2.6

Robert Lecker

English - McGill University

2.6
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
30%
Would Retake
200
Reviews
2.6
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
2.4
Helpful
2.7
Clarity

30%

Would Retake

200

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

46

4

28

3

15

2

39

1

72

What Students Say

really challenged me to reflect on what it means to hate people

ENGL410 - 3.0 rating

Without a doubt the worst professor I have ever had

CANLIT - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

94%

Textbook Required

67%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 24 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
A- (7)
B (6)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(6)C(0)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(9)
Based on 31 reported grades
A: 7
A-: 7
B: 6
Rather not say: 3
Common Tags
Participation matters (27)
Tough grader (13)
Lots of homework (7)
Skip class? You won't pass. (6)
Amazing lectures (6)
Get ready to read (5)
Graded by few things (5)
Amazing lectures (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.25 avg change
Dec
Jan
Apr
May
Jun
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

415

5.0

(1)

110409

5.0

(1)

SEVERAL

5.0

(1)

ENGL409

5.0

(3)

CANLONGPOEM

5.0

(2)
+43 more courses
Difficulty by Course

339I

5.0

ENGL421

5.0

CAN

4.5

ENGLISH229

4.5

ENGL527

4.3

Reviews (200)
1.0
4.0
110229
Feb 4, 2002

Lecker thinks he's SOOOO smart

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Feb 26, 2002

Good lecturer, but totally unfair final exam!

5.0
3.0
110409
Mar 31, 2002

You'll never think the same way again. Love him

5.0
3.0
415
Grade: A
May 17, 2002

egotistical maniac, but GREAT teacher

3.0
4.0
CANLIT2
Sep 27, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
409
Oct 7, 2002

autocratic egoist, be sure to take at least one class with this guy

5.0
5.0
409
Oct 18, 2002

Has a short man complex.

5.0
2.0
CANLIT
Oct 23, 2002

Despite ego, best English prof at McGill, inspired me to do graduate studies

3.0
3.0
CANLIT
Oct 24, 2002

will change the way you think

5.0
4.0
409
Oct 31, 2002

likes to categorize things, but is a v. self-aware teacher.Good in small classes

5.0
2.0
SEVERAL
Nov 4, 2002

Rob rox. Best in small classes, very cool. Got an A!

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Dec 6, 2002

Very good lecturer and very knowledged in his topic

2.0
3.0
CANLIT
Dec 15, 2002

Not a bad teacher... but cocky as hell...

5.0
3.0
ENGL409
Jan 3, 2003

No Comments

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Jan 17, 2003

i don't know why anyone would call him knowledgeable. he's very overrated.

1.0
4.0
ENG409
Jan 23, 2003

so self absorbed he doesn't notice his students dying of boredom

5.0
3.0
409
Feb 2, 2003

He's Mr. CanLit... knows his the work inside and out, quite literally.

5.0
2.0
ENGL409
Feb 28, 2003

Boys you are at a disadvantage, but you'll find he's fair enough. Just write what he wants to read.

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Mar 21, 2003

Three words: CRAZY, SEXY, COOL.

2.0
4.0
CANLIT2
Apr 2, 2003

This monotone, egomaniac will bore you to death! Worst class i have ever taken, do not take this class! if you don't agree with his interpretations of things, expect an 'F'

5.0
3.0
CANLIT2
Apr 4, 2003

I really enjoyed his class. Sure, his voice can be boring but he's got some really decent ideas - and I've found him to be really into input - and especially questions during his lectures! I'd take the class again for sure.

2.0
1.0
ENG
Apr 15, 2003

Three words: LAZY, UGLY, FOOL

5.0
2.0
ENGL
Apr 25, 2003

He is easily one of the best profs at McGill. Down to earth, provocative, prying, and a real performer: should be hosting his own talk show (in spare time).

4.0
2.0
229
Apr 29, 2003

certainly a good intro teacher (canlit). clear, goes over things many times, very easy but not stupid-like.

4.0
2.0
ALICEMUNRO
May 19, 2003

Excellent teacher... though kind of cold/unhelpful as a person...

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
May 20, 2003

No Comments

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
May 22, 2003

He embodies everything that is twisted and warped in both academia and humanity. Avoid at all costs.

4.0
3.0
CANLIT
May 26, 2003

You either love him, or hate him. I really enjoyed his class, he is an interesting lecturer, very funny in a dry sort of way. An old hippie, really. He loves literature, and if you can grasp this, you will love it too. Overall, a good prof.

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Jun 1, 2003

I really enjoyed his class. He's very knowledgeable and a great lecturer. Very entertaining.

5.0
3.0
CANLIT2
Jun 2, 2003

his lectures are so provocative and have warped the way i look at language and history. he's very much in love with himself, but he really knows his stuff and always encourages questions

1.0
2.0
CANLIT
Aug 17, 2003

This man should retire already. Not only does he have little interesting to say about anything, but he has a serious memory problem that causes him to become defensive and angry. Don't bother with Lecker. Take Trehearne instead. Lecker is irrelevant.

1.0
3.0
ALICEMUNRO
Aug 19, 2003

Cold and unintelligent. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
Aug 25, 2003

Without a doubt the worst professor I have ever had. In his class we learned: he drives an Acura; he has a mansion in Westmount; he has an art collection; he is a FULL professor; he owns a publishing company. AVOID this self-enchanted, skirt-chasing fool

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Aug 27, 2003

I agree fully--self-obsessed and really not that insightful. Also, the guy hasn't published in years. As widely hated in the academic community as he is known.

2.0
4.0
GRADENGL
Sep 4, 2003

No Comments

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
Sep 16, 2003

Actually he is generous...if you are blond, female, attractive and stupid, he will give you marks of 100% on your papers. If you make the extra effort to dress provocatively, he will give you a job as an RA, or in his company. A total low-life. AVOID.

5.0
2.0
CANLIT
Nov 19, 2003

Awesome. Totally committed to Canadian Literature.

4.0
1.0
CANLIT
Nov 23, 2003

No Comments

5.0
2.0
ENGL
Dec 4, 2003

What a cool guy. High on entertainment value, and really into teaching... sometimes strays from the readings, but has a lot of great things to say.

4.0
4.0
ALICEMUNRO
Dec 7, 2003

I learned a lot about academic writing from him. I thought he was a bit too arogant, but a good prof.

5.0
3.0
ENGL333
Dec 13, 2003

i've learned so much from him. yeah, he can be an arrogant ****, but he has allowed me to question my entire literary framework and incorporate class material into personal thought

5.0
2.0
ENG
Jan 5, 2004

not the nicest guy but a fanatastic teacher

2.0
3.0
CANPOETRY
Feb 16, 2004

i agree, completely arrogant and a really boring class

4.0
1.0
ENGL
Feb 25, 2004

yep. good.

4.0
3.0
ENGL339
Mar 15, 2004

he's a great prof, really makes you question literature, but one class with him is enough! if you've taken one course with him, you've taken them all

1.0
5.0
CANLIT2
Apr 27, 2004

Very hard marker, classes are not very interesting. makes students feel dumb when they participate

4.0
4.0
CANLIT1
Jul 18, 2004

ego ego ego

2.0
3.0
CANLIT101
Jul 29, 2004

No Comments

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Aug 17, 2004

He's so brilliant, but he makes you feel like an idiot if you say something in class that doesn't match his opinion and that you don't have theory to back up...he called one girl a colonizer...but he's totally cutting-edge and is a fantastic resource.

2.0
1.0
CANLIT
Sep 12, 2004

innappropriate, and unprofessional. narrow-minded. fiercely methodical = boring.

2.0
2.0
ENGL
Sep 28, 2004

belittles students

2.0
3.0
ENGLISH
Oct 1, 2004

If you're a hot girl, take this class! If you're a girl. but not hot, or a guy, don't. That's all I'm sayin'...and I'm a girl.

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
Oct 9, 2004

I'm amazed to find positive comments here. If you're an attractive female, and you're willing to respond to his crude, in-class sexual innuendo, a Lecker course is your best shot at an easy A.

3.0
5.0
ENGL
Nov 11, 2004

I cannot get his beady eyes out of my head. They haunt me to this day. Please don't take his class. Oh, unless you are hot and female. Oh, but then you are sacrificing morals for an A. Oh, but that is so typically McGill-like.

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Nov 14, 2004

I like Professor Lecker---I think he's totally brilliant and I think the classes I have taken with him have been great. There may be something to this attractive female preference of his, but seriously, it doesn't effect his marking or anything.

4.0
4.0
CANLIT
Nov 17, 2004

I can believe all the "hot girl" claims but, I never saw anything like that. He's obsessed with his subject and he has high expectations for his students. If you do have a different opinion than he you'd better be able to back it up and be persuasive. Taken 3 of his classes. Creepy maybe, but great!

4.0
3.0
CANLIT
Nov 21, 2004

Lecker is a prof that you will resist. He genuinely wants you to learn and care as much about this stuff as he does. He tries to get everyone angry in the class deliberately to start discussion and get people caring and thus learning. Marking is easier because that's not the point, people.

2.0
3.0
CANPOETRY
Dec 3, 2004

stay away.

5.0
2.0
CANLONGPOEM
Dec 10, 2004

He's devoted to his subject matter, not the appearance of his female students; any claims that undermine him in that regard are complete nonsense. He will rid you of any apathy and change the way you view literature, and make you laugh at the same time.

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Dec 20, 2004

Obsessed with his subject? The guy has published almost nothing since his PhD thesis. I'm a grad student who wanted to learn from him...take Trehearne instead. Lecker is much more concerned with self-aggrandizement--he's a pathetic man.

1.0
2.0
CANLIT
Dec 21, 2004

Lecker is a horrible teacher. For an A, all you have to do is regurgitate his asinine conspiricy theories and tell him how much you hate America. AND THE "HOT GIRL" STORIES ARE 100% TRUE. Gentlemen, don't waste time putting effort into writing the journals: if you're a guy, he never reads them.

3.0
3.0
ENG
Dec 27, 2004

re: previous comments. dude, I don't know what you've been smoking, but no one takes Trehearne for his looks. They take him 'cause they want to be challenged. Let's just try it on for size: 'Brian is SOOO HOT! I could just stare a him for hours'???!! Um, nope. But thanks for the laugh.

1.0
3.0
LONGPOEM
Dec 27, 2004

Pathetic. So desperately wants to be loved.

2.0
2.0
CANLIT
Dec 29, 2004

not a shining light.

1.0
3.0
CDNLIT
Dec 29, 2004

No Comments

5.0
3.0
CANLONGPOEM
Grade: A+
Jan 5, 2005

I had a good time in this class, I learned a lot, and my thinking and writing improved immeasurably---I owe this entirely to the teaching methods of the excellent professor.

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Jan 6, 2005

Owe it to yourself, not this ****wit.

1.0
2.0
ENG
Jan 14, 2005

terrible

2.0
3.0
CANPOETRY
Jan 23, 2005

He's a has-been with a chip on his shoulder.

2.0
4.0
CANLIT
Jan 30, 2005

probably the worst prof ive ever had. Professor **** is boring, stupid and tells you how to respond to literature and art. Go back to concordia, perv.

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Feb 8, 2005

No Comments

4.0
2.0
ENGL229
Feb 9, 2005

It's quite obvious that those of you making these negative comments about the prof are undergrads. This is my third degree- my first was in lit- and, trust me, he isn't that bad compared to most. But, only experience will show you this. Being critical doesn't mean being negative. Grow up!

1.0
3.0
ENG
Feb 9, 2005

You don't need to have a handful of degrees to recognize that Lecker is a man who is little more than mediocre. Check out what he's published. He was a guy who happened to be in the right place at the right time--so he got a professorship. Sure, he's passable, but he's also a self-enchanted jerk.

4.0
2.0
ENGL217
Feb 19, 2005

For the student who called the prof "a self-enchanted jerk," what did he do/say? Almost every other lit prof at McGill makes you read their works, and love touting their awards and how esteemed they are. The only comment Lecker ever made about himself is how mediocre of a student he was in the past

2.0
2.0
CANLIT
Feb 24, 2005

He was once an influential critic, and he single-handedly put CanLit on the map with his bibliographic series in the 80s. He can also be an inspiring lecturer. The man's attitude, however, is at issue here. He's self-absorbed and just doesn't treat students with any kind of consideration.

2.0
2.0
CANADIAN
Feb 25, 2005

The comment below that Lecker is not self-absorbed was yet another one here written by Lecker himself. Pathetic.

1.0
2.0
ENG
Feb 26, 2005

You want examples? He used his (now thankfully defunct) publishing company to drag students (mostly chicks he wanted to impress) into a thankless internship situation. He'd insist on his mindblowing knowledge of publishing and treat people like****. Ask anyone who worked there.

5.0
3.0
CANLIT
Mar 17, 2005

great prof. i was completely uninterested in canadian lit. untill i took this class. he opened up my eyes to this great literature that i'd been missing out on. he can not at all be considered self absorbed when compared to some of the other english prof.'s at mcgill. smart,down to earth,and helpful

1.0
3.0
ENGL228
Mar 23, 2005

The is a a**!!!! He only makes you read books that HE wrote and his sarcasm is unbearable! Avoid like the plague!!!

1.0
5.0
CANPOETRY
Apr 7, 2005

Lecker was my honours thesis advisor. He only wanted to talk about himself and get me to do work for him. I thought it'd be a good idea in order to advance myself. When I got my thesis back, it became clear that he hadn't even read it. I was stupid to think he was anything but a self-serving jerk.

2.0
2.0
ENG339
Apr 8, 2005

Lecker can be an interesting lecturer however he also comes across as arrogant and condescending, especially if you disagree with his ideas. He will not hesitate to publicly shut you down. Talks less about class material & more about his person ideas. He's a very smart guy...just not for everyone.

1.0
4.0
ONDAATJE
May 26, 2005

By far the worst English prof I had during my time at McGill. Perhaps I might have been able to learn something from him if he wasn't too busy name-dropping and going off on tangents. This man clearly loves himself and lacks perspective.

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Grade: A
Jul 24, 2005

Don't believe the negative comments; he's actually far, far worse. He knows a lot but you have to get past his personality to find it, and that can be a chore with this miserable, self-infatuated, leering old man.

3.0
2.0
339
Jul 25, 2005

Not the greatest class but better than taking a boring survey class. The prof can at times come off as slightly callous but the TA we had made up for some of it. The reading are rather bad (bad books that center around sex and are written rather poorly) There are no lectures, everyone just sits and talks about what they liked and didn't like

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Aug 11, 2005

A vile, ****ous pr***. A disgusting, short man who has a very good knowledge of canlit, but is too preoccupied with name-dropping and belittling his students to share any of it. Avoid, avoid, avoid.

2.0
3.0
CANLIT
Aug 14, 2005

The man is egocentric in his teaching, agonistic in his writing, and as bitter as wormwood. His vision of Canadian literature is past its due date, mostly because he is self-referential and has completely failed to consider other currents and opinions over the years. A bad trip: AVOID.

2.0
3.0
CDNLIT
Aug 19, 2005

if there were a rating for knowledge he'd do a lot better, cuz he knows a lot, but all that you've heard and read is true. it's all about him, although he might try to make you think he has your best interests at heart. if he expresses an interest in you, tells you you're great, etc., RUN THE OTHER WAY! he's just looking to exploit you. believe it.

1.0
5.0
CAN
Aug 27, 2005

Absolutely true. It's a big problem because he covers a segment of CanLit that I needed to learn but what I learned instead was everything you read in the reviews below. So... two words: retire, already.

1.0
4.0
CANADIANPOETRY
Sep 28, 2005

If you haven't got the idea from all these other comments, do not take this guy's class! Seriously, he will do more harm than good.

5.0
3.0
CANPO
Oct 23, 2005

I don't know, he's not so bad. Some of the students in the class make me want to rip off my arm and beat them with it, but he doesn't. He's hardcore, that's for sure.

3.0
5.0
339I
Dec 11, 2005

What a total knob this man is. Sickeningly pretentious; excruciatingly arrogant; just not that interesting. Totally disingenuous: Full Of**** pretty much sum him up. Feigns interest students but can't be bothered to mark papers - TA does everything. So clearly fantasises about being crushed on and hero-worshipped by students: it's pathetic.

4.0
3.0
CANLIT
Dec 15, 2005

professor lecker is nice if you talk to him outside of class. he remembers your name and ****es if you don't take all the classes he offers, which is endearing. but it's easy to fall out of favor with him if you don't follow through with your chumminess.

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
Dec 18, 2005

Waste of time. All of the negative comments are bang on. The man is not seen by anyone (except perhaps the students he manipulates into idolatry) as an intellectual powerhouse, yet believes he's a pillar of Canadian literary criticism. Take Trehearne instead--at least he'll mark your papers.

1.0
3.0
CANLIT
Dec 21, 2005

retire. please.

2.0
5.0
CANADIANPOETRY
Jan 8, 2006

He is a very inteligent man and a expert in his feild, but it's his way or else. he'll never admit it but his opinion as all that matters

2.0
4.0
CHEE310
Feb 13, 2006

did not emphasise any of the important material and also makes the material more confusing then it should be

1.0
1.0
ONDAATJE
Feb 15, 2006

okay...if anyone wants evidence of this guy's supreme narcissism, check out "dr. delicious: memoirs of a life in canlit." who in hell wants to read this ridiculous excuse for a professor's memoirs? what an idiot.

1.0
1.0
CANLIT
Feb 19, 2006

No Comments

4.0
3.0
LONGPOEM
Mar 17, 2006

i like prof. lecker. i think people just need to relax and not take things so seriously. come on, it's funny that he's narcissistic...no?? it's funny when he rants about stuff that has nothing to do with class. you're going to learn a lot if you do the reading-and if you take advantage of the fact that he makes you write so much.

5.0
3.0
ENG437
Mar 28, 2006

Whether you like his quirks or not, at the end of the day, Dr. Delicious gets the job done! Brilliant professor with a wealth of information to share and a very organized and structured course. (But not afraid to take an entertaining tangent or six.)

1.0
2.0
LONGPOEM
Apr 25, 2006

I have no idea what you people are talking about. Were you in the same class?

1.0
2.0
CANLIT
May 17, 2006

Take Trehearne.

2.0
4.0
CAN
Jun 3, 2006

A. Take Trehearne if you want a serious, focused, scholarly take on CanLit. B. You will learn a thing or two from Lecker; you will... IF you're willing to resist the urge to storm out of his class because of the way he treats students like an American TV audience to be won over with the most obvious tricks of the entertainment industry. He sho

1.0
2.0
LONGPOEM
Jun 17, 2006

No Comments

3.0
1.0
CANPOET
Jun 21, 2006

No Comments

1.0
2.0
CANLIT
Jun 23, 2006

Can I be the third to say take Trehearne? This guy will prove to you that PhD doesn't equal smart. He's really lacking in many ways, and if you think he's insightful about something, he's probably stolen the idea from one of his grad students. Loser.

4.0
3.0
CANLIT
Aug 3, 2006

Seriously: take both Lecker AND Trehearne. This way, you will get a balanced understanding of what is going on in the world of Canadian lit. If you just take Trehearne, you'll miss all the good postmodern stuff and if you just take Lecker, you'll go crazy (see below)!

4.0
3.0
ENGL339
Oct 4, 2006

Lecker has a unique style of teaching which may not suit everyone, but he is brilliant and provides such a honest interpretation of Can Lit. The modern focus of the class is a nice change from the classically-oriented McGill. He is funny, intelligent and makes you consider ideas in ways you never thought of before. Lots of readings but worth it!

5.0
2.0
ENGL339
Oct 22, 2006

I was afraid that he would be a strict teacher with a difficult workload and impossible expectations; I was wrong. He is realistic, funny, and keeps one's attention at all times throughout his lectures. If I can, I will gladly register for another one of his courses. Dr. Lecker, you rule, keep up the good work! You won't regret taking his class!

1.0
2.0
ENG339
Oct 22, 2006

Put it this way: he was my honours thesis supervisor and he didn't even read the bloody thing. Useless, self-important, and not even that bright. Maybe I'd give him a pass if he had an iota of insight on Can Lit.

5.0
4.0
ENGL527
Dec 8, 2006

Professor Lecker is one of the few teachers at mcgill who actually cares what people think. He makes outrageous comments in class to stimulate conversation and get debate going. Moreover, few professors at mcgill or anywhere know nearly as much about can lit as he does. Great professor. Really.

1.0
2.0
ENG500
Dec 13, 2006

I thought he was good-then I went to grad school. The man is as disliked as he is known and his books are not exactly well respected. What Lecker is good at is making undergrads feel special-it's like a power game with him. If you ever challenege him, he acts like he's been betrayed. He's not afraid to toss insults; he's just generally miserable.

5.0
5.0
ENGL527
Dec 23, 2006

If you want to learn CanLit, Professor Lecker is the person to learn it from. He will challenge you to think, read, and write in new ways, which some students may call "hard" or "mean," but as Lecker himself says, you can't produce quality without hard work. Truly one of the best professors McGill has to offer.

4.0
4.0
ENGL333
Apr 6, 2007

No Comments

2.0
1.0
CANLIT
Jun 25, 2007

No Comments

3.0
3.0
ENGLSECT
Aug 25, 2007

Lecker talks about how he was a lazy student in the past, but when I was battling horrendous OCD rituals that made it tough for me to show up on time to class, he never hesitated to point it out in front of the class and tell me I was thumbing my nose at the entire university system. Not what I needed to hear at that point in my life, thanks.

4.0
4.0
ENGL315
Sep 11, 2007

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENGL339
Sep 11, 2007

cynical, negative and sarcastic. made me feel nervous. SUCKS

5.0
4.0
ENGCAN
Apr 2, 2008

No Comments

5.0
5.0
ENGL333
Jan 21, 2009

Challenges you in a very real way. If he thinks you're wrong/full of it, he tells you. Don't like that? Don't take his class. That said, he is open to and does explore many angles concerning Can Lit. Arrogant? Bitter? I don't know if these comments should refer to him or to students who probably didn't like their grade. Simply: he's challenging.

3.0
3.0
ENGL333
Oct 12, 2009

take it from sum1 who knows: if he wants to take you under his wing, clear the stars from your eyes and run-don't walk-away. he likes collecting undergrads. i was 1 of them. i wish i'd chosen better.

2.0
3.0
ENGL333
Oct 21, 2009

Provocative and inspired lecturer; terrible one-on-one. Do not become his RA or his TA. Do not believe him if he says you're a genius. That's just the first step to your own demise. Do the work, keep your head down, learn what you can from the man, and move on. He's a CanLit legend but he has serious attitude problems.

1.0
5.0
ENGL421
Nov 28, 2009

Prof. Lecker has no qualms with messing students around. He is forgetful and lazy. Furthermore he is very inconsistent. In a brief conversation with you he will be agressive, cold, condescending, and flirtateous. DONT write your thesis with him! You will end up trying to help him save face as he pretends to have read your essay. Retire Dr Delicous!

2.0
4.0
CANLIT
Dec 7, 2009

If you want Lecker to like, you must read his memoirs. The man constantly needs his ego fed. Dont act too smart around him. He might feel threatened. Keep in mind he wants you to feel like he taught you everything you knows. Confide in him, tell him about your personal life. Maybe then he will concede that you are grad school material.

2.0
1.0
ALICEMONR
Dec 8, 2009

If you've taken one class with him, you've taken them all. He's smart but doesn't have anything new to say.

4.0
3.0
ENGL333
Sep 2, 2010

I had zero interest in Canadian Poetry going into the class, but Professor Lecker's class was the best I've taken at McGill. The class is hard - you have to write a lot, but there are no exams or long form papers, so it doesn't feel as bad. He really encourages real discussion in the class, which is unfortunately rare at McGill.

2.0
5.0
ENGL229
Nov 24, 2010

After taking this course, I will be sure to never take another course with this man. He is rude, self-centered, uninspiring, unhelpful, and I could say more. I didn't think anyone could make me hate a literature course, but that's one way he succeeded. He's the worst prof. He wants nothing but recognition for his own work.

1.0
5.0
ENGL229
Dec 14, 2010

Just do yourself a favour and stay away from this guy. He will make you resent what you're learning even though a lot of it is really cool. Sometimes during an entire lecture he won't once bring up what you're reading and only talk about the author or poet in general. You have to be completely self-motivated as he does not make you want to work.

2.0
4.0
ENGL229
Jan 13, 2011

Most condescending, unfair, and self-absorbed professor I have ever had. His lectures were completely about the authors of the poetry--something that would not be on the exam--and he was completely unclear in his expectations. The poetry and short stories in the course were quite interesting, but he somehow made them unenjoyable.

5.0
4.0
ENGL410
Apr 7, 2011

Prof. Lecker changed my life perspective, made me a better writer, and helped me find a career: all in one course. I found him to be a fascinating lecturer - although the course I took with him was a conference of 20, not a lecture. He was always very interested in his students and visiting him at office hours is great. He is challenging & awesome.

2.0
2.0
ENGL333
Nov 7, 2011

He picks favorites and if you're not on his good side, or you don't agree with his ideas, he makes you pay. I have never had an issue with a professor but he is AWFUL. Trust me, stay away!

5.0
3.0
ENGL333
Nov 17, 2011

people that dont like Lecker do not apply themselves in class. He is BEYOND helpful - always encourages students to see him in office hours. He encourages participation which makes the class more interesting. Take a class with him. Great prof.

1.0
4.0
ENGL333
Dec 21, 2011

Beyond useless

5.0
3.0
ENGL333
Jan 7, 2012

He specifically sets up the assignments to make everyon arrive in class having done the readings, and to help people keep up and do well. It was tough having a mini paper due twice a week, but then we got to revise them and submit the month's worth all together for the grade. No midterm or final. He encourages discussion, and coming to his office.

5.0
3.0
ENGL229
Mar 29, 2012

Has a true passion for Canadian Literature, and is one of the best professors to study under if you wish to learn more in that field. He gets you into a routine of writing constantly which is tough at times, but gets you engaged. A little intimidating to speak in front of sometimes in the lectures, but there are conferences and a discussion board.

1.0
4.0
ENGL333
Apr 9, 2012

Fairly unintelligent, and narcissistic as the day is long. If you accidentally make him feel threatened your grade WILL suffer, as his grading method is entirely subjective

5.0
1.0
ENGL333
Apr 8, 2013

Lecker is awesome. Engage with him. Get to know him. Don't get so defensive about the supposed "ego" that everyone on here is talking about, and just let him open your eyes a little - you might like what you see, you might not, but either way, taking his class is essential for learning how to talk about art.

3.0
3.0
ENGL229
Jan 16, 2014

very boring class. pretends to want to get to know you, but he secretly wants you to think just like his interpretations. lectures are painful to get through.

2.0
3.0
ENGL229
Jan 23, 2014

Most boring& uninteresting, painfully suicidal class ever. Do not take if you like to think freely and interpret literature the way it is supposed to be-subjective. He wants you to think like him, so in the end you are only pleasing the prof. Zero motivation and interest to attend his class. Most people are bored to death

1.0
3.0
ENGL229
Apr 14, 2014

I ended up having to use notes from other Canadian lit. classes just to understand what was going on in lecture. Disorganized, uninteresting lectures and a prof who won't listen to constructive criticism from students is a bad combo. AVOID AVOID AVOID.

2.0
3.0
ENGL229
Grade: B
May 3, 2014

Professor Lecker is an expert on Canadian Literature. He makes a real effort to help his students succeed. It's not at all an easy class and it really depends on the TAs that grade your exams. I enjoyed the class and would suggest it to friends. Remember it's not an easy A. You need to put in the work in order to do well.

1.0
2.0
ENGL229
May 31, 2014

just not interested anymore, it's so obvious

2.0
4.0
ENGLISH229
Grade: A-
Nov 8, 2014

Mailing it in. An Abomination.

3.0
5.0
ENGL229
May 1, 2015

He knows his stuff... but not there for his students. Very distant professor and not very approachable. VERY harsh grader. Do not take if you are not an English major!

3.0
4.0
ENGL410
Grade: F
Dec 14, 2016
Wouldn't take again

really challenged me to reflect on what it means to hate people...

SO MANY PAPERS
3.0
4.0
ENGL229
Mar 29, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Professor Lecker is someone who clearly knows what he is talking about from a professor's point of view. If you are not an English major you will find yourself being utterly confused and frustrated in this class. He isn't very approachable nor does he try to aid the student's understanding. When it comes to exams he is very vague.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
2.0
4.0
ENGL229
Apr 3, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Do not recommend if you are not an ENGL major; its a hard pass. Not approachable at all, and puts himself before his students. Attendance is mandatory and participation is crucial (in class + online discussion boards and he keep track of how many times you post). Midterm and Final, both essays. no other assignments. Tough grader.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
4.0
3.0
ENGL229
Apr 6, 2017
Would take again

I liked Lecker. His lectures were very interesting and depending on your TA, the conferences can really help clarify things if need. He has really insightful things to say about what we read, he's very knowledgeable about the content&the authors and encourages people to give their own ideas in class. Have the readings done before class, its a must!

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
ENGL229
Grade: B
Apr 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

A pretty tough grader, and I'd say that if he agrees with what you're saying, you'll do well. Grading is subjective anyways, but he takes it to a new level. Personally, I didn't like him too much. The material was pretty interesting on the other hand. My TA this year was incredible though!

Tough Grader
Participation matters
4.0
3.0
ENGL229
Apr 16, 2019
Would take again

At first I almost dropped the class because Lecker seemed so tough but after the first week this became one of my favorite classes. There's work to do for every class but mostly just a few short poems. Wanna get a good grade? Participate. That's it people. Raise your hand, say things and write in the discussion. Don't half ass and pass

Participation matters
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
ENGL229
Grade: B+
Sep 3, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Honestly, as a Professor he is good, however he has a grading criteria that makes it hard to do well (which is the class' major downfall). Not a lot of reading (very short). Not too many assignments. He is very interested in what he is teaching (and this made me feel enthused). Learns students individually too.

Participation matters
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
ENGL229
Grade: A-
Sep 6, 2020
Would take again

As one of my first ever university courses, ENGL229 was a bit of a rude awakening. Prof Lecker is eloquent and knowledgeable as a lecturer but not super clear in terms of a grader. He gives out As very seldom and even admitted that there's no clear rubric for how to get one. This was my one criticism. Overall, a challenging and engaging class.

Accessible outside class
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
1.0
4.0
ENGL333
Dec 12, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Glad I'm not the only one who dislikes this professor. He ruins the experience of eng lit. Cold, dry, unengaging, uninviting to any interpretations other than his own, unapproachable, narcissistic. His class is for learning about him--him talking about himself as as a publisher, his very specific ideas of interpretation. Do not suffer through him!

1.0
4.0
ENGL333
Dec 12, 2020
Wouldn't take again

someone please teach this man some sympathy. english lit is about embracing the diverse perspectives and readings of students. since he didn't do that at all, I'm ashamed to even consider this class as part of my learning experience. pity that he doesn't know what students actually think of him.

4.0
4.0
ENGL229
Grade: A
Dec 29, 2020
Would take again

Prof Lecker adapted very well to the online format and put effort into engaging with the students. zoom attendance and participation counted for 40%, so you could bump up your mark easily by just contributing to discussions. I am not an English major but I found it very interesting. Prof has met your fav authors and will tell you all about them.

Accessible outside class
Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
ENGL229
Grade: A-
Jan 8, 2021
Would take again

Interesting lectures, full of stories about the authors (many of whom he knows personally). Grading's a bit subjective; it's hard to get a solid grasp on the criteria from the rubric, but work with the feedback he and the TA give you, and you'll do alright. DO YOUR READINGS!!! They're absolutely essential and he rewards good participation/questions

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
3.0
ENG333
Feb 4, 2021
Wouldn't take again

This professor made it very hard for me to enjoy the semester. His class was dreaded and extremely anxiety inducing.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
ENGL229
Feb 26, 2021
Would take again

Prof Lecker has lots of good stories and heavily encourages participation, so if you talk and engage, you'll do well. He is one to counter your arguments, but I just saw it as a way to strengthen our perspectives on the readings. Not easy, but not too hard if you put in the work.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
1.0
5.0
ENGL333
Oct 17, 2021
Wouldn't take again

this class has very interesting readings, but prof lecker makes the process uncomfortable and anxiety inducing. wasn't clear about grading criteria and left me feeling anxious every day

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
1.0
3.0
ENG333
Grade: A-
Jan 10, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Professor Lecker has little to no care about the comfort and mental health of his students. I found his class to be uncomfortable at the best of times because your opinion feels judged byu Lecker every time you speak despite being encouraged to speak. i truly have not taken a class that was so dreaded in my entire degree.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
5.0
229
Apr 29, 2022

Good prof but his and ta's grading was harsh and unclear. Need to post on discussion board twice a week and comment on others, attend each lecture to sign attendance and 3 papers which are all graded harshly. The conferences were often disorganized and class never ended early. If you count, you're in class 4 hours a week instead of 3 hours.

Tough grader
Amazing lectures
Lots of homework
5.0
3.0
229
Grade: Rather not say
Apr 30, 2022
Would take again

An exceptional professor -- engaging, approachable, the material covered was compelling and he treats his students with the utmost respect. His class felt like a community where everyone was growing together. Words cannot express how much I enjoyed this course and I would recommend it to anyone with an interest in literature/Canada.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Accessible outside class
1.0
4.0
ENGL527
Nov 4, 2022

Prof. Lecker has made women in his course physically uncomfortable. That is an understatement / euphemism. Also, there are a lot of readings in his class. He is not very approachable.

5.0
3.0
409
Sep 20, 2023
Would take again

I am so confused by the amount of bad reviews for this prof. He is hands down the best prof in the English department, yes he will challenge you but he is not belittling or making fun of you he is making you a better writer and think more critically about the material. He will speak to you as an equal and genuinely just wants people to improve.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
409
Dec 16, 2023
Would take again

Amazing professor, and gem of a human being. I feel incredibly lucky to have taken Alice Munro this past semester. Great at facilitating discussion, and very encouraging. Absolute goat!

5.0
4.0
ENGL409
Grade: A-
Dec 24, 2023
Would take again

Robert Lecker will make you a better writer! Get ready to submit a lot of essays (10+) and receive in-depth feedback on each one of them. I highly recommend taking a class with Lecker-- you will read some pretty incredible works, get comfortable writing essays, and have interesting and challenging classroom discussions.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Gives good feedback
5.0
3.0
229
Grade: A
Jan 4, 2024
Would take again

Previous reviews scared me but Lecker ended up being my favourite professor! He's so knowledgeable and I always looked forward to this course. Reading was manageable (one author per lecture). Don't work too hard on the online discussion posts due for every lecture, they can be short. Two in-class essays that were honestly fun. Recommended!

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Inspirational
1.0
3.0
229
Feb 25, 2024

makes female students uncomfortable. sad but not surprising that the university does nothing.

5.0
3.0
409
Mar 11, 2024

Most of what students say is true. He's brilliant, and what he teaches is fascinating. But like most brilliant people, he can be a eccentric, and if you're disrespectful to him, move aside. Enjoy the material, the amazing lectures, the tough lessons about academic writing, the humour. Don't confuse him with a buddy. He has a lot of experience.

2.0
3.0
ENGL333
Grade: A-
Apr 22, 2024

Professor Lecker is a knowledgeable and interesting faculty member in the department. Unfortunately, his class can make people quite anxious because of the small class size and overall "seminar" type of format.He is a stickler for grammar and punctuation, and focuses a lot on eroticism. If it isn't your cup of tea,you may not enjoy your semester.

Lots of homework
Graded by few things
3.0
4.0
229
Grade: B
Apr 26, 2024
Would take again

reading reviews from years ago he's for sure improved. i loved the course; the diversity of authors was fascinating and he cares SO much about all topics covered. if you can participate you will get a better grade but he loves to play devil's advocate - i loved his teaching style but if you're sensitive/don't like blatant criticism DO NOT TAKE

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Respected
5.0
3.0
ENGL333
Grade: A
May 8, 2024
Would take again

Loved this prof! I was intimated for the first month because he appears cold but his passion for literature truly shows. We are required 1-3 poems/class, which is very reasonable. There is a required discussion post for every class. If you're present, you can definitely get a good grade! Uses slides + classes very interactive. Get ready to talk!

Participation matters
Gives good feedback
Lots of homework
1.0
3.0
ENG333
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
May 9, 2024

If you have the tiniest amount of social anxiety and struggle with verbal participation in class - avoid his class. He expects verbal participation several times a lecture and will cold call you. If you do participate and he doesn't like your answer, he will hint at what he wants to hear, trying to get you to paraphrase it aloud.

Participation matters
1.0
3.0
339
Dec 13, 2024

Robert Lecker is a professor that is long past due for retirement. The content of the class is interesting, and he manages to introduce great Canadian authors-- but fails to make his classroom a comfortable space for students. He gives little to no feedback throughout the semester, and targets female students at an astonishing rate. Avoid!

Participation matters
Lots of homework
1.0
4.0
ENGL229
Dec 13, 2024

Robert is a very harsh grader who grades unfairly. He does not follow his very own rubrics included in his course syllabus and uses statistics on MyCourses to compare who spent the most time on the discussion posts and who read the most posts. Also, if you don't write what he wants to hear on an essay, he's going to give you a bad grade. Awful.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
ENGLISH229
Dec 13, 2024

Wild grading scheme and if you aren't careful you won't know you're getting a bad final grade until the very end of semester. Being a consistent reader/doing well on tests/being attentive in class isn't enough, if you don't participate a LOT + if you don't go on every discussion post (see review below), you will not get a good grade

Tough grader
Participation matters
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
ENGL411
Dec 16, 2024

A wolf in sheep's clothing. A festering wound in the heart of academia. If you're aware of him, you know the kind of darkness he carries. If you're not… run. Those five-star reviews are just as fabricated as the man himself. Check the style. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Justice for his victims.

3.0
2.0
229
Grade: A-
Dec 17, 2024
Would take again

Decent professor overall. He makes his class interesting and asks students for feedback on how he crafts his exams or how he teaches. The material is very interesting. Participation matters.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
2.0
3.0
ENGL229
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 20, 2024

He's got a very interesting grading scheme. Basically for discussion better read and open all of them (scroll past them they'll automatically count as read) because he grades his discussions by how many u read. No matter if u listened, participated, did really good on exams IF YOU DONT OPEN ALL discussions posts were going to get a terrible grade.

Tough grader
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
229
Grade: B+
Dec 25, 2024

Unclear grading scheme, made harder by the fact that there is next to no timely feedback. The warnings on here are real, and would strongly avoid taking this class if you are wanting a high grade. Don't go off of the Mercury evaluations as he has the class fill these in before he releases the grade.

Tough grader
Participation matters
So many papers
1.0
5.0
229
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 25, 2024

Do not take this class if you want to keep your GPA intact. There is no feedback on assignments so next to impossible to gauge how you are doing in the class. When you do get feedback and incorporate it into your future assignments you get graded down. If you need English, find another prof.

Tough grader
Participation matters
2.0
3.0
229
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 6, 2025

Ended the semester with an A but because of his terrible attendance policy dropped to a B plus even though I made sure to attend every lecture. Claimed I missed eleven conferences when in fact I missed a grand total of zero. Avoid!

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
1.0
5.0
ENGL
Grade: B
Jan 15, 2025

This man is literally the creepiest little goblin to be put upon McGill. He will give you criticism but if you ask him what you can do to improve, he doesn't have a clear answer himself. Hyper-sexualises everything. Sometimes when I think I should take his advice, I go read the title of his book and its reviews and I immediately come to my senses.

1.0
4.0
ENGL333
Grade: B
Apr 22, 2025

INSANELY pedantic; docked me a lot of points on essays despite acknowledging the arguments were excellent because of minute grammatical errors and word choice. Not enough to just answer questions in class, he interrogates you and tries to get you to say what he wants. If you don't do EXTRA research you will not get full marks. Very closed-minded.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lots of homework
1.0
5.0
ENGL
Apr 30, 2025

The worst professor I have ever had. Please read the other comments and stay away. You will learn nothing. You will be treated condescendingly. You will get grades that have nothing to do with how hard you work. But the worst is that this professor makes you feel invisible with such faux niceness. Don't walk, run.

1.0
4.0
ENG333
May 4, 2025

I could never get back my time. Ruin my interest for literature.

1.0
4.0
ENGL333
Grade: B
May 8, 2025

Gave me a ZERO for participation despite online discussion posts being half of the grade and the fact I completed all of them on time and in-depth. RUN, he doesn't adhere to his own syllabus. Insanity.

Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ENG
May 8, 2025

Spent way too much time on historical background of texts. Only wants to hear his own opinions. Rude and egotistical. Ruined my experience of so many good poems

Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
ENG
Grade: Rather not say
May 11, 2025

I hate that I spent credits on a class that made me miserable the whole time being there. The lecture is irrelevant and monotonous and rigid. Learned nothing. Should have read the reviews beforehand.

4.0
3.0
ENG333
Grade: A
May 11, 2025
Would take again

One of the most important classes I've taken in my degree. Lecker is intimidating at first, and he carries strong opinions on texts, but you will learn whether you like it or not. Not a tough marker either imo. Don't let the bad reviews scare you. If talking in class is a dealbreaker he isn't for you, as he will cold call.

Participation matters
Gives good feedback
5.0
3.0
CANADIANPOETRY
Grade: A
May 30, 2025
Would take again

My favourite professor. He is the most caring, authentic, and candid prof you will meet. He doesn't sugar coat and helps prepare you for life post grad. Would love to meet him for a beer.

Participation matters
Gives good feedback
Hilarious
1.0
4.0
CAN
May 30, 2025

Some will assume students dislike him because he's “intimidating” or misunderstood but he isn't anything of the sort. It's because he's ridiculous. The ones suggesting to give him a chance are not looking out for you… very very misleading demeanour and approach so be warned before add-drop

1.0
5.0
ENG
Jun 11, 2025

The worst. I could never imagine that one day I would hate so much going to a Literature class. Should have BELIEVED all the other ratings. THE WORST EXPERIENCE OF MY STUDENT LIFE.

2.0
3.0
229
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 12, 2025

boring lectures and inconsiderate prof, he does not offer any exam help, review, or ANY INFO AT ALL before the exams. doesn't post a midterm/final guideline OR email to let people who missed class know that they discussed xyz regarding the exam. avoid if u can, very boomer man who also doesn't believe in content warnings for graphic content... ???

Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
CAN
Dec 16, 2025

No, the most crazy thing about the class is the ego. Look down on you. Teach nothing.

1.0
4.0
ENGL
Dec 16, 2025

Sending you straight to therapy. It's the attitude. It's the way this professor makes you feel like you're not worth his time. I wish I could take back my time.

5.0
3.0
110229
Dec 26, 2025
Would take again

Not for snowflakes, this prof. If you need trigger warnings and security blankets, move right on. If you want to really learn something, pull up your ankle socks, wipe your snot, pull yourself together, stop whining, read, sit, take notes; you might actually get a lot out of his course. He doesn't deserve the bad reviews--grow up.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Hilarious
1.0
4.0
CANLIT
Dec 30, 2025

Make you hate literature because he will look down on you, and honestly who would believe the positive review here, the tone is condescending just like the way he will treat you and your understanding of the text. Nope, if you're smart enough to get into this school I believe you're smart enough to stay away from this level of toxicity.

1.0
5.0
CANLIT
Dec 31, 2025

Not enough teaching, too much disparaging attitude. He doesn't care what you said clearly, only what he believes. Is this what literary discussion should be? I don't think so. This is the worst.

1.0
4.0
ENG
Dec 31, 2025

The grading scale surely is ambiguous. No comments on how you're doing in your essays especially, I really think he just doesn't care. And the reviews about his attitude are so spot-on, well, he clearly thinks that his takes are the absolutes, which leaves no room for conversation. AVOID. So many amazing professors here.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

94%

Textbook Required

67%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 24 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
A- (7)
B (6)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(6)C(0)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(9)
Based on 31 reported grades
A: 7
A-: 7
B: 6
Rather not say: 3
Common Tags
Participation matters (27)
Tough grader (13)
Lots of homework (7)
Skip class? You won't pass. (6)
Amazing lectures (6)
Get ready to read (5)
Graded by few things (5)
Amazing lectures (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.25 avg change
Dec
Jan
Apr
May
Jun
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

415

5.0

(1)

110409

5.0

(1)

SEVERAL

5.0

(1)

ENGL409

5.0

(3)

CANLONGPOEM

5.0

(2)
+43 more courses
Difficulty by Course

339I

5.0

ENGL421

5.0

CAN

4.5

ENGLISH229

4.5

ENGL527

4.3

Similar Professors