1.8

Nicholas Passell

Mathematics - University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

1.8
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
114
Reviews
1.8
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
1.9
Helpful
1.7
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

114

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

2

4

13

3

13

2

33

1

53

What Students Say

Nicholas Passell isn't the greatest teacher to say the least

MATH112 - 1.0 rating

This proff is the worst proff I've had a Uni so far

MATH113 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 1 reported grades
B+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.18 avg change
Nov
Feb
May
Dec
Apr
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ABSTRACT

5.0

(1)

LINEAALG

4.0

(1)

MATH324

2.5

(2)

MATH106

2.5

(22)

MATH114

2.3

(4)
+13 more courses
Difficulty by Course

MATH000

5.0

MATH216

5.0

MATH246

5.0

MATH113

4.8

MATH114

4.5

Reviews (114)
3.0
3.0
MATH112
Jan 26, 2002

No Comments

5.0
4.0
ABSTRACT
Jul 3, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
MATH112
Oct 21, 2003

He's extremely intellegant, goes off on tangents all the time, but not all that great of a professor. Too smart to effectivly relay the information to students. Quite a character though.

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Oct 23, 2003

Very "out there", spends too much time giving a math history lesson. Try to choose a different prof.

2.0
2.0
MATH215
Dec 13, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
MATH112
Jan 1, 2004

HE IS NEVER AROUND

3.0
3.0
MATH112
Apr 6, 2004

he always goes off on tangents about nothing, and goes over the information too quickly. I did well in the class, but I know a lot of people who didn't. He is a nice man, he just isn't a good professor

1.0
3.0
MATH110
Apr 19, 2004

This guy really needs to learn how to teach. His brain has rotted so much that his mind is distorted. He thinks that teaching means telling us about the Roman Empire and how he needed to shovel that previous morning. NO MORE PASSELL!!!!

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Apr 19, 2004

Doesn't explain things clearly, get a history lesson instead of a math lesson

1.0
4.0
MATH112
Apr 27, 2004

Does not explain material relevant to what's on the homework. I had to drop the class because I was doing terrible, and I'm good at math. Started in the middle of the text book instead of the beginning. AVOID IF YOU CAN!

1.0
4.0
MATH112
Apr 27, 2004

If you want to teach yourself math from the book take this professor. He is concerned with proving why things are the way they are rather than teaching HOW to use them. I am recieving a good grade in his class due to hours of studying!! DONT TAKE

1.0
4.0
MATH112
May 5, 2004

This guy is the worst, you can try teaching yourself but he tests you on the ways that he wants you to learn it, not what the book recommends. Cnat read his writing, and he doesnt even talk about math, very low test scores, average = 30%

4.0
3.0
MATH112
May 18, 2004

You can't read his writing. He goes off on tangents about all kinds of stupid things. He doesn't teach you he just writes stuff on the board and expects you to learn it. His tests are very difficult. He insults students when no one knows answer.

1.0
5.0
MATH000
May 21, 2004

No Comments

3.0
4.0
MATH110
Sep 2, 2004

Stay as far away from this professor that you can. He will eat you up and spit you out.

2.0
5.0
MATH112
Sep 16, 2004

No Comments

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Sep 29, 2004

He's a very smart man, but he is not a very good professor. It's very hard to follow what he is teaching in class. If you have him, be expected to do a lot of out of class studying if you want to get a decent grade.

2.0
4.0
MATH215
Oct 11, 2004

Smart man--bad teacher. Hard to understand his logic, and what he thought was a piece of cake needed more slow teaching and help for his students. He's also very proud of his accomplishments.

3.0
3.0
MATH112
Oct 22, 2004

very smart man, however likes to talk about "interesting" things before class time...i never pay any attention in his class and learn everything out of my book and am getting a decent grade...but don't recommend him to people who can't learn math on their own

1.0
4.0
MATH112
Nov 2, 2004

Hard to learn from, learn all on your own. Doesn't know how to teach and talks about random things all the time.

2.0
4.0
MATH215
Nov 3, 2004

Well unless you liked being called an idiot in class then go ahead and take him. I was thinking about having a minor in math until I met him. He turns you off to math completely

3.0
4.0
MATH215
Nov 15, 2004

Yet another of the numerous classes in which you must teach yourself. Plus side tho, if you can read and understand the book before you come into the class then you can understand him alot easier. And he will do every problem thats on the test on the blackboard at some point in the course.

1.0
3.0
MATH110
Nov 17, 2004

HE IS A VERY BAD TEACHER. DO NOT TAKE HIM. HE ATTACKS PEOPLE AND DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT ASKING ABOUT YOUR TEST.

1.0
4.0
MATH
Dec 8, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Dec 14, 2004

Horrible professor. Very intelligent man, who belittles others. He may be a good upper level teacher but is not a very good teacher for pre-calc.

1.0
5.0
MATH110
Jan 10, 2005

The man does not help

2.0
4.0
CALC2
Grade: B+
Jan 26, 2005

Likes to tell long, boring, pointless stories - usually about Euler... He's really smart and can do mathematics very well, but he just can't teach it...

2.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 5, 2005

He doesn't do a very good job of teaching the material. He just made me more confused. He expects you to solve the problems on the test the way he does it, even if your way is right. This is hard since you can't understand what hes doing. He does try hard to help you though.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 14, 2005

I am finishing up my 4th semester here at Eau Claire and this prof was in my first. Everything previously posted is 100% correct. I ended up dropping the class and changing major's. It took me awhile to realize teachers with this caliber of suckiness are not the status quo.

1.0
4.0
MATH111
May 11, 2005

the worst of the worst, he is a chauvinist pig especially if you are female, stay away, i dropped in 2 days, couldn't stand his attitude!

1.0
4.0
MATH106
Sep 11, 2005

Pretty sure I dropped this class ALREADY because I don't like his style of teaching. He goes off on random tangents, that have NOTHING to do with math. He talked about Chinese food for half the period yesterday. I need a professor that can actually get me to learn something. Pretty sure he hasn't done that. If any of you are considering taking Math 106, do all you can to avoid getting Passell. That is, if you'd like to have a good math experience. peace out ad have a nice life. Later ya'll

4.0
2.0
MATH106
Oct 11, 2005

I love him. I have no idea what happened with all the other raters, he is a very interesting man, and has always been helpful and nice to me.

4.0
3.0
MATH215
Oct 16, 2005

Dr. Passell is a really nice guy, but he isn't that great of a teacher. His lectures are often hard to follow, but you can usually get down the main points. It's a good idea to do the homework, and he is extremely willing to help you out if you ever have any questions. His sense of humor is a bit dry, but he can be very funny at times.

4.0
2.0
MATH106
Nov 3, 2005

Math 106 is a thinking class, not really math problems just how to use math in the real world. When goes on his little talks about China or whatever its to get students thinking about math. Do what you can to get him, pretty easy grading on very easy tests.

2.0
2.0
MATH215
Nov 29, 2005

I am a math major and got a 5 on my AP test my senior year. Coming in as a freshman I was confused from the start. He just proved formulas and rambled on. I was about to change my major then I switched teachers and it got a lot better. He is very smart but shouldn't be teaching. Don't take him!

1.0
1.0
MATH106
Dec 6, 2005

bad bad bad

3.0
4.0
MATH112
Feb 7, 2006

I dropped in a week and am not taking it again until there is a new prof. teaching it. He's nice, but just way too confusing, only way youll learn is teaching your self out of text.

1.0
3.0
MATH112
Feb 24, 2006

1 word to desribe this prof= HORRIBLE!

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Mar 3, 2006

he's a horrible teacher, doesn't know how to teach and gives problems on tests and quizes that everyone in the class gets wrong adn then thinks that they are neat. i don't recommend him at all.

2.0
3.0
MATH106
Mar 3, 2006

It was supposed to be an easy math class, but it was like teaching math to myself. Actually I didn't learn anything from the class. The tests came out of nowhere and all he does is talk about anything that isn't math. You could never go and prolly still get a B, but just don't take him, you'll regret it.

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Mar 29, 2006

Brilliant mathmatician, terrible teacher. Not recommended for lower level courses.

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Apr 4, 2006

Worst teacher ever, unless you wanna learn about stupid side facts that take up the entire hour, teaches as if you're a senior genius, im retaking it to help my first grade and i have a C

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Apr 19, 2006

Stay Away! Absolutly briliant man, bad teacher. He basicaly turns and faces a blackboard and talks mumbo jumbo. I had a Moderate level of intrest comeing in, I thought it would be a cake walk having HS pre calc. I got an A in that class. If I get a C I will jump for joy. The first test i got a 90 on (review). the last test 30. What a Joke.

2.0
4.0
324LINEAR
Apr 22, 2006

The man's a genius, but he can't teach. I think he should be teaching grad students. He's very nice and occasionally has funny comments, but overall is a pretty poor teacher...especially for linear algebra. He'll try to help you, but it usually ends up just being more confusing. Nice guy, but I'd take a different prof.

2.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 25, 2006

This professor is the worst ever if you think you know what your doing good luck because his test are horrible. He doesn't teach what is going on very clear and you have to try to teach yourself. He likes to talk about intelligent mathematicians a lot. I would of took a class about that if I wanted to know about it. Good Luck with him if take him.

2.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 27, 2006

Strays off track very often... Doesn't help with your questions and his tests are rediculous. Be prepared to teach yourself all the material, and maybe even going to outside resources to know all you need to know.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
May 15, 2006

Not helpful at all... Rambles about things that have little to do with the material. Tests are rediculously difficult because he isn't teaching you.

1.0
3.0
MATH112
May 16, 2006

NIGHTMARE of a prof. Does not teach - uses class as a soapbox for rambling about random nerdy topics that have nothing to do with math, and then sometimes does a homework problem. Everything (even tests!) is handwritten and he has unintelligible penmenship. Not at all helpful out of class. *DO NOT* TAKE THIS CLASS!

1.0
5.0
MATH324
Aug 31, 2006

Horrible beyond horrible! **** too. Three of us had the SAME EXACT answers on the same test and we got three different grades. You won't learn anything and will want to pull your hair out the entire semester. Wait and take it at a different time with a different prof.

2.0
1.0
MATH106
Nov 30, 2006

This class is completely worthless. It's a good class if you aren't a math major and just need to complete competency. The work isn't hard, there are no tests and basically you can skip several times as long as you turn in the homework. To get a B, you only have to do 80% of the assignments. An A requires extra credit, which is never really offered

1.0
3.0
MATH106
Jan 1, 2007

I think this man may be crazy! Take any other class but this one to get your math requirement. We honestly talked about nothing that will ever matter in real life. The last day of class we talked about fruit! DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!

1.0
1.0
MATH106
Jan 25, 2007

this man is ridiculous! i don't know how he graded us, since he had no clue who we were at the end of the semester and his basis was on attendance (not taken) and participation. he does not teach, just rambles. if you want a study hour for other classes, and just need it as a g.e., take this course as a S/U!

2.0
4.0
MATH112
Apr 25, 2007

Wow... I highly advise you not to take this man as a professor. If you do, prepare to teach yourself from the book. Takes about two weeks to get you back a quiz by then there will be an exam. Oh yea, he doesn't write very well, can't read his exams or his notes (if he teaches that day). Skips many steps, sort of confusing. Good luck if you get him

1.0
5.0
MATH113
May 2, 2007

This guy is absolutely terrible do not take him because you are just wasting your time, by far the worst professor/teacher I have ever had I am alright with math and this guy just confuses the crap out of you...in no way should you take this man's class' i dont know how he even got a job to be honest...

2.0
5.0
MATH215
Sep 23, 2007

Wow...what can I say. I study for 5 hours for a calc2 test just to find out its on applications we hadn't discussed yet. Useless. Constantly rips on Calculus I AP high school courses, when my high school AP calc teacher was 1000 times better.

5.0
2.0
MATH106
Nov 9, 2007

Amazing teacher

1.0
5.0
MATH216
Nov 12, 2007

This man can not teach! He constantly tells us that he is smarter then us. he stands if front of the board and writes, but you can't see it, then he will erase it. You never know when he is changing the chapters. His tests are impossible, they have nothing to do with anything in the book! Get Out Now! HORRIBLE!

2.0
3.0
MATH106
Nov 20, 2007

I honestly don't understand how this man is still teaching at this university. He fails to actually teach any material, let alone address math related issues in class - I specifically remember talking about tigers for one class period and ligers during the next. If you are actually wanting to take a MATH class, then consider other options.

1.0
5.0
MATH215
Dec 14, 2007

HORRIBLE, run away and avoid all of his classes. Learning must all be done on your own, all he does during class is talk about higher level math/physics problems that have no relevance to learning material. If you want to pass the class, find another teacher!

3.0
3.0
MATH215
Dec 18, 2007

Very smart man, fairly bad teacher. It is clear that he knows the material very well, he just isn't able to express it well.

1.0
5.0
MATH215
Feb 13, 2008

You would be just as well off if you bought at Calc book and sat in your room and read it yourself. He doesn't explain anything and just assumes that by seeing the answer to the problem, you will know how to do it. Talks to the blackboard and not the students. Worst educator I have ever seen. Talks about random stuff during lectures. Avoid him.

1.0
5.0
MATH215
Feb 18, 2008

Assumes that you know how to find the answer to the problem. Can't explain anything. Get a different Prof. if you can.

1.0
5.0
MATH246
Apr 21, 2008

I still have nightmares about his class which I took in the fall. He knows Calculus, no doubt about it, but there is one thing that he doesn't know...how to teach. You would really be just as well off if you taught yourself. The only thing Nick really seemed to accomplish in class was telling stories. He is also good at killing your GPA. Avoid!

1.0
5.0
MATH215
Apr 28, 2008

I thought I accidentally walked into a "math history" class, every single class period. Tangents about EULER get very old really fast. Genius of a prof, worthless as a teacher. RUN AWAY, GET OUT, GET OUT GET OUT! However, if you love reading math books and teacher yourself calculus, you make like the class....

1.0
5.0
MATH215
May 10, 2008

Terrible. Doesn't teach or follow the book. There isn't much homework and you don't have to show up though.

4.0
4.0
MATH215
Oct 13, 2008

He is a very smart and nice guy, but he's a horrible teacher. He doesn't always stay on topic, and his examples are hard to follow because he skips steps. He'd be okay for an easier class like calc one, but I wouldn't take him for calc 2.

1.0
5.0
MATH113
Nov 17, 2008

worst teacher i have ever had.

1.0
5.0
MATH113
Nov 19, 2008

worst teacher I've ever had.

1.0
5.0
MATH215
Dec 2, 2008

what can i say? horrible teacher. i dont recommend him, unless you want to fail.the highest grade you'll probably get is a C. and that is if you work your ass off! horrible!

4.0
2.0
MATH106
Dec 4, 2008

He is a very nice man....but you learn no math whatsoever. I loved listening to his stories though,he's quirky! You never have a test, but you can't get an A unless you participate in discussions (nothing to do with math) do ALL your homework, and have decent attendance.

1.0
2.0
MATH106
Dec 13, 2008

Worst professor ever. DON'T TAKE PASSELL!!! I learned absolutely nothing. I played sudoku during class because all he did was tell stories. Oh the agony! Escape while you can!

1.0
1.0
MATH106
Jan 4, 2009

Dr. Passell is the epitome of somebody past their prime. He is smart but has no knowledge of how to convey that intelligence. Instead of talking about math he'll talk about things he like such as WWII, interesting science, or his family. He like to give out A's even though the class is a joke.

1.0
1.0
MATH105
Jan 28, 2009

GET OUT GET OUT I had this professor for my 2nd semester and I couldnt stand him. Leraned nothing... well at least not by myself. All he talked about were stories, gave us text books, and I taught myself as well as I could.

3.0
1.0
MATH106
Feb 8, 2009

great class if you're a liberal arts major with no connection to math. learned no math but earned my GE credits required. i don't know if he knows any math, but doesn't matter if you just want an easy A.

2.0
5.0
MATH114
Apr 15, 2009

Terrible professor. I dont doubt that he is very smart, but he just cant teach calculus. Isnt the most clear. Assigns homework but doesnt collect it.

3.0
1.0
MATH106
Apr 15, 2009

This is not a class for math majors who prefer strategic, organized textbook assignments and tests. The course is designed for people who aren't intereseted in math but still need the credits. There are a few assignments and NO tests. Professor is very knowledgable on many subjects and generates interest.

2.0
3.0
MATH106
Apr 20, 2009

Passell's teaching style is just about what most of the comments on this site suggest. Quirky, careless, and HIS way...pretty much an educational failure. He's a good ol' boy, and doesn't give much care to the students' common understanding of subject matter.

2.0
5.0
MATH114
Apr 29, 2009

No Comments

1.0
5.0
MATH106
Jul 27, 2009

Worst professor ever. At all costs do not take him. You learn nothing and that is reflected in your grade. He is old and just needs to retire.

2.0
1.0
MATH106
Aug 4, 2009

math 106 was the biggest joke. He said that if you showed up, did your homework and wrote a good paper, you would stay at a B. I never went, wrote my final paper in two hours and slid it under his door and got an A in the class. Hmm...

4.0
1.0
MATH106
Oct 1, 2009

This proffesor is really passionate about his subject, and enjoys talking about many other things. He gets sidetracked easily. I'm sure if you are interested you could lean something, but most in math 106 are not. It is a "mathmatical appreciation" course.

4.0
1.0
MATH106
Oct 1, 2009

This proffesor is really passionate about his subject, and enjoys talking about many other things. He gets sidetracked easily. I'm sure if you are interested you could lean something, but most in math 106 are not. It is a "mathmatical appreciation" course.

4.0
1.0
MATH106
Oct 1, 2009

This proffesor is really passionate about his subject, and enjoys talking about many other things. He gets sidetracked easily. I'm sure if you are interested you could lean something, but most in math 106 are not. It is a "mathmatical appreciation" course.

3.0
4.0
MATH111
Oct 17, 2009

Dr. Passell isn't as bad as the comments make him out to be, at least not for Math 111. You will be learning from the textbook a lot, and it will take a while to figure out what he's going to ask on a quiz or test, but if you do the problems/readings he assigns and make note cards for each of the quizzes/tests, it's not too difficult to get a A.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Oct 31, 2009

Coming from somebody who is already fully educated on the subject, I can safely say Nicholas Passell is the worst teacher I have ever had. Makes the simplest of subjects horribly confusing, unresponsive and arrogant to questions, constantly weaves off subject, has unnecessarily hard tests. He's a smart guy, but an educational disaster. Avoid.

1.0
5.0
MATH111
Nov 4, 2009

Passell is easily the worst math teacher in history. I am already horrible at math and it did not help that he made every subject overly difficult and complicated. Not to mention that he got so far off topic during classes that his subjects of choice would become pop cans, jumping rhinos or the temperature in his attic. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
5.0
MATH114
Nov 17, 2009

If your math isn't solid, do not take him.. I had him for Pre-calc and he expects you to know where each number comes from.. If you're a visual learner and like to see where each number is coming from where, then don't take him..

4.0
3.0
MATH114
Dec 1, 2009

Passell seems to be love or hate. I hated, but looking back, I appreciate his teaching more than I did at the time. He is incredibly thorough about showing you everything that he is doing on the board, and able to answer questions. He does have stories, but often relate to what you are learning, which can be helpful. Under appreciated, but decent.

2.0
2.0
MATH111
Dec 14, 2009

Intelligent, impressive vocabulary, nice, can't teach math. He blazes through problems on the board with the assumption that we are all math majors. Doesn't explain what he's doing and skips complex steps. He is a nice guy and will work with you if you see him in office hours but I advise taking someone else. Plus side is he grades generously.

2.0
2.0
MATH106
Dec 22, 2009

I have such mixed feelings about this class. On the pro side, attendance is not at all mandatory and there are zero tests/quizzes. On the con side, the directions for the few assignments (including the final paper) are incredibly unclear, and he isn't very reachable by email. I'd say go for it if you're only taking it to get your math credit!

2.0
4.0
MATH111
Jan 24, 2010

He is very intelligent, his vocabulary is impressive, he knows a lot of trivial facts and theories, he even really knows his mathematics. Unfortunately he lacks the ability to teach math to his students. He isn't clear, he doesn't explain what he is doing on the board, races through problems and expects you to keep up. Nice guy, can't teach.

1.0
5.0
MATH113
Feb 9, 2010

This Professor is easily the worst teacher on the Uwec Campus. makes simple ideas insanely complicated. I had already taken Precalc in High school, but i was still lost in this class. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
3.0
MATH112
Mar 25, 2010

Nicholas Passell isn't the greatest teacher to say the least. He mumbles, stands in front of his work, and teaches useless fact. He thinks he's a doctor because his wife is, he doesn't go a day without mentioning physics or calculus when he is teaching pre-calc! Bright note-he does give extra credit quizzes sometimes

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 12, 2010

Passell is by far the worst professor at UWEC. He stands in front of his work so you cant se what he's talking about, he mumbles, is very sloppy on the board, and his tests and quizzes are not what he talks about in class. He talks about useless information daily that does not pertain to the class. Do not take this class if you care abour your GPA!

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 12, 2010

Passell is by far the worst professor at UWEC. He stands in front of his work so you cant se what he's talking about, he mumbles, is very sloppy on the board, and his tests and quizzes are not what he talks about in class. He talks about useless information daily that does not pertain to the class. Do not take this class if you care abour your GPA!

2.0
3.0
MATH112
Apr 14, 2010

Nicholas Passell is the worst teacher of all time.

2.0
5.0
MATH113
Apr 15, 2010

He knows what he's teaching. Unfortunately, you don't and he's not good at fixing that. The class may or may not be hard, it depends on how much you can learn from the textbook, not from him.

4.0
3.0
MATH324
Apr 20, 2010

I had him for linear algebra. It was a while ago, take my ratings above with a grain of salt. I'll say this though. He got me interested. He got me excited in the subject. It's probably because of this class and him that I'm going back to school to finish my bachelors in math and get a phd.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 28, 2010

Do not take Nicholas Passell. He is by far the worst teacher I've had. The man is smart and knows a lot about everything under the sun but uses backwards methods of teaching. Constantly refers to how the people of the past are smarter than his current class. Creates his own methods that he calls the "Passell" doctrine. Warning- Don't take him.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 28, 2010

Additional info: He handwrites his tests and quizzes in illegible cursive writing which he expects you to decode as you take the test/quiz.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Apr 28, 2010

Not very clear. Test are hand written and he has bad hand writing.

1.0
5.0
MATH113
Apr 29, 2010

This professor is by far the worst teacher I have yet come across at UWEC. He handwrites all tests and quizzes. In my class we two tests and two quizzes. Along with those he graded maybe three homework assignments. Basically this meant if you had trouble in the beginning of the class you were screwed. Avoid this class if at all possible!

2.0
5.0
MATH113
May 12, 2010

Avoid! He doesn't explain anything well at all, and what he does explain doesn't seem to make any sense. I read the book and taught myself all the content. You may as well not go to class and just read the book. He goes off on random tangents that mean absolutely nothing.

2.0
3.0
MATH112
Oct 6, 2010

Does not answer questions, doesn't teach the way I learned PreCalculus in high school. We mostly teach ourselves out of the book. Do your best to avoid this if Math isn't your thing.

3.0
5.0
MATH113
Nov 19, 2010

Okay, I'm going to be completely honest. This proff is the worst proff I've had a Uni so far. He goes off on tangents that don't mean a thing. He handwrites the quizzes and tests (the only things you're graded on) in his messy cursive. He doesn't teach well and makes his tests and quizzes extremely hard. He is helpful if you take the time

1.0
5.0
MATH113
Nov 20, 2010

TERRIBLE!! I actually dropped out of his class and still have to take it, i will try with all my might not to take it with him again!

3.0
4.0
MATH112
Nov 30, 2010

If you like learning random crap during a math class...take this! He goes on and on about random information about Gauss all the time! Half of the time is actual math you need to know for his horribly cursive handwritten tests/quizzes and the other half is math history. He is extremely intelligent, but can get annoying with too much information.

1.0
5.0
MATH112
Feb 22, 2011

WORST TEACHER ON CAMPUS BY FAR! I am not kidding. this class should be classifies under history, not math. he talks about random uselass facts. plus he has really bad cursive writing so its impossible to take good notes, his quizzes and tests are also done in this bad writing. I took math 114 after this class and did great, avoid at all costs!!!!

1.0
4.0
MATH112
May 6, 2011

Avoid at all costs. He rarely provides necessary help or application, and instead, he tangents into math history or something random, like dolphins. If you are prepared to teach yourself pre-calculus, by all means, take this class. Mathzone is a better teacher than this professor.

1.0
5.0
MATH113
May 10, 2011

one of the worst teachers i have ever had, your going to have to teach yourself the course or you wont learn it at all

1.0
3.0
MATH215
Dec 2, 2011

I had this tool back in the early 90's and he was horrible then.. some things never change.. retook CalcII because of his lack of teaching.

2.0
4.0
MATH115
Dec 30, 2011

Tests and quizes are hand written and difficult to read. He has some interesting stories but they are rarely pertinent to what you're learning. He actually suggested I get boys from the class to help me learn to material because I'm an "attractive girl". I suggest going to Math Lab or learning from the book instead of going to class everyday.

4.0
4.0
LINEAALG
Apr 7, 2012

If you love math, Nick is great. If you are only taking the class because you have to, avoid. But he is truly brilliant, and you can learn a lot if you want to.

1.0
3.0
MATH113
Sep 30, 2013

Do not take trig with this guy. He is hard to understand. His writing is terrible; his cos looks like sin, as if trig is not hard already to understand. Expect to learn nothing from class and expect to teach yourself everything.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 1 reported grades
B+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.18 avg change
Nov
Feb
May
Dec
Apr
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ABSTRACT

5.0

(1)

LINEAALG

4.0

(1)

MATH324

2.5

(2)

MATH106

2.5

(22)

MATH114

2.3

(4)
+13 more courses
Difficulty by Course

MATH000

5.0

MATH216

5.0

MATH246

5.0

MATH113

4.8

MATH114

4.5

Similar Professors