3.0

Pamela Richmond

English - Sacramento City College

3.0
Quality
4.0
Difficulty
19%
Would Retake
86
Reviews
3.0
Quality
4.0
Difficulty
3.1
Helpful
2.8
Clarity

19%

Would Retake

86

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
86 total ratings

5

26

4

15

3

11

2

12

1

22

What Students Say

I loved English and writing but she has made me hate both

ENGWR301 - 2.0 rating

None of them is easy, but you will learn, you'll be respected, motivated, get to pick your own topic for essay, and you will come out a GREAT writer

100 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

73%

Textbook Required

32%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B-

95% confidence
Based on 17 grades
Most common grades:
C (4)
A (3)
Not sure yet (3)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(5)C(6)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 21 reported grades
C: 4
A: 3
Not sure yet: 3
B: 3
Common Tags
Tough grader (8)
Lots of homework (6)
Tough Grader (5)
Get ready to read (5)
So many papers (5)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (4)
SO MANY PAPERS (3)
Caring (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.56 avg change
May
Dec
Jan
Dec
Dec
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

300

5.0

(1)

ENGLISH1A

5.0

(1)

ENGWR

5.0

(1)

ENG

5.0

(1)

WRIT100

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

100

5.0

ENGLISH1A

5.0

ENGLISH300

5.0

ENG300

4.3

ENGWR300

4.2

Reviews (85)
2.0
4.0
ENG100
Dec 14, 2003

She tries to prepare you for English 300 by giving you English 300 work. She is very unclear about when homework is due. She talks about things that worry her in class and makes you write essays about them eg. Arnold S as governor. etc.

3.0
5.0
ENGWR302
Oct 2, 2004

Well, not much different from other critical thinking teachers. I hate to criticly think, and thats what You have to do, just to figure out what to do. I havent had a good Eng teacher in the area of clairity so, she gets a C-. very politicly contraversial

3.0
3.0
ENGWR302
Oct 9, 2004

It seems like you have to be somewhat good at writing to begin this class. It would be very helpful to be up to date in politics and knowledgeable in religion - or be neutral (not offensive or offended) on most subjects.

4.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Oct 22, 2004

She assigns a lot of work, but is over all a very informed and interesting prof. Be prepared to work hard and you will certainly know how to write essays properly by the end of this class. She gives clear warning first day you start class, "it won't be easy"

5.0
5.0
ENGLISH1A
Nov 11, 2004

Pam was the best teacher I've ever had! I took the accelerated summer class and she helped me increase my critical and analytical skills which have helped me look at the world differently and she prepared me for Univeristy writing. Even though she's not the easiest teacher, it's worth the hard work

5.0
2.0
ENGWR
Nov 16, 2004

I took Pam for 1A & 1C. A lot of people complained about her using the classes as a "platform" for her beliefs, but I think they were just mad that they didn't know how to write. Pam is a great teacher and was extremely encouraging and really made people think, even if they didn't want to.

3.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Nov 16, 2004

If you like a very liberal feminist view on things you'll like this class. She assigns a lot of work at once, which makes it tough. She really incorporates her beliefs in her teaching, which I found to be annoying.

2.0
5.0
ENG300
Nov 21, 2004

Richmond is extremely liberal, and pushes her views on students. She completely bashes anything Republican and places blame on the party for anything negative that happens. She is very opinionated and it seems like if she does not agree with yours, then yours is wrong. Her grading is too difficult!!

4.0
5.0
ENGLISH300
Dec 8, 2004

She is not very hard on checking your grammatical errors.She is very political (liberal), so you'll need to somehow be liberal in your thinking to get a good grade. Your paper should be somewhat rebellious towards government and religion. She doesnt return paper on time :( .lot of work!!

5.0
1.0
300
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2004

Pam is a great teacher but some can't get past her political view. Right or left, she makes you think. If you get a bad grade it's because you're a bad writer. I rarely agree with her, but she respects my views

5.0
3.0
1A
Dec 27, 2004

Ms. Richmond really helped me with my writing. I learned more in her class than I did in my 300. Her work is like ENGR 300, but she does a great job at preparing her students for 300. She is strict, but she really cares about her students writing, and she gives very good feedback.

2.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Aug 21, 2005

She is totally unorganized-collects and assigns new assignments (essays) before she gives back the old ones which makes it difficult to correct your mistakes. She is too libral and want you accept only her ideas and views. Avoid this teacher at all cost!!!

4.0
3.0
ENGLISH110
Aug 31, 2005

She's talkative, fun, motivating, makes the class interesting, cracks jokes, an awesome teacher and everyone is participating and interesting. The times goes by fast!

5.0
1.0
ENG
Grade: A
Oct 6, 2005

mrs richmond makes you think and is pretty easy going, don't try to take advantage of her good nature

5.0
3.0
ENGWR100
Dec 8, 2005

Richmond makes the class interesting and gets her students motivated and really cares. She cracks jokes and conversates with her students. Great discussions, very openminded, fun, time goes by fast, liberal, helpful, creative and hot. She's AWESOME!

4.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Dec 13, 2005

hard but awesome, few survivors at the end

5.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Dec 19, 2005

Richmond is a good teacher. most drop out of her class by the end of the semister. She is hard and has a TON of homework but if you do the work you shouldn't have a problem. She is easy to talk to and very understanding! Take advantage of her office hours, she helped me a lot with my essays and term paper. She is also hilarious in class as well :)

5.0
4.0
ENGWR300
May 19, 2006

ONe of the best teachers of english at scc. very smart, very good. If you like to write take richmond, if you are a conservative bible thumper, you find yourself attempting to defend your views with out much success- becausse of you-not the proffesor, she is awesome

3.0
4.0
ENGWR100
Oct 18, 2006

I've never been covered in so much homework in my life. Finally someone who was able to make me hate the English Language.

4.0
2.0
ENG100
Nov 21, 2006

Great teacher

5.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Nov 22, 2006

I would have to agree with some of the other ratings; Pamela is very liberal. However, that doesn't excuse the fact that she's an awsome teacher. I'm a republican, and I find that she is very helpful and is willing to negotiate. I've written papers she has not agreed with, and I still recieved at least a B on them. If u take her expect a lot of work.

5.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Dec 21, 2006

Ms Richmond, please! Yes an ultra-liberal, slightly to the left of Karl Marx. Clearly an Ubermabige Frau Feminist. But she teaches. She lectures the entire class, works hard at it and teaches you to write. (Unlike some). And, boys and girls, she will teach you what a fallacious argument is. Critical analysis and hair splitting semantics, her forte.

2.0
4.0
ENGWR1756
Jan 15, 2007

never on time and never explained work

2.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Apr 11, 2007

Gives WAY too much homework that takes WAY too much time. 3 hrs of homework for a class that isn't even at college level is way too much. Take anyone but this one unless you have a lot of free time.

5.0
4.0
WRIT100
Apr 23, 2007

A-W-E-S-O-M-E: SHE DOES GIVE A LOT OF HOMEOWRK, BUT IT'S HELPFUL, SHE HELPS SO MUCH, SHE GRADES FAIRLY, AND IS NOT BASED ON HER VIEW POINTS, BUT MERELY ON YOUR SKILLS IN WRITING. I HATED ENGLISH BUT NOT ANY MORE ITS MY FAVORITE CLASS, SHE IS GREAT. TIME FLYS BY FAST! THE CLASS STARTS OF REALLY FUL AND ENDS UP EMPTY, BUT OVERALL SHE IS THE BEST!

2.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Apr 30, 2007

not helpful

5.0
3.0
ENGWR100
May 1, 2007

she is hot no doubt about that and she is so helpful..Some problems made it so i couldnt be in class and she really didnt care and i was able to make them up.

2.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Aug 6, 2007

Although I read some pretty decent comments about her, once I got to class I found her to be very obnoxious. She's really biased and if you don't share the same opinion as she does, then she ridicules you in front of the class or cuts your short. ALso, while we're having discussions, she would keep putting words in other people's mouths.

5.0
3.0
ENG300
Dec 5, 2007

No Comments

3.0
4.0
ENG300
Dec 24, 2007

at first i thought that i'd hate this class, but i ended up making it fine. the workload is really high and the prompts are way too ambitious for eng 300. this prof likes to push her own agenda. i found the discussions VERY irritating. nice lady, ok teacher, very opinionated. don't take her class if you are a republican, a man or pro-capitalism.

2.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Jan 8, 2008

Overall cool lady, I like her as a person.. but as an English professor, not so much. Absolutely no structure to any lectures throughout the semester. She comes to class unprepared & is extremely unorganized. She gives semi-proper directions on an assignment after you've turned it in, not before. Very frustrating class, but I did learn a lot.

1.0
3.0
ENGWR300
Feb 21, 2008

I am half way through the semester and sick of her progressive liberal propoganda. You can hardly call this an english class, as theres no literary analysis, or even quality literature for that matter. The class discussions are her merely pushing her agenda, only liberals will find her and her sickeningly evident biases intriguing.

5.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Jun 10, 2008

YOU WILL LEARN ALOT. SHE KNOWS HER STUFF AND AS SHE TEACHES YOU SHE EXPECTS YOU TO KNOW YOUR STUFF. SHE IS BIG ON FOREIGN POLICY AND SHE HAS AN OPINION ABOUT EVERYTHING. I LEARNED A LOT AND SHE IS A FEMINIST.

5.0
4.0
ENG300
Jun 18, 2008

She is not that tough. I learned a lot about econ and politics though less about grammar. She was willing to stay after class and help students with essays and writing. You'll learn a lot and just have to do homework--that's what she grades alot on.

5.0
2.0
ENGWR302
Jun 18, 2008

She is a smart, sharp, and very opinionated but don't let that discourage you; she like a good verbal challenge and she is really nice too. She knows her stuff and she makes herself available for her students. We wrote at least five essays (mostly on political topics) and the work load was not bad. I would take her again.

4.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Nov 5, 2008

She is a overall nice lady. I took her class and she demoralized me because of all the papers that I wrote in her class never seemed to be up to her standards. However, I took Eng 100 again and passed with a B. It was kind of strange because two of the topics that I wrote essays on she gave me a low C where as my last english teacher gave me B's.

1.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Dec 9, 2008

VERY RUDE NOT HELPFUL SHE WAS TO POLITICAL ALWAYS GOT OFF THE SUBJECT GIVES TONS OF ESSAYS THAT DO NOT MAKE SENCE VERY CONFUSSING SHE HAS POOR ATTITUDE I DO NOT RECOMEND HER

1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Feb 1, 2009

Worst teacher ever, she doesn't explain assignments and expects you to have them on time but never collects them. Class started with 20 students or more and ended with 6, she failed all of us even though she said we would get credit for staying in her class. DO NOT TAKE HER CLASS!!

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Mar 4, 2009

Very poor professor did not care about her students, always put them down very poor quality VERY VERY VERY BAD PROFESSOR

5.0
4.0
ENG300
Jun 11, 2009

I see a lot of comments about this professor that are negative but liked her. She improved my writing alot and made us think about alot of issues and read. There is a lot of homework and writing but hey its a writing class!!! She is helpful after class and talking to in person. Students who don't work won't pass. That explains the negativitiy.

1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Dec 10, 2009

I believe that her class is useful if you would like to exercise your brain. As far as organizational purposes, she is extremely scattered. Crams things in to little schedules and expects things to be done. Stresses her students out. Forcing them to turn in "poor" complete assignments when a student can actually achieve better.Slaps you w/ a smile.

1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Dec 14, 2009

SHE IS THE WORST TEACHER EVER! tries to say she wants to hear what her students have to say, but she is only waiting for her next break to say her points of views, the only ones she truly believes. Way too much homework and horrible explanations! DO NOT TAKE HER!!!!!

1.0
5.0
ENG100
Jan 21, 2010

THE WORST PROFESSOR EVER HAD VERY RUDE TO HER STUDENTS!!!! HAS THE NERVE TO PUT STUDENTS DOWN IF THEY DID NOT UNDER STAND THE WORK.I DO NOT RECOMED HER!!!! AND FOR THE RECORD THE NEGATIVITY IS FOR THE POOR QUALITY OF PROFESSOR I DID DO MY WORK AND PASSED WITH A B!!!!

3.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Jan 28, 2010

she spent most of her time talking about politics and how corporations are bad, i hated that shed be absent and not help us when we were struggling, but i did get an economics, history, and social lesson all in one, not much English though... i passed with an A others might not be so lucky

5.0
1.0
ENGWR300
May 6, 2010

She taght me alot about current events and English too. She is super understanding and helpful

1.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Dec 5, 2010

Don't take her class... completely useless... very unorganized

4.0
4.0
ENGWR100
Dec 13, 2010

Expects the homework done and to the specifications given. Attendance and participation important. Explained a lot of the why behind grading and expectations.

5.0
1.0
ENGWR100
Dec 14, 2010

She was an excellent teacher. Got off subject alot but shewas there to help you if you needed the extra help

4.0
3.0
ENGWR100
May 6, 2011

She is helpful, and if you are a student that usually does your work, the class is good. Midterms and in-class essays will make or break you!! Attendance is mandatory, she will fail you with 1 unexcused attendance, or 1 missing assignment. Still in the process of her class. I am in danger on failing because of 1 point shy of passing the midterm.

5.0
3.0
ENGWR100
May 8, 2011

She is very opinionated. Controversial topics. Talks a lot. Nice. Late homework OK. Overemphasizes directions, but is lenient. My BP was through the roof, but I was on top of current events. A 3 point Thesis is HUGE with her. SHE makes you THINK. Recommended if you like voicing opinions, or listening to controversial discussions.

2.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Nov 16, 2011

Nice lady talks alot always LATE!LOTS of work in general very onesided(her way or no way!)over all i ended up dropping it her class it sucked. DONT TAKE HER CLASS consider another professor.

3.0
3.0
ENGWR202
Dec 2, 2011

Prof. Richmond is ok!!! Some days she is on track and others she's off track. The only thing that is not so good about her is how she teach. She doesn't give out much examples or hints of how to do the assignments. She briefly explains and covers the assignments or homework leaving the rest to you. Everything comes out of the books!!!

4.0
3.0
ENGWR100
Jan 13, 2012

Loved this teacher!! Explains everything well. She actually wants people to pass. 3-point thesis is a huge thing with her. If you go to class consistently you will pass the class. Flexible with homework. Bottom line she is there for you and is rooting for you to pass.

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Apr 11, 2012

She's a good teacher. I learned alot from her and she did allow makeup work as long as we bring paperwork. She's nice but you have to do homework and keep up. She reviews how she grades and talks about the final a lot. I learned alot about thesis and development and using source. Highly recomend and would take again.

1.0
5.0
ENGWR101
Dec 3, 2012

I personally REALLY DIDNT like Richmond as a prof. She is a VERY HARD grader and she constantly talks about politics and garbage/recycling. The essays were mostly about garbage which was hard and a lot of times the prompt didn't make sense. She gives a lot of HomeWork!! I Don't recommend taking her!!

4.0
3.0
ENGWR101
Jan 9, 2013

Lets start off by saying professor Richmond's English writing class is NOT the class to take if you want an easy A. Richmond assign A lot of homework which can feel a tad bit redundant. However I can honestly say I learned A lot from her, and if you really want to learn, and become a good writer I would highly recommend taking her class.

5.0
4.0
ENGWR101
May 23, 2013

Despite her toughness, she does want you to succeed and OPEN YOUR EYES and make your own opinions that you can logically defend. She is honestly a great teacher, and seems intimidating and rough around the edges, but it's more of tough love sense. She wants you to act like an adult and succeed!

1.0
5.0
ENGWR100
Jul 13, 2013

Do not recommend her. Tons of homework that focus on repetitively paraphrasing journals and articles instead of real writing development. More work than Engwr 300.

3.0
4.0
ENGWR51
Aug 12, 2014

AVOID!!!!!!!!

5.0
3.0
ENGWR300
Dec 10, 2014

Not an easy A class, but I recommend her. She assigns a lot of work and essays, but they're easy and enjoyable topics to write about. She's a hard grader, but she provides a lot of feed back (very helpful). The real problem is motivation. If you're off track, then you'll probably not survive her class.

3.0
5.0
100
Dec 12, 2014

Very rude, pushy in her opinions, and she just does not know how to teach. If you truly want to learn to write like a pro, you need to take either Prof. Dana Armstrong or Dr. Steve Cirrone. None of them is easy, but you will learn, you'll be respected, motivated, get to pick your own topic for essay, and you will come out a GREAT writer. NO PAMELA

2.0
4.0
ENGWR301
Grade: B-
Apr 14, 2015

Terrible. Possibly one of the worst teachersprofessors I have ever had. I loved English and writing but she has made me hate both. She is extremely disorganized and forgetful. The classes don't even consist of teaching, they're just butt-kissing contests by students who try to sound smart and philosophical, and nothing gets done. Do not take.

5.0
3.0
ENG300
Grade: B+
Apr 25, 2016

Richmond is tough but not as hard as other people have said. I got along with her. I had trouble on my research project and she would talk to me after class and give me good suggestions. I do not think the class is hard unless you do not do the homework. You have to keep up with reading and there is a lot of essays to read and journals to write.

1.0
5.0
ENG300
May 19, 2016

She is so tough and rude. It is very boring in her class and haven't learned anything at all. Very strict and unbearable. All the contend of the class is about environment, such a boring topic. Lots of homework and have not clear guideline. I did the homework almost depend on guessing and she is giving no help. In a word, she ruined my semester.

4.0
4.0
ENGWR101
Grade: Not sure yet
Jul 22, 2016
Would take again

Since my class with her was in the summer, everything was condensed into 6 weeks. Thanks to her, I've become a better writer for sure. I noticed how much I've developed in my writing. She makes sure the entire class knows the material & doesn't move on until we know it solid. She was really nice but offered constructive criticism. Amazing teacher

2.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Apr 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She told us to buy a book that will neever use the whole year. talked about too much politics. very tough grader. never taking her again

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
4.0
3.0
ENG300
Grade: Not sure yet
May 15, 2017
Would take again

You know at first I thought it was the end for me until I actually got to know her and talk to her after class. She's really cool if you talk to her and she makes sure you understand what you don't. I never had an English teacher so passionate about politics which was pretty awesome too.

Tough Grader
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Caring
4.0
4.0
ENGWR101
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 7, 2017
Would take again

One of my favorite teachers at SCC. She is super funny, sweet, and has sass. She does give a lot of homework and essays. She does grade work hard but it made me a better writer! She really wants the best for her students. & Yes she is political, but it is fun to write about these topics especially the ones happening today. THANK YOU PROFESSOR!

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Mar 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This professor has no clear agenda. She is very unclear on due dates as well as changing due dates. The class consists mainly review of videos and articles that align to her liberal opinions. There is very little instruction or learning in class. Worst of all any assignments or essays you dont get grades or reviews until the end of class.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
3.0
3.0
ENGWR302
Grade: C
Apr 14, 2018
Wouldn't take again

The class was essentially a book club for Dark Money. You can tell that the professor likes to keep up to date with politics and government, which has merit, but there were times where i wish she would go over mistakes in our arguments and focus more on the work that we were outputting. Your papers will reference Dark Money book, not the textbook.

Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
May 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She ruined my semester and I regret that I enrolled in her class. She doesn't encourage you or appreciate your effort, she doesn't really teach she just assigns too much homework. I warn you Do Not Take This Professor!!! I Regret Taking Her!!! Above all she is rude and inconsiderate.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
5.0
ENG300
Jun 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Worst Prof. that I've ever had. She's going to make you buy a book that you will never use, she only gave a few feedback on your paper and then grade it so late, I also believe that she give random grades because I don't see my grades on canvas, she don't give advice on how you can improve your writing or your grade. (ADVICE) DON'T TAKE HER CLASS.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
5.0
1A
Grade: C
Jun 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I did not take this professor in sac city college instead I took this professor for an English workload course in UC Davis. This professor belittled me and discouraged me from taking her class because she found out I learned two languages before learning English, she said I would not pass her class and I should drop it.

Tough grader
5.0
4.0
ENGWR101
Grade: B
Aug 29, 2019
Wouldn't take again

If you want to learn and have the time. Take this class. She is very dedicated and will help until you understand. Lots and lots of work but if you do it youll pass. Funny and cool. Wont be taking her again due to busy schedule and too much hw load.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ENG300
Grade: C+
Nov 14, 2019
Wouldn't take again

This teacher is not clear on due dates! She only gives assignments and readings that fit her political beliefs and is not open to what anyone else has to say. She assigns a lot of reading outside of class and does not go over them at all. She is the worst teacher I have ever had!

Lots of homework
So many papers
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Grade: C
Jan 19, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Shes a great professor and really has her students best interest at heart. Shes understanding as long as she sees that you are genuinely putting in effort. i took her class a few years ago but i always remembered her. 4 Essays and Hw every week. i should have received an F but she gave me a C.

1.0
5.0
ENG300
Grade: Rather not say
May 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Originally this class was face to face, but due to COVID we switched to online and it was awful. Communication worsened and she would use lame excuses as to why she couldn't communicate with us. She gets SUPER political which made me, and the rest of my class uncomfortable. Very unclear with dates and her grading is awful, never taking her again.

Lots of homework
So many papers
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
ENGWR101
Grade: A-
Dec 1, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This was the first class I took in college during the summer of 2019. Honestly one of the hardest classes I have taken because it was almost a 3-hour class and we had to write many essays and read a lot out of class. She sometimes will give pop quizzes so be ready for those. For being a 101 basic class, it seemed more like a 300 or 302 class.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
2.0
4.0
ENGWR302
Grade: B
Dec 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I would not recommend taking this class if you don't have time to email her multiple times just for her not to respond. For all the essays we wrote, they were all politically based; wasn't the most engaging. She doesn't follow her syllabus due dates, and during finals we were supposed to have an essay, but never heard from her.

Get ready to read
So many papers
Tough grader
5.0
4.0
ENGWR302
Grade: A
Jan 3, 2021
Would take again

Professor Richmond is one of the most caring teachers I've ever had. This was an online class during the pandemic. Although there were a few times when the canvas assignments got confusing, she was really fair about remedies and really understanding when there were issues. I wish I had her as a f2f teacher, but of course covid made that impossible.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Caring
1.0
5.0
ENG300
Grade: C+
Dec 6, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Horrible. Worst class Ive ever taken. Dont expect an email response.

1.0
4.0
ENGWR300
Grade: D-
Dec 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Definitely do not take her I have all As except in her class due to the little help she provides . She does not care about your situation, dont expect any responses, I wrote an email to her regarding an assignment twice and I never got a response back. She just gave me a 0

So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
3.0
ENGWR300
Grade: B-
Dec 15, 2021
Wouldn't take again

never responds to emails, slow to grade assignments (ex - she'll give feedback on a rough draft after the final essay was due), and instructions are unclear at times.

1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Grade: C
Dec 22, 2022

Was a great teacher, until the middle of the semester, she disappeared out of nowhere & wouldn't reply to emails. Appeared to publish homework & essays & disappears again. Never answered emails, always graded late & topics were so political. She's very unorganized & some of her instructions for essays were confusing & unclear to follow along with.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
So many papers
1.0
5.0
ENGWR300
Grade: B
Apr 22, 2025

Unclear instructions, blames students for her miscommunication, lots of reading and writing. 6 page essays almost every other week.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lots of homework
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

73%

Textbook Required

32%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B-

95% confidence
Based on 17 grades
Most common grades:
C (4)
A (3)
Not sure yet (3)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(5)C(6)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 21 reported grades
C: 4
A: 3
Not sure yet: 3
B: 3
Common Tags
Tough grader (8)
Lots of homework (6)
Tough Grader (5)
Get ready to read (5)
So many papers (5)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (4)
SO MANY PAPERS (3)
Caring (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.56 avg change
May
Dec
Jan
Dec
Dec
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

300

5.0

(1)

ENGLISH1A

5.0

(1)

ENGWR

5.0

(1)

ENG

5.0

(1)

WRIT100

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

100

5.0

ENGLISH1A

5.0

ENGLISH300

5.0

ENG300

4.3

ENGWR300

4.2

Similar Professors