2.1

Ramesh Agarwal

Science - Rutgers - State University of New Jersey

2.1
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
107
Reviews
2.1
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
2.3
Helpful
1.9
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

107

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
107 total ratings

5

8

4

15

3

20

2

14

1

50

What Students Say

The class is a waste of time

CHM162 - 1.0 rating

He sells you his notes, and then just reads them to you in front of the class

CHM16116 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (1)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 2 reported grades
A+: 1
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.46 avg change
Dec
Apr
May
Aug
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CC162

5.0

(1)

GENCHEM2

4.0

(1)

CHEM2

4.0

(1)

CHEMI161

4.0

(1)

165

3.0

(1)
+24 more courses
Difficulty by Course

162

5.0

CHM162

5.0

CHM161

5.0

CHEM160

5.0

CHM2

5.0

Reviews (106)
3.0
3.0
165
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CHEM
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CHEM
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CHM162
Jan 6, 2003

This man can't teach. He is AWFUL. The class is a waste of time.

1.0
4.0
CHM16116
Jan 15, 2003

He sells you his notes, and then just reads them to you in front of the class.

1.0
3.0
CHM161162
Mar 7, 2003

He sucks as a human

1.0
4.0
CHEM1612
Mar 10, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CHEM161
Mar 11, 2003

No Comments

3.0
5.0
CHEM161
Mar 12, 2003

He's not understandablea when he speaksa. It seemsa to bea a problema.

1.0
5.0
CHM161
Mar 13, 2003

No Comments

1.0
4.0
161
Mar 13, 2003

he-ah, doesnt speak-ah ...how do you say...english-ah.. understandbly-ah.

1.0
5.0
CHEM161
Mar 13, 2003

DONT TAKE HIM! HE SUCKS!

1.0
5.0
CHM161
Mar 14, 2003

This man makes me want to drop out of school.

1.0
4.0
161162
Mar 14, 2003

Unclear, boring. Got an A and B+, with lots of studying. Buy the notes, don't go to lecture.

4.0
4.0
GENCHEM2
Mar 26, 2003

All things considered, he is actually a good teacher. He has an accent, but you can understand the guy.

1.0
3.0
CHEM161
Mar 27, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CHEM161
Mar 28, 2003

quite simply, he's a bloody paki. he isn't understandable. i can read to the class for an hour and twenty minutes with foam coming out the corners of my mouth, as well

1.0
5.0
CHEM101
Mar 31, 2003

He sells his notes and then reads them to you. Pointless going to class if you have notes.

1.0
5.0
CHEMISTRY
Mar 31, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
CHEMII
Mar 31, 2003

Hard teacher. Barley speaks English. Nice guy though

3.0
4.0
CHM12
Apr 1, 2003

he was a nice man and a fair grader but he was not a very effective teacher...i didn't learn anything , but chemistry itself sucks, too. his foaming at the mouth was really, really gross.

2.0
4.0
CHEM161
Apr 9, 2003

No Comments

1.0
4.0
CHEM101
Apr 10, 2003

If you..um..take 101 millimeters..um..of hyDROgen, and um..you mix it..um..with 320 millimeters of um..oxYgen....

2.0
5.0
CHEM101
May 2, 2003

this is a tough course! Nice guy, but I get the feeling that they want to use the course to winnow out the non-chemists rather than to TEACH chemistry to those that need it to graduate. I had a 3.9 GPA before this course, but not now....

2.0
4.0
CHEM162
May 7, 2003

No Comments

4.0
2.0
CHEMII
May 8, 2003

If you have his lecture notes, then there really is not point in going to class. I thought his notes were really clear and easy to follow. His lectures were dry, but he was very helpful and was better able to explain stuff at his office hours.

3.0
3.0
161
May 14, 2003

Terrible don't take this guy if you can avoid it find someone else or somewhere else to take chemistry

2.0
5.0
CHEM161
May 17, 2003

Horrible teacher. His notes explain the concepts pretty clearly, but since the exams are all problems, it's not that helpful. The best way to do well in this class is to do the practice problems and pray for a good TA.

1.0
2.0
CHEM162
Jun 20, 2003

to say he's boring is an understatement. unfortunately i had to have him for chem 161 ans 162. never went to class because lectures are pointless, puts you to sleep like a nice sleeping pill. hes not a mean guy, but impossible to stay awake through.

4.0
3.0
CHEM162
Aug 10, 2003

Comared to chem. 160...this ma was a god send. He gives you all the notes he's apporachable and his exams are challenging but reasonable.

3.0
5.0
CHEM162
Sep 2, 2003

very very very boring guy, and notes dont really help b/c all the exams are problems. Exams are insanely hard. hes a smart guy but not a good professor.

1.0
5.0
CHEM162
Sep 16, 2003

Another middle eastern that you cant understand.

1.0
5.0
CHEM160
Sep 27, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
162
Oct 1, 2003

Time to retire Agarwal!

1.0
4.0
CHEM1612
Nov 12, 2003

very very boring lectures, look at half the class and they are asleep. Gives you the notes so don't go to the whole lecture, show up for the last 10 min. to make sure there isn't a lecture quiz, do the homework problems, practice exams, extra help if nee

1.0
3.0
CHEM162
Nov 19, 2003

The man just can't teach. That's all there is to it. All he does is read his notes off the overhead. Completely unclear, and rude.

1.0
3.0
CHEM161
Feb 2, 2004

This guy just sells his notes and preaches them on the overhead in class. He put's you right to sleep. If you really really study the book and go to every lecture and don't fall asleep, you can pull a b or b+...p.s. rude guy but smart

1.0
5.0
161162
Feb 7, 2004

No Comments

1.0
4.0
CHEMISTRY
Feb 9, 2004

boring

2.0
4.0
CHEM
Feb 22, 2004

I would not recommend him to anyone. didnt learn much, very boring. could do a heck of a lot better.

1.0
5.0
161162
Feb 23, 2004

This teacher is the worst in all Rutgers...He cannot teach for his life, he tells you to do the HW problems and practice exams, but they still don't help because his exams are totally different...Do yourself a favor and don't take any of his classes...

1.0
5.0
CHEM
Mar 22, 2004

HORRIBLE CLASS!! CANT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING!! HE PUTS EVERYONE TO SLEEP!! AND YOU HAVE TO SHOW UP FOR CLASS BECAUSE HE GIVES POP QUIZES.....THE WORST CLASS EVER!!!!!

1.0
5.0
CHEM161
Apr 11, 2004

No Comments

4.0
5.0
CHEM161
Apr 13, 2004

Forget it man, this class is not a joke even honors chemistry is better. He just making his money by selling his notes and exam papers its all about the loot. Yet, he's helpful but when exams come forget it mann. Very smart, must done his schoolin away.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1612
Apr 13, 2004

His English is a little shakey, but he gives you all his notes. It was a good nap time...Both Semesters....

3.0
5.0
CHEM161
Apr 15, 2004

DONT BUY THE PRACTICE EXAMS, well just dont rely on them. He's good in office hrs...EXTREMELY HARD!!!!AVOID BY ALL MEANS!!

5.0
1.0
CHEM
Apr 16, 2004

He is definitely not as bad as some of the people below have rate him to be. They just must be really dumb. He might not be easy in class but if you read his notes and do all of the practice exams and do all the hw as assigned then you are bound to get A

3.0
2.0
CHEM161
Apr 17, 2004

As long as you read the book and do the practice tests you'll be find. Don't bother buying the notes they don't help much at all. He is kind of boring...you don't really need to go to class to do well....i got an A :)

2.0
5.0
CHEM161
Apr 19, 2004

This teacher is horrible. He knows his stuff, but he could not teach in lecture. Don't bother going to lecture. This is more like a self-taught class.

5.0
1.0
CHEM161
Apr 23, 2004

Although at 1st its hard to understand his accent which is constantly interrupted by uhs, he's not bad. he has the best notes which r easy to understand&his tests,quizzes&even exams r the easiest compared to Boikess's or Kimmel's. ask anyone who took chem

1.0
5.0
CHEM101
May 11, 2004

stay the f*** away from this guy. another foreigner with bad english teaching a class where you need to understand him. why in the hell do schools hire freaks like this!!! watch the sides of his mouth when he talks...

4.0
1.0
CHEM1612
Jun 4, 2004

i know everybody complains about his english, but he is a good teacher. he gives u the notes and his exams are easy. if u do the hw, ull get a good grade. I would recommend him over any other chem professor.

5.0
1.0
CHEM1612
Jun 7, 2004

Go to class! The class will be difficult if you find no interest in the material (a given for any science). He speaks slowly but be patient, you need to go to class in order to understand his notes. Sample exams are very helpful. Easy with help and effort

2.0
3.0
CHEM161
Jul 19, 2004

Though glimmers of a nice, intelligent, and faintly comedic (he warns the first day of class "I am not an entertainer") man do occasionally show through, these qualities are very much overshadowed by the monotonous tone of his voice. ZZZZZZZZ

1.0
5.0
CHEMII
Aug 26, 2004

The most boringest class of my life

3.0
2.0
CHEM1612
Sep 2, 2004

He is pretty boring and has a monotone voice, but the class truly isn't difficult. I got an A in both 1&2, and I took 2 over the summer. His lecture notes are helpful, and you can easily pass all the exams by practicing with the sample exams.

3.0
2.0
CHEM161
Sep 7, 2004

extremely boring but his notes are very well written. if you can't do chemistry read his notes. they can help. practice exams are good to.

1.0
4.0
CHEM162
Oct 3, 2004

UUUUHHHHH, that's all I have to say

1.0
5.0
CHM2
Oct 6, 2004

ASS WHO CANT TEACH OR SPEAK ENGLISH

4.0
4.0
CHEM2
Oct 27, 2004

He is the ultimate ass of asses. He will not, I repeat make any exception for anyone.He has a nice side and a mean side. Stay on the nice side. DO NOT make noise or walk out on him. Very helpful in office hours. Best chem teacher I have ever had. If you seriously wanna learn chem 2, he is your guy.

1.0
5.0
CHEM161
Nov 1, 2004

This teacher is hands down the worst teacher on earth. he can't talk and can't teach. he teaches straight out of the book and can't even do that well. take this class only if you need to fail. word of advice if you still think u can get n A in this class. YOU CAN'T.at least not with him as a teacher

1.0
5.0
CHEM102
Nov 9, 2004

He is the worst teacher at Rutgers. He reads directly from his notes, which are very sloppy. He still uses an overhead and speaks in a monotone voice. He doesn't care about teaching, only about being there. His tests are hard do he can get a curve and he rally doesn't care about the students.

2.0
5.0
CHEM161
Nov 9, 2004

that man made me hate chemistry! he cant speak english and doesnt know how to teach. lectures are a waste of time-go to a tutor instead. if you do take this course go to the mslc every day-thats the way i passed.

3.0
3.0
CHEM162
Nov 12, 2004

Boring, monotone voice, nice Indian accent, and spits and drools when he talks. Still one of the better Chem professors. Notes from the bookstore are helpful.

3.0
5.0
CHEM162
Nov 17, 2004

Notes might be nice, but wait till u get one of his exams.......ouch!!!very hard

5.0
1.0
CHEM162
Nov 17, 2004

I took chem 162 last semester w/ a diff prof N failed it.So far I'm passing w/ agarwal.Chem isNt easy. If u wanna weigh the LESS evil of da 2 proff, Dr. Agarwal is the 1. TAKE HIS class if u wanna PASS CHEMESTRY IN RUTGERS, BOTH 161, 162. !ATTEND EVERY LECTURE NO MATTER HOW BORING 2 GET B or higher!

4.0
2.0
CHEM162
Nov 20, 2004

He's a good professor and if you take the time to do the work that he assigns, you should be in good shape. Also, recitation teachers are very good, and they help a lot if you have any questions, so just do the work, and don't hesitate to ask questions, and a grade of B or higher is def attainable.

3.0
5.0
CHEM162
Dec 4, 2004

Yes he's boring and monotonous but chem is that kinda subject. What I don't get is how people keep saying he can't speak english. Just because he has an accent doesn't mean he can't speak english. Just because you guys are failing chem, doesn't mean you gotta attack the guy's accent. Geez.

1.0
5.0
CHEM161162
Dec 17, 2004

this guy is terrible. nothing else can be said.

3.0
5.0
CHEM161162
Dec 23, 2004

this guy is a ****

4.0
4.0
CHEM161162
Dec 24, 2004

162 SIGNIFICANTLY harder. Get help. Agarwal's very helpful if you ask (but that may just be girls). Definitely buy lecture notes and practice exams at the co-op.

3.0
5.0
CHEM162
Dec 26, 2004

Good on an individual basis, but terrible in a lecture setting....

1.0
5.0
CHEM
Jan 3, 2005

HIS accent is so terrible so horrible he is the WORST professor known to man kind. DOnt take him he is the reason why i switched majors. You'll regret it if you take him. he made my life miserable. I left RU cause of him. And on top of that i'm an above average student.

5.0
4.0
CHEM162
Jan 17, 2005

true enough this is a hard class, but i thought agarwal did a good job of teaching each. he broke things down so well in my opinion. yeah he's boring, but if you put the effort in you can def do well. lecture wasn't necessary, every word is in the notes i stopped going and got a B+

1.0
5.0
CHEM162
Jan 19, 2005

If you humm a "C" note through the entire class, you won't even know he is talking because that is precisely the only octive he speaks in!! Good luck, bring a HODDEL of coffee to each class. He would most definetly be more successfull with a job giving hummers!

1.0
5.0
CHEM161
Jan 20, 2005

total jerk...helps if you ask questions, but is a terrible grader....has a thick accent. He was absolutely no help in chem recitation..get out as fast as u can if u have him.

4.0
2.0
CHEM161162
Jan 24, 2005

i think agarwal was a really great professor and his notes help a lot. he's organize and he's really really nice. take him. he's the best chem prof!

1.0
4.0
CHEM1
Jan 25, 2005

horrible. 'sells' his notes, boring, that class completely changed my whole direction in life that i was going. went from the sciences to economics. took it my freshman year(2000), worst experience ever, definitely bad for students who like to learn from their professor, and not just the book.

1.0
5.0
CHEM162
Jan 25, 2005

i was gonna major in chem.i loved chem more than anybody. but after i had him.. god damn. i changed my major.i hated chem so much after i had him. this class totally ruined my gpa. chem isn't my thing anymore. no1 knows how much i wanted to major in chem. after i met this fob my life has been ruined

4.0
2.0
CHEM162
Grade: A+
Jan 25, 2005

This prof is really great. The people who complain are those who don't put in the effort and somehow magically expect to get a good grade. You can't do that for any class and esp. not chem 162. Notes and practice exams are awsome help. Just do the work and a B or higher is def attainable.

5.0
4.0
CHEM161
Mar 8, 2005

His notes are very veyr helpful. Go to class otherwise you will fall behind.

3.0
4.0
CHEM161162
Apr 20, 2005

had him for recitation in both Chem 161 and 162. his notes were okay, but he's really hard to understand and not very helpful if you are really struggling. overall, recitation was not that helpful and i really needed it to be

1.0
5.0
CHEM162
May 7, 2005

worst teacher any student could ever have. What school gave this moron a ****in doctorate? In conclusion-a i think-a this professor-a is a dumass-a.

1.0
3.0
CHEM
Jun 20, 2005

No Comments

2.0
3.0
CHEM
Aug 1, 2005

this guy could punch you in the face, and then**** in your mouth, and he'd still have too much tenure to be fired. but if you're in science, plan on seeing him. why even bother rating him? just punch yourself in the face and have a friend**** in your mouth.

1.0
4.0
CHEMII
Aug 13, 2005

I hated having Dr. Agarwal. I don't know how Rutgers lets him teach chemistry. CANNOT UNDERSTAND him. Whoever DOES like him.. must be smoking sh*T to improve their hearing. His lectures are boring and I can't decipher his mumbles. Tried ask him a simple question and HE SHOO-ED ME AWAY!! He's a rude little man! PLEASE, do not take him for your sake.

1.0
5.0
CHEM1AND2
Grade: A
Sep 9, 2005

worst teacher.

2.0
3.0
CHEMISTRY161
Nov 30, 2005

I honestly think I did better by not going to class on Fridays. Dull gibberish sums it up perfectly.

4.0
2.0
CHEM161
Dec 20, 2005

i know he is boring but the guy is really helpful if u reach out to him...if you talk to him, u can manage to get a C in the class when u actually deserve a F...but CHem 161 at rutgers new brunswick at livingston is taught by the evil siegel so your only hope is having helpful recitation ppl like agarwal...

2.0
1.0
CHEM161
Dec 21, 2005

his class is so easy i got a B just showing up to exams - no studying or going to lecture and recitation - the exams are real straightforward.

1.0
1.0
CHEM
Apr 13, 2006

the guy does not explain stuff you need to study your ass off for practice exams and notes for an A

2.0
5.0
CHEM161
May 10, 2006

VERY UNCLEAR!!!

1.0
5.0
CHEM
May 18, 2006

worst ta. couldnt understand a thing he said. very mean. laughed at your misfortunes. i had him 2 semesters in a row and he didnt help at all

1.0
5.0
CHEM161162
Jun 13, 2006

wow what a horrible teacher.

2.0
5.0
CHEM301
May 24, 2007

boring guy

4.0
3.0
CHEMI161
Jan 25, 2008

Agarwal was my recitation instructor, and in the beginning, I dreaded going to his class because he was so monotonous and boring. But when it came down to it, he got the information that we needed to know across to us.

5.0
3.0
CC162
Apr 14, 2008

He's an amazing TA!!! He really helped and was always approachable. the Rest of the people are just bitter

1.0
3.0
CHEM161
Nov 10, 2008

No Comments

3.0
2.0
CHEM161
Dec 5, 2008

I don't know what everybody elses problem with him is, but he is the BEST TA for Chemistry. He is the only TA that looks at the exams beforehand, so he knows what is the important and relevant material and he makes sure that his students know it. Easily one of the best people I have had here.

4.0
2.0
CHEM161
Dec 16, 2008

Had for for chem recitation. Can't really rate him on grades since there were just 3 straight forward quizzes. He has an accent but its recitation so it doesnt really matter. He's very helpful though when you ask questions.

4.0
2.0
CHEM161
Dec 22, 2008

If you have Dr. Agarwal as a Chemistry recitation professor, you're blessed. He actually cares about his students, if you reach out to him. He's great.

2.0
4.0
CHEM161
Apr 1, 2010

He has an accent but you only notice that for the first week. Ask questions and you'll get straight answers. He does the best he can to get students to try and do the work. If you don't do your homework and don't try, you'll get the grade you deserve. I love this TA.

5.0
3.0
CHEM162
May 11, 2012

This man is truly a blessing and is crystal clear in his explanations both in the classroom and at his office hours. He is more than willing to help, and he has so much patience!Chem II was very challenging for me (i devoted MANY hours), but I am so lucky to have had him as a recitation instructor!

3.0
3.0
CHEM161
Aug 29, 2012

Dr. Agarwal tries his best to help students, but he is incredibly boring and slow paced. It is very difficult to pay attention in his recitation, although he does provide good review if you can manage to do so. Unless you want to sit in the front row every recitation, I do not recommend him.

1.0
5.0
CHEMSOLIDGEMS
Jan 31, 2014

I was always so lost in recitation since he skips over parts in problems because he assumes you know it. Very monotone and always look up at the ceiling. I always feel like I was wasting time with him. Would have rather studied by myself but attendance is mandatory.

4.0
2.0
CHEM161
Mar 8, 2014

I enjoy sitting in his recitation class. He is extremely straightforward and easy to understand. He goes over any questions you may have, which isn't often in such classes. He writes a general summary of important points on the board, which is very helpful for the quizzes. His accent is a little strong but you get used to it.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (1)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 2 reported grades
A+: 1
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.46 avg change
Dec
Apr
May
Aug
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CC162

5.0

(1)

GENCHEM2

4.0

(1)

CHEM2

4.0

(1)

CHEMI161

4.0

(1)

165

3.0

(1)
+24 more courses
Difficulty by Course

162

5.0

CHM162

5.0

CHM161

5.0

CHEM160

5.0

CHM2

5.0

Similar Professors