3.0

Richard Fumerton

Philosophy - University of Iowa

3.0
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
27%
Would Retake
101
Reviews
3.0
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.9
Clarity

27%

Would Retake

101

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

27

4

22

3

11

2

12

1

29

What Students Say

Everything Richard says comes from a place of privilege

PHIL1234 - 1.0 rating

Anti-abortion deplorable

INTROTOETHICS - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

8%

Textbook Required

36%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 44 grades
Most common grades:
A (24)
A- (8)
A+ (6)
Grade Distribution
A(30)B(4)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 48 reported grades
A: 24
A-: 8
A+: 6
B: 3
Common Tags
Accessible outside class (16)
Graded by few things (14)
Online Savvy (11)
Get ready to read (9)
Lecture heavy (7)
Respected (5)
Tough grader (5)
Caring (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.22 avg change
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHILOSIPHY

5.0

(4)

PHILTHEJUST

5.0

(1)

PHIL126

5.0

(1)

AFEW

5.0

(1)

PJS0000

5.0

(1)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILOFSCIENCE

5.0

PHIL

4.0

JUSTSOCI

4.0

PHILJUST

3.5

PHIL2402

3.5

Reviews (101)
3.0
2.0
INTROTOP
Nov 23, 2002

his lectures are somewhat unorganized and confusing

1.0
4.0
PHIL
Mar 14, 2003

This guy appears to wing it in every class. Who needs prep when you've got tenure?

1.0
3.0
4570
Apr 4, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
6363
Dec 11, 2003

Monotone voice is mind numming

5.0
2.0
PHILOSIPHY
Dec 11, 2003

He's so great and extremely willing to help students. He's so nice and I loved his class and everyone should take his class

5.0
2.0
PHILOSIPHY
Dec 12, 2003

Great teacher and goes above and beyond what a professor is expected to do. I'd recommend any class he teaches, he really cares about his students!

4.0
2.0
JUSTSOC
Mar 22, 2004

Lectures and reading are sometimes boring, but if you like the subject he's a good prof to learn from

1.0
5.0
ETHICS
May 18, 2004

Confusing, boring.

5.0
2.0
ETHICS
Oct 4, 2004

He has a very distinct way of explaining things, but after I got used to it I had no problems. He is extremely helpful and a wonderful professor. I would recommend him, especially if you are already interested in the subject.

5.0
3.0
JUSTSOCIETY
Dec 2, 2004

Has a very intelligent/slightly-morbid sense of humor. Lectures are interesting if you can concentrate...they can be hard to follow. Going to lecture is essential, which is good - you get your money's worth.

3.0
3.0
JUSTSOCIETY
Dec 2, 2004

This is a good class if you are interested in the subject, but otherwise it would probably be boring. It will be a lot more enjoyable if you can pick up on his jokes, cause he can be really funny, although he is sometimes hard to follow. It's one of those things that is better with time.

5.0
3.0
ETHICS
Dec 18, 2004

He's one the best professors I've had. will answer your questions and help you understand anything you're confused about during office hours. very funny. take it in the summer if you can it's easier esp. with him. his tests are pretty straightforward too (if you take good notes & pay attention).

5.0
2.0
PHILTHEJUST
Dec 27, 2004

Fumerton is a great teacher if you dont sleep in class. He sometimes goes fast but all of the material is clearly covered. Plus, if youre interested and stay awake, you hear some funny stuff.

4.0
1.0
2634
Jan 11, 2005

His lectures were not that exciting, but they were good for learning the material. His study guides for the final and midterm were fabulous. The class was a really large gen ed, so it couldn't get too exciting, but that did make it so easy for anyone willing to actually try at all.

1.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY
Jan 11, 2005

what a terrible class. so boring.

5.0
2.0
PHILOSIPHY
Feb 17, 2005

i loved him, his study guides, and how helpful he was druing office hours.

4.0
5.0
INTROTOETHICS
Apr 7, 2005

Very unorganized, midterm was really hard I got a 50%=C on curve? Good lecturer, funny, understands people really well. Wish he would prepare slides or some kind of study guide before the class. TONS of info not in books and just given randomly during lecutre - tough to get.

5.0
2.0
PHILOSIPHY
May 2, 2005

Love him!

3.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY
Grade: A-
Sep 9, 2005

No Comments

3.0
4.0
PHILOSOPHY
Oct 17, 2005

I don't really think he means to be, and he seems awfully nice, but he is so incredibly boring. My mind might not be made for Philosophy, but really, I fall asleep everytime in that class, it's painful. He could try to do something to grab more attention, like change the tone of his voice.

3.0
3.0
PHILO
Grade: A-
Oct 19, 2005

he's an ok teacher. the class could be more interesting iff we didn't have to study that stupid book that he wrote/translated. he's a good speaker but i'm not interested in what old philophers have to say about what justice is. i would rather argue my opinion than listen to someone talk about other ppls not even their own. i like the disscusions when they get going be sure to talk a lot in them.

4.0
3.0
PHILTHEJS
Nov 1, 2005

Fumerton is great - his lectures are interesting, he has a sense of humor, he outlines very well what you will need to know for the tests, and gives study guides as well as offers study sessions.

3.0
3.0
PHILOJUSTSOC
Grade: C+
Nov 7, 2005

A nice guy, very personable. Always approachable with questions or thoughts after lecture or in office hours, and is very good about review sessions. Has a bad habit of rambling in lecture, though, and as a result sometimes hurries important facts and ideas.

4.0
3.0
PHILOSFORJUS
Nov 29, 2005

He is an expert on his subject. His lectures can be very entertaining. The class is hard, but he gives you the test questions beforehand. Sometimes he jumps around, but holds review sessions and is very helpful.

2.0
3.0
JUSTSOCIETY
Dec 6, 2005

Boring...Boring...Boring... everything is so open ended, there's never a right answer... great review sessions, but other than that, if you can stay awake, you deserve at least a B

5.0
1.0
ETHICS
Dec 6, 2005

Really interesting class and if you just come to class you will get a good grade. All the things that were on the midterm were told to us and went over numerous times. Also, class was a pleasure, he made the class so much more interesting. He's a great lecturer and I can't wait to take another class with him.

3.0
3.0
PH102
Dec 7, 2005

Rambles at times but easy to follow most of the time. Lack organization at times.

4.0
4.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
May 28, 2006

Man, this class was so confusing to us non-graduate students but Fumerton is understanding.

1.0
5.0
PHILOFSCIENCE
May 30, 2006

No Comments

5.0
1.0
PHIL126
Aug 18, 2006

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHIL34
Dec 20, 2007

Interesting lectures. Thought provoking material. Fairly amusing.

5.0
3.0
AFEW
Aug 20, 2008

A great professor--anything he teaches is really worth taking.

4.0
4.0
JUSTSOCI
Oct 19, 2010

He goes off on a lot of tangents, but those tangents are important! If you pay attention in lecture, try to follow his reasoning, and take detailed notes so that you can understand them later, you'll do fine. He is very nice, but the course is kind of boring.

4.0
2.0
PHIL1
Jan 10, 2011

Probably the smartest teacher ive ever had

2.0
3.0
JUSTSOC
Jan 13, 2011

He's a good professor, he rambles a lot and goes off on tangents that don't make sense at the time, but they're good examples for the exams. Make sure to read the textbook!

4.0
3.0
PHIL034
Mar 16, 2011

Fumerton is hilarious (in a morbid and sometimes subtle way) and very intelligent. I feel like attending lectures and going to the review sessions will get you an A in the class (along with not completely bombing the paper). I've taken 3 classes with him now and plan to take more in my senior year. Highly recommended to take the class w a friend

5.0
3.0
PJS0000
Apr 1, 2011

First philosophy class I took at the university as a freshman, and he made it absolutely amazing! I enjoyed every minute of it!

5.0
2.0
PJSAAA
Apr 1, 2011

First phil. class I ever took at the University as a freshman, and I loved it! He made it interesting, and I ate up every minute of class!

5.0
4.0
JUSTSOC
May 4, 2011

Philosophy and the Just Society. Awesome class, awesome professor. Fumerton is a wonderful lecturer! If you have an interest in philosophy, do pursue this course. Some kids were dozing off, saying the course is tough...if you pay attention, do the readings, and attend the review sessions, you'll do fine.

5.0
3.0
PHILJUST
Oct 21, 2011

Honestly, best professor I've had so far in college. In my group of friends he's considered a legendary badass. He's the type to show up to lecture in sandals with socks and sweats if that gives you an idea. He's also very helpful - he gives you his home phone so you can call for questions, and goes over every question on the test at reviews.

4.0
3.0
PHIL34
Dec 3, 2011

Fumerton is a great teacher. He's really helpful in review sessions for the tests. He comes to lecture in sweats and a t-shirt. I took this class on a recommendation that he would be a great lecturer and he is. Makes the class really interesting. First philosophy class, and definitely not the last.

5.0
1.0
PHIL1234
Dec 12, 2012

The best teacher ever! He is kind and just a wonderful person, makes lectures fun to listen too and even boring topics are turned into something relatable. He gives his phone numbers and takes calls almost any time. Really loves his students!

5.0
1.0
ETHICS
May 9, 2013

One of my favorite professors. If you can read a philosophy book and understand it, take the course, it should be an easy A. If you are confused by philosophy, you might not do so well. He has very good explanations and stories. Awesome professor.

5.0
4.0
PHILJUST
Sep 11, 2013

Very articulate and passionate about the subject. Go to the review sessions; they help out so much!

5.0
2.0
PHIL1034
Nov 5, 2013

SUCH A GREAT PROFESSOR! It is because of Fumerton that I am a Philosophy major. His lectures are great and he clearly explains the material. Often you don't need to read the text to do well in the course because he explains it so well in lecture. Not alot of work for this course either. HIGHLY RECOMMEND DR. FUMERTON!

4.0
1.0
JUSTSOC
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2013

no need to read the book, just go to class and do the review... the review was the test -- do that and you can't get below a B

4.0
2.0
PHIL034
Sep 8, 2014

He would often go on tangents, and it was hard to pay attention in class. He made up for it in the review sessions though. I could have only gone to those two sessions and never gone to class and I would've still walked out with at least a B.

4.0
1.0
JUSTSOCIETY
Oct 29, 2014

Go to study sessions and you will do fine in this class, if you skip class, don't do readings, and then skip study session you will obviously fail. If you do two out of those three you should get at least a B. Some lectures are very interesting some are kind of bland depends on person I guess. Overall great professor I would recommend

4.0
3.0
JUSTSOCIETY
Grade: A-
Jan 10, 2015

I took Philosophy & the Just Society thinking it would be a boring gen ed, but Fumerton's passion for philosophy and availability during & outside of office hours changed my mind. You don't need to read the materials if you go to lecture; even the review sessions go over all the exam questions. Overall great course.

4.0
1.0
PHIL1034
Jan 25, 2015

Class had only 3 graded assignments: a midterm, a final, and a 5-page paper. Lots of reading, but you can get away not reading everything if you go to lecture. Lectures can end up being long and boring, or short and interesting, depending on the topic. The review sessions are the key to the tests; go to them and you'll likely do well.

4.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A
Nov 12, 2015

Fumerton is old and has tenure and you can tell, and the result is hilarious. He wears sweatclothes everywhere, and demonstrates philosophical concepts with macabre examples in his lectures, which is a constant source of humor in the Philosophy department. Would recommend.

5.0
1.0
PHIL034
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2016

A great epistemologist! The greatest professor/philosopher I've ever met!

1.0
4.0
PHIL1234
Sep 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Everything Richard says comes from a place of privilege.

5.0
3.0
PHIL1234
Grade: A
Mar 10, 2019
Would take again

He changed my life. I wish I could go back 20 years and take more if his classes. I took a few.

Respected
Accessible outside class
Participation matters
1.0
4.0
PHIL1034
May 20, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Please don't take a class with him!!

Get ready to read
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
PHIL1034
Grade: B
Jul 3, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He only assigns white authors!! White. Males. Must. Do. Better.

Gives good feedback
Caring
4.0
1.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A
Nov 21, 2019
Would take again

Prof. Fumerton is a talker, but he literally will hand you an A if you try just a bit. The questions for the midterm and final are given to you in advance. Just answer them and check with your TA if they are right and you will be fine. Do the readings if you want, but SparkNotes works just as well.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A-
Dec 13, 2019
Would take again

Fumerton is a really great lecturer. He uses philosophical texts to introduce ideas and controversies in philosophy, always being fair but interrogative to the topic. He has a free-wheeling and blunt style of speaking that really spices up the lecture, and he really makes you think deeply about why you believe certain things.

Accessible outside class
Graded by few things
Amazing lectures
2.0
2.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A
Feb 14, 2020
Wouldn't take again

SO BORING

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A+
Feb 20, 2020
Would take again

Fumerton is a great professor, not sure what other people are talking about. His lectures are hilarious, he uses totally obscure real-life examples to demonstrate philosophical concepts and it is somehow also very effective in teaching. He also puts the exact exam questions on the study guides, so idk how you could really complain about the class

Graded by few things
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
PHIL2402
Grade: A
Apr 25, 2020
Would take again

This gentleman is basically a sage. He can tell so many stories and give many clear examples about different kinds of philosophical theories. Always ready to encourage students to think and is available during offices hours. He basically tells you what is on the paper and exams, so be ready for some valuable learning.

Respected
Inspirational
Hilarious
4.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A-
Nov 9, 2020
Would take again

I think Fumerton did a good job for someone who doesn't really enjoy philosophy all that much. The review sessions were so helpful and he would stay on for however long just to make sure everyone's questions were answered. You can even call him any time of the day if you have questions.

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
PHIL4485
Grade: A
Jun 18, 2021
Would take again

I really enjoyed taking Political Philosophy with Dr. Fumerton. Class discussions were engaging despite being over Zoom. We discussed our papers in most classes, giving everyone the chance to share their perspectives on the material. The participation grade was based on attendance, but if you had to miss a couple of classes it was no big deal.

Respected
Accessible outside class
Graded by few things
2.0
2.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
May 3, 2022

A stereotype of an old white male!

Accessible outside class
1.0
2.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Oct 14, 2022

Such a dope

Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 23, 2022
Would take again

Professor Fumerton is a great lecturer. He uses real-world examples and humor in his lectures. He is very accessible outside of class, offering his email and phone number for students to contact him whenever. The only downfall to this class is that there are only three things that are graded. Otherwise, it is enjoyable and not too difficult.

Amazing lectures
Respected
Accessible outside class
1.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Jan 10, 2023

Catty and passive-aggressive.

Get ready to read
Online Savvy
4.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A
Apr 7, 2023
Would take again

Fumerton is very knowledgeable and explains concepts clearly. Lecture gets boring bc he spends the entire time on one example. However, if you understand and regurgitate what he says on exams you are fine. The paper had an vague instructions and grading criteria, but he is available to call late if you have questions. Review sessions are v helpful.

Respected
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
2.0
4.0
PHIL1034
Grade: B-
Apr 17, 2023

This was the most boring class I have ever taken. You must read philosophical readings from 200 years ago and understand what they say. You are graded on 2 exams (graded tough), one paper(graded tough), and participation. There are pop quizzes as well. My TA was terrible. Bad class to take as a gen-ed.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
3.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: Not sure yet
May 2, 2023
Would take again

Not the most enjoyable class to take, the lectures tend to get boring. Only graded by a midterm, paper, and final exam. You are graded fairly harshly depending on your TA. If you go to lecture, discussion and review sessions you will get an A or B.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
2.0
4.0
PHIL1034
May 10, 2023

Lectures were pretty bland and hard to listen to. Exams were all essay questions. Professor seems like a good person but the structure and unorthodox grading system that he uses is not great. Does not put any grades in till after the final, only grades a midterm, final, final paper, and discussion attendance. Way too difficult for an intro class.

Tough grader
Beware of pop quizzes
Graded by few things
2.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Aug 25, 2023

Vapid.

Accessible outside class
3.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A-
Sep 6, 2023

creepy !!

Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
Feb 7, 2024

People with extremely low levels of testosterone have next to no facial hair.

Online Savvy
1.0
2.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A+
Mar 13, 2024

Robert Barnes/Ryan Dawson tier. Doubt he can grow facial hair.

Online Savvy
1.0
2.0
INTROTOETHICS
Grade: A
Mar 15, 2024

This fragile old white male needs to retire.

4.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A-
Apr 18, 2024

Good professor however I would not recommend the class. Lectures were so boring and confusing and my TA graded very harshly. You're only graded on 1 paper a midterm and a final and none of the information makes sense at all.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
PHIL1034
Grade: A+
May 4, 2024

Richard's a karen.

Online Savvy
1.0
1.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
Sep 20, 2024

John Rawls: richard fumerton :: Mick Jagger: Jelly Roll

1.0
3.0
INTROTOETHICS
Grade: A-
Nov 11, 2024

Anti-abortion deplorable! Women's rights are human rights!!!

Get ready to read
4.0
4.0
INTROTOETHICS
Grade: A
Dec 17, 2024

Professor Fumerton is a very smart and humorous professor. Lectures can get boring and concepts can be hard to understand, but he's very accommodating with office hours. Only graded on 1 paper, midterm, and final, but he has grading scale that makes it very easy to get a good grade.

Test heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
INTROTOETHICS
Grade: A
Dec 24, 2024

High IQ, low Testosterone. Completely vapid.

Caring
Online Savvy
4.0
2.0
ETHICS
Grade: A
Jan 26, 2025
Would take again

You could honestly not go to any lectures, read the slides, and attend Prof. Fumerton's (VERY helpful) review sessions before the midterm and the final. The only grading components were the midterm, a paper, and the final, which sounds daunting, but his grading scale made it easy to get a good grade. Lectures were often boring but sometimes funny.

Beware of pop quizzes
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
ETHICS
Grade: A+
Feb 4, 2025
Would take again

Impotent men like Richard are why America is in decline. I refuse to show him respect.

Online Savvy
1.0
2.0
INTROTOETHICS
Grade: A
Feb 18, 2025

Jodi Ernst/Nancy Mace/Matt Schlapp style of masculinity.

Online Savvy
1.0
1.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A+
Feb 25, 2025

I found myself in the hothouse

Accessible outside class
1.0
1.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A+
Feb 25, 2025

He makes Ron Desantis look like Edward I.

1.0
3.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
Mar 16, 2025

He doesn't have the capacity to have actual insights.

1.0
3.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
Apr 11, 2025

Richard is impotent.

Online Savvy
1.0
1.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
Apr 21, 2025

Jeff Metcalf tier

Online Savvy
3.0
2.0
PHIL1034
Grade: B
Apr 30, 2025
Would take again

not a bad professor whatsoever, just not super interesting unfortunately. seems like a nice guy. readings kinda sucked but were pretty interesting, just long. paper at the end of the semester seems awful but not that bad

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
May 4, 2025

I found this old white male so creepy when I met with him outside of class!

Accessible outside class
1.0
1.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
May 10, 2025

Richard, you aren't 1/10,0000 of John Rawls, who was actually masculine, whose work had actually substance. Richard, do you know why are your eyebrows are so sprase]

Online Savvy
1.0
1.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
May 10, 2025

He talks about how far right wing he is. He thinks that makes him masculine. It doesn't. The Equivalent of hard blinker low IQ low T James Lindsay, whose proud to show himself spreading his legs in his twitter profile pic. Insignificant, his life meant nothing.

Online Savvy
1.0
2.0
EPISTEMOLOGY
Grade: A
May 17, 2025

Richard's the sort of submissive dopey guy who could go see a stand up comic and her bit is "I thought I was gonna fart, but then it was more than a fart" and actually like it (he's not just being nice).

Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
PHIL2402
Grade: A
May 26, 2025

omg, i wish i hadn't taken his class. he was so creepy to me i was so creeped out and repulsed..

Caring
Accessible outside class
2.0
4.0
PHIL1034
Grade: B
Dec 3, 2025

This class was NOT what I thought it would be. As my first philosophy class, Richard made the topics hard for me to understand. He spent most lectures rambling on about hypotheticals or personal experiences that made it difficult to follow and pay attention. I will say, the study guides (that matched the exam ?s were good). Had to teach myself...

So many papers
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
1.0
4.0
PHIL1034
Grade: C
Dec 10, 2025

readings were extremely long, roughly 40 pages two sided and a waste of time. entire course grade is based on midterm, paper, and final and you don't get to know your grade until they put it in the grade report bc it's not accessible on ICON. said they were going to "grade easy" and then gave bad grades. avoid this class if you can - waste of time

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
PHIL1034
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 10, 2025

Richard reminds me of Pete ButtGig.

Accessible outside class
2.0
4.0
PHIL1034
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 15, 2025

On a positive note, Richard was always accessible outside of class and made that clear. However, this class made me hate philosophy ngl. Throughout the semester, there are 3 assignments... A final, midterm, and paper with zero guidelines. Also, grades aren't posted on ICON at all.. stressful bc exam is next week & idk what my grade is...

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
2.0
2.0
PHIL1034
Dec 16, 2025

I have no words, this class isn't easy at all

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Accessible outside class
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

8%

Textbook Required

36%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 44 grades
Most common grades:
A (24)
A- (8)
A+ (6)
Grade Distribution
A(30)B(4)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 48 reported grades
A: 24
A-: 8
A+: 6
B: 3
Common Tags
Accessible outside class (16)
Graded by few things (14)
Online Savvy (11)
Get ready to read (9)
Lecture heavy (7)
Respected (5)
Tough grader (5)
Caring (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.22 avg change
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHILOSIPHY

5.0

(4)

PHILTHEJUST

5.0

(1)

PHIL126

5.0

(1)

AFEW

5.0

(1)

PJS0000

5.0

(1)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILOFSCIENCE

5.0

PHIL

4.0

JUSTSOCI

4.0

PHILJUST

3.5

PHIL2402

3.5

Similar Professors