3.2

Sandra Kirkham

Linguistics - University of Victoria

3.2
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
38%
Would Retake
96
Reviews
3.2
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
3.1
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

38%

Would Retake

96

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

29

4

18

3

14

2

18

1

17

What Students Say

Sandra is pedantic and lacking in self-awareness

LING397 - 1.0 rating

Kirkham is clearly passionate about linguistics but I found her lectures often made concepts much harder to learn than necessary

LING100A - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

96%

Textbook Required

27%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 32 grades
Most common grades:
A (10)
B+ (7)
A+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(0)C(5)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(11)
Based on 37 reported grades
A: 10
B+: 7
A+: 5
Not sure yet: 5
Common Tags
Participation matters (16)
Skip class? You won't pass. (9)
Test heavy (9)
Tough grader (7)
Lecture heavy (7)
Clear grading criteria (6)
Lots of homework (6)
Get ready to read (6)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.84 avg change
Aug
Oct
Mar
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ANTH361

5.0

(1)

LING360

4.0

(1)

LING361

3.7

(11)

LING100A

3.5

(37)

200

3.3

(3)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENG099

5.0

LING1

5.0

ANTH361

4.0

ENGL101

4.0

200

3.7

Reviews (96)
4.0
3.0
LING360
Jun 26, 2003

Great Prof. Always helpful and wants her students to do well. Lots of information, but an interesting class

5.0
4.0
LING361
May 29, 2004

An educator extrodinaire!! Very organized and interested in the material. Tough material and fair exams. I wish all profs were this keen about education.

5.0
4.0
LING361
Jun 4, 2004

Very nice lady, and very intelligent - and she can actually teach! (not always true for profs at UVIc)

5.0
3.0
LING361
Jun 12, 2004

Amazing! She's probably the most organized professor I've ever had. She'll bend over backwards to ensure that you know the material before writing the exam.

3.0
5.0
ENG099
Dec 8, 2004

She would scare all the students in the class to make us feel that no matter how hard we try in the subject, our writing is never enough..

5.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 12, 2004

A great prof!! She's super organized, and puts in tons of effort to help the class do well on tests.

1.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 21, 2004

Don't take this class! The E homework was ridiculous and not a good representation of the course material. Don't buy the workbook. It's useless!

5.0
2.0
LING361
Apr 13, 2005

I didn't want to take the class, but I had too. And now, I am glad I did. Sandra is a great teacher - super prepared, likes interaction, encourages questions (even from the annoying people) and altogether awesome. Be sure to study the notes she provides for the tests.

5.0
4.0
ANTH361
Apr 23, 2005

Great teacher, very organized and clear. Will answer questions without making your feel stupid and is approachable and helpful. I didn't want to take this course but I had to, and now I'm glad I did. Final exam was a bit insane though.

1.0
1.0
LING100A
Grade: A
Nov 14, 2005

She asks really ****ing retarded questions and then lets the class sit in silence for a really long time before giving us the answer (which everyone knows but is too lazy to call out). She also says "okay" "yup" "mmhmm" or the like after every single ****ing sentence that comes out of her mouth. AHHHH!!!!

5.0
3.0
100A
Dec 9, 2005

One of the most organized and helpful teachers out there. Enthusiastic and truly wants everyone to do well.

2.0
4.0
LING100A
Dec 19, 2005

If you're not doing well in the class, she has NO compassion for you, no matter what your reason is!!!! She's a robot -zero consideration for her students...unless you have an A!

3.0
4.0
LING100A
Dec 19, 2005

She was indeed very organized with her powerpoint presentations and her e-homework and webct, but everything about her bothered me and I couldn't stand going to class. She asks dumb questions that everyone knew the answers to. This class was actually harder than my LING 203 or 396 classes.

2.0
4.0
LING200
Jan 2, 2006

Class materials are not 100% related to the tests. Talking to her is not helpful for the tests.

5.0
3.0
LING361
Feb 13, 2006

She does say okay a lot, and does ask stupid questions. We spent an entire day analyzing "The dog ate the cookies" But compared to other teachers, she provides excellent power points, webCT support and study aids. She doesnt put the PPs up in advance though, and then gets mad when everyone is copying down the notes in class.

4.0
3.0
LING100
Mar 27, 2006

The prof is very organized and very thorough. She says OK alot, which is a little irritating, and asks questions alot and will not move on or give the answer until someone finally gets it right. I often wished she would just tell us the answer so we could write it down and move on. The class is definitely slow-moving and dull, but still informative

4.0
2.0
LING100A
Oct 25, 2006

Lots of examples. Helpful when having trouble

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 5, 2006

Sandra was an awesome prof. As long as you go to classes and take down the notes (she doesn't post them), you'll do awesome. She's interesting and one of those profs who has passion for what she's teaching. Great prof, and as long as you do the work it's an easy course.

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 3, 2007

She knows what she is talking about and really has her act together. It was quite a good class and the tests were fair.

5.0
4.0
LING100A
Jun 2, 2008

She was great! She was super organized and made learning fun.

2.0
4.0
LING100A
Nov 21, 2008

Very organized, good if you are interested in the material and want to go on in linguistics. I really disliked her demeanor. Whenever a question was asked it was as if she wanted to prove that student wrong or make them look dumb for asking. I went to see her outside of class and she was rude and didn't seem to want to help me. Left a sour taste.

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 10, 2008

Kirkham is probably the best first year prof I had. Amazingly organized, crystal clear delivery, and knew the material very well. She isn't bubbly cheerful or anything, but is very professional and understanding. If you want Linguistics explained well look for her. Read and do the hmwk and the tests will be easy. We're priviledged to have her.

5.0
1.0
LING100A
Dec 16, 2008

Wow. One of the easiest A+'s I've ever gotten. Her teaching is super clear, and is in fact sometimes so clear and detailed that it is boring because she spends too long on stuff. The e-homework was super easy, as were the tests, and she gave 8% participation. I barely had to try to get my A+, yet I still feel like I learned stuff. Good prof.

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Apr 16, 2009

AMAZING PROF! Seriously, best prof I've ever had at UVIC. Her blackboard page is so organized and there are so many resources to help you study for the tests. Her lectures are fun, interactive, she plays games and does participation activities. She is such a nice lady and very helpful!

5.0
1.0
LING100A
Jun 14, 2009

I love this prof. I had so much fun in 100a I am sorry that I didn't take it sooner. The class activities often feel like fun puzzle games. She's very clear about what she expects, and gives more supplementary help material than any other teacher I've had. Study terms/definitions, and know the material well. Don't slack off.

5.0
3.0
LING100
Jan 23, 2010

Excellent teacher

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Mar 13, 2010

Incredibly clear and very friendly. A fun class. You must attend ever class though because you cover lots of ground in one hour. Very interesting. However, really does mess with your spelling

4.0
2.0
LING200
Apr 5, 2010

very boring class. Sandra is sometimes unbearably annoying: poses open ended ridiculous questions to the class and sits in silence as no one answers (this can get really bad) , has a number of catch phrases (sandra-isms), over uses Web CT, and unable to explain concepts in more than one way.

2.0
3.0
LING100A
Apr 9, 2010

Horribly annoying. Treats her students like they are in grade 2, and does not properly listen to or answer questions and poses questions that make no sense. Not the worst teacher, but avoid her and her "Right, M'kay"'s if you can. Try counting how many times she says: Right, M'Kay - you'll go mental.

1.0
4.0
LING361
Apr 25, 2010

I feel sorry for the anthro students who got her as their first linguistics prof. She will ask rhetorical or excessively simple questions and then REFUSE to move on until they are answered. Completing large project for this class was like taking a whole other class, but was only worth approx 15% overall. Useless. DO NOT TAKE HER CLASSES!

2.0
4.0
LING361
Apr 26, 2010

I have had her for two classes now and I have promised myself to try and never have her again. She is very unclear about requirements for exams, and marks things wrong when most profs would give half marks. Her explanations are unclear. While I normally keep a good average, her classes bring my gpa down. Class attendance was extremely low.

3.0
4.0
LING100A
May 26, 2010

I found her lectures a bit dull, but I ended up learning a lot in the class. I did have to review the material a lot on my own and attending class was mandatory! I found her annoying at times (often deferred questions) but her e-hw was helpful and her lecture q's online. Marking was decently fair.

5.0
4.0
LING100A
Aug 16, 2010

Very clear lectures in a class I found surprisingly hard because oft he amount of stuff to memorize.

3.0
4.0
LING100A
Aug 30, 2010

Throws info @u too fast and too much. Hard to get clear answers. She had hard time understanding students as well. Very motivated, energetic. TA's- useless. Watch out test markings! Could be many mistakes! To do well, attend every class and participate as much as yo can! It's possible, interesting and challenging class!

4.0
3.0
LING100A
Nov 30, 2010

I found her to be an extremely well organized and helpful prof. She always laid out concepts well, though sometimes answered questions with an irksome air of superiority. I absolutely loved her and her class though. Reccommend!

1.0
3.0
LING290
Dec 15, 2010

Doesnt prepare you at all for her incomprehensible tests. Often you have to sit there just trying to figure out what she meant to say in lectures and tests. Doesnt answer your questions, just repeats what she already said that confused you in the first place. I will never take a class with this prof again.

1.0
5.0
LING1
Nov 15, 2011

Sandra is not a very good teacher in general. I hate to be rude but I will NEVER take a class with her again, I had the misfortune of having two courses with her this semester and she honestly made me lose my love for linguistics! Mandatory attendance but she is so dry you wont want to be there. Group work...everyday! plus she leaves you unprepared

5.0
2.0
LING100A
Dec 12, 2011

A great TEACHER! Many profs at Uvic know their subject but dont have a clue how to teach- Sandra knows both! Anyone complaining on here that she makes you "do group work" or "attend class regularly" doesnt understand how effective teaching and learning works. I would recommend this class to anyone interested in Linguistics(much better than Nyvlek)

4.0
4.0
LING100A
Dec 13, 2011

She was great, always willing to explain more but gave very clear lectures. Yes, she moved fast through the slides, but her classes were engaging and she posted ample material help online - practice questions, sample quizzes, lecture questions, etc. Totally recommend her.

4.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 15, 2011

Great prof and very knowledgeable. She's passionate about linguistics and wants to pass on that passion to her students. People that are complaining on here just don't have the mental capacity to grasp a linguistic paradigm. I recommend if you're capable of such a task.

4.0
1.0
LING361
Jan 5, 2012

Excellent prof. Very organized, and explains concepts clearly (even to us non-Linguistics students). Definitely have to attend class to do well, but she makes them interesting. Textbooks are unfortunately pricey, but necessary. Have taken my only two Linguistics classes with her, and would happily come back for a third.

4.0
5.0
LING397
Jun 28, 2012

Very hard marker, MUST go to class, as her powerpoints only have a few words on them and she elaborates much more. Guidelines for assignments pretty unclear/ambiguous. I would take her class for a more technical Ling, but do not recommend for 397

1.0
5.0
LING100A
Dec 22, 2012

worst prof ever! Never post notes online. In-class PPTs are hard to copy cause she leaves all the lights on and change it really fast. Lots of definitions in the tests with no early notice. She spend 20 min on homework each class and ALWAYS assign hw after the bell.

1.0
5.0
LING100A
Dec 23, 2012

Worst prof ever! She was not helpful at all. Her PPTs were hard to see because the font size are small and she used colors like yellow on them and she never turned the lights off which made it even harder to see! And she never post the notes online. Spent half of the class on homeworks and never ended classes on time! Exams were hard!

4.0
3.0
LING361
Mar 22, 2013

I have had her in 100A and in 361 and I think that she is a great prof, looks at concepts from different points of view and really gets the class thinking about the material. Her tests are hard but she is always willing to help you

5.0
1.0
100A
Apr 19, 2013

She is the reason I'm a Ling Major! I loved her, she made all the concepts really clear and kept us engaged. Write down the slides! She doesn't post them. Tests were all really fair, treat quizzes like midterms.

3.0
4.0
LING345
Jun 28, 2013

This class had no prereqs, but it became sharply clear that if you wanted to get a good mark, you needed to have a background in Linguistics. The midterm was eight pages in 50 minutes, and required you to have comprehensive knowledge of ANYTHING she mentioned in class. Can't help but feel her expectations were way too high for a month-long course.

5.0
3.0
LING100A
Dec 4, 2013

I am surprised by some of the negative ratings here. She's a great prof and is always willing to answer questions. My only complaint would be that she goes through ppt slides a bit too fast. If you are not completely stupid, show up to class, and take notes you will get a good grade. The textbook is not necessary (although helpful for ling majors).

3.0
1.0
LING290
Mar 21, 2014

Would be a great bird course, except attendance is almost mandatory due to random 'participation' activities. If nobody bothers to answer her trivial questions she poses, prepare for 5 minutes of pointless 'group discussion'. Odd teaching methodology but material is very simple and actually pretty interesting. Needs some Halls...

5.0
3.0
ENGL101
Grade: C
May 12, 2014

Such a good teacher,she is very helpful and her class is very clear. The only weakness is ,the content is a little bit hard and the quiz is hard.

3.0
4.0
200
Nov 30, 2014

Although the class was not an easy one, she is a really great prof. My only complaint is that she doesn't really give straight answer to questions. That said I did learned a lot, I really like that the midterm was written twice: once on your own and once in a group. The grading is very fair, and she seems like she likes her job. I would recommend!

3.0
3.0
LING200
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2014

I really like Sandra, the class was REALLY fun compared to other linguistics classes I have taken. Her coursespaces is top notch, as are all of her technological contributions to the course. She is good for answering questions in class but when it comes to assignments she can become cryptic and guarded. I would recommend, but be ready to work!

4.0
2.0
LING200
Dec 15, 2014

This was super fun! I sincerely enjoyed this class! Would recommend to take 200 with Sandra.

3.0
4.0
LING290
Dec 13, 2015

Sandra was great. She has taught two of my classes (290 & 200) both were interesting and challenging in their own respects. The only issue I had was her reluctance to distribute her slides or certain documents for printing due to copy-write issues. I get that it is becoming a paperless world but sometimes its nice to have a hard copy of the slides.

2.0
4.0
LING361
Apr 7, 2016

Group project that was only worth 20 percent but took up the entire semester. Walked around questions asked and didn't have a straight forward answer for anything. Good linguistics prof but not effective for an anthropology linguistics course.

4.0
4.0
LING200
Apr 25, 2016

Sandra seems nice. She just has a tendency to treat her class like they're in grade 3. Even handing papers back was like a disruptive throwback to grade school. She would tell us to get into groups, then we had to line up alphabetically, THEN she would hand out our tests. I also felt that she marked tests/HW unfairly. DON'T even miss one class.

3.0
3.0
LING361
Grade: A
May 5, 2016

Massive workload, with things weighted very oddly and unfairly. lectures were interesting, but missing even a couple will bring down your grade due to the complete inability to get the information you missed. Not very clear answers to questions. The textbook was supposedly mandatory but never used it once. Good LING course for the ANTH requirement

2.0
4.0
LING100A
Grade: B+
Nov 25, 2016
Wouldn't take again

She often just regurgitates the textbook. When asked a question, she will paraphrase what she just said and it won't make an improvement to your understanding. She does NOT post her slides online/gets upset if you try to take a photo. Goes through the slides quickly, so you will miss notes. Notes are unorganized.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
LING100A
Grade: A
Jan 3, 2017
Would take again

If you pay attention to her lectures and do the assigned readings, the class is quite enjoyable and easy. The lectures are not posted but I found if i missed some of the content, the textbook filled in the gaps.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
4.0
ENGL101
Grade: B+
Jan 29, 2017
Would take again

She is very helpful, but really tough grader.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Participation matters
2.0
4.0
ENGL101
Oct 2, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Very organized but she is a very tough grader. Her office hours are not helpful at all.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
5.0
4.0
LING100A
Oct 21, 2017
Would take again

Prof Sandra is really passionate in linguistics. Her class is always full of laughs. To get a good grade, listen carefully in class and DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

Participation matters
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
5.0
3.0
LING100A
Grade: A
Jan 5, 2018
Would take again

I'm very surprised at all the negative comments on here. She makes you love linguistics and makes you want to take another ling class. She was really nice and her class was very engaging and interesting. I used the textbook quite a bit, I'd definetly recommend buying it. The only criticism would be that she goes through her slides pretty quickly.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
Would take again
4.0
2.0
LING290
Grade: A+
Dec 18, 2018
Would take again

I've had Sandra for 100A, but enjoyed her much more for this class. Grading was based off of coursespaces assignments and midterms, that were fair in questions and based off of what we learned in class. Missing class isn't an option as she doesn't put her lecture up, other than a few random slides. Overall though, a relatively easy class.

Respected
Participation matters
1.0
2.0
LING397
Grade: A
Oct 28, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Sandra is pedantic and lacking in self-awareness. Her lectures are miserable because she just regurgitates the textbook (and yet attendance is mandatory). She teaches as though she holds all the knowledge and she believes herself gracious when she shares it with her students.

Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
5.0
ENGL101
Grade: D
Oct 29, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Has very confusing quizzes (that she obviously makes herself) every week and only gives you 10 minutes and then snatches the paper from you as you are writing. Then complains to the class that some of the quizzes were incomplete and we should try harder. Let alone it takes you a good five minutes to figure out what she is asking for the quiz.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Beware of pop quizzes
3.0
4.0
LING200
Nov 25, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Her grading for the "quizzes" is very inconsistent and nitpicky. If you don't use the exact terms she is looking for expect to receive a 0/4 on a question, regardless of whether or not you explain your answer. Make sure you write down what she says in class, the slides just regurgitate the textbook

Lots of homework
Skip class? You won't pass.
Beware of pop quizzes
4.0
5.0
LING290
Dec 12, 2019
Would take again

I really enjoyed this class and she made me appreciate linguistics. she further helped me understand what I was being taught in my other linguistics class. You need to attend the classes as much of what she tests you on is spoken about or taught in her lectures.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
LING290
Grade: A-
Feb 9, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I've had sandra for many classes, and it's always a chore. She's passionate about linguistics, but unwilling to share information, despite that it's her only job. When asked a question, she often repeats the thing that confused you in the first place. she also makes you get into groups and discuss topics she hasnt taught yet, waste of class time

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
LING397
Grade: A-
Dec 15, 2020
Would take again

10/10 would take another course with Sandra. She is very kind and approachable. The content and her lectures are interesting.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Caring
5.0
3.0
LING100A
Grade: A+
Jun 9, 2022
Would take again

She is the SWEETEST. You can tell she is passionate about the subject. Make sure to do the study guide and read the textbook and you'll do great. Her PowerPoints/lectures could use a bit of work, they are a bit unclear. Exams are online though so they are pretty straightforward. I mostly used the study guide to learn the material.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
100A
Grade: A+
Jun 24, 2022
Would take again

I loved Sandra's class. Clear rubric and criteria, interesting and well-explained content, and a lovely, knowledgable prof who genuinely cares about her students. The amount of info feels overwhelming, but if you do what she asks and ask for help when you need it, you will excel. Such a great course and prof, with help at every turn.

Amazing lectures
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
1.0
4.0
LING100A
Grade: C
Nov 21, 2022

Teaching ability lacks in every aspect. When asked questions she'll not make an attempt to understand & leave the questions unanswered. Slides hold little info; she often repeats what's said in the textbook & she doesn't like questions. She tells us we don't need to learn something, not teach it to us & then include it on the quizzes. Ridiculous.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Test heavy
1.0
3.0
LING345
Grade: A-
Dec 7, 2022

this is a class about sign language, she has been teaching it for at least a decade, and she's never bothered to learn the bare minimum amount of sign language. There's no prereqs but goodluck if you haven't taken ling100a. her quizzes are filled with trick questions and graded as though we are experts in linguistics, but the class has no prereqs??

Tough grader
Group projects
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
LING100A
Dec 7, 2022

Dr. Kirkham is clearly passionate about linguistics but I found her lectures often made concepts much harder to learn than necessary. No feedback was provided on either midterm exam or any of the online assignments beyond a percentage, which made it difficult to know how to improve and was quite discouraging.

2.0
4.0
100A
Grade: A
Dec 27, 2022

At times the lectures made concepts from the textbook easier to grasp but Sandra showed total disrespect for those who needed clarification. She makes you feel stupid for asking questions and then refuses to actually answer them, even outside class time. In-class activities were often unnecessary and discriminatory towards ESL or disabled students.

1.0
3.0
LING200
Feb 7, 2023

Dr. Kirkham has an accessibility and one test fits all problem. I have to wonder how she can teach courses pertaining to ASL when she herself doesn't know the language/culture and has an... attitude towards ASL users and deaf individuals.

Test heavy
2.0
3.0
100A
Grade: B+
Mar 2, 2023

Clearly very passionate about what she teaches, but unable to provide clarification when asked questions during lectures.

1.0
3.0
LING100
Grade: B+
Mar 22, 2023

Lecture content is terribly organized and information is spread out everywhere. Basically a teach yourself class as lectures are quiet pointless but she checks attendance. Her test outlines are so broad they are no help what so ever. If you ask questions in class she basically just repeats the question and leaves you still confused.

4.0
4.0
100A
Grade: C+
Sep 28, 2023
Would take again

Sandra is a level-headed professor who is on top of the large amount of content learned in 100A and B. She responds to emails in a timely fashion, and always answered questions in an informed and helpful manner. Information is covered quickly in class, but she times it well with assigned textbook readings. Group study is encouraged!

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
LING200
Grade: A
Sep 29, 2023

I understand why UVic's LING department is seeing the lowest numbers ever these past few years, and why UVic sent out a survey asking students if 200 level courses should be dropped from the major, as Sandra's class's a prereq for most 300-400 level LING classes. She didn't schedule tests and qizzes with CAL, and wouldn't offer any alternatives.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Beware of pop quizzes
2.0
4.0
200
Grade: B+
Nov 28, 2023

Does not explain concepts in class. Gives you homework on stuff we haven't learnt yet and feedback provides no clarification. A teach yourself class with a lot of information that is not clearly understood. You do not know what you are doing wrong and your written answers have to be almost word for word from what she wants or else its wrong.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lots of homework
1.0
4.0
100A
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 4, 2023

If you're considering doing the Ling program here, all I have to say is run. Her lecturing style (quiet, never sticks to her assigned topic of the day) and her lecture slides are lacking greatly in effort and skill. Class isn't even worth attending, but she checks attendance. READ THE TEXTBOOK because you're basically on your own out here.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
200
Grade: A
Feb 6, 2024
Would take again

She made me fall in love with phonology. Very logical, methodical, and fare - impeccably organized, she looks for specific things, and grades accordingly. Read her slides, (this is what's on her tests) if there's any concept on the slides you don't understand - work with the material until you do. In tests, copy her slides verbatim!!

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Accessible outside class
4.0
4.0
LING200
Grade: B+
Feb 6, 2024
Would take again

Sandra's tough but she knows what she's talking about. Expects a LOT from you her students and assigns a lot of work but you'll finish the class knowing a whole lot more than you did before. If you need this course, plan for it to be a heavier one. Her lectures can get messy but she keeps it interactive and interesting.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Lots of homework
5.0
3.0
LING100A
Grade: A+
May 3, 2024
Would take again

o.m.g. i love sandra's structure and attention to detail of the class. don't be fooled: it is hard and grueling for a first year course, comparable to a bio or chem class, but as long as you read the textbook and practice consistently you'll be fine! Also definitely get a group of study buddies to review notes and concepts in case you miss class

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lots of homework
2.0
4.0
LING100A
Grade: C+
May 27, 2024

Sandra has a very interesting but dull way of teaching. She reads off her slides in lectures and isnt very engaging. Her lectures are pretty boring and require a lot of note taking. She compares Linguistics to Math a lot which gets annoying after a while. I would personally not take one of her classes again in the future.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
So many papers
2.0
3.0
LING100A
Grade: B+
Aug 30, 2024

She did not come off as particularly knowledgeable during lectures and the online system was hard to navigate.

2.0
4.0
LING100A
Grade: C+
Oct 29, 2024

Sandra is a nice person but not a very good prof imo. She over explains things, when the textbook will give you a straight answer. Her class is very test heavy, so make sure you know your terminology. If you are with CAL and need extra time make sure you talk with them because she gives everyone 1.5 time which worked out to 2mins per question.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
LING345
Grade: A
Mar 18, 2025

I have had minimal positive interactions with her here, she is unwilling to help students and her class is not a positive space. Questions are rarely answered other than "did you read the bright space" or "think about it a little more". She is uneducated in ASL and provides incorrect information, her teaching this class was a mistake.

Participation matters
Group projects
Test heavy
4.0
4.0
100A
Grade: A+
Apr 21, 2025
Would take again

Dr Kirkham knows the material well and her lectures are very interesting. The assignments and midterms can be squished together in certain weeks, but it's manageable. Put the work in and you'll do fine--don't skip class and do the readings.

Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
100A
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 14, 2025

Too much material in the lectures. Doesn't seem to understand that this is introductory, since most students are not well-versed in linguistics. Heavy reference to math; teaches like a math course. Name-dops Noam Chomsky like he's department Chair. Overall, 100A is too distracting. Wouldn't recommend except to the most diehard linguistics majors.

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
100A
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 4, 2025

Sandra is an interesting person. She seems sweet but is super stand-offish and unhelpful. Classes were confusing, and I had to teach myself most of the content. Also, way too demanding for a 100-course. I feel bad for anyone who has to take it after me... good luck guys...

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
100A
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 8, 2025

Took this class as a "fun" elective, now it might be the reason I can't apply for co-op in my field next semester. Her lectures made the content even more confusing than it should've been. Often there were typos or contradictions in her online quizzes, making the work even more confusing. For an introductory course this was too intense.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
100A
Grade: A-
Dec 15, 2025

Sandra is clearly very knowledgeable in her field; however, I do not think she should be teaching any sort of level 100 course. The class was super content-heavy, and somehow her explanations made concepts more complicated than they needed to be. She is also not helpful whatsoever if you ask her questions. Read the textbook - you're on your own.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
3.0
3.0
LING290
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2025
Would take again

Sandra pushes us to reach our own conclusions and think critically rather than just giving us answers, but it can sometimes be difficult in a no-prereq course! Gave us opportunities in class to discuss amongst peers. A few online assignments seemed irrelevant to tests and course material and info for those couldn't be found in textbook nor lecture.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Caring
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

96%

Textbook Required

27%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 32 grades
Most common grades:
A (10)
B+ (7)
A+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(0)C(5)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(11)
Based on 37 reported grades
A: 10
B+: 7
A+: 5
Not sure yet: 5
Common Tags
Participation matters (16)
Skip class? You won't pass. (9)
Test heavy (9)
Tough grader (7)
Lecture heavy (7)
Clear grading criteria (6)
Lots of homework (6)
Get ready to read (6)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.84 avg change
Aug
Oct
Mar
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ANTH361

5.0

(1)

LING360

4.0

(1)

LING361

3.7

(11)

LING100A

3.5

(37)

200

3.3

(3)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENG099

5.0

LING1

5.0

ANTH361

4.0

ENGL101

4.0

200

3.7

Similar Professors