2.9

Nancy True

Chemistry - University of California Davis

2.9
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
118
Reviews
2.9
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
2.8
Helpful
3.0
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

118

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

15

4

29

3

37

2

29

1

8

What Students Say

easy professor if you do the hw and take good notes

CHEM2A - 5.0 rating

Lecture is useless (notes online)

CHEM2A - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
Rather_Not_Say (2)
Not_Sure_Yet (2)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 5 reported grades
Rather_Not_Say: 2
Not_Sure_Yet: 2
B: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.05 avg change
Dec
Jan
Dec
Mar
Dec
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHE125

5.0

(1)

CHEM110A

5.0

(1)

CHE110B

4.5

(2)

CHE

4.0

(2)

CHEM110B

4.0

(1)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

SCIENCE

5.0

CHE2AH

3.7

CHEM2AH

3.4

CHEM2A

3.1

CHE1A

3.0

Reviews (118)
5.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Mar 12, 2002

easy professor if you do the hw and take good notes

3.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Mar 22, 2002

Not bad...boring and redundant. Lecture is useless (notes online)

3.0
3.0
CHE2A
Apr 16, 2002

So boring...lecture is useless, my particular TA was more useless (X. Tang)

2.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Nov 13, 2002

boring and hard tests

4.0
2.0
CHE2A
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Nov 13, 2002

everything is online, tests are identical in format to tests online

2.0
3.0
CHE1A
Nov 18, 2002

VERY boring, can study by yourself online. TA's and workshops are more helpful

1.0
5.0
CHE002A
Jan 7, 2003

No Comments

4.0
2.0
CHE2A
Jan 13, 2003

Notes online, lecture useless

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Jan 23, 2003

No Comments

5.0
2.0
CHE002A
Feb 20, 2003

Good & extensive notes. Not too exciting, but not bad. She loves her subject!

2.0
3.0
CHE2A
Feb 25, 2003

Fair tests but did not explain course material very well. Took her lectures directly out of the book.

3.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Mar 4, 2003

lecutres are pretty pointless, but her tests are predictable. no surprises. got an A in the class.

2.0
3.0
CHE2B
Mar 11, 2003

SO BORING, Tests not hard, but very long.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2B
Mar 18, 2003

Lectures were so incredibly boring. I found myself sleeping through all of them. Her tests are predictable though- just like the practice midterms.

2.0
4.0
CHE2A
Mar 31, 2003

BORING! Lecture is useless but atleast the notes are online. I stopped going to class after a while.

4.0
2.0
CHE110B
Apr 16, 2003

lectures organized. teaches really fast. tests and grading fair/easy

4.0
1.0
CHEM2A
Jun 8, 2003

Lectures are useless and boring. Tests are easy and straight forward. If you've taken ap chem the class is real easy.

5.0
1.0
CHEM2A
Jun 30, 2003

She's pretty easy...and her tests won't give you too much of a headache. An easy teacher and she presents the material very well (and it's CHE 2a, simple stuff =P ). I'd recommend her.

3.0
2.0
CHE2A
Sep 23, 2003

Not to bad of a class. Pretty boring. It was pretty difficult but the curve brought my grade up to an A. Just make sure you do better than everyone else.

5.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Oct 16, 2003

Direct with expectations, clear with material, organized

2.0
5.0
CHEM2A
Oct 18, 2003

she doesn't teach anything. it's a boring class. her tests are hard.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Oct 20, 2003

She is VERY boring, but laughs a lot when she does experiments during lectures. She tries to be clear and fair, but is only probably fair. Midterms get excellent curves. Expect to work hard, but review a lot from AP Chemistry.

4.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Nov 11, 2003

does not explain things very well but overall is not too difficult

2.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Nov 11, 2003

Lectures are a bunch of jibber-jabber if you actually manage to stay awake. Practice midterms help, nice online notes.

4.0
2.0
CHE
Nov 12, 2003

she grades on a curve and the curve is really nice. notes posted online. lectures very boring.

3.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Nov 13, 2003

rambles a little in her lectures, but online notes are the greatest-her lectures follow the notes exactly. tests are more complicated than the practice midterms she gives online, so study hard

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Nov 13, 2003

no comment

4.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Nov 15, 2003

She loves and knows her material, so she can answer any questions I have. Lectures are funny when she does experiments. The practice midterms are similar to the real ones.

1.0
5.0
SCIENCE
Dec 11, 2003

boring!!! she does not make the class even worth going to. online notes are nice, but keeps you from not attending lecture.

5.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 11, 2003

She is a nice person. Her tests are really, really hard. But, her lecture notes are very concise and clear. (You don't have to read the book to understand). Do all the homework and the practice exams... be prepared for some hard questions on the exams.

4.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 12, 2003

Online notes are a plus. Her lectures can be a bit dull, but otherwise, the class is good. Do the practice midterms and finals religiously, and you'll do fine in the course.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 12, 2003

Although online notes are helpful, they don't cover the more difficult example problems. Her lectures are SOOOOOOOO BORING!!! MY GOD!!! SHE SPEAKS IN FRIGGIN' MONOTONE!!! IMPOSSIBLE TO STAY AWAKE OR LEARN!!!

2.0
3.0
CHE2A
Dec 12, 2003

Very boring lectures, monotone voice; hard tests; huge curves; need more hard example questions so we can understand the material and prepare for the exams

2.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Dec 18, 2003

She can't teach! Just read the lecture notes and do the practice exams and you should be fine!

3.0
3.0
CHE2A
Jan 2, 2004

some of the info in true's lectures is much clearer than in the book, but she can be a confusing at times. it's hard to know what material to expect on the tests for free response sections.

5.0
2.0
CHE2A
Jan 3, 2004

Lectures weren't stimulating, but explained material well. Posts all lecture notes online, I recommend studying them instead of the textbook. Tests closely follow sample tests.

1.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Jan 4, 2004

Bah! She is, by far, one of the worst teachers I have had. She goes on rants, boasting her own mastery of chemistry by relating useless facts and random first year college physics interjections to scare the children...a solid waste.

4.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Jan 4, 2004

She is very BORING at her lectures, but her lecture notes clear everything up you need to learn in her class. Don't waste time on reading the chapters, lecture notes explain them all. Tests are fairly easy if you STUDY for them.

4.0
3.0
CHE2A
Feb 1, 2004

No Comments

2.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Feb 9, 2004

Boring, ineffectual teacher. But nice legs.

5.0
2.0
CHE2A
Feb 10, 2004

She was a really cool professor. Her lecture notes were really helpful, examples made a lot of sense, tests had a huge curve, and she likes to bring stuff to play with like liquid nitrogen and hydrogen+oxygen to play with as a demo during lecture. =)

3.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Feb 11, 2004

If you can stay awake through her lectures, bravo to you. Very dry, but clear. Looking at the book helps.

4.0
1.0
CHE2A
Mar 5, 2004

Tests are very easy as long as you study for them. Almost identical to practice exams. Lecture is a little boring, but at times she does things to change it up a little bit.

4.0
2.0
CHE002A
Mar 22, 2004

Though lectures were not the most exciting, the information provided made Chem make sense. Tests nearly mirrored the sample exams. Lecture notes posted online, and quite possibly the best part of the class. Demos livened up the lecture some.

2.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Nov 1, 2004

No Comments

4.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Nov 8, 2004

It takes eager chemists to stay awake in her lectures. However, exams are easy and all the lecture notes are online!! So u can sleep right through the lectures and still be able to keep up.

2.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Nov 8, 2004

lectures are okay. she's very monotonous, so though i stay awake, my mind can start to fall asleep. but she seems like a nice person. last midterm pretty similar to practice exam but longer and a few more twists...dont underestimate...

4.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Nov 11, 2004

zzzzzz.... its a class where she teaches the techniques of falling asleep.. her lectures are boring.. even though she occasionally brings in props to do demos and all... i barely go to class coz i can just sleep on my bed instead. however, her notes are very clear and its great they're online.:P

2.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Nov 13, 2004

This class is very difficult. The lectures are so boring and she has a droning voice that definitely puts you to sleep. Thank goodness the lectures are posted online so you can read them when you've woken up later on in the day.

2.0
4.0
CHE2A
Nov 18, 2004

It is hard to stay awake in this class. She's good at talking people to sleep. Monotonous voice... zzzzzz...

1.0
4.0
CHE2A
Dec 1, 2004

Lemme just give you a couple quotes from Nancy True: "I try not to put questions on the test that I don't know." "Let's pretend I didn't do that." "It's kind of like a spinning top. Only not." Just to give you an idea. Her lectures are boring, I suggest just doing the Aggie crossword during class

3.0
2.0
CHE2A
Dec 7, 2004

Skip the class and read the lectures online. If I go to class I sleep through it, and I haven't opened my book yet and still have a B (don't read online lectures, either) = easy class.

1.0
5.0
CHE2A
Dec 9, 2004

wow,i thought i didn't have a big wardrobe, but nancy, she only has one outfit.blue jeans, a black turtle neck, black belt,& black boots & i thought comb overs were out.hmm maybe it's just me. rambles about stuff & then says "but you don't need to know that." so what was the point of lecture again?

4.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 12, 2004

A dry lecturer, but she clearly outlays things. She does seem to care about the students and how they find the tests. If you can read the textbook and stay awake during the lectures, you should do allright. She does tend to talk a lot about things that aren't directly relevent, so doublecheck.

5.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Dec 13, 2004

she's a pretty good professor, lectures are kind of boring, and she does explain irrelevent material. but she's really helpful during office hours and her tests are pretty easy

2.0
4.0
CHE2A
Grade: B
Dec 13, 2004

Do everything you can to get a different professor. In her lectures, she simply mentions things that you might find on the final, and then she doesnt tell you how to find them. Very hard to stay awake during the class. The only good thing about the class is the curve.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 14, 2004

DO NOT go to any lectures, study on ur own at her notes is 100x better. totally useless lectures..and ZZZzz at all time. Exams ain't so bad, she gives easiest exams out of all other chem2A professors. but it ain't that easy.

2.0
3.0
CHE2A
Dec 15, 2004

SHe is such a boring lecturer!!!! I hardly ever went to class because she posts her notes online and then basically reads off of them during lecture. One good thing is that she posts her notes online and they are pretty clear.

3.0
4.0
CHE2A
Dec 15, 2004

Difficult, but that's how the class is intended to be. If you have a hard time with Chem in this class, you'll have a hard time with Chem in any class. She has a funny nerdy personality, although could explain better. There's also potential for the best curve you've ever seen.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Dec 15, 2004

Nice online notes and wonderful curve on tests. I could do just as well without her. I've mostly learned from the book and practice problems. This is the only class I fall asleep in because it's so dry. She likes to spend half the class on a topic and then say "oh, you don't need to know this."

3.0
2.0
CHE002A
Dec 15, 2004

I wasn't impressed by the lextures, but she makes up for it by putting her notes online. The curve is gorgeous, because everyone else is a moron. It really depends on wether you get a good TA or not.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Dec 18, 2004

Lectures are boring beyond belief. With how she teaches, you can just read the book before the test and do fine. She goes over a million examples which is nice, but boring after a while. Good TAs make the lab part easy. Tests aren't really hard, but you have to know what you are doing.

4.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 18, 2004

Lectures are monotone, and you can sometimes just read her posted lecture notes in case you miss class. Definitely pray for a good TA so labs arent bad and discussions are helpful. The book can be very helpful if you get lost in lecture

3.0
3.0
CHEM2
Dec 19, 2004

Very boring lectures. I would fall asleep at the 9am section 4 out of 5 times. She does post her lecture on the web for easy access. Pray for a good TA.

3.0
3.0
CHE2A
Dec 21, 2004

wow she is boring. her tests arent bad though, just study. read the lec notes online and do the practice exams as well as prac problems from the book that she assigns. forget lecture...you dont need it.

3.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 22, 2004

No Comments

3.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Dec 26, 2004

Her lectured were BORING! Fell asleep a couple times, so attend class with some energy. Exams were challenging. Problems were confusing, so do the practice exams and the HARDEST exercise problems in the book. Overall, class is hard if you fall behind, so don't! BTW- class averages for exams were low

2.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Dec 26, 2004

Her lectures are really boring. I didn’t learn anything from her lectures! Also don’t rely much on her practice midterms because they are not similar to the real test. Just do all the problems she assigns and you should be fine.

4.0
3.0
CHE2A
Dec 27, 2004

A nice woman; two people I know were sick when they took a midterm, and she helped them out. Just learn the material when she lectures on it. It's difficult to learn her material the day before an exam. Overall, a decent lecturer.

5.0
3.0
CHE2A
Dec 27, 2004

Professor True is a fantastic professor - I enjoyed all of her lectures.She puts a great deal of time and energy into ensuring the students learn as much as possible.Tests are fair, but difficult - put your all into it, and you'll do well. I did!!!:)

5.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Dec 30, 2004

BASICALLY EVERYTHING SHE SAYS IN LECTURE ARE RIGHT FROM HER POSTED NOTES ONLINE. I WONDER WHY PEOPLE EVEN GO TO LECTURE, SO DONT FREAK OUT IF U HAPPEN TO MISS A LECTURE, CUZ ITS ALL GOOD IN THE HOOD. HER PRACTICE MIDTERMS ARE NOT MUCH HELP SINCE SHE BlTCH SLAPS U WITH A DIFF TEST ON THE REAL ONES.

3.0
3.0
CHE16A
Dec 30, 2004

Lectures are unfathomably boring, but she does test you on what she teaches. My advice...do the homework and I mean do ALL the practice problems...you'll regret it on the midterms. Just pray you get an easy lab TA.

4.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Jan 1, 2005

class is pretty straight forward. notes are all online, just work at your own pace. do the hw or else u'll be stressing when midterms and final come around.

4.0
3.0
CHE2A
Jan 2, 2005

Lecture a bit boring. Has good online notes. Hint: do all the homework problems and practice tests.

4.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Jan 3, 2005

True's printable online notes make up for boring lectures. They are very helpful for understanding and studying. Tip: do all assigned work, read for basic comprehension before class, print notes and take them to class -- she will stick to these notes for the entire lecture. Huge grade curve!

3.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Jan 3, 2005

Her class was difficult, but if you do all the work, study for the tests using her lecture notes and past tests you should do fine. Make sure you know how to do all the types of word problems. Sometimes she puts a nasty one on the test. Good Luck!

2.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Jan 3, 2005

Boring lectures. Online notes discourage concentrating and note taking in class. Doesnt collect homework.

3.0
3.0
CHE2A
Jan 3, 2005

She gives lectures straight from the book and provides great lecture notes online. It is probably possible to pass this class without going to lecture, though I didn't do it that way. If you read the book and do the practice problems you will do fine. Her tests are just like her practice tests.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Jan 4, 2005

Wow. Unless you have a chem translater or a smart friend to help you understand, or unless youve taken this class in the past, GOOD LUCK. It helps to do the practice problems, and her practice tests if anything. I felt her lectures were a yawner (// to teacher in Ferris Buller) & a waste of paper :)

2.0
5.0
CHEM2A
Jan 5, 2005

monotonous

3.0
3.0
CHE2B
Jan 6, 2005

veryyy boring lectures, but she tells you what you need to know - just ignore the confusing extra side notes. i only went to them for the example problems. hook up with study groups and go to your TA's review sessions. tests are VERY similar to the practice examples posted online.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Jan 7, 2005

Notes very helpful in class, but pactice exams were the most helpful. Class not to hard just pay attention and do the work.

4.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Jan 10, 2005

Seemed approachable. Her notes were very helpful, but her lectures were overall boring. She was pretty monotone, but she did get the information across. BE SURE TO GO TO CLASS, it helps a lot. Do the practice exams also. Not a bad teacher, just a bit boring.

3.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Jan 11, 2005

monotone,boring lecture- i fight so hard to stay awake, lecture kinda helps, but not alot.however, the test is the eaisest out of all chem professor...good choice to take!

3.0
2.0
CHEMISTRY
Jan 28, 2005

She's smart and put clear examples when needed but her lectures are so incredibly boring. After twenty minutes, most of the class is asleep. Her tests are alright though. She doesn't put in super hard questions which is good.

3.0
2.0
CHE002A
Feb 2, 2005

pretty boring lectures, but her test are easy compared to others.

3.0
2.0
CHE2A
Feb 4, 2005

Easy easy professor, test are a breeze. If you've taking chem before, her class will be cake. If you havent taken chem before, her lectures are the most boring i've ever had

1.0
3.0
CHE2A
Feb 9, 2005

Wow, she's awful, avoid her at all costs. Seriously, do anything you can to avoid her, the first day of class the guy sitting next to me fell asleep and was drooling, it was so boring. tests are similar to practice, she LOVES iodine for some reason...

4.0
1.0
CHE2A
Feb 10, 2005

Her class was SOOO BORING! (And I'm the nerdy type too!) But her notes were the best and her tests were the easiest compared to everyone else's. Love, love, love her print-out notes. Everything you need to know w/o reading the book.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2A
Feb 18, 2005

very confusing, sometimes she did not even know what she was talking about herself. midterms were hard. final was extremely hard. not very helpful. she is nice, but not a good teacher.

4.0
2.0
CHE2A
Feb 19, 2005

her lectures are pretty boring... but overall the lecture notes really help... just focus on what the examples are gven on the lecture notes and the class should be a cake walk

3.0
3.0
CHEM2A
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Mar 12, 2005

Exams are quite similiar to practice exams. Boring lectures but quite clear.

4.0
5.0
CHE2A
Mar 15, 2005

monotonous lectures but they are useful. she does appropriate examples and gives u hints on the exam. tests are hard. overall she's an ok prof. dont take kelly for 2B. he makes her look like an angel; my gookness.

2.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Mar 18, 2005

Lectures were REALLY boring, fell asleep almost every time. She posts practice tests online though which are REALLY similar to the actual tests.

4.0
2.0
CHEM2A
Mar 19, 2005

She is an overall good teacher

2.0
3.0
CHE2A
Mar 28, 2005

She is a nice woman, but very monotone, boring lectures. She was also not clear when explaining some concepts during lecture, and other people in the class I talked to couldn't understand either. She is kind of confusing, however, the class itself isn't really difficult as long as ucan do problems

3.0
2.0
CHEMISTRY2A
Sep 15, 2005

her lectures are pretty boring, but overall the class is easy. mild studying before exams is all that's really required, other than lab.

4.0
3.0
CHE
Sep 25, 2005

nice lady, standard chem professor-type.

3.0
3.0
CHE2BH
Nov 19, 2005

A decent teacher if you manage to stay awake. Nice, easy to approach. However, get a good TA because some concepts she explains in very difficult ways, likes to teach chemistry as if it were a math proof.

2.0
3.0
CHE2AH
Dec 16, 2005

Monotonous and unclear at times. She spends a lot of time concentrating on the details instead of the general picture. But she definitely knows the material.

3.0
3.0
CHE2AH
Dec 26, 2005

A very nice lady but a bad chem professor. Her voice would put yu to sleep and half of the stuff she says is not really that important. Thank god i had a great T.A otherwise...ouch!

3.0
2.0
CHEM2AH
Jan 4, 2006

she's really nice and friendly, easy to talk to, but she talks in a monotone. she also goes into a lot of stuff that is not so relevant - don't bother studying derivations of equations, classical experiments, etc. final exam was really easy, midterms were harder. do the practice exams and get a good TA - you'll be fine.

3.0
3.0
CHE2AH
Feb 18, 2006

Nancy uses microsoft word as her visual aid/lecture device and she's not that clear during her lectures, but just read the textbook and try to do the homework problems and you'll be more than fine on the exams, because her curve was amazingly satisfying and just try your best.

4.0
1.0
CHE2A
Mar 26, 2006

Be prepared to sleep, its True. Just read the book and do the problems and youll be fine.

2.0
4.0
CHE2AH
Nov 16, 2006

Honors Chemistry, I personally never went to her office hours, but in class she wasn't that helpful. She basically expects you to read the textbook and understand the material. The lectures that she has aren't very detailed, and they generally skim over the material that you've already read in the textbook. Just hope that you get a good TA.

2.0
5.0
CHE2AH
Nov 29, 2006

You're on your own, Prof True is way too into chemistry to be able to bring it down to undergrad level. My TA sucks which makes the class worse but Prof True is awesome.

5.0
3.0
CHEM2AH
Dec 4, 2006

Attending the class is usually useful though it can be somewhat boring. Don't stress experiments or derivations of equations. Make sure to look at the practice midterms. She is very helpful in office hours so go if you have any questions on the homework.

3.0
3.0
CHE110A
Dec 8, 2006

She gives a lot of history and experiments and as a result we are behind. Then she rushed 3 chapters in 2 weeks. The hw is really long and repetitive. The test is all based on the notes and homework. I went to office hour once, waited for 1 hour, but she never showed up.

1.0
3.0
CHEM2AH
Jan 17, 2007

I'm sure that Prof. True is absolutely brilliant, but she could not lecture coherently if her life depended on it. She derived Schrodinger's equation in class. Twice. I appreciate her passion for Chemistry, but lecturing is not her thing.

4.0
4.0
CHE2AH
Feb 12, 2007

I really learned a lot in this class, but I had to do a lot of hard work. Don't sweat your grade. Her curve is VERY generous. Hint on the homework tests: Read up on solving systems of linear equations. Most of the "tricky" computational problems can be solved easily by creating a system of linear equations and solving the system.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2AH
Feb 14, 2007

She was so smart that it sounded like she was speaking a different language. The curve was awesome though.

2.0
4.0
CHE002A
Feb 20, 2008

This was the first class I had in college, and it was also probably the worst. 8 AM, incredibly difficult, terrible lab, and unfair unit amounts. You can do well if you go to every class and study, but there's nothing exciting about this class.

5.0
4.0
CHE2AH
Dec 24, 2008

She's very nerdy. Gets a little too excited about chemistry and starts going off on complicated chemistry tangents that are above the level of the course.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2AH
Jan 2, 2009

a very nice woman but honestly.... terrible at giving clear comprehensible lectures. The majority of the time i had no idea what she was saying & was completely lost. She tends to overcomplicate things and talks in monotone (BORING). My teacher was the textbook. HARD class, but AMAZING curve. pray for an easy TA for good lab grades. office hrs help

5.0
4.0
CHE110B
Dec 11, 2010

Physical chemistry is a hard class, you need to know when to ask for help. Go to lecture. Go to Office hours if you need it, remember that it gets easier. She is nerdy. Which is a really awesome quality in a professor, you know.

5.0
2.0
CHE125
Mar 24, 2011

Do the work! Don't start the labs the night before. Put in the time and effort. Huge curve and good reward for effort

4.0
1.0
CHEM110B
Dec 7, 2011

Tests are pretty much plug and chug, very much like practice midterms, grades on a curve. Really doesn't expect you to know much more than a really reasonable amount.

5.0
1.0
CHEM110A
Dec 20, 2012

Go to class, shes really awesome at explaining the material. Goes by the text so reading it will help greatly. Tests are really concepts gone over in class, put in the work and you will be rewarded. Easy A for Chem E majors, kinda hard for regular Chem majors due to the math involved.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
Rather_Not_Say (2)
Not_Sure_Yet (2)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 5 reported grades
Rather_Not_Say: 2
Not_Sure_Yet: 2
B: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.05 avg change
Dec
Jan
Dec
Mar
Dec
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHE125

5.0

(1)

CHEM110A

5.0

(1)

CHE110B

4.5

(2)

CHE

4.0

(2)

CHEM110B

4.0

(1)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

SCIENCE

5.0

CHE2AH

3.7

CHEM2AH

3.4

CHEM2A

3.1

CHE1A

3.0

Similar Professors