4.3

Richard Zach

Philosophy - University of Calgary

4.3
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
92%
Would Retake
94
Reviews
4.3
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
4.5
Helpful
4.2
Clarity

92%

Would Retake

94

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

56

4

22

3

13

2

2

1

1

What Students Say

Zach is clearly the best

PHIL579 - 5.0 rating

This course is easy, except Dr

PHIL279 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

95% confidence
Based on 20 grades
Most common grades:
A (10)
A+ (5)
A- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 22 reported grades
A: 10
A+: 5
A-: 3
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Caring (13)
Lots of homework (10)
Respected (6)
Clear grading criteria (6)
Gives good feedback (5)
Accessible outside class (5)
Amazing lectures (4)
Participation matters (3)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.23 avg change
Mar
Apr
May
Dec
Jan
Feb
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

279

5.0

(3)

PJYL279

5.0

(1)

PHIL579

5.0

(1)

PHIL479

5.0

(1)

PHILI279

4.7

(3)
+5 more courses
Difficulty by Course

LOGIC1

5.0

PHIL479

5.0

PHIL415

4.0

PHIL579

4.0

PHIL279

3.4

Reviews (94)
5.0
2.0
PJYL279
Jan 17, 2002

Its an easy course, and Richard makes it easier, take it with him - EASY A

3.0
5.0
PHIL279
Apr 29, 2002

Boring prof, makes the assignments hard and Long. NOT recommended

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
May 11, 2002

Nice guy, hard course, a lot of work

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Jul 30, 2002

lot of work, but worth it

5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Jul 30, 2002

lots of computer-enhanced stuff, well-oprganized course

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Jul 30, 2002

clear, fair, accessible. recommended!

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Aug 9, 2002

No Comments

5.0
3.0
PHIL307
Sep 12, 2002

lots of reading. awesome class, though

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Oct 20, 2002

He's like online 24/7 to answer questions!

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
Nov 2, 2002

Grading scale is rediculous, 70% = D+ on my midterm?! Assignments horribly

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 5, 2002

Very accessible and helpful

5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Nov 7, 2002

Make the midterm and Final easier, please. Great, Helpful Teacher.

5.0
1.0
279
Nov 8, 2002

Rick is too good .... I love this guy!

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

Nice guy & excellent online support material, but the assignments are TOO long!

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

Interesting course but ASSIGNMENTS TAKE TOO MUCH TO COMPLETE!!

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

[ZACH'S PHIL 279] + [4 OTHER COURSES] = ZERO HOURS OF FREE TIME + NO SLEEP!!

3.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

Great guy but his assignments consume TOO much time!

3.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

I agree. He's a good prof but the amount of workload for his course is crazy!!

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Grade: A-
Nov 8, 2002

His assignments leave you withVERY LITTLE time to devote to your OTHER courses!!

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

More work involved for this course than ANY other course I've EVER done!!

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

No Comments

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
Nov 8, 2002

With 4/more other courses, it is VERY TOUGH to fit in all the work he sets!

4.0
5.0
PHIL279
Nov 9, 2002

So much to read & understand in so little time!!

5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Nov 11, 2002

Definitely a smart guy, and always willing to help. Fun course for PHIL students

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 11, 2002

nice suits!

5.0
3.0
279
Nov 13, 2002

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Nov 28, 2002

Great Prof, excellent online help.

5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Dec 3, 2002

He teaches in style

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Dec 8, 2002

yeah, it's a lot of work. that's what university is all about. stop whining.

5.0
1.0
PHIL279
Dec 10, 2002

love the attire ... down to earth guy ... easy course

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

4.0
2.0
PHIL279
Dec 17, 2002

His assignments took like no time. Pretty easy overall

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Jan 23, 2003

Great guy. Definately the coolest teacher thus far. Relates well with students

3.0
3.0
PHIL279
Feb 7, 2003

Assignments: VERY lengthy & more time-consuming than for most 200 level courses

2.0
3.0
PHIL279
Apr 8, 2003

His notes are very messy, and he's the way he presents the material is very boring.

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Apr 29, 2003

The course materials were hard to understand but the assignments assigned by prof really helped me understand the material better. It was hard course but fun as well.

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
May 10, 2003

Assignments were long and repetitive

4.0
2.0
PHIL307
Dec 29, 2003

One of the more memorable profs who has a unique approach towards teaching. Down to earth and easy to get along with.

3.0
5.0
LOGIC1
Jun 26, 2004

this guy is very effing sexy. distractingly so, as a matter of fact. hot accent, hot suits, hot cufflinks, good god damn. unfortunately, i had to wipe my drool & concentrate, it was a REALLY demanding (& time consuming) course.

3.0
3.0
PHIL379
Aug 16, 2004

Zach is a great guy. He would probably be an excellent 279 prof. I had great difficulty getting anything out of his 379 lectures though. He talks and teaches like a textbook. For me it would have been far better taught in plain english.

5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Jan 30, 2006

Dr. Zach is a good professor and makes the course interesting. He is funny and sort of quirky. His assignments are somewhat hard and lengthy, but his lectures are very straight forward. He is good at explaining and clarifying things if something is unclear.

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Apr 18, 2006

Zach is a really awesome guy. He'll help you out with anything. He knows logic very well, and you'll learn tons. His assignments are long, >15 hours each. But you shouldn't get less than 100%, because you can grade them yourself. This course is challenging, but it's very straightforward. Zach is really cool, endearing, and a very stylish dresser.

3.0
4.0
PHIL415
Oct 24, 2006

The only thing I didn't like about his class work was a group assignment we had to do. Group work = bad. Also there is usually almost always a computer mark in there somewhere, where you have to participate on an online forum or something. Other than that, he is really nice and super hot. He always looks like an CIA agent.

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Mar 13, 2009

Very good Prof in my opinion. At first i was iffy, he seemed really nervous and said "um" alot. But once you get into the actual course he really brightens up and loves to topic of logic.

3.0
5.0
PHIL307
Mar 15, 2009

Assignments must be concise, if this is not your speciality, you will find his classes demanding. You must do the readings to succeed. There is always an online component to his classes (discussion board). Can be unorganized, you have to be an active listener to benefit from his classes. Don't zone out.

4.0
2.0
PHILI279
Sep 25, 2009

Good looking, he dresses up very nicely...he explians so simply ans treat students humbly...he is really good Pro

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Sep 30, 2009

Good teacher, fairly easy course. As long as you do a little bit of work on the assignments each day they are perfectly manageable and not unreasonable. Seems like a nice guy, impeccable dresser, but yeah, you have to pay active attention in lecture because his thoughts tend to be a little all over the place.

3.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 4, 2009

He is very difficult to understand because he stutters a lot, and I mean a lot. This is not the easiest course in the world but it is manageable. Use the book it is the only way to pass this class. But all in all he is a nice guy and pretty helpful.

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Dec 8, 2009

Awesome Prof. Workload can be heavy at times, but prof is very intelligent and willing to help, as are the TAs. Assignments are well thought out and if you do them you will ace the tests.

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Dec 11, 2009

Zach is nice and approachable. His lectures can be very confusing though, so don't depend on them. Read the textbook, practice practice practice, spread the assignment questions out evenly over the two weeks, and you should be fine.

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Dec 12, 2009

Easy to approach outside of class but sometimes the lectures can be hard to follow. I don't think it is any fault of his, but rather the fault of logic using phrases like "clearly it follows from" and "easily you can see" in an introductory course. Still would recommend, most of your grade is from assignments which you can dedicate yourself to.

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Dec 24, 2009

Excellent teacher, he definitely knows his stuff. The lectures and handouts are organized and helpful. There are tons of resources available: TA's, blackboard, and of course, the prof himself. I had a great experience with this course, although it can require a significant amount of time. (The prof is also frighteningly well dressed.)

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
Apr 20, 2010

smart. assignments were the hardest thing ever but lots of help available (online was crucial), and midterm and final are much much easier than assignments. provides practice midterm/final very similar to actual exams. oh and once i saw him not wearing a suit!!

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Dec 15, 2010

Awesome class. Do let me point out the fact that he uses a textbook that requires it to be new(~$70) & there are 6 assignments in this course which really makes you *learn* your stuff. I highly suggest that if you want to enjoy this course, to make use of the discussion board and form a study group. Tons of fun and fairly easy on grading.

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Dec 15, 2010

He taught us very well.You have to put lot of effort into this course.I had 4other courses and I'd have done better if I had more time to concentrate on logic.Don't take this with a full course load.Always engage in the discussion board.Take maximum use of office hours.TA Teppei is also helpful.Exams are similar to the practice.He is the best!!!

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Dec 15, 2010

His slides are vary helpful use them parallel to the book.Always use the hints he gives.Start the assignments as soon as you get them.Form a study group.Get help from the prof and the TA's.Final and the mid term are some what similar to the actuals.Final was challenging than the mid term. The best prof ever ! Select him if you taking this course!

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
Jan 24, 2011

I struggled with this course and the lectures were very boring. I tuned out a lot thinking of other things. Otherwise he knows his stuff and is pretty cool if you get to know him.

4.0
2.0
PHIL279
Feb 13, 2011

Very smart guy. Very helpful, and understanding. He cares + tries, but his lectures are very dry, and his lectures explain what should be simple concepts by using overly formal, complicated definitions followed by one typically complicated example. Book is weak, and reads like a novel instead of a text book. Assignments rely on software from book.

1.0
5.0
PHIL279
Oct 31, 2011

While he dresses impeccably, the volume of work is insane, you'll never be able to hold down a full course load with this. Fortunately I took a compsci class and knew alot of predicate logic beforehard, because I didn't find the level of instruction particularly good. Avoid this class/instructor at all costs!

4.0
2.0
PHIL279
Dec 1, 2011

Great guy !

3.0
5.0
PHIL279
Dec 13, 2011

If you are taking a full course load, do not take this class! Homework assignments take a ridiculous amount of time compared to my other courses. Overall nice guy, but hate philosophy after taking this class (It was mandatory)

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Jan 1, 2012

Dr. Zach is impeccably dressed and professional. He has a clear lecturing style and is enthusiastic about logic. Assignments are difficult and time consuming and grade rubric is tough (98% for an A+). Helpful in office hours, and cares about students. Very intelligent and has a deep understanding of a wide variety of topics in logic and mathematics

5.0
5.0
PHIL279
Jan 11, 2012

Do not take this class with a full course load.

5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Mar 6, 2012

Hands down the best introductory-level class. The assignments do take time, but they are worth half your mark and it is possible to get >100% (I did), and you can computer-grade them before submitting. Zach is a brilliant professor that is far above his position at the University.

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
Oct 12, 2012

I wouldn't recommend to take this course with this professor since he is the only one that uses a program to teach/mark. During class time he spends 10% of the time teaching concepts used in higher level Math or CompSci courses, 80% of the time teaching students how to use the program, and 10% going through examples while teach class concepts.

2.0
5.0
PHIL279
Oct 17, 2012

Prof is extremely boring in class. I find the TA's more helpful then the prof. Zach complicates the topics way too much. If you review the material and get help from TAs it isnt as hard as Zach makes them sound in class. He does not curve grades even though our class average was less then 50.. If you are not upto a challenge go with a diffrent prof

4.0
4.0
PHIL279
Dec 22, 2012

Dr. Zach is a good prof. Definitely a fun loving hipster, and really loves logic. The class contains resonably difficult concepts which prof. Zach sometimes over complicates. The work load is far too high for a first year course, tests are worth very little each though.

3.0
5.0
PHIL279
Feb 23, 2013

The workload is ridiculous for an intro class. There's an assignment every two weeks, and if you don't have a knack for the material, it can take days. I didn't find Zach very helpful, and he's a bit intimidating.

3.0
5.0
PHIL279
Oct 29, 2013

This course is easy, except Dr. Zach gives you a ridiculous amount of homework. As a student with a family, I had to drop the course. Not because it was hard (was sitting at a B+), but because of the workload. If you miss an assignment, you automatically lose 10% of your grade, and his grading scale is very harsh.

5.0
4.0
279
Jan 21, 2014

I spent on average 10+ hours every two weeks on each assignment. The course material was challenging, but Dr. Zach and his TAs made it clear. Dr. Zach is extremely helpful and very knowledgeable. Attend the PASS sessions and go to office hours. He's much less intimidating when you speak to him alone. Exams were tricky but not worth much.

5.0
4.0
PHIL579
Grade: A
May 8, 2018
Would take again

Dr. Zach is clearly the best! I'm sure that necessarily at least 25% of the class was in love with him and for good reason.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
5.0
5.0
PHIL479
Grade: A
Mar 2, 2019
Would take again

Incredibly difficult small problems that will have you pouring over the free textbook that he wrote for hours with classmates. He'll basically confirm whether the answer is right or not before you turn it in but you really gotta work for it.

Respected
Get ready to read
Caring
5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Nov 4, 2019
Would take again

Great professor, very professional. Posts all notes online (great notes), and also provides a free textbook. The quizzes are somewhat time-consuming considering they're only worth 0.5% each, but other than that this course and prof are amazing.

Respected
Participation matters
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Grade: A-
Dec 6, 2019
Would take again

The work load for this class is moderate. A 10 question multiple choice a week. 4 longer assignments over the semester (4-8hours ea.) and two tests, a mid term and in class final. The grading for the assignments was electronic and couldn't be submitted if it was wrong. The class has been changed drastically since previous years. Much easier.

4.0
3.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Dec 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Zach is one of the most professional professors I've had at this university. The problem sets (worth 50%) can take a lot of time to do outside of class, but most of them are marked online so feedback is pretty instant. Wouldn't take this course again because it was only a requirement for my degree, but Zach is a solid choice here.

Lots of homework
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Apr 20, 2020
Would take again

If you have to take PHIL 279, this is the professor you want to have. When he teaches ,he is straight to the point and very specific for people to understand and gives good examples. This course is not easy though. Prepare to work hard no matter what prof you get but if you could choose, go with Zach.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
3.0
5.0
PHIL279
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 13, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Prof is fine, I'm here to leave a review of the course. DO NOT TAKE PHIL279. IT IS THE WORST COURSE YOU CAN POSSIBLY TAKE. YOU DON'T GET INTO THE HARD MATERIAL UNTIL AFTER THE DROP DATE. CARNAP IS GARBAGE. THIS COURSE BELONGS IN MATH NOT PHILOSOPHY. THERE IS VERY LITTLE ACTUAL PHILOSOPHY INVOLVED IN IT.

Lots of homework
5.0
4.0
PHILI279
Oct 15, 2020
Would take again

Most caring prof I have ever had, provides good understanding of the material through lectures. Gives specific chapters to read for each unit, along with slides, and extra videos. Wants every to student to succeed and gives you a fair chance to do so.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Caring
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Grade: A+
Dec 9, 2020
Would take again

Remember it's a Logic course, not a Philosophy course. However, I really enjoyed the content, and Dr Zach played a huge role in that. His passion for Logic shone through in every pre-recorded lecture and synchronous meeting, and he was very fair in his grading, going back to change grading scales if he felt they were too hard after the fact. 11/10

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Grade: A+
Dec 15, 2020
Would take again

A very kind man. Best prof I've had so far.

Respected
Accessible outside class
Caring
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Grade: A-
Dec 17, 2020
Would take again

Dr. Zach is an amazing professor who truly cares for the success of his students. His grading system is very fair and he gives multiple chances to students to do better. Lectures are engaging and he is always there to help you along the way. Loved doing this course with Dr. Zach. 100% recommend.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Dec 18, 2020
Would take again

Dr. Zach is easily the best professor I have had thus far in university. He cares so much and does his very best to provide as much help as he can. This course is very hard I think and having him definitely helped!

Lots of homework
Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Grade: B
Dec 19, 2020
Would take again

Honestly one of the best profs, especially during the pandemic. Super understanding and VERY fair. Logic is a hard course but he genuinely made it as simple as he could and took his student's feedback and made changes when needed. If you need to take Logic, try getting Zach.

5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 21, 2021
Would take again

I am speechless, this professor has blown me away. If you have a question he will help you out and has adapted to online learning so well. I would definitely love to have him as my prof again. By far the best prof I have had so far.

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Grade: A+
Mar 25, 2021
Would take again

Incredible prof. Clearly explains topics in notes and lectures, provides open-source textbook. Grading is on a strange scale that ultimately assesses understanding, extra attempts are given on a token system and anyone who takes the time to understand the content will be given enough time and attempts to succeed.

Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
4.0
PHILI279
Grade: B+
Apr 5, 2021
Would take again

Dr Richard is a real gem. PHIL279 is a fairly difficult course but he makes it simple for all the students. Also he is accessible outside of the classroom, he was the most helpful professor I've ever had!

Lots of homework
Accessible outside class
Caring
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Apr 9, 2021
Would take again

This material can be pretty tough, but the prof keeps the difficulty reasonable and teaches the material very well. The class is super organized and it is in the student's control to get the mark they want. Work hard and put lots of time into the course and you'll do well. The PASS sessions along with the tutorial sessions are super helpful!

Respected
Accessible outside class
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Apr 10, 2021
Would take again

Great professor! He covers the content in pretty decent depth, gives a ton of practice, and even does a bunch of examples during lecture time. The workload gets fairly heavy if you fall behind just a bit tho. I'm pretty awful with allocating specific amounts of time to specific courses, so my advice is to manage your time well with this course.

Lots of homework
Caring
5.0
3.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Apr 18, 2021
Would take again

Not gonna say much that hasn't already been said by others lol. Long story short, Zach's a cool guy, hella assignments, and hard content but delivered well. Word of advice though, PRACTICE THE HECK OUTTA THEM PROOFS!

Lots of homework
Accessible outside class
Caring
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Apr 29, 2021
Would take again

Amazing prof. Difficult course, but provides many resources for you to succeed, given that you are willing to put in the work. Clearly cares about his students, and was exceptionally understanding during the pandemic.

Lots of homework
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Grade: A+
May 4, 2021
Would take again

Okay, so how we were graded was very new to me. It wasn't the normal "get a c- overall and you pass" but rather how many individual criteria you passed that counted which I think is actually better honestly. So basically, to get an 80 you'd have to get 80% on 80%of the quizzes/assignments. He was so so great! He was understanding and available.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
5.0
4.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Dec 31, 2021
Would take again

Amazing prof. Genuinely cares about students. Take this class online if you can, he wants to help you succeed and will offer many chances. Has a different grading criteria but I actually preferred it. Attend office hours, ask for help when possible. He really does want to see you succeed and help to make it possible. Actually implements feedback.

Gives good feedback
Lots of homework
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL279
Grade: A
Jan 11, 2022
Would take again

Really nice guy. Sort of an odd grading scheme so make sure you fully understand how your mark is determined. Course content gradually gets more difficult and can be quite challenging towards the end. If you attend his lectures and use his (free) textbook you should be able to easily get an A.

Gives good feedback
Lots of homework
Amazing lectures
5.0
5.0
PHIL279
Grade: A+
Feb 1, 2022
Would take again

This was a difficult course, but there is no one better to teach it than Proffessor Zach. He is very passionate about logic and will make sure that everyone in the class is following along to what he's saying. He's not a harsh grader; his main goal is simply that everyone understands the content. 10/10 would recommend!!

Respected
Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

95% confidence
Based on 20 grades
Most common grades:
A (10)
A+ (5)
A- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 22 reported grades
A: 10
A+: 5
A-: 3
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Caring (13)
Lots of homework (10)
Respected (6)
Clear grading criteria (6)
Gives good feedback (5)
Accessible outside class (5)
Amazing lectures (4)
Participation matters (3)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.23 avg change
Mar
Apr
May
Dec
Jan
Feb
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

279

5.0

(3)

PJYL279

5.0

(1)

PHIL579

5.0

(1)

PHIL479

5.0

(1)

PHILI279

4.7

(3)
+5 more courses
Difficulty by Course

LOGIC1

5.0

PHIL479

5.0

PHIL415

4.0

PHIL579

4.0

PHIL279

3.4

Similar Professors