3.7

Sam Melkonian

Mathematics - Carleton University

3.7
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
59%
Would Retake
93
Reviews
3.7
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
3.6
Helpful
3.7
Clarity

59%

Would Retake

93

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

41

4

17

3

17

2

9

1

9

What Students Say

I found it much easier than 2007 and Melkonian is a great prof

MATH1005 - 5.0 rating

Great prof, if you do the textbook problems and whatever examples from tutorial, you should be fine

MATH2007 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

11%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 26 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (14)
Not sure yet (6)
A- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(16)B(2)C(3)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 33 reported grades
A+: 14
Not sure yet: 6
A-: 3
A: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (9)
Clear grading criteria (7)
Lecture heavy (6)
Test heavy (6)
Respected (5)
Graded by few things (5)
LECTURE HEAVY (4)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.70 avg change
Mar
Apr
Dec
Apr
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

114

5.0

(1)

375

5.0

(1)

3705

5.0

(1)

69104

5.0

(2)

69204

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

MATHA1005

5.0

MATH3007

3.3

69375

3.0

ENGMATH

3.0

MATH1005

3.0

Reviews (93)
5.0
4.0
69375
Oct 5, 2001

No Comments

5.0
3.0
69104
Oct 10, 2001

Don't ask stupid questions. "It's trivial to do."

5.0
1.0
114
Feb 7, 2002

Cool teacher. He speaks clearly and teaches enough in a class. 'unique solution'

3.0
3.0
69375
Feb 20, 2002

man.... wtf is a Taylor series?

3.0
2.0
69375
May 17, 2002

No Comments

5.0
2.0
69104
Aug 8, 2002

never had any notes with him...knew the course like the back of his hand!

3.0
4.0
69375
Aug 9, 2002

My favorite prof so far over 2 years of eng. This guy knows his stuff TOO well.

5.0
2.0
69204
Aug 21, 2002

very nice prof, good notes, amazing how he writes notes without a book in hand!!

5.0
2.0
69208
Nov 7, 2002

very good professor. good notes, good lectures.

5.0
2.0
69208
Feb 1, 2003

I can see why he doesn't use a textbook; his notes are better than the book's

4.0
3.0
69375
Feb 27, 2003

Too smart that if you ask any question, you will look like an idiot. He has the whole text book memorized. Tests arn't bad at all.

5.0
3.0
69375
Oct 6, 2003

IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND A SINGLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIS NOTES AND WAHT HE WRITES ON THE BOARD, PRETTY AMAZING HUH?!

5.0
2.0
69375
Jan 4, 2004

Good prof. Extremely smart, knows his stuff. I'd recommend

5.0
3.0
ENGMATH
Feb 2, 2004

He's one of the best math profs out there! Modest and smart man. One prof I definitely respect.

5.0
1.0
375
Apr 8, 2004

This man never makes mistakes. The only professor I've seen teach without ANY notes. He even memorizes examples!

5.0
3.0
MATH3705
Apr 25, 2004

Don't take this course with anyone else. Show up for every lecture. Frighteningly smart. No hidden agendas, no ego. Definately one of Carleton's best.

5.0
1.0
MATH3705
Jul 6, 2004

Excellent professor

5.0
1.0
MATH2008
Aug 12, 2004

the best prof at carleton

5.0
2.0
CALCULUS
Sep 26, 2004

Had him 9 years ago and thought he was the best. I see things still haven't changed! Excellent explanations, always ready to help, and tests that are very fair.

5.0
2.0
3705
Oct 12, 2004

i think sam and ata khan are the same person, but i can't prove it

5.0
3.0
MATH3705
Oct 22, 2004

Possibly the smartest man I've ever met, great prof

5.0
3.0
MATH2454
Oct 27, 2004

Really good professor. Very, very clear. He chugs along in his lectures though. Definitely not too fast, but if you get lost somewhere and stay lost for a few minutes, it's hard to get back on board the Melkonian train. But then you can just read the notes you took and it all makes sense.

5.0
2.0
MATH2454
Dec 15, 2004

Definitely the best prof I have this term.

3.0
2.0
MATH3057
Jan 3, 2005

TOO MANY NOTES!! Good Guy, but can't absorb any information in his classes due to the excessively large amount of notes. But good prof overall.

2.0
2.0
MATH3057
Jan 27, 2005

He needs to learn that, though it's impressive to spout notes from memory, the students are not learning, as the same can be done by reading the textook. He needs to teach math intuitively and allow the technical details to be understood through the textbook. Very straightforward tests and exams.

3.0
2.0
MATH3705
Apr 26, 2005

Math Genius. He has the ability to write his notes by memory at an incredible pace. However, he tends to drone on like a robot on crack. If you can't keep up, just read the textbook - nearly the exact same notes.

2.0
2.0
MATH3705
May 5, 2005

Smart guy, but he doesnt explain stuff and just writes the book on the board. Youre better off studying on your own and not going to class

5.0
1.0
MATH3705
May 15, 2005

This guy rules! His testing cannot be more fair, just do the problems in the book and you can easily get an A or A+. With this guy what you see is what you get, only thing is his lectures are very hard to follow. However since his testing is so fair, who cares? Dont get me wrong though, his tests arent easy.

4.0
1.0
MATH2454
Dec 14, 2006

I really liked him! No textbook, but that was great! He gave problem sets that really prepared you for tests! Tests were easy, but the course does require studying, as they all do, really. Genius, and really, really nice; don't be afraid if the material seems hard in class; he won't test on that stuff! Hope I have him again.

5.0
1.0
MATH1009
Dec 19, 2006

This guy is incredible at math. He really knows his stuff, and will try to help you understand it as well. He sometimes forgets that we don't have Ph.D.'s in Math, but he's still one of the nicest guys you could meet. Buying the text was a waste of money...DON'T BUY IT. Just study his notes and the examples he gives. Tests and exams are super-easy.

3.0
5.0
MATH1005
Apr 30, 2007

His teaching style is more suited for senior students rather than first year students. He can be really overwhelming with all the stuff he throws on the board in one lecture. He needs to ease up in the lectures, most students can't learn from an hour and a half of non stop note writing.

1.0
5.0
MATHA1005
May 1, 2007

i studied 4 weeks before the final exam spent 400 dollars on tutors and ended up failing the class and then I find out that the dean is bell curving marks and for some reason the teacher can not show me the final exam avoid this teacher do not be fooled by what you have been told by other student i was fooled and here i am. he told me to change prg

1.0
4.0
MATH1005
Jun 15, 2007

His lectures are useless. The only thing he does is writing on the board. Never explains , just reads what he is writing. His notes are not clear as he goes from step one to step 5 without explainig how he got there. His tests are not that easy but if you do the suggested problems you will be fine.

2.0
4.0
MATH1005
Sep 10, 2007

The only good part was the adjustable weight of the final. He does not teach well. He blows through material like he only has 5 days to live. He does tons of examples in class but doesnt really cover how to do them. He runs this course like you already know the material. If you have him I hope you are really good at learning from only the textbook.

5.0
3.0
MATH1005
Apr 2, 2008

Best prof ever.

5.0
3.0
MATH1005
Sep 11, 2008

Awesome professor. Does plenty of examples to convey knowledge. Teaches entire class from memory perfectly. Easy to learn and understand unless you are inept in math.

5.0
4.0
MATH1005
Sep 13, 2008

Learned everything my previous prof failed to teach in the first 5 minutes of class #1. Incredibly easy to learn from!

5.0
1.0
MATH1009
Oct 3, 2008

Easy especially you read all and copy all of his notes and work on his suggested question you will get an A easily

4.0
5.0
MATH2454
Oct 25, 2008

You getting a good grade got nothing to do with the fact that he is smart as mentioned here. In fact, his class goes on without decent explanation,non-stop.He assumes that you just know everything if you copy down his notes as he writes,and reads what he is writing.

5.0
1.0
MATH1005
Feb 9, 2009

Very Knowledgeable and approachable. I must say that it is also very impressive how he is able to teach whole lectures by memory.

5.0
1.0
MATH3705
May 9, 2009

Sam is the man! He is a beast when it comes to math. His class seems very hard because he just powers through the material. However, as long as you study his notes very well, the tests and exam are all easy. He usually throws only one tricky question per test, but the tricky question is actually from the notes. So study the notes and you'll be fine

4.0
2.0
MATH1005
Jun 16, 2009

GREAT teacher. I actually WANTED to do good in this class because he was so great. Although I do recommend touching up on Calculus I before coming to this class (since I did poorly, and resulted in a low mark for both classes). Very enthusiastic teacher and grabs your attention.

4.0
1.0
MATH2454
Aug 6, 2009

awesome awesome awesome study the notes you will be very fine

5.0
3.0
MATH1005
Aug 9, 2009

THE one and only professor for any of your math needs. He knows it all, and he teaches with a fist of steel and the wisdom of the Budah. If you respect yourself as an engineer, mathematician, or a student, you will take his class. Plows through the material like its his breakfast, and while you might think you understand nothing, you'll know it all

4.0
2.0
MATH3705
Mar 26, 2010

He has nice eyes LOL. Anyways, he's a good professor. I had him for MATH 1005 as well. For this class, I barely went to lectures because the course textbook was written by him, and I'd find that the notes in the text vs. the notes in the lectures were the exact same. So I prefer leaving all that writing somewhere else and studying from the book.

3.0
2.0
MATH3705
May 16, 2010

I dont know why every one says he is good, but here is the real fact, from day one all he does is write on the board, and he is basically writing his own book again, he goes extremely fast, so you either write up to his speed or just pay attention of what he is writing, the course material is a bit tough but his tests and final are really easy

5.0
2.0
MATH3705
Feb 14, 2011

good teacher, articulate, and knowledgeable

4.0
3.0
MATH1005
Mar 4, 2011

This professor makes AMAZING notes. He never looks at his notes, just starts writing on the board. He is VERY knowledgeable in math. But, if you are attending class, a word of advice: don't stop copying. He writes very fast.

4.0
2.0
MATH3705
Apr 6, 2011

God of Differential Equations

5.0
1.0
MATH1005
Sep 9, 2011

You could not ask for a better math teacher. Regardless of whether he regurgitates his notes from a book he may or may not have written, its flawless - concise, organized and more than thorough. Consider yourself lucky if you have him for any class period.

5.0
4.0
MATH3007
Dec 10, 2011

I master of his trade.

4.0
3.0
MATH3705
Dec 18, 2011

Lectures could not be more dry. He was even less interesting than a textbook.

5.0
1.0
MATH3007
Sep 29, 2012

Very easy to pass his course~ he's always smiling~

1.0
2.0
MATH3705
Grade: A+
Apr 27, 2015

While this professor's ability to reproduce the entire textbook on the board from memory and do it at an incredible speed is impressive, it makes taking notes in class completely pointless. Your notes will be nearly identical to the textbook, except that the textbook will be very slightly more thorough.

3.0
5.0
MATH3705
Grade: A-
May 5, 2015

He basically notes down every single thing similar to the textbook on the board and he is not really good at teaching. He teaches fast without explaining thoroughly as if you already know the materials in advance. many others dislike his teaching method as well. honestly, I skipped the lectures and studied the book and could manage to get A-.

3.0
1.0
MATH3705
Grade: A
May 13, 2015

His lectures can be long and boring (his lectures are basically the same as the textbook) but if you read the book, do the problems then you will pass. The concepts from the book are not hard so I just studied from the book and didn't attend most of the classes and in the end got a good grade.

3.0
3.0
MATH1005
May 26, 2015

The course uses a book that he himself wrote. He ends up copying the book on the board. I stopped going to the lectures after the first 2 classes, and still did very well on the course. Tests and exams are pretty straightforward.

3.0
4.0
MATH1005
Jan 19, 2016

To be honest I would rather recommend reading the whole book and understand it by myself than to go to his classes. He literally just copies everything exactly from the book and puts it on the board. He writes so fast that u can't catch up with him. His handwriting and voice are not clear if u sit in the back

5.0
3.0
MATH1005
Grade: C+
May 6, 2016

Excellent prof, know's the subject through and through

5.0
2.0
MATH1005
Grade: A-
Jun 21, 2016
Would take again

Amazing Teacher if you like learning from the book and also his test are exactly like the ones from previous years. If you have his past test you are go into the exam with at least an A.

2.0
3.0
MATH1005
Grade: A+
Jul 16, 2016
Wouldn't take again

He knows his material, and I did well in the class, so I guess I can't complain too much. Differential equations is easy and he does explain it well. Series was harder and he doesn't explain it well. I learnt series on my own, online. I had friends describe him as "the most uninteresting man in the world." He wasn't really interested in lecturing.

5.0
1.0
MATH2007
Grade: A+
Dec 19, 2016
Would take again

Great prof, if you do the textbook problems and whatever examples from tutorial, you should be fine.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
MATH1005
Grade: A+
Jan 19, 2017
Would take again

Had the option to do this or 2007, long story short ended up taking both during my career here and I can say if you are given the option to do this with Melkonian or 2007, definitely take this class! I found it much easier than 2007 and Melkonian is a great prof. He pretty much sticks to the textbook and will provide old exams to study for final.

3.0
5.0
MATH1005
Grade: A-
Apr 20, 2017
Would take again

He's a living textbook. He wrote the textbook and the way it is written is the way he speaks and writes. He is extremely intelligent and concise; a great academic but a terrible (by it's most primitive definition) teacher. Not one of his lectures I came out with any understanding. (You think i'm kidding...) If you are a self teacher you will be OK

Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
4.0
MATH3007
Grade: B
Jan 11, 2018
Would take again

He writes everything "word by word" on the black board and briefly explains it. You have to come to class to take note because it will be everything and only thing you need for your tests and final exam. Don't skip class and expect to find the solution online. He will give you a prev final exam, be sure to learn from it before going to your exam

Respected
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
2.0
4.0
MATH3705
Jan 24, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Basically writes the textbook (that he authored) on the board, from memory, at blistering speed. He seems very knowledgeable but if you are looking for the prof to teach the material, I would keep looking. If on the other hand you like learning from the textbook well you aren't missing anything in the lectures so he's your guy.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
MATH1005
Apr 20, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He wrote the textbook for this class and just writes it on the board, word for word. Honestly, I stopped going to class after 1 month and still got away with good marks on the tests. If you have someone who can teach you the concepts or are a self-taught learner, there's no point in showing up.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
3.0
MATH3705
Grade: A
May 7, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He recites his textbook in his lectures and it's difficult to understand the examples he writes on the board. It's easier to learn directly from the textbook.

1.0
4.0
MATH3705
Grade: A+
Jun 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I didn't attend a single lecture after the first week. He has written all the textbooks for this course and others and just rewrites the pages onto the board. Just read the textbook and take notes from that, much easier to understand. I made cheat sheets for each chapter and then took practice tests. Exam was super easy and comparable to old ones.

Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
2.0
2.0
MATH3705
Grade: B
Jun 26, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He seems like a nice guy but he's a boring prof that only does the minimum. In class he will literally just write out his textbook on the board with no extra details or examples. Do not bother going. It can be an easy A if you study and do the assigned problems from the textbook.

Respected
Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
4.0
4.0
MATH3007
Dec 14, 2018
Would take again

Gives you practice problem and solutions. Gives too many proof that you are not responsible for. It is nice, but it takes time away from important stuff that you will be tested on. Cancels last class to give you break which nice. Overall a good teacher and nice course.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
MATH3007
Dec 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

You literally cant blink in the lecture as he writes super fast, also, he is rude sometimes. The material is heavy even though if you study hard you could get a good grade he just isnt an awesome teacher you would go to class write a huge amount of stuff then go home. he explains briefly and talks while writing so you have to focus on both.

Tough Grader
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
1.0
MATH3705
Grade: A+
Mar 19, 2019
Would take again

Not a very difficult class but it seems difficult initially. The problem with this professor is that the lectures are theory heavy and it's incredibly hard to keep up with him in class and you leave the lecture confused. BUY THE BOOK and instead of going to class spend time learning from the book, go to the tutorials and you'll be fine.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
MATH1005
Grade: A+
May 13, 2019
Would take again

He wrote the textbook and his lectures are word for word of what the textbook says. Attendance not mandatory. He is sometimes hard to understand because he has an accent and speaks very quietly and fast. Wastes lots of time showing proofs and stuff you don't need to know. Tests are fair and straightforward, no trick questions.

Respected
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
MATH3007
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 22, 2020
Wouldn't take again

He reads off his lecture notes WORD FOR WORD. It makes going to his lectures a pain because you leave with little understanding. His tests have a lot of questions. He started throwing 1-2 gotcha questions that were worth THE MOST. On the exam, everyone failed his written portion, to which he completely discounted it. That's why he has a 3 rating.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
MATH2007
Dec 26, 2020
Would take again

Excellent prof, very concise and to the point, lectures were pre-recorded so you can pause if you didn't understand something, posts notes and leaves enough room on them so you have room to write. Best 4 out of 5 tests count , exams were fairly easy with no trick questions and all open book. If you do assigned problems, it's an easy A.

Clear grading criteria
2.0
2.0
MATH3705
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 13, 2022

I am a big advocate for attending every single lecture no matter how useless they may seem. This course has made me reconsider that philosophy. 2 hours monthly with TA > 12 hours monthly with prof

4.0
3.0
MATH2008
Grade: A+
May 6, 2023

Prof is ok, only downside is how he teaches, which he writes on board what he speaks word for word. It was ok for the first half of the course, the second half it was harder to understand. But at least the TA was awesome, the final exam was super easy still given a 3 hour block enough for me to achieve an A+ as someone very good at math.

Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
MATH2008
Grade: C
Aug 17, 2023

Quite Rude

Tough grader
5.0
2.0
MATH3007
Grade: A+
Mar 4, 2024
Would take again

Easy test and easy Exam, if you put effort in it, you will do well in the course. Although the course can be challenging, also had a sample exam. Very helpful. the best advice for this course is that before the exam, study on everything on ALL the test.

4.0
2.0
MATH2008
Grade: A+
Apr 24, 2024
Would take again

MATH2008 W24. 45% Tests, 55% Final, Best 3/4 Tests. The lectures are okay, he just reads from the lecture notes he has which he also posted online. The tests and final exam are really easy, it's clear what comes and there's not much pressure. You need to have access to a textbook though and you might have to buy it. Content is not that hard.

Clear grading criteria
Test heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
1.0
MATH2007
Grade: A+
Dec 23, 2024
Would take again

MATH2007, Fall 2024. 45% Tests, 55% Final, Best 3/4 Tests. The final was all multiple-choice and was similar to the practice exam he posted. All of his tests were scaled-down questions from his lectures and were simpler than questions in the textbook. His lecture notes are clean and all you need for the class (lectures are not required to attend).

Amazing lectures
Graded by few things
3.0
1.0
MATH2007
Grade: B+
Dec 24, 2024
Would take again

His tests are much easier than other calc 2 profs. Wasn't a big fan of his lectures and ended up learning most of the content from Prof Leanord's series.

1.0
5.0
MATH2007
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 26, 2024

literally no point in going to the lectures. he is literally a 1 for 1 copy of the textbook and just writes it on the board, study really hard for the tests and exam. exam was 20 multiple choice questions which sucks if you don't know how to do something cuz u don't get part marks. don't recommend this teacher find someone else. trust me...

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
MATH1104
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 3, 2025
Would take again

Course was amazing despite people saying he's just a textbook reader (which he is but he more than makes up for it by explaining everything well). His tests are average difficulty and tutorials are very beneficial. The exam weight might look daunting at first but this professor is more than willing to help prepare you for it.

Get ready to read
Respected
Test heavy
1.0
3.0
MATH1104
Grade: D
May 1, 2025

Writes on blackboard for the whole class and mumbles without explanation and his so called lecture notes are word for word out of the textbook

3.0
2.0
MATH1104
Grade: A+
May 31, 2025
Would take again

Prof. Melkonian's lectures consisted of reading notes directly from the textbook, then writing them on the chalkboard. This made lectures quite boring; if you cannot learn like this, choose another professor. Will happily take time to answer any questions you have. Exam/tests were easy, and the review before each one was exactly what was on them.

Caring
1.0
4.0
MATH1104
Grade: C+
Dec 8, 2025

Notes are extremely wordy, information heavy, and almost directly copied from the textbook (reading the textbook was more helpful). During lectures he literally copies the notes (which are online) directly onto the chalk board with little commentary. Awful teacher, quite a waste of time to show up to class

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
MATH2007
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 11, 2025
Would take again

Stopped going to his lectures after the first week. However, his lecture notes were completely fabulous. Self-study-able and elegant proofs / lecture material, really organized. He has basically rewritten the textbook in condensed, well-structured format.

4.0
2.0
MATH2007
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 15, 2025
Would take again

All lecture notes are available, clear criteria, no surprises on exam

Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
MATH2007
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 17, 2025
Would take again

I personally enjoyed the teaching style. Professor Melkonian often built up understanding before presenting topics making concepts easier to grasp, and he emphasized understanding over memorization in his lectures. All the content on the brightspace was also well organized and made it easy to study for tests as the criteria were very clear.

Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
MATH2007
Grade: A+
Dec 19, 2025
Would take again

The textbook lectures notes are good, but the prof just reads and says the exact same stuff from them every class while writing the exact same thing on the board, so its just better off to skip the lectures in my opinion. On the bright side though, the tests were fairly easy and final exam was very similar to the practice exam he posted.

Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
MATH2007
Grade: A+
Dec 22, 2025
Would take again

He seems like a good prof, however, I only went to one lecture the entire semester. In that lecture, he literally just reads from the notes, therefore, I read all the lectures on my own and did all the practice questions, and ended up getting like 95% in the course. He seems nice though!

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

11%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 26 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (14)
Not sure yet (6)
A- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(16)B(2)C(3)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 33 reported grades
A+: 14
Not sure yet: 6
A-: 3
A: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (9)
Clear grading criteria (7)
Lecture heavy (6)
Test heavy (6)
Respected (5)
Graded by few things (5)
LECTURE HEAVY (4)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.70 avg change
Mar
Apr
Dec
Apr
May
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

114

5.0

(1)

375

5.0

(1)

3705

5.0

(1)

69104

5.0

(2)

69204

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

MATHA1005

5.0

MATH3007

3.3

69375

3.0

ENGMATH

3.0

MATH1005

3.0

Similar Professors