3.7

Michael Sudduth

Religion - San Francisco State University

3.7
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
83%
Would Retake
147
Reviews
3.7
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
3.8
Helpful
3.7
Clarity

83%

Would Retake

147

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

75

4

26

3

17

2

7

1

22

What Students Say

Soft-spoken, easygoing, has a great sense of humor

PHIL502 - 5.0 rating

Best teacher I have had

PHIL110 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

36%

Textbook Required

67%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 30 grades
Most common grades:
A (15)
B- (4)
A- (4)
Grade Distribution
A(17)B(6)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 30 reported grades
A: 15
B-: 4
A-: 4
B+: 3
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (11)
Get ready to read (10)
Hilarious (7)
EXTRA CREDIT (7)
Participation matters (5)
Accessible outside class (5)
Respected (4)
Lots of homework (4)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.38 avg change
May
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

RE01

5.0

(1)

RELS300

5.0

(1)

PHIL321

5.0

(1)

PHIL500

4.5

(4)

PHILO300

4.5

(2)
+12 more courses
Difficulty by Course

302

4.0

PHIL011010S20R

4.0

PHIL500

3.5

RE01

3.0

REL300

3.0

Reviews (147)
5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Nov 1, 2007

This is the easiest class of ur life. U read a couple books if u want. Take a couple exams which will be a piece of a cake if u fill out the study guide b/c all the questions r on the test. Attendance.. come when u feel like it, b/c he does the same. & just bring some popcorn for all the stories.. ohh yeah & u watch a movie..

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Dec 12, 2007

He's a very laid back professor for a upper division class. He makes his quizzes at you really don't need to spend lots of time studying for his quizzes maybe about 1-2 hrs are enough. His assignments are very easy as long as you follow his lecture notes. Recommended to everyone!

4.0
1.0
PHIL502
Dec 12, 2007

For an upper division philosophy class you would expect this one to be tough, but he is the easiest professor you can take. Exams are easy if you just fill out the study guide. Written assignments are usually only a page long. Stress free class. Recommend him to everyone.

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
Dec 14, 2007

Professor Sudduth does have an easy class. But that's because he presents everything clearly and up front. None of the crazy "I'll give you a crumb and expect you to find the whole cake on your own" BS that a lot of teachers have. He tells you what he wants you to know instead of making you guess. If you attend class and pay attention, you'll do ok

3.0
3.0
PHIL110
Dec 14, 2007

Ask him about his haunted house.

4.0
1.0
PHIL502
Dec 17, 2007

good class to take and nobody can beat sudduth's stories

3.0
3.0
PHIL105
Jan 28, 2008

I was pretty interested in philosophy but not so much anymore. Your grade is graded on quizzes which I found pretty hard. I failed one, and didn't do so well on the others, and got a C- for the course. The assignments were pretty easy. The movies we watched were great.

5.0
3.0
PHIL500
Apr 21, 2008

I think he's very interesting and a very good teacher! I recommend! funny guy =)

3.0
2.0
MEDIEPHIL
Aug 23, 2008

Sudduth is a nice guy and he was understanding when I forgot to bring a paper to class, etc., but for someone who has no interest in Med. Phil., this class was painful. It was really boring and he's a pretty cocky guy. He had some good stories but always let us out of class late. A few easy papers were due and attendance doesn't matter.

3.0
2.0
PHIL105
Dec 16, 2008

He is interested in specifics for the papers.If you hit the head of the hammer right on each nail then he is very easy, but otherwise he does not always mention EXACTLY what he wants and you have to play guesswork. Very knowledgeable in his subject and interesting class. Unorganized, takes the entire semester to get back papers. Easy exams

5.0
3.0
RE01
Dec 17, 2008

Fair and consistent, tries to keep students engaged by asking questions that provoke thoughtful knowledgeable answers - so read before class! A little too 'philosophic' sometimes, but that goes with the territory.

4.0
2.0
PHIL525
Dec 17, 2008

Prof. Sudduth was a great teacher. He was fun, kept us interested, and loved the subject that he taught. The readings tended to be more difficult to get through, but other than that, it was an all around great class. As long as you read the readings, you're good to go.

4.0
2.0
PHIL525
Dec 20, 2008

I thought the subject itself was interesting, but going to class wasn't always. (I tend to drift off during repetition, but not everyone gets a topic the first time around.) William James (textbook) is a bit of a windbag, but the NDE stuff is pretty interesting. You don't need to show up to class, but if you don't, make sure you do the reading!

5.0
4.0
PHIL525
Dec 30, 2008

The classes I have taken with Sudduth have changed my perspective on religion, death, and on my own life.He asks thought provoking questions and is willing to share the abundance of knowledge he has. Class is very passable, but NOT an easy A. Read the text, go to class, and participate, and you will come out a different person

4.0
4.0
PHIL525
Jan 1, 2009

Dr. Sudduth is an amazing teacher. He cares for the topic and cares what the students have to say. The text is a bit boring, and Dr. Sudduth does not always clarify what he wants in the papers. But it's philosophy... makes you think. He tells a lot of stories but they are fun, and some fit in with the topic. Awesome professor.

5.0
4.0
PHIL525
Jan 6, 2009

Class is partly lecture, partly discussion. I liked the readings on Hinduism most. Multiple choice mid-term exam and final, and two papers, but one is a rewrite. Sudduth mixes humor with insights about religious ideas. Open to student opinions.

5.0
4.0
PHIL105
Jan 6, 2009

Professor Sudduth is an awesome teacher! I like the way that he shares funny stories with the class to keep us interested.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Jan 9, 2009

Horrible teacher. I was really interested in this class and was dissappointed by his lack of depth and knowledge in the subject. Too many off topic stories as well.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Jan 11, 2009

Boring and difficult

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Jan 11, 2009

Other person put the same comments twice. i'll do the same. Class was too late in the afternoon for me but Sudduth made it bearable. Never heard of Zoroastrianism before. Cool religion. Don't know whose putting these negative comments. Sudduth is not a bad teacher. Give it up hater!

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Jan 13, 2009

This is one of those do it yoursel classes. Showing up was unnecessary. Stay home and just read the books and review the powerpoints. He tells too many stories and thinks he is a comedian. Tests and essays are fairly hard. More factual information on each religion and less personal interpretation would have been nice.

3.0
2.0
PHIL105
Jan 14, 2009

Sudduth is really knowledgeable on the discussed topics. Definitely do the readings, sometimes they're pretty interesting. While attendance isn't incredibly necessary, he did about 5 pop in-class writings that counted towards your grade. Go see the TA to prepare for midterm paper. Sudduth is humorous and the class is relatively easy.

2.0
4.0
PHIL105
Jan 17, 2009

Nothing spectacular

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Jan 19, 2009

I was dissapointed to see such bias towards the eastern religions. Even Zorastrianism was covered in depth despite being comparatively small in membership worldwide. The old testament was barely covered let alone tested on. Only take this if your primary interest is Hindu, Buddhism, etc. Even mesopotamian religion was covered with more detail. Sad.

4.0
4.0
PHIL502
Jan 23, 2009

i agree with the other student. i would like to have seen more stuff on western religion, but sudduth had health problems this semester that forced him to cut out a lot of material. Be fair here. The material covered was interesting and for the most part clearly taught. his stories keep many of interested when the readings didn't.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Jan 24, 2009

Have to agree with the other guy. Uneven material focus. Dude could have assigned the readings via email and posted the powerpoints online so being sick was no excuse. He reuses the presentations so its not like he needed to make new ones. I pay money for the full material, not some edited version. Less stories and he could have made up lost time.

5.0
4.0
PHIL502
Jan 25, 2009

Not easy not extremely hard. Professor helped me a lot with the final paper. Enjoyed Buddhism readings most.

5.0
2.0
PHIL525
Jan 25, 2009

Wow. Don't recall Sudduth having haters like this. 2 years of positive comments. Now trashed. Sad. Rel. Experience was insightful and fun. Took world religions with sudduth a year ago. Seem to recall a lot of material on western religion.

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
Jan 26, 2009

Good class. You read largely primary texts of the traditions, instead of a dry college textbook. Prof made it interesting with stories. I personally found the material on the Gita worth the entire course. But that's just me.

5.0
4.0
PHIL502
Feb 15, 2009

we didn't cover all the material I was looking forward to, but Sudduth was very helpful. Nice guy. sorry to see him bashed by some of my classmates. Probably those deadbeats in the back row with the attention span of a 2 yr old.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Apr 8, 2009

Garbage biased teacher. Not helpful and very disrespectful.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Aug 15, 2009

Mr. Sudduth is a very exciting teacher. He definitely respects student opinions. I thought the class was easy. Two exams and in class writing. he makes you think hard. Not for slackers.

1.0
5.0
PHIL105
Aug 15, 2009

Only respects your opinion if you are 100% not scientific or logical and instead, try to appear intellectual by spewing forth nonsense theories. Painful and unfunny. Tries way to hard telling stories as well.

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
Aug 23, 2009

Prof. Sudduth made religion come alive to me. Great power points. Two exams. Study questions helped a lot. Great interaction with other students in the class.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Oct 14, 2009

Awful. Lame jokes. Wouldn't answer my questions, just gave nagative responses and insults. Not helpful or fair at all. Take a different professor.

5.0
4.0
PHIL502
Oct 29, 2009

Professor refused to waste time answering silly questions. Provided positive responses to intelligent questions. Most of the class laughs at the man's jokes. What more can we ask for? And he makes the texts speak to us. Very helpful. Don't take anyone else.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Nov 2, 2009

Really hard teacher. Also relied far too much on his thoroughly unhelpful TA. Didn't want to teach the class himself. Really a bad guy. I would take a different professor. The others all care so much more and put more into their classes.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Nov 21, 2009

Wow. I have no idea who would give this guy a decent, let alone good review. Scattered lectures, often misses class, horrible arrogant TA, refusal to answer questions, excessive self-aggrandizing tirades, lack of course direction, inability to explain grading and requirements, frequent unnecessary tangential stories, and really REALLY bad humor.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Dec 7, 2009

Worst professor in the entire department. Take any other one.

5.0
4.0
REL300
Dec 14, 2009

interesting class about God and religion. professor made the class fun with different stories and i liked the part of the course about near death experiences. midterm exam and final exam. two papers but he let's you rewrite your midterm paper. helped me a lot with my paper.

5.0
1.0
PHIL525
Dec 15, 2009

Very insightful teacher with a sense of humor. We read Wiliam James for most of the course. It changed my ideas about religion. Sudduth knows his stuff. Also he used to be a heavy metal guitarist. Awesome. God and rock. I wouldn't recommend anyone else.

5.0
4.0
PHIL502
Jan 5, 2010

I liked this class a lot. Sudduth got us talking about religion. He's very open to student opinions. I learned a lot from the class. His teaching assistant Wolfgang was helpful too.

2.0
3.0
PHIL502
Jan 9, 2010

Hmm..Ok at first, but I lost all interest with Christianity, didn't even show up for a lot of the 2nd half but still did really well. Wish he did some Islam; don't know much about it. Just do the readings and definitely review his power points on iLearn. Worst TA ever(Wolfgang). Make sure he is not grading your stuff,or you will regret it forever!!

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
Jan 10, 2010

class was well worth it. professor was funny and helpful with assignments. I liked that he tried to show the unity of the religions. TA wasn't that bad. I had rebecca. She seemed more easy going than the other guy. Over all, I learned a lot from the class. Not sure about these negative comments people are leaving, I would recommend the class.

5.0
2.0
REL300
Jan 13, 2010

Class about religious experience. Professor taught the course himself. No TAs. He was fair on his grading. Offered me a lot of comments to improve the paper for a rewrite. I found him genuinely helpful. Would recommend, especially if you're interested in God, philosophy, and the afterlife. Got me thinking....

2.0
4.0
PHIL101
Jan 13, 2010

Lousy Professor. Asked him for help on my midterm essay and he told me there was nothing he could do. His TA (wolfgang) had his nose a little too high in the air and is going to make an equally lousy professor. Sudduth is a good lecturer, but not very reliable for extra help.

5.0
3.0
PHIL502
Jan 14, 2010

Huh? Not helpful? No way. Sudduth spent time with me going over my paper and giving me suggestions. Did well on the rewrite. Philosophy isn't my thing but the class was good. Sudduth made things interesting and has a lot of passion about religion but lets students share their own ideas.

4.0
3.0
PHIL502
Apr 20, 2010

I don't know why students are complaining about this professor? the T.A.'s are NOT the teacher. He is awesome. Such a down to earth guy and super easy going. He lets you out of class early a lot. My favorite class of the semester. Gives you all his powerpoints online read those and you will pass your test. Take his class i promise it will be worth

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
May 12, 2010

Fun and smart teacher. Learned a lot in this class. Must have a new TA because this guy is cool. Highly recommend.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
May 27, 2010

The worst class I've ever taken. I don't care about getting out early, humor, or his pathetic guitar stories from back in the day. I care about learning the material and being graded clearly. I understand if individual time is limited to emails due to large class sizes, however his arrogance, belittling tone, and inability to teach are unacceptable

1.0
5.0
REL300
May 27, 2010

The only advice to give is to avoid this professor.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
May 28, 2010

Now for comments from a different student, other than the same student repeating negative posts. Sudduth was totally helpful in meeting with me to talk about my work. I learned a lot from the class, especially about Hinduism. His TA was also very helpful. Grading was completely clear and fair.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
May 28, 2010

Sudduth is a down to earth teacher who cares about his students. He tells helpful stories which illustrate philosophic insights. These negative ratings are clearly a cruel joke of some sort.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
May 28, 2010

I think this class was pretty easy. I got a lot of it. I enjoyed the Bhagavad Gita, and also John's Gospel. Sudduth explains the difficult ideas well. He always asks for student questions and gives respectful answers. He's almost too nice at times. He puts study questions and powerpoints on iLearn. You know exactly what to study.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
May 29, 2010

Cool class. Learned some mind blowing stuff on Hinduism. Professor seemed really into it. TA did a good job. Watched the movie Jacob's Ladder. Liked that. A couple of multiple choice exams. Some short papers. Highly recommend.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
May 29, 2010

Awesome class. Teacher was always available to talk to me after class. Very interesting guy. Take this class! Don't believe the negative ratings.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
May 29, 2010

Good class for an introduction to philosophy and religion. Some of the readings like Augustine were difficult to get into. But I liked the bhagavad gita, and professor Sudduth has some very helpful powerpoints. He's also a nice teacher. I liked his teaching style.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
May 31, 2010

Wasn't really interested in philosophy and religion until this class. Mr. Sudduth was a very helpful teacher. We studied a lot from Hinduism and Buddhism and also Augustine. Mr. Sudduth offered the class extra credit and did everything possible to make sure students did well on the exams.

4.0
2.0
PHIL502
Jun 2, 2010

Teacher is relatively easy. Attendance is not mandatory and all of the lecture notes are posted online. Just read the assigned texts, and do the papers and you'll be fine and pass with decent grade.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Aug 4, 2010

He is a great teacher i had him for introduction to philosophy and world religions and did well in both classes. He is very objective and will answer any questions you have. Class is mostly lectures and power points. If you pay attention in class you don't need to read all the material, he gives study questions of exactly what is on the test.

1.0
5.0
PHIL502
Aug 14, 2010

I didn't appreciate the general negativity and superiority complex he has. Class was not very good, and the presentation of the material was monotonous. Don't bother going to class, just read the books.

2.0
3.0
PHIL525
Oct 20, 2010

If you thinking of taking his class I strongly urged you NOT to do so. I have a lot of interest in the subject of religion and he made it utterly and entirely boring. His lectures are immensely dull, he paces back and forth while staring at the floor, it is very difficult to be engaged. It is a total waste of time to go to class.

1.0
5.0
PHIL105
Dec 8, 2010

Wish I took a different professor or waited for another semester. This guy was horrible. His class this semester was the worst philosophy course I have taken at SFSU. I won't be taking him again. Like others said, don't take him. If you do, don't bother with class, just read the books. He botches the info with his bias anyways.

5.0
2.0
PHIL525
Dec 8, 2010

Interesting class. Professor was very helpful with my mid-term paper. Not sure why some students are giving him a negative rating. Doesn't make sense to me. He's a friendly and well-informed teacher.

5.0
1.0
PHIL525
Dec 11, 2010

Very approachable and fun teacher. Got an A on the midterm paper and Sudduth still provided lots of comments. Cares a lot about the subject matter and students. Highly recommended.

5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Dec 11, 2010

I agree with the positive ratings. Professor was very helpful. Offers a lot of extra credit. Explains exactly what will be on exams. Really hard to do badly in this class.

5.0
1.0
RELS300
Dec 12, 2010

Course on religious experience. Some very intriguing readings and class discussion. Sudduth is a very flexible teacher. I would recommend him to any serious student. So he stares at the floor occasionally when he's thinking through issues. He definitely engages the students. One of the best philosophy and religion classes I've taken.

4.0
3.0
PHIL105
Dec 15, 2010

He's a good teacher and he knows his stuff it's just that he doesn't do the grading, his TA does.Not from my mouth, it's from his and the TAs. So in my opinion that creates the biased view, plus the TA will teach once in awhile and sometimes he switches up the topics. Idk it's up to you to take this class. I wouldn't recommend it.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Dec 15, 2010

Strange comments. Was in the same class as the other student. The TA only taught the class once and he did NOT do all the grading. TA only graded our response papers, not exams, which was totally easy! Anyhow, the TA taught his own philosophy classes at SFSU before. He seemed to know what he was doing. I liked him. So chill. :)

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Dec 17, 2010

Pretty easy class. Professor puts powerpoints on ilearn and provides study questions. Two exams multiple choice, and two papers. Reading isn't too demanding. Some of the topics were a bit boring but some were interesting. Liked the stuff on eastern religion most.

1.0
3.0
PHIL525
Dec 20, 2010

Sudduth is terrible. The class was an unfathomable waste of time. Don't bother with this guy, he just plain sucks.

5.0
2.0
PHIL525
Dec 20, 2010

I thought the class was fascinating and well organized. Sudduth was extremely helpful. But philosophy is not for everyone.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Dec 21, 2010

Entertaining professor. You learn about different religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity. Not so much historical. More ideas focused. A lot of class discussion, some power points, and some lectures. Liked the comparisons between the Koran and the Bible.

5.0
1.0
REL300
Dec 25, 2010

Sudduth is awesome! Loved this class!

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Dec 29, 2010

Prof. Sudduth really did a good job at explaining how western and eastern religious philosophies are similar. His stories kept many of us interested. Be aware that uses a TA, but the TA was very friendly and fair.

1.0
5.0
PHIL105
Jan 3, 2011

Professor Sudduth was pretty bad but nothing horrible. He should really cover all religions equally and without bias. I just wish I had taken a different professor. The TA is the real problem. What an arrogant young man. Sudduth should really do the grading and all lectures himself, as well as fix up his own errors. Until then, I would go elsewhere

4.0
4.0
PHIL502
Jan 4, 2011

I really enjoyed this class. He breaks down a religion to the core tenets in a power point and then uses the texts to build around those core tenets. His essays require you to think but they clearly have a way out. He gives great examples and shares personal analogies. I highly recommend him.

2.0
4.0
PHIL105
Apr 10, 2011

The TA that grades everything in this class is ridiculous. Grades the papers SO harshly. No one got an A on the last paper. Wouldn't recommend this class because of the TA. Also, even if you write a good paper, you won't get an A if the TA doesn't like your writing style.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
May 11, 2011

Great professor! Super passionate about the subject, and extremely well versed with the material. The midterm and final aren't bad at all if you attend class and take good notes. He actually goes over exactly what'll be on the exams the day before. My only complaint would be his TA. He graded the papers unreasonably harsh.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
May 11, 2011

Fairly simple class. Grade is based on several short essays, all of which are easy as long as you can write at a college-level, and Multiple choice final + midterm. Class is mostly lecture, occasionally discussion. Can be dull sometimes, but he tries to keep it interesting w/ humor. Approachable and very knowledgeable.

4.0
2.0
PHIL105
May 16, 2011

I can get A's on my papers in English classes here at SF State but can't manage to get above a C on the papers in this class. Sudduth is very cool and funny but unfortunately I wouldn't recommend this class.

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
May 21, 2011

awesome professor, knows his stuff, very helpful, very arguable, 2 tests (50ques)from study guide and lecture material, 2 essays . the only thing is if the TA sucks it could effect the essay but the prof would over rid his TA . Fun class, do well on the essays and the test.

4.0
4.0
PHIL502
May 27, 2011

I really liked him. His TA (Gunik? sp?) was also pretty cool. The lectures were pretty interesting, a few powerpoints. He made tests pretty easy to study for. However, they were pretty harsh on grading the papers. For the first one, they never specified they wanted a "references" page and took off half a grade for EVERYONE. Otherwise, a good class.

4.0
3.0
PHIL105
Jun 2, 2011

He gives out the lectures quite clearly and even goes over the assigned reading which is good since it is sometimes hard to follow. He makes his tests fairly easy and goes as far as to giving hints. It really boils down to which TA you get since the TA grades the papers. Our TA was a bit of a harsh grader and didn't even tell us where to improve.

3.0
3.0
RELS696
Jul 17, 2011

A hands-off class, where all you have to do is write a long research paper. If you stay on task and don't wait till the last minute, it's easy. Hard to grade Sudduth, because all he really did was collect the essays. He didn't really instruct at all.

1.0
5.0
PHIL105
Jul 26, 2011

Like many others have said, Sudduth is tolerable. He could improve by balancing out his coverage of religions though without only focusing on a few in ridiculous depth. His TA is the most arrogant pompous fool I have ever met. It is Sudduth's responsibility to replace a TA when they lecture horribly and grade even worse. Take another professor.

4.0
3.0
PHIL502
Dec 14, 2011

It's the cutest thing when we talk about religious ideas of love and he applies them to his girlfiend. He's a dork and makes you love the guy. Class is clear and interesting, tests are easy if you study detail, but TA grades essays in which you have to say what THEY want for an already vague prompt.

4.0
1.0
PHIL105
Dec 18, 2011

He is a really cool and funny teacher, and his class is easy but interesting. He likes to tell stories about his life in relation to the lectures which is always funny and engaging. I recommend him for Intro to Philosophy and Religions.

4.0
3.0
PHIL105
Jan 3, 2012

Sudduth is a cool guy, come to class, read the notes/pp's he posts online and you will do fine. Also, make sure to do the study guides before the exams, they really help.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Jan 5, 2012

Professor Sudduth was a very helpful and enthusiastic teacher. I like how he presented the readings in class with lots of personal examples from everyday life. Study questions and powerpoint slides are on ilearn and he does a review before each exam. Good intro to philosophy of religion.

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Jan 10, 2012

Very good teacher. Learned a lot about different religions. He does a lot of comparisons between religions, like Hinduism and Christianity. Some cool power points, helpful notes and study questions on Ilearn. TA was pretty good too. Would have liked a better grade but still a cool class.

4.0
2.0
PHILO300
Feb 3, 2012

Good lecture, clear in material. You must do the study guide if you want to do well on the exams

3.0
2.0
PHIL105
May 6, 2012

Sudduth is a fantastic lecturer! The guy is incredibly knowledgable about the subject and makes learning about religion very interesting. 5 response papers throughout the semester. All of them graded by the TA who graded really easily. 2 tests, a midterm and final. Both are fairly easy. MAKE SURE YOU READ. If you don't, you WILL be lost.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
May 29, 2012

Sudduth knows this subject really well and makes religion interesting. The response papers are fairly easy and the study guides for the the exams are really helpful. Just make sure you do the study guides while reading the books.

4.0
4.0
PHIL105
Nov 16, 2012

He is absolutely a GENIUS. He gets a bit...large, with his concepts, but he truly is a mindblowing guy, he'll literally just blow your mind almost daily, and use excellent anologies and give a great analysis of many religious of the world and you'll learn more than what you expected. just make sure to actually read! He was also a rock star/stoner..

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Dec 10, 2012

Great professor. Highly recommend him. I didn't even read that much, but you don't have to go to class, most of the notes are on iLearn. 5 papers, but only gave 4 for us and gave us A's on the last one. His TA grades really easily. He's really funny but also helpful as he shows interest in the subject.

3.0
4.0
PHIL500
Dec 10, 2012

a little hard. He uses very deep philosophical language which can be somewhat confusing at times. Only take if philosophy is your major or if you truly have a genuine interest in it.

5.0
1.0
PHIL105
Dec 23, 2012

Overall, great professor. The topics covered in class were interesting. Though it can be boring since the class was late in the afternoon. Papers and exams were fairly easy. Materials on iLearn are really helpful if you don't want to read. Definitely recommend him.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Jan 7, 2013

Amazing professor. He is beyond brilliant. If you're not interested in religion (whether for it or against it) his lecture may bore you but its mind bending! Plus attendance is not mandatory. 4 papers and two exams. I finished to papers without completely reading the texts. Before exams he goes over the exact answers for a lot of the qs!

5.0
1.0
PHIL502
Feb 9, 2013

Professor Sudduth is excellent and passionate of what he teaches. If you're interested in world religions I would definitely recommend this class. The lectures aren't mandatory but I would recommend to go because he makes a lot of good jokes too. The grading is based solely on 2 papers and 3 tests, all of which are easy if you study.

5.0
4.0
PHIL525
Feb 15, 2013

Dr. Sudduth is passionate about what he teaches. He is clearly brilliant and has a way of making deep philosophical concepts resonate in my own life. It's clear that he cares about his students and the content. I HIGHLY recommend.

1.0
5.0
PHIL105
Sep 8, 2013

Sudduth didn't seem like a bad guy, just a really bad teacher.

5.0
3.0
PHIL105
Dec 17, 2013

I absolutely ADORE Dr. Sudduth. This class was absolutely amazing and eye opening. He was very passionate about everything he taught, and was always willing to answer any questions. There are essays for each book you read though, so be sure to read or at least pay good enough attention in the lecture. I wish I could retake this class again.

5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Grade: A
Dec 25, 2013

Sudduth is a great guy who clearly cares about what he is lecturing on. The class is based on 5 different books you have to read, so if you don't like reading this class isn't for you. We had 3 take home papers that were pretty confusing to write about but the TA was a very lenient grader. 1 midterm/1 final all based on his review sheets study that

4.0
1.0
PHIL502
Feb 14, 2014

He's a really nice guy who's passionate about Hinduism. The only person in the class who had a problem with him was someone who believed in Hinduism as well, and got unnecessarily offended by Sudduth's way of teaching it. This guy is a PhD in philosophy and has been studying Hinduism for years, so I'm preeetty sure he knows what he's talking about.

1.0
1.0
PHIL502
Feb 25, 2014

Not the best teacher. The books and the topics are interesting, but he rants a lot. He is highly knowledgable about western religions, but eastern ones seem to confuse him. He repeats himself, and concepts multiple times. Take it with another professor.

5.0
4.0
PHIL502
May 5, 2014

By far one of the greatest professors i have had. Class is difficult, but gets easier if you do the readings. Listen to his lectures he is a professor that is truly interested and connected to what he teaches, good show.

3.0
4.0
PHIL502
May 14, 2014

DON'T TAKE THIS CLASS IF YOU WANT AN EASY SEGMENT III. If you want to do well, the class will be tedious, with a lot of reading, and the final paper is very difficult if you don't fully read and understand the first book.

5.0
4.0
PHIL500
Grade: B-
May 16, 2014

I LOVE Michael Sudduth, I've taken classes with him before but by far the hardest class I've taken at SFSU. Don't take it unless you're a philosophy major or planning on doing something with philosophy. Attendance isn't mandatory so it's hard to find motivation to go.

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
May 19, 2014

Sudduth is one of the best professors at SFSU. He is incredibly knowledgeable in the fields of philosophy and religious studies and makes his classes more like conversations with his students than straight lectures. Two papers (with feedback before final draft is due) and three exams which are easy if you study his study-guides. Take his class!

5.0
2.0
PHIL502
Jul 11, 2014

Took for GE seg 3. Sudduth is a sweetheart. Soft-spoken, easygoing, has a great sense of humor. Class was very relaxing and interesting. 3 exams on Hinduism, Buddhism, and Abrahamic religions (30% of grade for first two and 25% for final). 2 papers (5% for short reflection, 15% for term paper draft and 25% for term paperrewrite).

4.0
2.0
17936
Dec 5, 2014

I loved Intro to the Origin of Religion class with Sudduth because the amount of effort you put in was ALWAYS reflected in your grades. Are the lectures long? Yes the entire class is composed of lectures. Fair grading system, 3 papers, 4 quizzes, 1 final that is mixed. Quizzes always curved. Extremely knowledgeable and passionate guy.

3.0
2.0
17936
Dec 5, 2014

This class is very compelling and Michael has a lot to share. I would just like to point out though that if you are someone who needs homework in your grade to balance out tests, this isn't the class for you. There isn't any homework for intro to origin of religion at all. I also barely used any of the books so that was a waste of money.

5.0
3.0
PHIL500
Grade: A
Dec 19, 2014

I took this teacher almost 2 years ago and I can still say that Sudduth's world religions class was the best class ive taken at SFSU. Sudduth has some awesome stories and he's pretty funny too! I would take this class again if i could. Broadened my understanding of world religions and I actually use what I learned from this class in real life.

3.0
4.0
302
Grade: B-
May 3, 2015

He's an Oxford University PhD so he knows his stuff, but he lacks teaching skill. He will mostly only go over the essentials and leave all the details either to his outlines online or to your notes done on the readings. He tends to repeat the concepts over and over again. He WILL favor Eastern philosophy so be ready for that...

5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Sep 3, 2015

Best teacher I have had. I took critical thinking with him over the summer; not only did I immediately change my major to philosophy but am way ahead of everyone else in my Phil 205: Formal Logic class. Incredibly intelligent, funny stories, and even better lectures. HIGHLY recommend.

1.0
5.0
PHIL525
Jan 12, 2016

Don't take his class, I've never had a class more boring. You must do the reading to pass, and you honestly don't need to even come to class. I would not recommend taking this class, Ive never disliked a class as much as I did this one. The class consists of 2 exams, 1 midterm paper, and 50 question finale. If you don't have to take it, then don't.

4.0
2.0
PHIL502
Jun 3, 2016
Would take again

Easy class, two quizzes, a final. The study guides are very helpful. An essay, you get to do a first draft and get to improve on the final one. The bad thing is he read off the book which made class sort of boring but I would take him again

5.0
4.0
PHIL525
Grade: B-
Aug 23, 2016
Would take again

Mr. Sudduth is a great philosophy teacher I took him for five classes, and enjoyed all of them. Philosophy of Religion was the hardest class out of all of them. Great man, take him for the Natural of Religious Experience if you want to gain wisdom.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL105
Grade: A-
Dec 7, 2016
Would take again

Mr. Sudduth is a great lecturer and doesn't mind if you take awhile to catch up on the material. As long as you comprehend what he talks about in his lectures, and do well on quizzes / papers. He will pass you, he is definitely up there in terms of friendliness, humor and passion for his material. Tied for best philosophy teacher at SFSU hands down

3.0
5.0
PHIL110
Sep 6, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He is funny during lectures. You barely need to come to class to even pass, but a con to missing a class would be a cost of reading the chapter to yourself, at it is quite a length. Participation in this class is a must! He doesn't require everyone to speak, but you'll get a B if you just don't talk at all in class. I would say he is cool though!!!

Get ready to read
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
3.0
3.0
PHIL110
Dec 18, 2017
Would take again

He's a pretty cool dude, he spends a lot of class time going off on tangents. Definitely go to class-even if it's boring- he explains everything in detail and it's pretty easy to follow along. Do the homework, it's not too much work if you keep up. All of the answers are either in the back of the book or he goes over it in class.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
EXTRA CREDIT
3.0
2.0
PHIL101
Grade: B
Jan 2, 2018
Would take again

sudduth is a cool guy but his lectures can be really boring. he gets off track sometimes and it can be hard to focus. but he is really understanding if you're having issues with an assignment. class is not mandatory but still recommend going because he will often go over exact questions for test review and give the answers. also funny sometimes :)

Get ready to read
Hilarious
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Jan 17, 2018
Would take again

Michael's lectures are very long. I showed up to class everyday but paid no attention. I did homework and studied for tests on my own. Compared to other phil110 classes his class is less work. There are 3 exams, a final, and homework almost every night but is not collected until exam day. Its an easy class but beware that you'll be put to sleep.

Clear grading criteria
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
PHIL301
Grade: A
Dec 5, 2018
Would take again

Approx. 5 short response papers, 3 exams (one per section with study guides), a good size midterm paper, and a final exam (cumulative). Attendance not mandatory. Lectures relatively easy to follow (often goes off topic but the stories are interesting). Funny Professor. Interesting course. Easy A as long as you do all the assignments & study guides.

SO MANY PAPERS
Hilarious
TEST HEAVY
4.0
2.0
PHIL101
Grade: A-
Dec 19, 2018
Would take again

The professor was pretty fast at feedback and if you had any questions he was open to talk to you and walk you through your grades. Very lenient grader. Attendance isnt mandatory but I recommend it especially before an uncoming test because he usually goes over the exact exam!

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
Caring
2.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: A-
Dec 21, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I can tell that he tried and that he likes teaching, but he repeats himself in class a lot and so it felt like I didnt really have to go to class. However, his grading criteria was really specific and as long as you followed what he wanted its in Easy A

Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
PHILO300
Grade: A
Jul 26, 2019
Would take again

funny and boring at the same time. just come to class and listen, he will give exact exam problems and answers sometimes. best philosophy teacher at SFSU.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
4.0
PHIL101
Oct 25, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He's cool but there are too many videos that we have to watch.

Respected
Lots of homework
So many papers
5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Nov 14, 2019
Would take again

By far my favorite Phil prof. he's really easy going and his lectures are super easy to follow since his website is up to date everyday. however, he always goes off on tangents and talks a lot about his life in the 70's during band practice. they are pretty funny stories but can be really distracting which is why a lot of my friends are struggling.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Nov 27, 2019
Would take again

Phil 101 w sudduth is my favorite class! This is my favorite class because the work load is so easy and his lectures are entertaining. Reading is not necessary to pass, but the homework is. Sparknotes usually covers the reading material and he usually finds interesting videos/topics so hw is a breeze. 300 word response once a week. Easy af

Respected
Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
3.0
4.0
PHIL011010S20R
Grade: B-
May 18, 2020
Would take again

The lectures in the class aren't super engaging because the content of the class is largely based off of the textbook. He is nice and encourages students to speak up.

Lots of homework
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
2.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: B+
May 21, 2020
Wouldn't take again

As a person he is very entertaining. However, don't recommend taking him during these remote learning times. Assigned homework & never shared correct answers so by the time the tests came you didn't even know if you were doing it right and were understanding the concepts correctly. Seemed like they didn't want to be there to teach & COVID proved it

Participation matters
Hilarious
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
PHIL321
Dec 9, 2020
Would take again

I have had him for the past two semesters. Came into his Being and Knowing class after his Phil 101. He is educated on the course. Will always meet with you during office hours. Answers emails. Cares about his student's success. Weekly assignments. They are pretty easy, just care, and try when you write the responses. Attendance matters.

Respected
Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Jun 1, 2021
Would take again

The class is very straight forward and the grading criteria makes it easy for you to plan for things ahead. The T.A's grade your home-works and they answer you right away by email. He's a good lecturer and suggests good videos online to watch.

5.0
2.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Jan 18, 2022
Would take again

Pretty interesting guy, had him for online class. Always slept through the lectures so they aren't super important but I did the readings or looked up summaries. Do the response forums, he lays out everything you need to get full credit. Quizzes were easy, use the handouts he created to study because thats where he pulls questions from. Cool dude

Respected
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: B+
May 5, 2022
Would take again

easy going class, just do the assignments which is weekly due. his exams are multiple choice. you can also find the textbook online for free but all in all he's pretty cool

Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: A+
Dec 17, 2023
Would take again

He is awesome if you don't understand anything he has office hours every week. He gave 8 assignments, 3 Exam, 4 discussion forms and 5 extra credit the whole semester. he gives a lot of grace periods and he simply just gives you full credit for just completing the assignments.

EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
Accessible outside class
5.0
1.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Dec 29, 2023
Would take again

There are weekly online lectures over Zoom that you have to join for points. The tests are pretty easy if you pay attention. He gives a lot of extra credit points and gives a lot of extensions. Overall good professor, and would take him again.

EXTRA CREDIT
Amazing lectures
Online Savvy
4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
May 31, 2024
Would take again

Was an interesting class, but you really have to make sure you understand every concept in order to pass. You are tested on everything for the midterm and final exam. He seems like a cool guy, but it was a zoom class. Sometimes the lectures do get heavy and it is important to reach out if confused.

Get ready to read
Hilarious
4.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: A-
Nov 16, 2024
Would take again

The class is straightforward, with weekly assignments and easy-to-follow lectures. Though sometimes long and tangential, the professor is helpful and provides good study resources like unstuck ai. With some self-discipline, you can do well in this engaging course.

5.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Dec 27, 2024
Would take again

Sudduth is an excellent professor. He provides generous grace periods for turning in work, making deadlines manageable. The only significant requirement is watching a lot of videos, but overall, I would highly recommend taking his class!

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Accessible outside class
5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Dec 30, 2024
Would take again

Prof Sudduth is great! His online class is well-organized with a clear timeline, making it easy to stay on track. You'll need a book, (physical or e-book), and lectures are pre-recorded. He offers generous grace periods and sometimes extensions. For homework, just follow the prompts closely and you'll earn full points with ease. Highly recommend!

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Accessible outside class
5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Grade: A+
Jan 11, 2025
Would take again

He offered a lot of extra credit and grace periods. You will need a textbook. The assignments and the exams(2 exams) were not hard at all if you did your readings. You'll be able to pass with a good grade if you regularly do your assignments, extra credit, and the exams! The exams (mid-term and final) were all multiple-choice questions, super easy!

EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Mar 9, 2025
Would take again

Easy class. There's videos to watch, pages from the textbook to read, and assignments every week which are graded on completion. There are three tests (incl. final) in the semester, which all are online, open note, no time limit, and they're easy as long as you're watching the videos, doing the HW and the provided review sheets.

EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
Online Savvy
1.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: B
Dec 6, 2025

clear bias, 'right' answers are usually just his opinions... EG: - Spoke about a recent controversy of a hospital bombing in Gaza by the IDF. Argued: Due to the main impact occurring in the parking lot of said hospital, as opposed to directly hitting, the argument was invalid. Stated it was about source reliability, used IDF reports.

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Grade: B+
Dec 23, 2025
Would take again

Simple class with like an assignment due once a week based on the textbook. Assignments are relatively easy if you watch the videos or just go through the slides he provides. He is also very generous with grace periods and extensions on all assignments, discussions, and exams.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Lots of homework
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

36%

Textbook Required

67%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 30 grades
Most common grades:
A (15)
B- (4)
A- (4)
Grade Distribution
A(17)B(6)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 30 reported grades
A: 15
B-: 4
A-: 4
B+: 3
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (11)
Get ready to read (10)
Hilarious (7)
EXTRA CREDIT (7)
Participation matters (5)
Accessible outside class (5)
Respected (4)
Lots of homework (4)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.38 avg change
May
Nov
Dec
Jan
Mar
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

RE01

5.0

(1)

RELS300

5.0

(1)

PHIL321

5.0

(1)

PHIL500

4.5

(4)

PHILO300

4.5

(2)
+12 more courses
Difficulty by Course

302

4.0

PHIL011010S20R

4.0

PHIL500

3.5

RE01

3.0

REL300

3.0

Similar Professors