2.8

Nancy Chibry

Mathematics - University of Calgary

2.8
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
32%
Would Retake
212
Reviews
2.8
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
2.8
Helpful
2.8
Clarity

32%

Would Retake

212

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
212 total ratings

5

53

4

33

3

32

2

45

1

49

What Students Say

Hands down one of the most horrible professors at U of C

STATS321 - 1.0 rating

The final IS SO INSANE that someone collapsed in the middle of it and people were crying after

STAT321 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

69%

Textbook Required

88%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 31 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (8)
A- (8)
Not sure yet (7)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(6)C(0)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(16)
Based on 39 reported grades
B+: 8
A-: 8
Not sure yet: 7
B: 5
Common Tags
Tough Grader (9)
Lots of homework (9)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (6)
Caring (6)
Participation matters (5)
TEST HEAVY (5)
LECTURE HEAVY (5)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.18 avg change
Dec
May
Jul
Oct
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SCIE301

5.0

(1)

STAT213217

4.5

(2)

213

4.3

(4)

STAT2132

4.0

(1)

STAT213

3.5

(60)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

STAT333

5.0

STAT215

5.0

STAT327

5.0

STATS321

5.0

STAT321

4.4

Reviews (209)
3.0
3.0
STAT213
Aug 3, 2002

Nothing spetacular about her teaching. The final exam was challenging.

5.0
1.0
STAT211
Dec 12, 2002

No Comments

5.0
2.0
STAT213
Mar 11, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
STAT217
Apr 16, 2003

No Comments

4.0
2.0
STAT2132
Jun 7, 2003

Great Prof! The key to succeeding is to attend the lectures and get her notes first hand.

2.0
2.0
STAT213
Jun 18, 2003

Lectures are a fraud -- they bascially consist of her reading directly out of a book. Pages and pages of useless information... ...

2.0
3.0
STAT213
Aug 22, 2003

Useless lectures which consisted of her restating the textbook using poor examples. Very careless..lost all of my quizzes and gave me an F. I had to fight for weeks just to get the B+ that I had earned, and she never apologised for the screw-up.

2.0
5.0
STAT333
Oct 13, 2003

Meh....hard assignments and difficult quizzes....easy examples done in class which, as always, are of little help when attempting to slay one of her nightmare tests.

5.0
3.0
STAT213
May 14, 2004

hard quizzes and exams..beware! i loved her class notes..she writes a lot..but it's worth it in the end..don't bother getting a textbook..her notes are sufficient

2.0
4.0
STAT211
Jan 2, 2005

Lectures are ridiculously easy and tests are obscenely hard. And her TAs were useless. Beware!!

5.0
2.0
STAT213
Jan 10, 2005

Quizzes Easy, Midterm and Final tough but fair. Very friendly and helpful. Pretty easy on the eyes!!

3.0
4.0
STAT217
Apr 28, 2005

Lectures notes are over simplified quizes and midterms are a nightmare, TAs cant even speak enlgish

5.0
4.0
STAT217
Apr 30, 2005

really nice and approachable teacher! great TA. nice notes. totally easy to understand...quizzes ..ok..midterm HARD. if u visit her to talk bout stats. she will give u better grades! final..not so bad but still HARD HARD. still adore you Nancy! thank you for C-

5.0
4.0
STAT217
May 31, 2005

Quizzes are pretty easy, midterm was insanely brutal, and the final wasn't that bad. If you screw up royally, she does give you opportunities to make up for it, like bonus marks for going to get help. Even though the work is tough, she gives you as much marks as possible so you usually do better than you think. Fair prof, plus you don't need a text

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Jun 5, 2005

Lectures seem easy, Hard Quizzes, Hard Midterms, Hard Final. These claims of bonus marks for going to see her for help aren't necessarily true; she flipped on what she'd said earlier and told me she'd have to give them to the entire class or some BS like that. The final was 3.5 hours long and I barely finished, very few people left before it ended.

5.0
4.0
STAT217
Jul 12, 2005

Very clear teacher. I learned a lot in her course, plus there's no text and her notes are super organized. Assignments don't reflect quizzes, midterm, or final and all three can be hard. Overall, good teacher, very personable and easy to approach.

2.0
2.0
MATH323
Aug 22, 2005

Do all the homework and learn from the textbook or an obliging statistically inclined friend, or you will get worked over on tests. Maybe she doesn't teach this class often, but often what she'd say was mathematically duplicitous. (She said that a dot product was the same thing as a cross product, and many other patently incorrect statements.)

2.0
3.0
MATH323
Sep 9, 2005

Very poor teacher, she had a lot of trouble with the calculus bases material and continuously made fundamental mistakes. Her midterms and finals are very hard, and the questions on them are open to interpritation. Aviod the teacher, she gives extremely hard tests but refuses curve. Instead she uses a deflationary fixed grading scale that makes i

2.0
4.0
STAT217
Oct 9, 2005

Moves too quickly through notes as if shes doing homework for herself...difference is she is a stats proffesor and we aren't. Does many examples, just isnt good at conveying what it is she is teaching. Topics within the subject of stats blur together and get confusing.

2.0
4.0
STAT217
Nov 23, 2005

Wow, avoid taking this with her. Her notes seem good and her quizes are ok. But BLAM! All of a sudden, super tough midterm and BLAM! Super tough final.

3.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 21, 2005

In class you think you know the stuff. She makes quizes hard and he midterm and final are almost impossible to pass. NO ONE finished her final F05. Good for getting notes from in class and explaining things but take it from someone who makes easier tests.

4.0
2.0
STAT213217
Jan 4, 2006

Awesome prof. The quizes are hard so you have to learn the material! She's scaring you into learning the material, like any good math prof should.

3.0
3.0
STAT211
Jan 8, 2006

Lectures generally cover what needs to be done, but fell down when attempting to cover the area of material "surrounding" the midterm (between regular quizzes). Unfortunately, this was the most important area of material; be prepared to look a lot of stuff up yourself in the text rather than having it through lecture.

5.0
3.0
STAT217
May 3, 2006

Awesome prof. Do the assignments, study the examples and you will be golden! She made class pretty fun with her examples, had clear notes, and made sure that things were easy to understand. Take stats with her.

1.0
5.0
STATS213
May 16, 2006

She is possibly the worst professor ever. If you would ask her for help during your assigned lab time, she would just simply say "go look in your notes", and wouldn't attempt to help you at all. Her final was ridiculous. The class average overall was 62%, but she somehow managed to make 75% the B. Her quizzes were nothing like her assignments.

5.0
3.0
STATS217
Jun 11, 2006

Awesome prof! I think she is pregnant and not teaching now but if she is, take her class! She`s a really fair prof, nothing is particularily easy but she explains things very well and her notes are really clear. She`s also really friendly which is nice.

1.0
3.0
MATH321
Jul 7, 2006

Avoid if you can, especially if you're a math major.

3.0
3.0
MATH323
Aug 25, 2006

I took 321 with her also. She did too much of the same thing in class on one concept. Doesn't give good analogies when introducing new topics, nor does she do a good job of answering questions. I don't think she knows her stuff too well. Quizzes were decent, midterm & final were harder, but nothing too bad. Go with the other prof.

5.0
1.0
MATH323
Oct 28, 2006

One of the greatest profs I have had for math. I enjoyed her class a lot. She was very approachable when I had questions about the material. I would definitely take another class by her but she doesnt teach higher level stats!

5.0
4.0
STAT213
Apr 19, 2007

Clear & Concise, good prof, if your struggling go to the tutorial or go to her in person and she will explain it to you. Make sure you do your homework, cause this course may seem easy but you need to get it ingrained in your brain to pass the quizes.

5.0
2.0
STAT217
Aug 23, 2007

You don't need a text for this class. The quizzes are fairly easy and straight forward following the examples from the class, but memorizing the flowchart and formulas kind of sucks. Watch out for the midterm and final since they deal with more theory than application which is a lot different than the quizzes. Know how to manipulate the formulas.

2.0
4.0
STAT217
Nov 11, 2007

Messy, unorganized and incomplete notes. She spends more time doing examples on the board than explaining that the hell you are supposed to be doing to solve the question. Good luck getting help from her during office hours or in the lab while she sits on her ass and doesnt offer help. Her tests don't even reflect the labs or assignments she gives.

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 7, 2007

Unless your a complete statistics genius, avoid getting this professor at all costs. I have never worked so hard in a class just to stay above class average. Her quizzes should be studied for as if they are midterms since they are so difficult and don't cover questions that she went over in class.

3.0
4.0
STAT217
Dec 8, 2007

Ive never worked so hard in a class before and i still barley passed. Her notes are incomplete, messy and because your frantically writing down her notes from the overhead you dont have time to try to understand the concepts shes talking about. Until you get home that is, and you teach yourself what she was saying. Quizzes are also hard.

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 9, 2007

Quiz 1 class average - 52%, Midterm average - 45%, Quiz 5 class average - 53%.... Need I say more?!.. ok i will.. worst prof EVERRRR

3.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 13, 2007

Very nice prof, pretty helpful, and a very fair marker. The subject matter isn't really that difficult HOWEVER, lectures consisted of her going through examples at the speed of light, and I was racing just to copy the notes down let alone understand what was being said.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 14, 2007

never done so bad in a class in my life. I was taking 5 courses , had A's in all 4 and had to finally drop this class because I couldn't risk it dropping my GPA. Like the people below me said (we're all probably in the same class), 1st quiz - 53%, Midterm 6/15 .. overall, her quiz/midterms DONTmatch notes. TOO MANY EXAMPLES! TOO FAST. Doesn't EXPLA

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 19, 2007

Same as below: Way too fast, does not explain, too much material. Lectures too long, no explanation, just regurgitation. Quizzes are extremely difficult - very different from other material. Final exam was very difficult, and LONG - about 1-1.5 hours too long! I don't even know if I will pass, and I have 3.8gpa on 3 other classes so far this sem!!!

5.0
3.0
STAT217
Jan 17, 2008

BEST Stats teacher EVER! extremely clear! her notes are amazing ! Quizzes and exams are fair. Do the assignment questions and you will do well. She is VERY helpful.. also gives you a chance to earn bonus marks by doing webwork questions. Overall the BEST TEACHER I HAVE HAD ! Take this class with her !

4.0
5.0
STAT217
Jan 19, 2008

compared to other STAT profs I've had, she was the best. She had great notes. Quizzes and exams were fair, just as long as you do your work.

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Mar 10, 2008

She is the worst teacher I have ever had for stats. Just brutal. Only take her class if you want to fail! The class averages are extremely low, and going to class seems pointless as she doesn't explain anything. She just goes through as many examples as possible. Avoid her at all cost. You don't get a formula sheet or cheat sheet for the exam

2.0
5.0
STATS217
Mar 18, 2008

Just awful!!!!! Don't take a class with her unless you wannna fail!!! I have never had such a bad instructor! My GPA was 4.00... until I took this course (unfortunatelly!!). Now I'm just hoping I'll pass it... Class average for the midterm is 43%...

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Apr 7, 2008

I have never in my life worked so hard just to get a stupid B in the class. I'm in accounting right now (which is supposed to be really hard) and I guarantee I worked harder in Stats and still didn't even do well. I don't know what the university is thinking keeping her around. Somebody should definitly write a complaint...

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Apr 26, 2008

VERY HARD COURSE. Never ever in my life have I had to work so hard to even hope to pass the class. Midterm average was around 40%, Final exam was EXTREMELY HARD. Had a B+ in stat 213 with Stallard (who is your best bet for stats). Assignments have nothing to do with quizzes/exams. Avoid this class at all costs.

2.0
5.0
STAT213
Jun 30, 2008

DROP THE CLASS if u want a decent GPA. assignments are difficult, quizzes are worse, and exams are damn near impossible. her lectures are like having a nagging high-pitched monkey in ur ear. Doesn't explain things, just gives stupid examples. she gives u a 5% bonus for webwork, but it won't matter after her brutal exams. totally ruined stats for me

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Jul 3, 2008

Do not take class with Nancy if you want to keep your sanity and a decent GPA. Incredibly hard quizzes, midterm and final. She assumes that the class understands the material as well as she does, and makes her tests difficult accordingly. There are much better stats teachers out there. AVOID.

4.0
3.0
STATS213
Jul 7, 2008

Nancy for stats 213 was a good teacher. She definatly has tougher quizzes, but all content is clearly covered in class. She always gives easy, medium and hard examples. I recommend her or Stallard. Both good professors.

3.0
3.0
STATS217
Aug 8, 2008

No Comments

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Sep 13, 2008

AVOID AT ALL COSTS! Notes are all over the place, quizzes are impossible, midterm is a hard kick in the groin. I did all practise questions and went to her for help and still barely passed her tests. The only thing that got me through this class was the fact that the grades were curved. Get out while you can...

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Sep 26, 2008

NEVER take stats with this prof, the quizzes are unreasonable, unfair and extremely hard. She's "resdesigning" the course so everything is a mess and she is very unorganized. She makes MANY mistakes in class with the examples that she gives us and the students always correct her. You can't even use a formula sheet for midterms or finals.

1.0
5.0
STAT215
Dec 15, 2008

Her class is RIDICULOUS. Her midterm and final are both impossible, and she goes by everything so quickly in class. On the flip side, she is fairly approachable outside of class. Even after a STAT review class and so many review tests, her tests were still ridiculous! Don't take Stats with her!

3.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 19, 2008

Midterm and Final are impossible unless you are a cyborg. Other then that, assignments and quizzes are easy. You can do well in this class by learning the material before you go into the lectures. If you want a challenging course this is the one.

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 20, 2008

Don't take this course with her.she does not explain anything.she just stands up in front of her stupid powerpoint slides and read them.Her slides are stupid and childish.Quizes, midterm,and final are hard.I expect the worse from her.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Dec 29, 2008

Horrible prof who obviously does not care that this is a mandatory course for all her students, and needs to learn how to teach. There is a problem when more than half the class fails the midterm!And it's just a first year course too!

5.0
4.0
STAT217
Jan 2, 2009

Going into this class I had heard a lot of negative reports about Nancy but I actually found her to be a good prof. If you paid attention and take down all the example done in class, Webworks and Quizzes are no problem. The midterm and finals are tough becuase it covers a lot of true and false theory questions. Didnt buy the textbook for this cla

5.0
3.0
STAT213
Jan 17, 2009

Good prof.Very approachable, will explain anything to you and even give more marks on quizzes if you can make a good argument for it.But Double Check your quizzes/tests, often makes mistakes marking. Don't need the text book at all.Notes on blackboard.Midterm and Final aren't EASY but pretty fair.

1.0
5.0
STAT213
Jan 22, 2009

DO NOT TAKE STAT 213 OR 217 WITH HER.YOU WILL REGRET.She is Not the perfect teacher.I failed the course.quizzes,midterms,and final are impossible to solve .

1.0
5.0
STAT213
Jan 22, 2009

AVOID taking this course with her.This is my advice for you.

5.0
2.0
STATS213
Feb 26, 2009

Nancy is an awesome prof. Despite what everyone else says I think that she gives you all the resources to ace her quizzes, tests and final. She's so approachable and she answers questions via e-mail very promptly. One of the best profs I've ever had.

2.0
4.0
STAT213
May 5, 2009

awful prof who doesn't care about how her students perform. i've never heard another prof say that a C- class average is "really good", especially for an intro level course. retard!

2.0
4.0
STATS213
Oct 30, 2009

Awful, awful prof. I wanted to yell at her after every class because she frustrated me so much. Don't take this class. She is retarded and speaks way too quickly.

1.0
5.0
STATS211
Nov 30, 2009

HORRIBLE!!!! Why is she still teaching?? Im disgusted

2.0
4.0
STATS217
Feb 15, 2010

the comment box wont give me enough words for my complaits for her. Terrible teacher, not helpful at all. speaks at speed of light (as if shes is sick of going through the material for the billionth time). bad teaching style. Probably the worst stats prof i have had so far.

2.0
5.0
STAT213
Apr 18, 2010

Worst instructor ever in the stat department!!! Avoid at all cost!!!! Her midterm and final are impossible! She does not care at all about teaching (when you write quiz or the midterm she would watch movie on her mac) talks down to students when we request to slow down take her at your own risk and be ready to be owned

1.0
5.0
STATS217
Apr 24, 2010

worse prof i have had in my 3 years of uni experience. cant teach, wont teach. aviods your question. and nothing makes sense. i dont understand how she is qualified to teach here? course evaluation is no where to be found. i wonder whyyyyyy?

5.0
5.0
STAT217
Apr 25, 2010

You people are all such drama queens, Nancy is not NEARLY as bad as some of these comments say. Trust me, Nosal and Stallard are NO better.. In fact I much prefer Nancy to them. Sure the course itself is extremely hard, but shes NOT that bad as a professor. WebWork sucks, but it forces you to practice. Don't freak out about her, theres much worse.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Apr 27, 2010

Don't Defend HER she is sooooo bad. I will use an example to illustrate her teaching abilities. One day Nancy is teaching and looks up at the clock (for the millionth time) and notices she has too much material left to cover so she rushes to finish and loses everyone. Half the time her examples have numerous errors The End

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Jul 6, 2010

won't lie...i don't like stats to begin with. but make your life easier and choose a different prof for 217. her notes are lovely, but her explanations are a bit confusing. no textbook, which is nice....but her midterm and final are much harder than any material covered in lectures. too long, beyond an intro stats class...

4.0
3.0
STAT217
Aug 18, 2010

I actually thought that she was pretty good... Her notes were great, and as long as you went to class with them it was easy to follow. The midterm and final were from our exact notes... So if you used them, and went to class it wasn't too hard. She was very approachable through email too, I got responses that were thorough and swift.

5.0
3.0
STAT213
Oct 16, 2010

She's fantastic. She's very clear and obviously puts effort into teaching rather than just reading from a textbook.

4.0
3.0
STAT211
Oct 28, 2010

You can tell she has a genuine passion and interest for what she's teaching, but sometimes she rushes through certain concepts that she finds easy, while our class is kind of left in the dust. She also very rarely ends class on time.

1.0
5.0
STATS217
Nov 14, 2010

terrible prof. assigns online homeowrk. taking her class will screw over your gpa. take this class with somebody else.goes through concepts really quick. if you want to waste a half a grand , take her as a prof.

2.0
5.0
STAT213
Dec 7, 2010

Horrible Prof. Choose any prof but her. Constantly (4+ times per class) making errors and students have to correct her. Help during office hours? Forget it - she acts as if you are inconveniencing her, less than helpful. Quiz's/Midterm/Final never corresponds with questions in class. Always the most difficult questions. Overall worst I've ever had

2.0
5.0
STAT211
Dec 16, 2010

Horrible. Constantly flying through concepts and making errors in notes that students have to correct. Never ends class on time. Spoke all semester about how final exam is non-cumulative and changed it to cumulative at the last minute. Have to pass the final to pass the class, unfair. Lots of unnessesary stress, pick any other prof.

5.0
2.0
STATS213
Dec 18, 2010

She does fly through the material quite fast, but if you require a prof that can give you a little motivation when you need it, she is your person! I would not have made it through the class if it were not for her.

2.0
3.0
STATS211
Jan 27, 2011

Most unorganized teaching strategies, hard to follow, final exam was ridiculously long. If you take stats with her, make sure you have a genius friend who can help you.

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Feb 1, 2011

Chibry speaks legible english, which seems to be somewhat of a phenomenon in the stats department. She also posts notes online, which when printed are really neat and tidy. however, if you're a student who needs personalized help i would not reccomend her. if you can figure out some things on your own, you will zoom through her class.

1.0
5.0
STAT327
Apr 24, 2011

HORRIBLE. Worst class I've ever taken in university. She should not be teaching. She's all around just stupid and selfish. Don't bother wasting your money taking her class.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
May 4, 2011

Just an absolute joke. Although she speaks english fine, she cannot teach or relate the material nor does she attempt to make the class interesting. She must be getting a cut of the money because she requires you to fork over $200 with a textbook(mandatory), software and clicker. Of course there are ways around this but she must be getting a cut.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
May 4, 2011

Her quizzes are ridiculous and considerably tougher then the midterm. Not to mention the midterm and quiz material do not relate at all. You have to do twice the practice questions, ones for with minitab(for the quizzes) and others for the midterm which is heavily based on theory....All around she is just a garbage professor. She needs to get axed.

3.0
5.0
STAT327
May 5, 2011

Horrible prof. Went to her office hours twice, had to wait an hour and a half to get to talk to her. The day before the final she was chatting with a student about the weather and about diseases while others were waiting outside.When she does help, she just throws formulas at you instead of explaining it properly. Waste of money

2.0
3.0
STAT211
May 25, 2011

Made a LOT of mistakes in class-- to the point where people started moaning every time she said 'oopsies'. Should organize her office hours better. Also, the final was WAY too long, it was the only test I have ever written that I didn't get a chance to look over my answers. But somehow I did ok, you need to be a math-oriented person to do well

4.0
4.0
STAT217
Jun 9, 2011

Overall a bad teaching experience with her. She made her tests way too hard and her TA's marked them like they were trying to take off marks. She is quite disorganized as a teacher but still does an okay job of teaching the material. The Wiley Plus assignments were painfully long for only 8% of your mark. Textbook was a complete waste of money.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Jun 29, 2011

I failed stats the first time around with Chibry. Took it again with Dandong Feng and it was so much more clear and understandable. Having taken it twice, I can honestly tell you it makes a HUGE DIFFERENCE taking a prof like Feng over a prof like Chibry. The way she teaches the course is so much more complicated then it needs to be. Warning you.

2.0
5.0
STATS213
Jul 13, 2011

Shes horrible. On one quiz she gave us the average was 8/20 and she said in a laughing manner "for all those who got 10 and 14 good job because some of the problems I had to look in the solution manual" she does give clear notes but the problems on the quiz are unlike the examples used in class so there useless.

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Nov 21, 2011

She makes things a lot more complicated than they need to be in lecture. I found that reading the textbook was easier to understand. However, if you read the textbook, do the assignments, and go to class (fairly time consuming overall), you`ll most likely get a fair grade.

3.0
4.0
STATS213
Nov 30, 2011

She is okay at explaining, but what she teaches is not what the assignments, quizzes and midterm are on.

3.0
5.0
STAT213
Dec 6, 2011

Really nice, class is pretty interesting and goes by fast, especially on "Youtube Fridays." But the online assignments and quizzes are near impossible. Notes are online, and she teaches from the notes, so attendance isn't totally mandatory. Wouldn't recommend just due to the frustration online assignments and quizzes caused.

4.0
2.0
STAT211
Dec 7, 2011

Straightforward notes - attendance not necessary but would recommend, mainly for clicker. She tends to spend the first 15 minutes going over things from previously class. I have yet to crack the textbook...and I got 100% on the midterm, and have got at least 75% on all the quizzes except one I bombed when I was sick, but it's best 3/4!

3.0
3.0
STATS213
Dec 28, 2011

Pretty good at teaching, uses a lot of examples. Toughest section is probability, she teaches it about 4-5 different ways. Expects you to analyze and interpret stats and meanings. Follow her notes and be able to do her examples. Quiz questions are from notes. Online assignments are long, start a week or a few days before.

5.0
3.0
STAT213
Jan 12, 2012

Great prof to get the basic of stats down. Quizzes are fair, and she is very approachable in office hours. She's extremely funny and Youtube Fridays were always the highlight of my week. BEWARE of the online Wiley assignments - they are about 50x harder than the quizzes and take hours but are only worth a small percent.

5.0
4.0
STAT211
May 1, 2012

She was a great prof. Her lectures were very helpful, so many examples to help example a topic. Her quizzes were fair, but the final exam is extremely hard, compared to everything else she teaches.

4.0
3.0
STAT213
May 14, 2012

Good prof especially compared to the others that teach this class (few of them speak english) class notes are very helpful, and so are the online assignments. if you go over the class notes each day you should be fine.

5.0
3.0
STATS217
May 28, 2012

Great prof, not the easiest of the stats profs but she does a really good job of teaching you the theory instead of just specific problems. She likes fill in the blanks and T/F questions on her exams, also big on clicker questions. If you want to build a strong statistics background, take class with her.

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Jul 2, 2012

She is the worst teacher I have ever had. Her mid term and final exams are all different from home work

2.0
3.0
STAT213
Oct 18, 2012

Terrible professor. Just reads off powerpoint slides. Examples in class are super simple, too simple - then the quizzes and texts are much, much more difficult. Homework covers concepts before she does, don't know why I should show up to class. She also uses the computer too much, we need to learn concepts, can we use a computer for the final?

3.0
4.0
STATS213
Nov 21, 2012

Brutal prof. Uses minitab for all her quizzes, and people with macs cant practise before hand. Does the easiest eamples in class, which dont prepare you for the homework, quizzes, or exams. Avoid her, she is a waste of money and time.

4.0
4.0
STAT213
Nov 24, 2012

I found Nancy extremely helpful after class or during office hours. She really wants you to succeed. Her lectures are confusing and found I had to get external help. however, she cares and tries her best to make sure you do well.

3.0
5.0
STAT213
Nov 26, 2012

super nice, teaches well, helps you when needed, BUT her tests are ridiculously unfair. They are nothing like the homework assigned, class examples, and it's quite frustrating. I studied for hours on end, went over everything, all class ex. even read the text even though we havent touched upon the book, and it couldnt prepare me for the exam.

4.0
4.0
STAT213
Nov 29, 2012

She is a really good teacher, her midterms are very hard but the this is because she wants you to ace the final which is easier. She wants you to do well and if you make it to the end you will.

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 14, 2012

She is a very nice teacher and willing to help. Always pay attention in class because you can fall behind easily. Finals was easier than midterms. Did not open the text book once, DONT BUY IT!!! If she saw me writing this, she would tell me to do it on MiniTab...

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 27, 2012

Nancy is a very nice person, and her classes aren't boring, but she is very tricky. Her notes in class make it seem like you know everything, but the quizzes, midterms and finals are sooo hard.

2.0
5.0
STAT217
Jan 21, 2013

Talks too fast, skips over important concepts. Tries to act tough by giving extremly hard everything....also by having everything quizzes, tests, assignments, 2 midterms and a final. Poor teaching skills...more like she wants to just get stuff over with.

3.0
4.0
STAT217
Feb 2, 2013

Very poor teaching skills. Doesn't go over important concepts at all. Seems as though her aim is to ruin your life in Stats. I don't understand why her quizes, exams, etc. are so hard, the point is to help us learn, not make us memorize stuff.

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Apr 9, 2013

Did not find her lessons useful at all, refused to answer questions. She read right off the PDF notes. I found that I was better off on my own. Her tests are unlike the homework. Finally she focus' on Minitab yet Midterm and Final is written. NOT COOL. Especially since the two are worth +50% of your mark. I wouldn't recommend to anyone. 1/10

4.0
4.0
STAT217
Apr 11, 2013

Sometimes doesn't explain well. Is a tough course though.

4.0
4.0
STAT217
Apr 27, 2013

I thought she was a good prof. But she challenges you so you need to work hard. Her exams are hard but are possible if you take the time to learn the material. If you need a stronger background in stats shes great. If not maybe take someone easier... but she does write the common final so it may be useful to become familiar with her exam style.

1.0
5.0
STAT217
May 8, 2013

Seems to me that she doesn't like critical criticism. I noticed she never gave us an evaluation sheet (yellow) for herself in which we can comment on her strengths/weaknesses. She seems to ignore any criticism we give her, and she likes to just make your life hard.I never recommend her, she doesn't even bump up marks if the avg is low. Bad Prf

1.0
5.0
STAT217
May 8, 2013

Seems to me that she doesn't like critical criticism. I noticed she never gave us an evaluation sheet (yellow) for herself in which we can comment on her strengths/weaknesses. She seems to ignore any suggestions we give her, and she likes to just make your life hard.I never recommend her, she doesn't even bump up marks if the avg is low. Bad Prf!

3.0
5.0
STAT217
May 22, 2013

She is a very nice prof who has the best intentions, but she really skims over important concepts. DO NOT buy the textbook. Never used it once and her questions are nothing like those found in there. Her quizzes, homework, midterms, and final are very difficult and a ton of work so don't take this course with her if you plan on slacking.

4.0
4.0
STAT213
Jun 22, 2013

Nice lady, but lectures are totally different from the quiz material in the labs. Tough Midterm and Final. Learn Minitab. You have been warned.

1.0
5.0
STAT217
Jun 28, 2013

Thinks best approach is to learn by yourself. Went to her office hours. Received no help and was told to go home and try work through the problems again. Not much help. Pretty sure she is endorsed by Minitab too. If you have a Mac, you can't learn to use minitab at home and get screwed over on all the quizzes. Overall just stay away.

4.0
2.0
STAT213
Jul 10, 2013

She is a good instructor, exams were fair.

5.0
2.0
STAT213
Jul 12, 2013

She was very clear and a super approachable prof. If you go to class and pay attention with your printed out notes and add your own notes to those, this class can be easy!

3.0
3.0
STAT217
Aug 3, 2013

Not a terrible prof, but far from a good one. She seems good enough of a person (which can’t be said of all bad profs), but has a hard time teaching concepts. Work was fair, but I ended up learning more from MyStatLab than from lectures. Did bad based on that. She is good enough of a math person, but maybe in something other than lecturing.

5.0
3.0
STAT213217
Grade: B+
Sep 10, 2013

Not an easy course but she is a great prof. She really wants to help you learn. Her notes are great. Midterms are hard but manageable and made the final seem easier. Study hard though and do her practise tests, they are life savers. Go to class. You can do well without doing well on quizzes so try to learn mini tab but you don't have to be a pro.

3.0
3.0
STAT213
Sep 12, 2013

I was scared to have her as a prof but she was honestly not that bad. The midterms were brutal however the final was much easier in comparison. Minitab was expensive but extremely helpful. Overall, Chibry was okay, although she insisted on group work where the class had to survey others in order to show basic theories = time wasted.

5.0
4.0
STAT213
Nov 29, 2013

She is great! I was really struggling with the material and she was really helpful during office hours.

5.0
4.0
MATH321
Nov 29, 2013

Her notes are really good but you also have to do questions from the text. Her explanations were so much better and shorter than the text. I was not looking forward to taking stats but she made it really interesting. Great sense of humor and she really cares about students succeeding.

5.0
4.0
STAT213
Nov 29, 2013

Awesome! Made stats interesting which I think is very hard to do.

1.0
4.0
STATS205
Dec 3, 2013

Awful. Just awful. Gets defensive when you ask too in-depth of a question. Doesn't spend enough time showing you how to actually do the math by hand, always uses minitab or statcrunch and it screws you over for the midterms/final. The online homework assignments are great though.

5.0
4.0
STATS205
Dec 4, 2013

Dr. Chibry is just awesome!

1.0
5.0
MATH321
Dec 9, 2013

She's nice, but she cannot teach. She does not like to explain questions in detail, and leaves you hanging. Quite lazy when it comes to answering emails, and tries to avoid appointments at all costs. Made an appointment and she apparently "forgot".

1.0
4.0
MATH321
Dec 14, 2013

Cannot teach. She is reluctant to finish questions, let's you figure them out for homework. Will blatantly lie to your face, claims she has office hours, she doesn't show up or cancels them. Then tells you she was there. I would avoid her at all costs. Made an interesting course difficult and horrible to attend.

1.0
3.0
MATH321
Dec 15, 2013

Horrible professor. Doesn't know how to teach the material because she doesn't seem to understand it herself. Goes over the easy concepts in class then makes you go over the more difficult topics yourself. Quick marker tho.

2.0
4.0
MATH321
Dec 16, 2013

Graded the exams quickly but took marks off for ridiculous things. She consistently skipped out of her own office hours, doesnt seem open to students opinions at all, and made us learn the most difficult concepts on our own

1.0
5.0
STAT205
Dec 19, 2013

The teacher is nice and tries her best to make the class less boring. But her concepts are very hard to understand, the textbook was very pricey and not used at all. She is not present during office hours and seems angry/impatient when there are students asking for help. This teacher is more of a "do-it-yourself" type. Not recommended.

1.0
4.0
STAT2O5
Jan 2, 2014

Horrible teacher. She was all over the place during class. Midterms were relatively easy. Final was difficult , had to understand questions on long answer. Lab were not organized and TA was not helpful as they were confused with her instruction. One of the least helpful teachers I have had so far.

2.0
4.0
STATS205
Feb 1, 2014

Horrible Teacher!!! Does not take any interest in the course and never gives you any good examples. The lectures are boring and irrelevant to anything, if you ask her a question she is NOT willing to help! Final and Midterm were both brutal and textbook doesn't help either! WOULD NOT RECOMMEND!!

1.0
5.0
STAT205
Feb 12, 2014

I find her lectures and homework very confusing, as most of them are not related at all. The textbook was barely ever used and the subject itself could have been easy if she was willing to go the extra mile to help students. There is too much bulk in her homework. Objectively, I would seriously avoid this instructor if you need a high GPA.

2.0
4.0
STATS213
Feb 15, 2014

Awful teacher she goes over examples incredibly fast and gives example questions yet gives no answers so you don't know if you're getting it. Claims labs aren't mandatory yet tests on information that was only learned from the labs. Wastes a lot of class time and is all over the map. Does not explain hard concepts well. Avoid her!

1.0
5.0
STAT213
Mar 11, 2014

Horrible! I have never had such a rude and incompetent prof. She does not care about her students and has no idea how to teach. Do NOT take a class with her. you will regret it.

5.0
3.0
STAT205
Mar 11, 2014

I think she is a great prof! She is extremely helpful. I went to her office many times for help. There were only a few questions that she didn't give the complete answers to because she wanted us to do it on our own in class or outside of class.

5.0
3.0
MATH321
Mar 11, 2014

She was so helpful during her office hours. She did make us learn some concepts on our own but she is so much better than the prof I have now. I'll be lucky if I get a C- in this next course.

1.0
2.0
MATH321
Apr 18, 2014

The primary issue with Ms. Chibry is that she does not understand the material. During the ~3 month duration of the semester she attempted ~ 20 derivations, was able to complete 4 during class time. This was an introductory probability theory course. Excels at 'plugging in stuff' in the formulas, though.

5.0
2.0
STAT213
May 10, 2014

Excellent prof, very helpful, stats is tough so you need to put a lot of effort. Make sure you get minicab (learn that program), and always attend labs.

5.0
2.0
STATS213
Grade: A+
Jun 2, 2014

Amazing professor, I am a very slow learner but with her teaching I understand everything fully and was able to receive a very good mark. You must attend every lecture and her midterms were fairly easy for me as well as the final was fair. She made the lecture very interesting although she may be a bit fast at times.

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Jun 27, 2014

I would say that she is the best stats 213 prof you could get! She has a key understanding of the material, her expectations are clearly set and she wants her students to do well. Midterms were easy and final was fair. Has a good personality as well, would watch world cup games with us but overall great Stats prof, you won't find a better one

1.0
5.0
STAT213
Nov 25, 2014

Never ever take again. She mixes up everything! Maybe you can understand the material by reading the class note but when you listen to her lectures, you'll lose, forever. Avoid.

4.0
3.0
STAT217
Grade: B+
Dec 3, 2014

Great prof! The material can be tough but she tries to help students out as much as she can! She wants her students to be well and she's pretty understanding. Would definitely recommend!

5.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 5, 2014

She's an amazing teacher who truly cares about her students.

3.0
3.0
213
Dec 6, 2014

Nancy Chibry is a good prof for Statistics. She knows what she is talking about and her notes are very informative and clear. She is also kind and caring and took interest in her students doing well. Overall Stat 213 was a fantastic experience with her!

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 6, 2014

Lecture layout was very well done, gives a thorough example and ones that you have to be in class to fill it out but she taught very precise and she's very knowledgable. Played songs in the beginning of class, she was also funny too.

5.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 15, 2014

I have had her as my prof for my first year of university, I thought she was very professional and kind, I enjoyed her lectures as the time seemed to fly by, keeps you interested in class with fun "top hat" questions, as long as you have a friend to compete or work with on these in-class questions, you'll enjoy yourself as much as I did.

5.0
3.0
213
Dec 17, 2014

Not sure where her bad reviews came from but whatever it was she changed. She is a very good prof, was clear about the material and explained it rather well. I have no complaints about her other then the tests formed seemed to be a bit too long for the allotted time. But other then that fair, I would recommend this prof for sure.

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 18, 2014

STAT 213 has lots crammed into it, making it difficult for profs to adequately cover and explain everything, so be prepared to study. That said, she tried her best to explain as much as she could. Loves to help - you just may need to seek her out. Lots of participation exercises. Read the notes she posts before lectures; they're the essential text!

5.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 22, 2014

She's actually a good prof. Stats is difficult in general but, she explains things fairly clearly. She is very helpful if you go to office hours. Doing practice questions is key to pass this course and attending labs.

4.0
3.0
213
Jan 4, 2015

She's very nice and does everything to help her students.

1.0
5.0
STATS217
Jan 12, 2015

These days people like to sugar coat stuff so much, that even this website lacks a tag that says something critical. Maybe like "poor teaching skills" or "bad prof, not interested in the subject herself" or "monotone and irrelevant". Even if you combine all the poor ratings below, it's not enough. I ended up with a goof grade, but she was really...

5.0
3.0
STAT217
Grade: B+
Apr 14, 2015

An A is achievable but expect to actually study and attend lectures + labs. Chibry cares about students' grades so she marks very nice. Provides extra credit and a lot of practice examsquestions. There may be bad ratings for her but remember that she teaches first years and they are used to getting babied.

4.0
3.0
STAT217
Apr 24, 2015

Nancy is very accessible and encourages students to speak to her both after class and during office hours. Nice marker. The downside is she teaches you how to do everything on the computer and skims through the manual parts, so you're on your own for the final.

3.0
3.0
STATS217
Grade: B
May 1, 2015

2 midterms, 10 assignments, 1 minitab exam and a final exam. First midterm is difficult. Second midterm is EASY. Final exam so-so. Chibry ALWAYS posts up review questions--DO THEM. The assignments are long and monotonous Chibry's lectures are boring and she goes fast, but she teaches the material well. Notes don't come filled so DON'T SKIP

3.0
4.0
STAT217
Grade: B-
May 1, 2015

Out of all the professors in the stats department, Chibry is easily your best bet. She explains stuff fairly well, but you have to show up for class. Be prepared for lots of homework, and the test will wreck you if you are not prepared. The final was designed to fail students, but I suppose it is not her decision.

5.0
1.0
STATS213
Jun 4, 2015

I'm surprised her rating isn't higher! Chibry is great. Although lectures were long, her examples were interesting, and we did lots of practice questions in class. You can tell that she really cares about her students. She's always poking into the labs to make sure everything is ok, and she is always willing to answer questions.

1.0
5.0
STATS217
Jun 6, 2015

AVOID!

4.0
1.0
STAT213
Grade: A
Jun 26, 2015

cool

5.0
2.0
STAT217
Grade: A-
Sep 8, 2015

She was one of the best professors I ever had. Her lectures were clear and understandable. There is a lot of material in this class so be prepared. The course isn't difficult at all if you go over her notes. All the exams were easy. I took the course in the spring term and it was an Easy A :)

5.0
2.0
STATS213
Grade: A-
Nov 8, 2015

I had Nancy in the spring I was one of her class representatives. Occasionally I had a few issues, but Nancy is one of the better professors in the department. The TA's were my textbook, they were phenomenal. And there is a full hour of extra help in tutorials. Don't be deterred from Nancy, course is little hard but in all actuality she's fine.

4.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 6, 2015

This was a class that is hard IF you don't put the effort into doing labs, assignments or attending lectures. I found the professor to be very helpful and clearly tries to break down concepts that past students had trouble with. She is a very fair prof and would highly recommend her. Also, don't buy the textbook she uses an online one.

3.0
3.0
STAT213
Dec 7, 2015

Nancy is great, she is helpful and has decent notes. She has too many top hat questions and most of them are asked before we know how to solve that type of questions. Her pace varies from extremely fast to slow. Her tests are fair but are worded differently than her homework so you get confused. She is fair and I will take her again.

2.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 10, 2015

Super confusing and jumps all over the place. Teaches you everything on minitab... which you can't even use for the final.

2.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 14, 2015

Helpful during lectures, but uses Minitab for everything A lot of homework is assigned every week, found lectures to be confusing and learned alot of content on my own time

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Dec 15, 2015

stresses technology is important and key uses mintiab for everything , ironically cant be used for final , shes very helpful during lectures and her ta lin is very helpful. Good thing shes good looking or id skip class, her and her ta lin are the hottest ta prof combo on campus

2.0
4.0
STAT213
Grade: B
Dec 17, 2015

Spent more lecture time talking about all of the websites and technology required for the course than she did actually teaching. I ended up skipping most of the lectures because we would spend the entire time submitting our answers online and going over them. Class time was not productive at all, so textbook usage is mandatory. Would not recommend.

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Grade: B
Jan 7, 2016

- She really wants her students to excel in the course - Gives you opportunities to improve (labs, tophat) - Tests are kind of hard: make sure you do the lab practice questions and the extra practice tests she provides!! - Lab test was brutal... the lab test I got had 16 questions but each question had like 3-6 sub-questions (a,b,c,d,...)

3.0
4.0
STAT213
Grade: B
Jan 8, 2016

Nancy herself is a very kind person, though with hundreds of other students it gets a little tough. Lectures are long and notes are good, but she doesn't really go over the finer details so you either have to study hard to get help from a friend. Tests are hard, and expect to feel frustrated almost the entire time.

5.0
2.0
STAT213
Jan 9, 2016

Nancy is very dedicated and compassionate towards the work she does. She wants her students to do the best they can. She's there to always help and will do little things that help all students improve their grades. Really amazing prof, highly recommend her!

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Grade: B+
Jan 9, 2016

Nancy does her best to explain the material, but the course itself can be quite challenging. The final exam is very hard and you'll have to study hard for it.

4.0
4.0
STAT213
Grade: B
Jan 11, 2016

Nancy worked extremely hard for her students. I applaud her efforts and hope my 217 prof will be similar. Midterms were fair but still required hours of studying and reviewing practice questions. I did feel the final exam was much tougher than the midterms. The final did leave a bitter taste in my mouth but I cannot complain about my own shortcomin

5.0
2.0
STAT213
Grade: B+
Feb 3, 2016

Easy A if you put in even slight effort. Which I didn't....

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Grade: B+
Apr 15, 2016

She does activities to engage the class and this helps in a class of 300+. She takes into consideration test material based on what is covered in class. As well, she comes to watch when people take the midterm and based on that and marks she will sometimes curve the test.

5.0
3.0
STAT213
Grade: A-
May 4, 2016

Dr. Chibry is a very clear lecturer. Her examples are easy to understand and help you become accustomed to statistics. She is there to help students after class and during office hours. Chibry's midterms and lab test are pretty easy however the final is much harder as it is written by other professors. Homework is relatively easy but repetitive.

4.0
3.0
STAT213
Grade: A-
Aug 24, 2016
Would take again

Nancy is the best prof you can get for Stats 213. She's really high up in the department so she knows whats up. She is really reasonable and curves marks when she should. You can boost your mark a lot by going to all the labs, doing tophat and doing the post-exam quizzes so make sure you do!!

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
1.0
4.0
STAT321
Nov 21, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Nancy is hands down the worst prof I've had at u of c. She claims to have interest in her students doing well, but is extremely unreachable outside of class and she seems to never have time to actually help her students. If you have the chance to take this class with someone else, i highly recommend it. She ran out of time to even finish the course

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
1.0
4.0
STAT321
Grade: A-
Dec 2, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Doesn't actually teach during class and was behind schedule after first week. kept spending too long on examples and never had time for proofs, kept posting videos made by a different prof online as proofs and they were very poor quality.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
STAT321
Grade: A
Dec 18, 2016
Wouldn't take again

It always seemed that Nancy was rushed and she did not seem to know where the class was at even though students were failing her exams left and right. She was hard to reach outside of class and did not even attend the final exam. The number of tophat questions was ridiculous and the final was beyond this world. Avoid this class unless it's required

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
1.0
5.0
STAT321
Dec 19, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Easily the hardest class you will take in University so it doesn't really help which professor you take it with. Nancy was always behind in class and a bid reason for that was the endless amount of tophat questions she would use during lectures. The final IS SO INSANE that someone collapsed in the middle of it and people were crying after.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
TEST HEAVY
1.0
5.0
STAT321
Dec 20, 2016
Wouldn't take again

When we fell behind in the first week, she had no urgency in catching up and spent too much time on top hat questions. I studied hard and went into the final with an A, but the final was IMPOSSIBLE! No amount of studying could have prepared anybody for that exam. It tested your reading comprehension skills rather than your STATS skills. Stay away!

1.0
5.0
STATS321
Grade: D
Dec 23, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Hands down one of the most horrible professors at U of C. She claims that she cares for her students but she doesn't at all. Shows up late for her office hours or sometimes she is not there at all. She also doesn't go into depth but briefly summarizes on what we should know. Take this Robison or Stallard. At least they go into depth

5.0
4.0
STAT321
Grade: A-
Jan 12, 2017
Would take again

STATS 321 is known to be the toughest Stats course in the department. So, it's no surprise that most students found it difficult. But Nancy is one of the most caring profs. She offers extra marks through TopHat, provides the notes to print and bring to class (answers are filled during class), posts videos of qs that can't be solved in class,etc.

Participation matters
Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
5.0
STAT321
Grade: A-
Jan 12, 2017
Would take again

Nnacy didn't write the final but her quizzes are fair comapred to the other sections. You have to watch all the videos she posts if you want to get a good mark and havent bought the book. She really wants her class to do well so she tries to bring up marks as much as she can. The class is really tough but shes one of the best profs for stats

Tough Grader
Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
STAT217
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 20, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Annoying, and has huge mood swings.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
3.0
STAT217
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Tries to be funny but really just annoys the whole class.

Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
5.0
STAT321
Grade: B+
Jan 24, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Chibry really doesn't seem to care. She gives easy examples as notes that pale in comparison to quizzes and exams and assigns videos of concepts when she runs out of time to cover them. She was also conveniently away for the week of the exam... I suggest avoiding her for this difficult course.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
3.0
STAT321
Feb 24, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She is not good at explaining things and not very competent in general.

2.0
4.0
STAT217
Mar 10, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Constantly makes mistakes when going through examples in her notes which just confuses you more. Moves too quickly through notes and spends too long on TopHat questions. Never seems to be able to figure out how to center her notes on screen so your notes are always cut off. Generally very irritating. Always needs correction from her students.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
4.0
STAT217
Mar 27, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She does not cover anything in lectures. She only does Tophat questions on stuff she has not taught yet and expects you to know what shes doing. She is all over the place in her teaching and makes mistakes all the time. Midterm quizzes had mistakes in them and threw you off because the mistakes contradicted what you knew.

Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
1.0
4.0
STAT217
Apr 14, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Nancy is probably one of the worst professors I've had the misfortune of getting. Her examples are very inconsistent with what you have to do on assignments and exams. She focuses mostly on Tophat questions, some of which we haven't even covered in class, and her pacing is horrendous. We went through 1 section for over 2 weeks because we're behind.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
STAT217
Grade: A
Apr 14, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Nice woman, but not a great lecturer. Can't tell you much else as I was attending Robison's lectures from the second week of classes - on. Moves slowly compared to other prof's and the lectures are pretty dry. Didn't help that it was at 9AM... Very easy course though.

Caring
2.0
4.0
STAT217
May 29, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Worst Stats prof available. Seems to think homework is necessary for things she hasn't taught yet. Inconsistent pacing, where you learn somethings literally the day before an exam. Examples are ridiculously easy compared to what's found on the tests. Teaches how to do everything on the computer instead of by hand. AVOID!

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
5.0
STAT321
Jun 30, 2017
Would take again

Nancy is a good prof, fairly accessible outside class for help and a very friendly lady. She does lag behind the lecture schedule initially so some chapters may get rushed through. She mostly gets you to read the notes before class and then just works on examples during lecture. Tests are fair but looooong so don't waste any time while writing.

Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
STAT205
Apr 4, 2019
Would take again

The sweetest person youll ever meet. Love her!

Respected
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
1.0
5.0
STATS205
Jun 14, 2019
Wouldn't take again

She is always late and irresponsible. When it is her duty to signed off on forms she's always coming up with miscellaneous excuses. One time she even lost my form. I wouldn't trust her with even the most minute things like signing off a form for any administrative purposes, registration deadlines etc.

5.0
2.0
STAT205
Dec 4, 2019
Would take again

One of the best people Ive ever met. 10/10

Respected
5.0
1.0
213
Grade: A+
May 6, 2025
Would take again

thanks for dinner

1.0
1.0
MATH323
Jul 14, 2025

To the person saying you reported her to Dean and were met with retaliation, if Chibry assaulted you, you need to report this to the police. Seems she is messed in the head and don't think this is her first assault.

2.0
3.0
STAT205
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 26, 2025

I feel that a lot of my learning comes from my own efforts and it's difficult to understand her, she teaches in a very brief manner. She'll mention things which will be on quizzes sometimes, which is nice, but overall very unorganized course. The notes are a nightmare and overcomplicated. You can do well if you put in the work to teach yourself.

Lots of homework
1.0
4.0
STAT205
Nov 7, 2025

what she says about how you can go to her for support if you're neurodivergent is purely performative; I have AuDHD and interpreted "association implies causation" to mean association between 2 things implies that a 3rd external thing caused the assoc to occur but she kept saying I was wrong because neither of the associated things caused the other

Tough grader
2.0
4.0
STAT205
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 17, 2025

She is nice, but she glazes over important concepts and has a very unorganized way of teaching. Spends wayyyy too much time on easier concepts and leaves harder concepts for students to figure out. You will have to teach yourself the majority of the tested and difficult content if you take this class with her.

1.0
5.0
STAT205
Nov 18, 2025

Poop in the brain.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
5.0
3.0
STAT205
Grade: B+
Nov 18, 2025
Would take again

She's good at answering questions and adjusts if a quiz goes bad. My class is always needing more time for our assignments and she usually adjusts the due date to help out. Her lectures are pretty helpful since she goes over the concepts multiple times and the TopHat quizzes help with understanding the material being learnt.

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Caring
1.0
5.0
STAT205
Nov 26, 2025

did not know how to teach, only talked about this and that bs.

5.0
3.0
STAT205
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2025
Would take again

I'm not sure why Professor Chibry gets so many bad reviews, sure she goes quickly for some concepts but she often reviews concepts multiple times. She is super lenient on assignment extensions and accessible outside of class. I have never succeeded in math courses, but I went to her office hours at least twice a week, which helped me do well.

Lots of homework
Caring
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
SCIE301
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 4, 2025
Would take again

Nancy was an excellent prof. Although she goes through concepts quickly, her quizzes were very fair, and provided lots of resources to help us throughout the semester. She's also flexible with deadlines and understands her student's needs. There were a lot of assignments though, but she's a lenient prof.

Group projects
Lots of homework
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
STAT205
Grade: A
Dec 5, 2025
Would take again

Well-organized and entertaining lectures! The weekly assignments seem like a lot, but they're worth it to learn and study everything well! Take advantage of office hours, since she was super helpful! She's super sweet and honestly just wants everyone to do well - lectures were great for practice questions with tips and feedback!

Participation matters
Gives good feedback
Lots of homework
2.0
3.0
STAT2O5
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 8, 2025

Nancy was interested in teaching, but her notes were often unclear and were only released during monthly quizzes. Quizzes were fair, but the frequent Gradescope and WebWork assignments made the class stressful, especially with a tight schedule. Online assignments had questions different from the class notes; she never went over them during class.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Caring
1.0
5.0
STAT205
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 10, 2025

Lovely woman but absolutely terrible math teacher. She never actually explains new things, just quickly mumbles through them as if we all already know what she's talking about. Her notes and slides don't match or make any sense. You will have multiple assignments piled on top of each other every week. Pick ANY other prof for this class if you can.

Lots of homework
3.0
3.0
STAT205
Grade: A-
Dec 16, 2025

The professor is kind and caring and takes time to answer questions in class and office hours. However, lectures mostly repeat the notes and are hard to follow, with little added explanation. The notes are long, repetitive, and lack visuals. Weekly written and WebWork assignments pile up quickly, but more helpful than lectures. Quizzes are fair.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
Accessible outside class
4.0
3.0
STAT205
Grade: A+
Dec 28, 2025
Would take again

She is sweet, will give extensions when needed. There is participation marks for questions answered in class, and the course is assignment heavy. Definitely need to keep up with the content, but she teaches the course as clear as possible and goes over things when needed.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
Caring
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

69%

Textbook Required

88%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 31 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (8)
A- (8)
Not sure yet (7)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(6)C(0)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(16)
Based on 39 reported grades
B+: 8
A-: 8
Not sure yet: 7
B: 5
Common Tags
Tough Grader (9)
Lots of homework (9)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (6)
Caring (6)
Participation matters (5)
TEST HEAVY (5)
LECTURE HEAVY (5)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.18 avg change
Dec
May
Jul
Oct
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SCIE301

5.0

(1)

STAT213217

4.5

(2)

213

4.3

(4)

STAT2132

4.0

(1)

STAT213

3.5

(60)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

STAT333

5.0

STAT215

5.0

STAT327

5.0

STATS321

5.0

STAT321

4.4

Similar Professors