3.3
Quality3.2
Difficulty36%
Would Retake327
Reviews36%
Would Retake
327
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
327 total ratings5
108
4
61
3
58
2
59
1
41
What Students Say
“Also you only really need the Commit Sociology books”
SOC101Y1 - 2.0 rating“Not approachable at all”
SOC100 - 2.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
47%
Textbook Required
83%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.45 avg changeRatings by Course
107
5.0
(1)SOCIOLOGY
5.0
(2)SOC1011998
5.0
(1)SOCOLOGY
5.0
(1)SOC212
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
101Y
5.0
INTOTOSOCI
5.0
SOCSECT
5.0
SOS101
4.5
SOC
4.5
Reviews (297)
Brym takes the TTC!! Wow!! He really DOES care about the environment!!
Horribly dogmatic (re: sociology & his course); rather repetitive, too
kewl prof, interesting class, can get an A if u read the text &attend lectures!
Loved this class. Great teacher, one of my favs. Made me go into Sociology.
very cocky prof. tests were written very unfairly, they were way too specific!
FANTASTIC PROF
the course could have been more interesting if the prof wasn't boring.
great
Tests are hard, he is good but way to cocky
cocky, repetitive (lectures=readings), testing method is absurd
boring and didactic, his class was huge and he handled it badly.
Interesting and dynamic professor
An awful, awful man.
interesting material, but he regurgitates the text in lectures. kinda cocky
extremely interesting
He did NOT lecture from the book. Those who say he did must have got F.
totally hot
JAR OF PEPPERS!
Terrible Prof, attitude problem - new text every 2 yrs to make $$ off students
reads his notes all class, ...EZ to sleep in class
personally, i think hes funny and very knowledgeable... kind of im right but..
why does he try to be cool?
No Comments
100% multi. coice tests - always against the student!
I found out that sociology was more than this!
very interesting lectures, however he can be bias at times
he's alright. speaking to 1500 students ain't easy.
Boring Lectures,
interesting lectures, intelligent prof, love this class
how can you respect a guy who makes you buy his text book and then reads from it
Great sense of humour, interesting material, fair tests, approachable...
He's a pretty decent professor, but he is too high on himself & has too much ego
BORING, he barks at students (cellphones) he's rude and against us mark wise
drop this course b/c of him...wasted of money and time
Unhelpful, egotistical, and biased.
2 words: boring and egotistical
I have not been class in months becuase I fall asleep to the sound of that man's voice.....thank god his tests are so easy and there are summaries available online for his text book.
writes his own book EVERY YEAR, killed me and my brothers, what to do with the books?
great course, great prof
Managed a 1500 person class well. His knowledge and enthusiasm for sociology was really absorbed by the students.
Good course, a real eye-opener. I thought Brym taught it pretty well too, though the tests stressed too much memorization as opposed to understanding.
Really opened my eyes. The material covered is excellent ! I sometimes feel that the lectures do not add so much to the material in the book. Very good lecturer, good sense of humour. Very happy I took this course.
i liked the prof, but the material covered was a bit basic/self-evident.
very clear, articulate. Soc 101 gave me a very different way at looking at macro situational factors, as well as how to analyze them. would definately retake.
Prof. Brym has made learning about sociology fun and interesting. I would highly recommend anyone who is interested in learning about how the world works to take this course.
He's a really good professor and the lectures are really interesting.
Has very interesting examples and knows how to teach the basics of sociology
great!!!
great prof!
No Comments
No Comments
Outstanding, intelligent Prof. Best first-year course. No regrets.
Wonderful speaker, could have been a politician in another life . . .
Loved sociology. Everybody should have to take it... makes better people. Brym lectures very well but is not the most helpful. Overall a great course.
Interesting and informative course.
No Comments
He teaches well but everything is so scripted. He reads off his notes at the podium as if he wouldn't know what to say if he didn't have those aids. I don't like listening to his lectures, they put me to sleep.
Excellent professor. The class really changed my perspective on our world.
Helpful anytime I needed it. Updates course website frequently. Lectures are structured very well. Perhaps a list of the major points and objectives of the lecture at the beginning would be helpful. Excellent!
Egotistical, rude, and unhelpful. Tests less about knowing the material and more about tricking the students.
Why did I even bother taking this course?. Didn't like it one bit. I mean come on, all 100% multiple choice tests and exam? Pretty uselss i must say...
Professor Brym makes my day!!!!!!!!!
lectured (boringly) straight out of his text book and so most of the material could be learned by reading the text book. very egotistical, and presented tests which seemed to be more about trick questions, than actual test of knowledge
GOod Professor but EXTREMELY rude and arrogant. He insulted a cab driver in front of 1500 people when I took this course four years ago.
Easiest course in the world. Anyone who says otherwise is in for a surprise in second year. Very helpful and gave clear answers. But the material is so self explanatory, you'd have to born under a rock to not ace this course.
Prof. Brym is a great teacher, but what he says in class, you could highlight in your book and take little notes on the side for his "in class" questions on mid-terms. Loved the course, though.
for the massive size of the class (1500 students) he did an impressive job.
No Comments
He lectures in a clear and concise manner which makes it easy to follow and understand.Really enjoy the course.Can follow a lot from experience probably because I'm older than the majority.AND I don't think he's bad looking contrary to one comment on here
I switched my sociology class to be in Professor Brym's class. I think he's an excellent professor, and really makes the Con Hall experience worthwhile. He is very organized.. and this shows up in my note-taking as well.
He is clear, straightforward, modern, and in touch with his students. His lectures are now fair and informing. GO BRYM GO
boo brym boo! man, can't the guy slow down just a little during his lectures? who wants to listen to 2 hours of boring speed talking on tape at home?
after 2 horrible, stupid tests, i absolutely hate this course. the textbook, which Brym wrote himself, is horribly unclear and unbelievable boring. trying to read it is tedious in itself. listening to his equally unclear lectures is also a pain in da ass
for classes of the given size, he's incredibly caring and responsive... lectures can get boring, but the book is ALWAYS boring!
How hard is it to just talk slower? Lectures were organized but boring, basically an oral text book. For some reason he didn't like it when pple got up (to pee/leave) when he's talking. Guess he needed the view of a full auditorium for his ego.
I have enjoyed professor bryms's class greatly. The material and the way it is presented makes it a very interesting and enjoyable class.
he's not bad but the book is boring like hell and he wrote it and his tests are freaking HARD you gota read all the details in the book for the tests...can't skip anything...
Prof. Brym is a great lecturer. He has a very unique point of view in many things. I like his clarity in expressing his views. Also, he's helped me learn a lot about life and understand the world better, which is beneficial for life!
No Comments
soc101 is an enlightening course. i feel i'm learning a lot of a relevent material in the course, and it's certainly changing my perspective on society. i wish it would focus more on primary teachings, rather than sec., but it's still a good soc. intro
if i had a choice, i would drop the damn ****ing course. i learned absolutely nothing new in it
He is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad! We're talking about bad cubed. He is totally boring and will put you to sleep in a matter of milliseconds. He so egotistical too. Get a clue Sherlock-you're not!
I'd rather listen for two hours to a telephone pole. That pole could make me learn more material in one class than he could in a dozen. His tests are idiotic and his classes are too (not to mention the prof himself)
A class preview- go into class and hear blah blah blah blah me blah blah blah blah more me blah blah blah blah wonderful me blah blah blah I luv me blah blah blah....(it goes on forever nonstop). At least his class gets you a good nap for the day.
No Comments
it's not really sociology than philosophy of prof. brym. a very boring lecturer who basically repeats most of what is already in the readings without much clarification. he also wrote the text which is extremely long winded and unnecessary.
This class is Propaganda Central.
In a word........BAD! Avoid is course at all possible costs! If in his course, avoid life sucking lectures.
Worst Professor ever....DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE! If you like talking in class forget about it because he will stop lecturing and pick you out of a crowd of 1500 students and yell at you for talking...he is the worst...so boring
like his lectures, hate his pride and stubborness, sociology man! show some mercy! unless you're a hypocrite.
Bad. Just plain bad. Did not like the course. I was thinking about majoring in sociology, but not anymore. He ruined it.
No Comments
People give him a hard time, I think he's a good lecturer. Any guy who is good at talking to that many people is going to be slightly full of himmself. and the class is not that hard.
No Comments
Brym is an amazing lecturer. He lays out the major points of each topic very clearly and provides helpful lecture notes on the website. He speaks at a good pace that one can easily take notes at. My only beef is that the tests are insanely specific.
great
a student's interest in a subject is TOTALLY based on the students 1st tutor! If you would give me a SOC textbook only, i wud NEVER have taken the initiative in the subject, but prof. brym made me love sociology! prof. brym is an awsome professor!
lectures were easy to follow...material was organized and structured...approachable...website was ALWAYS up-to-date...readings were relevant to real-life issues and interesting...clear speaker.
Prof Brym is an amazing teacher. He speaks with charisma and enthusiasm! He is very approachable and communicates well with all. His website is one of the best maintained of all UofT professors! Tests are not hard--this is UofT; not high school!
dropped course after 4 lectures. thinks he knows everything - but doesnt. he should loosen up a bit.
excellent
Very tough course, interesting but tonnes of readings and difficult material.
Exams are hard and focus on very specific details; really have to know your stuff upside down. Good prof.
Amazing prof. One of the best profs at U of T. His website is amazing. He gives sample questions. The course is not easy, really have to keep up with the readings and UNDERSTAND the stuff. But this prof is one of the better profs I've had at U of T
Mostly a very interesting lecturer, can drone on at times. Very interesting presentation of course material, but know your stuff!The tests are ridiculous!
Excellent proffessor. A leader in his field.
Lectures are always well organized and coherent. His explanations are easy to understand and he speaks at a good pace and repeats important concepts so you dont have to worry about missing things from a lecture. course website useful and up to date. fair tests, nice guy, fun to learn. best prof.
Had this prof 7yrs ago as my very first lecturer. Very knowledgeable friendly and impressive in the way he lectures. I think he is an inspiring teacher to have and would recommend him to anyone considering soc as for tests talk to your ta's things can be managed!
i honestly have to say that he is the wrost prof. ever. he is condescending, arrogant and rude. not to mention that he calls his students liars, when they face him with the reality that he is the one not telling the truth.
For those of you who are into marxism and communism this course is for you. There is an incredible bias in this class and offers no real indication of anything possitive to take from sociology
man he's tough!!!
Very hard course
Dr. Brym is an amazing prof. His textbook is well written yet some chapters difficult to understand. His tests are really fair and questions straight out of the book. You just have to read the chapters several times to absorb all the information. He replies quick if you send him email.
great prof. probably one of the best courses at u of t. brym is one of the best public speakers i've known. the course is easy to do well in as long as you do the readings.
Brym knows his stuff but makes the tests challenging. It's a great course and the book of articles that accompany the studies was VERY interesting. I'll probably continue to make SOC at least a minor and take something of his in the future.
No Comments
worst prof ever and extremley dry. He acts very cocky and he has no time for any questions or extra help.
Prof Brym is the best prof at U of T
excellent prof, but I hated the course.
Dr. Brym is a wonderful prof. He is very interested in his field and gives great lectures. It is very possible to get good grades in his class if you spend sometime studying sociology everyday. If you leave the readings till just before a test, you will either fail or get a bad mark. The tests are a little challenging, but not unfair by any means.
He started the semester by saying... "If you want to do well in this class you will 1) record all the classes and make detailed notes 2) do all the readings (incidentally he authored the text) 3)review the material every day" Very cocky, talks down to the students.
excellent!
I'm an Engineering Student (ELEC OT5 + PEY), SOC101 was an elective I took, and man is that junk boring. Don't take his course as an elective. I have never taken a course as useless as SOC101!
Very pompous and cocky.
Great lecturer. Very clear, slow speaker, and easy to approach.
first rate
I think he was first-rate, indeed. I mean obviously the guy's intelligent because he WROTE THE BOOK on Sociology, literally! Good text, great lectures, and like someone else said, he explained things slowly to that we could fully understand the concepts. I suppose that's why he was a little tough on the tests! Good guy though :)
Totally hard, multiple choice was horrible
Great course and prof.
Tests were multiple choice, testing on your memorization of minor details in text and lectures. He drones on and on. I don't recommend taking him, but it may be inevitable.
Needs another method of testing because multiple choice just doesnt really reflect a student's learning.
No Comments
Not a good professor. The multiple choice tests focus on minor detail and do not effectively test a students knowledge. The lectures were not engaging, the professor loses focus easily, the use of TA's was non existent and the prof was not really approchable. Alot of people failed by a marginal percentage.
Very interesting course, well taught.
He wrote the textbooks we're using and one of them is just articles... which we rarely discuss in class.
He is an excellent public speaker!!! And his textbook was well written... Critisims: he is quit bias and does not have a complete understanding of science. He could use a biology course or two. Also, do not take this course is you are a visual learner..he does not put anything up on the sides except graphs..which also makes the class hard to follow
Has written an amazing textbook for the course, very easy read with numerous interesting facts. Readings are very insightful. Lectures are boring, doesn't speak with enthusiasm but he cannot be blamed. He has been teaching the course for 3 years. Tip: Ask a friend to record the lecture for you.
-doesn't stutter in his lectures, they're well rehearsed, very interactive with the class
No Comments
his tests are deadly
Great webpage. Used more slides in lecture after students requested he do so. Other than main textbook the clicker/softcover and workbook not necessary. The $190.00 price could be reduced by not incorporating these. Prof. has socialist bias, very left wing. Huge amount of reading. Multiple choice and essay que. on test very difficult. Ave. mark = C
Great
Great professor. Confident, clear. Wrote the textbook, which is fantastic. Covered great depth and breadth of material. Responded to and encouraged student feedback on his performance. Good use of powerpoint slides. Very fair testing!
One of the most fair profs of U of T. A rare thing. All you need to do is, KEEP UP WITH THE READINGS...Study sociology every weekend...read the chapter like 3 or 4 times and not leave the reading till the weekend b4 the test, and there is no reason why you should get less than B in the course. Tests are slightly tough, but totally fair. Great prof
I came into the class with high expectations and I did not leave disappointed! Professor Brym is one of the most articulate, intelligent and helpful professors out there and he has always delivered his lectures with passion, interest and just a simple love for job. This course was a great experience and I recommenend it to all first-years.
A very smart professor. However, these needs to be a drastic audit on the methods of evaluation. There should be tutorials, no excuse. BIO150 with comparable size had them. Often, lectures were very dry and simply from the text. TA's not approachable, and useless at times. Monotonous at times. My overall grade for Brym is a c-
Brym is an amazing professor. He is clear about all information needed for tests and exams. He is very passionate about the subject and he makes you want to learn. I would definitly take his class again!!
His lectures are boring and so is the textbook. I could not understand the material nor analyze it correctly. His lectures and material are dry and not interesting. The tests are multiple choice and have some essay questions-extremely hard and detailed. I wish I would have dropped the course sooner or I shouldn't have took the course as an elective
Terrible lectures, tearfully boring subject matter. I took this course as a mandatory social science credit because I didn't have to write essays for it. Brym has below average intelligence and struggles with the simple math required for things like interest calculations
Amazing prof!! makes the subject matter interesting and easy to understand!!
Overall not bad. The lectures were LARGELY based on the textbooks, and at times it was tediously repetitive. Exams were almost identical to previous years exams, and tested strictly from material in the text with a few questions based on the material from the lectures thrown in. Easy mark for a social science credit.
awesome prof!
Good Prof
Take this course! The best Prof.
awsome class
very interesting!!
Great!
Good course, great professor.
WONDERFUL CLASS AND YOU NEVER FEEL HIS BIG CLASSES, VERY PASSIONATE, CAREFUL PROF ABOUT THE STUDENTS,I learned many life lessons from his class, exteremely punctual, organized, kind prof, extermely well presentor, very helpful for ESL students, don't miss his classes I wish I had more classes with him
amazing prof! very interesting,very clear! if you're taking sociology at UofT, make sure it's with him!
Attendance in lectures is a must. Overall, content was interesting and very applicable to life. Tests were difficult but if you follow his advice: look at past tests, use online resources, it helps tremendously.
Robert Brym is an excellent professor
As a 2nd year engineer taking this as an elective, SOC 101 wasn't a big priority but it's a year course worth double weight for the GPA after semester 2 so I buckled down, did the readings on the weekend prior to the lecture and bam, 90+. Easy mark, interesting course, take it seriously and you won't regret it.
Good, and engaging speaker. However he is pretty biased. Every topic covered centered around how material inequality is the root of all society's problems. Made it sound like the rational and moral thing to do is increase taxes and make more attempts to help the poor. Although I guess that's what sociology is so I can't blame him.
His style of teaching is absolutly impressive. So clear, not boring at all, makes a class of 1400 seem like 140. Definatly a must take class, i only took it for a social science and i ended up majoring in SOC cuz of him!
He's a great prof who can gets his point across to you clearly, although I would say some of the question he ask on the test is a bit too detail which I find it difficult (such as asking for number of years and number of %)
Brym changed my life... Without him, I honestly think that I would have completely hated my first year of University.. I would take another course offered by him in a heartbeat.. Wish him the very best
Brym is a great prof. He's very organized, clear and articulate. Overall a good learning experience. However, I seriously think the prof should reassess his evaluation methods. Sometimes his MC tests were too hard, asking specific percentage changes etc. Dont take his class if you plan to get a high grade without putting "A LOT" of effort.
A bit tough, but do it right and you're gonna be OK. Go through the readings carefully, a lot of the questions are on specific details.
I didnt really like him. Knew his stuff but made the subject really boring. Arrogant and strict. dude needs to chill out.
I really liked the course I had with him and I found his lectures clear and easy to follow. I liked his style of teaching as well... overall very good prof and course!
yummy
great teacher! funny and easy to understand! great intro course!
So full of himself.
Attending lectures and reading all the assigned chapters is crucial. He likes to ask random, small details that can be easily overlooked so read everything with high understanding. His tests are harder than the subject material demands. Many questions tend to be "trick" questions. Overall, it's a difficult intro course & Brym is strict & uptight!
AWESOME! Repeats arguments and supports twice which is extremely helpful(if you're a slow typer/writer like me) Engaging. High textbook use which i see as a good thing because I don't want to waste my hard earned money especially when I only make minimum wage.
read the textbook!!!!!!!!!!!!! his tests are hard but not totally impossible...this course is a difficult first year course that i recommend to those who are willing to work very hard! overall grade for Prof Brym: C
I refuse to study from a chart of data issued fifteen years ago. Professor Brym is the equivalent to American Fox News; overly dramatic anecdotes mixed in with questionable facts and a delusional sense of self. The fact that he has won a teaching award this year is laughable. I could hear snoring from the balconies of Convocation Hall every class.
Although the lectures are organized, I was not fully convinced with all the facts he was presenting. Read the text more than once and it's useful if you record the lectures. If I could take it again, I don't think I would but that's probably because of my general dislike for the subject. Be prepared for no breaks.
This class wasn't too hard. Just read the txtbook and attend class and you're good to go. But there were a lot of things he presented in class that I didn't agree on.
Brym is one of the worst professors I've ever had. His lectures and his textbook is full of ridiculous pseudo-science. He doesn't even have an elementary grasp of statistics. He's pompous and obnoxious. He needs a reality check and a new line of work.
He made this class awful. He uses old data and his opinions are questionable. Don't talk in class. He incited an all out riot when he refused to continue teaching because a student was talking.
Professor Brym is good at explaining concepts and he is pretty clear with his ideas. However, he is not a nice person and he doesn't care about his students. He is stuck up and has an ego the size of Russia.
Lectures proved long and difficult to engage with as the course progressed. States concepts with clearity and straight forward examples. His respect for students and acceptance to critisism is questionable. He will ask things from lectures on exams...otherwize, lectures are not critical for success.
I actually really liked Brym. I found him interesting and his teaching style is very straightforward. I became interested in Sociology because of him, so I worked hard and got a good mark in this course. If you go to all the lectures, do your reading and study you'll be fine.
a very interesting and engaging professor
Very hard class. Couldn't figure out what 25% of 1000 was! Inequality is fascinating. Can't get enough of tax redistribution and inequality. Sociology rocks!!!! I died laughing when he "accidentally" said scam instead of tax!
Brym is definitely one of my favorite profs :)
EXCELLENT PROFESSOR. MADE ME FALL IN LOVE WITH SOCIOLOGY. HE IS EXTREMELY SERIOUS, AND MIGHT SEEM UNAPPROACHABLE HOWEVER, HE IS REALLY NICE. HIS BOOKS ARE AMAZING, HE IS THE MOST INTELLIGENT PERSON I HAVE COME ACROSS. BY THE WAY, FOR THE PEOPLE THINKING OF TAKING SOC101 (THINKING THAT IT WILL BE EASY) YOU ARE SADLY MISTAKEN!!:)
Brym was one of my favorite prof. in my first year. His lectures were well organized and well presented. If you do your readings and attend lectures (take a look at past tests too!), you can get an A like i did :)
extremely important to do readings and make notes - saves a lot of time and energy before soc tests and bound to do well. prof was amazing lecturer - very organized and good use of powerpoints. extremely knowledgeable about material and engaging. great class for 1st years!
theres obviously a reason why he's got the most people rating him. Great prof!!
Really great lecturer. Recycles material from his own textbook (New Society) and the little book (SLDI). Don't buy the clicker, it's not necessary. Just READ the textbook and make good notes at lectures.
Egotistical, dull as nails lecturer. If you want to do well, take this class. If you want to learn something you didn't already know, there are much better options out there.
Although his lecture are quite redundant at times, he's a good teacher. His tests revolve around definitions to the textbook to which he is the author, so if you read the textbook, you'll do well. Never have I gone to ask him for help, and thats because everything is so clear that I was rarely ever confused of the class content! Great Proff.
Ok, Brym is a really intelligent, precise prof. I found his lectures very interesting and stimulating. One of the only classes where i didnt find myself restlessly waiting for the 2 hours to end, it went by pretty quickly. I think he's a great prof, great guy, knows his stuff and is passionate about it.
Terrible professor. Sometimes seems to struggle with basic statistics. Points often fail to stand up to basic scrutiny. He also has an exceptionally slimy way of milking textbook money from students, even for a prof.
This is not an easy class. He will trick you with some pretty tough MC questions. Read the text CAREFULLY and more than once. The tests can require some serious, sometimes philosphical, application of course material.
Avoid this class if you can. I mean, Professor Brym is great. But, way too much material is covered on his tests. Some questions, no matter how carefully you read the book you will never get. Really have a solid understanding of core concepts to do well in this course.
He's brilliant, kind, and intelligent. He made me fall in love with Sociology and I'm always thankful to him.
There's a lot of ambivalence towards Brym as a lecturer and a lot of that stems from the fact that there are 2 kinds of people who take this course: those who want a credit, and those who are actually interested. If you are actually interested in sociology, you'll do well. If you're not, this course can be brutal. Do the readings and you'll be fine
I am absolutely shocked by all these negative comments. Professor Brym's lectures are straightforward and interesting. He is very well-spoken! The course isn't the easiest, but if you actually engage in this class through taking notes and doing the readings you will earn the credit while having learned something of practical importance. Brym <3!
Lectures were sometimes interesting in content but delivery was monotone, repetitive and usually pretty boring. Very textbook-based; making notes on the readings will guarantee you a good grade. No major assignments; just three term tests (all MCQ) and an exam. All in all a decent prof who could definitely use some charisma/ sense of humour.
This is an easy, straightforward course as long as you stay awake during lectures. Brym is an extremely boring professor whose unfounded arrogance is sometimes appalling. However, the course material is easy to master. Textbook readings are key; Brym follows them closely during his lecture. All in all, its a course that isn't difficult.
Considering the authorship on the texts used in class, and the consistent assertion that only sociology answers the pressing questions underlying other disciplines such as economics, philosophy, science etc., it seemed much of the material in the course was aimed at recruitment into the field of sociology. A bit dubious on the data at times also
Course is really easy. I wouldn't recommend going to class, All he does is read off the book he wrote. I don't like the guy, I feel like he was rude to me because of my background, from what I hear though, hes like that to everyone. These views are based on my experience with the guy, you may have a different experience. *shrugs* not a fan.
What a course! What a prof! This course got me into sociology. Brym is clear, concise, straight to the point. It's an intro course, so of course you will use your textbook a lot. He DOES put info into lectures that is NOT found in the textbook, and he DOES use it in tests. This course opened my eyes and my mind.
A very smug and arrogant man. He is a great professor though and his tests are very easy. Professor Brym has a strong left-wing bias. He seems to despise everything that Canada stands for. He spends half the class preaching on how sentences should be reduced for criminals and the other half idolizing the Swedish welfare system.
Excellent in all respects.
Multiple choice exams can be tricky but study and understand the textbook material and you'll be fine. Brym explains things well.
He tended to teach the heavier topics, but honestly I found him a good professor. You realize how passionate he is in sociology when you get to talk to him. You should go to lectures, he discusses different things in them. It's memorization for the most part, read the textbook and go to lecture and you'll be fine!
textbook very hard to understand and tests the class on the littlest details like stats and numbers. very little understanding of the course material even though i did all the readings and attended all lectures
Brym made material that could have been interesting very boring.
Don't recommend. Tests are tough. Brym is boring. First lecture was on suicide! Adam Green was fine though. Very weird class.
very organized and an overall good professor
Professor Brym made me want to specialize in Sociology. I loved his lectures. I loved talking to him in person. He is great. The people in my class who didn't like him were slackers looking for an easy mark. If you want to actually learn, you should take his class.
He's knowledgable about the topic but can be very rude when answering questions. The data he uses are all outdated and the tests are brutal since it asks about the tiny statistical details. Not approachable at all
His classes were pretty boring and repetitive. He taught every other lecture and another professor would teach the other lectures. The other professor was better. Pretty tough tests, as all Sociology tests are. They are always worded confusingly. Read the textbook weekly and you'll get a B or B+
AMAZING PROF!!!
Textbooks are very difficult to understand. Uses his own textbook of course and replaces them very frequently. Perhaps, consideration to students' finance as opposed to his own would make him more popular among students. Tests are VERY difficult. More problematic, don't think he's the one that actually write them.
always brings graphs and charts in every possible topic! this isn't a math course!!!
Went off on his own tangents and would always use charts and graphs in class. It was kind of hard to follow along.
Overall just kind of... boring. Most lectures are summarizing the readings (from his own books that are expensive) and brings up quantitative stuff constantly. If you go to a lecture he teaches, everyone around you will be playing solitaire or on Facebook, you can stay home if he's teaching. Also you only really need the Commit Sociology books.
Brym covers the research aspects of sociology, mainly math, and as a social science student it isn't exactly my strong suit, and its confusing to follow. Tells funny jokes occasionally. But make sure you really pay attention to his information, because reading the textbook for his sections does not help, and his section of the test is rough.
He tends to go very in depth on every topic and sometimes loses the interest of people in lectures. However, I found all of his lectures interesting, and very easy to understand. The math components are simple multiplication or division. Overall I do not understand the negativity most students have towards him.
Brym is an awesome speaker. His lectures are very in depth and his arguments are always strong. His lectures are very emotional (which made me feel angry and unjustified about social issues). He uses the most recent eventsnews to explain sociology concepts. Brym does not read off the slides. He teaches students to interpret data and graphs.
His questions on tests are harder than caron's. He's pretty interesting though, and I like his statistics and real life examples; in comparison with caron, who is much more definitionalby the book. I think the two complement each other well. Caron makes things cleareasier as a course coordinator; Brym's lectures are very goodinteresting.
I love this Professor's class! He is the best ever. Really easy and he explains everything until you understand. He understands when you have emergencies and he gives extra credit. His class will be the only class you will really learn while having an easy A. I Strongly recommend him for everyone!!!!
He makes a ridiculous sum of money for shelling his own books and keeps making new editions to get more money. You are cattle to Brym.
His lectures are well-prepared and though the subject matter is a bit dull, he usually offers some really interesting insights on it that make you think a little harder than Caron's lectures do. I actually really enjoyed reading his mini-textbook , which you definitely need to read thoroughly for his questions on the tests.
boring
Had him my freshman year. Interesting class. Some of the lectures wound up to be total snoozefests (not to take anything away from the man's teaching ability). However I love the fact that he incorporated individual wireless remotes for all students when conducting the occasional class survey.
Do not take his class unless you're okay with him misinterpreting every single religious book out there with as little context possible. He says his opinions as if they are facts and it's annoying.
I found him to be thoroughly exceptional! He has been consistently clear, reasonable and totally supportive of his students. The lectures are definitely mandatory, but very easy to keep up with, and an easy A if you put in a little bit of effort. Plus, he's been sending out funny clips to keep us light-hearted and happy, just a WHOLESOME MAN.
He is one of the most understanding professors and really cares for his students.
His lectures are dry and he tries to present his opinions as facts. Although he does some interesting videos in class. He also makes you buy his textbooks and updates them every year, so you cannot buy it used. Most of the test questions come the textbooks. His tests are not hard if you took notes on the lectures and textbook.
He isn't a bad prof necessarily, but he just doesn't make effort to make his lectures interesting. Each slide has like 100 words on it and people tend to either not show up or fall asleep. Also his test were heavy on the textbook and barely anything from lectures
Hi everyone. Brym is a passionate about what he teaches. He's a nice guy honestly and is quite fair overall. Lectures are a bit old school (powerpoint, etc.) but includes lots of present day topics which is interesting. Heavy reading; not a bird course. Most kids don't study and them complain after the midterm (all multiple choice essentially).
Really boring and his teaching skill is not good
Most of the work's reading the textbook. His tests were ok, could be fairer. He states too much of his political, national, and social opinions in the textbook and his slides which can be annoying. most of it is Canadian history and some stuff regarding international history is very euphemistic and innacurate which is offensive
Hated this class. His tests were all mc but SO HARD!! The class average was very low (60s) and he tells you that. He reads straight off powerpoints. He is very knowledgable however, but the tests were way too hard. Never has anything you are told to study. WOULD NOT TAKE THIS CLASS WITH HIM!
The content of the class is really interesting and Prof. Brym is incredibly passionate. I'd be more eager to learn and participate if the readings weren't unbearably dense and he actually talked about things on the quizzes. Low average (not a brag). Very intelligent guy. Cool lectures. Assessments are awful.
Not accessible, Vague tests and expects students to buy his books. Not caring about student needs or health at best. At least his recorded lecs have music tho. Mediocre at best
Very kind prof who does a great job incorporating contemporary issues into lectures. He genuinely cares about his students and their experience in the class. Reading the other comments, I can't agree that there is that much reading. Very average amount for a 100-level course. Reach out to him if you ever need anything, he'll do his best to help u!
One of the best and sweetest professors I have had this semester! He always included interesting/contemporary information and songs in his recorded lectures. The tests were reasonable and test book heavy, so make sure you do all the readings and write notes. His study guides are really helpful for tests too and I would take a class with him again:)
He's a nice guy and the quizzes were straightforward and fair. His material is more on the statistical side and application rather than sociological concepts and memorizing. Lots of reading. Readings are probably important for the midterm and final which were a bit more difficult than the quizzes. Overall good class, good prof.
I'm pretty sure this guy is too old to still be teaching. For every e-mail he sends he has to send two follow-up e-mails because he messed something up or missed something. Makes you spend money during a pandemic for a textbook he wrote and updates just enough that you can't use last year's. Doesn't care and isn't accommodating. Good luck.
Took SOC100 with him, and it was awful. Our final exam was nothing like any of the content we did, we were tested on the most random, and menial facts from more than 500 pages of readings, and that does not include lectures. This class will not teach you sociology, and its uses. It will teach you how to memorize every little detail. DO NOT TAKE IT.
the worst class I've taken so far. the wording of his tests and quizzes are brutal. cant seem to tell what his intentions are. the class average is low overall, if he was going to do an online course with no open sources at least allow the students to go over his work. WEBCAM MICROPHONE TEXTBOOK is a must (online). very old fashioned
SOC100 was a little rough for me honestly but Professor Brym definitely made it more enjoyable and put in extra effort making it more engaging for us, which is hard to do with an online course. I really appreciated the little details like putting songs at the starts of lectures for us and I can tell he's very passionate about the field :)
alot of the people complaining here are obviously people who have never taken a social studies course before. his tests aren't that hard even if you choose to study the night before, and are typical for a course with this subject material. lectures are pretty interesting but assessments could be done a little better.
the reading is boring. and the final exam focused on very specific details from the reading and the lecture notes. Professor Brym seems nice ( I never met him in person and all the lectures are pre-recorded).
Genuinely one of the nicest professors who always responds to concerns. The course itself isn't necessarily easy but it's not incredibly difficult either, expecting a university level course to be a walk in the park would be your fault. Overall, the lectures and required readings were interesting, and there were never any surprises in the exams :)
He always tries to sort an issue if he can and is very prompt in doing so. Yes, this course is very reading heavy but if you know the course content you will do well. His quizzes are straightforward and based entirely on the content taught. Good professor and tries to make online teaching interesting by adding music clips on lecture videos.
This course made me hate sociology to be honest. Maybe if it was in person I would have another opinion, but it definitely didn't work for me online. The tests and quizzes do not test your learning - I do not know how some MC questions can determine your passing in this course. Do yourself a favor and go for other courses.
His tests are so detailed.... And the lecture is boring for me.
I have so much to say but not enough characters. DO NOT TAKE SOC100 WITH THIS PROFESSOR. For an intro class it should be easy but he makes it TERRIBLE and HARD. Don't bother watching the lectures, he just reads the slides. His tests and quizzes cover the most useless details and he does not care about students. Anyone that says he's good is wrong.
SOC100 is decent with Prof. Brym. He responded to issues promptly and his announcements on Quercus were detailed. Little bits of news and music in the lectures made the course more interesting. Tests are straight forward and fair. However, the course readings are heavy and the final contained a lot of rote memorizations. CONSISTENT EFFORT REQUIRED.
DON'T TAKE HIS CLASS!!! Course assessments did not test our understanding of concepts, instead, we needed to memorize the smallest and most insignificant of details (ie, graphs he showed literally once). In other courses I got low 90s, in this class I got 60s on assessments despite hours and hours of studying. VERY textbook heavy. Good luck.
I had the unfortunate experience of doing my first semester of first year online. I'm not sure whether he's like this in person or whether it was just because of the awkwardness of speaking to a camera but Professor Brym's lectures were quite boring. The textbook got me through the course. Prepare for slightly confusing questions in quizzes.
Brym's lectures and the reading he assigns are pretty dry and heavily opinionated. Tutorials are useful but also boring. However, this class is genuinely not hard. If you do your readings, take detailed notes, focus on understanding the key concepts, and make sure don't second guess yourself on tests/quizzes (all m/c), you should get decent grades
Very very hard tests! Ruined my GPA!
From my experience, a lot of the people who complain about Brym are the same ones slacking through the semester. With that being said, it's up to you to regularly do the readings and watch lectures. He outlines exactly what will be on the quizzes and he was usually accommodating. Course concepts are easy tho so just put the work in!
Professor Brym was a great prof when it came down to learning about sociology as a whole, but his testing methods were really poor. His quizzes were fairly easy and he told us what to expect, which was great! However, his exams were not written the best. It felt like he was testing us more on random facts that we learned more than actual sociology.
Tests were focused on recall of incredibly specific details from the textbook instead of the actual concepts. In the final, he asked us to remember what example he had used in chapter 2 of the book. He wrote the book and changes it every year, so you have to buy it. The textbook is the most important part, and it's grueling for a 1st year class.
The lectures were fine to sit through and the readings were interesting (very long and gruelling reads, but still interesting). It just sucks that 70% of your mark comes from tests tests that were basically purely based off minuscule details from the textbook. If youre not great at tests like me, avoid this course with Brym like the plague.
This course was definitely my favorite as a first-year at UofT. The SOC100 tests came straight from the book and his lectures, and tutorials were a great help. His lectures were pretty straightforward and clear.
The lectures weren't really important, they were basically just him explaining the readings. It's VERY reading heavy, but the readings are great. The lectures were monotone, tests often had out-of-syllabus random questions. But he's not all bad like the popular opinion. E.g. - he gave everyone 100% on a quiz because it was too close to our midterm.
Brym's lectures were very similar to the long readings he would assign, making them excessively repetitive. The course relied on tests and quizzes. The quizzes were only 10 MC questions, so it was hard to do well. The final didn't really test your understanding as it was full of specific numbers and heavy on small topics instead of main ideas.
soc quizzes are based on tutorials. hate the wording. the midterm was full of random details from the textbook. i studied for every quiz and still didn't receive higher than a 75%. don't recommend it. never taking a class with brym again.
when the class average was higher than last years, he decided to make future quizzes and exams harder. used terms in the exam that i had never heard of. gave us review questions for the exam, but they werent helpful for the exam at all.
I think Brym made me hate Sociology. He makes the tutorial quizzes and tests so hard. The midterm made no sense. Never taking a class with Brym ever again. I would recommend you to save yourself too.
The textbooks he uses he wrote himself which makes it easy to correlate to what hes discussing in his lectures. If you truly enjoy sociology youll like his class. Its definitely a class where youll learn a lot and have the chance to do well regardless if you have prior knowledge or not.
He's not as bad as others say, but you won't do well if you can't follow the course structure. There's 6 quizzes and 2 exams. The quizzes are fine (they aren't written by him), but the exams includes random questions about a graph from the textbook. He isn't the best lecturer (reads off the slides), but if you grasp the concepts, you'll do well.
Robert Brym was the bane of my existence. His lectures were not interesting, he made very difficult exams, and deterred me from sociology. His partner McIvor was much more engaging than he was.
He definitely knows his material. If you email him a question, he is quick to respond in depth. There is quite a bit of memorization needed. A lot of it is kind of common sense, though. He talks slow - I always speed up the video lectures to at least 1.8x Make sure you really pay attention to graphs/examples used in lectures and the two textbooks.
Took soc as breadth but this class was harder than any of my classes.
Prof. Brym is not the most entertaining during lectures, and you don't even really need to watch them. Most of the tests are based on readings, and you can pass the quizzes based on the tutorial alone. The tests had specific examples from the readings, so do those! Overall, a really stressful class.
Not an easy course at all
He tests on the most trivial things in his self-written textbook. Unless you grind the book very well, make notes and spend most of your revision time on this course, you are just able to get a C.
-Specific details on exams -Application based
I found SOC100 to be quite difficult. The readings were interesting and so were the lectures, but the grading scheme was poor, in that the multiple choice exam was 45% of the mark!The quizzes, tests and midterms were confusing and often tested on minor details. The course could be revamped to be more engaging.
SOC100 is not an easy course at all, and the grading schemes are also awful (everything is based on tests and exams). If you really need this course or want to study this course, get ready to spend a lot of time reading.
I found this course really interesting, but it is very hard. There is a lot of reading, and you have to put the lectures on 1.8x speed, because the prof talks so slow. Really pay attention to the tutorials, and be warned that this is a hard course, so you will get eh grades. The subject matter is interesting however, but the exams are difficult
A hard class, definitely not a bird course. The exams are mostly on very small, random, and specific textbook examples/material. So make sure to do the readings and take good notes. Memorize basically everything. The quizzes and exams are closed book. If you study A LOT and memorize details, you'll be able to get 80s or more.
There is a TON of reading in SOC100. To pass the course, you gotta do the readings. And they are incredibly long. His tests include specific details from the readings (and I hate readings). Brym himself was not the most engaging professor in lecture either, though that may be an online school problem. So glad SOC100 is over. So memorization heavy.
Robert Brymm is by no means my favourite professor. I found some of the things he said to be racist, and he was not extremely engaging. Despite this, much of what is said here about his soc100 class is untrue. Every single thing on the test WAS taught. Some of it was only in the textbook, but these readings were deemed mandatory.
If you do the readings and take good notes of the lectures, you will get A or above.
SOC100H1F taken asynchronous in fall 2021. Brym was reading off his slides in his lecture videos, and is very boring. Most of the grade is made up of the midterm and final tests which are all multiple choise exams, and tests on EXTREMELY DETAILED stuff from the textbook (not lectures) such as years, data trends, names, etc. killed my interst in soc
Teaches well, does not care about students though.
Abominable class. They purposefully make it difficult for you to succeed and admit that. I wouldn't wish this course and prof. combo on my worst enemy. And I really wish I had read some of these reviews before taking the class.
I had Brym in Fall 2021. His lectures were monotone but he made sense of difficult concepts, was responsive to emails, and his lectures were pretty interesting. I would take one of his classes again, he was cool.
Had it in Fall2021. As mentioned by others, extremely detail-oriented and memorization-heavy. I had to practically transcribe every lecture + copy the textbook word for word in my notes to do well. While his lectures are dry, they're concise, short and content is interesting. I further developed my love for soc, and would take again.
Took Robert for SOC100 and this course was a nightmare. His test had the class below average. The only good thing about this class is the TAs so just run.
Took his soc100 last year. I have to say that he may speak in a monotone and doesn't look like a fun person, but he explains concepts very well in the easiest way. The textbook was written by him, which is also very clear and easy to understand, with no long sentences or fancy vocabulary. Built my interest in soc and would take his class again.
He gave us a difficult, content-heavy midterm the day after Thanksgiving weekend. There are cases in which he is politically incorrect in the textbook he wrote and made us buy so he could profit off of it. His lectures were monotone and content-heavy. I would not wish him on my worst enemy.
Extremely vague questions on the midterm and final exams. The ENTIRE COURSE was graded using multiple choice. Specific questions about irrelevant, forgettable statistics, clearly intended to bring the average down. My lowest mark by a significant amount and not because I didn't study. He seems reasonable in-class, but this course was far from it.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
47%
Textbook Required
83%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.45 avg changeRatings by Course
107
5.0
(1)SOCIOLOGY
5.0
(2)SOC1011998
5.0
(1)SOCOLOGY
5.0
(1)SOC212
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
101Y
5.0
INTOTOSOCI
5.0
SOCSECT
5.0
SOS101
4.5
SOC
4.5