2.5

Pauline Charlton

Psychology - York University - Keele Campus

2.5
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
30%
Would Retake
147
Reviews
2.5
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
2.5
Helpful
2.5
Clarity

30%

Would Retake

147

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

30

4

14

3

29

2

20

1

54

What Students Say

A psychology professor with psychological issues

PSYCH - 1.0 rating

I was a TA for this course

PSYC2230 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

77%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 16 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (5)
A (5)
A+ (2)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(1)C(0)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 19 reported grades
B+: 5
A: 5
A+: 2
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Participation matters (9)
Get ready to read (9)
Respected (3)
Clear grading criteria (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
EXTRA CREDIT (1)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (1)
Caring (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.19 avg change
Nov
Dec
Mar
Apr
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HEALTPSYC

5.0

(1)

PSY3250

5.0

(1)

HEALT3250

5.0

(1)

SOSC1930

5.0

(1)

BIOBASOFBEHAVIO

5.0

(1)
+44 more courses
Difficulty by Course

DRUGSBEHAVIOR

5.0

HEALTHPSYCH

5.0

DRUGSBEHAV

5.0

COGNITIVEPSYCH

4.0

DRUGSBEHAVIORS

4.0

Reviews (147)
1.0
3.0
HEALTH4170
Jun 2, 2004

Terrible! She clearly doesn't like to teach. Very emotional teacher. If she likes you, you will get an A. She speaks broken English, so she is hard to understand. Stay away. Take the course from someone else!!!

1.0
5.0
HEALTH4170
Jun 17, 2004

I enrolled in this course, went to 2 classes, and then switched sections to a different prof. How can a prof teaching in the same room twice a week NOT know how to use the AV equipment! She was awful and annoying. I agree with the last rater--STAY AWAY!

4.0
3.0
HEALTH4170
Aug 3, 2004

This prof is a very boring lecturer, she has tons of material on her powerpoint presentations that she just reads off. She also structures the whole course around the topic of cancer. Her marking structure is fair.

1.0
1.0
PSYC
Feb 6, 2005

Her courses are a joke. An easy A. Even though she can barely speak english her exams are easy. You don't even need to show up to her lectures. Her TA is more proactive than she is. She's not very helpful though with students wishing to pursue graduate studies.

4.0
2.0
ANIMALSDRUGS
Mar 11, 2005

I agree she isn't the most interesting professor however we are here to get good grades. shes uses very easy to understand textbooks, shows fun movies a lot, and is very sweet. she lets you know exactly what to expect from exams.

1.0
4.0
COGNITIVEPSYCH
Apr 10, 2005

This prof was horrible! I don't usually say this about any prof, but she is surely the worst prof I've ever had! She doesn't care about her students, doesn't teach well at all, and just doesn't seem to care about the topics she discusses either, which makes lectures even more boring.

1.0
3.0
ANIMALBEHAVIOUR
Apr 20, 2005

HOW ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH DID SHE BECOME A PROFESSOR?? SURE SHE MAY HAVE HAD THE MARKS, BUT WHAT THE HELL?? U DON'T EVEN HAVE 2 GO 2 HER CLASS, STAY HOME AND READ THE TXT FOR GOD SAKE!CAN'T SPEAK PROPERLY AND THE WEIRDEST THINGS MAKE HER LAUGH!! NO ONE ELSE LAUGHS,JUST HER!

1.0
1.0
ANIMALBEHAVIOR
Apr 26, 2005

hoenstly, the worst prof and the most boring lectures in my 3 years at york. her lectures consist of reading from the textbook word for word.

1.0
3.0
PSYCH3260
Apr 27, 2005

BORING,says inappropriate things in class,seems very uninterested in lectures,has material in the exams that is neither in the text or lectures,in a nutshell- a BAD PROF.

1.0
3.0
DRUGSBEHAVIOUR
May 17, 2005

Horrible! All she did was read parts of the textbook aloud to us in class. She doesn't seem to know much about what she is teaching or seem very interested in teaching it. You really have to teach the course to yourself, because she is not helpful at all. Her lectures are quite boring.

1.0
5.0
DRUGSBEHAVIOR
Jun 13, 2005

not very bright.. she has a profound difficulty explaining the material, and often incorrectly presents the material from the text... apparently pavlov did his research on cats!!! (hey charlton, don't confuse your food groups!)

2.0
3.0
PSYC3260
Jun 17, 2005

Prof. had waaayy to many ambiguous, unclear questions on the multiple choice exams. For those exams it must be very clear. Know I could have had an A in the course, but didn't due to the lack of clarity.

1.0
4.0
DRUGSBEHAVIORS
Jun 27, 2005

difficult MC tests, "you guys should know more than I do" is what she always says to us...hey! I thought we are here to learn something...apparently we have to study the textbook our own because her notes are all copied from the text...i wonder how she got her PhD...-_-

2.0
4.0
PSYCH3590
Aug 20, 2005

The class was easy in that you just needed to know the textbook material to do well. BUT although she seemed clear on what to expect for the exams, they turned out to be difficult and the opposite to what she promised!!!

2.0
3.0
PSYC3590
Sep 7, 2005

She's very rude, and doesn't seem to be knowlegable about her area of "expertise". She doesn't engage her students in discussion at all, and her lectures are very bland. She doesn't really expand on what the textbook states either.

1.0
2.0
HEALTHPSYC
Oct 12, 2005

Just finished the midterm (Oct 12,05).. I can say the test was horrible. She pormised no DATE, NAME and questions related to USA but apparently there was more than 20 questions in this field! Here notes for studying the exam is USELESS and has mistake and she focused mainly on BOOK.. UNFAIR AND UNCLEAR TEST. take it with another prof!

1.0
5.0
HEALTHPSYC
Nov 11, 2005

I am very disapointed, I love to know how yorku hires these kind of profs, what is their values??she isn't helpfull at all, she wants students to fail, and if u email her about a class u missed she will not tell you what u missed, she is a freak. if you study the book very well you'll do ok, not goo, just ok.I wish we could do something about these

1.0
1.0
HEALTHPSYC
Nov 11, 2005

No Comments

1.0
5.0
DRUGSANDBEHAV
Grade: B+
Nov 25, 2005

ATTENTION STUDENTS: DROP THIS CLASS IMMEDIATELY! IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO COMPLAIN ON THIS SITE! WRITE A FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE PSYCH DEPT. ACTUALLY TRY TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND TAKE A STAND, SO FAR I AM THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS FORMALLY COMPLAINED ABOUT THIS PROF. PLEASE JOIN ME IN HELPING "RETIRE" PAULINE!

2.0
5.0
HEALTHPSYCH
Dec 3, 2005

The exam items are taken from the instructor's test bank and they are very tricky questions, so you better know the textbook for the most part (i.e., memorize the book). What ever happened to simple knowledge questions? The lectures are not very engaging and too little emphasis, at first, was placed on the textbook and too much on additional info.

1.0
5.0
DRUGSBEHAVIOUR
Dec 13, 2005

do yourself a favour and do NOT take a course with this professor. She has nothing to say about the topic other than what she spits out of the textbook and asks the most insanely specific questions on her tests (ie. specific percentages from US stats with MC options within 1% of each other) after PROMISING not to put specific stats on her exam.

3.0
3.0
DB
Dec 21, 2005

Just memorize the text and you'll be fine. No need to attend class. Not the worst prof. but doesn't appear to have any interest in teaching.

2.0
5.0
DRUGSBEHAVIOUR
Dec 22, 2005

Being an Education student, I wonder how she was approved to teach at York. Her notes are replicas of the text, she never engages the class in discussions, and the exams are very difficult. If you are good at memorizing the text you will be lucky to get a B in the course. Overall one of the worst profs I've had. You encourage failure and notsuccess

1.0
3.0
ANIMALBEHAVIOR
Jan 9, 2006

Just went 2 her 1st day class & then dropped the course.She doesnt have any interest in da subject she is taching!The course outline was not ready till the 2nd half of class and she started teaching chapter3,EVOLUTION skipping the whole Chapters 1,2! Save yourself and your money by dropping the course and signing the PETITION agains her!

1.0
3.0
DRUGSANDBEHAV
Jan 14, 2006

All she does is go through her power-point presentations, regurgitating the text book word for word (no personal input). Charlton's voice is annoying (barely understandable), she hates what she does, she gets mad when you ask her questions, etc. You Can do good in her class...but do you really have the patience to put up with her for a semester?

1.0
5.0
DRUGSBEHAV
Jan 18, 2006

Oh my God! AHHHH!! I hate Pauline...went to her first two lectures and realized that she was unbearable...worst prof in the existence of professors! She has no idea how to teach, or keep her students interested! I'm telling you, you take a course with her and you'll become a manic depressant! Stick to profs like Luther, Eastwood, Bauer, etc.

1.0
4.0
ANIMALBEHAVIOR
Jan 31, 2006

HOLY****!!! this class is supposed to be interesting, I am learning nothing, she can't pronounce words & doesn't even deliver the material to us through her overheads that she can't keep on for more than 2minutes!! SHE SUX

3.0
2.0
DRUGSBEHAVIOUR
Feb 1, 2006

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ANIMALBEHVR
Feb 1, 2006

STOP COMPLAININ r you kiddin me,not enough room to complain about how this prof is awful, doesn't teach anything,can't even pronouce her wrds,wont leave the overheads on long enough for us to c wht is basically the txt book repeated!! Omg...i wanna die after her lecture, start smokin drugs & shave my ankles! DROP IT IF YOU CAN,please retire NOW!

1.0
1.0
DRUGSANDBEHAV
Mar 6, 2006

WORST PROF IVE HAD IN 4 YEARS! I dont even go to the class b/c I cant stand listening to her. Her exams are full of mistakes and she has no idea what shes talking about for the most part. How is she a prof at York??? Even her T.A. thinks shes an idiot.

1.0
2.0
BIOBASIS
Mar 8, 2006

Apart from not speaking English properly, not knowing anything about the course material, having broken english on her overheads, not letting students copy anything down and being beyond useless at all times, she's a good prof... oh wait, thats all there is to being a prof. She can't have a degree, you'd need to be literate to get one.

1.0
3.0
DRUGSANDBEHAV
Mar 15, 2006

wow! THE lasiest prof I have ever had. Teaches right out of the text, and offers no extra material. Honestly, the text was easier to understand than her. Her tests are brutal and she makes class soo boring. How is this woman still able to teach? Her knees must be pretty sore! Please don't waste your tuition on her!

4.0
2.0
ANIMALS
Mar 27, 2006

THE PROFF IS REALLY BORING HER LECTURES ARE WORD FOR WORD OUT OF THE TEXTBOOK BUT THANK GOD SHE ONLY LECTURES FOR AN HOUR AND THE REST OF THE TIME IS SPENT WATCHING REALLY CUTE AND INTERESTING VIDEOS. HER TESTS ARE MC AND SHORT ANSWER. NOT BAD. SOME Q'S ARE WIERD AND SPECIFIC BUT A'S ARE ATTAINABLE. HEIDI THE TA IS REALLY SWEET AND APPROACHABLE.

1.0
4.0
PSYCH3590
Mar 31, 2006

is a real cow, her exams have too many mistakes, she distrubs u at least 10 times in exams to correct mistakes, cant speak proper english, her lectures are word for word from the textbook, so please dont copy nething down in the lectures. her TA does not seem to like her either.

3.0
2.0
PSYC3280
Apr 11, 2006

I don't get why ppl are so down on this prof.Although her english isn't the BEST,U CAN understand her.Her lecture notes R right from the textbook HOWEVER we watched a lot of videos in class and a lot of test questions came from the videos.This year our T.A. rocked(Heidi)and was willing to help students out.Both are very passionate about their work.

2.0
4.0
DRUGS3590
Apr 13, 2006

Simply atrocious. Worst course I've taken at York. Too bad too, because someone who actually knew something about the material could have made it interesting. Her "lectures" consisted of her reading powerpoint slides that she (or someone) copied word for word out of the textbook but WITH MISTAKES. No reason to go to class except comedic value.

3.0
2.0
ANIMALBEH
Apr 30, 2006

Easy course. Slides are from the text. Video's were great. Must go to class for video's. Easy to get an A. Her English is a little off but you can still understand her. Would take another course from her ... Just for the A.

4.0
1.0
ANIMALBEHAVIOU
Apr 30, 2006

If you can read and watch movies, you can get a A in this class! Read the text, watch the movies...EASY! m/c exams...EASY!

1.0
3.0
PSYC3590
May 5, 2006

Worst prof i've ever had! She makes an interesting topic very boring! All she does is copy paragraphs from the text! Basically there is no point in attenting lecture. She is also very unorganized. Her first test is easy but the second is killer. Study every word! She asks 130Q from 100 pages of material! Very unhelpful, stick to contacting the T.A.

2.0
1.0
DRUGSANDBEHAV
Jun 14, 2006

This is a VERY EASY COURSE. if you know how to watch movies and read the text ... you will pass with flying colours! However, attending the lectures is just a waste of your time. Lecture notes are straight from the text, usually with mistakes (so ALWAYS go by the text .. no matter what she says). She is a **** but T.A is nice :)

3.0
3.0
ANIMALBEHAVIOR
Jun 16, 2006

Not very good at lecturing. She reads right off the slides, which are jam packed with info, and move through her power points too fast. Not very clear. However, most of the lectures are straight out of the book and if you study hard you should be ok. Her tests were fair over all with a few random items.

3.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Aug 10, 2006

I took her motivation course in the summer and i did really well. I got A's on both her exams which i thought were hard but the ta marks easy. Her tests were mostly m/c with 10-15 terms and on the second there were s/a. Honestly she's not that bad I personally liked her however she has an accent but its ok cuz she posts all the lecture notes.

1.0
5.0
PSYC3250
Oct 21, 2006

horrible!!!!

3.0
1.0
DRUGSBEHA
Nov 22, 2006

Honestly, people are exaggerating just a bit. She is very difficult to understand and does regurgitate the book... but it's an easy A!!! i mean the exams are M/C, and you just need to study the textbook! I'd recom. this class for the A and interesting text, but if you prefer an interactive prof, you shouldn't take this class

2.0
3.0
PSYCH3250
Dec 18, 2006

I don't know what to write. A terrible lecturer, there is not much of an accent problem as people say. The problem is her boring style. Moreover, her exams are strictly from the textbook, so there is no need to go to class. She pulls obscure references that have no meaning to the class for mc. I would avoid in the future.

2.0
4.0
PSYCH3590
Feb 21, 2007

she's sooooooooooooooooooooo BORINGGGGGGGGGG.. and she makes you so frustrated in class because she can never pronounce anything properly

4.0
1.0
DRUGS3590
Feb 25, 2007

Listen, we live in Canada, a multicultural country filled with diversity. Not everyone can speak English fluently, so stop bashing Charlton! SO GROW UP PEOPLE, YOU'RE IN UNIVERSITY. Just go to lecture, study the book and you'll get your A. Its that easy! There are profs out there that are much worse than Charlton, believe me!

4.0
1.0
PSYC3280
Apr 13, 2007

I really liked this class. She was very entertaining (told weird stories, etc) and showed at least one interesting movie EVERY class. She had a thick accent but it didn't matter because everything she said was in the book, which was short and the most interesting textbook I ever had. Tests were VERY easy if you read the book and saw the movies.

1.0
4.0
PSYC3590
May 16, 2007

I don't even know where to begin with this prof. She couldn't teach a fish how to swim. I don't care if Canada is a multicultural hub, she has an unacceptably poor handle on the English language. Her tests were completely random. Avoid her like the plague!

3.0
1.0
PSYC3590
May 18, 2007

She was great in my opinion. Lots of ignorant people in my class that gave her a hard time though. Her tests were not random, it was straight from the book, or straight from lecture. If you didn't know where the question came from, it's your own fault. I worked hard and got an A+,don't blame the professor for your own inadequate academic attitudes.

2.0
4.0
PSYC3150
May 21, 2007

one of the worst professors i have had at york. literally reads off the slides. I mean the mouse cursor follows on the the slides as she reads off of them. rude with no sense of decency towards her students. Plus, she doesnt even know the right answers on her tests. I asked her a question once and she had check the answer first. Avoid this woman.

5.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Aug 19, 2007

i dont understand you many of you rated Charlton bad, i had motivation with her and shes not bad at all, she was funny at times and yes boring at times but if u study the text and approach her for help when nedded ull be fine, plus her accent was not hard to understand at all and English is not my first language, she is better then many other profs

3.0
2.0
COGNPYSCH
Dec 31, 2007

i think she was cool. she's cute and throws little jokes in that aren't really funny but make you laugh anyway. Her slides are RIGHT OUT of the text and she lectures right from the slides. but it makes the course easy b/c you just have to read the text for exams. read the text in and out and you'll get a good mark. dont need to go to lecture.

3.0
2.0
PSYCHCOG
Dec 31, 2007

her accent is fine, it is not harsh at all. and anyone who thinks that her english is bad, just needs to get out more. we're multicultural people, learn different accents.

4.0
1.0
PSYC3250
Mar 23, 2008

Are you kidding me? This prof's test are incredibly easy. I have an A+ and I don't even attend lecture. Sure she's a bit hard to understand, but that by no means, should prevent you from getting a good grade. Read the book. Take more responsibility for your grades. Just don't do the bare minimum through out and then **** and moan about a B/B+.

2.0
2.0
PSYC2240
Mar 31, 2008

Struggling!

4.0
3.0
PSYC3590
Apr 11, 2008

Dr. Charlton is a good professor. And as what one has already mentioned stop bashing her and blaming her for poor grade. University teaches us to be independent in our learning and more open minded towards others shortcomings. I took Drugs and Behavior and Neural Basis of Behavior with her.

2.0
4.0
PSYCHHEAL
May 5, 2008

very unclear teaching

3.0
4.0
PSYC2230
Sep 30, 2008

She's okay. At times she just read the powerpoint but sometimes she needs to explain a little more. She does have an accent so you have listen more. Her tests are a little long but fair and if you study you'll get a good grade. I got B.

5.0
2.0
HEALTPSYC
Oct 4, 2008

loved her! nicest prof ever. Very helpful Her tests aren't that hard, just study well. Very approachable, just be curteous and you'll get the same back.

4.0
2.0
PSYC3250
Nov 2, 2008

Easy course. Her accent is not at all difficult to understand. The lecture notes are POINTLESS-- a lot of info that she summarizes. Just study the textbook and you'll be fine. She might be a bad/boring lecturer but her tests are EASY!!!!!!! TAKE IT!!!

5.0
3.0
PSYC3170
Jan 27, 2009

Very nice professor. Really know her stuff and very personable. She is very easily approached and talk to. Be respectful, and she will respond to you nicely.

5.0
4.0
PSY3250
Jan 28, 2009

very good professor, knows her subject and is very respnsive to hard questions.Her Classes are fun

5.0
3.0
PSYC3250
Feb 1, 2009

I like the quizzes she gave every week because she keep me updated with the classes. Since this course is very scientific, it helps a lot. I enjoy her classes very much!

5.0
4.0
PSYC3170
Feb 2, 2009

She was extremely helpful in encouraging me to apply to professional schools. Very good with students, especially people who had indicated to her that they need her help. Lots of personal attention.

5.0
4.0
PSYC3250
Feb 4, 2009

Just love her! Soooo considerate after the strike. I think that she is very fair!!

5.0
4.0
PSYC3250
Feb 10, 2009

this prof is tops, too bad some of her students are ethnical negatively biased.

5.0
4.0
PSYC3170
Feb 10, 2009

super prof, knows subject and lecture very well, fun class

5.0
3.0
HEALT3250
Feb 11, 2009

Very nice prof, friendly and approachable, hard work, but learn a lot

5.0
3.0
PSYC3250
Mar 17, 2009

Very scientific, some students are rude, and ethnically biased!! I did well, but a lot dropped out or did not get the grade they wanted.

2.0
2.0
PSYC2230
May 25, 2009

Easy class & she's nice...but also a disaster-her accent is fine, she just can't answer questions about her own slides! Study the text and you'll be fine-95% of the Q's are from the test bank. Class is a complete waste of time altho she tries to convince you it's important-go a few times and you'll see. Thankfully,the TA Tony DeBono was the best!

5.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Jul 14, 2009

wonderful personality, very helpful to students, big smile, most different from many other profs, her tests are fair and usually gives fast feedback, I recommend her to my friends!

5.0
4.0
PSYC3250
Jul 14, 2009

very, very good prof,knowlegable and presents super well, good use of visuals. Her TA is the pits not very helpful but they are assigned by a weak admin., person.

3.0
4.0
PSYCH2230
Jul 17, 2009

very disappointed the way this prof.handle the question.she get upset easily.read the text,class is waste of time

5.0
4.0
PSYC2230
Sep 3, 2009

personable, nice, upbeat personality, she was very helpful when I approached her with my essay and asked for help. I got a good mark.

3.0
5.0
PSYCH3250
Feb 11, 2010

This prof is among the worst I've had at York. Emphasized material to study in class, while minimizing other material, and the things she emphasized WERE NOT on her exams. Seems intent on misleading students with regards to material to study. I love this material, and she made me hate the class. Basically, memorize everything; unfair for 3rd year.

2.0
3.0
PSYC3250
Apr 11, 2010

Basically the worst teacher I have ever had. She wasn't mean, or necessarily unfair...but the lectures were SOOOOO boring, and all she did was read from the slides, adding NO insight whatsoever. I absolutely dreaded the class. Her accent was too much for me and mis-pronounced a lot of the terminology wrong as a result. Ugh...

1.0
5.0
HREQ1930
Apr 15, 2010

WORST prof i've had in 4 years! Powerpoints are horrible - just filled with paragraphs that are hard to read, tests are REDICULOUSLY hard for a first year course, she can't clarify any questions, and she remarks papers that the TAs mark and in many cases lowered the mark

1.0
5.0
HREQ1930
Apr 19, 2010

Wow... the worst proff Ive ever had. She cannot teach, do not take this course if you dont have to!!!!!! Class average was a C.

1.0
2.0
HREQ1930
Jul 5, 2010

She is awful!! All the above comments are 100% true!! Please avoid if possible. I don't know how she is still teaching.

1.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Jul 26, 2010

This Professor was horrible, all her lectures came from the text book yet she wanted us to always attend class. If someone asked for help, she either refused to answer or didnt know the answer. its easy to get a good mark if u dont attend, once u study from the text. But she really annoyed me.

5.0
1.0
SOSC1930
Aug 13, 2010

everyone taking this course must be a dumb ass, because I did very well from by attending lectures and skimming the text. exams are very fair, with long answer Q's given in advance, and the essay marks were quite high. semi-interesting class, nice prof. her accent is fine, I didn't have any trouble understanding her. 25% of the class got an A.

1.0
5.0
HREQ1930
Aug 17, 2010

She is by far the worst most self righteous professor I have ever had. She refuses to acknowledge when she is mistaken, and she does not take it lightly when you challenger her. She is dismissive and passive aggressive. I seriously think this woman should not teach. Her slides are pointless and she does not post them, her exams are purposefully tri

1.0
3.0
PSYC3170
Dec 23, 2010

She's always late for class. In spite of the course and the book being very interesting, she isn't able to make her lectures interesting. Slides are very bad, with "paragraphs" on each slide. She just reads off the slides. She is not able to explain concepts when you go for help. Tests are fair.

5.0
1.0
HREQ1930
Jan 6, 2011

Super easy! Was EXTREMELY clear on what she wanted us to study (pretty much gave us the ?'s), and always repeats things things out loud (even 3 times is we miss it). She dislikes when people talk in class, but an easy 10% of our final mark is awarded just for attending. Very interesting class; very knowledgeable & passionate prof. Cute/humourous!

5.0
4.0
PSYC3170
Mar 9, 2011

She was very helpful in advicing me about my career choice. She was honest and is an expert in her field.

3.0
2.0
PSYC3170
Apr 13, 2011

The previous negative ratings are really not accurate. I took Health Psych with Charlton and enjoyed the course. She posted nearly all the lecture slides online and made the tests fair. I got an A+ by taking detailed notes from the textbook and attending all the lectures (movies are important). I love that she finished every class 1 hour early!

3.0
1.0
HREQ1930
May 24, 2011

A few things I can tell you. her class is not interesting and she does not seem interested either but I found to be be very easy get an A+ I almost did not study the book at all except for the few pages she told us. Overall you will practice patience since the classes are mandatory and useless but you will be successful if you are a good student.

5.0
3.0
PSYC3170
Oct 12, 2011

I find her very helpful. Some students are not fair in their comments.

3.0
1.0
PSYC2230
Nov 18, 2011

Yes she isn't clear 100% of the time but overall I enjoy her humor. Her class always finishes an hour early so that is always an added bonus. As for the course itself its broken down into 3 tests (40/40/20%), all MC! There were no surprise questions as long as you went to class and did the readings. I aced this class and learned alot of useful info

4.0
2.0
PSYCH2012
Jan 11, 2012

Straightforward, clear and the course tests are weighed 40/40/20. But honestly it's boring and hard to sit through. She is helpful and posts all the lectures and does drop test questions in class so attendance is recommended. To be fair she is a decent prof. but I have had better.

5.0
4.0
PSYC2240
May 31, 2012

She is a wonderful professor, friendly and humorous. I enjoyed her class and got pretty good grade. Best of all, I learned a lot.

5.0
4.0
PSYC3250
Jun 8, 2012

of the 10 top professors i have had over the last two years dr charlton ranks in the top i give her a 9.5 out of ten. Knows her stuff, and presents it very well. would be willing to do research withher at any time.

3.0
2.0
PSYCS1
Jun 25, 2012

She tests you on things mentioned only in class, so make sure you attend. She often goes against what the textbook says, but then she uses the textbook to make questions. If she ever says something contrary to the book, USE THE BOOK!!! A VERY sweet and kind woman, very lovely to chat with ! Very warm and approachable

3.0
4.0
MOTIV2230
Aug 15, 2012

ok prof. Can be approachable, but at the same time can be difficult to 'get to', depending what the issue is. Overall ok prof, had better and worst.. so it's up to you. I wouldn't recommend this course as there's much more interesting and just overall better courses like Abnormal Psyc for example.

1.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Dec 3, 2012

Avoid this professor at all costs! although an A+ is attainable it is NOT worth the stress this professor put me through ALL year... you are better off taking a different course (with half the amount of work you will get an A+) if you like ot meet with your prof's duiring office hours. than goodluck.. this prof holds none (never did!)

1.0
5.0
PSYC2230
Dec 11, 2012

HORRIBLE PROF! HARD TO UNDERSTAND, BORING LECTURES. EXAMS ARE DIFFICULT. WORST PSYCHOLOGY COURSE TAKEN.

3.0
4.0
PSYCH2230
Feb 14, 2013

Although she did make jokes throughout the class & she was nice, as a professor she is not good. It's important to attend class because videos & information on slides are on the exams (& some of the information is not on the book so you HAVE to learn it, it's guaranteed to be on the exams.) A is possible, but you obviously have to work hard for it.

4.0
3.0
2230
Mar 25, 2013

she shows interesting videos. she is a nice prof but her class is a bit boring.

3.0
1.0
PSYC3250
Apr 16, 2013

At the beginning of the semester I really did not like her. By the end though, she did kind of grow on me, as she is a nice person & enthusiastic about the material BUT she is NOT a good prof. Lectures are very boring, but important to attend because she'll tell you which figures will be on the short answer section of the exam. Exams are easy tho!

1.0
5.0
PSYC2230
Apr 22, 2013

I was a TA for this course. I have worked with more than five different profs as a TA and this woman is by far the worst experience I've had. She does not understand the material and is regularly rude and arrogant towards students.

1.0
3.0
PSYC1010
Jul 4, 2013

It is impossible to understand what she says. Does not go over anything that will be on the exam. She just talks about what she thinks is interesting. She talked about a book she thought was interesting for the first hour of one class. Going to class in completely useless. Thank goodness this was a really easy class where her help was not needed!

5.0
4.0
PSYC3250
Jul 30, 2013

She was one of my best professor I have met at York. She was supportive, kind and knows her topic. I find most students are unfair because they are prejudice.

5.0
3.0
PSYC1010
Jul 30, 2013

She was a good professor, but the class of students were of poor quality.

1.0
4.0
PSYCH2230
Oct 25, 2013

This professor was very unorganized and showed lots of movies,most of which we were tested on and were completely irrelevant to the course. I would highly recommend avoiding her classes.

1.0
3.0
PSYCH
Feb 18, 2014

A psychology professor with psychological issues. We watched a movie about the benefits of laughter and she made a note of saying we should laugh more and enjoy what we do. She later made a joke and the class laughed, she then accused us of laughing at her and suggest we should be quiet and not make fun of the professor we might learn something.

1.0
4.0
PSYC2240
Apr 10, 2014

She was one of the worst profs I've ever had. She said the class could start at 9 instead of 8:30, but showed videos before 9 on which we could be tested. She answered questions WRONG and on several occasions a student had to intervene to answer questions for another student. She was less than helpful; I didn't learn anything from her.

2.0
3.0
PSYC3260
Apr 27, 2014

Doesn't grade too hard. Takes attendance at the start of every class. Read the text and you'll do fine.

5.0
1.0
BIOBASOFBEHAVIO
Grade: A+
Jun 27, 2014

Honestly, Forget what everyone else is saying, i'm sure they were just all lazy. This professor is the easiest professor you can take. Also very kind and loving. Attend class if possible and definitely read the textbook.

3.0
4.0
PSYC2240
Apr 2, 2015

It was unfortunate that many movies were shown and lecture time was never longer then one hour. This was disappointing for the money and time invested. She seemed to struggle with the material herself. Fascinating material but presented poorly.

3.0
3.0
2240
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 20, 2015

Professor Charlton is by far the best Professor at York. I would for sure sign up for another course taught by her. Her exams are very straight forward. If you attend class and do the readings you're all set. Participation is worth 5%, which means just attend class and sign in and you have that easy 5%.

3.0
3.0
PSYC2240
Apr 20, 2015

I'm not a big fan of biology topics but this was a very doable course. I would for sure sign up for another course taught by her. Her exams are very straight forward. If you attend class and do the readings you're all set. Participation is worth 5%, which means just attend class and sign in and you have that easy 5%.

4.0
2.0
PSYC2230
May 5, 2015

Kind Professor. I'm very disappointed to see some comments to manipulate and scare students who want to take a nice and easy class. Very simple equation to obtain good grade at her class: Attend lectures + Study the book & slides + Pay meticulous attention to videos B+ to A+ Grade. 3 exams, All multiple choice based questions (40%-40%-20%).

1.0
2.0
PSYC2240
Sep 18, 2015

If you want a good mark, take her class. If you want to learn "absolutely nothing" in class, take her class. How to pass? Read text and watch videos.

2.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Nov 6, 2015

Reading off of the slides and telling stories that are irrelevant to the course is her strategy of "teaching". She is very unstructured and unorganized, makes students feel like she does not care. If you want to do well read the book, watch the videos, and show up to class for the participation Mark.

2.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Nov 16, 2015

Her lectures are extremely boring. She reads off the slides and is very unstructured and unorganized. There are mistakes on every 2 slides of her powerpoint and it is truly one of the worst class/prof I've had ... If you want to do well on the test, you easily can by reading the book, watching videos and showing up to class for participation marks

5.0
4.0
MOTIV2230
Dec 6, 2015

She is the BEST professor I have ever had at York.

5.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Grade: A
Dec 13, 2015

I absolutely enjoyed this course, particularly inspired by her positive psychology lecture.

3.0
4.0
PSYC2230
Dec 28, 2015

There is no point attending the lectures. She speaks in monotone and makes very lame jokes. I could never sit through half the lecture. Tests are easy if you read the textbook and watch all the videos she assigns. The videos aren't always in the slides so be careful.

5.0
4.0
PSYC2230
Grade: B+
Jan 14, 2016

She is amazing!! I really enjoyed her lectures. She made me laugh in every class and kept me engaged. Really helpful when you ask her for help or clarification. I would take another course with her!

3.0
3.0
MOTIV2230
Grade: B+
Aug 25, 2016
Would take again

I took this course last year, only attended class for the 3 tests and received a B+ just by going over the lecture notes online. I never opened the book. You will receive 5% at the end of the term if you attend class because she takes attendance. I still got the 5% even though I only attended class 3 times. Thanks Prof!

Respected
Participation matters
EXTRA CREDIT
3.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Grade: B
Dec 12, 2016
Would take again

You get 5% for attending class. She can be difficult to hear if you're sitting at that back. Tests are straight forward. If you read the textbook and look at the lecture slides you should be fine.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
3.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Grade: B+
Dec 22, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Not the most interesting class in the world, but not the worst. Her slide content is much less compared to the textbook so I recommend you don't slack on doing the readings before hand. She uses a lot of videos in her lecture (some which you won't be able to find after) Go to class to save yourself the hassle. It was a pretty okay course.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
PSYCH2230
Grade: A
Dec 27, 2016
Would take again

One of the most nicest professors i have ever had. Dr. Charlton is a great human being. She's funny, understanding, and very down to earth. The textbook was boring but i found that her power point slides and vids helped a lot. If You're reading this professor, may God bless you.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Caring
3.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Grade: A
Mar 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Atrociously difficult to follow along during lectures, her accent doesn't really help either. I am a 8.08 GPA 3rd year student who barely got through with an A. Uses alot of videos as well as 5% participation, which means that you've gotta sit through her boring classes. Tests were 35/45/20 in weighting, all MC, nothing special, no surprises.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
1.0
PSYC2230
Grade: A
Apr 6, 2017
Would take again

Whoever complains is blaming their shortcomings on the professor, when truth is it is due to lack of effort. The class average was an A. If you attended class... you would have received an A. I only read what was bolded from the textbook (definitions), attended class, watched the videos once the day before the test and finished with an A

1.0
4.0
PSYC2230
Oct 27, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Why do we have to wait a month until allowed to review the test? Her lecture is boring and occasionally confusing. She spends more time on keeping a tight control on everything than on improving the lecture. I'm thinking about quitting.

2.0
4.0
MOTIV2230
Nov 21, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Her lectures are boring and hard to get through. I found the textbook she uses to be extremely dry and boring, the textbook talks more about experiments about a concept than actually explaining what the concept is. The tests expects you to remember almost all experiments and very fine details in the text. She's a nice prof, I just don't enjoy her.

TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
3.0
MOTIV2230
Grade: A-
Nov 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Whomever said that the class average is A, that's a liar. In the summer course I took, as well as the one earlier taken by my friend, the average was slightly above 60. It took me a lot efforts to receive A-.

1.0
4.0
MOTIV2230
Dec 4, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Test questions are rediculous.

1.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Dec 9, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She shows us too many videos and provides us very poorly composed tests. After the test, we had to wait for an entire month before allowed to look at our tests. I don't understand why.

1.0
5.0
PSYC3170
Grade: Incomplete
Jan 11, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This is my 2nd lecture with her. She does not explain any concepts, she simply reads HER lecture notes. Someone asked a question if she could explain glucocorticoid effects and she told Class she doesnt know youll have to learn it herself! I personally spoke with her and shes not a caring prof. Shes tenure so not worried about losing her job.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
3.0
MOTIV2230
Grade: B+
Jan 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She simply doesn't care about student progress and finishes the job with as little effort as possible. Go ahead if you absolutely need the credit, but besides that you won't get anything else.

1.0
3.0
PSYC3170
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

A girl got up and asked her privately about recording lectures, she proceeded to shout loudy in front of a FULL lecture hall, belitting us saying "obviously you can't read". Doesn't allow for a break during a 3 hour lecture then complains about people getting up and leaving - stopping the lecture to yell about it. Cannot answer questions you ask.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
4.0
PSYC3170
Feb 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Honestly don't enjoy this class at all. The information isn't bad but the way she teaches is not very helpful. She reads off her slides and isn't able to answer questions, she instead says to google it yourself. She goes on tangents mid lecture about how people have no manners and how people leave early but she doesn't give breaks for a 3 hr class

1.0
4.0
PSYC3170
Feb 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This prof is the absolute worst Ive ever had. Her lectures are useless and painful to sit through and she assigns an impossible amount of weekly reading - like 4 times the reading load of any other course Im taking . Its extremely overwhelming. Feels as if the odds are stacked against you in this course.

Get ready to read
1.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Mar 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

All the blame for my disappointment in this course falls on Prof. Charlton. I am all for inclusivity, but if you're teaching a course in english, you would think there would some standard on your ability to speak it. She did not compensate for her linguistic shortcomings, as the lectures were often spent on useless, irrelevant material.

1.0
4.0
MOTIV2230
Grade: A-
Jul 27, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Avoid this professor if you can. She apparently doesn't care about what she was teaching or weather students are learning. She shows way too much video and when she doesn't, she reads of the slides. She couldn't answer questions. She has some emotional problems and shouted to several students in front of everybody.

1.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Oct 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Her English is very poor. Her lectures are basically incomprehensible. It's a shame. She knows the material, but can't communicate it clearly

Participation matters
5.0
3.0
MOTIV2230
Oct 19, 2018
Would take again

I do not know why professor Charlton has such a low rating. I say this because, despite the class being a little tough to get thru and the textbook being dry, her exams are extremely fair. So, if you come to class, listen, take notes and read the textbook, it is easy to get an A.

Respected
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
MOTIV2230
Nov 23, 2018
Would take again

Awesome prof! I got low marks but she's still great haha! Just study the book for most part to get an A. All respect for Dr. Charlton <3 Thank you for teaching us effectively (in case you're reading this)

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
PSYC2230
Dec 1, 2018
Would take again

she is amazingggg

Respected
Hilarious
1.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Grade: A
Mar 27, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Ive never cared enough to write a review. I swear she doesnt know what shes talking about- made up facts about known psychological experiments , events , and people. She forces attendance because otherwise no one would go. Shes also not very receptive to talking after class and not very friendly. Please avoid if you can, youre welcome.

Skip class? You won't pass.
3.0
1.0
PSYC2230
Apr 1, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Honestly prof Pauline isnt that bad , if you read the text book you will be fine .she reeds off her pwp. I have to add that she isnt so friendly . when you ask her a question she expect you to know the answer to everything . She can be very difficult sometimes specially during midterm shes so LOUD! YOU lose focus :

4.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Apr 8, 2019
Would take again

She is amazing and nice. You need to study the notes and the textbook to do well in this course. The questions from the textbook are very clear and direct, she doesn't ask detailed questions from the textbook. I find this to be a good thing because the readings are a lot. Make sure you know the bolded concepts, she also gives 5% for attendance.

2.0
2.0
PSYC2230
Grade: A+
May 24, 2019
Wouldn't take again

very boring and very dry lecturer and just reads off the slides. tests are both lecture and readings, and the textbook is also a pain. she also takes attendance randomly for participation marks which forces you to go to every lecture. overall this course is not very interesting so look into other options.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
2.0
3.0
2230
Grade: D+
Dec 12, 2024

she was so meh bro i just couldn't deal. dropped the course.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

77%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 16 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (5)
A (5)
A+ (2)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(1)C(0)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 19 reported grades
B+: 5
A: 5
A+: 2
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Participation matters (9)
Get ready to read (9)
Respected (3)
Clear grading criteria (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
EXTRA CREDIT (1)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (1)
Caring (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.19 avg change
Nov
Dec
Mar
Apr
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HEALTPSYC

5.0

(1)

PSY3250

5.0

(1)

HEALT3250

5.0

(1)

SOSC1930

5.0

(1)

BIOBASOFBEHAVIO

5.0

(1)
+44 more courses
Difficulty by Course

DRUGSBEHAVIOR

5.0

HEALTHPSYCH

5.0

DRUGSBEHAV

5.0

COGNITIVEPSYCH

4.0

DRUGSBEHAVIORS

4.0

Similar Professors