3.1
Quality3.0
Difficulty55%
Would Retake110
Reviews55%
Would Retake
110
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
11
4
36
3
30
2
20
1
13
What Students Say
“He is very caring and gives great feedback”
M340L - 4.0 rating“Solid office hours and accessible outside class”
M340L - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
6%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
-0.18 avg changeRatings by Course
M408D
3.4
(7)408D
3.3
(3)M340L
3.1
(81)M341
2.9
(11)M408C
2.9
(7)Difficulty by Course
MATH53580
4.0
M341
3.8
M408D
3.7
M408C
3.4
408D
3.3
Reviews (110)
do NOT take this class. horrible lecturer and is hard to understand uses unnecessary theorems that do not help you understand calculus expects you to already understand diff and integral cal and gets upset when you have questions
Hard to understand, spend class writing down everything as fast as possible. Lectures consist of taking notes that don't always make sense. The TA's help more than going to class. Spend a lot of time on the homework and watch videos to teach yourself the material.
Kravchenko is certainly a very intelligent professor, however, his lectures are convoluted and difficult to understand. The TA did not help either. I learned more from tutors and online videos than him. Homework load is overwhelming yet tests are straightforward. I definitely would not recommend him.
Kravchenko is a decent teacher but his tests are few-numbered, multiple choice, and somewhat tricky. The TA made this class for me and complimented lectures really well. Kravchenko is willing to help outside of class but otherwise can seem confused or disappointed at times. His lectures are clear and homework is structured and organized.
First impression: difficult to understand. His accent took some getting used to. He also just does not teach well. When he derives formulas, what he is saying only makes sense if I was already familiar with the subject. If you go to class, only lectures. Lots of self-teaching. Ask questions and when he laughs, just keep asking. He will help.
Kravchenko is very intelligent, but new to teaching. Explanations are clear but fast and he prefers to derive formulas than present them for students to memorize. Mandatory weekly homework takes time, but is valuable to practice concepts. He might struggle to express himself or understand questions due to the language barrier but he makes an effort
He is very smart and knows what he's doing very well, if you ever get lost during a lecture, don't be afraid to ask for clarification. His lectures can be a little boring and hard to understand (because of the language barrier) but he means well and you can always go to his office hours. The homework helps alot for understanding material
His lectures are tedious and don't really reflect the homework, quizzes, or tests. You can tell he's a smart guy, but he doesn't translate that well into his teaching strategies. Weekly homework that is overall much more difficult than the tests. Tests aren't very hard. Having a background in calculus really helped in taking this coursewiththisprof
Kravchenko is really intelligent and very sweet, however, he can come across as disappointed and unclear at times. He writes very very fast but takes the time to derive formulas so you understand. The homework helps you understand the concepts & midterms and finals end up being a littler harder. Very willing to help during office hours, so go!!
The test are multiple choice similar to the quest homework problems. The quizzes are free response and there are 2 of them. Just study the quest homework problems and you will be fine on the test and quizzes. Don't bother going to lectures.
Kravchenko was a relatively new teacher the year I took him. I thought he did a good job of answering questions in class and that his lectures were understandable and useful. Quizzes and tests were easy and reflected the homework we had received during the semester.
Rosty was a super nice guy that truly cared about his students. He was always more than willing to help and even changed his grading policy after one of the test averages was sub-par. There was also a decent curve at the end. 100% recommend Rosty's class.
Rostyslav is an amicable Ukranian guy who clearly knows a lot about math and is always eager to help. He writes somewhat fast and because of this things can be a bit unclear, but this isn't his fault inasmuch as 50 minutes just isn't enough time for lecture. Solid office hours and accessible outside class. Notes can sub. for textbook.
Rostyslav is clearly very smart and knows a lot about the subject. Its a difficult subject so the class is not very easy, you absolutely must study outside of class if you want an A. He is very caring and gives great feedback. On a side note, he is very cute.
Very tough grader. Almost impossible to get an A if you make even the tiniest error on a test. I dont know about other professors that teach the course, I definitely would not take it again with him.
Graded by only quest HW and quest generated midterms, everything is multiple choice (read: harder problems, no partial credit) and usually involves some manipulation to get the answer. Teaching style is showing you theorems usually with a basic proof and an example, he uses an iPad to write and posts lecture notes online a few days after class.
Great professor, very, very good at explaining and lecturing. Best explanations I've had in a math class, even through his heavy accent.
Very thorough explanations. He is always willing to help if you go to office hours. I personally found the class somewhat difficult not because of the material, but rather the grading style. It is very easy to lose many if not all points for minor mistakes on tests. Kravchenko is one of the sweetest professors at the university though.
Great guy overral. His Matrices course is pretty straight forward and the grading on tests is pretty lenient. He actually cares about his students and learned my name within a month of just showing up to lecture. Hes a great lecturer and posts lecture notes online. Class average on the final was an 86.
He's a great professor, there's just a small language barrier that will probably make him difficult to understand if English isn't your first language. If you goal is to just get a C or higher, don't bother coming to class.
Kravchenko is a solid choice for a math prof he does a really good job explaining concepts. He does have a thick accent that you get used to fairly quick Only downside, Grading system is HARD. You take 4 tests that are each 12 questions long. HW is 25% of your grade, at the end everyone is graded on a bell curve so you have to hit the ground runnin
He has an accent, but he is a great teacher for how I learn. Rather than giving things to memorize, he gives the proof for each equation or concept. It really helps me give a solid understanding of the course even if some things like multi variable were hard to grasp conceptually
Professor Kravchenko is very lenient in terms of written homework grading. His quests are more theoretical than computational, although M340L is supposed to be more computational. His tests are not hard if you review the material and have a general, sound knowledge of linear algebra. Overall, just like any other math class but with lots of homework
I thought I would be fine with taking M408D bcI got a 5 on BC Calc and felt pretty confident, but this class was so difficult. Exams would be like 12 MC questions no partial credit, taken from quest but so much more difficult than hw. 25% grade is HW (quest). Lectures were all proofs, I didn't get much out of them tbh. 1 drop test, final replaces.
Its linear algebra so its no simple class. That being said, he tends to teach more theoretical than computational and the homework's and tests match that. Weekly quest and written hw, but neither are very long. Several tests throughout the semester that are similar to the theoretical parts of the homework.
Rosty is funny and super chill. The course is tough but he tries his best to make it simple. I don't like his test as they are 90% based on concepts and barely any computational stuff. Would recommend if you can learn proofs better than computing stuff. Test are multiple choice. Weekly Hw and quest both are simple
This guy is a legend, no doubt. Unintentionally hilarious without trying to and has a sick accent. Once he brought his baby to lecture and taught while holding him. Also, in the last lecture, our FIG brought him a leftover box of pizza from a FIG party and he took it home with him. The class isn't bad, a Quest based class so review using that.
Teaches the material clearly and concisely and is happy to ask questions. Homework is short and useful for the course. Exams can be somewhat tricky and ask students to fully understand the course material. Completely underrated as a math professor.
Prof. Kravchenko seems like he'd be an alright in-person professor, but he struggles in online format. Lectures are live, but he generally doesn't connect the concepts he's teaching to book sections. It's not always clear what exams will cover. Grade is mostly homework. Tests are only 12 (hard) questions. Lots of independent study needed for an A.
Take linear algebra in person if you can. It is really not a hard subject and it can be an easy A. I took it online and did not watch lectures because they kept putting me to sleep. You can still do just fine, but you may not want to do this because then you have to teach yourself the material for the HW/quizzes. He has an accent, but it is not bad
He's not a bad teacher, but his linear algebra class for CS majors was very theoretical. The tests were unforgiving (12 questions) and asked pretty much all conceptual questions. Thankfully, they don't weigh too much, but still felt too theory-heavy.
Prof. Kravchenko is a good lecturer and knows the material inside-out. Lectures can be a bit boring but I feel like that's just the nature of matrix math. Explains stuff pretty well and made sure to answer questions that were asked in lecture. Listened to the feedback after the first test and gave us an exam drop. Quizzes/exams very theory-based.
Very, very theoretical. Quest HW was manageable, but the T/F sections can be very punishing to get wrong. Quizzes and exams were the hardest T/F questions I've ever dealt with. I stopped going to lectures, read the textbook and watched Strang's MIT YouTube series instead, although some of the answers could be found in lecture notes.
I truly regret my time in this class. Kravchenko always felt not prepared for the lectures and disorganized. Exams and quizzes count for %54 of your grade and they're all multiple choices, meaning that there's no partial credit. Kravchenko doesn't bother to grade exams so he relies on the stupid multiple-choices. Take other professors if possible
A solid choice for M 340 L (CS). Lectures aren't mandatory but recommended. Lots of Homework (Quest and Written HW), weekly quizzes, and tests are worth most of your grade. He gives a decent curve and drops homework and quiz; he also replaces your lowest exam grade with your highest. Nice professor, answers questions well on Piazza.
Dr. Kravchenko is hands down the best math professor I've ever had. He's incredible at teaching and answers all questions. If you're having trouble on the homework, he'll walk you through it. Homework load is reasonable. Exams are designed so you don't make mistakes.
Kravchenko is not my favorite math professor but not bad either. Well-prepared for class but some explanations are unsatisfactory. Weekly Quest and written homework assignments are helpful in bridging knowledge gaps. Test are not too challenging but don't underestimate them. I received a 100 for participation despite not participating ever.
Kravchenko was so boring. Felt unprepared for lectures. He was hard to understand, mainly due to him talking so quietly. Lectures were disorganized. Quest and Homework assignments were SO MESSY and DISORGANIZED. Exams were difficult (only TRUE/FALSE questions) and EXAMS DID NOT HELP IN PREPARING FOR FINAL EXAM. Regret choosing Kravchenko for M340L.
Please, just take it with another professor
I don't think he cares a lot about this class. Class is very theory based, so I wouldn't take it if other professors are offering this class.
The other reviews are a bit misleading. Kravchenko understands the demographic of this class and as a result both you and him can get by putting in the minimum amount of effort. This class is very easy but also kind of worthwhile, I learned some math but I doubt this is anyone's favorite. The only downside is he sounds dead inside while lecturing.
Kravchenko's lectures are as plain as the topic content but sufficient. It's mostly basics of linear algebra concepts that ultimately shows up on tests in the form of very simple concept questions. Quest homework is similar (probably harder) to exams. He records lectures- review them on 2x and it should be a breeze.
Lectures were often unorganized, and we were just thrown equations and concepts rather than taught how or why they're used in the real world. Weekly Quest and written homework, neither of which were too difficult. The three midterms were pretty easy, but the final exam was extremely difficult for me.
Lectures are pretty dry and boring, but if you pay attention you can learn a lot. Tests account for most of your grade and are doable if you study ahead of time. The final was extremely hard though, much harder than the midterms. If you are able to learn by yourself with the textbook that is viable too.
He does have an accent which I cannot knock him for, but his explanations in addition to his accent are god awful. In addition to this, he assigns homework he hasn't taught yet, and goes over a miniscule amount of material during class. Also, he teaches like he just woke up and walked to class. He is not a very good teacher at all.
His lectures are often incomprehensible and difficult to learn anything from him in his class. only source of material is the textbook which is the worst textbook I've ever encountered.
His lectures teach you everything you need to know, and you only need to know what you are doing on the quests to pass the exams. The exams are easier than the homework, and are 12 question multiple choice.
It's as if each question asked means less time to complete the lecture and less time to complete the lectures means more of a chance to run class overtime and running class overtime means he can't get away from his students any sooner... TLDR seemed very annoyed by students, and the lectures were rather dull...
Tbh, the lectures suck - just skip them. They're boring and pointless since he has such a thick accent. HOWEVER, you can just skip and watch the MIT OpenCourseWare videos since the textbook's author does a much better job explaining (just google "gilbert strang linear algebra videos"). I watched the videos, kept up with the weekly HW, and did good.
He knows most of his students want to get by easily, so he gives easy exams. The homeworks are not difficult, but the most restrictive part of his class is his dry lectures. Overall, I would suggest this class for an easy linear algebra credit but would never take it again due to his boring demeanor.
Most of these other reviews are too harsh. Kravchenko teaches you basically everything you need to know for his exams and takes his time teaching all the concepts. He posts fantastic lecture notes, so you don't even need to go to class to do well. He's not the most personable guy, but the class is fairly chill and the tests are easy if you study.
Prof Kravchenko is a pretty horrible teacher. During lectures, he goes through proofs for pretty much the entire class and rarely does actual problems that we might get tested on. You will basically learn this course from the textbook and it helps to an extent. His midterms were difficult and his final was incredibly HARD.
HAVE PROOF EXPERIENCE BEFORE, class easy if so. Lectures are him proving big concepts + examples. Homework is using the concepts to prove smaller following results. Exams are like homework. Lecture proofs are just for your own enrichment, not tested, only final results. Can't really study for exams, just know major results and sharp proof skills.
Kravchenko isn't the most relatable or engaging professor, but he gets the job done and knows his stuff. His lectures are well-structured and uploaded after each session. He is a dry lecturer but teaches you everything you need to know. Midterms were extremely easy (easier than HWs), final was much harder (same difficulty as Quest problems on HW).
Kravchenko is pretty much as straightforward as it gets. His lectures are no fluff and just straight to the point. He can be hard to understand sometimes but everything you need for the exams is on the lectures. If you don't understand anything just watch the MIT videos on youtube. If you just try a little and attend the lectures you'll do great.
Getting an A can be trickier due to MCQ questions - missing 1 drops your grade by a point and an A is 94. A- is very doable. The professor clearly sounded bored at times but he explains everything that you need to know for exams. The class is plug and chug, but sometimes he proves equations which is nice. Do all the homeworks to prep for exams
Kravchenko is a brilliant professor that knows his Linear Algebra! Lectures do a good job explaining concepts and the why behind the formulas and facts. His answers to questions are really good. If you simply redo the Quest HW and understand why the facts and theorems hold, you're set for exams. 3Blue1Brown is also a good extra resource on YouTube.
Good teacher. 3 exams and a cumulative final make up the majority of grade, rest is the weekly homework. Exams are easy if you understand the material. Lectures are incredibly boring. No complaints, though. He gets the job done and you can get an A if you put in a reasonable amount of effort.
Not particularly engaging as a speaker, but perfectly fine to follow and covers topics in a very efficient and easy-to-understand manner. Homework relates directly to the exams and exam topics stay largely confined to the recently learned topics. Tests are fairly easy, but are very highly waited and have low question counts.
I dont know why the other ratings are so high for him. He is honestly the worst UT Austin professor.Literally no one shows up to lectures because of how much he yaps. Just do the homework and read the textbook and this class is literally free. I'm literally praying on this dudes downfall and hope he gets fired. I never wanna see that man on campus.
The class overall is very doable and with very little effort you can do rather well in the class. However, if you are someone that needs lectures to learn and aren't willing to teach yourself outside of class, this is not for you. He spends the entire lecture doing overcomplicated proofs that will cause you to struggle to learn the material.
Weekly homework but doesnt really help your grade because most of it is just exams, only 12 questions MC so not too bad but also means you'll fail if you get like 4 wrong, notes were pretty hard to read and he doesnt post lecture recordings but they dont really help much anyway. Used the textbook and online resources more.
No one attended lecture after the first week; I recall sitting in a completely empty row, realizing none of my friends pulled up. Exams are based on the UT Quest which in turn is fairly doable. You will learn a lot from the Quest. Written HW, not so much. His notes are hard to read and my group learned most of our stuff independent from class.
Not much content in the course we learned from him but at least it was really easy.
Rostyslav? More like Godstyslav. Study for the final though, it's harder than the midterms.
His exams are base on Homework and few question he suggested. His lecture is confused, fulled of proof that didn't help you study at all. Study homework , you will pass the course. study and be lucky , you will get an A. Better take other Prof. His TA didn't know how he grade the exam so go ask him directly.
Lectures were fast and hard to follow. Most people were able to get the material better out of the textbook or online. Homework was challenging but graded leniently. Exams were easy if you actually understood the underlying concepts.
This class isn't that hard to BS your way through, but Kravchenko is genuinely a terrible professor. His lectures are so unintuitive, rushed, and overall incomprehensible. Lin alg is an awesome subject with a lot of practical applications but we discuss none and focus on rote memorization. You'd be better off self-studying with 3Blue1Brown videos
He is a very chill dude. This class is conceptually very easy, but he isn't the best lecturer. However, there is a charm to him. If you review the homework problems you got wrong and fully understand every problem, its a very easy A (tests were 80% but super simple). If you don't like math and just need this class for credit, don't take him.
Lectures can be difficult due to the professor having an accent that is sometimes hard to understand but if you ask him to clarify he will do so. Content structuring is quite poor but if you ask questions (in class or out of class) you can get by. Exams are easy if you do all the practice given to you and all the homeworks. Textbook is important.
The entire lecture is completely unrelated to what you will be tested on. He has a strong accent, and it is difficult to read what he is writing on the board. You must read the whole textbook and put in hours of studying outside of class if you want to pass this class.
my king my glorious king i will oil up for you any day my glorious king
Prof Rosty is literally the GOAT. Even though he sounds like bored during lecture, don't take it personally he still answers all questions (even stuff from the homework and exam). The class is pretty easy if you attend or watch his online lectures, tests are pretty good. Just keep up with lectures and get used to his personality, super chill class.
He did not have to comment on my neurodivergent staring when I was asking a question about a glitched Quest problem. Other than that, if you do the Quest homeworks and the written homeworks, then grind Quest before exams, you'll be fine. The exams are multiple-choice and are sometimes verbatim taken from Quest, so...
His tests are all multiple choice so it can be quite daunting. On the plus side, the questions are very similar to Quest homework so review those before each exam. The final was slightly harder but doable. While his lectures may seem disorganized, he covers all the material you need for homework and exams so at least try and watch the lectures.
He's a good lecturer, slight accent but I didn't have any issues with it. Clears up some difficult concepts and usually proves them in an intuitive way. Homework is very easy, and exams are like homework. The grading is a little tough though, you need an average of 93% on the exams to get an A, and they consist of 12 MCQ, so only 1 wrong per exam.
Pretty straightforward class. Lectures are recorded and posted online, all exams are multiple choice. Weekly homework including a written and multiple choice section. Kravchenko knows this material very well and has taught this course a bunch, making this a smooth class with little to no issues. Overall good class.
Kravchenko just gets the job done. Don't expect too much. His exams are basically everything he does in lecture with some quest problems. Honestly just review the lecture recordings and the quest HWs and you should be fine. Good class overall.
goes very fast during lecture and does not explain the concepts very clearly. better to watch the lectures online than going to class. not a lot of guidance or study material, just quest and written homework. straightforward class but wish it was better structured
I'm not a fan of how Prof Kravchenko lectures. He moves along so fast that you don't even have time to think of a question or process the concept just taught. Only a few people show up to class since many watch the lectures online (or Khan) since it allows you to pause and actually understand what is being taught. Also, hard cumulative final.
Chill guy. His lectures are recorded, and his practice/homework lines up with the tests pretty well. Just do the homework properly and you should be set for the tests.
It's math so best way to learn is by doing the practices, I recommend doing the reviews on Quest. Final exam is weighted very heavily, so despite getting perfect grades all year if you goof on the final your grade can suffer.
the quest he assigns is a good measure of what is to come on the test. his lectures were okay at best and most of the time i would just go learn from youtube. the final is 35% of your grade so even if you do great all semester, you can still throw at the end. the written hw was never of use to me as well but its only worth 10%
Accent is very thick, posts lectures but not notes. Very easy to find yourself skipping this class, one time I went and there were 2 people. Tests are easy but the final is insanely hard. Dropped from an A to a B- so study hard
Thick accent, I had to resort to watching recordings to get the subtitles to understand what he was saying. Light-ish workload with easy midterms but insanely hard final with avg around a 60.
Cool guy but his lectures are mediocre and his homeworks either have nothing to do with the material you'll be tested on or are so easy they barely consitute practice. Theres no way to get familiar with the type of problems you will be tested on. I did not go to a single class after 2 weeks, read the textbook! With a reveiw this could be an easy A.
The class is not hard. Its not like calculus. Its more about your own determination to succeed. Its fundamental but shouldn't be so hard thus you can also learn outside of the class. Its not that bad.
Chill class up until the final. The 3 midterms are easy; if you can do the Quest, nothing should surprise you. But you really need to study for the final (35% total grade) if you want to keep a high grade—it's MILES more difficult. If you just want to pass, if you go in with a decent grade and bomb the final, the goat will probably still pass you.
Mixed opinions overall. He does his best to convey the material, but 3blue1brown does it much better. He's also fairly light on proofs, so it may not be good preparation for real analysis/algebraic structures. But WARNING: This is still linear algebra, and students still fail it very often, this professor being no exception. Come extra prepared.
The exams are not that difficult, however they contain very few questions. The final was actually a little difficult in comparison.
Chill guy, decent lectures but can be boring easy, just read up and spam practice quests and you'll be good
Not a hard class . 3 midterms + one final worth 35% of total grade. If you can do the quest problems you should be fine for those tests. Lectures are dense but all you need to master are the quest problem types and you should be straight.
exams are low question count so mistakes can instantly destroy your grade. Lectures were interesting but ultimately not that useful towards exams. good news is that exams are entirely "quest" based meaning that you can really just memorize the homework questions and do amazing in the course. zero practice available for exams besides the homework.
He's a decent professor, gets straight to the point during lectures and explains things fairly well, but goes a little fast at times. The questions on the exams are pulled directly from the homework, so if you can solve those, you'll be fine.
Very straightforward guy. Lectures are pretty useful and he uses lots of examples in class to solidify topics. Exams are taken directly from the Quest problems so if you study those you'll be fine. Final is cumulative of all the Quests and is fairly easy, but weighted 35%.
Kravchenko put in effort, lectures weren't super interesting but still recommend attending since it helps you learn more about what is expected in exams. The midterms were not hard, final was more challenging but all are doable if you study enough. Highly recommend reading the textbook and doing as much practice problems from it as you can.
Straight forward course & professor. Got a 100 on every assignment and exam. You can get away with skipping lectures (especially first half) and self learning via doing homeworks and quest reviews and getting the same score. First half of course is rather easier/intuitive, the other half was denser but became straightforward after homeworks.
The professor wasn't the best at teaching imo, I ended up basically teaching myself the entire course. Lectures weren't very helpful, I stopped going after like the 3rd week. Do the quests and you'll be good, all of the exams are just based on that. Overall not too difficult of a class, just lots of learning outside of class.
The class is just Quest homework and tests copied straight from the homework. I found the class material difficult personally, but many of my classmates didn't. I found his lectures difficult to follow, so I used online resources instead. If you do the same, I strongly recommend studying early and 3brown1blue's YouTube course, among others.
Despite visibly being hit with waves of suicidal ideation at the sight of a chalkboard, Kravchenko battles his inner demons to show up for his students. The sheer exhaustion of single-handedly carrying the UT math department on his shoulders makes him unable to stand on his own two feet, so give him grace: he will lean on the wall while lecturing.
Very sassy professor. Speaks fast and hard to grasp concepts in lecture or office hours. A lot of self learning, but the formatting is consistent. Just rely on quest for practice
Professor was hard to understand and follow, but once you get past the accent, he teaches decently. All exams were just the quests with different numbers. Take good notes, because his handwriting is messy. He goes over several quest problems during lectures, so its def helpful to go. He covers everything that is needed for the exams and hws.
The course isn't particularly hard, it's just a lot of tedious math. The professor posts lecture notes, and his lectures are rather boring, so one can rarely show up to class and do quite well. Tests are just homeworks with different numbers; nothing too difficult.
Professor Kravchenko is an alright professor. His exam questions are ripped straight from the homeworks with minor modifications at most, so doing well in this class is based on how well you understand the material present in the homeworks. However, to understand the material, you need to at least look at his notes (messy) or go to class (boring).
Didn't go to a single lecture after the first week. Midterm exams are just the homework with different numbers, and he releases solutions to the HW, so as long as you understand those you will be fine. The final is the same thing, but longer. Accent can be hard to understand sometimes and his class notes are messy.
he honestly wasn't a bad instructor. some people don't like him since they may find his lectures boring, but he isn't anyway terrible and does give effort into teaching. tests are basically some form of the homework, review that.
Lectures are boring and many skip them (he posts his lecture notes). Homeworks are pretty formulaic and based directly off the lectures; around 1hr per week. Midterms and final are the same problems from the hw. If you have a deeper interest in this kind of math, this class is not for you (very memorization-heavy). Otherwise, it's an easy A.
I didn't really go to class because I didn't find his teaching helpful. The content itself is not that hard. My biggest regret is definitely not studying enough for the exams. They are not many questions so getting a question wrong can be costly. I feel like if I put more effort into the class I probably could've gotten a better grade.
class was not super challenging in terms of content. homework graded pretty strictly so make sure you have your work shown thoroughly. midterms are easy and computation heavy, final is pretty difficult so make sure you do well early on.
his accent is rlly not that bad yall and he is super funny and a diva. i rlly enjoyed his lectures and his class is super easy to do well in since all the tests are based off of Quest. he has good notes and lectures and they helped me succeed quite a bit.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
6%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
-0.18 avg changeRatings by Course
M408D
3.4
(7)408D
3.3
(3)M340L
3.1
(81)M341
2.9
(11)M408C
2.9
(7)Difficulty by Course
MATH53580
4.0
M341
3.8
M408D
3.7
M408C
3.4
408D
3.3