2.7

Roye Templeton

Philosophy - University of Maryland, Baltimore County

2.7
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
75%
Would Retake
103
Reviews
2.7
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
2.4
Helpful
3.1
Clarity

75%

Would Retake

103

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

24

4

13

3

19

2

27

1

20

What Students Say

If he likes you he is nothing but nice to you

PHIL146 - 2.0 rating

Overall, probably the worst professor I have had at UMBC

PHIL146 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

71% confidence
Based on 7 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (4)
B (2)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(2)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 7 reported grades
A+: 4
B: 2
A: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (2)
Clear grading criteria (2)
Tough Grader (1)
Skip class? You won't pass. (1)
Gives good feedback (1)
Lecture heavy (1)
Participation matters (1)
Amazing lectures (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.13 avg change
Feb
Nov
Dec
Mar
Aug
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

146

5.0

(1)

PHILOSOPHY

5.0

(3)

PHIL300S

5.0

(1)

CRITTHINKING

4.0

(3)

LOGICALFALISIE

4.0

(1)
+16 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILSEX

5.0

CLASS146

5.0

PHIL1

5.0

PHIL104

5.0

PHIL332

4.8

Reviews (103)
1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Grade: A+
May 10, 2001

Do Not Take This Class, I promise it sucks.

4.0
3.0
PHIL146
Aug 29, 2002

philosophy of asian martial arts-great course

5.0
2.0
PHIL146
Oct 18, 2002

an excellent educator, really great

3.0
3.0
PHIL391
Oct 30, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PHIL334
Nov 7, 2002

very interesting class, everything was out of the book, he clarifis everything!!

2.0
4.0
PHIL146
Jan 6, 2003

Did not like the class or the professor

5.0
4.0
PHIL146
Feb 20, 2003

Great teacher! Most useful course I took in 16 years of formal education.

5.0
3.0
PHIL146
Feb 25, 2003

Excellent professor. Course was not particularly easy, but professor was willing to help on any detail that was unclear from reading material. very thorough

5.0
4.0
PHIL146
Apr 12, 2003

This guy is an institution at UMBC, has been teaching this class for years. Tough, but you learn a lot!

5.0
4.0
PHIL391
Apr 22, 2003

He is a very intelligent man and demands a lot out of his students. If you are not willing to stand up to the challenge, don't take his classes. BUT, if you want to learn from someone who knows what he is talking about, go for it!

5.0
4.0
PHIL146
Apr 28, 2003

this guy is amazing! Like a clenched fist raised in the air but wuth a velvet glove over the abrasiveness. Amazingly intelligent, can come up with on the spot insight like few people I've ever met in life. Great politics too,

4.0
4.0
PHIL146
Apr 30, 2003

Wierd guy, but great professor.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
May 13, 2003

one of the worst professors I have ever had.

4.0
4.0
PHL146
May 19, 2003

He Knows much about the subject but makes it hard for the student to learn. He does not let the students keep graded exams. His final exam for the course consisted mostly of matierial that we were never had an exam on and only studied briefly.

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
May 20, 2003

I hated this class and the teacher. He was very unhelpful and made it uncomfortable to ask questions. Tests were difficult and it was hard to learn from your mistakes as he doesn't let you keep graded quizzes.

2.0
3.0
PHIL146
Nov 2, 2003

This class really helps you to think logically. Some People find it difficult to understand just because they don't seriously think about what he is talking. If you just need the credit, don't take this class. This class is for intelligent ppl.

5.0
3.0
PHIL146
Nov 2, 2003

Excellent course. Learn how to think clearly and logically.

3.0
2.0
PHIL146
Feb 7, 2004

Teaching is clear yet offensive to many, but for 'Critical Thinking', its only appropriate, as he is really good at dispelling myths and fallacies in our thinking. HOWEVER terribly arrogant and unapproachable! Makes fun of questions/issues raised in cl

2.0
3.0
PHIL141
Feb 24, 2004

No Comments

2.0
4.0
PHL146
Apr 6, 2004

What a angry man. Would not take another course offered by him. BTW, what is in that cup, coffee sure doesnt taste good after an hour and it wasnt steaming when he came in?

5.0
5.0
PHIL390
May 12, 2004

whoever doesn't like him because he's 'unapproachable', i say try harder. Don't look at just the exterior. He knows his stuff in Philosophy. Do your work and you'll learn a lot. He is actually very understanding.

5.0
5.0
PHIL146
May 15, 2004

Mr. T. is truly a teacher for intellects. People who have logical weaknesses are threatened by his assaults and take him to be mean. He wants you to think B4 you speak. NEVER EVER ask a question u didn't think about 1st! I spoke to him after class manytim

1.0
5.0
PHIL390
May 18, 2004

No Comments

5.0
5.0
PHIL146
Sep 21, 2004

One of the best classes I have taken here. Very helpful. Noticed a dramtic change in my writing ability. Take the class, sit in the back and dont say anything, ask a question after class. He is a really nice guy, still see him and talk to him all the time

2.0
5.0
PHIL146
Nov 18, 2004

Very hard class. Very hard professor. I'm a fairly intelligent person and this class was so innecssarily difficult, it was frustrating. Didn't learn anything. Dropped out with the other 3/4 of the class. Majority got 30% on quizzes. One freak of nature was getting A's. It's still a mystery.

5.0
5.0
PHIL390
Dec 14, 2004

No Comments

5.0
1.0
PHIL146
Dec 14, 2004

"Ah, I see there's a Ms. ---, who has dropped this course." ::looks at ---:: "What are you waiting for? Leave." <-- That pretty much sums him up. You'll love or hate him for the same reasons - I found his course extremely easy and very instructional. I've used the material often in biology courses.

4.0
5.0
PHIL146
Dec 16, 2004

Bottom Line: He knows his stuff and expects you to study & do the same. If you are religious it can be a challenging course that will either enhance or destroy your beliefs. Overall I learned a lot but this is not an easy class. In class he can be VERY condescending. Outside of class, he's great.

3.0
3.0
PHIL390
Jan 7, 2005

3/4th of the time we watched videos and very little lecture, but realy really hard exams. (Tip: Exam is the same for the past ...God knows how long semesters:) Gradign is different but fun. Good course to take. Personally a very nice person.

2.0
5.0
PHIL334
Jan 13, 2005

Awful class! Boring lecture and movies. Take lots of notes and write fast because he talks fast. USE THE STUDY GUIDE. Tons of reading and definitions (memorize all of them for the test)

2.0
4.0
PHIL390
Jan 31, 2005

All we ever did was watch movies that had nothing to do with class....he wasnt understanding at all...worst teacher i have ever had. DO NOT TAKE HIM!!!

3.0
4.0
PHIL334
Apr 28, 2005

Hardly teaches 20 minutes per class. The rest is all videos. Tests are from book and has nothing to do with videos generally. Class was so boring and since I had nothing else to do I found my girl friend in there. Grading is a little different than others,lets you take the test twice and averages it

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
Apr 29, 2005

If you are not a philosophy major, you will not enjoy him. A very old school professor who seems to memorize his class lectures from the 70s. Learn what is in the books for this class because he does not teach anything. Very difficult quizzes for a 100 level course. If you talk, know your facts!

1.0
4.0
PHIL391
Jul 10, 2005

No Comments

5.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY
Grade: B
Aug 24, 2005

The best professor I have ever had!

5.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY
Aug 24, 2005

I once saw him make a student weep openly with nothing more than the sheer force of his critical thinking skills. He was right when he did it, too.

5.0
2.0
PHIL146
Sep 7, 2005

Roye is one of those old-fashioned gentlemen. He expects respect and for you to follow directions. Phil 146 isn't that hard a class. Just do exactly what he says and you'll do fine. Also, he lets you turn work in very late, or take quizes or tests late too

3.0
5.0
PHIL
Sep 9, 2005

had him for logic and reason, he's really hard and really rude (but in a good way). didn't enjoy the class, but definitely enjoyed the way he humiliated students with his vicous rhetoric. if you have a thin skin...don't take the class...

1.0
5.0
PHILSEX
Grade: A+
Sep 18, 2005

No Comments

1.0
5.0
PHILSEX
Sep 18, 2005

He will eat you up and spit you out, but other than that he rules.

2.0
4.0
CRITTHINKING
Sep 22, 2005

Very difficult class and he didn't make it any better. He picked on me constantly. The latter half of the class he didn't teach, we just watched very boring videos. I ended up dropping the class.

4.0
4.0
LOGICALFALISIE
Oct 28, 2005

He's one of those pretentious atheist philisophy professors that doesn't let you argue with him. Either you need to be an atheist skeptic **** like him or else you fail. I AM an atheist skeptical **** so I got an A ;). I felt bad for those kids that disagreed with him though. Luckily his false arugment class was analytical. Anything abstract I would probably hate the guy. No room to argue. His way or the high way.

2.0
5.0
PHIL146
Nov 4, 2005

No Comments

2.0
4.0
PHIL
Apr 4, 2006

Worst teacher I have ever taken at UMBC!

2.0
3.0
PHIL390
Apr 27, 2006

don't ever be late. just reads his lectures out loud, probably straight from the internet

3.0
2.0
PHIL146
Apr 28, 2006

Just sit down, be quiet, and listen. Dont ask questions or he will make u feel dumb, and dont argue cuz he wont change his mind. Oh, and he wears his pants up to his chest.

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
May 5, 2006

Definitely one of the worst classes I took at UMBC. The quizzes in the class NEVER made as clear sense as you needed them to to ace them and likewise for his exams. He also went over material fairly quick so you never really understood what was going on. Monologue-type lecture only since he liked to be done suick.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Oct 31, 2006

terrible

5.0
3.0
PHIL146
Nov 10, 2006

This guy obliterates anyone who challenges him. He will help you if you need it. If you do what he says you will get an A. Cool guy, very sharp.

5.0
2.0
PHIL146
Nov 15, 2006

If you get on his bad side, BEWARE. Just sit in class, don't say a word, do the worksheets before class, and pay attention when he goes over them. Many quizzes = many chances to get a good grade. Class is usually over in 20 mins. If he does give a "lecture", it will be hard to pay attention becuase the topics are boring haha. He hates religion.

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
Dec 9, 2006

I have never taken a Philosophy course in my life and made the mistake of signing up for this one. I was angry that my counselor didn't suggest PHIL 100. There are many definitions to memorize in this class and the examples given on worksheets don't relate at all to those on quizzes. 10 quizzes total, 2 extra credit quizzes, and boring lectures.

1.0
4.0
PHIL332
Dec 13, 2006

An professor i know refers to this man as "The angriest professor alive." Terrible professor - no philosophy discussed only what HE thinks. Be prepared for sermons.No discussion encouraged. Rude to students. Tests are impossible. Does not curve. B is possible if you memorize the book. Lecture material account for ~12% of exams but you must attend

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
Dec 13, 2006

You have to already be able to demonstrate some critical thinking before starting this course. Most of the material is right off of his notes and fast short lectures. Attend every class, otherwise you will miss something. No tests, 12 quizes (+ 2 xtra credit quizes), thats all. Many people are intimidated by him, but speak up in class if you need to.

4.0
4.0
PHIL399
Jan 14, 2007

If you believe anything New Age with faith, you'll be in for a rude awakening -- you'll regret taking this class (as well as PHIL 146); you may even do poorly. [In fact, that's the MAIN reason people hate him! Most of the test questions come from the Schick & Vaughn text and he uses similar tests every time. He also offers a way for you to boost

2.0
3.0
PHIL146
Apr 24, 2007

No Comments

2.0
3.0
PHIL146
Oct 10, 2007

He hates believing in God. Class is usually over in 20 minutes. He wears his pants like Steve Erkel. His quizzes are failed easily. He makes you feel like an idiot if you ask any questions.

1.0
5.0
PHI146
Oct 20, 2007

This guy enjoys using class time to preach against religion. He usually ends class in 20 mins yet he takes attendance before the class starts at times. He devoted an entire 45 minute period to denouncing faith in God. He will tell you that any argument you make is a fallacy. Don't even waste time with this guy or with this course. Horrible!

2.0
3.0
PHIL146
Dec 27, 2007

The students who had the hardest time in 146 were also the most religious. You probably shouldn't take the class if you believe in god(s). If you do take it, don't argue with Templeton. It usually doesn't seem like he's right since he's no good at explaining why, but trust me, he is.

1.0
5.0
CLASS146
Apr 11, 2008

he is a good professor but his teaching techniques just don't work for me

4.0
3.0
PHIL100
Sep 1, 2008

I thought he was a good teacher but you need to pay attention, take notes, the usual and you'll do well.

4.0
5.0
PHIL146
Oct 5, 2008

Either you will love his class or hate it. I found the class interesting but had to work at a higher level than for my other courses. If you study, learn the material, and go to class, you will do fine. If you are someone who believes in religion or god(s) beware however that he is an athiest and likes to denounce religion, which is awsome to watch

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
Oct 26, 2008

Terrible instructor (he's not actually a professor). Rude, especially to those who are religious. Even I, an atheist, am offended by him. No opinion matters but his own, questioning it leads to ridicule. Discussion in general is rare, mostly just monotonous lectures. Tests are difficult at best, easily failed.

2.0
5.0
PHIL332
Oct 29, 2008

Phil. of Martial Arts: Interesting Idea. Highly opinionated and poorly taught. I just saw him dock 2 girls 3 pts for wearing a beret in class. If you think only how he thinks, you'll succeed. He won't send email alerts for cancellations, but when you ask when he's available, he says, "read the syllabus". He enjoys aggravating you. Be warned.

5.0
2.0
PHIL100
Nov 19, 2008

Took it during the summer. He is a very intelligent professors and knows EXACTLY what he's talking about. Arguing with him will get you nowhere because he is very dedicated to his convictions. Not a ridiculously easy class but if you have an even minor interest you will find the material interesting. The videos were a little outdated though.

2.0
5.0
PHIL146
Nov 22, 2008

Horrendous, worst I've had. He's a foaming-at-the-mouth athiest who spends too much time beating up on religion, which shouldn't be allowed. He really needs to be stopped. I could care less if you're atheist, but you can't just be intolerant without provocation. His test questions are too vague and he won't ever see your side of it. AVOID!

2.0
5.0
PHIL332
Feb 4, 2009

he is very annoying, wicked and bitter, hen is never ready to answer your questions or even show interest in how low the class grades are. the course was poorly taught and also has zero clarity about philisophy of asian martial arts. i would strongly advise not take this course if you don't have to.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Feb 13, 2009

Easily the worst professor I've had at UMBC or anywhere else. Completely unreceptive to questions asked in class ..he told one student to "look at his handout later" and refused to answer the question. Would it be too hard for him to actually make sure his students understand his long-winded ramblings? Inexcusable for a 100 level class.

1.0
5.0
PHL146
Feb 18, 2009

Doesn't know how to teach. Very bitter and does not like people asking questions. a student in the class asked him a question and he just look at the handout. I went to his office hours to ask him questions and he told me he doesn't like people asking him questions outside of class. Doesn't explain and he reads of the handout instead of explaining.

1.0
5.0
PHL146
Feb 19, 2009

I think he hates teaching. Always grumpy and He teaches this class as if we are in grad school. Doesn't explain anything. Only reads from the handouts. Even when you ask a question, he explain not in his words but from the handouts. This is 100 level class, he should know how to teach. Never take a class with him. You will waste your time.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Feb 23, 2009

Very strict. Has clear issues of insecurity. Immoral even though he teaches Philosophy.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Feb 23, 2009

Unapproachable!!! It seems like he really hates teaching...but then again I do not think he could be accepted anywhere else. Does not accept questions and will not answer them. Extremely arrogant. I saw him take points off a students quiz because he kept writing for 5 seconds after he said time is up. You have to be arobot to speak to him. Avoid!!!

3.0
2.0
PHIL391
Mar 13, 2009

Had him for Philosophy of Sex, I really like the way he talks very into the topic but wont answer any questions in class. Just read the book and you'll do fine, Exams are multiple choice with quotes right from the book. u can correct every exam if u like with open book for half credit on each correctly changed answer, this really helps u learn it

2.0
5.0
PHIL146
Mar 22, 2009

Do not take this class with him unless you absolutely have to. If you need a General Requirement, choose something else.

3.0
4.0
PHIL146
May 19, 2009

This guy scared the bejesus out of me. One day he asked (screamed at) the class to prove the existence of God. The hard core Christian in the middle of the 2nd row, wearing a Jesus tee, turned beet red. We were silent hoping that would hurry us through this long awkward moment. Tough class, be ready to get shaken up. I learn how to debate better :)

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
May 20, 2009

Don't take this class if you can take another. This teacher is vague, doesn't like to answer questions and doesn't take time to teach the material.

3.0
1.0
PHIL100
Aug 19, 2009

Easy, easy course. Pay attention, use the guide. Lets class out almost two hours early every day. But, you really don't learn as much as you would if it were harder. If you already have a good background inf philosophy this teacher will fill in the gaps.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Apr 17, 2010

This is the worst professor I have ever taken. Seriously. He is a liberal atheist, who has no respect for his students religious beliefs. He claimed that his intentions were not to try and convert anyone in the class. He insulted my beliefs every class. He said, and I quote, "Religion is a bad habit." The best part about his class was leaving it.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Apr 17, 2010

Bad professor. Very redundant, old, and senile. He served in Vietnam, and (I'm sorry to say) but probably suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. He comes into class with an attitude, yells at students who ask questions, and treats his students with the utmost disrespect.

1.0
2.0
PHIL146
Jul 6, 2010

I spent 5 years at UMBC and this is the only professor I can actually say was bad. Ridiculously arrogant. Ironic how 80% of the grade in a class called "Critical Thinking" is memorization of terminology you'll never use later. I would recommend reading or sleeping, but he docks a nontrivial amount of your grade for that. Bad teacher and person.

5.0
1.0
PHIL300S
Oct 14, 2010

Professor has easy testing method. He is straightforward and his classes are mostly lecture. He will call you out if you sleep or talk but if you stay on his good side he is a great asset to you as a professor. Grading is clearly explained and never changes.

2.0
5.0
PHIL146
Oct 16, 2010

Horrible instructor. Calls students "idiot" and frequently shows his dislike for the entire class. The first two quizes had ok scores, but after that, the average dropped to about 52%. Can't teach, expects people to know everything already.

2.0
4.0
PHIL146
Nov 6, 2010

This class is for someone truly want to learn not for anyone just going for the credits. He is highly intelligent but he tents not to break down the material and rather expect you to take time thinking. You have to be open-minded or you learn nothing.

2.0
5.0
PHIL332
Dec 4, 2010

Avoid. Attendance is mandatory, but barely anything from the lecture is on any exam. Instead the exams are almost entirely based on the readings, which you do not discuss in class. He basically hates you already and won't answer questions. He just reads his [boring] lecture and you go. I don't understand why he still has his job.

3.0
5.0
PHIL332
Dec 21, 2010

AVOID this teacher if possible. Exams are without a doubt way more difficult than they need to be and don't seem to test our (the students) knowledge of the material accurately. Turns simple and easy material into perilously difficult exams for no apparent reason.

4.0
2.0
PHI146
Jan 26, 2011

Don't be put off by all the bad ratings. I'd bet most of these are religious people and it is true that Mr. Templeton is a staunch atheist. Religion is a touchy hot button and will make it so a fair rating is impossible. Not hard material at all. If you can forget your way of thinking you may be able to learn something.

2.0
3.0
PHIL146
Mar 16, 2011

He is the worst teacher I have ever had. Clearly has no interest in students. Thinks the entire world is full of idiots. Guess what Mr., if you are so intelligent why are you a part time professor at UMBC? He is extremely arrogant and just plain rude but expects you to be polite to him at all times. I feel sorry for his relatives....avoid him.

1.0
5.0
PHIL146
Apr 18, 2011

If you're planning on taking this class, don't. The teacher is uncompromising and difficult. The quizzes are impossible even if you do study. Questions are frequently met with scrutiny and there is an air of tyranny at the front of the class. You will not pass.

4.0
1.0
PHIL146
Jun 12, 2011

Yeah he's an athiest and if it gets brought up in class he makes his opinion clear;I personally am a christian and found it a little annoying how close minded he was but has nothing to do with his competency to teach the class.Class was not difficult, if you have half a brain you won't have to study. Got an A w/ maybe 4hr time spent out of class

3.0
5.0
PHIL146
Oct 21, 2011

His class isn't easy. Whenever you take a quiz, you might as well just flip a coin to see if you passed/failed. He is an atheist. Who cares. That's his view; let him have it. However, I have found this course helpful in recognizing weak arguments, which I realized are everywhere. Take this if you're willing to study a lot(his lectures are boring).

2.0
5.0
PHIL1
Nov 28, 2011

Book is somewhat helpful though we didn't read over the whole thing.Only read description and examples.He hands out a lot of papers.He only has 3 extra credit quizzes.One wrong answer can end you up with -5 to 7 points.Not much half credit.I feel like the class is more on your opinion.Class mandatory.We get out after a half hour of class.Dont argue

2.0
5.0
PHIL104
Jan 30, 2012

Terribly hard class, even if you study the subject is very confusing and there is no black and white between different types of philosophical fallacies. Even if you do study absolutely everything (which takes a long time) you might get a C, or a B if you're lucky. Don't plan on getting a good grade in this or getting something out of it.

4.0
1.0
PHIL146
Mar 31, 2012

Completing the homework & studying for 30 minutes was all I needed to do per week. Though I failed a couple quizzes, the extra credit quizzes he gave were enough to get me over a 100% in the class. As long as you show up every day & aren't late you can get the extra credit points and get an A.

3.0
2.0
PHIL146
Apr 20, 2012

Templeton uses his text book, speaks clearly in lecture, and gives easy tests but these standards, while necessary, are not sufficient conditions to judge the quality of the professor. The problem is he is an egoistic man who immediately dismisses other people who disagrees with him, especially when the disagreement is reasonable.

4.0
1.0
PHIL146
May 8, 2012

He comes across as standoffish, though he is a really nice guy. He doesn't dismiss dissenting opinions, he encourages people to question what he has said. He does however dismiss opinions that aren't well thought out or are unreasonable. The class is relatively boring, but will not take up much of your time. Easy A.

3.0
2.0
PHIL344
May 14, 2012

Absolutely no interest or respect for the subject matter. Knows nothing but the textbook about it (very poorly written, do not expect to be examining any primary sources or religious writing. It reads like an elementary history book.) Intentionally vague in his questions, supports a blanket rejection of Asian thought.

2.0
4.0
PHIL146
Jun 1, 2012

Very boring class, he comes off as rude and pretty much against debate. If he likes you he is nothing but nice to you.This class required a lot of memorization. A lot of people dropped because of there poor quiz grades. He is a gentleman and expects his students to show the same respect. Requires more studying than i anticipated but i did learn.

2.0
3.0
PHIL146
Dec 13, 2012

Overall, probably the worst professor I have had at UMBC. He insulted multiple students and was pretty intellectually dishonest in debates and, especially, presenting religious ideas.

5.0
3.0
146
Feb 6, 2015

Mr. Templeton does not tolerate laziness, lack of preparation, does not coddle you, and does not provide positive reinforcement without merit. He requires you to be informed for debate; arguing your Google research is a non-starter. This class requires adult maturity for maximum benefit. Don't be a petulant entitlement turd and you'll excel.

5.0
1.0
PHIL146
Grade: A+
Nov 23, 2015

Great class!!! Great instructor!!!

2.0
4.0
PHI146
Dec 29, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Took his class twice my freshman year and was not prepared for all of the work. I actually did worse the second time around ... If you have a good memory and are looking to take a class that is straight memorization, this is the class for you. If you are looking for an easy A, don't bother.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
4.0
CRITTHINKING
Grade: B
Mar 21, 2022
Would take again

I enjoyed His no nonsense approach and you have to keep up.

Get ready to read
Gives good feedback
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
CRITTHINKING
Grade: A+
Aug 11, 2023
Would take again

Professor Templeton takes seriously the tenets of critical thinking as a means of living; he will not pay credence to fads or fallacies. He believes the classroom is a place for serious discourse and where all ideas should be challenged. If you don't actually want to think critically, don't take this class, you will be called out and rightly so.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY
Grade: A
Sep 7, 2025
Would take again

One of the best professors or teachers I ever had at any level. Dedicated to the material and expanding students worldview.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

71% confidence
Based on 7 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (4)
B (2)
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(2)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 7 reported grades
A+: 4
B: 2
A: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (2)
Clear grading criteria (2)
Tough Grader (1)
Skip class? You won't pass. (1)
Gives good feedback (1)
Lecture heavy (1)
Participation matters (1)
Amazing lectures (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.13 avg change
Feb
Nov
Dec
Mar
Aug
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

146

5.0

(1)

PHILOSOPHY

5.0

(3)

PHIL300S

5.0

(1)

CRITTHINKING

4.0

(3)

LOGICALFALISIE

4.0

(1)
+16 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILSEX

5.0

CLASS146

5.0

PHIL1

5.0

PHIL104

5.0

PHIL332

4.8

Similar Professors