2.9

Ratna Shrestha

Economics - University of British Columbia

2.9
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
49%
Would Retake
298
Reviews
2.9
Quality
3.0
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.7
Clarity

49%

Would Retake

298

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
298 total ratings

5

60

4

63

3

54

2

56

1

65

What Students Say

I enjoyed his lectures and his brilliant mind

ECON311 - 5.0 rating

honestly, why does everyone say he's easy

102 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

64%

Textbook Required

47%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 78 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (21)
A (18)
Not sure yet (15)
Grade Distribution
A(39)B(12)C(7)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(19)
Based on 97 reported grades
A+: 21
A: 18
Not sure yet: 15
A-: 15
Common Tags
Get ready to read (22)
Clear grading criteria (19)
Accessible outside class (17)
Caring (16)
Graded by few things (14)
Tough grader (12)
Test heavy (12)
Lecture heavy (12)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.12 avg change
Jun
Jul
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ECON201

5.0

(1)

COM394

5.0

(1)

ECON101102

4.2

(5)

ECON451

4.0

(1)

ECON320

4.0

(1)
+19 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ECON

5.0

ECOM310311

5.0

295

4.2

102

4.0

301

4.0

Reviews (296)
2.0
3.0
ECON301
Sep 16, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
ECON350
Nov 25, 2003

No Comments

2.0
2.0
ECON350
Nov 28, 2003

doesn't understand questions, doubt he could answer them effectively if he did, teaches mostly about the american system, and is so very very boring.

4.0
2.0
ECON301
Dec 1, 2003

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ECON301
Dec 10, 2003

Avoid him at all costs! Consistantly mixes up his examples in class, can't even present the solutions to the midterm without getting the answer totally wrong, assigns marks randomly, is very viscious when students ask for help, and teaches too slow too.

1.0
4.0
ECON301
Dec 10, 2003

This prof is the worse. He is so boring and can't teach. Ever wonder how some profs become profs when they can't speak proper english. Also, his exams are all messed up. He randomly chooses a number for your subjective questions and refuses to change it.

3.0
2.0
ECON350
Dec 16, 2003

I agree.... he assigns marks randomly..... the answers i hear most frequently in his class are "that's true", "i agree".... he says that every single class when students ask him Q... you don't need to ask him Q.. he only provides these

1.0
4.0
ECON350
Dec 17, 2003

Easily the worst prof I've ever had. Rather than teach well and grade fairly, he simply taught at a first year level but graded completely randomly. I'm still not sure he even understands the course he was teaching. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
5.0
ECON350
Dec 18, 2003

He sux~ the worse prof. I've ever had... HATE HIM SO MUCH... People!! Don't waste your time and money taking his course!!!

3.0
4.0
ECON301
Dec 20, 2003

very very bad teacher.boring and lectures directly from textbooks (even overheads and some test questions are from textbook).what a lazy guy.finalexam was a killer. I could have taught this class better. going to class was pointless

1.0
3.0
ECON301
Dec 22, 2003

boring class....

2.0
4.0
ECON301
Jan 4, 2004

sucks at teaching but a nice guy

1.0
3.0
ECON301
Feb 26, 2004

Worst professor I have ever had. After the first 5 minutes in my first class, I knew he was gonna get all 1s on the ratings. So boring, totally teaches from the book. Marking is obscure. Let's do an anal-LYSIS of an oli-GO-Polly on sopping!

3.0
5.0
ECON301
Mar 6, 2004

I agree with all the bad comments made b4 only that he's clear 'cause he goes SO slow. He sometimes takes marks off for completely correct answers, which u MAY get back if u complain A LOT.

1.0
5.0
ECON301
Mar 6, 2004

Haha~~ How can he be a teacher...PLease Please...take him out...He sucks..totlly not meant to be a teacher.

1.0
5.0
ECON301
Mar 6, 2004

Definitely one of the worst profs in UBC's Econ department bar none. Tries hard to explain his ideas, which is admirable. He's hard, not because he aims to be but because his exams are poorly formatted. Boo.

1.0
5.0
ECON
Apr 24, 2004

No Way!!!!!!!

4.0
1.0
ECON451
Apr 26, 2004

becuz of the previous bad rating i was hesitated to take his course~ but 451 is VERY easy! he was so nice and always give away marks! MUST TAKE this course!

3.0
1.0
ECON301
Apr 29, 2004

I think he is pretty easy and he said only 2 people fail.Make sure you do his practice/sample exams.

4.0
5.0
ECON301
May 8, 2004

a nice guy when u talk 2 him. markin was HIGHLY inconsitent due to his crap TA Shinya Kawahara. In class hes boring, and a bad teacher. if u go to his office hrs hes actually quiet helpful. i did bad in his class. not many fail, but not many hi eithr

4.0
3.0
ECON301
May 21, 2004

HE IS OK IF YOU LISTEN TO HIS LECTURE CAREFULLY AND READ AHEAD OF TIME!

1.0
4.0
301
Jun 17, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ECON301
Jun 23, 2004

Can't teach, can't lecture. Deep down, he seems like a nice guy, but that just doesn't cut it anymore.

5.0
2.0
ECON301
Jun 26, 2004

he's pretty easy. sure the class is boring, but if you pay attention you will notice he explains things very clear. kinda picky with small detail. nice guy. it's not his fault that the material is hard/boring. just remember to do the practice questions.

2.0
4.0
COMM295
Oct 30, 2004

He is a really nice guy, but horrible at teaching. He is hard to understand as well. Dont recommend taking his class.

3.0
4.0
ECON310
Nov 1, 2004

Seems like a nice little man. Can't speak english. Can't teach. But a nice little man.

4.0
3.0
COMM295
Nov 28, 2004

OK so this class IS kinda boring.. but this prof.. apart from not being able to say "determined" and saying "de-ter-mIIIIID" instead, he's actually really helpful. He spent a few hours after class going over some notes with me and super nice!

4.0
2.0
ECON310
Dec 5, 2004

He is quite helpful when you have some questions and can even tell you how to do your assignment in dail. And you can get a quite high mark in his course. However, his lectures are somewhat boring.

3.0
2.0
COMM295
Dec 16, 2004

Super funny accent...listen to him say "maximize", "minimize", "probability"..it will crack u up...dun learn anything in his class, but a very nice guy

5.0
2.0
COMM295
Dec 19, 2004

course material was so much and hard but the exam is relatively easy THe prof explains very well so if you listen to him carefully will understand everything he is very willing to help out students and emails to students often to keep track of office hrs and grades nice one!!

4.0
3.0
ECON310
Dec 22, 2004

Altho he has this accent when he speaks, he still was able to explain the "textbook notes" clearly. I didn't like MCs being the biggest part of his mts tho. He is a nice guy, and i am willing to take 311 with him next sem.

5.0
3.0
COMM295
Dec 23, 2004

i strongly recommend him. He is always willing to help you out. A very nice guy. He offers you the best help you can get in his office hour. I liked him a lot. Reading text is important.

5.0
1.0
COMM295
Dec 23, 2004

nice prof. very responsible and tries very hard to explain everything.

1.0
5.0
ECON295
Dec 27, 2004

poor prof.

3.0
2.0
PUBLICFINANCE
Dec 29, 2004

Wouldn't recommend. I believe his poor grasp of the english language is what accounts for his poor lecture skills.

3.0
3.0
ECON310
Jan 2, 2005

Notes are clear but exams are a little bit beyond what's being taught. Generally ok.

3.0
3.0
COMM295
Jan 11, 2005

COMM 295 is basically ECON 101 all over again. His powerpoint notes are not that useful, its the same as the textbook. Memorize the textbook, and do his practice probs, you'll score near perfect. This guy gives out free answers to assignments if you just ask. Horrible English, "childish" for his age

5.0
1.0
ECON311
Jan 27, 2005

I've only been in the class for a month so far, but I have no complaints. I don't know why everyone says he can't speak English. He has an ACCENT, get over it! It's not that hard to decipher. Good prof, very clear, easy assignments!

5.0
3.0
ECON301
Mar 26, 2005

Shrestha always demonstrate his best effort in teaching, managing the course and helping students. Though he has an accent, his English is still understandable when you pay attention to what he says. Exams are very reasonable if you work hard and follow what he says in lecture! Reasonably good prof!

1.0
5.0
ECON301
Mar 30, 2005

No Comments

5.0
2.0
ECON311
Apr 8, 2005

Very organized, very clear, very helpful, very friendly. Good instructor!

5.0
2.0
ECON311
Apr 25, 2005

really boring but easy class. if you come to class and read the text will get a really high mark

2.0
5.0
ECON311
Apr 26, 2005

f***** up guy, too much. has no mercy for people..worst prof at UBC

4.0
2.0
ECON311
Apr 28, 2005

This prof is very nice. He is very patient during office hours. Minor problem is that the assignment and exam questions that he formulates can be unclear. Other than that, I would recommend this prof.

1.0
5.0
ECON311
May 4, 2005

This guy is messed up

2.0
5.0
ECOM310311
May 19, 2005

poor, bad markings and grades'

2.0
4.0
ECON102
Jun 17, 2005

No Comments

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Jul 5, 2005

his accent makes him a little hard to understand. Alot of people didn't go to class because his lecture notes were online and very close to the Text. They paid the price, alot of the assignment and exam questions are explained in lecture even though only a few people were paying attention (and his MC was taken from his website).

1.0
5.0
ECON310
Jul 5, 2005

bad!!!!!!!!!!

3.0
4.0
ECON102
Aug 4, 2005

i realised economics wasnt my thing after taking this course. but im not blaming the prof for my bad mark of course

2.0
4.0
ECON310
Nov 14, 2005

Lecture seems easy untill you hit the midterm. Midterm questions are vague and lots of students mis-interpret the meaning. Midterm marking is tough (he doesn't give much partial marks).

2.0
5.0
COMM295
Grade: B
Dec 2, 2005

difficult to understand b/c of accent, and makes no effort to ensure students understand. teaches a mathematical course with a completely theoretical approach. very willing to help in office hours/ e mail but still very difficult to understand. U know a prof isn't explaining well when u can't find anyone in class to clarify a main concept.

2.0
3.0
COMM295
Dec 6, 2005

Well... same thing as all the others have been saying. In all honesty, his effort in trying to help us understand was admirable but he just isn't cut out to explaining this stuff to people who do not know it. He's not a bad guy, just not a very good teacher.

2.0
4.0
ECON295
Dec 6, 2005

Course material actually isn't too difficult but Ratna doesn't prepare students for the material on the exam. Avoid this professor. He's a nice guy but he's too smart for his students.

2.0
4.0
295
Dec 15, 2005

I only attended the first few lectures because Ratna just uses Power-point slides to summarize the textbook, which I am fully capable of doing myself. Although I wouldn't recommend Ratna as a Prof, he is pretty helpful in office hours though, he really knows his stuff.

2.0
5.0
COMM295
Dec 15, 2005

one word: AWFUL! yes he knows his economics but does not know anything about teaching. I went to a total of 5 lectures and slept through 4. AWFUL STAY AWAY.

2.0
4.0
ECON310
Dec 29, 2005

No Comments

2.0
3.0
COMM295
Jan 6, 2006

Ratna is a good guy but doesn't seem to know too much about economics, and very little about teaching. His lectures are very uninspired, and he spends way too much time going over the easiest stuff leaving us to teach ourselves the hard stuff.

5.0
1.0
ECON310
Jan 30, 2006

This course was very easy and if you have problems understanding the material, it's not because of the prof. He's got a funny accent but no real problems understanding him as long as you pay attention, which can be hard because the class covers so little material over such a long period of time...

4.0
2.0
ECON311
Apr 30, 2006

Sort of odd, but helpful. Tried to make lectures interesting, but not very successfully. Very quick marker though, and clear during office hours, which you should definitely take advantage of.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Jul 21, 2006

I have one word to say - COFFEE. Lectures are very boring, esp. when taken in summer and are 3 hours long. By the 2nd wk, it seemed like half the class stopped showing up. His lecture notes are essentially pulled from the text and attending lectures is about equivalent to just reading the text on your own.

1.0
4.0
COMM295
Oct 20, 2006

worst prof i have had so far. his notes are right out of the text. he complicates easy concepts and confuses students durin lectures...lectures are hard to follow, since he confuses himself too. i recommend people to self-study from text and do the practice questions if you're stuck in his class.

2.0
5.0
COMM295
Nov 27, 2006

Not a good professor whatsoever. Do not recommend this teacher, I had troubles understanding his accent & founf studying at home so much more useful than going to his class. Exam is very tricky (especially multiple choice). Buy the study guide, it is the most helpful tool for this class (cuts down a lot of pointless readings).

4.0
2.0
COMM295
Dec 22, 2006

ratna is VERY helpful, if you hav a ques stuck in the assignment, u can ask him for help,he really wants his students to do well, he has a strong accent, but once you get used to it, i don't think it's a problem understanding him, i saw the post "the exam was tricky" but the exam is not written by ratna only, all sections' profs contributed togethe

4.0
1.0
ECON310
Jan 6, 2007

Nice guy, tries to make lectures fun. Lectures themselves are not crystal clear and the notes are just lifted from the textbook. Book itself is also very vague and general compared to the practice problems and exam questions. Use his office hours and go through the material on your own. the course itself is pretty easy.

4.0
2.0
ECON310
Jan 27, 2007

Dr. Shrestha is an ok prof. His notes are clear and exams are fare. He is very helpful in his office hours. I would recommend him.

3.0
4.0
ECON311
Apr 28, 2007

Mr Shrestha shouldn't have been teaching a class of 175-200. One-on-one when I saw him in the office, I learned a lot. However, in class, he went far too fast (couldn't even cut'n'paste his ppt notes to keep up with him). He'd make a good tutor, but he is not a good lecturer. The man couldn't teach a tree to grow.

4.0
4.0
ECON101
Apr 30, 2007

Ratna is easiest prof for ECON 101. Lectures are a bit fuzzy, but he's extremely helpful and patient 1 on 1. TAKE ADVANTAGE of office hours from the beginning of term, don't wait until last minute like I did. Exam questions are straight from practice q's - get help for those w/o solution. I ended up w/ 90% despite tears and near-breakdowns.

5.0
1.0
ECON101
May 10, 2007

Shrestha Ratna is believed to be another Lemche for ECON 101! Lectures are boring, but assignments are easy and the TA(Max Liu) is etxtremely helpful. Exam questions are straight from practice questions on his website. I ended up with a distinction for this course, and I believe that I can get an A+ if I work a little bit harder.Highly recommended!

3.0
2.0
ECON101
May 13, 2007

Easiest Econ 101 teacher. Often the students in the non-Comm faculties get him instead of Lemche or Gatemen. His midterms and exams are straight from his website, so study up!! :)

3.0
1.0
ECON101
Aug 28, 2007

Easy MT and final, very fast to reply on emails.. very hard to understand through his accent... voice can be hypnotizing especially on a warm sunny day..

5.0
2.0
ECON311
Mar 14, 2008

Dr.Shresta is a very nice person and a very good professor. Maybe it's because I'm in Science that I think this way, but his lectures to me are very clear and straight forward.

4.0
1.0
ECON101
Apr 18, 2008

Best econ 101/102 professor; I prefer him over Robert Gateman.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Apr 26, 2008

A very helpful prof. Willing to explain several times until you fully understand. Although initially it was hard to understand his accent, you'll get used to it. His quizzes are extremely easy, as they have no time limit. recommended

5.0
2.0
ECON102
Jun 11, 2008

Excellent prof. Clear, concise presentation of the important material.

4.0
1.0
ECON102
Jun 13, 2008

Difficult to comprehend due to his accent. Lectures rely on textbook-ripped slides and can thus be skipped. Really nice guy, will give you hints and tips on upcoming exams; exam is easy for the material tested is straightforward and relevant. However his accent put me off so much I stopped going to lectures and just studied from the book.

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Jun 14, 2008

His lecture notes are completely off of the textbook, word for word. I took the summer course, and there were only 10 quizzes, one midterm, and one final to determine our mark. The quizzes are a little tricky, since theyre online quizzes. But the stuff on his Vista site helps a lot (the Self-Assessments, and Practice Questions).

3.0
1.0
ECON101
Jul 10, 2008

Watch Lemche's Videoes on Youtube, that's Shresthra in a nutshell /w an accent

5.0
2.0
ECON471
Dec 21, 2008

AWESOME prof! VERY nice and helpful, easy class because he gives lots of review questions which are JUST like the midterm/final. he wants you to do well, best econ prof there is hands down!! take it take it!

5.0
1.0
COMM295
Jan 16, 2009

This professor seemed a bit unclear to me at first, but once I got used to his style of teaching, it was ok. What I like about him is that he makes an effort to help students understand the material. If you don't understand something or have a question, go to his office hours! I found it very helpful! Great course overall! Great professor!

3.0
2.0
COMM394
Apr 14, 2009

Cares for his students, sometimes difficult to understand, tests are fair.

4.0
2.0
COMM394
May 5, 2009

Possibly the easiest Government and Business professor you will ever find at Sauder! Easygoing, easy marker, and fair exams (final harder than midterm, beware). His marking is random, and subjective, just write down what he says in class. He doesn't even expect you to make a handout for the debate (whereas other profs do). He's funny too + strange!

5.0
1.0
ECON201
Jun 18, 2009

I like him. The lay out of the class is good. Notes are well organized and the quizes are helpful. He went alittle fast towards the end, but thats because there is so little time in the summer. Nice good.

2.0
4.0
ECON102
Jul 8, 2009

Definitely not the best. Hard to understand, heavy accent. He taught us linear graph in the first class, and towards the end of the course, we got lost. Wouldn't recommend him.

5.0
1.0
ECON102
Aug 4, 2009

He is very clear on teaching. Easy to understand, go to class and pay attention. I got A+, you will too, because the exam is so easy. Definitely recommend him.

5.0
3.0
ECON310
Dec 7, 2009

His lectures are very good... if you sit in the front of the lecture hall. He doesn't move and only stays in front of the class. Has a bit of an accent so you must listen carefully. Very helpful outside of class. Exams are not difficult but are worth a lot which kind of throws you off. Each MC question is worth like 4% of your overall grade.

4.0
1.0
COMM295
Dec 17, 2009

He's really helpful during office hours...nice guy. Provided ALOT of practice questions and sample past midterms and finals!

5.0
2.0
ECON471
Dec 22, 2009

Super patient, very helpful prof. Midterm was pretty easy, but final was long... He applies a lot of econ 301 concepts and solidifies a lot of economic principles with this course...

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Mar 18, 2010

The midterm average was very low and was even scaled up. I think people just weren't doing the problem sets and review questions as his exam questions are just variations of them. Sometimes goes on to ramble about particular subjects but otherwise relatively straightforward. Pay attention in class and do the problem sets and you'll get an A.

2.0
5.0
ECON311
Apr 8, 2010

Difficult to understand with his heavy accent. It's better to go through the notes before class. Otherwise, don't even bother going. Did poorly on the midterm because I studied the textbook and textbook study guide (since his notes were from textbook). Do NOT do this. Use HIS notes and HIS practice questions. Then you'll do fine.

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Apr 16, 2010

Worst teacher I had so far. All he does is read the slides provided to him by the editor of the textbook. Really boring and he has a heavy Indian accent. The funny thing is that he cannot even pronounce the word "economy" properly. When I came to ask him a couple of questions, he made me felt as if I was disturbing him...

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Apr 25, 2010

Mediocre in general. Not a hard class provided you review and do the practice questions, but doesn't exactly entice interest or enthuthiasm in the subject. At the very least, a very straightforward and to the point lecturing style. Some may be turned off by the heavy Indian/Nepalese accent but I didn't find it much of a bother at all.

2.0
4.0
ECON101
May 12, 2010

I found that I had to really focus on what he was trying to say. He has horrendous grammar and a very heavy accent. The material in the text is REALLY easy but I felt like he tried to trick the class when it came to the material. 75% of my class got a C or under on the MT. As a heads up: the practice problems--do them. They show up, verbatim.

4.0
1.0
ECON471
Jun 15, 2010

Very easy course. Must take it !!

4.0
1.0
ECON471
Jun 22, 2010

Should be the easiest among all the 400's econs. Make sure you understand all the materials in practices & go find him during office hours. He was so helpful that even when many students went to the office hours, he didn't hesitate to provide complete and even more in-depth answers to single one of us. Very nice for him & the TA. Very good course.

4.0
2.0
ECON471
Jun 23, 2010

Majority of the learning needed for the exams happened during office hours. Real learning happpens when you do the practice problems, not during the lectures. If you want to do well, go to him and ask how to get full marks on practice questions. Do it even if he doesn't seem like he wants to be there lol.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Jul 9, 2010

so awesome very helpful

1.0
2.0
MICROECON
Jul 12, 2010

This class teaches you nothing. He has his favourites-hopefully you're one of them. His accent is not hard to understand, but what he says is. He jumps all over the place. Micro's easy, but he doesn't actually test you on the material (stupidly simple exam Qs.) DON'T study the too much - it will hurt you. memorize defn. and MCQ and you'll be fine.

1.0
4.0
MACROECON
Jul 12, 2010

His Macro class is a lot more difficult than his Micro class. His accent is fine to understand, but he jumps all over the place. Compared to his Micro class you need to study. Personally, I loved that we had to actually do math and models. His exams are much more fair in Macro than Micro. He actually tests what you've learned, not just definitions.

1.0
3.0
ECON101
Jul 14, 2010

Terrible professor, DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS. I could read the textbook by myself at home and I would learn more, because that's exactly strictly what he does, except in a disorganized way with his annoying Indian accent. Lazy prof that only uses the material provided by the textbook. Made me hate economy.

1.0
5.0
COMM295
Oct 18, 2010

Clearly has no interest in teaching, puts 0 effort into his lessons. His notes are all over the place, and he skips slides 3 at a time. Can't even distribute marked assignments efficiently. Attendance at lectures does not help at all on assignments. Reflects poorly on the faculty of Sauder... he should just stick to doing research.

1.0
3.0
ECON310
Oct 22, 2010

The worst. If you have any interest in actually learning econ, take from a different prof. Disorganized, incomprehensible, boring, annoying lecturer. ("Can you see that?")

3.0
4.0
COMM295
Oct 26, 2010

I know he wants to help and he has the passion in teaching, but he has no techniques at all. Especially he doesnt know how to teach large size class! If you are not sitting in the middle of the first row, you'll never understand what he's talking about. Now, I feel like I learnt nothing in class&the MT's giving me so much pressure.It worths a lot!

5.0
1.0
ECON471
Dec 30, 2010

Although I am an Econ student but I am not good at Economics. This is the easiest Economics class Ive taken, I think its easier than the 2**,3** Econ classes. Didnt use any textbook and study any of his printed notes. Just simply study the notes taken in class and do all the past materials and you can get an A. No surprises in midterms/finals!

1.0
5.0
COMM295
Jan 4, 2011

Worst econ prof i've ever had. Could not understand a word he was saying. Jumped around during the lecture, office hours were useless. Go to another prof's section if you can.

4.0
2.0
ECON320
Feb 13, 2011

I can see why some people may have been annoyed by the way he jumped all over topics during the course, but I found him to be very fair and willing to help. He returned emails usually within 2 hours of you sending questions and made every effort to make sure students had practice questions and quizzes they needed to be equipped for the exam.

4.0
2.0
ECON295
Mar 9, 2011

He is not a bad prof as others may say. If you give your 100% concentration in class, you will definitely learn A LOT from him compared to other profs. Whenever you lose concentration for a few minutes there is a good possibility that you won't understand what he is saying for a good part of the lecture.

2.0
5.0
ECON101
Jun 21, 2011

Hard to understand! Requires every ounce of focus and more. Homework is uselessly easy. Midterm is Hard and Final is hard. Only grades counted, besides 1 or 2 marks for attendance. READ ALL THE BOOK IF YOU TAKE THIS CLASS. Besides all of his powerpoints are direct quotes from the book, 50 slides for 1 chapter, for 1 class session in 50 minutes.

2.0
3.0
ECON101
Jul 6, 2011

Awful, awful, awful teacher. Incomprehensible, he can't even pronounce "economy"...its the subject he's TEACHING. His examples are stale and he uses up class time on parts of the course which are easy, when he should be using the time on the complicated parts. Just useless. UBC knows hes bad too...hence why he only teaches 1 course/year. Stay away!

2.0
1.0
ECON310
Jul 18, 2011

Nice guy, but I cannot recommend him. I initially tried to get on board with his teaching style and ended up failing the midterm, so I taught myself from the textbook and got an A+ on the final. If you're counting on the caliber of your teacher, stay away. If you are capable of teaching yourself, his tests are pretty easy, so go for it!

2.0
4.0
ECON102
Jul 18, 2011

He's one of those profs that makes learning simple material harder rather than easier. I'd be willing to guess that he's worth sticking with in higher levels (he seems to be a total economic whiz) but really a bad fit for teaching 100 level.

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Aug 23, 2011

He is a nice prof.But he teaches simple stuff, some of which are just drown out from the textbook. His exam is easy, as long as you study hard, you will do well. if you are looking for good grades, go for it.

2.0
5.0
COMM295
Sep 18, 2011

He couldn't explain his own powerpoint notes properly, it's actually kind of funny. He misleads the correct slides, and teaches his incorrect slides matter-of-factly. He responds to student comments or questions as if they were irrelevant, quickly droning on about something else. Even Lemche had a connection with students. Watch the accent.

2.0
3.0
COMM109
Sep 20, 2011

Terrible. Hard to understand, the notes are old and written in Comic Sans.

1.0
5.0
ECON102
Jan 26, 2012

Easily among the worst lecturers at UBC. Entirely incomprehensible due to to his accent, wastes time reviewing easy concepts but doesn't cover key course content, assumes students automatically understand everything ("can you see that?"), then is patronizing because he assumes everyone's incompetent. Unclear how he he could ever have been hired.

5.0
3.0
ECON101
Mar 17, 2012

I think professor Shrestha is a pretty good professor. He gives great examples in his lectures and you can tell he is generally enthusiastic about this subject. His accent is really not that bad, contrary to what others have said. He is very helpful and willing to stay behind after lectures to help you with your problems too.

5.0
1.0
ECON101
May 4, 2012

One of the best lecturers I've had at UBC. I am not sure if simply the lecture content was easy, or his teaching ability was awesome, but nonetheless, I learned a lot swiftly and easily from his course. And the assignments were just awesome. I don't think anybody could fail this after doing the assignments.

4.0
1.0
ECON101
May 4, 2012

Shrestha is a breeze compared to Gateman. Course is taken entirely from the textbook so read it, sit near the front so you can understand what he's saying and it shouldn't be any trouble.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
May 18, 2012

Good prof

4.0
2.0
COMM394
Jun 11, 2012

Pretty easy class compared to other 394 profs. Exams are easy as long as you attend his lectures

4.0
4.0
ECON471
Jun 15, 2012

Great prof, funny too. Really tried his best to prepare us for the exams. Went a little fast at the end but only because he wanted to devote an entire class to doing practice questions which was more helpful anyways. Exams were hard but fair. This is also probably one of the easier Econ courses. No textbook required.

5.0
1.0
COM394
Jul 17, 2012

great prof

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Aug 17, 2012

Based on my experience, its best to just read over the book carefully, do his practice problem posted online, go to discussion, and do aplia. His lectures are useless. He goes over slides too fast, gives horrible diagrams when drawing, explain things unclearly, and have an accent that is hard to comprehend.

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Oct 29, 2012

He is a great prof, but his midterm was way to easy. For me sometimes easy questions take longer to think because it is all theory..He gave out hints too...just too good to be a prof haha

2.0
1.0
ECON101
Nov 3, 2012

Yup, that midterm was FAR too easy. I've skipped literally half the classes, they're completely useless, all I did was read the textbook and that gets you near 100% on his online assignments worth 20% of the grade. His midterm was a mirror of the online questions. Hope the final is this easy too (likely).

1.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 4, 2012

The quality of his lectures is not so much sub-standard as it is unacceptable and incomprehensible. He's probably one of the easiest Econ 101/102 profs in that simply reading the text will ensure, with a good micro/macro-economic understanding, a high grade, but his totally objective-subjective grading and inability to manage a class are ridiculous

2.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 7, 2012

His accent really isn't that bad once you stop going to class.

3.0
2.0
COMM295
Dec 2, 2012

Yes, he's boring during lectures. The accent might also be sometimes hard to understand. But for the class that I took, fantastic slides. It pretty much covered course content since barely listen to him/read the textbook anyways. And if you're taking another class of his that's not coordinated, expect very easy midterms and lenient marking. =)

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Dec 27, 2012

Quite knowledgeable in material and a nice prof. He's helpful if you go to his office hours. Hilariously low student interaction during lectures though. Beats material to death; you'll do fine in his simple final and midterm exams as long as you're awake half the time.

1.0
1.0
ECON102
Jan 7, 2013

He's kind of a negative externality to society. His classes are easy, but there are still better GPA boosters available. And given that he doesn't teach, there's no point in taking his class if you want to learn a thing about macroeconomics. Unless you want to hear a funny pronunciation of economy, just avoid his class.

3.0
3.0
ECON102
May 23, 2013

In the end of the term my enthusiastic about econ was gone. Although he is quiet helpful when you asking question, his lectures are so boring. All you need to do is reading the textbook and do the practice question online.

5.0
1.0
COMM394
Jun 28, 2013

Excellent professor and easy class if you do the readings and practice questions - his exams (all short answer) will be similar to the questions. The class is interesting & attendance is required. The debate structure is a bit loose but he marks you easy (class got between 80 and 90 on it). Go with him! Other profs for this class are more work

5.0
2.0
ECON295
Jul 11, 2013

Prof Shrestha is way underrated on this website (ratemyprof)! He's actually an extremely knowledgeable, helpful, clear, and friendly professor. His slides are crystal clear, no need to even read the textbook because you'll just confuse yourself, and you can tell that he genuinely wants his students to do well. Shrestha can TEACH! :)

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Aug 9, 2013

He's not terrible. Goes through material methodologically but you can easily succeed by reading textbook and doing aplia questions. midterm was on the easy side. bonus 1% for attending lectures but tutorials aren't mandatory.

4.0
1.0
ECON101
Aug 15, 2013

He's a good guy! Sure he has an accent (easy to get used to) but he teaches the material effectively. If you pay attention during lecture and actually put an effort into doing your Aplia then I don't see how you can't get an A! I recommend taking it with him. He knows the material well.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Aug 23, 2013

Great prof! 100% recommend him! Absolutely perfect in teaching and fair on exams.

5.0
1.0
ECON311
Sep 23, 2013

Great prof.

3.0
2.0
COMM295
Sep 29, 2013

I understand that economics is dry and hard to make interesting, but I wonder if he even tries. I didn't mind too much in the end, though, because his slides are very good and studying them will get you a good grade. That sharp, phlegm-inhaling noise he makes every now and then is pretty gross, though. Study his slides! They're a goldmine!

4.0
1.0
ECON101
Oct 16, 2013

good prof ! willing to stay after lecture to explain midterm questions clearly if you dont understand

4.0
5.0
ECON101
Oct 26, 2013

Hard Midterm :(( Goes over simple questions in class and hard questions show up on the midterm.

3.0
3.0
ECON310
Nov 1, 2013

RAIGHT, can you see that, and connect psi. Youll get it once you take his class.

4.0
3.0
ECON471
Grade: A
Nov 22, 2013

He knows his stuff and his midterms are fair. There were some interesting lectures, but you don't really learn anything new if you've taken economics before. You are just applying the same formulas to different concepts.

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Nov 24, 2013

Really boring. I just learned everything out of the textbook and read Game of Thrones in class. Still did pretty well.

2.0
3.0
ECON471
Dec 19, 2013

Clearly he seems to favour COMMERCE students way more. His midterms are fair and easy but his final was extremely challenging (content and length wise). So becareful on the final....

4.0
5.0
ECON101
Dec 23, 2013

The final was way toooo hard!! This course was a gpa destroyer! In class he only talks about concepts and he does not do any examples.

5.0
2.0
ECON310
Dec 28, 2013

Nice guy. Knows what he is talking about. His class is very clear and he is helpful in office hours.

4.0
3.0
ECON101
Jan 7, 2014

Midterm was fair, but final was much harder in comparison. Make sure you follow the textbook, lecture notes and do practice questions to thoroughly learn the material for the final. He throws in some tough questions.

1.0
5.0
ECON101
Jan 15, 2014

Dr. Shresta clearly cannot teach! Avoid at all costs! Seems like an easy prof but you are in a surprise for the final. Raighhht

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Feb 24, 2014

Good prof. easy midterm. Clear notes and explanations

1.0
3.0
ECON102
Apr 30, 2014

Worst prof at ubc. avoid at all costs.

5.0
2.0
ECON311
May 1, 2014

Great Prof. Took both Econ 310/311 with him and learned a lot. All his exams are fair and he is a great prof. Highly recommended.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
May 13, 2014

Great and nice professor. Always willing to help. When he said he would exam us things taught in class but not in the text book, he meant it. There were about 2 questions like that worth 8 marks, so better attend his class:) didn't spend so much time prepare for the final. Desfinetely a GPA booster.

5.0
2.0
ECON471
Jun 30, 2014

He is a very helpful teacher, he tries his best to let students understand the very basic and core of economics. He is very clear most of the time, although when he explains with graphs, it can get very messy. Overall I recommend him.

4.0
1.0
ECON101
Grade: A+
Jul 22, 2014

Easiest prof ever, some people do well because later on is just math. I'm skipping other parts of the exams, because that's too simple. Math is where separate the majority from Ace students.

4.0
3.0
ECON101
Aug 16, 2014

He's honestly not that bad. He tries really hard to help his students understand. (Although sometimes, his explanations can get a little confusing. But his TAs are usually pretty good so make sure to go to tutorials) Exams are fair and only test you on the material covered in class. Quirky and funny too sometimes. I enjoyed taking econ with him!

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: B+
Aug 28, 2014

I liked him as a professor. Sometimes he was a little unclear, but the discussions helped a lot. He teaches the material thoroughly and more importantly he actually wants his students to do well. Study your practice questions go over lecture material and you will do well. Kind, has a keen interest in econ & can be funny at times! Would recommend.

3.0
4.0
ECON101
Sep 11, 2014

Kind, genuine and awesome guy, yet his lectures are very dry and boring. His explanations are not clear and his final exam was not easy. Would not recommend.

1.0
4.0
ECON101
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 15, 2014

Don't even know what he's doing everyday

1.0
4.0
COMM295
Oct 17, 2014

Literally the most unhelpful professor I have ever had. If you ask questions in class he will tell you that your question is "very simple", no matter what it is, and not answer it. So terrible

2.0
4.0
COMM295
Oct 20, 2014

Super unhelpful when answering questions. Makes some funny jokes sometimes but overall lectures were a complete bore. There are better economics professors out there.

5.0
1.0
ECON101
Nov 14, 2014

he looks like a turtle and has an indian accent, so there u go. BAM 100% best prof EVER! you'll get used to his accent tho. and he also uses "potatoes" a lot in his supply and demand examples LOL. so helpful and prepares u really well for his exams. make sure you read the textbook and go to every lecture!

1.0
4.0
ECON310
Dec 12, 2014

Avoid this professor. I am in my third year at UBC and this is by far my least favourite course. The prof struggles with explaining basic concepts. Sometimes his english doesn't make sense. Also, he makes you pay $60 for an online quiz thing, which did not help me that much (personally).

4.0
1.0
ECON101102
Grade: A
Mar 1, 2015

He got me interested in ECON. Last term ECON was my highest mark because I honestly was just so fascinated by the topic and kept on wanting to learn more. Here's a tip: For ECON 101 and 102 GO TO THE CLASSES before the midterm and the final because he will go over possible questions that might be on the exam. Overall very good prof. (POTATOES!)

3.0
4.0
COMM394
Apr 25, 2015

Overall a nice guy but ok teacher. Lecture is pretty dry and some things are pretty confusing. Lecture slides are very clear and have all the info to catch up. Debates are graded very fairly. Approachable and helpful in office hours. Good instructor choice for the course.

2.0
4.0
102
Apr 30, 2015

honestly, why does everyone say he's easy... taking econ 102 with him will murder your gpa. rather take it with gateman. at least he scales. finals had like, 12 graphs... not that easy.

5.0
2.0
ECON102
Sep 29, 2015

He's a very caring teacher and I truly appreciate his time helping students after class.

3.0
4.0
ECON101
Dec 7, 2015

Skips through 2/3 of the slides he made, always in hurry explaining stuff, always runs out of time. No answer keys provided for practice problems, which is really inconvenient because the office hours are crowded.

3.0
3.0
ECON101
Dec 10, 2015

He is not a bad professor overall. I just do not like the fact that instead of explicit answers, he gives hints in his answer keys which I do not like. He encourages all students to understand instead of memorize. Do not be tricked because he does not emphasize on math part but the tests do include a bunch of math.

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A-
Dec 11, 2015

Super dry and boring professor. Reads off slides that are just copy and pasted from textbook. Also, he gives practice exams but does not provide an answer key which makes the practice exam completely useless. Just read the textbook and you'll do fine.

3.0
3.0
COMM295
Dec 17, 2015

I like Ratna. Honestly had no idea what he was saying during a lot of the classes but the slides are really clear. I found that I barely had to read the text book and received higher grades than I expected. The assignments were great learning tools. The practice exams prepared me well for the midterm and final. Back to basics is important for him!

3.0
4.0
ECON101
Dec 18, 2015

Boring lectures, it is very easy to fall asleep. But he is a nice guy, so if you go for office hours, he is there to help you. I wish he provided answers for practice midterms, because what is the point of practicing when you don't have answers?

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: B-
Dec 24, 2015

He has a very hard accent, but his tests were super easy. Lectures are boring, but better come, because he uses material for Midterm and Final. He also uses homework quizzes for midterms and finals. Homework quizzes are easy, but you need a book to do them. He gives extra 1% for attendance(checks twice)

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Jan 10, 2016

Typical first year class. Uninspiring, same old slides, same old lecture, fairly tough tests.

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Feb 5, 2016

I would call him the "PPT reader"... He literally read through the material. You could find every material on the CONNECT. There are no reasons for you to go to his class. (he doesn't take attendance

3.0
2.0
ECON311
Grade: A-
May 2, 2016

You don't have to go to class- he reads off his slides. However, he takes attendance twice (in the last three weeks of the term) and gives +1% if you attend both times. The actual midterm and final are a lot harder than the practice ones he gives. The material is really easy, though: I taught myself from the textbook and got an 84 overall.

4.0
3.0
ECON102
May 12, 2016

Final was much harder than the midterm but still not that bad. I enjoyed his lectures and attendance did not matter.

5.0
1.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
May 17, 2016

Senpai never noticed me in class. (cry face) I loved him...

3.0
4.0
ECON102
Grade: A-
Aug 3, 2016
Wouldn't take again

I cannot understand why he set the difficulty of final like super hard wich he said was similar as midterm. i think midterm was quite easy( i got 90)and the avg was 63 . The avg of final is 68 and i think this result must be curved up.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A+
Aug 25, 2016
Would take again

Why this man has anything less than a 4.5/ confuses me. He has a) Clear and organized lecture slides, b) EASY exams, c) lots of practice material that are relevant to the exam. What can you ask for more? His practice questions/practice finals don't have complete solutions on them so make sure you go to office hours or discussions if you are unsure.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
ECON101
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 3, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Strong accent, does not seem to be encouraging (when a student answers his question, most of the time he only says okay instead of saying sth. like nice try...) His exam is okay but it is kinda hard if you compare it to homework (I mean aplia questions). Not a strict prof though.

1.0
3.0
ECON101
Grade: D+
Dec 5, 2016
Wouldn't take again

I couldn't understand a single thing he said, very thick accent. Nice guy but brutally boring lectures, reads off notes, doesn't give good instructions at all or make subjects clear or interesting. I wouldn't take his class again.

Participation matters
3.0
3.0
ECON101
Dec 19, 2016
Would take again

The lectures were pretty hard to understand sometimes, and the Aplia quizzes basically ensure you read the textbook. I learned pretty much everything from the textbook. He seems like he genuinely cares about the course and he seems pretty light-hearted. Tries to get the class involved. Accent is a little hard sometimes, but isn't that Vancouver??

Clear grading criteria
Caring
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
ECON310
Grade: A-
Dec 22, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Ratna is not a good instructor. He reads straight from the slides and whenever people ask questions he can't explain things very well. He also doesn't include solutions to most of his practice questions which is baffling to me. You'll be spending most of your time just reading the text or googling concepts. At least his tests are straightforward

Get ready to read
2.0
3.0
ECON101
Grade: C
Dec 24, 2016
Wouldn't take again

His accent is hard. He will literally spend half a class waiting for one answer, even if no one understands the question. Half of your grade is based on the final. Don't take him.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
3.0
1.0
ECON311
Grade: A+
Dec 26, 2016
Would take again

He is a mediocre instructor but the course was really easy. Managed to get a 96 with less than 15 hours of studying towards both the midterm and final combined. IMO it's not worth going to lecture since his explanations make things more confusing. Just read the slides at home and do the practice problems and exams he gives you.

3.0
4.0
ECON102
Grade: C+
Dec 31, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Shrestha explained concepts well, but he went through the material in class really fast. There were quizzes online every Saturday, they were pretty easy. The midterm and final were both really hard and especially the final. He gives out review questions and sample finals, but doesn't give us the answers for them. He was always happy to explain more

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
2.0
1.0
ECON311
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Hey, it me again the 15 hour guy from 310. Well, this time I only studied for 6 hours for the 311 final and it was the easiest exam I have ever written in my life just like high school. Will probably A+ it again make sure not to go to class because his lecture is useless just read and study the slides easy 90 the course is a joke seriously.

1.0
5.0
ECON102
Grade: B-
May 16, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Hated this course with an undying passion. Shrestha's lectures are not engaging in any way shape or form. Any questions you ask will usually be used to make you look inferior. His exam and midterms are not easy and when you barely have the motivation to pay attention to his dry lectures, its a recipe for disaster.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
2.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A
May 16, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Exams are NOT easy but NOT hard. Difficulty level is pretty average. Study and you can do well Went to a couple lectures, they were very dry and boring. Attending lectures/tutorials is useless. However go to the TA review sessions.. They are very useful.

4.0
3.0
ECON101102
Grade: A-
Jun 1, 2017
Would take again

Honestly, never went to his classes His lecture slides are strait from the textbook, and he posts them online. Do the Weekly online quizzes which are easy. Finals are quite hard but I think he scales it up

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
3.0
COMM295
Jun 6, 2017
Wouldn't take again

I really disliked him for the first 3 classes, but after a while, i realised it was me who was against listening to him in class. Once you get to know him, he is extremely helpful. Ask for more clicker questions. (They're better than his in-class questions.) Pronounces capacity as "kappa city." Other than that, generally positive and caring prof.

2.0
1.0
ECON101
Grade: A+
Jun 26, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Do you enjoy economics, want to take it seriously and are thinking about pursuing it down the road? Then never take a course with Ratna. He is not a good professor in any way. People like him because you can pass just by reading the slides that HE TOOK FROM OTHER PROFESSORS. Don't go to class, don't bother going to office hours and expect nothing.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
3.0
ECON471
Grade: B
Jul 5, 2017
Would take again

Go to class since he goes over some problem sets. If you can do the practice problems you'll do well (midterm was the exact same format). Final exam was really short on time and a lot harder than the midterm.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: A
Nov 24, 2017
Would take again

Very clear lectures and cares about the student's success

Gives good feedback
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A
Nov 24, 2017
Would take again

Overall, easy A He explains really well and in depth

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A
Nov 26, 2017
Would take again

Clarity in teaching

Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: A
Nov 26, 2017
Would take again

Course is challenging but he's a good teacher

Skip class? You won't pass.
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2017
Would take again

Easy A if you read the textbook, so you do not even have to go to lectures. Mark is based off of homework, clicker quizzes, 1 midterm, and a final. If you do not do well on the midterm, he makes it so the final is worth more, which is nice. As long as you do the homework, you will be fine. Would take again.

Get ready to read
Tests? Not many
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A-
Dec 17, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Lectures are not very exciting and engaging so it definitely helps to read the textbook and ppt slides. Exam heavy so prepare to study. Also beware of random attendance checks for bonus marks.

Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
1.0
5.0
ECON101
Dec 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Hardest class I've ever taken. Boring, difficult to understand. A lot of people fail. Not intriguing or interesting.

TEST HEAVY
Tests are tough
1.0
5.0
COMM295
Dec 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Horrible class with a horrible professor. Some students had a hard time understanding him that's not even the reason why he's such a horrible professor. He obviously doesn't care about the class or about the students. Class attendance was low. His lectures were boring and he just read off the slides anyways. Take any other professor.

5.0
2.0
ECON311
Apr 5, 2018
Would take again

HE is the mastermind of the economy. I enjoyed his lectures and his brilliant mind. He may have a bit of an accent but that is nothing compared to what you learn and achieve in his class. Just attend his lectures and automatically gain phenomenal experience for your future financial life.

Gives good feedback
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
ECON101102
Grade: A-
Apr 9, 2018
Would take again

This class is extremely straightforward. Weekly online quizzes, 1 midterm, and 1 final. The lectures aren't terribly unique or interesting, but Ratna gets the job done and is good at including real-life examples and making the class applicable to life. Tests are a bit difficult, but I enjoyed the course overall.

Tough Grader
Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
4.0
ECON102
Apr 14, 2018
Would take again

He's okay... Not the best, not the worst... I haven't heard of one *amazing* econ prof at UBC. We had weekly quizzes which weren't super difficult, but time-consuming as they were due online on Saturday's. Content is a bit difficult, so take notes (even though he says he "doesn't allow it"... Lots of kids still take notes, and I sure wish I had!)

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
5.0
1.0
ECON101102
Grade: A+
Apr 23, 2018
Would take again

Awesome prof. Took 101 and 102 with him and received A+ for both. Exams were easy and fair, similar to the practice questions he gives. Just pay attention in class and you'll do well. If you're wanting to take 101 and 102, take it with him.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
2.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
Apr 28, 2018
Would take again

Even though he might have an accent, he's an amazing prof and easily understandable. I'd definitely recommend him for econ 102. Fair exam and if you study well, it's easy to get an A

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Apr 28, 2018
Would take again

Took his class in summer. It was definitely worth it to take his class. 10/10 would recommend his class.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
1.0
5.0
ECON311
Apr 30, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Classes are terribly boring and there is no reason to attend other than for the iClicker participation marks. Be prepared to spend way more time on ECON than your other classes with the mandatory weekly 60-80 minute online exams. Memorize the graphs for the final exam.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
2.0
4.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
May 9, 2018
Would take again

As long as you show up to class for the clicker marks (lectures were not helpful) and keep up with the textbook and do the weekly online quizzes, its an easy A course. The hardest thing about this course is staying awake through his lectures.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
2.0
COMM295
Grade: A+
May 19, 2018
Would take again

Not a bad professor for 295. Gets through the material, lecture is pretty dry. Read the textbook, attend class for the Clickers, do the practice exams, and you should do fine. Nice guy outside of class.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
Jun 26, 2018
Would take again

He is awesome. I should also take my econ 101 with him. Easy to get A. Every week a quiz on MyEconlab, sometimes that is time-consuming. You can learn by yourself but go to class for i-cliker credits. By the way, the i-cliker questions sometimes will show on the midterms and finals.

2.0
4.0
ECON101
Aug 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This class is dry to begin with, but the professor is not a great lecturer and does not make it any more interesting. This class couls be connected to real world examples and be more engaging, and it is a relevant and interesting topic- if taught right. This professor uses too many graphs with abstract and arbitrary explanations that are confusing.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
2.0
1.0
ECON101
Sep 10, 2018
Would take again

Jumps around a lot. As long as u took high school economics, it's easy to follow the course. However, if u don't some of the terms might be difficult for u to understand as he jumps around a lot.

1.0
5.0
ECON295
Sep 28, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Terrible lecturer. Tells you "not to search for answers" to practice questions and to simply "understand the concept". Jumps around, expecting you to have learned from previous classes. Chose THE ABSOLUTE WORST textbook to teach from (Managerial Economics and Strategy by Perloff)(look at its Amazon reviews).

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
ECON101
Oct 21, 2018
Wouldn't take again

If I want hard exams, I would take this course with Gateman who appears to be a better lecturer. Btw, I only come to the last 30 mins of his class because that's when you actually learn anything for his i-clicker questions.

1.0
5.0
ECON101
Oct 26, 2018
Wouldn't take again

His office hour is as confusing as his lectures. Does not provide any actual help, and a lot of guys just showed up to watch LOL semi finals..... I only go to his lectures for i-clicker questions.

1.0
5.0
ECON101
Oct 27, 2018
Wouldn't take again

His lectures are so confusing and loosely explained. People literally ignore him all the time. The book he chose is so not detailed enough to cover exam materials.

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A+
Nov 28, 2018
Would take again

Ratna was an okay prof. Make sure to read before class. I took his ECON101 class 2 summers ago. I did a lot of reading on my own and watching youtube videos. hes a nice guy, the curse isn't hard, just pre read and show up to class and everything will make sense. 90% with reasonable effort

Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
2.0
4.0
ECON310
Grade: B-
Dec 20, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Not the worst prof to take econ with, but definitely not the best. Very boring lectures, but he uses i-clickers some classes, so there are lost marks for skipping. Exams aren't the easiest, but he does weight the final heavier if you did better on it than the midterm. Definitely more of a math/stats oriented prof compared to others.

Participation matters
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
ECON101
Grade: A-
Dec 23, 2018
Would take again

Very nice professor, easy A if you do the weekly quizzes.

Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
3.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A
Dec 28, 2018
Would take again

Enjoyed his classes. He had fair exam and putting in the decent amount of effort should secure an A for the class. Do pre-readings before the class to complement his lectures.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
4.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A
Jan 1, 2019
Would take again

Tons of students were very unsatisfied with his teaching style as he can come across bland in lectures. This is a total misrepresentation of Ratna. Go to his office hours if something doesn't make sense, he won't let you leave the room until you understand the concepts. Tough course, but Ratna made the experience worth while!

Respected
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Caring
4.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Jan 4, 2019
Would take again

Ratna is a decent lecturer but sometimes parts of his explanations can be a bit unclear. His classes were enjoyable and exams were fair.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A+
Jan 17, 2019
Would take again

I really enjoyed Ratna's classes. During the midterm season I would go to office hours and he was very nice and willing to help. His mid term was harder than the final in my opinion. The good thing about his class is that if you mess up your middy he weighs your final at 80%. Studying from the slides and doing all his problems will get an A.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A-
Mar 15, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Cannot control his classrooms at all, so tons of people are talking while he is talking and he does nothing about it. Any material covered in class is completely covered in the textbook, so no point in going except for clicker marks. He is a very poor communicator (eg. he didn't tell us his expectations for graphs for our midterm AFTER THE MIDTERM)

Participation matters
1.0
4.0
ECON102
Apr 15, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Weekly at home quizzes cover material only from the textbook and not from the actual lectures, but textbook doesn't cover what is on the midterm and the final, not to mention the final covers some material covered nowhere! This makes no sense as I felt I was learning a different course in the book than I was from being in lectures. A disconnect!

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ECON311
Apr 16, 2019
Wouldn't take again

felt like there was a glass wall between him and the rest of the class all semester. does he know he's teaching an intro level course to 300 kids? or does he think he's just entertaining himself with his own intelligence? you could study until your head fell off and you'd still get a bad grade b/c the course material barely even covers exam content

Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ECON311
Apr 17, 2019
Wouldn't take again

wish i could give ratna a negative rating -- 1 is too generous. not only is he incapable of teaching whatsoever, he is also incapable of writing fair exams (so even though i essentially taught MYSELF this course, i still couldn't do well). he thinks it's funny to include trick questions and can't word a decent question to save his life. AVOID HIM!

Tough grader
4.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A-
Apr 18, 2019
Would take again

I went into COMM295 expecting to be absolutely screwed. He goes all over the place so be sure to have a quick glance at the notes before so you can scribble down examples during class and know what youre doing. The exams were pretty fair. He was not as bad as I thought!

4.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
Apr 30, 2019
Would take again

Lectures could be boring at times. The midterm was very easy. In comparison, I found the final quite difficult. However, my overall grade was fine somehow. I'd say it's pretty easy to do well. I didn't have to study too much and there's easy marks from weekly quizzes and iclicker. Ratna has clear and concise slides that you can study from.

Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
COMM295
Jul 1, 2019
Would take again

He's a really great prof, concise and to the point. The exams are standardized, so they were fair and he really cares about all his students!

Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
COMM295
Jul 3, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He can't teach. But he gives past papers so it's aight.

2.0
3.0
ECON101
Aug 6, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Took the class as a requirement after IB. Only went to class for the iclicker grades. His lectures are pretty boring and I couldn't understand him a lot of the time. He's just a bit too serious and straight-forward in a class that already has boring content.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
1.0
4.0
ECON101
Grade: Incomplete
Nov 27, 2019
Wouldn't take again

would absolutely not recommend. I never took economics before, and I find it difficult to understand most of the concepts because he goes through it EXTREMELY quick. I also barely used his online textbook (100$ btw), and the online quizzes material are barely covered in class. half of the class is not following, or they don't even show up.

Graded by few things
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: B
Nov 29, 2019
Would take again

He is a very good prof. He is very good at explaining concepts thoroughly. The content is sometimes boring so its hard to always pay attention to lectures but if you do, you will do very good in this course. Take advantage of office hours, the tutoring sessions aren't the best but if you follow the class and do the assignments you're gonna be ok.

Respected
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
2.0
COMM295
Nov 29, 2019
Would take again

I was rly scared going into the class cause of what I heard about him/based on his score. After taking his class I don't understand what all the fuss was about. He's a very caring prof and understands that the importance isn't in the specifics but rather the bigger picture. The class overlapped alot w my psych course and i found it very interesting

Respected
Participation matters
Caring
4.0
2.0
ECON310
Jan 5, 2020
Would take again

His lectures are very straight-forward, and his exams are closely related to his ppt/ hw/ practice questions. You will do well on the exam as long as you do hw (the hw isn't very hard).

Clear grading criteria
1.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: B
Jan 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

worst prof ever. his lectures are so boring and dull. literally felt like sleeping throughout. DONT DO IT!!!!

1.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Wow... do NOT take this mans class. Had he is absolutely horrific at explaining the concepts of the class. He repeatedly contradicts what he says on his lecture slides. He is also a very dull lecturer, half the time people get up and leave after iclickr because they are so bored of hearing him talk. Had gatemen last term and he was 1000x better;(((

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The 120 minute weekly online quizzes cover none of the content in his lectures... Literally take any other profs class...

3.0
4.0
ECON101
Grade: B+
Mar 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Easy enough course. Not anything special. Don't really need to pay attention in class... Just do the mylabs and study the slides and you should be fine. Lectures didn't give any real value... nothing to complain about... nothing to rave about...

Test heavy
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A
Mar 18, 2020
Would take again

Ratna was a nice prof! Accessible and caring about his students, his lectures were interesting and I learnt a lot of economics from him. Great prof overall!

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Caring
2.0
3.0
ECON311
Apr 12, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Dull lectures

Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
4.0
4.0
ECON102
Apr 26, 2020
Would take again

Super nice prof, easy going ,and does his best to accommodate for his students! Super helpful and wants students to succeed by providing them with practice midterms and a mock final! Read the textbook, do mylab practice questions, and attend his class because he does iClicker questions. Lectures are dry, but easy pass if you put in the work!

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
ECON102
Grade: A-
Apr 30, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Hard exam

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
Apr 30, 2020
Would take again

Can be confusing at times, but if you read the textbook and his slides, you should do just fine. Not the clearest as to what will be on the exams. He does scale quite a bit so that helps.

Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Professor Shrestha is not wonderful at all. His lectures are incredibly boring and dry because he doesn't make it engaging nor does he differentiate what it is important and not so important to learn, his homework assignments are long & aren't worth very much & exams are challenging. It's a mandatory course, but be ready to learn from the textbook.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
ECON471
Grade: C
Jul 2, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I wish Ratna had a chance to be more specific. Most confusing assignments I've ever done in all of uni. Don't take not even an interesting class, just micro econ with oil as ur Good A

3.0
5.0
COMM295
Jul 9, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Ratna is a nice and caring prof but his lectures are dry, occasionally hard to understand his accent, and incredibly hard to follow as he mainly just leaves scribbles on the slides. Goes through clicker question but doesn't tell you what the right answer is which is frustrating. Exams are hard.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
5.0
3.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Jul 28, 2020
Would take again

Amazing lectures. Doesn't waste time and speaks clearly with a cool accent. Lectures are to the point and his slides are very easy to follow. He takes effort and time to answer student's questions. Inspires a non-econ student to be interested in econ.

Respected
Inspirational
Caring
4.0
3.0
ECON101
Aug 15, 2020
Would take again

Dr Shrestha is an excellent instructor. Although his class can get a little boring sometimes, the content is manageable and you're graded by quizzes on Mindtap (need to buy the access code), one midterm and a final.

Participation matters
Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
1.0
4.0
ECON295
Grade: A-
Oct 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

It is rare to find profs who are both respected and engaging lecturers, and also provide insightful guidance through the required course content. Ratna, however, is none of the above. Lectures were boring, poorly paced, and disorganized, but for some reason mandatory to attend, with exams containing content we did not cover in class. Great class!

Participation matters
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
ECON101102
Grade: Incomplete
Oct 23, 2020
Would take again

Dr. Shresth makes sure everyone understands the topic. I think a few of the students were quite unfair with his ratings because he really does care about his students and tries his best to teach the topics well. He also responds really quickly if you email him/ post on the Canvas discussions page.

Lots of homework
Accessible outside class
Caring
5.0
3.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Oct 23, 2020
Would take again

Ratna really cares for his students and wants them to do better! People are being so disrespectful to him for absolutely no reason. His exams are perfectly manageable if you do his clickers and study the notes and textbook.

1.0
5.0
COMM295
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 5, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This transition to online school is not easy for anyone. However, he is extremely hard to understand, it is very frustrating trying to follow. The midterm was based on stuff we did not even cover and he called it an "experiment" to combat cheating. I did not pay big money to participate in an experiment, I feel robbed of my education.

Get ready to read
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
ECON101
Nov 22, 2020
Would take again

Dr. Ratna can be a bit confusing at times, but nonetheless, he is a very good professor and understanding. Our class did terribly on the first midterm, and after that, he was very flexible with the reweighting of the exams and you can really tell he wants you to really succeed. He was very helpful for preparing us for our exams. Lots of respect.

Lots of homework
Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Dec 4, 2020
Would take again

Professor Shrestha is a solid professor. His lectures and textbook are useless, though. The online quizzes often do not correlate with midterm and final exams. To succeed in his class, do the poll questions (make sure you do them thoroughly) and make sure you attend office hours (he teaches more in office hours than lecture).

Clear grading criteria
3.0
3.0
ECON101
Dec 5, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Professor Ratna Shrestha is a decent prof, but his lectures are confusing and disorganized. I find it more helpful to just read his slides and watch Chapple's videos instead. Nevertheless, he cares a lot about his students, and I appreciate the fact he's flexible with the reweighing of exams. Can't say much about exams since he doesn't write them.

Gives good feedback
Graded by few things
Test heavy
3.0
4.0
ECON101
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 6, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This is a difficult conceptual course and it being online added another layer of difficulty to it. I think Ratna tries his best but the schedule would randomly change, and the test questions were stuff that we didn't necessarily go over. His lectures can be confusing, but I think he does truly care. You have to teach yourself a lot of the time.

3.0
4.0
ECON101
Grade: A-
Dec 8, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Will never another class with him. Although he is a sweet person but his lectures and practice questions are useless when it comes to midterms and finals

Accessible outside class
Test heavy
Tough grader
2.0
3.0
ECON101
Grade: A-
Dec 23, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Nice prof who cares about students. Unfortunately he is quite disorganized. Lectures were useless, occasional test questions are ambiguous or have bad wording. I did well enough because I did the content in HS but not sure I would've managed from scratch. Just do the HW well and use external resources (jacob clifford) if necessary to learn content.

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Grade: A
Jan 14, 2021
Would take again

He Really cares about his students. Since most part of this course was handled by the main course coordinator, there were more works to do. However, professor tried his best to adjust. Especially, during the final exam week, he hold the office hours almost every week( sometimes twice a week) for 2hours ++ depends on how many students ask question.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: A+
May 2, 2021
Would take again

Took both ECON 101/102 with Ratna and got 90+ in both courses. His lectures are dry and you can honestly skip them, just make sure to do the polls and practice MCs that he posts. He's a great person overall and if you put in the work it's easy to get a high score.

Accessible outside class
Test heavy
Caring
5.0
3.0
ECON101
Jul 21, 2021
Would take again

Dr. Shreshta is such a nice guy. He explains slowly, clearly and empathetically. I think he's great for people who are nervous to take economics or stem in general. He always stays late after class, and he is really caring to those in different situations.

Accessible outside class
Amazing lectures
Caring
2.0
4.0
ECON101
Aug 17, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Ugh. His explanations during lectures are extremely confusing. Mainly because he backtracks a LOT and explains the same point several times before suddenly skipping an in-between step. Have to buy the Pearson homework. You might get a better answer if you email him. Good luck!

Accessible outside class
Graded by few things
Test heavy
3.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: A+
Dec 19, 2021
Would take again

Lecture pace might be too fast without any breaks making it hard to pay attention as the course content is very heavy. However, this prof is super accommodating and willing to help- always holds extra office hours and responds to emails quickly. He also prepares us well for exams by going over hard questions and providing many resources.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
1.0
5.0
295
Grade: Not sure yet
May 24, 2022

terrible

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 9, 2022

Ratna's lectures are not very engaging and most students aren't paying attention. He doesn't seem passionate about what he's teaching and either goes through material extremely fast or extremely slow (there's no in between) so it's hard to follow along. The exams are relatively fair though if you study and do the practice tests.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
4.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: A+
Jul 6, 2022
Would take again

Ratna's lectures may be a bit bland, but I didn't find him to be that bad. His slides are clean and easy to read, clicker questions had the right amount of difficulty to practice for exams. If you reach out to him for help he will patiently explain to you the concept you are struggling with. I didn't read the textbook at all and still scored high.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A+
Aug 6, 2022
Would take again

Very low maintenance professor, just complete the homework, iClickers, and exams. Lectures can be bland but his slides are straight to the point and very reflective of his exams. Offers all of the previous years' exams which are great practice. Consider the textbook supplemental, as he only uses it for the diagrams. Overall not as bad as people say

5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: Rather not say
Oct 8, 2022
Would take again

Ratna is, suffice to say, my favourite professor that I have ever had. He is the most amazing person, I can still imagine vividly in my mind, him saying "business school". I loved when he spoke about Coke and Pepsi. He is the most genuine guy, and he always put a smile on my face. Thank you Ratna. Lectures are quite bland and exams are quite fair.

Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
ECON310
Grade: C+
Oct 25, 2022

It's clear he cares. He gets back fast by email. He is very nice, and I feel bad about saying this, but he is a poor teacher. His lectures are confusing. He had to scale the midterm because our average was so low. I don't have an econ background but he expected everyone to have a strong baseline. It's possible his higher-level courses are better.

Caring
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
1.0
3.0
ECON310
Grade: C
Dec 11, 2022

Ratna's nice, but his lectures are bad. I'm usually a decent student but he's horrible at explaining things. I felt lost the entire semester. The tests are hard. Maybe if you go to all his office hours it's better.

5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: Incomplete
Dec 14, 2022
Would take again

Ratna's simply the GOAT when it comes to 295. People exaggerate when they say he's hard to understand or a bad prof. If you pay attention to what he's saying, he explains key concepts so much better than other professors I've encountered and focuses on the contnet. He's accessible outside class and holds incredibly useful review sessions too!

Gives good feedback
Caring
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
COMM295
Dec 17, 2022
Would take again

Ratna made 295 really smooth. It is clear that he cares a lot about how well his classes do in the course, sending us constant reminders to complete the practice tests in order to improve and holding many review sessions and office hours. He is also easily reachable through the discussion forums and will answer all your questions promptly.

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Grade: B-
Jan 17, 2023
Would take again

He's ok.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
ECON311
Grade: C
May 2, 2023

He is a great person and accessible after class if you have any questions but he over complicates concepts and his lectures are not enjoyable. He also spends a considerable amount of time on simple and easy to understand concepts and then speeds through more complex course material. The readings are important and the only reason I passed.

Tough grader
Accessible outside class
4.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A
Jan 8, 2024
Would take again

This class is not a note-taking class, the best advice I have is to listen very closely and sometimes annotate his notes with examples. He teaches concepts in an understandable, but unique way. Go to class, pay attention, and the curve will get you a good grade.

Gives good feedback
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
2.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: B-
Jan 10, 2024

Dr. Shrestha's lectures are not note-taker friendly. You're better off just watching him scribble on a powerpoint slide, it can be messy but if you listen it may help. Attendance is somewhat mandatory depending on iClickers that day. Probably take other profs. Has ok office hours and will make async videos before exams, and curves grades up.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
COMM295
Grade: B
Jan 11, 2024
Would take again

he is very kind and caring, and will host review sessions according to students' needs and answer any questions outside of class. tough course, but to do well, you must go to class, pay close attention and annotate his slides rather than make your own notes.

Caring
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
4.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: B+
Sep 8, 2024
Would take again

Ratna's COMM295 class has a unique teaching style, but if you engage with it, the content clicks. The lectures can be dense, so annotating slides is key. Attendance is mandatory, but the curve helps a lot. I found unstuckstudy AI super helpful for exam prep alongside the practice tests.

2.0
5.0
COMM295
Grade: C+
Sep 12, 2024

Trying to keep up with writing whatever he's scribbling down on a paper not using slides, as I'm not able to understand a word he's saying.

1.0
5.0
295
Grade: A+
Sep 26, 2024

The professor just keeps speaking all the time without paying attention if the students are getting the point or not. His handwriting is bad and you won't get anything. DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE WITH HIM!!

So many papers
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: B-
Dec 29, 2024

Ratna tries his best to help students by hosting review sessions, but most do not find it helpful. His unique teaching style isn't fitting for notetakers as he discourages writing and asks students to just listen. I would avoid taking COMM 295 with him.

1.0
3.0
295
Grade: Not sure yet
May 18, 2025

No. Save yourself and run.

4.0
3.0
295
Jun 3, 2025
Would take again

Hes nice and sweet. He explains coencpts really well you just need to pay attention. Sometimes hes a bit repetitive but thts fine. Overall I REALLY liked his course. It was a bit misstructured but if you read the tbb and go to his office hours ur good

1.0
5.0
COMM295
Grade: B
Jul 9, 2025

Save yourself while you can...

Tough grader
So many papers
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A-
Jul 9, 2025
Would take again

literally the best prof ive ever had. Hes answered literally every stupid doubt ive ever had, and always holds office hours, which can go on for hours. Super accessible outside of class, explains stuff in great detail, he did rush a bit at the end but I dont blame him, he had to finish his syllabus. Hes the goat if I could I would take him again:)

Get ready to read
Caring
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A+
Sep 13, 2025
Would take again

This class is challenging, which is why many of the reviews are negative. Ratna himself is a great prof and if you actually listen in class, the concepts become easier to understand. He provides a lot of practice material that is super helpful, and he is extremely generous with his time giving lots of office hours.

1.0
4.0
295
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 10, 2025

Does not know how to teach. Rambles about unrelated topics causing the class to get behind on lectures, therefore forcing him to rush through the lectures.

1.0
5.0
295
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 14, 2025

you are so cooked

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Accessible outside class
1.0
5.0
COMM295
Grade: B+
Nov 24, 2025

Ratna is extremely unorganized, and lectures often run significantly overtime because he cannot finish the material within the scheduled class period. When students' test scores are lower than expected he tends to express frustration toward the students rather than reflecting on or improving his own teaching methods. DON'T TAKE HIM

1.0
5.0
295
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 24, 2025

He tends to respond differently to students based on how well they follow his instructions and how you achieves, which makes the class feel very uneven. When test scores are lower than he expects, he often directs his frustration at students instead of reflecting on his teaching. If you are a teachers pet you would ace this course without hard work

1.0
4.0
295
Nov 25, 2025

He is a good person but not a good teacher.

5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 24, 2025
Would take again

Amazing prof if you just LISTEN. Put down your pencil- his slides have it all. Really peel your eyes and ears and you'll realize his 'rambles' are real-life examples that help solidify your knowledge. The content is VERY fair if you did any practice (which he gives SO much of). Also he keeps many office hours anytime if you just request- cares sm.

Caring
Test heavy
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
COMM295
Grade: A+
Dec 28, 2025
Would take again

Best Sauder prof for Winter Term 1! I don't usually go to lectures, especially on rainy days, but his notes are perfect for review. Definitely a GPA booster if you practice. I've heard he offers extra office hours. Super caring and supportive!

Group projects
Clear grading criteria
Caring
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

64%

Textbook Required

47%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 78 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (21)
A (18)
Not sure yet (15)
Grade Distribution
A(39)B(12)C(7)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(19)
Based on 97 reported grades
A+: 21
A: 18
Not sure yet: 15
A-: 15
Common Tags
Get ready to read (22)
Clear grading criteria (19)
Accessible outside class (17)
Caring (16)
Graded by few things (14)
Tough grader (12)
Test heavy (12)
Lecture heavy (12)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.12 avg change
Jun
Jul
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ECON201

5.0

(1)

COM394

5.0

(1)

ECON101102

4.2

(5)

ECON451

4.0

(1)

ECON320

4.0

(1)
+19 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ECON

5.0

ECOM310311

5.0

295

4.2

102

4.0

301

4.0

Similar Professors