3.1
Quality3.2
Difficulty53%
Would Retake89
Reviews53%
Would Retake
89
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
26
4
14
3
10
2
18
1
21
What Students Say
“I got scared to ask questions, he would sometimes be dismissive and shoot down ideas”
SOCI240 - 2.0 rating“Unclear, and says "come up with whatever" when he really did have expectations he just withheld”
SOCI466 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
36%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
-0.16 avg changeRatings by Course
SOCI365
5.0
(1)SOCI100
4.7
(6)SOCI224
4.5
(4)SOCI200
3.9
(10)SOCI240
3.2
(12)Difficulty by Course
SOCI466
4.4
SOCI361
3.7
SOCI200
3.0
SOCI102
3.0
SOC102
3.0
Reviews (89)
Neil is super passionate about family sociology, and lectures were always interesting. We had 3 short midterms, easy to ace if you study and take good notes, 3 critical writings (graded them collectively to reward overall improvement) and a final case study paper. He was very available to meet, and was helpful with the final paper. Really nice guy
LOVED Neil! I have never had such a passionate professor like him throughout my entire undergrad career. He ignited my extreme interest in Sociology, and I might even minor in it! HILARIOUS, CARING, and VERY accessible (: I looked forward to his lectures every week, and the personal anecdotes he threw in were unprecedented. Will miss him!
I loved SOCI200 with Neil, there was a variety of testing methods (paper, midterm, online submissions) made the class very interesting, and lectures were easy to follow along with and slides were clear. Overall, a great class.
Prior to taking Neil's course, I hadn't taken a Sociology course before. His lectures were very enjoyable and he always made sure to offer many opportunities to meet and discuss concepts and gradings. A very fair professor and a friendly person as well. Would I take another SOCI course? -No, Would I take another course with Neil? -You bet!
Neil was a really fun professor. Because of his "relaxed" characteristics you would assume he would be an easier marker, but I found he definitely was tougher than I originally thought. He is very honest and open. He will tell you a lot about his life in relation to the content. This is a good elective if you want to learn more about "The Family"
Neil is one of the best profs I have ever had. He is so personal and goes out of his way to ensure every student is succeeding. Neil's teaching style is perfect because he tells stories about growing up in Sweden so you can apply the theories to real life events. He is such an inspiration, take this class with him and you will not regret it.
You will not hear a balanced opinions in this class. Neil teaches only things that he believes in and if you don't agree than you are wrong. His 'learning evaluation' was a particular concern: the prof will give you a grade on how you grade yourself. You better not write something that he does not approve of.
Great prof
Pretty good prof, his criteria for exams are not as specific but if you do the readings and go to class you should be good :)
Grading criteria is unclear for the assignments. Exams are easy if you study using the practice questions and in-class review quizzes. Need to go to discussion/tutorial but can skip lecture. Does not treat students with respect, very condescending. Did not enjoy this class at all. Breakdown of assignments makes it ok to mess up on one or a few.
The class itself isn't too difficult if you put effort into it. Gives terrible feedback on assignments. You will get bad marks if you do not write exactly what he wants you to write. He also didn't mention how piazza contributions would contribute to your overall grade. His "learning evaluation" was graded on content rather than completion.
he needs to learn how to reply to emails... he is not super tough but some nonsense in his marking (E.g. learning evaluations), sassy at times
Overall, a really good professor! Ask him for help and he will provide you with a lot of feedback.
The class itself is not difficult but the feedback for assignments is terrible, the assessment of certain parts of the course (piazza and the learning evaluation) is very unclear. He can come across as rude and also spends much of the lecture talking about himself rather than content. Asks very specific questions on exams when he claims he won't.
Why was there so much work for a 100 lvl course?? Also the TA grading was so random and harsh... the feedback didn't make sense either. At one point the TA just gave everyone the same mark for wildly different projects. Neil is funny but I found him to make some pretty hypocritical remarks at times... especially for a class on social inequalities.
Neil seems passionate about sociology. Can be funny but sometimes jokes are a little off-colour, especially in the context of a social inequality class. Has some problematic views on Indigenous Peoples and women. He gives vague and ambiguous outlines/expectations for assignments and grades VERY tough with confusing feedback.
Amazing professor. Loved the lectures he gave. I wasn't much into sociology but it was a required course for my major. The content he taught and the way he taught it made it probably my favourite class that term! Great sense of humor btw and a very fair marker. Would definitely 11/10 take this class again.
One of the best profs at UBC. Very interesting lectures, material was tough at times but would make it as simple as possible. Responded quickly to emails with helpful suggestions. Found the material to be slightly difficult as I took it during his first time teaching the course, had some ironing out to do with projects but overall loved him! YES
Gives a false impression that the class will be enjoyable and relative easy, as there is no midterm or final. He makes up for it with weekly, intensive quizzes, and very difficult assignments that he gives very vague guidelines and no sample for. He also gives us very long and irrelevant readings (which we are mainly tested on).
Neil is really funny. He does bits in his lectures that keep you entertained and focussed. He may have a few hot takes, but welcomes discussion and a couple debates. The discussion groups are the main bulk, unfortunately... but nevertheless he's probably the best pick for SOCI102.
Neil is hilarious, like every class, he deserves a lot more credit as a prof. Hard marker, a little bit, but he takes everyone seriously. In the once a week format, you have to go. There are these group work periods that make up a huge portion of your grade. Other than that, there are multiple-choice online quizzes and a term paper.
Hilarious. Some jokes are bad & disrespectful. We had a group project every week that went to your grade. Tiny word count. Sometimes when you asked a question he would go through a long explanation that didn't even answer the question. You don't have to go to one of the classes every week cause no tests! You may want lecture content for ur papers
Everything, except the survey, was marked by the TAs so that doesn't say much. However, I do think that Neil did teach us a lot about sociology and was very clear of his expectations. In terms of assessments, his midterm was a bit unfair as to how heavy it was. He tells jokes, thoughtful, but he can be a bit "mean" when he disagrees to people.
Neil Armitage attempted to be subtly humble but came off as the opposite. He would often go off on tangents about his life (only a few times were his stories relevant) and would detract from the slides. His midterm was disorganized and confusing to study for. I was interested in the content but Armitage diminished my enjoyment.
I recently had him for the online semester. He was very understanding of time differences and made room in the syllabus for flexibility and gave us the choice of learning topics that were of personal interest. The thing I liked least in the course were the group discussions. An interesting lecturer but course is still largely based on textbook.
Neil is a really great professor who puts a lot of emphasis on learning for the love of learning rather than the grade. His lectures are very interesting and he provides really good feedback. Great teacher.
Neil has been so incredibly understanding of our situation. Ultimately he just wants his students to learn and be successful. He will go on tangents, and go on about how he lived in Sweden and speaks Swedish but he will relate sociology to real-life situations. He is empathetic (his grading is questionable and subjective) but everyone LOVES Neil.
Funny, relatable, passionate guy. At most times, lectures were hard to follow because he didn't use a mic & I could barely hear him (also has a thick accent). So it was hard to digest material. Very direct, grades a bit harder than others, & could probably show more care for his students. But, he has a fun energy that made attendance worthwhile.
Neil was exhausted and burnt out during our lectures. He wasn't approachable with questions and we've witnessed students being shut down by questions if it does not follow his method or if he disagrees. The material is entirely based off the textbook and there is no supervision on groupwork, which failed half the time due to lack of constraints.
Neil was my favourite professor this term. Super understanding about the transition to online learning & incredibly accomodating, even extending the due date to the first big assignment a week later for everyone! Lots of personal anecdotes in lecture. You can tell he values participation and effort. Great to talk to in office hours!
Neil is OK. The grading of course content was wildly inconsistent, but it evened out. Very picky grader, pay close attention to his critiques in the weekly module reviews. His lectures covered material nearly identical to the textbook, which felt redundant to me. 70% of our grade were weekly assignments, so you should be OK if you do the work.
I was surprised that his score isn't in the 4s! I took his class in the summer and I really loved it. I think part of the reason I did well is because soci 240 was the only class in the summer term. I agree that you have to look very closely at his criteria and actually pay attention to the content in order to get perfect on quizzes.
I have never met a teacher quite like Neil. He has a dry sense of humor that helps me get through lectures on days where I would rather be in bed. Great guy who is accommodating and open to debate Quiz answers can be subjective sometimes but I would just recommend looking at what the best answer is based on what is most relevant to the text.
I love Neil so much and have taken two classes with him. He is caring and down to earth, and he kept his class structure concise. My only complaint is his often vague criteria and his emphasis on randomized group work weekly during the pandemic. Other than that, I so recommend him for those willing to dig down past the rubric.
Best prof ive ever had! He puts a heavy emphasis on learning the material as opposed to just doing the assignments. We had weekly assignments, which i enjoyed as it helped me better understand the material. There are group projects, but youre allowed to do them solo. No late marks. Such a sweet prof. Ill miss him and the CAP stream!!
Neil was an amazing professor, very considerate about his course's workload, and quite frequently checked in with students to ensure they were mentally okay during stressful periods of the year. He always makes himself available to clear doubts. The environment that he creates in the class is very relaxed and a actually makes learning enjoyable.
SOCI 200 with Neil was great! Lectures were pretty interesting and the class was very chill overall. The course load was bearable with weekly readings and quizzes and an optional group activity. I liked how he gave us different options for the final as well. Hes a passionate guy, Id definitely recommend taking a course with him.
Neil was such a kind teacher. He made efforts to reach out and connect with us and to share personal details so we could get to know him better. He was very nice about late work, often postponing assignments at the last minute (which is a tad annoying if you'd already done them!). Only other con is his rambling, which could get to be a bit much.
Great prof would take again
The syllabus portrays this class as very straightforward (there's no final! just weekly things) BUT the TA and him are very 0-100 with the marking. The textbook quizzes are easy 100% but the short responses are not good marks. The projects are marked harsh and nitpicky and they're worth like 25% too. lectures are also painfully repetitive and long
Professor Armitage is clear, passionate, and his lectures are easy to follow. Some people think he's strict/scary but I disagree -- he seems to genuinely care about his students. Weekly modules, lots of group work. No midterm -- final essay and exam. You need to actively show up for discussions. I really learned a lot from him this semester!
He is a nice guy and is very knowledgable on the subject but one of the hardest markers I have ever seen. I'm not sure if the niceness makes up for the horrible grades.
Neil is the best prof I have had at UBC! He is honest and does not mind speaking his mind whatsoever so that took some getting used to. He is heaving on the group projects and because of the pandemic, he provided as much flexibility as possible. He is not an easy marker but provides detailed feedback, if you pay attention to that you can improve!
Graded on a bunch of different things, also given option whether you want to do group work or solo, options for final project vs exam. I did a final paper and it was actually marked by him not the TA's. Understanding and flexible with due dates. TA's marked weekly worked and were kind-of inconsistent markers. Prof available outside class for help.
I didn't enjoy this class. His lectures are boring.
25% of this course is marked by completeness (it's not formal but everyone gets a full mark), but 25% is the weekly group project. His final paper and exam are all easy to write compared to other SOCI 100-leveled professors'. I like this professor by his relatively loose marking policy and he shows respect towards females and Indigenous.
Neil has been one of my favourite profs at UBC! He is so funny and gives really good lectures. He was super flexible, letting us only pick 2 of the final 4 modules to complete. He does a lot of open discussion in lectures which were great but sometimes gets carried away with discussion, leaving little time to go through the slides.
Dude is hilarious. His class is super easy and he makes the content interesting.
Heavy on group work. I assume I would've had a better experience if my TA was better because she didn't know what was going on and gave horrible grades and bad direction constantly. Neil loves what he's teaching but kind of rambles on tangents with 0 underlying meaning. Found myself kind of lost in this class quite frequently.
Neil harps on specifics in assignments and exams but his lectures are very broad and general. The final project and final exam were both not explained very well, specifically the essay portion of the project.
He's a nice person. But, the slides are VERY vague and lectures extremely boring. All the content you need to know comes from readings. Every week there are two assignments which takes a lot of effort (1 weekly group project + 1 individual assignment). 25% of our grade was the final exam and 25% the final paper so I am unsure of 50% of my grade.
I enjoyed his teaching style and lectures but found him very dismissive when I contacted him about the struggles I was having. He also made it difficult for us to contact him and I felt very unsupported in his class. He is a good lecturer but I did not have pleasant interactions with him.
Neil explains concepts in a way that's easy to understand, and makes them entertaining. There are small weekly assignments, the written questions on the final are similar. Flexible deadlines and take home final. However, make sure you get feedback on your assignments because the way you're supposed to analyze readings takes a while to get used to.
Overall a good prof. Most of his lecture content comes from the textbook. However he is a tough marker - quizzes were easy but he wanted very specific answers for group work and his projects. He was nice in office hours but sometimes rude during class, that being said I would take his class again.
Weekly open-book quiz and then group project. I found the group work was marked very harshly, but the quiz can be an easy A to balance out. Prof gives lots of choices for how to show your learning, especially w/ 3 final options. I thought Neil was engaging and personable; his marking criteria for TAs was tough though
I got scared to ask questions, he would sometimes be dismissive and shoot down ideas. The final assignment does not have an outline which makes completing it quite difficult.
Gave everyone the same grade. Ppl that had him before stopped liking him. Might've been somewhat social and outgoing but was very selective in student interaction and discussion (also cares about certain groups of people and issues more than others). Unclear, and says "come up with whatever" when he really did have expectations he just withheld
Neil cannot handle people with different sociological viewpoints and interests. Only looking at race/gender/class separately through classical theories, he rejects intersectionality, empiricism (which makes soci scholarly), other forms of inequality, and anything that students can relate to. Made sm ignorant remarks about UBC student accessibility
He is a very funny prof but often gets off topic. I emailed him for help, and he basically told me to figure it out myself which to an extent is understandable but he does so in not a very professional manner. Also, he accuses you of not spending time on assignments even when time was spent, and his feedback does not make sense.
If you are looking for an easy A, take Soci 102. However, be aware that he is an extremely condescending professor. He will make fun of you if you attend office hours or need help in any way. He says he's against traditional student-teacher power dynamics but is more patronizing with his students than any other professor I've had.
Tries too hard to be critical, in the end its a woke performance and *hypo*critical
Guy loves the sound of his own voice. Very broad 100 level course so the lectures are 50 mins of fluff teaching concepts that realistically should take 20 mins. Marks the journal assignment tough for the sake of being tough because he wants to "introduce students to uni level marking". Not a complete waste of time tho readings are interesting.
Probably the worst lecturer in the SOCI department. As others have mentioned he likes to talk about himself a lot and is very patronizing to students. If you go to him with a question he isn't helpful and will answer a "yes/no" with rambling which leaves you more confused than you were before. Bad feedback on assignments. I didn't learn anything.
Dr. Armitage gave very engaging lectures mixed with some personal stories of his. He does a great job diving into the different sociological thinkers and what it means to think sociologically. While I may not agree with some of the presented viewpoints, this class really gets you to think and reflect a lot about life through a sociological lens.
Neil is all about himself, his mistake of a life, and his personal opinions that are treated like facts. In upper year practical classes, he expects us to link everything to theory, and acts like articles can only be structured through pre-existing theoretical frameworks (reinforcing a hierarchy - how hypocritical). I disagree with his existence
Struggles to articulate coherent thoughts unless to complain about his sister. Treats class as his psychotherapy. Will realize he's rambled about himself, then say, "So we start to see the personal in the [whatever]," but doesn't connect ideas. Condescending, dismissive. Class scant on theory. Grades you on forced personal feedback of him at end!
When we ask questions on piazza he doesn't give a straightforward answer, but rather asks questions back instead. He is helpful sometimes but for most of the time he's awful at giving assistant.
This is the worst professor at UBC! Took this course as an elective and it ended up being a nightmare. Too many group projects and his grading for assignments is just unreal. Super difficult to deal with and inconsiderate of other people. Awful prof in general do not take this class.
Worst professor that I've had at UBC. Extremely difficult marker and doesn't give clear direction. He's very one-sided with his beliefs. Constantly talks about how him and his wife aren't a traditional couple. Made me and others uncomfortable because there's nothing wrong with wanting a "traditional" marriage or wanting to conform to gender roles.
Nice guy but bad teacher. Does not clearly explain anything. Just rambles on about his personal life during lectures and uses random examples to explain course concepts. He argues that learning is a process that should done as an individual, implying that we have to teach ourselves and justifying his lack of teaching. Also he is very judgmental.
While preaching traditional, pre-globalized socialism; in practice he's a hyperindividualist with education and social interaction (for the sake of his own "freedom"), looking through the most critical of theories. He's blinded and deluded by ideas, but doesn't consider real life and actual solutions to issues. Even moreso if it impacts students
Doesn't tell you what he wants but he wants verrrry specific things. Opinionated. Not boring at least
I really struggled in his class especially since it is my first year. He is a tough grader because he believes we should struggle at first but doesn't back up clearly why we deserve such marks. It feels like you can never be right in this class unless you have ideology which was something most of the people in my class struggled with.
This class was very unrewarding. I consistently went to office hours, asked questions, attended every class and discussion and spent hours on papers but was graded harshly. The professor did not give good feedback and never answered simple yes/no questions. The prof was often patronizing when students participated in lectures or asked questions.
Honestly I always like Neil until I took this course. I felt extremely targeted in class and he seems to be extremely selective in who he wants to engage with. he sends passive aggressive emails if you do not attend class without giving you a chance to explain. The way he's very aggressive about it is off putting.
Drop while you can lol. I loved him until this class. It's all just race theory, rejecting empiricism/positionality (claiming it's colonial. well, so is his teaching and human existence). Ignores/supports ALL other issues (e.g. C4A students, gender/sexuality, toxicity, work life balance, tech, teaching methods). Reinforces capitalist power dynamics
Very good instructor but I found him arrogant and hard to approach. His feedback is very vague but marks very harshly. Really likes talking about himself, I think I know more about his personal life than the course content. Insists on you buying the paper textbook but online works just fine.
Happy St. Patty's. But what's a clover when I had bad luck being in this class. Had to drink away to keep afloat
I took soci224 persoal life. One of my easiest classes. Open book exam, free 1 week extension for the final paper, you can get feedback on answers for midterm questions before going in. However, this also means they're a difficult marker. Lectures are sometimes ranty, but I find it helps with understanding concepts.
Here me out...I can see why some people have their reservations. But give him a chance and his perspective will teach you a lot about life. Would 100% take a class with him again.
Funny and engaging, genuinely cares about your learning. May not be for everyone as his approach is different from most ubc professors, but that's what I like about him! I'm incredibly anxious person, and he still was able to bring me out of my shell. Safe to say he changed my entire perspective on learning. Attendance not required, but recommended
Had us keep a physical notebook to write responses to both in and out of class so that we could get feedback on it and use as reference for our exams. Really helpful in my opinion and reflects actual learning. Not really a casual course - only take it if you have genuine interest!
Neil uses personal examples and humour to help explain core concepts of the course, and this was really helpful. He made us journal in a book every week and we had the opportunity to have him read it and give advice for our exams. Neil is accessible outside of class and truly cares about his students. Pay attention in class if you want to do well!
I usually can't focus to save my life, but Neil manages to lecture like a conversation. That is- if you participate. His lectures were incredibly applicable and interesting, and while the actual learned material may not be as tangible, you gain a lot in ways of thinking and perspectives. If nothing else, he is quite the entertainer.
Neil is an amazing prof and he brought a wealth of knowledge & humour to the classroom. He always has great anecdotes to share about his experience with education. The class requires participation, but he made it a comfortable environment to share. He cares about his students, he even took a photo of me crossing the stage during graduation!
He is a great passionate professor, is easy talking to him, and gives great lectures. The content is interesting and he has a very fun personality. It was a pleasure taking this class. Always very fun and engaging.
He makes his powerpoint slides like 1200 words per slide, and he takes 30minutes yapping about a concept that'd take other profs probably max 10 minutes to teach. He went over time a lot so I don't recommend putting a course right after his.
Interesting class but the way he spoke to students was hostile and unprofessional. Grading was NOT constructive, just rude. All u learn about is him, nothing useful. He also cares too much about what students think of him, peaked in uni vibe. do whatever approach to assignments, but grades like there's a secret rubric.
Neil is the GOAT! I have a hard time focussing in lectures but Neil made it so entertaining that I genuinely cared, and looked forward to going! Office hours were always helpful, and midterms were almost identical to activities we did in class, that had opportunity to get feedback on prior to exam. Will take as many of Neil's classes that I can!
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
36%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
-0.16 avg changeRatings by Course
SOCI365
5.0
(1)SOCI100
4.7
(6)SOCI224
4.5
(4)SOCI200
3.9
(10)SOCI240
3.2
(12)Difficulty by Course
SOCI466
4.4
SOCI361
3.7
SOCI200
3.0
SOCI102
3.0
SOC102
3.0