2.7

Paul Bloomfield

Philosophy - University of Connecticut

2.7
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
25%
Would Retake
128
Reviews
2.7
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
2.7
Helpful
2.8
Clarity

25%

Would Retake

128

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

28

4

25

3

17

2

11

1

47

What Students Say

He loves to hear himself talk, and doesn't like answering questions

PHIL1104 - 3.0 rating

"You get an A if the paper is good" is the gist

PHIL1104 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

55%

Textbook Required

24%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 62 grades
Most common grades:
B (14)
A (14)
Not sure yet (12)
Grade Distribution
A(16)B(18)C(7)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(21)
Based on 78 reported grades
B: 14
A: 14
Not sure yet: 12
A-: 11
Common Tags
Graded by few things (28)
Skip class? You won't pass. (27)
Tough grader (23)
Get ready to read (22)
Lecture heavy (21)
Participation matters (11)
LECTURE HEAVY (8)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (8)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.89 avg change
Jan
Apr
Jun
Jul
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL226

5.0

(1)

PHIL1101

5.0

(2)

PHIL3228

5.0

(1)

PHIL104

4.0

(13)

PHIL215

4.0

(1)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL3226

4.8

PHIL2215

4.1

PHIL215

4.0

PHIL3228

4.0

PHIL1104

3.5

Reviews (128)
4.0
3.0
PHIL104
Apr 10, 2003

No Comments

4.0
4.0
PHIL215
May 11, 2004

Awesome professor, knows what he's talking about and how to relate it to the students. Very positive and willing to help (after you get through the first week or two of scaring out the slackers)!

4.0
3.0
PHIL104
Jun 13, 2004

Good prof, gives an interesting lecture, but exams were 3-4 page take home essays, should have gotten W credit for it.

5.0
3.0
PHIL104
Oct 26, 2004

awesome awesome awesome. Great speaker and makes the topic interesting

2.0
3.0
PHIL104
Dec 16, 2004

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PHIL104
Dec 31, 2004

Cool guy. Looks like Uncle Jesse from Full House. Not really that clear, but it's hard to be in Philosophy. Gives take-home tests and the final was easy. Recommended as long as you get a good TA, which are scarce.

4.0
2.0
PHIL104
Feb 10, 2005

This class is actually an easy class but make sure you have a good TA. Most grade really hard and give alot of quizzes but this can be avoided if you read and do your take home exam early and ask your TA to proof read your paper.

3.0
2.0
PHIL101
Mar 29, 2005

The class itself is pretty easy if you have a good TA. But if you're going to lecture make sure you've had some coffee or bring a pillow.

5.0
2.0
PHIL104
Aug 25, 2005

Good Teacher. If ur intrested in the topics youll like the course. Make sure u get a good TA. I had coleena

3.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY104
Dec 7, 2005

This class really does depend on the TA... The readings although lengthy and sometimes boring, are not necessary if you go to lecture. He goes over everything you need to know. It can be quite interesting at times. All in all, the class is not too bad for a gen. ed.

5.0
3.0
PHIL226
Dec 16, 2005

If you wanna be a lawyer take the class..brilliant man who holds you interest all class

5.0
3.0
PHIL104
Dec 21, 2005

a really intelligent guy. He keeps the class very interesting.

5.0
2.0
PHIL104
Nov 3, 2006

This class is amazing. I didnt want to even take the class to begin with. The lectures are pretty easy but you have to get a good TA. I had Wisdom, he's amazing. Go to both office hours and youll get the edge you need to get the A. The midterms were so easy. I mean you get to take it home and get it revised by your TA before you hand it in. Hes Hot

2.0
3.0
PHIL217
Jun 5, 2007

Bloomfield was in love with himself...his insights were substandard and the grading for a class seemingly so loose and comfortable was arbitrary to a point of ridiculousness AVOID

5.0
2.0
PHIL104
Jan 3, 2008

best one i ever had so far!

5.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Dec 16, 2008

Great lecturer. Made the material easy to understand. Exams were take home and straight forward, though still challenging. Go to class and you'll get an A.

5.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Dec 18, 2008

He was a very good prof - kept things interesting - very animated. Take home exam papers. As long as you do the SHORT readings, listen to him, and have an opinion, you'll do fine.

5.0
2.0
PHIL1104
May 10, 2009

Lecture was a waste of my time, I didn't listen and was on facebook most of the time I just went to make sure I took down the notes. The reading are extremely long, my advice don't do them. There are two papers, which each are only on one of the readings, just read those two. The final exam is on a book called the Symposium which isvery interesting

4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
May 11, 2009

I'm a person who goes to lectures, and I found this one completely missable. Like the person below me, I was almost always on facebook during it. The two papers are proofread by your TA and the final was three essay questions about the Symposium, which you could have with you during the exam. Recommend taking the class for an gen-ed.

4.0
1.0
PHIL104
May 31, 2009

Great teacher. All you need to do is read the short symposium book and pay attention in class. Easy A.

4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Nov 12, 2009

Good lecturer. Makes the material understandable. Sometimes boring, sometimes exciting. Overall, not bad.

5.0
2.0
PHIL1101
May 4, 2011

I was not very interested in philosophy until I took this class. Professor Bloomfield is a rather good lecturer and makes the material make sense. Your grade is based on a midterm, essay and final. I didn't find any to be difficult as long as you attend class. I highly recommend this class if you need to take a philosophy gen ed.

5.0
2.0
PHIL1101
Sep 2, 2011

Your grades are a paper and two exams, which are based on your lectures. He's very fun and high energy, and doesn't mind repeating things until you get it. Also, there is no book for the class; he puts all the readings online! Your wallet will thank him.

5.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Oct 31, 2011

(Phil and Social Ethics) Bloomfield is an AWESOME professor! I love his lectures- they're always super interesting - he's not a waste of your time at all - go to class - it's the only way to do well. Some topics really make you think which is rare in college. I think I might be a better person because of his class. Take him. You won't regret it.

3.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Dec 29, 2011

Bloomfield can be funny and uses a lot of real life examples to prove his points, but I thought he was still confusing. He has high expectations on assignments for a gen ed class. Not a bad professor, but he is full of himself which can be annoying.

3.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Dec 19, 2012

It was not a horrible class but I didn't like that the TAs grade everything and they all graded differently so your grade basically depends on your TA. Some lectures were interesting but I still found it to be a pointless class.

3.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Dec 19, 2012

Class is way harder than it needs to me, absolutely ridiculous. I had nearly a 4.0 before taking this class and ended up doing very poorly and my GPA dropped a lot. AVOID THIS CLASS

4.0
2.0
PHILO1104
Jan 24, 2013

Bloomfield is a good professor. His lectures are always very interesting and though his multiple choice midterm was much more difficult and confusing than it needed to be, the take-home essay was worth nearly 40% of the grade and made it easy to raise your grade. I didn't do well on the first midterm but still ended up with an A-. Great class!

5.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Mar 19, 2013

Very quirky guy and odd at times. Nevertheless, a good speaker, very interesting class. Just make sure you have read the material before the test. Take very good notes, write down all the points he makes. Midterm isn't too bad if you follow the above. Spend time on your essay & perfect it. Its 40% of grade. Ask TA what he/she is looking for.

4.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Mar 28, 2013

Going to class is mandatory. Has no powerpoints so what you write is all you have. Exams are tricky but do-able. Only teaches 1 side of all the arguments or in this case his side... If you cant deal with someone saying affirmative action is good or pro-abortion then dont take this class

5.0
1.0
PHIL1104
May 11, 2013

Everything he tests you on is said in class, you don't even have to do the readings. If you go to every class and take notes, it's an easy A. Just a heads up for any hardcore conservatives, he will take the liberal side on all controversial issues discussed in class.

5.0
2.0
PHIL1104
May 12, 2013

Lectures are quite interesting and helpful, so go to them. Overall, not a bad class or professor.

5.0
2.0
PHIL1104
May 25, 2013

40% of your grade comes from a paper graded by your TA so he's more important for your final grade than Bloomfield. Lectures aren't all that important to go to but they can be interesting so its up to you. Read the essays he posts and know the Symposium and you'll be mostly set for an A.

5.0
1.0
PHIL1104
Nov 9, 2013

I LOVED this class. Bloomfield is the man. Honestly, if his lectures don't qualify as engaging or interesting for you, I don't know what you're looking for. He takes questions mid-lecture and fields them well, so if you ever want to call him out, he's fine with that. Very funny guy, cares if you do well and actually helps you do well in his class.

4.0
1.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Dec 18, 2013

Bloomfield is full of himself, but did a fine job teaching the course. The material is very easy; attend lecture and take good notes and you'll be prepared for the midterm and final.

4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Jan 6, 2014

everything on the exams were said in lecture.. examples he uses are very entertaining. can get a little boring at times but if you stay attentive you can get an easy A. Only complaint is he tends to only teach his opinion on things

4.0
1.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Aug 18, 2014

Took this class online over the summer and it was pretty easy. The ta does most of the grading, so just do well on the papers and youll get an a. Bloomfield can be picky about the way you word things and almost forces you to agree with the way he thinks on some things. Overall, a good class to take, especially if your required to take philosophy.

5.0
1.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Aug 18, 2014

Easy class, basically all you have to do is summarize arguments from the readings. Exams and papers were pretty easy, the ta grades everything. They are picky on how you word things so be careful. Topics are interesting to think about- professor has a clear view on some and wants you to think the same about controversial topics. overall good class.

4.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Dec 10, 2014

I really disliked this class. Overall, it's not that hard, but there's a paper due worth 40% of your grade, which is ridiculous. VERY liberal, and expects you to agree with him. If you believe in white privilege abortion andor can swallow your pride and agree with him, class is bearable.

3.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Dec 18, 2014

Like many others have said, he's liberal. But don't take what he says personally. He loves to hear himself talk, and doesn't like answering questions. When you do pose a hard question, he always says he'll get back to you but never does. TAs do majority of grading. Paper is okay if you agree with everything he says. Pay attention to his lectures.

4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Mar 25, 2015

Lectures are interesting and makes you contemplate a lot. Everyone thinks of him being too liberal but those who complain have obviously never met a philosopher. If he didn't believe in Affirmative Action or abortion he would be a terrible philosopher and if you don't believe in them then hopefully this class will point you in the right direction.

3.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: C
May 14, 2015

Engaging lecturer, but his class was terribly managed. He didn't post a single grade online so you have no way of gauging your performance and the essay expectations are convoluted at best. Essentially, they want you to write 1000 words without saying anything, but that's philosophy for you. I'm into this stuff, but it's not worth the trouble.

3.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
May 22, 2015

Very liberal professor and actually pretty offensive at times. With such a large class there is no opportunity to refute or discuss points he makes which is very frustrating. It seems he likes to hear himself talk...

5.0
1.0
1104
Grade: A
Oct 26, 2015

I never went to class, and that's something I very much regret now. The lectures were very interesting and it was the one class I was unable to fall asleep in.

1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Dec 17, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Very opinionated in his lectures. No powerpoints to go off of. You have to go to class and take good notes to do well

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Dec 19, 2016
Would take again

Professor Bloomfield is a great lecturer! It is true that there are no slides, so you have to write down stuff he says. But this forces you to pay attention to what he's saying, and the material is actually pretty interesting! There's some writing involved in this class, but if you go to TAs for help, you'll be okay (since they do the grading).

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Amazing lectures
3.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Jan 23, 2017
Would take again

Interesting lecturer. as everyone else has said, he is very liberal and very opinionated. I recommend just swallowing your pride if you disagree with him and write what he wants to hear. sometimes that just the smart thing to do in terms of getting a good grade. also go to discussions, the TA's tell you everything important in the lecture

Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
May 29, 2017
Would take again

The class had basically no work: midterm, short take-home essay, and final. You need to go to basically every class, but you only need to sit and listen to do well. Bloomfield has some insightful things to say, so I really enjoyed his lectures and I think a lot of students could take something out of this course. Also he's pretty hot

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Amazing lectures
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Oct 30, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Loves to hear himself talk. Very opinionated and convinced that he is right about everything. Thinks his class is much more important than it actually is. Refuses to put notes online, forcing you to go to every lecture to write down his ramblings. Might be a decent guy, but awful professor. Avoid if you can

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Nov 10, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He does not post any lecture note, everything depends on your note on the class. Two exams counts for 50% of your grades and 40% on your essay, 10% for discussion. He is hilarious but use quiet good on your grades.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Dec 13, 2017
Wouldn't take again

2 in class exams one take home paper. Exams are 25% each paper is 40%. 10% participation First exam is multiple choice, and all the options are to close to eliminate one or the other. It's very specific info from readings. Take home paper depends on your TA, so if you get a bad one good luck. No notes, slides, take this class elsewhere.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
4.0
PHIL104
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 14, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Took this class to fulfill a requirement thought it'd be easy but was totally wrong first exam is all multiple choice studied so hard and didn't do well. If you skip lecture then good luck catching up, definitely take a different class if you can.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Tests are tough
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
Dec 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Overall the content was moderately interesting, however, extracting the important information out of his "lecture" was challenging. He doesn't use powerpoint notes, doesn't offer any type of review session prior to exams and a majority of the "grading" will be done by a TA. Overall, the course is straightforward but wouldn't really recommend it.

Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
Jul 12, 2018
Wouldn't take again

So I took his class online over the summer as a mandatory STEM requirement and I've never been moved to criticize a professor until Bloomfield. The grading rubric for papers, which are a HUGE part of your grade, is entirely arbitrary. "You get an A if the paper is good" is the gist. Dude's arrogant, opinionated, and highly hypocritical.

2.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Oct 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He has no lecture slides so it's hard to follow his (incredibly opinionated) lectures, which are completely subjective and then gives you an objective multiple choice midterm with horribly written questions that even my TA didn't like. My TA was great luckily for me. I wouldn't recommend

Participation matters
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Oct 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This gen ed class needed for most STEM majors is fairly opinionated and poorly structured. My TA for this class disagrees with most of the professor says which says a lot about how the course is structured. There are no lecture slides, and the class is structured around Paul Bloomfield's opinions. Word of advice, don't take this class.

Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I've never gotten a grade below a B in my life until this class. I'm literally failing even though I do every reading and have been to every class and taken thorough notes. The structure of the class sets you up for failure: 50% midterm and final, 40% paper, and 10% discussion. I spent hours on the paper and got a terrible grade. Avoid at all costs

3.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Does not post slides as lectures are mainly him talking, a midterm and a final as well as a 40% of your grade paper and 10% of your grade presentation, no homework but exams difficult - specific and biased to his views often, take notes in lecture and read the readings and you will be fine, expecting hopefully a B (D on midterm answers too similar)

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Dec 11, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Paul Bloomfield is a good man, but teaches a boring class with useless information. If you are taking this class as a requirement (which you probably are) very little content in this class is memorable. On the final, some students had to write about the "racist" borders of Europe. This is 40% of your grade too.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Dec 14, 2018
Would take again

I loved him but most hated him. All you really need to do is attend class. He's a very entertaining speaker and will talk about everything you'll be tested on. Reading the papers does help, but an A is possible even without.

1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: C+
Dec 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

i bloomed for bloomfield and finessed a fat C+. Thanks for screwing up my gpa over a useless gen ed and forcing me to either pay 1500 dollars extra to Uconn, waste another semester slot learning nothing or making me take a serious GPA hit. Remind me again why this class applies to bio, business and engineering majors. We have more important classes

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Dec 20, 2018
Would take again

Professor Bloomfield makes it very easy to pass if you just attend the lecture and listen closely to what he's saying. He's very focused on discussing assigned readings, so even as someone who didn't read anything, I still got an A- just off of listening to the lecture and participating in the discussion. Even if you disagree, just sit through it.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Inspirational
Hilarious
2.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Dec 28, 2018
Wouldn't take again

MUST attend lecture to do well. Discussion was also critical. My TA was very good; she extracted all the important info from lecture and elaborated. The midterm (multiple choice) was challenging. The take home paper isn't bad if you go to your TA's office hours for feedback. Final exam is all open ended, but was easier than the midterm IMO

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A+
Feb 20, 2019
Would take again

I really loved this class, its incredibly easy and although there are reading assignments every lecture, he thoroughly explains them and I didnt read 70% of them. The ones I did read arent hard and are actually interesting. He is a good lecturer, engaging and will pause for you to ask questions.

Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
May 15, 2019
Would take again

He's a really talented lecturer, and it was easy to follow along despite not having a powerpoint. He's pretty full of himself, which may be a turn off for some. If you go to lecture and take good notes, don't bother doing the readings.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
4.0
5.0
PHIL1104
May 16, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Doomfields class is tough to begin with, but the difficulty of this class is significantly amplified if you do not do the readings or attend the lectures, which I recommend you do because the exams are a heavy mix of reading and lecture content (i.e. Pauls personal views). The class has super interesting material and the lectures are engaging.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
PHIL1104
May 26, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Your grade in this class almost entirely depends on your T.A.

Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A+
Aug 30, 2019
Would take again

Bloomfield is such an intelligent and talented professor. He puts enthusiasm into his lectures and I genuinely enjoyed attending them. There were a lot of readings for this class which were pretty important but if you went to all the lectures and understood them well then you'd probably be fine. Class was really interesting, highly recommend

Respected
Get ready to read
Inspirational
4.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Oct 30, 2019
Would take again

go to lectures and write down everything he says. truly entertaining, explains things well, and is clearly intelligent. if you can't handle occasional arrogance and condescension then take someone else i guess. didn't really read any readings and got A's from transcribing everything. he. says. cos thats what matters (on the assessments at least)

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
3.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Dec 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

So Bloomfield himself is a fine professor when it comes to lecturing, my only complaint is really about the class. Specifically, how dependent your grade is on your TA. One essay is worth 40%, and this can break your grade. Since one exam is MC, this course is really 75% based on your TA since the final is SA. My TA was easy, but some were unlucky.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
PHIL3228
Grade: A
Dec 13, 2019
Would take again

Easily my favorite professor at UConn. He's passionate about what he's teaching and it rubs off on his students. Lectures are engaging and easy to follow. For his classes there's always a paper that's a big percentage of your grade but he helps with feedback along the way. From my experience if you read and take good notes you'll get an A.

Respected
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
Dec 24, 2019
Would take again

Great professor with passion and humor. He knows how to get people's attention and get people feel involved. We all clap for him on the last lesson of the semester. Definitely would take another lesson.

4.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
May 5, 2020
Would take again

Bloomfield is an excellent professor. He is very good at boiling down a topic to an intro level. He knows that most people in this class are not in it because they want to be philosophers. However, this is NOT an easy A. If you put in the work and some effort, you will be fine. Ask him questions!! He is great at explaining things

Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
May 13, 2020
Would take again

Class is necessary for extra understanding; readings and questions based on reading are discussed during class time. Only had to buy one reading for class, all else was online. Manage your work and pay attention to what he requires for the midterm and exam and you should be fine. Also, very interesting material, rarely was I bored in class.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Participation matters
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: C
May 13, 2020
Wouldn't take again

this guy's the WORST. find a different person to teach you this stuff unless you want to deal with an arrogant dingdong who thinks that he's the reigning god of philosophy. thank god for COVID-19 making it nbd for me to pass/fail this course!

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Test heavy
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
May 13, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This class sucks . 80% of your grade depends on your TA. No lecture slides, so you have to go to class to take notes, and write down every single thing Bloomfield says, and he likes to talk a lot. You are lucky if you get a good TA, otherwise you aren't getting in the A/B+ range. This Gen-ed brings down your GPA.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 20, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Worst professor. Inaccessible outside of class and doesn't care about students. Makes this class 10x harder than it needs to be. If you need to take this class I suggest to do it with a different professor.

Skip class? You won't pass.
3.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Nov 10, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Bloomfield is obviously very passionate with what he teaches. He is not a bad professor, but you need to put the time and effort in his class to get your desired grade. His political views are very apparent in his lectures which I personally am not very fond of.

Get ready to read
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B-
Nov 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

His comments are quite snarky, he thinks he's the GOD of philosophy and you cannot challenge him on anything. His lectures go on and on and on and he goes so off on tangents that it's impossible to comprehend anything he's saying. Very harsh grader and makes the class way harder than it has to be. he offers no help at all. DO NOT take his classes.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Nov 30, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Content is interesting, there is not a lot of work so there is a lot of emphasis on the few assignments that you do have - harshly graded midterm short paper, midterm multiple-choice, final. You also need to do discussion posts which he grades harshly. Take this class with another prof if you need it because he makes it harder than it needs to be.

Graded by few things
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Mar 2, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Just the worst

1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 4, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Has a lot of hot takes, lecture is basically listening to him ramble. Lots of readings and mandatory discussion posts every week. Way too much stress and work for a gen ed.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Mar 16, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Save your time and do not take his class. He is just pushing an agenda and he gets way too political.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Mar 23, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Prof Bloomfield's course is structured in a way that a 3 credit 1000 level course will be your heaviest workload during your semester. Poses questions in a confusing manner on exams and quizzes as if he is trying to trick you. As an engineering student, this is the last class you want to worry about. Take with another professor.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 24, 2021
Would take again

Pretty middle of the road professor. Not an easy A but still doable to get a good grade. Loves to lecture and they can be pretty interesting at times. Decent amount of reading for the class but that can be expected.

Respected
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Incomplete
Mar 24, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Prof. Bloomfield knows he's a difficult professor and uses this to brag. He gets rather political during lectures. Lectures are long but can be interesting. Vague assignments/quiz questions that are up to interpretation. Starts off your grade as an F, you work up from there. His class was NOT properly adapted for online learning.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 26, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Take class with a different professor, unnecessarily hard for a gen ed

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Mar 30, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I cannot stress this enough, DO NOT take this class with this man. This is my fourth semester in college and this is hands down the worst professor I've ever had. His lectures are completely useless and provide no value to the course content. Extremely hard grader. Took this as a gen-Ed and was one of the biggest mistakes of my collegiate career.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: C
Apr 6, 2021
Wouldn't take again

RUN! DON'T TAKE PAUL BLOOMFIELD TRUST ME!!!!!!

1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Apr 10, 2021
Wouldn't take again

AVOID THIS CLASS!! Professor Bloomfield gets his political opinions way too involved. Doesnt provide clear prompts for his exams and assignments. He also blabbers on during lecture so its hard to know whats important. Hes a strict grader on discussion posts. 40% of your grade is from 1 paper

1.0
5.0
PHIL3226
Apr 19, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Grading criteria and feedback made no sense. Threatened to the whole class to fail anyone who didnt follow exactly what he wanted for the term paper after reading the DRAFTS for it. Very much a his way or nothing at all Professor.

So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: C
May 5, 2021
Wouldn't take again

This was easily the worst class Ive ever taken. This teacher does not actually teach during his lectures. You can know all the material and still fail tests miserably. Hardest tests ever and such an unorganized class. Do yourself a favor and dont take any of his classes.

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
May 5, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I am writing this review during the time where I was supposed to take a final, but he forgot to upload it. All the students are confused and many emails sent to him and it has been half an hour with no response from him. Dont take his class.

1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
May 6, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Terrible professor who does not know how to schedule a final exam. Is unreachable - get used to this - by students and TAs for 2.5 hours after the schedule time for the final exam. Lectures on and on about nothing in lectures and gets political for no reason. Selectively chooses what questions to answer and is NEVER clear about directions. AVOID!

Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
May 10, 2021
Wouldn't take again

This is one of the most difficult gen eds I have taken--professor doesn't teach during lecture. Forgot to upload our final exam at 6pm and nobody could get a hold of him- he didn't reach out until hours later saying that he apologizes. This class is way too much stress for a ged ed

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
May 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Very difficult class if you have no interest in Philosophy and are taking it as a general education credit.

1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
May 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

TA's were the life savers of this class. The only reason I got the grade I did. The mid-term was incredibly hard for a gen ed, especially a class like 1104. The final and paper were graded leniently (by the TA's), since even the TA's know how unfair the midterm was. Final was delayed to be posted, causing high anxiety. Take with another professor!

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Jul 2, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Horrible class. The short answer papers we had to write had very specific answers that aren't obvious. It's practically all luck based. Have the final exam today and don't even really care anymore bc I know it does not matter how much effort I put into the class.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Tough grader
3.0
2.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Jul 29, 2021
Would take again

A little surprised by all the harsh reviews. Bloomfield isnt terrible, as long as you put in effort youll do fine. Opportunities for meetings if you get confused with him or TA. If you dont like philosophy you probably wouldnt like his style of teaching because its fast paced. If you have a good TA youre set.

Graded by few things
So many papers
4.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Oct 28, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Bloomflied was okay. He is and intense guy but over all okay. The reading material is boring and so are the topics too. He does try to get you involved in the class but can just be too much. You have modules each week with a quiz and readings as well as a paper and final - Written out on BLACKBOARD AND LOCKDOWN. But over all it wasn't too bad

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Dec 16, 2021
Would take again

He is one inspirational lecturer. I just love his charisma. But the course is a little too tough for gen-ed. I would love to take another course with him

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
Apr 5, 2022

Just no. Avoid him at all costs. He's not worth the time and energy. He loves to talk about himself and his political beliefs. You won't learn any valuable philosophy knowledge in his class. But...he will ask you to buy his book. Don't waste your time with that either.

1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Sep 9, 2022

yeah nah.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
PHIL2215
Grade: A
Nov 8, 2022

There's just something about him that don't sit right with me. He only lectures and gets on tangents that have nothing to do with the subject matter, making it difficult to understand what is needed to know. He also refers to everyone as sri *last name* as a way of making everyone genderless but it just comes off as weird and tone deaf.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
4.0
4.0
PHIL2215
Grade: A-
Dec 15, 2022
Would take again

Bloomfield is awesome. His lectures are always fun. He wrote a whole page of feedback on my rough draft along with his edits. Always been nice.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL2215
Grade: B
Dec 16, 2022

This is the WORST professor I have ever had at UConn. Just speaks about topics randomly with no lecture notes to follow. Misguied about various topics. There is something SERIOUSLY off about this guy. Puts personal attacks on graded assignments. He removed all interest I ever had in philosophy. Avoid like the PLAGUE

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Aug 27, 2023

Essentially all reviews from the spring 2023 semester are deleted... I wonder why that might be...

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B+
Aug 27, 2023

Like previous review mentions, all 2023 reviews were deleted for rightly calling out the professor for habits that were not student friendly. Especially if taking for honors credit, don't take 1104 with Bloomfield when other professors are a lot better.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
PHIL2215
Grade: B+
Dec 6, 2023

just don't do it. by far the worst professor I've ever had. sometimes funny but most of the time gets off tangent, wastes time, often rude. take any other professor, I am begging you

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Dec 13, 2023

Worst professor. I emailed him perceived inconsistencies with the course content, he misrepresented my argument, acted like I didn't understand, and made me defend it in front of the 300+ person lecture. His writing assignment included 15+ childish instructions (i.e. stapling). He wants his students to regurgitate his ideas not think critically.

1.0
5.0
PHIL3226
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 28, 2024

I will be fair to Professor Bloomfield. He is very knowledgeable about course content and gives (often unnecessarily) scathing criticism on papers which will improve your writing. However he interacts with students in an unacceptably immature and hostile manner and presents information in a biased and closeminded way. Prone to tangents. WOULD AVOID

Tough grader
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL3226
Grade: Not sure yet
May 3, 2024

Interesting lecturer, occasionally funny. Horrible professor. Rude, personal attacks in feedback, will let you fail without gaf. Grading criteria is arbitrary ("A is a good paper" on rubric) and his address of sensitive topics is... bad. Zero information on his HuskyCT. Take it only if you're committed to writing and regurgitating his every word.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL3226
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Sep 17, 2024

Super fun guy, loved listening to him, but terrible teacher. I didn't learn anything. He didn't care that we couldn't get the books in + were falling behind. He gave horrible, rude feedback on papers that didn't help us to do better next time. The material was so confusing, especially w his bad teaching. His opinions are right, mimic them or fail

Tough grader
So many papers
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
PHIL104
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 7, 2024

Though Bloomfield is a very intelligent man, he did make me cry on three different occasions this semester. It's clear he is extremely optimistic and passionate about philosophy but is a very harsh professor and gives criticism not for the sake of improvement but for degradation. If you wanna learn but don't care about getting a C, take this class.

Tough grader
Graded by few things
3.0
4.0
PHIL3226
Grade: B
Dec 9, 2024
Would take again

I don't get the problem with Bloomfield's lecturing. True, he doesn't use slides, but if you pay attention and take notes, you should be fine. Definitely don't skip class. He's a tough grader, but fair. People complaining about his comments being "degrading" are just being sensitive. You can't learn without criticism.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A-
Dec 15, 2024

Whacko tryna shove his politics n random philosophy he himself made up down ur throat then tests u on it. Super holistic essay rubric (worth 40%), so it's not even clear how to get an A. Scathing feedback that doesn't guide you but is just there to belittle you n prolly to feed his ego. Don't take him unless u ready to get yo ahh handed to u ho.

Tough grader
Test heavy
Graded by few things
3.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B
Jan 1, 2025

Bloomfield can be an intense professor, but his lectures are engaging. The workload is manageable if you stay on top of readings and assignments. unstuck AI proved helpful for study prep alongside the textbook.

2.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: B-
Jan 20, 2025

He rambles a ton and is rarely on topic which makes everything confusing, he also loves to make his own opinions just as important as the ones he's teaching. If your taking this as an honors course just don't its awful. Entire grade is made up of midterm an essay and final.

Tough grader
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
PHIL2215
Grade: C
Apr 2, 2025

Unprofessional, condescending, aggressive, disturbed. It's not a particularly difficult class, but sitting through the lectures, listening to and watching such a loathsome person is brutal. He's poison to the soul. No evidence of significant intellectual strength, and he doesn't communicate well: the direct opposite of concision.

5.0
4.0
PHIL2215
Grade: B+
Apr 2, 2025
Would take again

best professor ive had at UCONN, he makes philosophy interesting and fun and thats saying something. theres only 2 exams and a term paper 15 pages long for grading and then participation. Weekly readings that are somewhat intensive but as long as you keep up and take notes its not too hard. hes respectful of the students and quite the personality

Get ready to read
Hilarious
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 22, 2025

I have never rated any professor before, but I have to save others from this one. His comments on papers are genuinely degrading and harsh. His lectures are not simple and are very hard to follow. He is rude and is not worth your time. DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS!

Tough grader
So many papers
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Jul 3, 2025

I tried to rate this prof before but they didnt like my language:) Please dont take this course. Prof is out of control. Uses hurtful criticism that is not constructive. His comments are invasive and harsh for no reason. If you are not willing to put in hours of effort with mininmal reward, do not take this. Take Heather Muraviov. Shes great!!!!!!!

Tough grader
Lots of homework
5.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 17, 2025
Would take again

Bro is funny and he does chat a lot before class with students. Paul knows what he's doing and when he makes mistakes he owns up to them. Bro does grade a few things, but they aren't too bad. Bro does grade hard on the long essay, but the criticism is helpful.

Inspirational
Hilarious
Graded by few things
2.0
5.0
PHIL2215
Grade: B-
Dec 2, 2025

fr kinda f this guy. assigns a final paper with unclear instructions that the class would try to discuss amongst themselves when he stepped out for a few seconds each lecture because he refused to repeat himself. got my grade back after deciphering his maze of instructions all for him to give me a C from only reading the first 2 paragraphs grrrrrr

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
PHIL1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 3, 2025

He doesn't give good feedback for essay's, it's mostly criticizing the writing instead of further explaining his markings. A lot of the time he goes on long rambles that are mostly his opinion and not actually about the topic itself.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
PHIL1104
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2025
Would take again

PHIL1104 was my favorite class this semester! Lectures were interesting, and prof used really great examples to help explain topics. Homework was typically one reading per week that we went over in class. Overall grade was based on one essay, midterm, final, and participation. If you study and pay attention in lecture, you'll do well on the exams.

Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
PHIL1104
Grade: C+
Dec 5, 2025

WORST PROFESSOR EVER DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lots of homework
1.0
5.0
1104
Grade: B-
Dec 20, 2025

Worst professor I have ever taken at Uconn. Do not take this class. There are four grades total weighted very heavly. There are so many other professors that teach this course where it is possible to get an A. He is hard to talk to, brutal, and controversial. Take this class if you want a C on one of the easiest gen eds. Worst profesor ever

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

55%

Textbook Required

24%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 62 grades
Most common grades:
B (14)
A (14)
Not sure yet (12)
Grade Distribution
A(16)B(18)C(7)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(21)
Based on 78 reported grades
B: 14
A: 14
Not sure yet: 12
A-: 11
Common Tags
Graded by few things (28)
Skip class? You won't pass. (27)
Tough grader (23)
Get ready to read (22)
Lecture heavy (21)
Participation matters (11)
LECTURE HEAVY (8)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (8)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.89 avg change
Jan
Apr
Jun
Jul
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL226

5.0

(1)

PHIL1101

5.0

(2)

PHIL3228

5.0

(1)

PHIL104

4.0

(13)

PHIL215

4.0

(1)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL3226

4.8

PHIL2215

4.1

PHIL215

4.0

PHIL3228

4.0

PHIL1104

3.5

Similar Professors