3.1

Samuel Wong

English - University of Victoria

3.1
Quality
4.0
Difficulty
63%
Would Retake
84
Reviews
3.1
Quality
4.0
Difficulty
3.1
Helpful
3.0
Clarity

63%

Would Retake

84

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

21

4

21

3

10

2

17

1

15

What Students Say

To start, my friends and I attended every class, and love English, so we were involved and did the readings

ENGL200A - 1.0 rating

Hands down one of the worst professor i have had for my entire school career

ENGL125 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

48%

Textbook Required

75%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 21 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
A- (5)
B- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(4)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 23 reported grades
A: 7
A-: 5
B-: 3
B+: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (9)
Accessible outside class (7)
Tough grader (7)
Lecture heavy (6)
Gives good feedback (5)
Graded by few things (5)
Amazing lectures (5)
Amazing lectures (4)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.66 avg change
Dec
Jul
Nov
Dec
Apr
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGL201

5.0

(1)

ENGR110

5.0

(1)

ENGRA01

5.0

(1)

ENGR110120

5.0

(1)

366B

5.0

(2)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENGL115

5.0

ENGL125

5.0

ENGLISH366

5.0

ENGL201

5.0

ENG145

5.0

Reviews (84)
4.0
3.0
ENG135
Nov 20, 2003

God bless him, he's a really nice person, but his lectures go on and on and on and onnnnnnnnnnn.....when everyone already understands he doesnt stop!!! It's painful and he makes me feel the need to drink a whole keg after class.

4.0
4.0
135
Dec 10, 2003

Drags on and on? True. Classes unbearably difficult to attend? You bet. But he is fond of English, and a true intellect. To give him some credit his analytical skills are very good and he can make complicated pieces understandle. he makes me want

2.0
3.0
ENG135
Dec 12, 2003

I couldn't get out of there fast enough. His lectures were boring, and he was an irrational marker. He told us time and time again to not do something on our essays, and when I didn't do it, he stated that I should have. NOT recommended.

3.0
3.0
ENG135
Dec 13, 2003

I honestly think he has obsessive-compulsive disorder. He's either over or under medicated. (head scratching every 2 seconds?)Class is so boring that he makes church seem like a rave. Stay at home ppl-u wont learn a thing.

4.0
3.0
ENG135
Jan 5, 2004

Although he's very helpful nice guy, his classes are dull. If you don't have some natural talent with writing this may not be the class to take. He likes things his way or the hiway, but sometimes it's hard to know what he wants and what he dosen't.

1.0
5.0
ENG135
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Mar 3, 2004

Really, this guy is very irrational. Never say what he wants to see in our essay, and extrmemly hard marker. Endless boring lectures, nothing helpful. Avoid him by all chance!!

1.0
5.0
ENGL115
Jul 5, 2004

He sucks!!!!It's so true that he's a hard marker. Avoid him for your own goodness.

1.0
4.0
ENG135
Nov 4, 2004

he sucks!!!!! he doesnt explain****! his lectures have nothing to do with the course and the assignments he gives are never well explained. If in your in this class and you can get out-Do it NOW....if not you get get an F on a simple essay, when previously having been a straight A student.

2.0
4.0
ENG135
Nov 14, 2004

I like his class and I would have walked away with a good impression if it weren't for the assignments. He is a crazy maker and is not clear what he wants at all. If you are in his class, make sure to go to his office and talk to him before handing in ANYHTHING!

3.0
4.0
ENG125
Nov 19, 2004

Honestly! You guys are being way too hard on him. What you need to do to do well is simply to follow his instruction. Go to his office hours and he will definitly help you improve your grade. Over explain everything and KEEP TO THE GUIDELINES OF THE ASSIGMENT!

2.0
5.0
ENG135
Nov 19, 2004

Very Bad Teacher!!! Says one thing, marks the opposite way! I would do anything to aviod this prof! If you have him next semester drop the class, find another class -- I wish I still had that opportunity.

1.0
5.0
ENG135
Dec 4, 2004

HE is brutal!!!! Honestly drop the class if you are in it. I can't say enough about how terrible he is. Marks WAY too hard for a 1st year course, and is a geek. Drop the course now!

5.0
2.0
ENG125
Dec 5, 2004

His course is not the easiest, but if you don't act like a wallflower and actually engage with the class it's not bad. On the whole, just DO WHAT HE SAYS and you'll do fine. If he says don't talk about the poet in the essay, don't talk about the poet or you'll fail. It's not rocket science...

3.0
4.0
ENG135
Dec 15, 2004

He is a really good prof except he marks way too hard. He's approachable and nice and you can learn a lot with him. He seemed better than these ratings when I first took the course but he is definately too difficult of a marker. If you want to learn at the expense of a grade, he is good.

4.0
5.0
ENGL125
Dec 15, 2004

obviously well educated, but unclear about his expectations.concentrates primarily on the meaning of peoms and prose during lectures but expects students to concentrate on syntax and structure in essays.if you want to pass essays go to him in advance with a draft and ask for help.unforgiving marker!

2.0
3.0
125
Dec 15, 2004

it simple, write an essay the way he explains and dont do anything else, he is not clear but you can get a good mark if you do it his way

4.0
4.0
ENG125
Dec 22, 2004

He is a hard but reasonable marker. He gives very thorough and legitimate comments after marking each assignment which I found helpful in improving my following essays. I learnt a lot from his class and I felt that the poems and short stories we studied were thoughtfully chosen.

2.0
5.0
ENG125
Jan 8, 2005

Such a hard marker!!!!! I was an A student in English before taking his class where I never recieved a mark higher than a D. Never gave any positive remarks on any one of my papers, every comment was a slap in the face. Would never take a class with him again!!!!

4.0
3.0
ENG366B
Jan 29, 2005

The above comments may be influenced by their youth (all first year), but I'm about to graduate this semester (English Major). Shakespearean "Tragedies and Histories" was memorable for his passion, experience, and effort. He knows his material, and is a captivating speaker. Buck up, kids!

1.0
5.0
ENGL125
Feb 16, 2005

Arbitrarily hard marker... uses personal biases. Little understanding of his own subject matter or assignments. Gives pedantically explicit assignments, and then changes the requirements at the last minute. Absolutely inappropriate.

2.0
4.0
ENG125
Mar 18, 2005

His expectations are unclear.If you are in his class, make sure that you go to his office hours.He is an absolutely unforgiving marker.I am an English major and I took his course after recieving A's in several 200 level Englishes and I got a C in his class(not for lack of effort).I don't recommend h

4.0
4.0
ENG125
Nov 14, 2005

I have never liked english, or been very good at it. I can see why some 1st years find this class hard, but as a 3rd year, I loved it. The articles and essays you read in this class are super interesting and challenge you thinking. What he wants from you in your essays is clear and if you stick to the guidelines set out, it's hard not to do well.

1.0
4.0
ENG366
Grade: B
Dec 10, 2005

The worst prof I have had in 4 years of English courses. Vague, over reaching and spastic I took to counting how many times per class I had to hear "did anyone notice?" -- not only that but his brief digressions always lasted 50 mins, leaving no time for actually covering the material. nice man, bad teacher

3.0
4.0
ENG366
Jan 3, 2006

Okay so i figured out how to get a good mark. before the essays and exams, go to his office hours and listen to him talk for ever. Even though it may seem pointless, it will help you out. He only wants to hear his own opinions.

1.0
5.0
ENGLISH366
Jan 28, 2006

self-absorbed, opinionated SOB. should seriously reflect on why he has chosen this career path.

2.0
4.0
ENG366C
Jan 29, 2006

AWFUL. He covered seven plays without explaining them at all. Also, he's a dick for details, and gives tests that are completely irrelevant to the course. He assigns paper topics that belong in first year, but marks in a ridiculous fashion, docking a full letter grade for something other profs would take 2% for. Bah!

3.0
4.0
366C
Feb 19, 2006

My primary complaint has to do with his demeanor. He comes off as b*tchy and arrogant. I agree that he is an exceptionally hard marker. I have the odd feeling that he enjoys seeing his students twist in the wind. Overall, his class was a negative experience for me.You'll survive it, but probably won't like it.

5.0
3.0
ENG201
Sep 23, 2006

Engaging and brilliant. Open to student's ideas and perspectives, but willing to engage in debate which is very refreshing. Truly helped me to understand the literature we studied. I found him to be humble and funny.

5.0
4.0
ENG135
Nov 16, 2006

Amazing. I couldn't disagree more with most of the comments on here. Clear about how to read academic material critically and write about it properly. Extremely knowledable and a great sense of humor (albeit a bit 'off') extremely helpful if you ask for it. Solid marker, great feedback. Would take not only him but class again in a heartbeat!

4.0
3.0
ENGL135
Dec 7, 2006

Great prof, very very interesting, he really knows his 'stuff'. Would for sure take another course from him again.

2.0
5.0
ENGL366B
Apr 10, 2007

He really knows his material, but is a ridiculously hard marker and focuses on stupidly nitpicky details instead of looking at the play as a whole. Worst mark, and hardest english class ive ever taken in four years of english. I would not recommend him. If i get A's on shakespeare papers with another prof, then i dont deserve C+'s and B-'s with him

5.0
5.0
ENGL201
May 3, 2007

Enjoyed it more than I thought I would. I hate modernist poetry, but the Joyce and Beckett lectures made up for Eliot and Stevens. Only hangup is the difficulty for an "intro. to modern lit" class. I found upper level modern lit courses equally if not less demanding which seems misleading to the poor student giving modern lit a first try with Wong.

1.0
5.0
ENGL135
Dec 17, 2007

if you want a failing grade... take this class!

4.0
5.0
ENG135
Mar 27, 2008

Wong is great at what he does and actually got me interested in poetry and prose. Gives mostly interesting lectures, although he is a verrrry hard marker.

1.0
5.0
ENG201
Apr 9, 2008

ahhhh worst prof i have had in 3 years of university. marks ridiculously hard, lowest mark BY FAR on my transcripts. only teacher i hae ever gone to for help, and it was useless. he is well educated, but a horrible teacher!! killed my interest in modern lit forever.

2.0
5.0
ENG125
Apr 10, 2008

He wrote the exact same comments on two of my essays. He is a ridiculously hard marker and is far too critical of writing styles. I hated this class because of him. He knows his stuff but wrecked my gpa.

3.0
4.0
ENG125
Apr 17, 2008

I have never heard use the word "curious" so often in so many ways. I didn't like him. Yes, he writes lengthy comments at the end of your assignments, but they are useless and unhelpful. I just went to look at the final marks for our class this term and there were no As, no A+s, 2 A-s and 3 B+s...how are people supposed to maintain GPAs with that?

2.0
4.0
ENG125
Jun 10, 2008

Some great insight but overall hard to keep up with. Not easy to ask for help, he just repeats what he already said. Not very flexible with his availability. One of my least favourites.

3.0
5.0
ENG145
Jun 25, 2008

zomg i got pwnd in his class! Im so used to getting As and A-s in english but i saw the darkside of english in this class.. oh well.. his tough marking just made me work 1000 times as hard so i guess its a good thing that i took this brutal class,

1.0
5.0
ENG145
Feb 10, 2009

One word: Riggggggggggght?

3.0
3.0
ENGL366
Aug 3, 2009

Challenged me to think for myself. He sometimes goes on journeys but that was never an issue for me. He was available for me, helped clarify issues I had with my papers and was kind to simple grammatical errors. I signed up for another of his courses just because he was teaching it. Although I never broke out of A- I'd take his class again.

2.0
5.0
ENGL125
Sep 10, 2009

He's a bit of a joke. He thinks he uis so smart and literally shoots down sutdents oopinions in class. Hands down one of the worst professor i have had for my entire school career.

5.0
5.0
ENGL200A
Dec 12, 2009

Really enthusiastic about the middle English literature - it's probably his specialty. Helpful and introduced a lot of stuff that I don't think a lot of other teachers would have. Really glad I took this class, and made me -love- the subject matter.

5.0
3.0
ENGL135
May 5, 2010

A very calm character who often brags about his famous contacts, his "intelligence", and how ungrateful we are to have his majesty S.G. Wong as class instructor. Somewhat harsh grader , he basically grinds you to the point that you give your all.

4.0
5.0
ENG135
May 9, 2010

Mr. Wong teaches a tough class and is a hard professor. Coming into Eng 135 straight out of highschool I would NOT recommend this class from Mr. Wong without previous university english experience. That being said, he is very available during office hours and is very passionate about english. Not recommended for a first year student. Second = ok.

4.0
5.0
ENGL200A
Jun 20, 2010

I am an English major and a published writer. I have NEVER struggled in English, but I did with Wong. He will DESTROY your GPA. To be fair, he's very clear about how hard he marks, tells you exactly what to expect, and is an entertaining professor. Just prepare to struggle for mediocrity- There is no excelling with Wong.

4.0
4.0
ENG366
Nov 28, 2010

Prof. Wong is great at what he does. He expects a lot out of his students, but in an encouraging, respectful way. He really pushes his students to engage themselves with the text and strive to enhance their understanding of the material. Admittedly, he is a very difficult marker, but always includes typed and in depth comments to returned papers.

5.0
5.0
ENGR110
Dec 5, 2011

Sam expects you to be ready to learn when you step through the door. If you don't read the weekly readings, he will find out and humiliate you in front of the class (in a nice way). He is a hard marker, but a fair one. He is more than willing to help you if you ask for it. Knows what he is teaching and is hilarious..I would totally take him again

3.0
4.0
ENG366B
Dec 27, 2011

I took Samuel Wong's Shakespeare class. He was a fair marker, and included a typed note attached to each essay to explain why each student received a certain grade. The readings are mandatory if you want to do well. So is attending the class. Sometimes his lectures are a bit confusing, but overall I enjoyed him as a prof.

5.0
5.0
ENGRA01
Nov 18, 2012

Hard. I took AP English and thought I was good -- my marks didn't reflect that.

2.0
5.0
ENGLI366C
Dec 18, 2012

Arrogant and talks about fluff in the plays, mostly focusing on the plot. I reduced his lectures to several stock sentences. He highlighted the comedy in some of the plays (which is sometimes difficult to catch when just reading the play) but that's about it. I did not learn a thing.

5.0
3.0
ENGR110120
Jul 3, 2013

Hard but fair marker. Provided clear instructions and feedback for assignments. Best English teacher I have ever had.

2.0
4.0
ENGLISH366C
Oct 20, 2013

Terrible - in personality and as a prof. All he did was recount the plot of the plays and he tries to embarass students if they haven't read quite up to the page he assigned (something I'm never embarassed about). Won't help you in office hours either; he'll just go off about whatever he wants to talk about.

4.0
4.0
ENG366
Nov 26, 2013

Samuel Wong is a great teacher IF you actually want to learn something. His essay marking is tough but fair and he manages his class time very well. If your interest does not lie in the literary world, don't waste your time or his.

4.0
4.0
ENGL366B
Apr 13, 2014

Wong is an alright professor but I got the same material from Sparknotes as his lectures. Make sure you attend classes as he will threaten to hold your grade without documentation... but won't tell you till the final!! His marking is hard but he warns you about this. Be wary and come prepared.

5.0
4.0
366B
Jul 10, 2015

Professor Dr. Wong gives clear, inspirational, and amazing lectures. If you can find the time to attend his office hours, he will give you in-depth and life-altering discussions about Shakespeare's comedies, histories, and problem plays. He may not pretend you know what you're talking about when you don't, but your "mettle is always being tested".

4.0
4.0
ENGL369
Apr 10, 2016

Professor Wong is a great teacher. His lectures are interesting and funny, and he's always willing to give help and clarify when needed. His marking is hard but fair, and he gives each assignment plenty of useful feedback. However, don't take his class if you expect to get away with not doing the assigned reading!

5.0
3.0
ENGL366
Grade: A
Jun 6, 2016
Would take again

Wong is so awesome. He love Shakespeare an alarming amount and always gives entertaining lectures. I went into this class thinking I would hate it because historically Shakespeare has not been my favourite. But it actually ended up being my favourite English class I've taken at UVic!

1.0
5.0
ENGL200A
Oct 18, 2016
Wouldn't take again

To start, my friends and I attended every class, and love English, so we were involved and did the readings. The midterm he gave us had nothing to do with the course we took, was flabbergastingly difficult and was extremely unfair to the students. I quite literally cried in class during the exam, although I spent LOTS of time studying.

5.0
3.0
ENGL200A
Dec 1, 2016
Would take again

seriously enjoyed this class. The materials were good and the professor was as well. He says at the beginning of the term that he will randomly call on students (which at first really freaked me out) but he can tell if you don't know and he most likely won't call on you. No attendance but show up to class the tests are based on what he says.

Hilarious
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENGL200A
Dec 9, 2016
Would take again

Amazing, interesting lectures which make you think. I would take every class with him I possibly could. The highlight of my schedule!

Inspirational
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
ENGL146
Grade: B-
Feb 22, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Tough grader and incredibly boring lectures. Lots of reading, but that's mostly just because of the class. Opinionated about the readings and DO NOT challenge him on them. Doesn't go well. Not a bad guy, but not a great professor.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
4.0
366B
Grade: A-
May 15, 2017
Would take again

I went into this class not stoked about having to take a Shakespeare course, & now I'm wishing UVic offered more! Samuel Wong knows just about everything there is to know about Shakespeare and his lectures are filled with energy. Do the readings and be prepared to be called on in class! He marks hard but if you put in the work you will get results

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Inspirational
5.0
3.0
ENGL200A
Grade: A-
May 18, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Wong was a great prof! He's energetic, clearly knows a lot about medieval lit, and was always on time and prepared for the lectures. Was very passionate about the subjects and was funny too. Mid term was 100% short answer and final was short answer with an essay, he gave out the topics before hand. Very easy. Just pay attention in class.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
366C
Grade: A-
Jun 20, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Wong is an awesome professor, although he is a tough grader and his tests are rough. We had 2 essays, a short review & the final in this class. One of the best profs I've had in terms of lectures- you can tell he is super passionate about Shakespeare and provides really interesting and provocative commentary. You need to read in order to pass.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
ENGL135
Grade: A-
Jan 10, 2019
Would take again

Professor Wong's lectures are fast-paced and engaging. He was incredibly approachable during office hours and gave clear expectations for assignments throughout the course. I would strongly advise first-year students to take courses with him, as he was the best professor I had through my first semester at UVIC.

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
5.0
3.0
ENGL135
Grade: A
Jan 10, 2019
Would take again

Samuel is the absolute goat. Loved the way he spoke about academic writing. He genuienly makes you feel as though you are a part of the 'academy' in which the course is directed upon. He is not a tough grader if you put in actual effort to write decent papers, and he definately understands his students' writing capabilities. Would defs take again.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Inspirational
4.0
4.0
ENG366B
Grade: A
Apr 24, 2020
Would take again

Very solid choice. Knows everything there is to know about Shakespeare. Tough grader on your papers though. Need to make generous use of quotations.

Accessible outside class
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
ENG146
Apr 24, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Tough grader, attendance mandatory or he basically fails you, all my other grades were fine within this semester except w/ his class, hes super nice as a person but didnt like him as a prof and quite opinionated in regards to literature, lectures are really boring - especially given covid, he didnt seem to understand students struggles imo.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ENG135
Nov 17, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Had him for first year, first semester and this is where my anxiety for school truly started. I experienced ableism with him because I had to leave early for class due to a disability that isnt visible. That was truly traumatic for me, Im in 3rd year now and Im scared of all my prof because of him. Worst experience ever. Truly discouraging.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
ENGL330
Dec 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

From my experience, Dr. Wong was fine. You definitely need to be good at paying attention, his lectures are long and can seem dry if you aren't paying attention. Allowed flexibility on his final paper which I liked, but definitely get ready to read more than most english classes.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
366C
Grade: A
Jun 21, 2022
Would take again

Samuel Wong is arguably one of the best profs I've had at UVIC. However, he knows what he expects from you so be prepared to follow his instructions and if you don't understand ask him. Two things to be aware of: he WILL call on you in class, and you'll have to get used to a prof who doesn't use slides if you're taking Shakespeare with Wong.

Get ready to read
Hilarious
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
ENG366C
Grade: B+
Sep 7, 2022
Would take again

Dr. Wong is excellent. For this class he used an online text so we did not have to purchase any materials. The final exam was difficult as you have to identify specific passages, but if you read the plays it is fine. His lectures were very interesting.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
ENGL330
Grade: A
Dec 4, 2022
Would take again

Professor Wong is one of my favourite lecturers! I could listen to him go on and on for hours - very insightful! He creates courses that are super engaging (Utopian Fiction, Horror Literature/Film). Usually 2 essays (~1500 words each about motifs, worth 35% each) and a take-home final (30%). Would recommend taking just about any class he offers!

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
ENGL460
Grade: A-
Dec 21, 2022
Would take again

Dr. Wong was excellent. He provided scanned copies of all readings (most of which were under 10 pages) but there is reading daily. We were graded on four essays, with the lowest mark dropped (no final!). However, there is no clear rubric for the essays. His lectures were very interesting and engaging, and he was always available outside class.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
4.0
3.0
ENSH101
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 4, 2023
Would take again

very good teacher, his lectures are top tier. however i had issues with his attendance policy (if over 4 absences you automatically fail the class), especially since it's flu season. ignoring that, he grades fairly on both essays and other assignments. would take one of his classes again.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
ENSH101
Grade: C+
Jul 10, 2024

I really liked Dr. Wong at the beginning of the semester but halfway through the term I missed a class and he seemed to take it personally. He made me - and anyone else who missed that particular class (he did not say was mandatory) do extra work.

Tough grader
Amazing lectures
2.0
5.0
ENSH101
Grade: B-
Nov 20, 2024

Good teacher but tough grader. Lots of essays and class participation matters.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Gives good feedback
1.0
5.0
ENSH101
Grade: B-
Dec 8, 2024

He's very bad at giving any positive feedback even when receiving good marks. He calls on people in class and is very passive aggressive when you don't know answers or ask questions both over email and in person. The way he gives feedback and answers students questions is extremely degrading and passive aggressive.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
ENSH102
Grade: A
Apr 4, 2025
Would take again

Prof. Wong is hands down the best teacher I've had at UVic. His lectures are amazing and he is so passionate about the subject. He answers emails near instantly and is willing and able to help if you just ask. 10/10 loved every class

Amazing lectures
Graded by few things
Accessible outside class
4.0
3.0
ENSH102
Grade: A+
Apr 19, 2025
Would take again

Good and very knowledgeable prof. Willing to help anyone who puts in the work themselves. Helpful in emails and office hours.

Accessible outside class
Online Savvy
1.0
4.0
ENSH102
Grade: C-
Apr 23, 2025

Samuel was nothing but rude to me when I reached out for clarification on an assignment. He gives absolutely no rubric with any of his assignments, so if you rely heavily on them, good luck. I can see how people like him, he was just nothing but passive to me.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Accessible outside class
1.0
4.0
ENSH101
Grade: B+
Apr 23, 2025

Ugh horrible teacher. Would cold call students and when they didn't know the answer he would make a mockery out of them. Constantly gave me the same grade with absolutely no feed back. It felt like he didn't want my class to succeed. The average in my class was 71% which is insane considering it's a first year english course.

5.0
2.0
ENSH312
Grade: A
May 13, 2025
Would take again

Ignore first-year reviews if you're in English—Wong was a great lecturer and gave amazing feedback. I do wish his classes had included more criticism and/or theory, but his lectures were still insightful. Wong covered so much material that I felt significantly more well-versed in horror, and the larger canon, by the end of term. Recommend!

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

48%

Textbook Required

75%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 21 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
A- (5)
B- (3)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(4)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 23 reported grades
A: 7
A-: 5
B-: 3
B+: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (9)
Accessible outside class (7)
Tough grader (7)
Lecture heavy (6)
Gives good feedback (5)
Graded by few things (5)
Amazing lectures (5)
Amazing lectures (4)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.66 avg change
Dec
Jul
Nov
Dec
Apr
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGL201

5.0

(1)

ENGR110

5.0

(1)

ENGRA01

5.0

(1)

ENGR110120

5.0

(1)

366B

5.0

(2)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENGL115

5.0

ENGL125

5.0

ENGLISH366

5.0

ENGL201

5.0

ENG145

5.0

Similar Professors