3.3

Pete Anderson

Biology - University of Wisconsin - Madison

3.3
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
67%
Would Retake
351
Reviews
3.3
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
3.3
Helpful
3.4
Clarity

67%

Would Retake

351

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
351 total ratings

5

84

4

120

3

72

2

45

1

30

What Students Say

Professor was a great guy, but I had trouble staying focused during lecture

NS132 - 2.0 rating

Horrible organization

NS132 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

25%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 84 grades
Most common grades:
A (32)
B (18)
A- (13)
Grade Distribution
A(35)B(25)C(7)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(17)
Based on 89 reported grades
A: 32
B: 18
A-: 13
B-: 7
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (15)
Get ready to read (14)
TEST HEAVY (14)
Respected (11)
LECTURE HEAVY (9)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (9)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (9)
Test heavy (9)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.57 avg change
Apr
May
Dec
Apr
Jul
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

NUTRISCI123

5.0

(2)

NUTRITIONALSCI

5.0

(1)

NUTRITION134

5.0

(1)

NUT1987

5.0

(1)

NTRSC001

5.0

(1)
+34 more courses
Difficulty by Course

NUTRI124

5.0

PEACT100

4.5

KINES100

4.5

PE100

4.0

NUTRISCI332

4.0

Reviews (299)
4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Mar 29, 2005

easy class. take it. prof petey can be boring at times but hes a good guy over all. just take good notes. and youll be fine. or never go to class and get them offline. :)

5.0
2.0
NUTRISCI
Apr 15, 2005

I love Pete! He really knows what he's talking about. He sometimes tells interesting stories about his 'patients' which allow you to remember important concepts more easily. He stutters sometimes, but I think it's cute. TIP: Study old exams for ALL exams! (and Shane the TA is pretty worthless)

4.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Apr 18, 2005

This class was surprisingly interesting. Go to lecture, do the study questions, and be sure to do the old exams and you'll do fine. Don't buy the book--you never, ever use it.

2.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Apr 21, 2005

Very nit-picky details on the test rather than general concepts. Boring to listen to. Tries to trick you on exams. Not really my idea of an exciting class. For those of you told Nutri Sci is easy, don't be fooled.

5.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Apr 22, 2005

Very funny guy with nice personality. You can't beat a 3 credit science class with no lab. Tests are very easy if you take the online practice quizzes beforehand. Should be at least a guranteed B.

5.0
3.0
NUTRISCI
May 9, 2005

Awesome guy, interesting material. Take advantage of practice tests online.

3.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
May 9, 2005

in the online section, mak sure you keep up with the lectures. take advantage of the practice exams. Questions on exams are very tricky sometimes. this class was not as easy as i had hoped it would be.

2.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
May 12, 2005

This class is a lot harder than people said, or than this website said. Unless you are willing to make this "your most important class", and "write out your own essays on the material" (direct quotes from anderson) then I would stear clear.

4.0
1.0
NS132
May 15, 2005

This class was so easy, don't believe the postings complaining of the difficulty (they probably sport a 2.0 GPA). Just go to lecture and do the practice exams, and you'll do fine.

5.0
1.0
NUTRISCI123
Aug 2, 2005

SOOOOOOO EASY! I didn't even buy the book and I got an A. Lecture is boring, but if you take notes and use the practice exams/review sheets you'll be fine. Half of the questions on exams are from old exams anyway.

5.0
1.0
NUTRITIONALSCI
Oct 26, 2005

I love him! He explains everything really well and I find the lectures very interesting, if you pay attention an A is gauranteed

5.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Oct 1, 2005

No Comments

4.0
2.0
APCOMPSCI
Nov 1, 2005

No Comments

4.0
2.0
PEACTIV100
Nov 15, 2005

hard to read handwriting, but at least he writes the important things down instead of just lecturing at you. seems rushed at times which makes handwriting even worse. good guy though

5.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Nov 18, 2005

This is a very easy bio credit. PRINT OFF THE LECTURE NOTES FROM ON-LINE. I swear it will make your life and the exams a million times easier. Do the practice exams cuz the test is usually 50% of those questions. Good class if you are actually interested in nutrition.

5.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
Nov 28, 2005

No Comments

5.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 1, 2005

great lecturer, he sometimes stutters but it is cute

5.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 1, 2005

Do the practice exams/quizzes and study the old exams and you'll be fine for the tests. Really easy if you can memorize. Material is really easy and easy to understand.

4.0
2.0
NUTRSCI132
Dec 12, 2005

Takes exam questions straight from online practice exams. Only 10% of exam questions are new.

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 20, 2005

Fairly easy class with interesting material. Some questions on the exams are worded a bit tricky. Lots of memorization. If you have a good memory and go to lecture, you should be fine.

2.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 21, 2005

studders

4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 22, 2005

he was probably my favorite professor so far, but the class is definitely not easy. all the tests include random questions that were never taught in class/found in the book. interesting at times, but don't expect to have an automatic A at all.

3.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 31, 2005

He puts random questions on exams, and makes the subject matter harder then it needs to be. If you actually want to learn nutrition, dont take this class, because it hardly covers food guides etc.

4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI230
Jan 7, 2006

Dear God this class is boring. Honestly my least favorite class I have ever taken. If you're not actually interested in nutrition, I would not recommend it. But if you do end up taking it... take the practice tests online and memorize the answers. A good portion of the exam comes straight from there.

3.0
2.0
NUTRISCI
Jan 16, 2006

This is a pretty good class, except for there is really no point in going to lecture if you are just copying down what he writes on the board and don't listen to what he's talking about. Trust me, your notes will seem very incomplete if this is what you do! Def. recommend doing the practice exams online!

5.0
2.0
NUTRISCI
Jan 19, 2006

This class got me more interested in nutrition with the material, but I was upset because he can be damn tricky on the exams. The practice exams help a LOT. He has a really dry sense of humor, I don't think many got it or were awake for it. Really helpful in his office hours.

4.0
2.0
NUTRITIONTODAY
Feb 20, 2006

If you take the practice exams online, the actual exams are easier. You still have to know your stuff, but you will be able to whiz through parts of it.

2.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Apr 30, 2006

Can't stand going to this class, Pete just throws information at you like no other professor has before.There are so many random questions on the exams on material he's never taught, but expects us to know. Definitely thought this class would be about something else, and am recommending that people do not take this class.

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
May 9, 2006

Exams are not bad at all if you look over your lecture notes and go over the practice exams and past exams.

4.0
3.0
NUTRITION132
May 9, 2006

This class is alright as long as you read the book, the lectures are exactly out of the book. Do the practice exams because they are very similar to the exams and looking over older exams helps also. Overall good teacher, but very very boring!!

3.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Jul 14, 2006

If you can put up with his awkward fidgiting... ie. him putting one leg up on the table during lecture... you'll be fine. Use practice exams for studying.

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Jul 17, 2006

I loved the class; mostly because the subject is useful. The book and his lectures are word for word the same, but the lectures aren't all that bad, just be prepared to write a bit without many notes from him. He's funny in his own way, I definitely enjoyed his sense of humor. Tests are tricky for some odd reason - do the practice tests. Yeah Pete!

5.0
2.0
NUTRITION134
Jul 20, 2006

Great teacher and topic. I really enjoyed the class and would take another course with him if possible. STUDY ALL OF THE PRACTICE TESTS ONLINE. Very helpful materials. Do not bother buying the book. The tests are solely based on lecture.

3.0
3.0
NUTRSCI132
Jul 25, 2006

This class has the potential for being very easy, unfortunately, you still have to do some work: GO TO CLASS! That's about it. Don't bother buying the book, lectures are just him outlining what you read. Tests come straight from lecture and he has old exams posted online. Study from those tests, because most of the questions come from those.

5.0
3.0
NUTRITION132
Aug 2, 2006

No Comments

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCTI132
Aug 9, 2006

Very organized lectures. Will review the previous day's lecture in a nutshell the next lecture period, which helps if you miss one. Don't buy the textbook as he says everything that it says. He is a funny guy.

3.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Sep 4, 2006

His handwriting is horrible and super small, so i would suggest sitting near the front. other than that, i really enjoy nutrition so this class was extremely fun for me. do the past exams on line. their are so many of the same questions.

5.0
2.0
NUTSC132
Sep 24, 2006

Very knowledgeable. Good class overall, though the book and lecture were nearly identical. Still, the lectures were always worthwhile as he boiled everything down to the key points. Highly recommend this class

5.0
1.0
NUT1987
Oct 16, 2006

good guy

3.0
2.0
NUTRS132
Nov 14, 2006

If you want a good grade in this class you must attend lecture, take really good notes, and it is imperative that you read the text book. And then after you have done all of those things--you should then study the practice tests online and memorize all of those. You must do all of these things if you want an A.

3.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Nov 20, 2006

Good class, I learned a lot! The tests are sort of hard but not too bad! As far as the professor goes, his handwriting is bad and small so sit near the front. Other than that though, he is a pretty good professor!

2.0
4.0
NSCI132
Nov 28, 2006

do not take this class online. he talks way too fast for you to understand, mumbles some of the time, and his voice is annoying to listen to. tests are hard and confusing and since he wrote the textbook you are using, i advise you to steer clear of that class.

4.0
2.0
NS132
Dec 18, 2006

He is one of the better lecturers I've seen at Madison. His handwriting needs improvement, especially when students are trying to write words they are hearing for the first time in their notes, but he tells you everything you need to know for the exams. Great class if you have any interest in your own health.

4.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Dec 22, 2006

Tests can be very tricky, awesome guy

3.0
4.0
NUTRI132
Dec 31, 2006

boring lecture, nice guy though. tests were vague, but thats the only work there is to do. no matter how hard i studied, i couldnt get over a c on the tests. ended with a bc.

5.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Jan 2, 2007

Pete is chill! He helped write the text book, which has a lot of typos, but the advantage is that his notes are WORD FOR WORD what is in the text, so if you miss class just do the reading. His notes were clear, and mostly to the point. His exams are all multiple choice, and everything on the exams is covered at some point. Use online tools!!!!!!!

1.0
5.0
NUTRI124
Jan 13, 2007

No Comments

4.0
1.0
NUTRI132
Jan 14, 2007

I liked the class and the content. The tests were rather easy, but tricky at the same time. I recommend this class if you want to learn more about nutrition. It's kind of easy, but at the same time, if you don't put some effort into the class, you will find it more challenging.

5.0
2.0
NS132
Feb 5, 2007

stutters a little, but overall really clear expectations. book not very useful cuz it covers the same stuff as lecture. study guides and previous midterms put on learn@uw were very helpful...lots of same questions on the tests.

2.0
4.0
NUTRI132
Apr 15, 2007

People said NutriSci was an easy Class if you are not a science person. i found out the hard way that most the people that do well are people who are good at science. There are definitely some scientific facts that knowing them will help you on the exam. He always uses q's from past exams, but even that doesnt always help.

4.0
1.0
NS132
May 15, 2007

Since he co-wrote the book, many lectures are word-for-word from the the text. Tests are all multiple choice, get to drop 1 of 3 midterms, optional discussion. Definitely not hard to get a good grade if you put some effort in and actually care at all about nutrition. He does move at kind of a fast pace though.

4.0
3.0
NS132
May 21, 2007

Coming from a guy who pretty much sucks at and hates anything science related, I actually really like this class. I think it actually teaches you a lot, and even though an A is not the easiest thing to get, it's worth it to take it. Definitely one of my favorite and most useful classes I've taken. Not a lot of work either. I'd recommend it.

4.0
2.0
NUTSC132
May 24, 2007

Pete's a good professor. He knows his stuff and cares about his students. The tests really are that hard especially if u understand the material and do the past exams. U DON'T have to be a "science person" just willing to work a little. No cake walk, but still a fun and easy science class, especially if u like the topic.

4.0
2.0
NUTSC132
May 24, 2007

Tests are NOT that hard. Sorry.

4.0
1.0
NS132
May 27, 2007

easy if you go to lectures and memorize old exams

5.0
1.0
NS132
May 29, 2007

The book is useless UNTIL the post-third midterm topics. I lost many points on the final because it was half of the final but he only explained it in two weeks. Read the book for those sections, but otherwise just keep up in lecture -- which is EXTREMELY boring though! It's an easy class and really useful and fun.

4.0
2.0
NUSCI132
Jun 8, 2007

Test questions are very tricky, very specific. Otherwise, a fun class, good professor

4.0
2.0
NTSCI132
Aug 23, 2007

Should be an easy class. Just go to lecture even though its hard to stay awake. READ THROUGH PREVIOUS EXAMS ON LEARN@UW!! there are TONS of questions on the current exams from there.

4.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Sep 12, 2007

Mr. Anderson is a very nice man, the class isn't that hard to understand and he teaches right from the book so reading is only necessary for studying material....he kinda talks like christopher walken, and goes thorough material at a fast pace, the only compliant i have about him is a superfical one...he sweats ALOT

4.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Oct 30, 2007

Pete is the kind of guy that although I've never spoken to, I feel like he's my uncle. Lecture consists mostly of 50 minutes of writing down exactly what he puts on the chalkboard, but then come exam time and if you've gone to every class, you should get an A on the test. The textbook is a waste of money, since he wrote it and lectures out of it.

4.0
3.0
NS132
Nov 17, 2007

The class is supposed to be really easy, but I found the exams to be incredibly random at times. You feel like you did well, but you end up not.

5.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Dec 3, 2007

This is actually a really interesting class. I wanted a pretty easy science class to fill requirements, and this is a great one. If you just study the material a day or two before the tests, you are totally fine, and he reuses lots of questions from old tests. He wrote the textbook, so if you miss lecture, its not that big of a deal.

5.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Dec 6, 2007

Interesting to listen to. Although his tests always seem to have a few questions on material I've never seen.

5.0
1.0
NUTRI132
Dec 9, 2007

very easy course with pretty interesting and useful material. teaches straight out of textbook, so either don't go to class or don't buy the book. do practice exams...half of the questions are exactly the same!

4.0
4.0
PEACT100
Dec 23, 2007

Really knows what he's talking about. But he talks SUPER FAST. I'd recommend bringing a computer to class when he lectures. Gives a lot of extra information, but as long as you get the general idea of the concepts you'll do fine. GO TO LECTURE when he's speaking, he presents a ton of info and it's hard to make up

5.0
1.0
NSCI132
Dec 23, 2007

An amazing professor, totally passionate about what he is teaching and very clear about it. The tests are almost so easy it hurts. Read the book once (or attend lecture, don't do both) and you will get at LEAST a B on them. Do both, and you will have an A no question. I wish I would have made it to more lectures because he is so great to listen to.

5.0
1.0
NUTR132
Dec 24, 2007

Lectures straight from textbook, lecture is basically unimportatn

4.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Dec 24, 2007

I took this class online and as long as you are motivated enough to not fall behind, it's interesting and easy enough! He teaches right out of the book, so that makes it easier! Make sure to do all the practice exams, and MEMORIZE them... most of the questions are straight off of them. The final is kind of hard though! Overall, a good class.

3.0
4.0
NUTRI132
Dec 28, 2007

Pretty easy course if you stay ahead of the readings. I took the online section and didn't fall behind too much. Memorize the previous exams and practice exams and you're golden.

4.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 28, 2007

People who think this class is hard are out of their mind. If you have half a brain and can figure out that most mid-term questions are from old tests, the exams are cake. I dropped the first test and got 98s on the following two. The final is more challenging because there are no practice questions and the pregnancy material is very detailed.

4.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Jan 15, 2008

DO THE PRACTICE TESTS - ALL OF THEM! if you do you'll find 50% of the questions on the midterms (if not more) are the exact same. (the final is a diff story - only maybe a few are the same on that)

5.0
2.0
NUTR132
Jan 18, 2008

His Lectures were alright. He knows what he's talking about thats for sure. Practace tests online saved me every time - do them all (even the old ones). His outlines are helpful too to study from

4.0
4.0
NUTRI132
Jan 30, 2008

EXTREMELY boring lectures. I didn't pick up the book until before the final and it helped a little. Tests cover ABSOLUTELY NOTHING from lectures. Study previous tests he makes available online- it's the only way to pass! 4 tests, no reading, no discussion.

5.0
1.0
NS132
Jan 30, 2008

Pete is the man! Honestly, this class is a breeze. Anyone who gives Pete a bad rating shouldn't be at Madison. Listen to his study tips..they work!! Also, do the online exams..a lot of the questions will be on your exam. I recommend reading the book before going to lecture. Not necessary but helps you pay more attention. Take this class!!

3.0
1.0
NUTRI132
Apr 28, 2008

Talks so fast that he jumbles his words around, very non linear style of speach, hard to understand. But if you manage to take notes, read the book, and study the online materials, you can succeed easily. He definitely cares about his students and helps them out a lot.

3.0
2.0
NS132
May 18, 2008

Easy class overall. Discussion not mandatory. Midterms are easy since about half or more of the questions are from old tests that are available online. Final was more difficult. Book isn't necessary since his notes are what the book says. Handwriting is sometimes illegible and his form of outlining sucks.

3.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 4, 2008

Okay NutriSci is a class that is told is going to be an easy biology credit. Its interesting what you learn, but its definitely not an easy A. Lecture is pointless, just read the book, he literally goes WORD FOR WORD from the book. Exams are so unclear, just study old exams. The grade spread is HORRIBLE

4.0
2.0
NS132
Dec 10, 2008

The lectures are very clear, and he wrote the textbook so it basically just repeats what he says in class (which can be helpful if you miss lecture or if you need extra review on something). Most people don't go to the optional discussion. The online practice tests help A LOT. Pete is a cool guy, too- he's teaching 1000 kids but keeps it fun.

3.0
2.0
NS132
Dec 27, 2008

Very nice guy. Pretty easy class with minimul work outside of class. I didn't read the textbook and I went to almost all classes and received an A. The exams are multiple choice and pretty easy. The only bad thing was his handwriting and his outlining style isn't clear.

4.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Dec 28, 2008

Not hard to do well in this class as long as you study sufficiently. He doesn't try to trick you in exams and because he wrote the book, you don't necessarily need to go to class. Overall, a good class.

4.0
4.0
NUTSC132
Jan 4, 2009

Lectures were interesting and informative. They were quick paced but easy to follow. Exams were difficult. Must know the information to do well, not a coaster class.

4.0
3.0
NSCI132
Feb 18, 2009

This class is definately not the "easy A" that people claim but it won't rip you apart either. Study. Read the book. take the practice exams!!! The book and lecture are pretty much the same so lecture attendance is really not all that important. The tests aren't difficult but you always end up getting more wrong than you think you did.

4.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Mar 25, 2009

The material is fairly easy and he's willing to help students as much as possible.

3.0
4.0
NS132
Apr 19, 2009

read the book

1.0
1.0
NUTRA132
Apr 20, 2009

Terrible professor! He is full of himself and he is always yelling at the class for something minor. The first exam is identical to the practice ones. The other three exams are not, so make sure you study for them. The final is cummulative which sucks. Not an easy A!!

3.0
4.0
NS132
May 11, 2009

This class is definitely not the easy A everyone says it is. While you don't have to go to lecture, you DO have to read the book carefully. Tests are tricky and his grading scheme is pretty convoluted. The final was tough.

2.0
3.0
NS132
May 12, 2009

two options: attend lecture 3 times a week, or read the book carefully (exact same as class). Do the practice tests and the midterms are easy. Final was surprisingly difficult and all new questions. With a decent amount of effort an A is achievable. I haven't been to class in two months, and I still might pull off an A...

3.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Jun 2, 2009

BUT THIS CLASS IS NOT AN EASY A...BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION. He curves it so only like 10 percent (maybe 15) get A's. and you have to go to every lecture unfortunately, he will test on every single note. First test is a joke but they get harder each time and the final test is actually quite hard.

5.0
1.0
NUTRI132
Jun 16, 2009

easy A. Awesomeness class. Very helpful and interesting. Take the online course.

4.0
1.0
NS132
Oct 26, 2009

The class is easy if you go to lectures and read the book. He wrote the book so lectures are pretty similar to the readings, but sometimes he throws in information that isn't in the book so I would go to class.

4.0
1.0
NUTRI132
Nov 20, 2009

You don't need the book if you go to lecture. They are literally the same word for word.

3.0
1.0
NUTRI132
Dec 15, 2009

Boring lecturer and hard to read hand writing. He wrote the book and teaches right out of it. Take the practice quizzes and you'll guaranteed at least a B on the tests.

3.0
4.0
NUTRI132
Dec 18, 2009

Do NOT take this course if you are NOT a science person. Do NOT be fooled. This is an OVERLOAD of information and the questions asked on exams are tricky and useless. The book can be somewhat helpful to clarify topics-but mainly just need to go to lecture. I hate nutri sci & legumes, because of this class haha

3.0
2.0
NS132
Dec 18, 2009

This class is basically just memorization, material is easy but you still have to know it well. I would recommend not buying the book (ridiculously expensive) and just go to lecture because all the questions on the exams are straight from the notes. You get to drop 1 midterm so try to do well on the 1st two cause the 3rd is hard.

4.0
4.0
NS132
Dec 18, 2009

This class is not easy, not hard but frustrating. Anderson's handwriting on the board is not legible. The text book is actually a joke. He wrote it himself. it is repetitive and has so many typos...all in all just horribly written.

5.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 19, 2009

Definitely not an easy A. The class only has 3 midterms, one you can drop, and a final. He will question you on anything, and everything. Questions are tricky and oddly worded, so they can be confusing. Know your stuff. He is definitely very passionate and knowledgable on the subject. He makes it interesting.

3.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Dec 22, 2009

Took the online version, very easy. Make sure to study the old exams on the website and take the pracice exams on Learn@UW. Final is hard, study a lot for it.

4.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 28, 2009

This class is an easy BC and by no means an easy A. Averages for each of the 3 exams were in the 70's-80's and the curve is hardly helpful. Textbook is riddled with irritating typos for such an expensive book. Do the reading and you'll be fine with a B. Go to lecture and do the reading and you should do better. NOT AN EASY A, lots of studying!

3.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Jan 11, 2010

Nutri sci was a lot of work and I only pulled off a BC which is quite irritating. Didn't use the textbook once, it was a big waste of 140 dollars. It was also poorly written. Study old exams because about 1/2 of midterm questions come from past exams.

4.0
4.0
NS132
Apr 9, 2010

I barely ever went to lecture b/c the professor wrote the textbook..definitely not an easy class, especially if you only want science credit. A LOT of memorization about little details & tests are not easy but i pulled off a B when i realized how much i had to study. definitely look over the old tests he uses many similar questions on the new exams

4.0
3.0
NS132
Sep 2, 2010

The way he presented the material was pretty straight forward, but the exams were pretty difficult. NOT AN EASY A.

5.0
1.0
NS132
Nov 15, 2010

Very easy science class! Exam questions are 90% from the past exams that he posts on learn@uw, so just memorize those and you're golden. Pete is very knowledgeable! Lectures follow the book to a T. He wrote it...

4.0
1.0
NSC132
Nov 21, 2010

DON'T BUY THE BOOK! If you go to lecture you will never need it. The class(Nutri Sci) is easy.

5.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Dec 17, 2010

If you go to class regularly, you will find that you won't be needing the book that much until Finals come. He's funny at times and taught at a good pace and gives some good tips for studying for the course. Hand writing is a little messy, and he does repeat information from tiem to time. Tests are an easy B but a hard A

5.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Dec 17, 2010

Study the practice Exmas at the Learn @UW because a huge chunk of the questions on his test come from there. Really straight-forward material to learn, but the tests are not as easy as you'd expect them to be.

4.0
4.0
NUTRI132
Jan 6, 2011

The exams will catch you off guard and he rushes through lecture. I often felt lecture to be pointless and very unorganized.Dont go in thinking that this class is easy because you will end up very behind and the exams will bite you in the butt.

3.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Jan 8, 2011

This class is ridiculous. Take it! I only went to class for a month and got a B. He writes the textbook, so if you read it and look at past tests he puts online, you will do just fine! He reuses 80% of the questions that are online so study them!

5.0
1.0
NS132
Jan 12, 2011

online section is easy! everything he says is exactly the same in the book so either read or listen to the lectures. also, the midterms have about 60% of the questions word for word on the midterm so study those! the final is a little tough but doable.

2.0
3.0
NUTRI135
Jan 17, 2011

Extremely boring teacher.

4.0
2.0
NS132
May 5, 2011

Pete has been my best college prof so far. He is clear, enthusiastic, and loves teaching. Exams are 60% old questions which he gives you to practice. Don't bother buying the textbook if you plan on going to lecture everyday-he wrote the book so the stuff is the same. Overall easy Bio Sci class with minimal work.

3.0
3.0
NUTSC132
May 10, 2011

I took the online section of Nutri Sci 132. If you listen to the lecture podcasts that he posts in the content section and do the readings you will do fine. A couple words of advice: don't let yourself get behind because it is online and Pete stutters and is super hard to listen to because he repeats himself.

3.0
1.0
NUTSC132
May 11, 2011

This class is a filler.Its an easy B, and you have to work to get an A.He wrote the textbook and goes over the same stuff in lecture,so if you do one of them you'll get a C, both will be a higher grade.The textbook is AWFUL when it comes to spelling, structure, etc.(at one point he goes from chapter 14 to chapter 16).Take If you need a GPA booster.

2.0
5.0
NS132
May 11, 2011

Pete will put you to sleep every day. Tests are not easy, he will test you on content that you never learned, and you will have to study and do all of the readings to get a B. Would not recommend to my worst enemy.

2.0
4.0
NS132
May 11, 2011

The tests in this class were ridiculous. he asked questions on things that he may have mentioned once in passing and most of the questions were super specific, tests were aweful. the first few were just recylced questions from past tests. you can either read the text book or go to lecture, both is unnecessary. only good thing was no homework ever.

5.0
1.0
NUT132
May 16, 2011

He is a very clear lecturer and the subject matter is interesting. The book is terribly written and I would say optional. I don't see why everyone says the class is hard- all you need to do is do the practice exams. So many of the questions are reused. Overall, I enjoyed the class and found it to be very applicable do my and others lives.

3.0
4.0
NUTRI132
May 20, 2011

Went into this class thinking it would be interesting and pretty straightforward. WRONG--boring lecture, even when I studied the material the tests would ask about ridiculous details. The lecture is essentially the book, I would recommend just reading and taking good notes. Not an easy A, even with all the work I put in I still only got a B.

5.0
3.0
NS132
May 28, 2011

132 is probably more difficult than it should be. Pete's a decent lecturer. If you read the book and use the practice exams, you should get a decent grade. The fact that the book is the same as the lecture is a little irritating, but use it as an opportunity to review.

1.0
4.0
NS132
Jul 25, 2011

If you're looking for an interesting, easy science class - look elsewhere, because this is neither. Pete will put you to sleep. He repeats the same stories over and over, but then will test you on something he's never talked about or very briefly mentioned. You don't need his awful book if you go to class. I wish I would've taken something else.

3.0
3.0
NUTSC132
Aug 6, 2011

Pete was hard to understand at times and the class material was dull and uninteresting. The textbook was a copy of the lecture and as long as you go to lecture, you don't even need the textbook. Tests are WAY harder than the lecture material and he asks questions that were never covered. If you're looking for a fun easy class, keep looking.

5.0
1.0
NS132
Nov 27, 2011

I liked Pete Anderson. He's genuinely passionate about nutrition, and his exams are very similar to the practice tests he provides. The book is poorly written, and with lots of typos, but it's not difficult to understand. It is an easy A if you attend class and do the practice tests.

2.0
4.0
NS132
Nov 29, 2011

His lectures completely lack structure, and the textbook (which he wrote) is unhelpful, full of typos, and expensive. The exams are all multiple choice, but extremely difficult. He chooses to focus on specific, little details. The exams often included questions from chapters we had not covered yet. Overall, this class was extremely frustrating.

2.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 6, 2011

Worst teacher ever!!! He doesn't know how to write! Very hard to see what he writes on the blackboard. Have to buy a newbook because he not only added chapters and also changed the materials within chapters, if you compare the old ones to the new ones, which can really harm you on the exams! And the lectures are really boring! The curve is bad!

2.0
5.0
PEACT100
Dec 7, 2011

The reason I received a poor grade in the Nutrition course he teaches with two other professors. His writing incomprehensible on the blackboard, and he teaches at a graduate student rate in a 2 credit course. He not only doesn't review information, he gives no indication of what in his flow of info is important for tests. Absolutely infuriating.

4.0
1.0
NS132
Dec 7, 2011

YOU DO NOT NEED TO BUY THE TEXTBOOK NEW. Pete Anderson puts in purposeful typos so that he can realease a new edition every year and make more money. I REPEAT BUY A USED TEXTBOOK FOR $100 CHEAPER. Having said that, if you go to class and use the review sheets/past exams on you will get A's on the exams.

1.0
4.0
NUTR132
Dec 7, 2011

DONT BUY THE BOOK. Its a bunch of rubbish and a waste of money, I never use it and I've gotten As on my exams and I spent $165 on it. Pete is a terrible lecturer. Jumps around alot, no clear cut path, makes a ton of spelling mistakes, hard to understand, class in boring as hell. I WOULD NOT reccommend this class to anybody.

4.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Dec 28, 2011

Pete is a very passionate lecturer who makes the material interesting to learn about. The most helpful piece of advice I can give for his class is to do all of the practice exams in preparation for his exams, which are very manageable if this is done.

2.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Dec 29, 2011

This dude needs to get his stuff together... lecture notes (and book notes, because he literally lectures straight from the book HE wrote) are all over the place, horribly organized, and just flat out boring to read/listen to. Either buy the book and dont go to class, or save your money ($160) and just go to lecture.. each has the same material

3.0
3.0
NSCI132
Dec 30, 2011

Really easy to get a B or AB, but there are always around 5-6 questions on his tests never mentioned anywhere, so you need to guess your way to an A. A nice guy overall, but sometimes hard to follow. STUDY OLD EXAMS, 60% of questions are reused. The final is a different story.

4.0
1.0
NTRSC132
Jan 20, 2012

So easy to do well in this class. Buying the book is pointless because he basically recites it in his lecture.

3.0
2.0
NTRSC132
Feb 21, 2012

Class is fairly easy. Really study the old exams because majority of the questions are from there in some form or the other (many times exact same questions). The final is different though, do not go into depth on old material for final because the questions are a breeze, concentrate on the newer material.

4.0
3.0
NURTI132
Apr 10, 2012

Pete is a great professor. 3 midterms and a final, but the final is only half cumlative, and you get to drop your lowest midterm grade. He talks fast during lecture,so be quick with note taking. He writes the textbook himself and basically recites it in class.you can tell he really cares about the subject.really great guy if you get to know him.

5.0
2.0
NTRSC001
Apr 12, 2012

Midterms are fairly easy. Study old exams, because many of the questions are word for word the same. Really make sure you understand the whole concept of things for the final. The lecture is basically just a re-explanation of the book. I found it was good to read and attend lecture for double exposure.

4.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Apr 16, 2012

Pete was kinda boring. He has a lot of questions on his midterms that came directly from old exams that you can study. I studied for tests the night before and never read the textbook and managed a B. It should've been an easy A if I put in a little more effort. Super easy material and class.

5.0
2.0
NUTRI132
May 11, 2012

Pete was kinda boring. Most people do not go to lectures, or listen when they are there, however, he loves what he teaches. Tests have questions directly from practices tests so do them. Lots of useful material and very useful for your life. Great class.

3.0
3.0
NS101
May 12, 2012

Professor writes notes very fast. Since he writes the book, lecture is exactly the same and he repeats himself all the time. Some of the test questions are ridiculous, not as easy of class that everyone says it is.

4.0
2.0
NUTR132
May 14, 2012

If you take this class my recommendations would be 1. don't buy the book and attend every lecture. you will save money because they are exactly the same. 2. do the practice exams online because many of the questions are repeated. If you put moderate effort into this class you will get at least a B.

5.0
1.0
NS132
May 14, 2012

Pete recycles old exam questions, so you can study off of old exams. All multiple choice. He wrote the book, so attending the lecture is exactly the same as reading the book. VERY easy class.

5.0
2.0
NUTRI132
May 22, 2012

Pretty boring. Super easy to get a B. Fairly challenging to get an A but is definitely possible. I wouldnt take this first semester freshman year

3.0
4.0
NS132
May 25, 2012

Pete is a fair professor at best. Use the online practice exams and you should be fine. The final is rough and presents material nobody could study enough of to understand.

3.0
2.0
NS132
May 25, 2012

Lectures are very dry but easy to follow along. Pete is pretty boring but also knowledgeable about the subject. Textbook is exactly the same as lecture, don't buy it. Three midterms (drop lowest) and half-cumulative exam. Study old exams and read discussion notes. Pretty easy, but not too exciting.

5.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Aug 7, 2012

Enthusiasm was infectious.

2.0
2.0
NS132
Nov 28, 2012

Easy material, unhelpful professor. Requires you to buy his online book & quizzes (even though I had already purchased the actual book & needed just the online homework code). Adios $100. Lectures are BORING, UNORGANIZED, & you will develop carpal tunnel from copying all of his chicken scratch notes. He used less repeat questions on exams this year

5.0
2.0
NUSCI132
Dec 10, 2012

I personally loved this class! I am a first semester Freshman, and this was my favorite course. Lectures were very helpful, and his notes were very well laid out. Discussion was optional, I never went. Midterms were simple and fair. I never had to open the book, so it was unfortunate that I had to buy it for the online homework.

3.0
2.0
NUSCI132
Dec 16, 2012

Lectures will put you to sleep, don't bother going. He wrote the textbook so the lectures are pretty much word for word from it. Three midterm multiple choice exams, you can drop one, read the book and take practice exams and you'll be fine. The book is a rip off, full of typos and poorly written but you need it if you don't want to go to lecture.

3.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 18, 2012

This class was really boring. A lot of the information is nit-picky little details. Had to buy the textbook to do the ridiculous amounts of pointless online homework even though reading the textbook wasn't necessary. Pete is boring and the class was just overall annoying. Exams were challenging.

3.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Dec 19, 2012

I took nutrisci online, so instead of listening to his boring lectures in person i listened to them online/read the chapter. You can either go to class/listen to lectures OR read the book because it's the same thing. The tests are easy, only if you look at past exams, so i recommend getting old tests from someone! Overall it was an easy class.

2.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 28, 2012

Pete ran a lecture that was word-for-word from the textbook that he wrote. You must by the expensive text in order to do the homework, so lecture isn't necessary if you just read his book. Past exams are provided, which is where a majority of his exam material comes from. Memorize the past exams and you should do fine.

4.0
2.0
NUTRI132
Jan 4, 2013

Man, this class could be so interesting if it wasn't structured like every other college course out there. The material is very useful for life, but the way Pete lectured on it was boring, and his textbook was awful and unnecessary outside of the code for online homeworks (which were stupid and didn't really help at all). You should be okay here.

3.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Apr 14, 2013

Prof. knows his stuff and lecture is based off of textbook. Material is interesting, but lecture can be boring. Exams were okay, but some questions were about stuff never mentioned in lecture which was annoying.

4.0
2.0
NURT132
Apr 24, 2013

Easy class but the textbook and the online homework aren't very useful at all. The homework ends up being a tedious chore, but you have to do it if you want your "free" 5%. Take the class online. Overall the class was interesting.

3.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
May 12, 2013

I'm 100% convinced Pete purposely puts errors in his text so that he can keep making new additions and make you buy the online version. Seriously, there is a word in the book in that contains the number 1 in the middle of it. Despite that, this class was easy. I only ever read the book. Definitely take it if you need the credit.

2.0
2.0
NUTRSCI132
May 13, 2013

I stopped going to this class halfway through semester entirely, and still managed an AB. I thought it would be quite interesting given the relevancy of the topic, and yet Pete is just awful in his lectures. He uses outlines and a chalkboard, and half my notes didn't make sense when I looked at them to study. Also, the book is bad and overpriced.

1.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
May 17, 2013

Very boring lecturer. Stopped going to class midway through the semester and am ending up with about a C. This semester he started to switch up the tests, rather than re-using the old ones, which screwed me. Boring class, tests and kind of hard, and bad professor. He makes you buy the book and its terrible.

4.0
2.0
NUTRSCI132
May 24, 2013

Lectures could be boring, but he is a genuinely nice guy who cares about his students. I never looked at the book once, but had to purchase it to access the online homework. The homework was kind of pointless, but easy to do. The exams are all multiple choice. If you do the practice exams and memorize a lot of the questions, you should do well.

2.0
4.0
PE100
May 31, 2013

Teaches by just writing on the board with his back turned to the class the whole time. Moves pretty quickly so if you lose concentration for a second you'll be lost. Grade based on three tests alone, so you must take them seriously.

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI231
Jun 8, 2013

Great guy and really helpful at office hours. Really boring and uninteresting class for me though even I can imagine people find it interesting. Keep up reading the books and go over notes and you will get a good grade for sure.

1.0
1.0
NUTSCI132
Jul 26, 2013

Might as well take the class in person than online. Online lectures can be up to 2.5 hrs. Unless you cant fit the class into your schedule you might as well go. The book's of no use. If you don't mind missing out on 5% of your grade I wouldn't even buy it. If taken online don't bother reading AND listening to lectures. U can get an A focusing on 1

4.0
2.0
NUTRSCI132
Oct 23, 2013

I'm surprised other people are rating him so low! I was not a science person at all but took this class for the biological credits. Easy. Easy exams, easy online homework. Lectures word for word from the book so either go to class or read the textbook. Quite an interesting class.

3.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Nov 5, 2013

While this class is definitely an easy A because he recycles every single question on his tests, I am only commenting to say what an embarrassment his textbook is. TERRIBLY organized, typos everywhere, charts with zero labels etc. A JOKE.

3.0
1.0
NS132
Nov 20, 2013

Test questions are recycled and homework is based on participation. The book and lecture are the same, and of course the >$100 online book (written by himself) is mandatory. Homework can be unrelated to lecture/book, but it's based on completion, not accuracy. Very easy Bio Sci course.

3.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Nov 22, 2013

Pete's a good guy. Exams use the same questions as previous ones which he gives you so memorize the answers and you'll do fine. Lowest midterm out of 3 gets dropped. Tries to pack too much information in at one time which can be a little much.

5.0
1.0
NUTRSCI132
Nov 24, 2013

This is a very easy class to take. He wrote the textbook required so lecture and reading are pretty much the same. Homework is online and extremely easy He gives 3 exams and a cumulative final. Most test questions are posted online. Good teacher to take!

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: C
Nov 26, 2013

The class is easy if you either read the textbook or go to lecture. His lectures are kind of dry, and I get the impression that he has taught the class so many times that he doesn't remember if he teaches certain concepts. Homework is worth 5% and is based on completion--it takes a lot of time. Easiest bio course that you could get at Madison.

5.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 13, 2013

Pete is THE MAN. Take this class. It's easy, he's a super cool guy, and you'll actually learn a lot about nutrition. Recommended.

1.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B
Dec 17, 2013

Pete wrote the textbook so if the lecture is unclear the book won't help at all. He doesn't know anything when asked a question during lecture and he couldn't make the info any more boring. The class wasn't terribly difficult but tests were full of little details. Food is not love.

1.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
Dec 17, 2013

Pete was a very dry lecturer and a lot of the things he talked about in lecture were confusing. The worst part is that you can't turn to the textbook for assistance either because he wrote it. (The book is full of typos and conflicting information too.) He was awful at answering questions in lecture. Also, his love of legumes is kind of ridiculous.

4.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 19, 2013

I loved this class! It was straightforward and you were given all the materials you needed to succeed. He wrote the book so basically either you go to class or you read and you'll be fine. There are online homework assignments, which are a bit annoying, for every chapter and 3 midterms (lowest dropped). Overall, worth my while and I'd recommend

3.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 19, 2013

Its only easy if you put in the effort to study. Practice exams help but to get an A you must go to the TA lead review session. My advice: Do really well on two of the three midterms so that when you fail the final it won't hit you too hard.

3.0
1.0
NS132
Dec 22, 2013

Very easy class, do the practice /old exams many times and you'll be fine. Textbook and lectures are the exact same. Homework was ridiculous though, it varied between 75-140 questions and each assignment was less than .5% of your grade though it's based on completion.

4.0
2.0
NS132
Dec 19, 2013

The material is very straight forward. Nothing but memorizing. Still there is a curb and because the material is easy, the curb can be pretty rough. Get a few questions wrong on a midterm and your grade drops quite a bit. Material is useful in a because you understand what foods are good for you and why. Quite rewarding in that sense.

3.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 23, 2013

Pete is fine - Nutri Sci is an easy way to fulfill a science requirement. He provides information that is useful for daily life, although lectures can get boring. The material is straight forward and if you do old practice exams a few times, you should be set as far as exams go.

4.0
2.0
NS132
Dec 23, 2013

Class work-load is extremely light and non-stressful. It is all memorization and multiple choice. Still, the exams are trickier than you think. I got an A without reading the book at all, but then going to lecture helped a lot. It would be hard to get below a B in class period.

2.0
4.0
NUTRSCI132
Grade: A-
Jan 4, 2014

The worst. Boring and unorganized lectures, pointless homework assignments, and exams that were fully MCQ and called on memorizing past papers, not actual course knowledge. Exams also featured ridiculous questions that aren't key to the course at all. Not worth the time.

3.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Jan 10, 2014

Prof. Anderson was a boss. Class was easy with a good amount of homework and that was very easy. Didn't read the book once. Just memorize the old tests and you will get an A in the class. Its tough to get anything lower than a B in the class. PS You will love the way he pronounces some words LOL

4.0
2.0
NS132
Jan 20, 2014

Terrible grading scale, got a 96% on the first midterm and still got an AB. He makes the tests ridiculously easy and still grades on a curve. Pretty hard to get below a B, but still pretty hard to get an A.

3.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Mar 4, 2014

Pete is the man hands down. You wanna learn a bunch of stuff about vegetables and what not this is the class for you. Great man great example of a model citizen

4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
May 5, 2014

I took this class because everyone said it was easy. All you had to do was memorize the previous exams and you would get an A. HE CHANGED ALL OF THE TESTS. Only about 50% of the questions are recycled questions now. Never learned anything in lecture. Just reviewed homework and past tests to study. Still will probably get a B.

4.0
1.0
NUTRSCI132
May 6, 2014

Easiest class I have ever had. I probably only went to class about 10 times and got an A. Class can be painfully boring so don't bother going. If you skip a lot, at least try to study an hour before the final though.

4.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
May 7, 2014

Pete is an absolute LEGEND. Amazing guy and he knows what he is talking about. The man, the myth the legend, Pete Anderson. Take the class if you want an easy A. Just read the book and do the practice exams. Pete loves you and loves your GPA.

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
May 10, 2014

content in class is interesting, but some facts are outdated. stick with what he teaches rather than what new medical studies find

1.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
May 11, 2014

Took this class because it was notorious for being a GPA booster and I'm not much of a science person, but turns out the University critiqued the course and changed it so this semester it was no long considered "easy". Pete is extremely disorganized and what he lectures often contradicts with what's in the textbook.

1.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
May 11, 2014

Online assignments are both frequent, long and absolutely useless. They're assigned BEFORE you learn the material in lecture so the homework it really just a guessing game. Exams are very detail oriented and will ask you about something you learned once a long time ago. Very poorly organized, Pete is confusing and his handwriting is barely legible

1.0
4.0
NS132
Grade: C
May 12, 2014

Decided to take this class to get my biological science requirements out of the way with minimal harm to my GPA. Of course this dude decides to make the class extremely difficult this semester rendering this class and this professor useless. I do not recommend nutritional sciences 132.

1.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
May 12, 2014

Want to attend the worst lecture of ur life? Do u enjoy watching people scribble random thoughts on a chalk board? Do you want to be a part of a class that gets restructured midway through the academic year? Do u love pointless hw where all u do is guess for 3 hours? THAN THIS CLASS IS FOR YOU!! There is no need to go to lect. cause its pointless!!

2.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
May 14, 2014

I was really excited to take this class and I was really disappointed when it actually started. His lectures are boring, and if you don't remember every single detail that he says, the exams will be tough. The homework was all guessing and didn't help at all. Overall, I wouldn't recommend.

3.0
3.0
PEACTIV100
May 19, 2014

His material was the toughest out of the three professors. I don't like the way he writes on the board during lecture instead of using other visuals. He's pretty hard to follow. However, the class itself is extremely easy and an easy A

4.0
1.0
NS132
Grade: A
May 25, 2014

Despite all the negative comments on this page, I do think NS 132 is a class which differentiates students who are genuinely interested in the study of nutrition and others are lured by the hearsay of "GPA booster class". Nevertheless, do your homework and read the textbook frequently. In addition, attend the lectures and you will do great!

3.0
4.0
NS132
Jul 8, 2014

Interesting material, but his lecture is very unorganized and sporadic. Exams are more difficult than expected and always have information not covered in lecture. He wrote the book, which as poorly organized as his lecture. Still, he tries to make the class applicable to life and keep it interesting

1.0
4.0
NS132
Aug 11, 2014

Awful teacher. Awful textbook. Awful Classwork. Awful Tests. Just avoid.

2.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Oct 2, 2014

This is not the easy class that people make it out to be. I had a 3.9 GPA going into this class and blew it with a BC in this class. People claim the tests are easy and they used to be but recently he made them a lot harder. He is also not a very good teacher. Lectures were meh. I felt misdirected for test prep. Practices tests didn't help.

2.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B-
Oct 28, 2014

Lectures are very easy and boring, but the tests are hard. Study the book a lot. He wrote it himself so you really don't have to come to lecture to know what's going on, as long as you read. Study for the tests and you'll do fine.

2.0
5.0
KINES100
Grade: B
Nov 2, 2014

WORST professor ever. Super unorganized and does't know a things he's saying. He just throws random stuff on the board and doesn't explain at all.

2.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Nov 6, 2014

Interesting subject matter, but during some of the more complex topics his disorganization and lack of clarity become transparent. Additionally, I've found that nothing can "truly" prepare you for his exams as a lot of unseen material manages to appear on the exams.

4.0
4.0
NUTRISCI332
Grade: C
Nov 8, 2014

He is super nice though!

4.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Nov 20, 2014

You don't have to show up to lecture, and these people are off. It's at least an easy AB.

5.0
2.0
NS132
Nov 22, 2014

Ignore the other comments about NS 132. I'm a freshman and it's not tough at all. Go to lectures and do the readings and the class isn't hard. I'm getting an AB and don't have to study very hard at all. On his website he has old exams which are exactly what he bases his current exam from, he even has some of the same questions on them.

4.0
3.0
NUTRSCI132
Dec 1, 2014

This class isn't necessarily an easy A, it requires work to do well on the exams but overall its a fairly stress free class. There are lengthy but easy online homework assignments for each chapter and a super easy nutritional analysis assignment. He posts old exams online and some questions appear on current exams. Lectures tend to be unorganized.

5.0
1.0
132
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2014

Big fan of this dude. Super chill, has been doing it for years. Really easy course (Nutr132) when I took it. Practice exams are clutch, utilize them. He's an old guy that understands you're in college so he's a bro about relatively everything. Overall, he's a great teacher and people who argue against that probably didn't show up to class ever.

3.0
3.0
NS132
Dec 5, 2014

Homework takes forever: 100+ questions that you HAVE to get correct or it will not count towards the counter, all for only 7% of your grade. Exams are literally memorizing definitions, absolutely not worth the time. Everyone says it is an "easy A", but it is not. The professor seems fine, but his class sucks.

2.0
1.0
NUTRSCI132
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2014

You will die of boredom in lecture if nutrition doesn't interest you. You don't even need to go to lecture if you don't want to. Homework is long but exams are pure memorization from past exams, uses word for word questions. Easy A

4.0
4.0
N132
Dec 13, 2014

Pete's class is interesting and he's very passionate about the subject but be prepared for tricky test questions that are very specific. You won't do well on tests just by simply attending lecture or doing the online homework. Lots of extra work is necesarry to do well on Pete's tests. Overall he's a cool professor.

4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B-
Dec 14, 2014

This class is no longer an easy A, he literally switched up his whole curriculum. Homework assignments are long and boring. However, if you're interested in nutrition, this class is for you. DON"T TAKE THIS CLASS IF YOU WANT AN EASY GRADE

2.0
5.0
NS132
Dec 17, 2014

Horrible professor. Impossible to do well on exams. Horrible organization.

5.0
1.0
NS132
Dec 17, 2014

The class is very information heavy but by paying attention in lecture and going over past exams one can get a very easy hold on the material. The assignments are hard and one is better googling the information, but if you pay attention to the classes it's much better. Overall nice teacher that makes sure lecture doesn't go over time, makes it fun.

2.0
5.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 18, 2014

Worst class ever. Boring, boring, boring, can I add boring?..I love nutrition, but this class did not satisfy my expectations. I was more interested in reading my English book than paying attention to the lecture. The book you have to buy is not worth the money. Pete is a nice professor, but it's hard to get an A. DO NOT TAKE CLASS.

1.0
4.0
132
Grade: A-
Dec 18, 2014

Textbook was mad expensive, homework assignments were a time suck but not difficult in the least. The amount of studying for the exam does not correlate at all with your grade. Final exam is killer, and cumulative, which requires way too much memorization. This class is no longer an Easy A, do not take it if you have heard that it was.

3.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 19, 2014

Lectures are pretty disorganized; he likes to jump around topics. Some material is covered extensively while some is barely touched on. Tests were mostly what is to be expected, but they're only 50 multiple choice questions & he throws in at least 5 randoms that, from what I can tell, are not covered at all in lecture and typically not in the book.

4.0
1.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 31, 2014

Professor Anderson is really knowledgable and passionate in his field, and that comes through in lectures. If you go to class, you do not need to read. He doesn't include things that were in the book but not in lecture, so don't waste your time. The homework is annoying, but the project and the tests are really simple. Easy science credit.

4.0
4.0
132
Grade: C
Jan 13, 2015

Pete is well known at UW but this class is a toss up. He is funny and very knowledgeable but the class is definitely not an easy A anymore. Never really read the book but you have to buy (its expensive) if you want to do the homework. Homework takes a while but you get a 100 on it as long as you complete it. Tests are straight memorization: so hard

3.0
3.0
NUTRISCI
Jan 21, 2015

Harder class than expected. Did not learn too much. Disorganized lecture, but is still a really nice guy. Make sure to study for the tests and be prepared to be asked quite a few random questions. And when in doubt, the answer is always "beans and legumes".

2.0
3.0
132
Grade: B
Jan 27, 2015

Lectures are fairly interesting (could be more so) and not a ton of notes. Homework is essentially busy work. Tests are straight memorization, do the practice tests and you'll get a B. My problem with Pete was my communication with him. At the end of the semester I was .12 points away from an AB. Pete got very rude with me and started name calling.

4.0
3.0
132
Feb 5, 2015

I have to admit, the class is fairly dry, and his handwriting is very messy. I would not say it is an easy grade, at least do the practice exams several times and memorize all his lecture notes will get you an AB.... Pointless homework, nothing is relevant.

1.0
5.0
NUTRISCI132
Mar 14, 2015

Lots of reading and irrelevant assignments. Online homework, which if you get the a question wrong, it makes you answer different ones intil you get it correct before you can move on. It takes 3 hours per assignment. Test information and book information are not the same.

1.0
5.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B-
May 9, 2015

I would not recommend this class. The long online assignments and long readings aren't worth it. The only way to do good in the class is to study the previous exams. The test don't match up with anything he talks about in lecture.

3.0
3.0
132
Grade: A-
May 15, 2015

Lecture can be quite boring, but some of the material is interesting. Tests are hard because they don't match up with lectures but if you memorize old tests you should get a BAB. Homework is timely but is only a completion grade so it's easy. Not much outside of class work.

1.0
4.0
NUTRSCI132
Grade: B+
Jun 1, 2015

HW is *irrelevant to tests. HW ?'s come from a diff. book than the one assigned & often contradict lect. Key to an A: ***Memorize past exams and electronic practice tests on L@UW. Read book. Optional discussion is worthless. Positive: Worst exam gets dropped. Good curve. (Wish someone told me these tips when I started class.) Final tough.

3.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Jun 17, 2015

The class had the potential to be really interesting, but the lectures were really disorganized. Test questions were usually easy (shout out to Pete for providing us with multiple old exams for memorizing(: ), but they were occasionally random questions we had never seen before (ahem, third test--average was quite low). Loves his beans&legumes 3

3.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
Sep 10, 2015

Prof. Anderson has a very old-school style of teaching (blackboard and chalk), and I found it hard to take good notes. The homework had almost nothing to do with the course material/test material. He is knowledgeable in his field and has taught the course many times. The material can be interesting and relevant to your own life.

4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
Oct 6, 2015

I thought Pete was a clear, organized professor. I knew exactly what was expected of me and there wasn't a whole lot of grey area. This class honestly changed my health habits and I would recommend it to anyone, especially freshmen as it is easy if you put some time into it.

3.0
2.0
NUTRSCI132
Nov 19, 2015

Nicest man ever. Sometimes confusing and hard to follow in lecture, but honestly all you need to know is in the book.

3.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Nov 20, 2015

Pete is a nice guy but he has some of he most disorganized and confusing lectures I've ever had. The material for the class isn't too complicated but the test questions are nit picky and overcomplicated.

4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B
Dec 3, 2015

Pete is great at lecturing, but is a bit unorganized and zany. However, he is a nice guy and very willing to help and answer questions. Take the practice exams online before the real exams. Most information for exams is NOT from the textbook, and he will tell you that as well. Lectures get boring, but can be applied to real life.

1.0
4.0
NS132
Dec 9, 2015

Online version of NS 132 sucks. Lectures, Readings and homework don't go together at all. Readings are super long, and the homework assignments are time consuming. Worst test grade gets dropped so thats nice. Make sure to do old exams that are on Learn@UW cause he re-uses old questions.

5.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: A-
Dec 17, 2015

Pete is honestly the nicest guy. The lectures that get into the chemistry and bio (there aren't many) get a little boring but its hard to make that stuff interesting. The rest is really interesting, and even though he isn't the most organized guy, he is fun to listen to and if you ever have questions he would be happy to answer them. Cutest guy.

4.0
2.0
NS132
Grade: A
Jan 5, 2016

Really easy class. Lectures are interesting enough, and he has optional discussions. Keeps material easy enough for an intro class and is very flexible if you need test accommodations. Awesome Guy. Easy bio sciences credit.

3.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B
Mar 3, 2016

First 2 units of the semester were well taught and organized well during lecture. However, on the 3rd and 4th units of the semester lecture notes became severely unorganized. The curve he says will be applied at the semester is incorrect and not representative. Writes own textbook only available online and charges you for a code each semester.

3.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: A
May 8, 2016

Pete is a great professor and is very knowledgeable about Nutrition. You will learn a lot just from going to lecture, but there is a lot in the textbook that he doesn't spend a lot of time going over and is worth looking at for the exams. He provides a lot of resources for exam practice. I would take Pete again.

3.0
4.0
NUT132
Grade: B
May 11, 2016

Pete is a super nice and cool guy, and is there for help when you need it. His lectures though are very disorganized and I never really know what is important. There is online homework which take forever and are super annoying. Overall, this class was supposed to be an easy A and it isn't, at all.

2.0
4.0
KINES100
Grade: B-
May 16, 2016

Very weird grading scale for this class, and often times felt very confused by his lectures. He just writes on the board and if you have no previous knowledge you are not going to pass. Probably my least favorite professor ever.

3.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: B
May 17, 2016

Don't take this class unless you are really interested in it, because otherwise it is boring and the lectures are extremely pointless. It makes it hard to put effort into this class because it is so stupid and the exams are not easy and seem to have not that much to do with lecture, the hw or the book. Don't take this just to take another class.

3.0
2.0
NS132
Grade: A
Jun 1, 2016
Would take again

Reviews on here are a little harsh; Pete is a super nice guy who knows a lot about what he does. His lectures are disorganized, but all that really matters is that you take notes and do the homework. Studying for the tests is the most important, and just look at the past exams! He also posts reviews that are helpful for further understanding.

5.0
3.0
NS132
Oct 9, 2016
Would take again

Great guy. Tests aren't easy, but they are definitely fair. He's a bit scatterbrained but gets all of the necessary information through to his class.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
4.0
NS132
Grade: Incomplete
Oct 27, 2016
Would take again

Pete is great, and he's so passionate & intelligent!

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
NS132
Nov 12, 2016
Would take again

Pete is awesome! Super nice guy, lectures can sometimes be boring but everything you need to know he says. Tests are not that hard, just do the practice exam and the post exams because he uses a lot of the same questions! Readings are not that important, but helps you know whats coming in lecture.

Get ready to read
Caring
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
5.0
N132
Grade: B-
Nov 15, 2016
Would take again

I am a Junior and Pete has given me the lowest grade I have even gotten in a class. A BC. Beware, this class is much harder than people say it is.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
3.0
3.0
N132
Grade: A-
Nov 28, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Pete is a great guy, and the material presented is definitely interesting. Not a terribly hard class, but the course has been getting more difficult within the past couple years. Be sure to not only study notes and online textbook, but also old tests. On a 50 question midterm, about 20 of the questions will be repeats.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
Hilarious
4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A+
Dec 8, 2016
Would take again

Pete is a good guy who is genuinely passionate about what he teaches. He is always more than willing to help students and willing to discuss personal concerns. This class is not hard at all if you read and attend his lectures. Studying old tests really helps, too! He makes all the resources very accessible and is very straight forward. Great class!

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
4.0
NS132
Grade: A
Dec 14, 2016
Would take again

Overall good class, and Petes a nice guy. Make sure to do the old exams he posts, because a lot of the questions will be repeated on the new exam.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Hilarious
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
NSC132
Dec 14, 2016
Would take again

Dr. Anderson is a good lecturer. I enjoyed the class, and if you miss a lecture and have someone to get notes from, you'll be fine. It's very clear what you're expected to complete, and there's not too much work to do outside of class other than some online homework assignments. The exams are not too hard either, and the lowest midterm is dropped.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
NTRSC132
Dec 15, 2016
Would take again

Pete's lectures are good, he writes everything on the chalk board and goes through it well. There's a ton of info in this course and I like how he presented it

Respected
TEST HEAVY
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
NUTRISCI123
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2016
Would take again

If you're thinking about taking a class with Pete, do it. I think the overall rating of him isn't a good reflection. Petes a nice guy, teaches well - but this class will probably be a lot harder than you expect a for a nutri sci class; which is where I think the low rating of him comes from.

Tough Grader
Respected
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
5.0
5.0
NS132
Grade: A
Dec 18, 2016
Would take again

Good class, good professor, but be ready to put in a good amount of work to do well

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
5.0
4.0
NS132
Dec 18, 2016
Would take again

Took this as an easy science credit and quickly realized it is not an easy science credit. However, Petes a nice guy who cares about his students

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
Dec 20, 2016
Would take again

I love Pete! He is a funny guy who gives good lectures. The class is relatively easy, just go to class OR read the textbook, remember to do the online assignments which are graded only on completion. The tests are not easy, but you can definitely get a high B at least with decent studying and taking the old tests he sends out for practice.

TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Amazing lectures
1.0
1.0
NS132
Dec 22, 2016
Wouldn't take again

The University of Wisconsin-Madison needs to seriously consider the employment of Pete Anderson at their institution. I have many problems with this class starting with: 1) The required textbook that costs hundreds of dollars is written by, who else, Pete, and is riddled with spelling and grammatical errors, as do his emails and other course...

LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
4.0
NSC132
Grade: A
Dec 24, 2016
Would take again

All the reviews which stated how expensive the textbook was are false. I got the text book online (as pete suggested) for $90. Pete is a very good professor who makes it very clear how to do well in his class. One of my favorite classes I've ever taken at the UW

Tough Grader
Respected
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
N132
Grade: A
Dec 29, 2016
Would take again

I leaned more useful information in this class then probably any other in my undergraduate experience to this point. It was not that hard, but did require you to study for the exams. Just take the practice exams and visit your TA once before each midterm and you will have no problem getting at least a high B on the midterms

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: A
Dec 29, 2016
Would take again

Guide to getting an A in Nutrisci 132: Go to most lectures (Tophat questions are graded but you only need 60% correct throughout year), dont forget to do all online homeworks (even though they take forever but super easy), Midterms-DEVOTE MOST OF YOUR TIME TO STUDYING PAST TESTS! If you study every single available past Tests questionA & do review

Respected
TEST HEAVY
Caring
4.0
3.0
NUTR132
Grade: B
Jan 20, 2017
Would take again

Don't take this class unless you have to or are interested in nutrition. I really enjoyed the class and found it interesting. As long as you study really hard for the exams/go to lecture, you'll do fine. Take the practice ones over and over (consider memorizing questions that frequently show up across test or that you get wrong, they are verbatim)

2.0
3.0
N132
Grade: B
Apr 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Pete is really a nice guy, but his lectures are just read from the book... which he wrote. He isn't the most organized in terms of his lectures, as they really don't flow very well. All of his midterms have questions from past midterms, so memorize those when studying online. I'm not a big fan of the class, can get to be too much memorization.

Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
2.0
4.0
NS132
Grade: B
May 10, 2017
Wouldn't take again

The most time intensive online class at UW (I've taken 5 others in different departments). Complete memorization for the exams and the "review guides" are often posted without answers. Can be interesting information, but online lectures are extremely dry and overly detailed. Plus online book doesn't match with his page numbers he mentions.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
1.0
5.0
N132
Grade: A-
May 12, 2017
Wouldn't take again

The tests are pure memorization of old tests he posts online, but unless you have a photographic memory it is extremely hard to do well. Pete is the worst prof I've ever had yet. The class is disorganized, boring, and you cannot read his handwriting. I would strongly strongly discourage anyone from taking this course.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
5.0
N132
Grade: A-
May 12, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Don't take this course, absolutely awful because of Pete. He is disorganized and the worst lecturer I have ever had. I don't know how or why he is still employed at UW. Honestly I have never been more upset about a course I've taken. He tests you on a level way above lecture, the only way to pass the tests is to memorize old qs from past exams

2.0
2.0
N132
Grade: A
May 12, 2017
Wouldn't take again

The professor's lectures for this class are really scattered. I found it faster and easier to get the information from the book and skip lecture, which just jumbled up concepts and was difficult to read and follow. One exam can be dropped, and the last one is the hardest, so do well on the first ones and you won't even have to take the last one.

4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Jun 22, 2017
Would take again

Since this class is online, you definitely need to keep up with the lectures and class work. Tests are pretty decent, no tricks.

Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
3.0
4.0
N132
Grade: C+
Jun 26, 2017
Would take again

Heard the class was a "football player class" and it would be easy , so I skipped a lot before the first exam, they were wrong. The tests are very fact based and pure memorization. Pete pretty much reads directly from the textbook, which he wrote, so as long as you're going to class and doing the readings you should be alright.

Skip class? You won't pass.
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: A
Aug 15, 2017
Would take again

Pete is a great professor who is really passionate about what he does. There is a lot of reading in the textbook, but if you read it and take notes, it will help you understand the lectures much more. If you go to class and read the book, you should be able to easily get an A.

Clear grading criteria
2.0
3.0
NUTR132
Grade: A
Aug 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

I enjoyed the material the class covered. It was definitely time consuming but there weren't any difficult topics. If you put in the time to memorize various terms and functions, you'll do well. I think Pete would reuse emails from previous terms because the information was incorrect on multiple occasions.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
1.0
3.0
NSC132
Grade: B
Dec 14, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Hated Nutri Sci with Pete. Pretty good student and got good grades in all other classes. His lectures couldn't be anymore boring.

Tough Grader
Tests are tough
4.0
3.0
NUTR132
Grade: A-
Dec 18, 2017
Would take again

The lectures are kind of dry, but try to go to them because I find them a little more interesting than reading the textbook. Read the textbook for stuff you didn't understand in lecture. When preparing for the tests, just take all the past exams he has posted on the class site, because a good 70% of the questions are re-used.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
NS132
Grade: A+
Dec 21, 2017
Would take again

Pete is the best!! Really sparked my interest in nutrition. Great class if you're undecided!

Respected
Hilarious
Caring
4.0
4.0
NS132
Dec 24, 2017
Would take again

Do all practice tests online because the real tests are mostly based off those repeated questions. Review sessions before tests are helpful. Homework can be time consuming, but only every once in a while. Pete's a funny guy who is passionate about the subject, his home garden, and his bike that he rides to work everyday. Generally liked the class.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
2.0
5.0
NUTRISCI132
Dec 24, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Pete was a nice guy, but he was very unorganized and his lectures jumped around a lot. Tests dont reflect what is learned in lecture. If you take this class, focus on studying past test questions Pete posts online, as many questions are recycled into his new tests. Also, focus on the readings rather than lecture content.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
Get ready to read
2.0
4.0
NS132
Dec 24, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Professor was a great guy, but I had trouble staying focused during lecture. Took the class thinking it would be an "easy" science credit but realized it required more effort. To prepare for the tests, study past exams, take practice quizzes, and read the textbook. Online homework was easy but time-consuming. Tests make up majority of grade.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
NS132
Grade: A
Dec 25, 2017
Would take again

Pete is a classic case of great guy, OK teacher. I needed to reschedule an exam due to a family emergency, and he was personal and sympathetic. Tests roughly reflect what's learned in lecture. Use the tests from past semesters,take practice quizzes, and go to the TA discussion sections and the test reviews. Info is informational and practical.

Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
2.0
5.0
NURT132
Grade: B
Jan 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I hated this class. I got strait A's except for this class and I have never studied for anything as hard as I did for this class. He tests on the stupidest little unrelated things and there is so much information. Material is interesting but he is an awful professor.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
4.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: A
Feb 25, 2018
Would take again

Pete is a super great guy, but his lectures are typical. They aren't overly fascinating or overly boring. The homework was annoying and the textbook was never tested, but I would definitely go to lecture or else you will not succeed. Tests weren't bad but use all of the available material (past exams, notes, review guides) to study.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
N132
Grade: B
Mar 21, 2018
Would take again

Nutri Sci is easy if you pay attention in class and make sure to take notes from the book on your own. One of the exams gets dropped but try hard on the first ones. Many of the questions from the practice midterms he gives you are used on your actual midterm.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
2.0
5.0
NS132
Grade: B-
Apr 25, 2018
Wouldn't take again

There is sooo much information on the midterms. Everything he says in lecture is brief, while questions on midterms are extremely specific and confusing. I really struggled finding out a good way to study for this class. But he uses a lot of the same exact questions out of the practice exams, so study all of those for sure and read the book.

TEST HEAVY
5.0
1.0
NS132
Grade: A
May 5, 2018
Would take again

Tests compromise your grade, but they're soooo easy. As long as you go to lecture, you know what info is gonna be covered on the exam. Obviously the midterms have a lot of info on them, but 80% of the questions are recycled from old exams- this class is a no-brainer. And although pete sometimes went out of order in lecture, he made the info easy

TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
2.0
NS132
Grade: A+
May 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

HW was time consuming for only being worth 7%, textbook was stupid expensive for what it's worth. For an A: Go to lecture every day. Read the book & retake notes before the exam. Study from old exams (recycled exam questions are used a LOT). Go to reviews. The material really isn't that hard if you actually try. Pete is nice, wish he did powerpoint

Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
NSC132
Grade: B
Dec 13, 2018
Would take again

Nice prof, easy to meet with outside class, clear what you need to know and comes with an online textbook. He writes all his lectures on the chalkboard so if you miss you have to get notes from someone or take book notes which are not always the same info he wants you to know. Go to lecture, take good notes, study for the exams and you'll do fine.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
4.0
3.0
NUTR132
Grade: A-
Dec 21, 2018
Would take again

Has hilarious outfits. Lectures are all done on the chalk board. Pretty typical guy.

4.0
2.0
NS132
Grade: A
Jan 1, 2019
Would take again

Pete is a funny man who makes nutrition interesting - most of the time. It is challenging to follow his notes in class, as he often just writes words or phrases on the chalkboard without much explanation. The class overall is well organized and very straightforward. He is very approachable and understanding.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
NSCI132
Jan 6, 2019
Would take again

Pete was an amazing professor. He is really passionate about what he teaches and obviously has a lot of personal experience. What is said in lectures is on the tests so take good notes. The book isn't necessary and the homework is a bit time consuming but Pete made it worth it! 10/10 want to take his class again!

Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Caring
4.0
4.0
NSCI132
Grade: B
Jan 10, 2019
Would take again

Pete was so sweet. You could tell he really cared about the class. In general, almost everything he lectures on is in the book so attendance isn't really mandatory. All exams were almost exact replicas of the past tests he posts online so use those. Pretty science heavy so beware of that.

Clear grading criteria
TEST HEAVY
Caring
5.0
3.0
NURT132
Grade: A
Jan 15, 2019
Would take again

Prof Pete is a great guy. He has written the textbook himself so most of the stuff in his lecture matches the textbook. DO the past question papers before the exam, they compromise of 80% of the questions. The final exam is way harder, so read the textbook really well . Attending lectures makes it easier to remember and study the material.

Respected
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
NSCI132
Grade: A
Jan 21, 2019
Would take again

An amazing person and clearly very passionate about nutrition. Lectures are entertaining and easy to follow. Test questions are heavily graded off of old exams and stuff said in lectures so its so important to go and take good notes. This class requires a good amount of studying, but its very passable and really interesting.

Respected
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Amazing lectures
5.0
2.0
NS132
Grade: A
Jan 21, 2019
Would take again

The class itself is pretty easy to score if you go to the lecture and read the textbook. Assignments are not heavy at all. 3 midterms but only 2 are counted for final grade. All in all, chill class and easy to get an A.

LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
NS132
Jan 22, 2019
Would take again

Interesting class. Great professor. The lectures may get a little bit boring at times, but Pete is an awesome professor. He's very knowledgable and very experienced. He can answer almost any question you have. My only thing is the lecture was super large, so it was difficult to participate and make yourself known, but overall I'd recommend it.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B
Apr 3, 2019
Would take again

There are like 3 100 question online assignments due every week which are easy but annoying because exam's don't test that material. The exams only test lecture material and always have some trick questions or questions that seem to ask about material that he never talked about. He posts no lecture notes so you are forced to go to class every day

Lots of homework
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
NUTRI132
May 5, 2019
Would take again

Pete is a really awesome guy but the structure of the class wasn't ideal. We had to buy a very expensive textbook to do the HW which was graded on completion but it's like 100 questions that aren't even relevant to test material. He doesn't post lectures, so you pretty much have to go to class. I learned a lot, but the tests had tricky questions

Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: A-
May 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

His hand writing is extremely terrible. I got a exactly 90% overall score, but this professor used a hilarious curve such that A >90.x Not recommended to anyone else!!!

Test heavy
Tough grader
3.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: A-
May 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I would not recommended this class for people who think it will be an easy A. Our averages were a BC for every single test, and our final had an average of a 75. The test questions were ridiculous if they weren't on the practice tests given before hand. Great guy, but this class could have been taught a lot better.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Test heavy
Clear grading criteria
3.0
3.0
NUSCI132
Grade: B
May 13, 2019
Would take again

I took this class online and had a fairly difficult time with it. Pete is an awesome guy but the lectures he posts have no visuals to look at and you basically have to watch a black screen and try to keep up with what he says with the frequent handwriting stops. Exam questions are all very difficult unless they were on previous exams.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
4.0
3.0
NURT132
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2019
Would take again

You can get an A in this class if you put in effort. Just show up to lecture and take good notes. Lectures move fast and Pete has poor handwriting so just try to keep up. Utilize the practice exams because many questions on the midterms are the exact same. Make a quizlet to study and read the textbook if you miss lecture and you'll be fine.

Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
NURTI132
Grade: A
Dec 30, 2019
Would take again

Pete is a good, friendly professor who is passionate about nutrition. He assigns homework for every chapter online, graded on participation, and content is usually not tested. Exams are the bulk of the grade, with 3 midterms and a final. Study the practice exams online and review lecture notes (only lecture material is tested) and you'll do fine.

Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
NUTRSCI132
Grade: C+
Apr 8, 2020
Wouldn't take again

At first I was really excited to take this class and learn about nutritional science, but it all went downhill. I attended every lecture and exam review session but those did not help. Make sure you know the material and review the old exams (but even those don't help sometimes). Pete is a great guy, but his lectures did not help at all.

Test heavy
Clear grading criteria
3.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: B-
Apr 20, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Professor Anderson was a very friendly guy. His lectures are all on the chalkboard and a bit boring. Honestly, I did not like this class. The first three exams weren't too bad, but then the final exam was very difficult and hurt my grade a lot. There were reading quizzes. I don't recommend this class.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
4.0
2.0
NUTRISCI132
May 1, 2020
Would take again

This class & Pete are not nearly as bad as students make it out to be. Tests are pretty much the same as the practice exams and review slides fill in the gaps. Even casually listening to the lectures and taking a few notes will get you 90s on the exams.

Test heavy
1.0
4.0
NS132
May 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This seems like an interesting class, but Pete is not the right teacher for it. Take another bio science class for gen eds.

5.0
3.0
NURTI132
Grade: A
May 15, 2020
Would take again

Online Section. Watch the lectures and take the practice exams and youll do fine. Dont bother reading the textbook- the exams are based on lecture material. Assigned homework was tedious but relatively easy.

Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B+
May 27, 2020
Would take again

(132 Online) Anderson was a good lecturer and you can tell he's passionate about nutrisci. I had a friend taking the in-person class while I was taking it online and through comparison, they were pretty much the same. The lectures are a bit long when they're posted online, but if you break them up they're manageable. Overall, great class and useful

Respected
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
NUTRI132
Grade: A-
Dec 6, 2020
Would take again

Course is pretty doable if youre not into science, and honestly pretty interesting. Homework is extremely tedious and honestly just busy work as none of the material appears on exams. Exams can be tricky so study old exams he provides.

2.0
3.0
NTRSC132
Grade: A-
Dec 16, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I took this class because I was interested in nutrition. I would void against taking it for the gen ed. 80 percent of your grade is based on exams. Expensive textbook for hw that doesn't help. He showed no empathy for crazy covid semester. Lectures were a black screen of his voice from a class pre-covid. Didn't help learn, have to self-teach.

Graded by few things
Test heavy
2.0
3.0
NS132
Grade: C
Dec 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I took this class as an elective and had a really hard time. I studies my arse off and still ended up getting mediocre grades on the exams. He is understanding and wiling to work with you, but, I don't think it's worth it. There are definitely better electives out there.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Test heavy
4.0
4.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B+
Apr 28, 2021
Would take again

He seems super nice and chill. I took the class online. The tests were very challenging, but the overall course work isn't too bad. It's definitely not an easy A science class for non science majors.

5.0
5.0
NUTRISCI132
Grade: B+
Jul 9, 2021
Wouldn't take again

This class was great if you really want to know about nutrition, but it was very hard. Readings and assignments didnt correlate to what the tests questioned you on, so STUDY OLD EXAMS! Pete isnt necessarily the best professor, but hes an expert and I think grudge aside he does want you to learn and have fun with it.

Get ready to read
3.0
4.0
NTRSC132
Grade: B
Nov 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Material is pretty straight forward, but the course is not an easy A. Anderson is a great guy, but lecture can get a bit boring at times. Textbook was not used - only needed it for a code to do the HW. Tests are more difficult than you'd expect; use the old practice exams as he recycles a number of questions from them.

Respected
Graded by few things
Test heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

25%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 84 grades
Most common grades:
A (32)
B (18)
A- (13)
Grade Distribution
A(35)B(25)C(7)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(17)
Based on 89 reported grades
A: 32
B: 18
A-: 13
B-: 7
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (15)
Get ready to read (14)
TEST HEAVY (14)
Respected (11)
LECTURE HEAVY (9)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (9)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (9)
Test heavy (9)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.57 avg change
Apr
May
Dec
Apr
Jul
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

NUTRISCI123

5.0

(2)

NUTRITIONALSCI

5.0

(1)

NUTRITION134

5.0

(1)

NUT1987

5.0

(1)

NTRSC001

5.0

(1)
+34 more courses
Difficulty by Course

NUTRI124

5.0

PEACT100

4.5

KINES100

4.5

PE100

4.0

NUTRISCI332

4.0

Similar Professors