really depends on your TA's. Post labs are sometimes really hard and sometimes irrelevant. McCormick isn't really there and he doesn't grade your post labs.
He's very condescending... If you had a choice, I'd advise you not to take him, but he supervises all of the Chem150L classes, so you're kind of stuck with him. If you don't want him to make snarky comments at you during lab, all you have to do is be perfect!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :/
He can be really rude most of the time and really condescending. Quality checks are important so try to get full marks if possible. especially and definitely don't overlook the one in the final (that one dropped my 99% grade to an A- fml). Otherwise it's an easy class and grades are mostly dependent on which TA you get
lab doesnt relate to lecture at all and some things we did seem useless. post labs could be challenging and are graded by TAs. lab pretty organized and clear if u red ahead of time.
Post labs are difficult, very nice guy and I enjoy his lectures.
Took 150 lab during the summer and it was actually completely taught and graded by McCormick himself. He was an amazing professor overall and explained everything very clearly. I definitely learned a great deal from him. Only had around 15 kids in my class so that might've been why it was better than Fall semester lab.
Not many kids in lab want to be there, but McCormick always comes to class full of enthusiasm and good vibes! If you take his class please laugh at his jokes so he knows he is doing a good job. He's a great lecturer, explains things very clearly and precisely, and genuinely wants everyone to succeed. I really enjoyed his class & highly recommend!!!
He is inaccessible, arrogant, and grades unfairly
Great lecturer!!! Really need to be careful with the accuracy of the experiments and the notebook because these are like the most important parts of your grade. Final is pretty easy.
broke my hand before the final. He said i didn't need the paperwork for extra time. He never showed up during the exam to tell the proctor and I didn't finish the exam. I missed an A by 0.3% overall. When i asked him if there was anything i could do to pull it up (because of the broken hand), he made it very clear that it was my problem not his. :(
Mccormick is fairly decent. He explains the lab concepts clearly. Some people have called him arrogant, but I never had that problem. He does his job, and when I emailed him about a lab makeup, he gave me one. However, he isn't very accessible; he's not really around during the actual lab. The TA's grade the majority of the assignments.
He has a charming disposition, I noticed other ppl called him snarky/rude, but I don't think he is. Respect his time and authority as ur professor and u won't have any problems w/ him. He's always cracking jokes and he is very approachable and explains things in a very easy to understand way. Chem150L doesn't build off of curriculum from Chem150.
difficulty of the class really depends on how tough of a grader the TA is as this metric can vary greatly from TA to TA which honestly sucks. doesn't show you how he calculates your overall grade at the end. says he gives a 5% bonus but not really sure how that was factored in. lab is organized much better than previous labs
The post labs do not correspond to CHEM 150, so you end up having to reteach yourself topics from high school chemistry: doing assignments (there are MANY due each week) can take hours. If you can't teach yourself everything about lewis bases and oxidation numbers in one night and then answer vague questions about that with no guidance, tough.
McCormick isn't around much during the actual labs. His assignments can be difficult and require students to teach themselves some topics. TAs do the grading and they can be harsh. However, he is enthusiastic during lectures and his office hours are helpful. I wouldn't take this class unless I had to though, it's fairly time consuming.
this class grade depends on your instructor and TA whether or not they grade your notebook and work harshly. I don't like the grading policy in this class. Literally have to score above 93 for every assignment. I spend the most time in this class but still do not get a good grade. If you fail one thing, your grade would drop a lot.
Overall, I think Professor McCormick is good lecturer. He tells you up front that the lab does not follow the CHEM 150 class, so you may have to relearn some things for the post lab questions. The post lab assignments can be time consuming, but those are graded by your TA, so its somewhat up in the air depending on how harsh of a grader they are.
Really great teacher and definitely gives really good, helpful feedback IF you ask for it. Office hours are the best.
Way better than he was in CHEM150L 2 years back. No practical but quite a bit of assignments. Best to see him or GSIs during office hours as is the case with most other chemL.
After having Mulford (who is the worst), McCormick was a nice break. McCormick is much better in 204L and the class is slightly easier as there is no final practical. For the assignments I would recommend going to McCormick's office hours and not the TA's as most of the time they actually didn't know the answers to the post/pre-labs.
They changed Chem 204L, and the new program is better. The grading rubric is very clear, and there's no final anymore. McCormick does his best to make sure you learn, and the graduate instructors were all great!
I had him for lab during zoom semester. Super unorganized and little regard for students.
Had Professor McCormick during fall zoom semester. He held little regard for students, was super unorganized, and came off as extremely rude in emails sent to students (with many grammar mistakes as well). The class basically depends on how good your TA is - he barely intervenes.
McCormick does not care about you. He doesn't care if you learn chemistry. He doesn't care that literally every single person in college right now is so burnt out that they would rather eat sand than do their assignments. He just keeps piling on stupid and unnecessary and worthless extra non-lab assignments that do nothing except stress people out.
Very unorganized. He had a summer and a fall semester to improve and he changed nothing. The most disappointing course I have taken thus far.
It is misplaced to call Michael McCormick a Professor. He does little more than assign copious amounts of work outside of the labs with little to no teaching. He repeatedly plagiarizes his assignments off the web and puts no effort into teaching students CHEM. The TAs are nice, but the class is horribly structured with too much unnecessary work.
The non-HOL assignments are not well-written and super-confusing. Even my TA doesn't know what to do or how to help on these assignments. Chem lab is the hardest class I've ever taken, because the assignments just don't make sense
Major assignments are idiotic and you do not have any idea what they want from their questions most of the time. He will have assignments revised numerous times including the day its due because of the errors and typos, so it just turned into every chem student working together to get the assignments done in groupme. You have labs to do but no clas
McCormick doesn't actually teach or overlook the class; the TA is the one who grades everything. However, the non-lab assignments we had were super annoying and just confusing and complicated for no reason. Everyone had some trouble with them, especially the last one, which was just unnecessarily hard to understand.
As with CHEM 150L this class was generally disorganized and students were left unsure of their requirements for grading. The lab assignments are poorly written and have lots of errors. I appreciated his work with trying to integrate our lecture content with the lab. However, lab was tedious and required more busy work than a standard Emory class.
I wouldn't recommend Dr. McCormick. There was very little communication with the TAs and therefore they were often unable to answer questions. There's useless/irrelevant and time consuming busy work (e.g. essays). The dysfunction may have been because of the online format, but I didn't learn anything new and was constantly irritated by this class.
Honestly don't understand why so many people hated him. I had like 2-3 hours of lab work a week that were easy to do well in, and I've heard it's usually its like 3x that amount. I met him in-person too and he was a cool guy. Sure, the assignments outside of labs were difficult, but not everything is supposed to be really easy?
Gives an overload of busy work that isn't conceptually covered in lecture or lab. Both TAs and students are often baffled by what to do with his assignments. He's pompous, arrogant, and condescending. Like he can't believe that freshmen chemistry students aren't at his level. He's tough to avoid, so do assignments early and hope for a good TA.
He's nice but we only see him for prelab lectures, which are kinda useless. The post-labs take forever but are only completion grades. The confidence checks are easy A's. Our final was open-note which was nice. Overall, the experiments are straightforward and easy.
McCormick teaches all Chem 150L labs, or at least he does this year. Don't worry- your TA is who matters and they are generally helpful. McCormick is very passionate about chemistry, but he gets carried away during lectures. You should find a solid group of people to complete post-lab assignments with so that you have a support system.
Professor McCormick genuinely has no regard for his students. He is condescending and will harangue students if theyre not up to his standards. Students are given tedious post lab assignments, that take hours, but theyre only worth 5% of your grade. The final is worth everything in this class and its difficult and unlike class material.
Do NOT take him if you don't have to (many pre-health students do though, unfortunately). He's a cold person and will show no sympathy for you or your grade. Labs are extremely stressful despite being most students' first semester of college, and your grade in the class is highly variable even if you are a great student. Do the pre-notebook checks!
Final was 40% of overall grade. Homework was 5% of overall grade. However, the homework took about 3 times more time and effort than the final. None of the grading percentages made any sense really. Not too hard if you put the effort in, though. Don't be careless and don't be stupid and you should be fine. TA really makes the classI loved my TA :)
honestly, the lab wasn't too bad throughout the year with pre-lab and post-lab assignments and a couple of notebook checks and lab practicals too. HOWEVER, the final is 40% of your grade and is a multiple-choice test. it was really stressful and was annoying to take a paper and pencil test for a lab. i would just emphasize using your cheat sheet!
Pre-lab lectures are incredibly boring and elementary (almost patronizingly so). Many assignments are poorly worded and tedious. Grading scheme is ridiculous; the only test is worth 40% and all assignments are worth 5%. You probably don't have a choice whether or not to have him for lab, but just be prepared. But, it won't be the end of the world!
Everyone gives him a hard time, but he is not bad at all. I loved his passion for chemistry. The TAs matter more because he only does lecture. Just be prepared for the Final Exam because it is 40% of your grade if you have ever had lab experience you should be set for an A.
He has assignments that take sooo much time worth so little, it is physically painful. The final had absolutely no relevance to the lectures and was difficult in the wrong way. He was unsympathetic to any struggles students may have.
horrible. very few people get A's. good luck!
The way Professor Mccormick set up this class is so messed up. He says his main goal is to get you confident in your lab skills but the makes the final, which is not at all on lab skills nor most of what's learned during the lecture portion, worth 40% of the final grade. Really pay attention to post labs and understand the material
Greedy professor that makes money by selling the compiled "notebook" for a profit. This is OChem. In addition, if you have friends, buy used ones, since you won't use all the carbon copies anyway. Need to be an expert in OChem to excel in the course. And not much help from anyone. It is a fierce school. You are discouraged to collaborate.
Probably the worst professor I've had at Emory.
He's awful, unorganized, and doesn't communicate. The prelab lectures are long, pointless, and have nothing to do with the material. The postlabs take hours and are for very few points. The final is a majority of your grade and barely has to do with the actual experiments, mostly what you will have to read from his (poorly written) book.
horrible
He speaks with a passive-aggressive tone and I feel like he constantly judges his students. His grading criteria are very difficult to understand. Pay attention to the lecture as many of the topics covered will show up on the final lab exam. This exam is 40% of your grade so be prepared.
Professor McCormick is the worst professor I have encountered. Postlab assignments take multiple hours, but are worth almost nothing grade-wise. Instead, 40% of the final grade is determined by one 36-question exam. When students raised this concern, he simply told us to "be grateful for the learning opportunity." He's impossible to avoid :(
Just a straight up rude professor. I asked him a question once and in a snide tone he told me to "think more deeply about it" like hey thanks McCormick. Maybe you should think more deeply about getting a PhD Mr. McCormick because with only a masters degree most of your graduate TAs know more than you.
worst prof ever
incredibly difficult to receive an A in the class due to horrendous grading criteria. 30% of your grade comes from a disorganized "notebook check". Even if you have pertinent info from labs written down he will ask random stuff. 40% of grade is a final with no direction - AKA random Qs. Hours long post labs worth essentially nothing.
As many other students mentioned, your grade pretty much just comes from a notebook check with unclear criteria and a final exam. The exam does not test on laboratory methods but simply on seemingly arbitrary topics covered briefly during pre-lab lectures. He is very very difficult to avoid for pre-med.
Nearly impossible to receive an A in this course because the final exam is difficult, notebook evaluation is tested for the most minuscule details, and the cutoff is a 94 (which he let us know the day grades were released!). He's the only professor for the lab; put a LOT of effort into learning the content and keeping an extraordinary notebook.
Horrible professor with a terribly disorganized class. Unfortunately, you have no choice but to take him since he's the only professor for 150 and 202 L. Just know that you will be putting HOURS of work into assignments worth essentially nothing. Most of your grade comes from a final exam that is in no way relevant to the course learning objectives
Look what he say: What this means is that you may be 1/10th of a point away from the next higher grade and probably multiple DOZENS of you are that close to a grade line. Please understand that it is not appropriate to ask me to move you into the next higher category. And 94 is A.
I dislike the way in which the course is organized. How you did on nearly every assignment does not matter. Your grade will be determined, almost entirely, by your performance on the notebook check and the final. The post labs, which will be what you spend the vast majority of your time on this this class, does not count for enough of your grade.
Dr.McCormick was a pretty good professor and Chem202L was an okay class. McCormick gave clear lectures and clearly outlined what would be on the final test. However, our grade was pretty much determined by a final test and a notebook check which made it really easy to get a bad grade if we slipped up.
grade based on coming to lab, notebook check, and final test.... not a lot of leeway... before the final GO to his office hours and you'll have a pretty good idea whats going to be on the test &DONT go to saac semi +go to bed at 4am the night before. hold a neat and detailed notebook all semester (include things u might think are meaningless)
He makes the post-labs for Chem202 Lab extremely long and annoying. Furthermore, the final and notebook evaluation were both worth 40% of our grade even though the post-labs take a lot of effort to complete. His lab is way too much work for a 2 credit class. Also he changed the grading scale to only a 94 and above is an A.
HORRIBLE professor --- didn't tell us grade cutoffs until the day grades were released and changed up the grade breakdown from the syllabus 1 week before school ended. Extremely rude and unforgiving with grades. He's the type of person who won't round you to a 90 even if you have a 89.9999999.
Very difficult class with one notebook evaluation and one final exam factoring in for a total of 70% of your grade. Make sure to keep up very well with your notebook. Is very adamant about not giving any extra credit or rounding up grades no matter how close they are to the next level.
McCormick makes the class too subjective for it to be fair. Depending on the TA you have, you could be spending 30 min to hours on post labs each week. The grading for notebook evals were also very different across each section; some gave partial credit while others didn't EVEN THOUGH THE EXAM STATED WE WOULD LITERALLY BE GIVEN PARTIAL CREDIT
Unfortunately, McCormick is the only professor who directs the chemistry labs (I believe at all levels). Requires a lab notebook that has obvious typos in them, and gives the most boring pre-lectures. Not much else I can say, as he is very rarely in the lab itself. Pray you get a good TA and you'll be fine.
Final literally so hard and has nothing to do with anything you learned in class. You probably dont have a choice to not take him but he's truly awful so brace yourself. Post-labs are difficult and the final exam is a total grade killer. I feel bad for anyone who has to take Chem 150L.
Dr. McCormick's exam is very fair, and you learn a lot of useful lab techniques. His prelab lectures are engaging and he has fair and clear expectations. If you make an effort to truly understand, you will do well. He made a genuine effort to help when my friends and I had a question. He also has amazing fashion taste.
Professor McCormick is witty and gives challenging but fair assignments. The class is reasonably graded and the experiments address a variety of useful topics. Students who did not actually learn the material or do the pre-labs did poorly on the final, but if you put in effort, then you should be able to earn a high grade.
McCormick made Chem 150L one of my most valuable classes this semester. The class is well organized and the curriculum makes sense. The final exam was fair and applied what we learned throughout the semester. It was tricky and fun. He is a funny person.
Dr. McCormick is such a nice and caring person. And it is easy to see that he is very enthusiastic about his class. This lab was very organized and the grading was very clear. The final wasn't extremely hard and reflected the course material well. The only problem with this course was the required low-quality lab notebook--made pre-labs harder.
The course was well organized despite many typos in his lab manual. Post-labs were easy as long as you attended TA's office hours. Quite a bit of effort needed to prepare pre-lab notebook if you want to know what's going on in lab the next day. Biggest thing that bothered me was the final that was extremely difficult. Generous curve though.
Labs are fairly easy, pre-labs can be tedious and annoying, and same can be said for post-labs. The TAs are amazing and kind, I would go to them if I had any questions. McCormick can come off as unnecessarily dramatic and he is also a tough grader. The final test and notebook exam were graded toughly, but there was a generous curve on them.
Honestly, I don't know how involved he was in grading given that I barely saw him. So, be sure to get a good TA and undergrad LA if possible. Tips: really understand your labs, write down EVERY single thing for pre-labs, and really prepare for the mc exam. The MCQ exam can easily tank your grade even if you maintained a 99% for the whole sem.
I thought Professor McCormick really cared about what we learned in class and in the lab. The labs are really led and graded by the TAs; I think they are the ones who would really influence your experience in the lab. The grading isn't too harsh; you should be good if you really know and understand what you're doing in the lab.
Honestly, It appears many times that Dr. McCormick expects us tobe familiar with concepts that were barely covered in lecture, and treats the post lab assignments of this lab class itself as if we are taking a chemistry lecture. Avoid McCormick if you can because a majority of his work is simply busy work that does not help your learning.
Not much too say, this man is amazing. He's life-changing, take him if you want a true Emory experience
Professor McCormick is very fair and caring about his students. He is always willing to help when you ask him a question and is very accessible. He cares about the material he teaches and the labs are very engaging and interesting. All assignments, quizzes, and exams are fair and cover exactly what was emphasized. He is amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Professor McCormick is my favorite professor ever at Emory so far. He is caring, funny, and fair. Your grade depends a lot on the work that you put into the course. If you put in the work and make an effort to understand, the course is very fair.
I love Professor McCormick. He is a great lecturer and makes fun online videos to help with conceptual understanding of post-labs. The Chem department is full of great professors, and Professor McCormick is no exception. Go to his office hours and get to know him!
This man's videos and online lectures are hilarious. He clearly knows what he's doing and he's very knowledgeable. Very fair exams too!
The class was not nearly as bad as many people make it out to be. Professor McCormick is very willing to answer questions and help. The labs are fun and I learned a lot!
Chemistry is very difficult for me, but I learned so much from this lab class. Even if you do not end up with an A due to the difficult final test, you have to recognize how well-organized the class is and how much you can get out of it.
So many useless assignments that no one actually understands.
You're not always expected to know everything on the post-labs on the first try. My advice is to start them early, and then go to someone's office hours if you need help. McCormick and the GSIs are all happy to help. Make sure to write everything in your notebook, write down all key concepts on your cheat sheet, and you should be good to go.
The class has so many sections, so you can't really contact Dr. McCormick outside of class unless it's in office hours, but he's rlly nice and cares! The post lab assignments were unrelated to lab and super complicated concepts we haven't even touched in lecture or lab yet. The lab final was better than the one for Chem 150L.
If you love chemistry take Dr. McCormick! He is so passionate about teaching, he even gives random mini lectures on unrelated chem topics. If you just need a 202L credit and don't care about chemistry, then maybe choose someone else. Otherwise, Dr. McCormick is a joy to learn from and everyone in my class agreed he was a really cool professor.
Dr. McCormick is great. He allows you to do corrections on post labs, clear with the grading criteria, and cares about his students' wellbeing. Make sure to write down all details in your notebook (even trivial things) and you'll be fine with the notebook check. Take notes on the pre-lab lectures and review your notebook and you'll do great. 10/10.
Lot of errors in the lab manual...grades harshly. did not enjoy him from last year
He grades the lab notebook difficult, but is otherwise a pretty chill guy. Gives off serious kooky scientist vibes.
Content is not related to Chem 150L and more importantly teaches us basic chem lab skills. The final is worth a good chunk of your grade and is entirely multiple choice, it is curved and is not as hard as others make it to seem. The postlab assignments are resubmittable. :D
Professor McCormick was an overall fun lecturer; however, I do not think he prepared us well at all for the final exam. Yes, the post-lab questions were similar regarding the content we had to know, but there was not nearly enough practice provided to help us truly understand how to approach and solve many of the mathematical questions.
Dr. McCormick's post labs are sometimes not related to the lab work we do, and the grading is somewhat harsh. His guiding on what to study for the final lab exam was not clear at all, leaving many students to just study random things that were not related to the final exam. With that being said, he is typically available outside of class times.
You never see much of McCormick, as your grad TA is the one in the lab with you and grading all your assignments. Very lenient class - graded on post labs (resubmit table for full cred), attendance, notebook, and there's even extra cred. final is meh, but curved (avg final grade was a B this semester).
You will only see Dr. McCormick during the first few classes for about 30 minutes, other than that you see your TA and LA every week. I had a great TA and LA who were chill about grading and assignments. The post labs are pretty simple and they give away the answers during TA office hours. The labs typically don't take the entire time.
My only interaction with Dr. McCormick was during office hours, however he was so willing to explain simple concepts that I couldn't comprehend. Your experience heavily depends on your lab TA's.
CHEM 150L is dependent on your lab TA. We had weekly post-lab assignments and had to write out a procedure for each lab. You are able to resubmit post-labs if there are any errors on your first attempt. I wish there was more guidance on what to study for the final but making the cheat sheet did help. Dr. McCormick is accessible with office hours.
Chem150 Lab is mostly based on how helpful and knowledgeable your TA's are. The only reason I don't necessarily recommend professor McCormick is because the final is basically impossible to study for since there is no insight on types of questions or what material is covered. Since it's a lab course there aren't notes or slides to study.
His lectures were very boring and the tests matter a lot. Ur expected to learn concepts from the labs and post-labs but they were never explained. I recommend going to office hours more and taking notes on the application problems that show up on the post-labs. U get cram sheet for final so maybe prepare that throughout the semester.
Chem 150L was fun and I enjoyed the course because it was fairly independent. However, the quizzes, final exam, and scavenger hunts are tough because you can't study for them. They also don't tell you the grade cutoffs until the very end. But as long as you resubmit your post-labs and come to class every time, you will be fine.
At least the final was curved :P, its about the same difficulty as the Chem 150 lab final. Quizzes sometimes mention things not covered in the textbook. The lab notebook checks were lowkey brutal this semester like brother was asking about the COLOR OF WINE. Post lab assignments are not too bad. Just another mid professor :/
Not more difficult than 150L. Pretty easy to get an A, but just very annoying. You can get the post-lab answers from TA office hours. I think lab with McCormick is just a rite of passage, not much you can do about it.
Like all other labs, your TA will make or break this class. McCormick makes the rubrics very tough, so if your TA is very strict based on his rubric, it's easy to do poorly. I personally did not see him in person in lab a single time throughout the entire semester besides pre-lab lecture, which makes him less accessible outside of class.
Your TA is really what matters but McCormick makes the answer keys that are sometimes very specific and no rubrics are ever attached. The post labs in 202L compared to 150L are much harder, but the final was actually not bad. Thankfully he curves the final bc the avg is usually a C. He's accessible via email but you don't really interact with him.
honestly chem 150 lab is based solely on the grad TA you get. you very rarely see McCormick and at most see him fro 20 minutes for a pre lab lecture. post labs are graded by TAs as well. there is canvas online midterm, and in personal final. keep a good lab notebook , pray you get a good grad TA, and try your best on post labs
he is like fine. he rarely enters the lab besides occasionally walking through to critique your set-up. he is just really corny and talks and writes way more than he needs to. be sure to be really detailed with your lab notebook because the scavenger hunt will get you 😭. how hard the class is really depends on your TA
Dude is hella cheesy and expects you to know a decent amount of chemistry coming into the class. It just seems like the lab never got the same change that the lecture side of chemistry got a couple years ago. Having the right TA makes or breaks this class.
Just finished chem 203L. We took McCormick for granted😭😭😭. Didn't know how good we had it.
He requires every student to buy a notebook written by himself which is expensive. The course is generally informative, but you would be often confused by him.
McCormick is a fine. The lab is fine. Make sure to be specific in your notebooks! Color matters. His final is difficult in terms of the material you learn. It is based heavily on the post lab. All other assignments are fairly easy. It is heavily TA based but thankfully I loved mine.
The course is largely TA-dependent, but with some prep using tools like Unstuck AI, you can succeed. The final is challenging, so focus on the post-labs and cheat sheet.
Your success in this class depends heavily on the quality of your TA, which unfortunately can vary significantly. If McCormick were more involved or provided greater support to ensure consistency among the TAs, this class would be both more effective and fairer for students. Emory should do better.
I do not hate Michael McCormick. He has a clear system, the labs are engaging, you will learn the foundations, and it is not hard to get an A. People say he is condescending in his videos, but that is due to a generational technology disconnect. He is a very chill and encouraging dude in person and cares about his students.
McCormick is a pretty chill, organized, and kind professor. The actual labs aren't taught by him, but rather "taught" by TAs. And yes, your grade does somewhat rely heavily on how tough your TA is. Do well on post-labs, go to office hours, & turn stuff in on time, & you'll be fine.
This class was honestly pretty easy. I'm not even pre-med and as long as you do your stuff on time, you're good. Do post labs as a group and you're set. Fun class with a fun lab.
mccormick does not have that much influence over your grade in this class because most of the grading is done by your TA... however he did do the pre-lab lectures and some of them were okay but many were difficult to understand unless you already had a background in chemistry imo. he can also be passive aggressive at times but not that bad overall
Even though this class is an intro to chem lab, the professor expects you to have chemistry knowledge already. He barely teaches in person, and I only saw him in my lab twice this semester to correct my "mise en place." Your post-lab grade depends on how strict your TA is, so go to office hours for help with the assignments since they will be hard.
I interacted with McCormick a few times via email and once in person, and he was always very friendly! I have no complaints about his teaching style, even though it's pretty hands-off. The experiments he designed were fun and easy to understand!
If you have already taken AP Chem, this lab will be a piece of cake. Labs are straightforward. Give extra attention to the details. Write your lab notebook thoroughly and take your time recording the observations (please). You won't really learn from the professor. The lab is heavily dependent on TAs.
TA makes or breaks your lab, McCormick is barely there. Grading is super strict, but there are chances to redo some work. Scavenger Hunt and final weigh the most, which can be really hard. Lab itself is very straightforward even if you don't have much chem lab experience. TAs are helpful. Lab nb, which is written by MC, is sometimes unclear tho.
I weirdly enjoyed this more than my actual class. McCormick will sometimes make a dazzling appearance once in a blue moon, so roll the dice with the TA. Mine was fine but he just stood there and checked stations before you left. Keeping a good notebook is so important, like seriously. I had fun though and we rarely spent the whole 3 hours in lab.
Most labs are very TA dependent, so you just have to get lucky. Most of the assignments require you to get 100%, but there's many attempts so it's manageable. MC seems to put on a tough face, but if you ever need help or have any circumstance that comes up, he is understanding. Final is hard but curved.
Only the TA matters, he doesn't show up in class and doesn't care about you. Don't take the class, don't take the class, don't take the class, go somewhere else.
One of the worst professors at emory. Chem lab becomes the worst nightmare. Too bad it can't really be avoided since he's the only teacher doing chem 150 and 202 labs. Good luck kiddos
CHEM 202 and CHEM 202L are going to be difficult classes, but McCormick makes the class digestible and as easy to follow as possible. Do the pre-labs, show up to class, and you should be fine. The final grade is heavily dependent on the notebook checks and final test, so prioritize those and don't worry.
I've only ever seen him twice the entire semester. The class is really dependent on the TA, and the grade is based on notebooks and the final test. The notebook rubrics are arbitrary, and he doesn't explain what is expected in the notebooks. The final is made extremely hard for no reason and he doesn't help you prepare. Avoid if you can.
I have finished all the premed courses (including 203 and 204) before taking 202L. This was my lowest grade out of all those courses. The scavenger hunts ask the most obnoxiously specific questions that no normal person would write down, and the final test is the same difficulty as the hw quizzes, but double the questions in half the time.
Lectures bf labs are absolutely useless, and the rest entirely depends on TAs. Mainly graded on notebooks and tests. Scavenger hunts ask for details that no one would write down; just write down every step and observation. Work with ur friends together, and quizzes will be fine. The final was 40 multiple-choice questions with an average of 80.
McCormick is very by the book- fair, uptight, won't cut you any slack. He's smart, thorough, clear and devoted. Workload is rough for 2 credits; he's truly alright, frustrating at times but definitely not a reason to fade this class. A good notebook is PARAMOUNT to your success; tests are fine and notebook checks are too, as long as you study.
GO OVER THE TOP IN YOUR NOTEBOOK. PRAY YOU GET A GOOD TA. (only advice to pass the class)
First chem lab i have taken, you really do have to put down everything in your lab notebook to be prepared for your scavenger hunts, def take advantage of collaborating with friends on quizzes and the other assignments
Took Chem150L and 202L with him. 150L was a big adjustment, no having done AP chem as post-labs were confusing (they still are for 202L too). However, grading criteria is pretty fair and he is actually a nice person once you remove the fact that his assessments can be difficult. Chem 150L final was harder than Chem 202L final.
Okay. Imma cut to the chase and tell u what u need to know. McCormick isn't your "professor"; your grade and lab understandings come from your TA and what you study on your own. 2nd: scavenger hunts are not that bad. the observations u need to write down are pretty self-explanatory (any physical, chemical changes, lab partner name).
202L is easier than 150L and I think he enjoys it more bc he was more easygoing. Write EVERYTHING in your notebook. Post labs are easier too. Make sure u get nearly 100s in everything bc final weighs a TON. Pray u get a good TA bc they grade everything. McCormick doesn't BS but he's a fun guy - just do all the work on time and you'll be fine.
barely teaches, your lab depends on your TA. make sure to write down everything you do in lab in your notebook. post labs make no sense so go to office hours/ or work with a friend. somehow passed the final but still not exactly sure what we learned this semester. basically teaching yourself but it's chill, just make sure you have a good notebook.
Painful. Meaningless. Waste of time.
How much help you get rly does depend on your TA's as he's really only there for pre-lab lectures (which there aren't that many) but just ask for help when you can, prepare well, and write EVERYTHING DOWN. But I don't think he's as awful as everyone makes him out to be.
Gave essentially no materials for the final that is 23% of overall grade. Also, 94 is an A in this course, not the standard 93.
i mean the actual lab itself is fine if you have a chill TA and good LA, but he's so picky with what he wants in your lab notebook so make sure you write down every single color you ever see because McCormick is obsessed with knowing you can see colors. I personally walk out of Chem lab every day wishing it had exploded with me in it.
The post labs suck. Your grade is either screwed or not depending on who your TA is. His grading for confidence checks is kind of hard to determine. He doesn't give a clear answer when you ask questions. You don't actually learn concepts, he expects you to already know them. Pray you had a good HS chem teacher.
Grades are not shown online, don't know until after class is over. The work you put in for post-labs accounts for a small percent of the grade, and what impacts your grade is stuff you don't have much control over.
You spend most of your time on labs, which count for 5% of your grade. He is super unhelpful and looks to make the class hard, only saw him once all semester besides the two lectures. The test is hard and requires you to understand topics never covered, and the notebook is designed to screw you. Awful design class, and awful professor.
His "mandatory textbook" is hard to understand with little background chemistry knowledge provided. Final takes up 30% of your grade and most of them are questions you rarely see in your homework or anything.
I keep coming back to this to think about how I can form a respectful review in under 350 characters about how awful lab is compared to my other classes. but im not gonna waste time because the other reviews already say everything I want to say. I did fine, but sheeeeeeesh. good luck, hes the only lab teacher there is
The only thing you can hope to do is get a good TA. Some TAs give points for some things other TAs wouldn't for the scavenger hunt. This is 25% of your grade. The end of year test is NOT curved and is a little difficult. The majority of your time is post labs that are 5% of your grade. Write EVERYTHING down in your notebook and say a prayer.
eh like it's not IMPOSSIBLE to do well, but he has the weirdest grading. 5% of your grade takes up 98% of your time, and if you have a harsh TA, get ready to spend a LOT of time on post-labs. Tests, scavenger hunt, and mid-semester quiz are the bulk of your grade and are extremely hard to do well on bc you don't know what will be on them. good luck
this class is completely TA dependent - some grade harshly, others don't care, so pray you get a good TA. the lab test is really hard but if you study well and make a good cheat sheet it is doable. do not mess up your confidence checks and always ask your LA or TA for help. lectures are pointless and not worth going to.
It's very TA dependent. You don't see much of McCormick at all, and the most he will ever contact you directly is at the end of the semester for grades. Make sure you keep a thorough lab notebook, and literally write everything down. He's unfair with the curving because some classes get a huge one and some get none. End of yr test is very difficult
My TA was great but McCormick is very intimidating. The most I saw of him was in pre-lab lectures, which were useless, and when he told me my lab station wasn't set up correctly. The post-lab assignments seemed very important yet ended up only being 5% of the final grade, which is stupid considering they were often long and we had one every week.
His terms are set clear; he is a strict stick-to-the-book kind of guy. He won't do you any favors. My TA was amazing, and most are. Make sure to write any small little observation, even if it's as simple as "water is clear." The notebook matters the most; a perfect notebook=A. Post-lab is for finals prep mainly (5%).the hardest is the last 2 weeks
His notebooks and preclass work were notoriously hard and took an exceptionally long time. The lab tests were also very difficult but he lets you take a cheat sheet with you. You will probably not use it but it was nice to have. Labs were very stressful because a lot of it is based on accuracy of your results. Overall good prof and manageable tho
If you don't write down the most simple, basic, commonly know description of a substance you will do terribly on the notebook check and do poorly in the class. Do the post labs (most work but only 5% of grade which SUCKS) and you might be more prepared for the final which lowkey blindsides you. Grade is locked in Canvas until end of semester.
For an intro class, Dr. McCormick kind of expects you to know a lot, but if you've taken AP/IB Chem, this class will be a breeze. When writing notebooks, make sure that you follow the lab notebook how-to chapter. Post-labs useful, and if you understand how to do them, you'll get an A on the final.
This class is a LOT. You won't see a lot of Dr McCormick except for pre-lab lectures, office hrs, and the occasional instructional vid on Canvas. Good guy and approachable though. The labs are incredibly intense and an unsupportive environment. Grading on post-labs is TA dependent, but be prepared to allot a lot of time each wk for these.
The final exam and midterm are mainly based on the post labs, so if you understand those and submit them on time you should be fine. They are difficult, but he doesn't mind if you consult your friends or the TAs. There are also 2 extra credit opportunities that are basically free points. Also, make sure to keep a thorough lab notebook.
Standard chem lab. There's a lot of pre-lab work but if you do it well it makes the lab go by really fast. Pretty much ended early every week. Mid-semester quiz and final exam were easy if you prepare. Plenty of extra credit opportunities - save parking tokens for end of semester extra credit. I had a great TA which made my experience even better.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
96%
Textbook Required
5%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-1.00 avg changeRatings by Course
221L
5.0
(1)CHEM204L
4.3
(4)CHEM221222LAB
4.0
(2)CHEM222L
4.0
(5)CHEM2O4L
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
CHEM
5.0
CHEM100
4.5
CHEM202L
3.8
150L
3.6
CHEM150L
3.4