2.1

Nils Clausson

English - University of Regina

2.1
Quality
4.4
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
94
Reviews
2.1
Quality
4.4
Difficulty
2.2
Helpful
2.1
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

94

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
94 total ratings

5

5

4

16

3

13

2

29

1

31

What Students Say

Hypocrisy and close minded arrogance are not something a student has to put up with

ENG101 - 1.0 rating

Can't teach worth a damn

ENGL110 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

65% confidence
Based on 5 grades
Most common grades:
A- (2)
B- (2)
C+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 5 reported grades
A-: 2
B-: 2
C+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.10 avg change
Mar
Oct
Mar
Nov
Mar
Jul
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGL

4.0

(1)

ENGL399

4.0

(1)

ENGL260

4.0

(1)

ENGL475

4.0

(1)

ENGLISH100

3.5

(2)
+20 more courses
Difficulty by Course

110

5.0

ENG270

5.0

ENG101

5.0

ENGL

5.0

024

5.0

Reviews (93)
1.0
4.0
ENGL110
Feb 6, 2002

Can't teach worth a damn.

1.0
5.0
ENGL100
Grade: A-
Feb 6, 2002

horrible class. marks WAY too hard

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Grade: B-
Feb 8, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ENG110
Feb 10, 2002

talks more about unrelated topics that about the class topics

1.0
4.0
ENG
Feb 11, 2002

He has absolutely no idea of how to mark a paper accurately.

4.0
3.0
ENG110
Feb 14, 2002

I didn't think he was that bad.

2.0
5.0
ENGL100
Feb 18, 2002

Unbelievably strict. Expects nothing less than perfection and marks accordingly.

1.0
5.0
ENGL110
Feb 24, 2002

Quit expecting 110 students to write papers worthy of being published

5.0
4.0
ENG100
Mar 9, 2002

Hard marker, but helped me to do my best.

1.0
4.0
ENGL100
Mar 26, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
ENG110
Mar 27, 2002

poor student/teacher relations, not helpful outside of class

3.0
3.0
ENG100
Mar 27, 2002

way to condescending - invites questions and then insults you for 20 minutes

4.0
3.0
ENGL100
May 29, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ENG
Grade: A-
Jul 7, 2002

I don`t know how he sleeps at night.....

1.0
5.0
ENG270
Jul 23, 2002

No Comments

1.0
4.0
ENGL110
Aug 6, 2002

Watch out! Even honour roll students will suffer!

1.0
5.0
ENGL270
Aug 25, 2002

VERY Hard. Cannot teach.

1.0
5.0
ENGL270
Sep 3, 2002

He is so stuck on himself that no simple student could ever be smart enough.

2.0
5.0
ENG270
Sep 5, 2002

Way too difficult;expects students to write scholarly papers--ridiculous!!!

1.0
5.0
ENG270
Grade: C+
Sep 18, 2002

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Oct 4, 2002

impossible to do well in

1.0
5.0
ENG101
Grade: B-
Oct 22, 2002

Nothing Is good enough

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Oct 22, 2002

Worst Teacher Ever

2.0
5.0
100
Oct 30, 2002

Even English majors fail english 100 with him

4.0
5.0
ENGL
Oct 31, 2002

The Grim Reaper of English

4.0
5.0
ENG110
Nov 6, 2002

prithee I pray you, have mercy!

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Nov 7, 2002

He probably likes being told he is a hard teacher

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Nov 24, 2002

He doesnt want anyone to succeed... worst teacher ever, no personality, no help

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Nov 26, 2002

Treats class horribly, he's rude, condescending, talks about irrelivant stuff

4.0
3.0
ENGL110
Dec 1, 2002

expects a lot from students, interested in subject matter

4.0
4.0
100
Dec 6, 2002

i did better in his english class than i did in high school.

4.0
4.0
ENG110
Dec 10, 2002

The only people who hate this guy are the lazy-asses who hate working for marks

2.0
5.0
024
Dec 11, 2002

look for a different English prof for your money

3.0
5.0
100
Dec 13, 2002

Boring, over use of hand gestures and hard marker. Proof read lots.

3.0
2.0
ENG100
Dec 16, 2002

I never studied,i wrote my essays the night before, i did great in his class

1.0
5.0
100
Jan 5, 2003

This prof sucks the big one! He really really really sucks!!

2.0
4.0
ENG110
Jan 6, 2003

Very dry personality. He actually missed our final and I'm not sure why.

4.0
4.0
ENGL100
Jan 8, 2003

knows his stuff, but VERY hard marker

4.0
4.0
ENGL270
Feb 18, 2003

Kinda difficult to listen to (stutter), but all in all not a bad guy!

1.0
5.0
ENGISH100
Oct 21, 2003

Who says this guy knows his stuff? He teaches english 100 - there's nothing to know!

3.0
4.0
ENG110
Nov 4, 2003

I thought that he was a very hard marker. I found that he also was not clear on essay expectations. Our class topic was pretty interesting but there was alot of work.

2.0
5.0
110
Nov 13, 2003

Probably the worst proff i have ever had..he is very boring...and i would NOT suggest taking a class from him AT ALL!!

3.0
3.0
ENGLISH
Dec 11, 2003

He is passionate about english. He can get off topic very easy. He did offer alot of comments on essay.

3.0
4.0
ENG100
Dec 23, 2003

Classes were basically useless to go to. You could probably do the essays from what you learned in highschool and stil get the same mark as if you went to class.

3.0
5.0
ENG100
May 4, 2004

Very passionate about English, but VERY hard marker and he is hard and boring to listen to.

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Sep 2, 2004

Ugh. Horrid man. I mean, I did pretty well in the class, but that's only because I had so much experience with essay's PRIOR to taking the class. Horribly boring. Hard marker. Wouldn't take another class from him.

3.0
5.0
ENG100
Sep 29, 2004

He's an unreasonably tough marker and quite strange. I am a professional writer and he gave my essay a bare passing mark. I wish I had known this before the drop deadline, he is ruining my gpa. However, he -is- passionate about english and very nice.

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Oct 1, 2004

He rambles constintly, and does not answer questions clearly. He runs around the subject before giving you a one word answer. Most of what he talks about has nothing to do with English, and he does not stick with the syllabus he hands out.

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Oct 1, 2004

I don't know WHY you ppl are criticizing Dr Clausson so much!! True, he's tough and expects a lot from his students, but he is also very friendly if you ask for help. I like his lectures, cuz he is always cheerful and seems very smart. He's a good prof!

1.0
4.0
ENG100
Nov 16, 2004

i'd suggest a different prof. for most first year students taking english 100!

5.0
3.0
ENGLISH100
Nov 23, 2004

Those students who've given Dr. Clausson bad ratings are all complainers & probably lazy. Yes, he marks hard, but he's also an excellent professor with high standards. His lectures are great, extremly well organized and full of interesting ideas. I WOULD take another class from him, in a minute.

1.0
4.0
ENG100
Nov 26, 2004

To the person below. Go ahead and take another class from him, if you can understand what he talks about, then I worry that there are more like him.

4.0
5.0
ENG100
Dec 1, 2004

Dr. C's marking is tough, but his feedback is dead-on. I used to get 70's on my essays (in other classes) but thanks to his brutal discipline, I am now getting high 90's. You won't like him if you are lazy. But if you want to become an awesome writer and scholar, take his class. You won't regret it.

2.0
5.0
ENG101
Dec 17, 2004

Bad teacher, marks hard

2.0
4.0
ENGLISH100
Mar 22, 2005

He was terribly hard to follow and talked about things that had nothing to do with the class or the readings. He is also a very hard marker and very boring to listen to.

4.0
4.0
ENGL399
Jun 26, 2005

I didn't like this class, but he taught the material as well anyone could, in my opinion. He's the only English instructor to not give me an A on a paper, but I didn't deserve one.

3.0
3.0
ENGL100
Jul 17, 2005

He was a very nice prof and rather helpful, very easy to talk with..... but he marked extremely hard.... I had to work damn hard to get my final high 60 mark. A lot of assignments too... 1, 2 or even one time 3 essays due in one week... if you are prepared to work you ass off, then take his class

4.0
4.0
ENGL260
Feb 9, 2006

Nice guy, a bit absent-minded, but very thorough. Started off the class with okay marks, worked my ass off and finally received an A, so it's not as if he's *too* tough.

2.0
5.0
ENGL212
Aug 16, 2006

Terrible prof. Stutter, no class discussion, very boring. Had 2 essay topics for essay on Romanticism. Both were on an author who had very little to do with the period. Marks incredibly hard. Cannot deviate from his ruberick of what a paper should look like. I have taken 300 levels and gotten better marks! First years - BEWARE!

1.0
5.0
ENGL212
Aug 31, 2006

This professor is the worst! He is avoidant and unclear. I missed his final due to unforseen circumstances, and he avoided all my emails and phone calls as I tried desperately to get in touch with him. HE RUINED MY GPA! This is totally unacceptable. Learn to teach. Don't take his class if you can avoid it, you'll regret it!

2.0
5.0
ENGL110
Oct 6, 2006

Extremely hard marker. Perhaps the most annoying voice ever - I still hear it in my nightmares.

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Oct 22, 2006

Attending his classes you will find everything that is awful about school. He is the most boring, unfocused, and hardest marker you will come by. Get out if you can!

1.0
4.0
ENG100
Nov 17, 2006

Very boring, constantly speaks in metaphors.He has the tendency to get off topic and go off about ?????. He marks very HARD. If you have any problems with grammar , do not take his class. If you get a 60 or 65 in his class you are doing excellent. Warning....find another prof.I wish I had.

2.0
4.0
ENGL100
Nov 17, 2006

Is obviously very intelligent but he expects too much from his students. The order of his sylabys should be rearranged. It would be more helpful if he taught essay composition ect at the start of the semester. Boring!!

1.0
4.0
ENG100
Nov 23, 2006

WORST PROF EVER!!!!! Constantly went off topic talking about random things that weren't relevant to anything. It is so BORING!! He expects that students know everything about english when they start the class, which is why he marks super hard. If you pull of a 60% in the class that is amazing. DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS!!! I wish i had known not to!

1.0
5.0
ENGLI110
Nov 23, 2006

Very hard marker on essays, not helpful at all. Grade average very low

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Nov 30, 2006

Big mistake to pick this professor, even if essays are grammatically flawless and written well you will still have a very hard time pulling off an A.

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Dec 1, 2006

Hard to understand he stutters alot!! Super hard marker. His lectures are boring and even if you do spend alot of time on your essay you won't do good. Exams are hard. Please find another prof, even change ur schedule if you have to!

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Dec 5, 2006

To bad I cant rate this guy a zero because he doesn't deserve a 1 in any category. Don't take his courses.

4.0
3.0
ENGL222
Jan 17, 2007

When I saw the ratings for this prof, I was kind of scared, but I decided to see for myself what he was like. Let me be the first to say that these bad ratings are WRONG!!! The prof is passionate for his subject, doesn't stutter, and seems very approachable. Figure out what profs you like for yourself! Don't follow the 100 level ratings!

3.0
4.0
ENGL212
Mar 23, 2007

Good prof because he knows what he is teaching, and after you write the first essay, it is very clear what he expects ont he next essays...your very best. Don't try to write night before essays,believe me, they don't work. If you ask for help and take in a rough draft, you'll get some helpful feedback.

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Apr 5, 2007

I DROPPED HIS CLASS. NOW I ONLY WANNA TO SAY HE SUCKS!!!

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Sep 20, 2007

If you can help it DO NOT sign up to be in this profs. class he is a horrible teacher and very hard marker which is relected in you marks. Expect at least 10% lower grad in his class as compared to other english classes.

3.0
5.0
ENG100
Oct 22, 2007

A nice enough guy but a hard course. Be prepared to hand in an essay the second week of classes and every two weeks afterwards. He is helpful to go talk to. A VERY hard marker. Most will fail the first essay. Very hard to please. Learned a lot about writing essays. Watch out first years.

2.0
5.0
ENGL222
Nov 1, 2007

He only asked rhetorical or irrelevant questions, and then would pause for an obscene amount of time before someone took pity and answered. He got off track easily, but instead of being amusing, it became infuriating. He's a very difficult marker, even though his course was so basic and simple that I wanted to strangle myself to escape the madness.

4.0
3.0
ENGL475
Dec 17, 2007

Expects well argued papers, and rewards such with good grades. Very willing to help you edit, and very receptive to unique essay proposals/ideas. Comes across as a bit pompous and tends to dominate class lectures, but never unfriendly. Lectures are a bit haphazard, but chock full of information. The trick is to digest it all before finals.

1.0
5.0
ENG270
Dec 11, 2008

This man should be a hipnotist, his voice can put anyone to sleep within seconds. Expect grades at least 10% lower than you would recieve from any other prof.

2.0
4.0
ENG110
Apr 21, 2009

Detective fiction is his personal interest, so 110 wasn't a bad class. All the same, though, some parts of the final seemed bizarre, and final exam essay topics were very specific despite not being able to bring the textbook to the exam. Requires clear memory of most short stories read during the semester. I neither recommend nor warn against it.

3.0
5.0
ENG212
Aug 16, 2009

He often quotes himself. Gets off topic. Contradicts himself, marks boarderline unfairly. Is brilliant but should not be teaching. Class felt like cruel unusual torture. Expects extreme memorization.

5.0
5.0
ENG100
Nov 26, 2009

Wow, Dr.C is tough but, when its all said and done you will be a better writer. Essays, lots of essays and then there will be more essays. I worked really hard at first, then quit working hard and got roughly the same marks. Hard as hell but, I enjoyed the class.

1.0
5.0
ENGL100
Dec 19, 2009

He would wander around stumbling and mumble about various topics unrelated to the class. He announced on the first day that nobody in the class would get higher than a 70 in the class and over 50% of the class failed the first essay. If I could go back in time I would change my schedule to avoid him for sure.

2.0
3.0
ENG100
Jan 7, 2010

He was a pompous, jerk. He rambles and likes to make you feel stupid. He had us buy a textbook that was not the same as his. Has no use for differing opinions or writing styles, so when writing, try to stick to a very structured way. I passed this class with a sixty doing the minimal amount of work and studying for the final for only a couple of ho

3.0
5.0
ENG221
Mar 5, 2010

Knowledgeable but a bad teacher. His essays (so far) have had one right and answer - if you don't reiterate his opinion, you do poorly. Extremely boring lectures.

2.0
5.0
ENGL110
Mar 19, 2010

class was super boring, super hard marker, didn't give clear feedback on essays, high expectations for a 100 level class. i would not take a class from him again!!!

1.0
5.0
ENG110
Apr 23, 2010

Caution!!! all First year Students. I am not sure how is he Teaching a higher level. but he is way too much for a 100 level class. so my request to all first year students are to Avoid HIM. you will be doing the greatest favor on your self. I agree with every one. still wanted to let my Voice out. and i request from all new student to Avoid Him

2.0
4.0
ENG100
Jun 8, 2010

Talked alot, very boring to listen to. Hard marker

4.0
2.0
ENGL100
Mar 9, 2011

While he does tend to ramble, and you may hate him during first year, I love this man. He is the reason I get such good marks on my essays now. You'll learn a lot from him. Plus, he's kinda funny and cute (puppy dog type) in an older gentleman way.

1.0
5.0
ENG101
Oct 14, 2011

Totally incompetent. Incredible audacity, clearly did not even take the time to read good essays unless they are what he personally liked. Corrects grammatically correct sentences, changes words to his taste, instead of taking the time to absorb interesting ideas. Hypocrisy and close minded arrogance are not something a student has to put up with

4.0
5.0
ENG110
Oct 30, 2011

Dr. Clausson is obviously an extremely intelligent man, which leads to some of his off-topic tangents about lesser topics. However, those of you who were too busy crying ask for help missed out on the fact that if you show initiative and meet with him. He's very helpful.

5.0
5.0
ENG100
Mar 7, 2012

This professor will remain imprinted in your memory for the rest of your life if only you take the time to listen.

2.0
5.0
ENG223
Nov 30, 2012

Often just reads from essays that he has written or from others. Very little discussion and interaction. He can never make up his mind about what he wants on essays. Is a very hard marker and doesn't allow you any room for improvement. This is my second class with him and I don't recommend it.

2.0
4.0
ENG111
Mar 15, 2013

Long story short... bad prof. University of Regina hiring officials, you should be ashamed of yourself.

2.0
4.0
ENG223
Jul 22, 2013

I went into this class expecting great things and was very disappointed. His lectures weren't organized, nor were they clear to the students. His grading is scattered and throughout the course, myself, along with some other classmates were unsure of his expectations on essays. Get him to clarify things if you're unsure!

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

65% confidence
Based on 5 grades
Most common grades:
A- (2)
B- (2)
C+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 5 reported grades
A-: 2
B-: 2
C+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.10 avg change
Mar
Oct
Mar
Nov
Mar
Jul
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGL

4.0

(1)

ENGL399

4.0

(1)

ENGL260

4.0

(1)

ENGL475

4.0

(1)

ENGLISH100

3.5

(2)
+20 more courses
Difficulty by Course

110

5.0

ENG270

5.0

ENG101

5.0

ENGL

5.0

024

5.0

Similar Professors