prides herself in knowing everything about the wonderful world of chemistry . .

Lecture is pointless, but the handouts are great. Redox and complexation are complex, but easy once you figure it out!

very good

she puts a lot of work and effort into helping you understand the material

I totally disagree with what most of these people have said. I say, go to the lectures. Follow along with the power point and take notes on the handout. That way, doing the pre-lab, lab report, and the post-lab is MUCH easier.

I thought Kerner tried really hard and made alot of sense in her lectures. The problem is with the GSI's because most of them can't understand english so they are no help. If you don't absolutely have to take this class, don't take it.

Lectures didn't really help with the actual labs. The class wasn't that hard but it was a lot more work than what it was worth.

Understanding the lab procedure is much easier after attending her lectures. The only challenge is to stay awake.

Made things understandable. Very good at giving exam hints and practice problems. Nice lectures although dry, but hey this is a lab lecture. Hand outs helpfull

good teacher, knows material, but extremely monotone/boring

Lectures soo boring. She's really hard to listen to, but the exams are easy and she helps out a lot for those.

Visit her in her office, she's EXTREMELY nice. She's very helpful too. Go to her reviews..they are great. The class is very easy, and whether or not you do bad in this class REALLY depends on your teammates..if they suck, your team grade will suck..just hope that you get diligent teammates

Her lecture is so bizarre... she mixes some stuff together, we watch, we don't learn much, we go to lab and get confused, and we end up getting horrible grades on our lab reports. Strange. Just strange. You'll have to see for yourself.

Lab grading is difficult and unfair. Exams are easy though if you study with the past exams posted on the website. Grade probably depends most on teammates and english speaking ability of gsi (often not very good)

Great lecturer. Class can be tedious but overall a good experince. Helps out alot and clear on what she expects...

Overall, it is a tedious class, worth more than the measley 2 credits. However, she is really interested in helping students do well, especially if you go to the reviews. Her lectures always made the labs more clear and helped with the exams. I don't know why people are so frustrated with her.

A bit crazy, but she was really nice and helpful whenever you talked to her. People hate her for her hard grading, but in truth, her tests are easy as hell. Just look at last year's exam. It is the same one word for word. No joke. Her class was the only class I got an A without even trying because of the test trick.

Chem 125 labs are horrible and the gsi grading sucks and is pretty much unfair, but Kerner is extremely helpful in curving certain sections and making sure everyone is being graded fairly compared to other sections. Exams are easy and pretty much identical to review sheets/practice exams. Lecture is boring and all the info can be found online.

Lecture is very boring, but the exams are completely straightforward and accurately reflect the material- no surprises.

hard lab grading, but incredibly easy exams....she will curve your section if it seems unfair so don't complain and just do the work........good teacher

She seemed like a decently nice person, and the material didn't seem too bad, but her lectures are like an hour long induced nap. The woman, literally, has no inflection in her voice at all. It'd be more exciting to watch grass grow.

No Comments

Lectures are boring, monotone voice. Review sessions before exams are really helpful. Material is not hard, as long as you attend her lectures or at least read over the notes she posts, you will be well-prepared for each lab. I think the grading for lab reports is harsh, but my GSI gave feedback on how to improve right away, so we did better after

Kerner is a pretty good lecturer, better than the ones you'll have for CHEM 130. That said, whether or not you'll enjoy the course and do well is entirely dependent on your GSI. I had a bad GSI, so I thought the course was pretty terrible. Kerner was good, though.

I loved Kerner.

There's not much you can do... if you're taking Chem 125, you have to deal with Kerner. It's not her fault though.. the GSIs are much more important than she is for this class. Her lectures are worth attending... they're not great, but once in a while she gives out hints and tips that could save you when it's time for lab.

In my mind, she got the job done just fine. She went over what we were going to be doing in the next lab, and that's what I expected from a lab lecture class. She also had some good review sessions towards the end of the class for the exams. Not bad at all to me.

Yeah its boring but what do you expect out of a chem lab lecture. She does a fine job explaining the lab, but you can definatly get away with skiping lecture if you just read the labbook. Go to lecture for redox, complexation, and exam reviews. Otherwise, it helps, but you don't need to.

i liked her a lot. she's really helpful and you can tell that she actually wants you to succeed in the class and understand what is going on in lab. if you go to lecture, it really helps!!

This class sucks. The amount of work put in for a two credit class is ridiculous. But she knows her stuff, and the review sessions she has prior to exams are a life saver. I would not have passed the exams if I hadn't had gone to those

While 125 is perhaps the most useless and painful class this university has to offer, (especially if you get two idiots for lab partners), I enjoyed attending Nancy's lectures. They were informative and helped with the exams. Her lab assistant, Ed, was entertaining as well. If there were a TV show called "Nancy & Ed," it would be a success.

Nancy's lectures were interesting but not necessarily helpful.

About half of the lectures were very helpful, but others you can easily skip and probably be better off for the lab. The labs themselves are interesting, but the lab reports take waaaaay too much time out of class. This class will take a lot of time. Thank god for my GSI though, she was amazing.

Lecture was helpful with prelabs and Yes lab reports take an insanely large amount of time, but the reviews,endless practice tests,& q&a sessions make it easy to do really well on the exams, I understand chem125 concepts really well. And FYI its not suppose to be completely in sync with chem130. Nancy truly wants you to do well

I enjoyed it.My team started with a B- on the first ex, and went up to A+ by the end of the 6th experiment.This class is not useless.True, it is hard and takes a lot of time, but what kind of premeds or science majors are you if you can't handle an elementary chem lab class? So, suck it up, losers, this is UofM for a reason.

do your pre-lab during class while she's explaining the lab because she'll go over all the answers indirectly. Make your presentations PERFECT because they take away a lot of points. Go to all review sessions, do all prac. exams and you'll do fine. go to her if you get any kind of stain on your clothes, shoes, etc. buy her taco bell to suck up!

The class is not hard, it just takes a lot of time to make all of the presentations. If you go to her review sessions, and you memorize the trends, then you will get an A on the tests.

Nancy Kerner was a great professor who is very knowledgeable and able to communicate important information easily.

Kerner's really not as bad as everyone says. It's the class that's bad, not her. I recommend going to lecture, even though half of the students skip. Kerner is easy to understand, though she lectures a bit slow. By all means though, Chem 125 is terrible. Don't take it unless it's a requirement!!

125 is a very easy class, as long as you do the labs each week and take the practice tests before the exams, which are very straightforward. My partners were not very bright and I ended up having to do the labs myself, but on the bright side, I ended up learning a lot more and, as a result, aced the tests.

She tries hard to teach in an interesting way but she really fails. Lecture hall was full in the beginning, now it's eerily empty. She sings, uses cartoons, etc but her voice is just so sleepy! I like her as a person.

Don't bother going to lectures. Just skim over the powerpoint prior to attending lab. Do the practice tests and bombard the GSIs with questions during office hours and you will ace both hourly exams. As far as the lab reports go, it's very much luck of the draw. If you get a good lab group/helpful GSI, chances are you will do well.

Good prof. She made lectures and concepts very clear. She literally spoon-fed us what we do for the experiments and what is on the exams (which were very easy by the way). The only problem with the class is the busy work (lab reports, power points, pre-labs, etc.) and that some GSIs are super-hard graders. A good lab group also helps.

Nancy is actually a very good lecturer, despite how much work she makes this class. If you have half a brain (I'm assuming most people reviewing her did not), an A is definitely not hard to get - just be careful of the points you lose. For 2 credits, the class is a lot of work, but there are a lot of resources provided to help you.

Dr. Kerner is getting a bad rap on this site. She is very helpful if you just go to see her in office hours and the lectures spell out exactly what you do in lab. People who say this is a ton of work are lazy. Spending 4-8 hours on a team lab report is not bad at all. Also the exams are identical to the practice exams.

She was very helpful and understanding. Nancy wanted all of her students to do well, and have an appreciation for chemistry. The labs were doable as long as you worked hard. If you're team members are slacking and are not helping with lab reports, you have to take it upon yourself to complete them. Memorize all practice exams and an A is possible.

Nancy is really boring but if you can stay awake during lecture you will find it helpful. Lab is nearly impossible without going to lecture or at least researching beforehand. Not a very fun class

Overall, Chem 125 can be a pain because of all the group work involved. As a professor, Kerner isn't as bad as everyone makes her out to be. While her lectures are very boring, they are also very clear. Labs are very, very difficult to perform/understand without them. If you go to lecture and use the practice exams, you should get a good grade.

Nancy Kerner seems monotonous only if you sit in the back. In the front row, she is sassy and funny and a great professor. You just have to pay attention.

The lectures are helpful for knowing what to do in the lab, though the extra credit for the class is unfairly given. The lab manual is confusing.

The class is hard if you get a bad group/bad GSI but Nancy is actually fine. She held helpful reviews before the exam and put up a ton of practice tests that end up being 90% of the actual test.