2.6

Sally Charnow

History - Hofstra University

2.6
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
19%
Would Retake
87
Reviews
2.6
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
2.5
Helpful
2.6
Clarity

19%

Would Retake

87

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

18

4

13

3

11

2

13

1

32

What Students Say

It is simply the only thing she is interested in hearing about

HIST102 - 1.0 rating

She has very high expectations but has a hard time conveying them

HIST014 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (3)
A (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 8 reported grades
Not sure yet: 3
A: 1
A+: 1
A-: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (10)
Participation matters (8)
Tough Grader (4)
SO MANY PAPERS (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Graded by few things (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (2)
So many papers (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.69 avg change
Jan
Jun
Dec
Dec
Sep
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HST177109

5.0

(1)

HIS2

5.0

(1)

HISTHIST

5.0

(1)

HIS12

4.5

(2)

HIST012

4.3

(3)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HUHC0011

5.0

HUHCH7

5.0

HIST178

5.0

HUHC13

5.0

SPECIALTOPIC

5.0

Reviews (87)
1.0
5.0
HISTORY
Oct 20, 2002

Crazy grading, boring observations, avoid like a disease!

2.0
3.0
HUHC11
Nov 25, 2002

AVOID HER!

1.0
5.0
HUHC0011
Nov 27, 2002

Just run. Just run away.

1.0
5.0
HUHC11
Jan 1, 2003

she is horrible she is mean and oppinionated and grades without logic the worst

1.0
3.0
HUHC11
Jan 9, 2003

The Robin to Magnus's Batman. NOBODY liked her. And she was a horrible teacher

1.0
5.0
HUHCH7
Jan 9, 2003

Gives Ds for writing that gets As in every other class

1.0
5.0
HIST178
Jan 29, 2003

by the end of the semester you'll want to use your textbook as a projectile!

1.0
5.0
HIST178
Feb 22, 2003

Hard, inconsiderate.... Work that deserves a B will get you an F DO NOT TAKE HER

1.0
5.0
HUHC11
Apr 7, 2003

I would rather have a labotomy than take another class with her!!!!

1.0
3.0
CE
May 7, 2003

No Comments

1.0
4.0
HUHC11
May 7, 2003

as far as feminists go, she is by far one of the worst...don't take her class EVER, especially if you're male

1.0
5.0
HUHC11
May 7, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
HIS012
Jun 13, 2003

An unhappy wman, blinded by her hatred of Israel

4.0
4.0
HISTORY
Sep 4, 2003

If you've got a brain in your body she is an ace teacher. She doesn't suffer fools gladly and who can fault her for that? So she's opinionated about Israel and feminists - this is college, folks, you can be articulate too.

1.0
5.0
HUHC11
Nov 12, 2003

DONT EVERRR take her class!!!! especially if u are a male... she HATES guys... and really had grader... not to mention a huge ****... so basically save urself the trouble... and the bad grade and DO NOT take her!!!

2.0
4.0
HUHC11
Nov 12, 2003

Just one of those miserable professors, you know the type. Very unfriendly and looks down upon you if you don't know everything in the world. No qualms about insulting someone. Very unfair grader, definitely not on the same level as her colleagues.

2.0
5.0
HUHC11
Dec 4, 2003

SHE IS A DIE HARD FEMINIST. She hates the men in the class, does not explain your grades. And thinks she has more problems that anyone else in this world.

4.0
3.0
HUHC11
Dec 13, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
HIS
Dec 15, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIS
Dec 20, 2003

She is the worst f'in teacher I've ever had. She gives out at least 6 hrs. of hw a night...all reading. She expects you to write a paper a week, at least 2 main papers a semester, and read 5 books from cover to cover in a 3-month span.

1.0
5.0
HUHC13
Feb 2, 2004

First of all, understand that being male makes this class harder. Secondly, understand that every topic, no matter how unrelated, will ALWAYS, somehow link back to feminism and women's rights. Oh, and NEVER forget your book...

5.0
3.0
HISTORY
Feb 10, 2004

She is the best prof in the world, she freaking rocks, I dont know why all these "guys" hate her, Im a guy and aced her class 3 times, in 3 diff courses, and know of many guys that have also, perhaps these people were dumb jocks, of course they

2.0
3.0
HIS
Feb 11, 2004

Miserable, incompetent, and barely in control of her subject manner.

4.0
4.0
HUHC011
Feb 25, 2004

she doesn't hate men as much as everyone likes to pretend. it's just easier to claim that they fail because of gender rather than lack of work...

2.0
3.0
HISTORY
Feb 25, 2004

It's true she's a feminist, but she doesn't hate men, she hates herself, and she makes you suffer for it! I sometimes doubt her knowledge of history too.

5.0
4.0
HST177109
Mar 24, 2004

I'm a boy... Professor Charnow was my adviser... was never anything but nice to me... her classes were great... readings were great

4.0
3.0
HIST
Apr 23, 2004

makes subject matter interesting by tying it to current events....but be prepared to write

1.0
5.0
HISTORY
Apr 23, 2004

i hate this woman. she is a feminist and plays very very high favorites. I think that her teaching manor is horrible and i will never ever take another course with her involved in or around it.

2.0
5.0
WST001
May 2, 2004

she is awful! she expects you to participate but then just stares at you like you're an idiot when you're finished talking, it's a very uncomfortable atmosphere in a class that shouldn't be. she's a tough grader and extremely unfriendly and rude.

1.0
5.0
WST1
May 8, 2004

Don't EVER take her class. She is absolutley terrible! Her grading is totally unfair. You only do good when your "opinion" matches hers. She make you feel like an idiot. She keeps her classes 10-15 minutes late every day. She needs to be f

3.0
3.0
WST1
May 18, 2004

The class was fairly easy. She gives approximately 6-8 small papers (2pg response) to the readings, so yes you do have to read or pay really close attention in class and take notes. She is a hard grader (grammar & papers), but you can make it through.

1.0
3.0
HUHC
May 31, 2004

Insane. She's a raving feminist, and you had better be too or else. Watch out because she'll come in late every day complaining about traffic, but you better not be late or she'll start with the scathing comments. Oh and always holds class late too

3.0
5.0
HIST012
Jun 22, 2004

The most feminist teacher there is, turns everything into an issue against women. you read about 4 books during the semister. I was barely able to pull a C, only because i participated in class. Unless you're name is Hemmingway, don't expect an A on paper

5.0
4.0
HISTORY
Oct 23, 2004

Expect to read, write and analyze a good deal. If you are lazy or too stupid to appreciate historical scholarship, dont take her classes. Discussions are lively and very informative. She doesnt lecture, but you still learn a lot through participation and hearing your peers. Can you handle it?

1.0
4.0
HISTORY
Oct 24, 2004

I have no idea how students can defend this execrable teacher as if she were an upholder of "standards" or "real scholarship." That's not the problem. She's not all that hard, but she's an awful, narrow-minded, arrogant, hypocrite who uses the classroom to spread her pathetic political fantasies.

5.0
4.0
HISTORY
Nov 10, 2004

This prof. is amazing. I love her to death, because she is a great prof, enthusiastic about what she teaches, and is always there to help you out. Yes people did bad...but the people that did were usually lazy and deserved it, take her, she's really an amazing prof.

1.0
4.0
HISTORY
Jan 15, 2005

I can't figure out how this woman is teaching at a university. No difference of opinion allowed, and if you attempt to disagree watch out; she will make you feel lower than an ant. Also, a raging feminist, and goes off on odd tangents. AVOID IF YOU VALUE YOUR GPA!!!!!

3.0
2.0
WOMENSTUDIES
May 5, 2005

she is def arogant, but the material that she teaches is very interesting and makes sense. She is very knowledgable and knows what she is taking about. There is a lot of reading and papers which are annoying but other than that i think she is a good prof.

4.0
4.0
WST001
May 24, 2005

She is so mean! she doesn't value anyones opinion except her own. she gives students dirty looks when they talk and is just in love with herself. very tough teacher. 6 short response papers, 2 long papers, and hard mid and final. you also have to do a ton of reading and puts everyone on the spot to see who read. i dont recommend her. D-

4.0
3.0
WOMENSHIST
Jul 19, 2005

Just show up, do the reading, participate; you'll do fine. Listen to the woman before you judge her.

1.0
5.0
HUHC
Sep 1, 2005

Face it, if youre a guy or a not 'pro-feminism' girl, shes not going to like you and youre going to get a bad grade.

1.0
5.0
SPECIALTOPIC
Oct 12, 2005

No Comments

5.0
4.0
HISTORY
Oct 15, 2005

I am guy and she was really nice to me and everyone in the class. She is a great teacher and one that knows her stuff. Her class was VERY interesting and even now I use what I learned in her class. She prepared me and helped me to succeed at Northeastern and Harvard. TAKE HER classes! You won't regret it.

2.0
5.0
WESTERNCIV
Nov 1, 2005

Way too much work; too much expected of her students. If you want to be a history professor, this class is right for you. Stay away from her.

5.0
3.0
HUHC
Nov 7, 2005

She was excellent. She opened the lessons up for discussion and encouraged our writing, instead of putting the students down. My class was only once a week so it was a lot of reading, but it was always interesting and made for good class discussions.

1.0
5.0
HUHC
Mar 17, 2006

She is a terrible teacher.

1.0
4.0
HIS
May 12, 2006

Well, you'll learn nothing, and you'll get to hear her whine for an hour twice a week. Sound like fun?

5.0
3.0
HIST12
Dec 6, 2006

Prof. Charnow was genuinely interested in teaching us the material. If you want to be in this class, you HAVE to read. This is the only way you will understand and enjoy the class. Make sure to get on her good side. If you participate frequently, she will like you. The reading is heavy, but you will definately learn a lot.

5.0
4.0
HIST12
Dec 12, 2006

Prof Charnow is an excellent professor. If you like history, you'll love any class she teaches. She demands articulate and scholarly writing. If hate to read and write thoughtfully about history, you're going to hate her. If you have even a slight bit of intellectual capiblity or interest you'll love her.

1.0
5.0
WESTCIV
Jan 25, 2007

She is a horrible teacher. she doesnt teach anything, she just makes us sit in a circle in class and listen to her complain and crap. i had more reading to do in this class then all my others combined. and she took forever to return papers. if you want to get a good grade def. dont take a class with her you'll learn nothing and waste your time

5.0
4.0
HIST012
Feb 6, 2007

She is very intelligent, thought provoking and cares about subject matter. She grades fairly but normally teaches honors college and most kids think she is very hard. Must particpate and attend class and read novels to pass/learn. No textbook history through literature. Few assignments 3-4 5 page papers. All tests essay based. discussion based clas

5.0
3.0
WESTCIV
Nov 6, 2007

Easy teacher and helpful if you take the time to do the work

5.0
2.0
WESTCIV
Nov 15, 2007

very simple class. nice teacher although try and not to skip her class because she does take attendance. work is simple enough if you read and the class is usually interesting.

4.0
2.0
HIST12
Jan 22, 2008

Wonderful teacher. Can't wait to have her again. She does give work but if she sees you making an effort she will cut you some slack

4.0
2.0
HIST12
Jan 27, 2008

So glad to have her again this semester. If you are a fan of history and don't mind reading, what can be at times long, then she is perfect. She's great because she has the students sit in a circle and we always have interesting conversations. This teacher is perfect for all us history nerds. If you hate history, this isn't your teacher

3.0
4.0
HIST12
Jan 28, 2008

I did well, but be warned that you read sooooo much in this course, and she's not always clear on some directions. Lots of reading, weekly writing assignment, and projects that pop up out of no where. She will act like this is your only class at Hofstra. She's very smart, but at times she takes the class to unhealthy level of seriousness.

5.0
3.0
HIST12
Jan 28, 2008

I am not sure of the class information so I just put 12. I have her for a night class and I must say she really knows her material. She appears to be nice and she already warned us that we read alot. She seems to be great for history buffs like me.

5.0
2.0
HIS12
Jan 29, 2008

I took this with her when I was a freshman. I'm not a history major in my junior year. I must say she was one of the best in my freshman year. She made Western Civ interesting and didn't make it a class that I dreaded. The only con is that there is going to be a ton of reading so try and get it on Tues/Thrusdays.

4.0
1.0
HIS12
Jan 30, 2008

I do not like history courses. I am a science and math nerd so to say. I've read people complaining that she gives too much work and what not. All she gives is reading. It is not that bad even. It's not even bad if you take her on a Tues/Thrusday cause she gives you ample amounts of time for the reading. I highly advise you take her.

5.0
2.0
HIS2
Mar 14, 2008

She is a great history professor! If you enjoy history course, she's the right one to get.

3.0
4.0
HIST014
Nov 2, 2008

FYC Womens History class. Lots of reading, groupwork & papers. the class is basically a lot of discussion by students, none of whom want to say anything because no one wants her to say that theyre wrong when expressing their opinion. It was an OK class. not my cup of tea. I really enjoy her as a person, not as a professor though.

3.0
5.0
HIST14
Mar 30, 2009

i did not like her teaching styles at all. if you want to take an easy class do not take her because there is a lot of writing. although the material was quite interesting her class was horrible to sit through. if you do not participate or come in late she will not like you

4.0
4.0
WST001
May 15, 2009

I loved my women's studies class, but I am glad that Prof. Rosenthal was also there. Prof. Charnow seems hard edge, but once you chat with her a little bit and get to know her, she's really not bad at all. Plus! she has friends in the city and she got me interested in Jennifer Miller and I got to see a performance in the city. I loved this class!

4.0
4.0
HIST101
Sep 30, 2009

She likes people to have their own thoughts...don't be rude but if you make a thoughtful arguments she appreciates it because it means you're thinking about assignments. I am convinced I got an A because I disagreed with her while everyone else just nodded their heads and agreed with everything she said. Tough but fair and perfectly nice.

5.0
4.0
HISTHIST
Sep 15, 2010

Professor Charnow is a great professor. She will really work with you and help you with your writing as long as you show her that you are putting in effort and that you are interested in the material. I found Professor Charnow to be remarkably fair and kind to all her students, regardless of sex or political preference. She rocks!!!

3.0
5.0
HIST014
Oct 30, 2010

She makes you write more than your writing class probably does. She isn't understanding. I truly do not like her at all.

3.0
5.0
HIST014
Dec 6, 2012

I wish I could say nice things about Professor Charnow because I know she is really a good person, but I can't. If you do not participate every time she asks a general question or write exactly in the way she wants, she will automatically assume you never read and put no effort in. She has very high expectations but has a hard time conveying them.

4.0
3.0
HIST020
Dec 17, 2012

The class was not what I thought it was going to be at all. The most we did about the present was have current event articles, the class itself was mainly about imperialism. She also had a unique way of teaching - by reading novels and primary sources. Still as long as you showed up and paid attention and participated, it wasn't too difficult.

1.0
5.0
HIST102
Dec 15, 2013

No matter what class you take with this professor, remember to focus all your work around the French or Jewish culture. It is simply the only thing she is interested in hearing about.

3.0
2.0
HIST102
Dec 31, 2013

So at first I was scared of Professor Charnow, but I needed to take this class, and she was the only professor that would let me take with honors, I worked hard, and got an A- in the class, not going to lie not the easiest A-, also I am a history major so this helped me out as well. She does not like slackers.

5.0
2.0
HIST012
Grade: A
Apr 28, 2014

Arguably one of the best professors I had freshman year. Caring and understanding about situations as long as you show her that you're trying in the class. A lot of readings, can manage if you don't read, very relaxed classroom setting.

1.0
4.0
HIST014
Oct 25, 2016
Wouldn't take again

She sometimes plays favorites, and defiantly can hold a grudge. Also, she tells you how the work won't be too heavy, by that she means reading 150 pages in a couple of days and writing book reviews that will never be good enough.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
5.0
HIS012
Feb 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Had for for one day, knew I was in for an awful semester, and switched out. Best decision I ever made.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
4.0
HIST020
Apr 4, 2018
Wouldn't take again

The worst professor Ive ever had during my time at Hofstra university. She has a horrible attitude and if you ask a question she makes you feel dumb. She should not be allowed to teach.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
4.0
HIST020
May 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She is extremely rude! Work was really tough especially if you aren't good with history Suggesting you stay away

Tough Grader
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
HIST020
May 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

By far the worst history teacher I have had. She showed no ability to engage with the class and it felt like she never cared about teaching from beginning to the end of the semester. She relies on everyone to read from the vast amount of books she requires you to buy some of which have little significance in the course. Overall shes awful.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
3.0
HIST020
May 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Absolutely awful professor. I would never take her class again. She changed the name of the course, and I wound up taking a history class I didn't even sign up for. She barely taught anything and she assigned many different books to read that did not relate to the overall theme of the course. Overall she was a terrible professor.

1.0
4.0
HIST014
Oct 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She needs to watch Game 5 or a Jet game once in a while.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
5.0
HIST102
Dec 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

You work toward a huge research project throughout the semester, writing book reviews and drafts throughout the semester. You also read several novels and discuss them in class. Do not skip class because more than half your grade ends up being based on discussion.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
SO MANY PAPERS
4.0
4.0
HIST14S
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 2, 2019
Would take again

Prof Charnow LOVES to give papers. She is a tough grader. I won't say she gives F's like popcorn. She does have the tendency to lecture frequent but not ALL the time. If you hate to read thick packets and books, then she is not for you. As a person, she is absolutely amazing. I had her for two semesters for my 1st year, person: great; teacher: poor

Get ready to read
Participation matters
So many papers
5.0
4.0
HIS012
Grade: A+
Jun 23, 2019
Would take again

Professor Charnow is by far the best professor I have ever taken. Yes, you have to work for the grade, but this is college. Grow up, and do the reading. She is so kind and caring. She has changed her schedule to help students who cannot make her office hours. Truly an amazing scholar and mentor.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
5.0
4.0
HIST102
Grade: A-
Jan 4, 2021
Would take again

Professor Charnow is a real gem of a teacher, her historical knowledge is absolutely amazing. Lots of reading, but she assigns books and articles that are insanely interesting. My one wish is we could have spent more time focusing on our final paper. Overall amazing class, very inspiring.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Inspirational
2.0
4.0
HIST020
Grade: B
Jun 8, 2021
Wouldn't take again

She is a very nice lady, she always gave extensions on the papers if needed but she is a super hard grader. She believes everyone is a history major and expects everyone to understand history and the readings at a history major level. She doesnt clarify things well either. You read A LOT. Sometimes she thinks this is the only class students have

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
HIST020
Dec 14, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Charnow is one of those professors who expects you to already have prior knowledge of the subject matter she is teaching. She never had a clear grading rubric, and she never posts grades to Blackboard. Very much reading heavy and if you keep up with the reading you'll be fine. Also very condescending, makes you feel stupid asking questions.

Lecture heavy
So many papers
Tough grader
2.0
3.0
Hist109
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 1, 2022

Professor Charnow knows her stuff; very ineffective and conveying it. She gives too much reading for such intervals, assigns papers based on our thoughts then tell us we are wrong for including our own opinions and knowledge because it wasn't in the readings. When you ask a question, she finds a way to make you feel dumb for even bothering.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
2.0
2.0
HIST014
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 10, 2025

She's real nice but just a little selfish and not very understanding. There is a required textbook that I had downloaded online for free as opposed to buying it for $60+ in the bookstore. She was upset by this and suggested that everyone had a physical copy of the book. We're already paying tuition and have other textbooks to buy. Digital is fine.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
HIST014
Grade: Incomplete
Nov 10, 2025

Personally I feel like she was just rude and acted extra at minor inconveniences that don't even matter.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Graded by few things
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (3)
A (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 8 reported grades
Not sure yet: 3
A: 1
A+: 1
A-: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (10)
Participation matters (8)
Tough Grader (4)
SO MANY PAPERS (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Graded by few things (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (2)
So many papers (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.69 avg change
Jan
Jun
Dec
Dec
Sep
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HST177109

5.0

(1)

HIS2

5.0

(1)

HISTHIST

5.0

(1)

HIS12

4.5

(2)

HIST012

4.3

(3)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HUHC0011

5.0

HUHCH7

5.0

HIST178

5.0

HUHC13

5.0

SPECIALTOPIC

5.0

Similar Professors