3.2
Quality4.1
Difficulty67%
Would Retake174
Reviews67%
Would Retake
174
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
174 total ratings5
33
4
56
3
31
2
26
1
28
What Students Say
“I'd take him over Bandik any day”
OCHEM2 - 3.0 rating“People avoid his class like the plague, but it's really not that bad”
CHEM0310 - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
34%
Textbook Required
35%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.21 avg changeRatings by Course
CHEM0300
5.0
(1)OCHEM0320
5.0
(1)0320
5.0
(1)0330
5.0
(1)OCHEM310
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
ORGANIC
5.0
ORGANICI
5.0
0740
5.0
CHEM0730
4.7
CHEM0330
4.5
Reviews (172)
For your grades sake, DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFESSOR!
organic can be stressful enough w/out him
He's hardcore about O-Chem and expects you to be to. It was rough.
horrible prof. tells students they are stupid, & dont deserve to be in his class
impossible exams, and he could care less
best teacher i ever had. funny too
the only reason there is one good comment about this professor is because the person who wrote it is a nerd!
Very hard! His lectures were confusing, exams were pretty hard. Plus he makes you feel like the dumbest person on earth.
Only reason this guy is still teaching is because he brings a fortune to the Chem dept in grants. He is brilliant, but when you aren't, the last thing you need is discouragement from him. Let's just say record numbers of people have failed his class.
you won't find a prof anywhere that knows more about o-chem than Nelson. He's a decent teacher, but much too involved in his research and doesn't care to help you outside of class
Very smart guy but extremely unorganized. Couldn't care less about his students the way it seems. Lectures are clear and all, but his tests are unreasonably hard...why must professors suck like that?
This guy is super smart. His tests are require you to really understand material. I have gone to his office hours, and he is helpful.
very difficult professor; incredibly messy handwriting; if you can get someone else, get it! He's intelligent, but that doesn't make up for a bad grade!
That was the worst final ever...I guess I should've spent way more than two entire days studying for it...so not cool of him to do that to us.
he's a piece of work, knows all the students hate ochem and for that he makes the class extra hard...great teacher of the material, just very challenging
Very hard exams, but a good lecturer. DOn't take him if you want to pass.
This guy is such a jerk. He's so smart, but he really sucks as a teacher. Everything I learned in the class was from the book. If he wasn't such a good researcher, there's no way he would be teaching. By the way I got an A- and I still hate him.
No Comments
His tests were very difficult. He expects you to know every single thing he teaches. If you study you get the best education and basis in organic chem in the entire department. If you really want to know the materialhe will help you as much as he can.
very clear and informative lectures. always sticks to the pertinent material. very straightforward. exams are usually written pretty well, but are challenging
nelson is awesome! very challenging...don't even bother signing up if you think you're gonna coast though his class. definitely hard, but recommended
Wasn't very helpful in office hours
he's brilliant (and he knows it), but on the arrogant side. he's a pretty good teacher but you can tell he doesn't like teaching. exams are hard but you can succeed if you study well and not miss lecture.
His class is very hard, you have to go to it and study like crazy. He's a genius and he knows it so he's pompous. But he'll make deals with you if you're having a hard time in the class. The tests are insanely hard, study the lecture notes rather than the book--this is very important to pass.
THE TRUTH: good lecturer and a fair but very hard core grader. exams pose questions of substantial detail that require a very firm grasp of the concepts of ochem. Give his course the time and effort it needs and you'll walk away with a great understanding of ochem and a leg up for MCATs,DATs, etc
No Comments
He may be the most hardcore prof I've had at Pitt, and that could be why many people don't like him. Study the concepts presented in the handouts! Everything on the exams are in there. Use the book to clarify if needed, but let the handouts be your guide. Nelson is tough, but he really does know what he's doing and he is fair.
One of the most interesting chem professors i have ever had. His class is hard but if you give it the time it deserves, you will do well. Study the notes (not the text book) and be prepared for hard and very conceptual tests. Application of his notes is more important than having the ability to recite them. Dedication to his class equals a good gra
great prof if you want a challenge...he is not as bad as everyone says he is.
His teaching style is pretty good, I'd say, also b/c he gives you PDF handouts to follow with. Those are great. He doesn't explain some fundamentals clearly though. He is never accessible outside of class and throws monster tests. If you're good at problem-solving, then you'll have a field day with the tests. If not, be prepared to study ur ass off
Just a jerk overall. As many have said before me, he knows ochem, so he thinks anyone who doesn't know it is an idiot. Rather than be helpful, he criticizes anyone who asks a question because the answer is so obvious to him. Should not be a teacher because he does not care about his students. Ochem is manageable, but avoid this pathetic man.
easy to understand, but his tests are harder than some of the other profs for ochem. the curve ends up evening things out though
Lecture notes online are clutch. Teaches the fundamentals and relates everything to them. Tests are harder than other professors, but he scales so you usually only need something like an 80% for A, 65% for B and 45% for C. Overall, I liked Scotty G, taught things well and graded fairly.
Ochem is a tough subject, and nelson is a tough teacher, BUT he is very intelligent and will teach you. other teachers either make u learn yourself or just pass you through without you learning anything. Take this guy and the much harder class(ochem 2) will be easy for you while everyone else is struggling cause their ochem teachers where terribl
Ochem is a tough subject, and nelson is a tough teacher, BUT he is very intelligent and will teach you. other teachers either make u learn yourself or just pass you through without you learning anything. Take this guy and the much harder class(ochem 2) will be easy for you while everyone else is struggling cause their ochem teachers where terribl
Nelson was a very great Ochem professor. Compared to the other professors for ochem 1, he seemed to cover topics in the most depth, giving those in his class a more thorough understanding of the material. This class is hard, but not impossible. The book is not needed, as his tests are all from the material covered in lecture. TAKE SCOTT!!!!!
***EXTREMELY HARD CLASS*** his notes are great, but the exams are harder than any i've had before. and i'm not sure how anyone gets in the room cause his ego is huge, like others have said, he KNOWS HIS STUFF . favorite line of Scotty G's "this would probably by an Sn2 reaction ... AND I'd be right" Gotta love it.
He was a good professor and was very clear on what he was teaching you. He seems like the type that is unapproachable but if you go to see him he can be very helpful. His tests were definetly difficult but if you are well prepared you will be fine.
Worst professor I've had. Taught organic chemistry by turning off the lights and using his laser pointer to point out powerpoint slides. Learned absolutely nothing from him. Retook with Fortney and did sooo much better
very hard class, but very ochem class is. however at the end ochem becomes understandable because of the way nelson teaches. tests are very hard but becomes satisfying to do well ... very helpful in office hours, nice curve as well
Hard class, but all Organic Chemistry is. Lecture is absolutely essential so never miss it, but you'll learn more there then you ever would in the book. Use book to supplement what he goes over in class and you'll be more than fine for the exams. Big curve, but it's not that hard to get in the 80's for each exam minimum. Nice guy!
Scott's notes are impeccable and if you go to class, you will understand the material better than just reading the book (read: GO TO CLASS)...that doesn't mean you'll do well on exams --they are very, very hard (but there's a decent curve). He pops a few jokes now n then that keep you awake! Not a bad class at all. Fav quote? "satisfy yourself..."
Nelson was not as bad as everyone says. As long as you actually go to class, pay attention and study, you will do fine. The way he teaches helps you understand WHY things happen, not just memorizing it
Nelson was not as bad as everyone says. As long as you actually go to class, pay attention and study, you will do fine. The way he teaches helps you understand WHY things happen, not just memorizing it.
Class was really difficult to understand, and tests were simply ridiculous compared to other profs in the dept. far too full of himself to be an effective professor. i went into the first test (after attending all class, doing all hw, office hrs) expecting at least an 80...got a 60. Saw tests where students literally got 10% on the 3rd exam. avoid.
Ridiculously hard exams, but I walked away actually understanding some things and proud of what I learned. Loves chemistry, and it shows in his lectures. Types lecture notes, and posts practice quiz sheets which are basically the exam. Class is mandatory. Subject is boring, but he isn't. Never got above a 78 on an exam and got a B.
Scott is a great professor who cares about chemistry and his students. He has good notes and makes lecture very clear. He is approachable after class and in office hours. I never had a problem asking him questions. He also has fair exams that cover the material from lecture. Overall, a great Ochem professor who I would definitely recommend.
Dr. Nelson sees his students more as an irritation than anything else. He also moves faster and covers more material than the other ochem 2 professors do. That said, the he is very clear in his lectures and gives fair tests. If you can stand his misanthropic personality and the pace of his class, he's a good professor to have.
Professor Nelson is a geat teacher. He posts lecture notes, so his elctures are very clear. Go to class and pay attention and you'll do fine. He is a funny guy and enjoys chemistry. I like ochem because of his clarity.
Scott is a great professor. You will learn a ton in his class, and I would highly recommend him if you plan on taking the MCAT. He seemed intimidating at the beginning of the semester, but he turned out to be a funny guy. He gives fair tests (literally straight from lecture notes), and the class ended up having a decent curve at the end of the term
pretty good at explaining things clearly. however, the tests were completely ridiculous. the average for the class (for me) was a 51, and the average for the final was in the low 40s. that should say it all. most people got C's, some got B's or D's, few got A's or F's.
Very demanding which isnt a huge deal. The problem is he goes so fast and doesn't explain well in class that this class becomes unpredictable and makes the test hard to study for and your left with no choice but to memorize. He can explain decently outside of class if you ask, but you cant learn all of ochem like that. They're better options around
Dr. Nelson is such a life saver if you have to take the MCAT! He really goes through practice MCAT problems and is now making my studying for the MCAT go much smoother.
Professor Nelson is hard to work with and speaks in a droning monologue the entire class. I often struggled to keep awake through his "Why doesn't it work this way? That's a great question. Let me see if I can figure out the answer." When he was the one who asked the question. Do not take his class unless you already know chemistry well!
Dr. Nelson is NOT a nice guy; he's very irritable. That being said, he's a decent prof. Goes through material the slowest out of any OChem prof. Will always take the time needed to answer any question that's not "do we need to know this for the test?" (Hint, the answer is yes.) He also tries not to test on anything that he doesn't cover in class.
Gives you notes online that are not readable. Talks too quickly in class to write anything down. Assigns so much homework, not for credit, that it is literally impossible to do it all. The tests are all conceptual and you have no idea of knowing what to expect unless you somehow understand the entirety of the fairly unclear textbook.
Many great teachers are also hard. Nelson is not one of them; he's just brutal. Medicore teacher, no correlation between concepts he explains and what's on the test. And good god those tests, even 2 years later its still shocking how insane some of those questions were, especially the final with biochem. Many hardworking smart kids got C's with him
The dude is basically a walking textbook. He knows everything and seems to just spit out reactions and information as he pleases. His tests are completely unpredictable and leave you basically trying to learn all the in's and out's of the textbook, his notes, and even notes from other classes (which seem to help the most).
Definitely the worst class I've taken so far at Pitt. Nelson is a nice guy and is willing to answer questions, but his exams are, no matter how hard you study, brutal. Exam averages are rarely higher than a 50%. His lecture notes aren't very helpful, pretty much just study the book as much as you can. Overall: worst class ever.
Nelson expects all his students to know every chemistry principle inside and out. His lectures are prepared and organized but are far too oversimplified to prepare you for exams. He's very stingy on partial credit and will take off the majority of points on a question where you missed a trivial detail. Credit only comes from exams, no homework.
If you go to class and pay attention, you'll feel like you're understanding the material, which is nice.But the tests are extremely hard. Need to straight memorize a lot. The final was brutal with a large biochem focus. Test averages were 68, 46, 55. There are probably worse and better options
I have no idea why the chemistry department is letting him teach. His policy is no questions during lecture and during recitations he makes you afraid to ask. He harps on about minute details in class and then asks questions on exams that mention a topic briefly touched upon. He is useful for the MCAT, however if you're not pre-med, don't take him.
His tests are difficult but definitely fair. He does cover everything in class that is on the test. Just like any ochem class a lot of studying is required and the main thing that affects your grade. I think he is a very clear lecturer. He has a really funny, dry sense of humor.
Orgo 2 with Nelson made me feel like Harry Potter in detention with Umbridge. You MUST memorize all of the structures of the amino acids, base pairs, sugar molecules, etc. Blood will be shed, averages will be low, but so long as you do above the average you can do well. He gives no practice tests and answers questions smarmily. A = 78% in my class.
His tests are very hard-usually an average in the 50s. He does not come to recitations prepared. His personality comes off as scummy and condescending. He is very hard to talk to and seems like he would rather be anywhere else that in the lecture room. Skip ochem2 a semester to avoid having Nelson if you can-Huston is much better
Nelson is BOMB! I'd take him over Bandik any day. Yes its hard but his test are fair. I'm not a 4.0 student. He is so clear in class. Super sarcastic but funny. I am so happy I did not listen to all the crap written here about him. Sounds like a bunch of cry babies to me. Hi welcome to college and studying a lot! And I don't mean memorizing.
Never posted on this site before, and actually never thought I would, but came to say that Nelson is a great professor. Dont be swayed away from taking from judging from the other reviews here. Study from CLASS NOTES and take GOOD NOTES in lecture... Write down what he says. Tests are fair if you study... Plus he's got some jokes.
very low test averages but gives a generous curve at the end of the semester. study notes and go to lecture and you will be fine
I think he's absolutely hilarious and a pretty cool guy. That being said, I would skip taking the class a semester to avoid him. If you've get a phD in organic chemistry you'll be good, if not you're out of luck. Terrible teaching style, presents everything in the most confusing way and tests have barely any partial credit and are way to hard.
Take him for ochem 2. Although his exams are tough, he will prepare you for the MCAT so well. Great lecturer and although I've never been to office hours I heard he really tries to help students. All you need to know in order to ace the exams can be found in his printed notes. 74 is an A-, so just study and you're golden.
Scott Nelson was a very difficult professor. I went to his office hours, and he was not very helpful.
He builds so much off basic fundamentals, make sure you have an excellent understanding of OCHEM1 before taking his class. Tests are very difficult. Averages in the 50s. Use the book for practice problems, not for reading (for me that was a waste of time). His in class notes are what he makes his tests from.
Nelson is my main man. However, as awesome as I think he is, not many others agree. I really worked in Ochem1 and understand it fully, which is mandatory in order to succeed in Nelson's class. His tests are difficult but straight forward if you know the stuff backwards and forwards. Start studying 2 weeks before the test. DO PRACTICE PROBLEMS.
I know a number of people who thought his tests were unnecessarily brutal, they definitely were extremely difficult, but a massive curve at the end of the course takes care of the low exam averages. He was a good lecturer, funny, you learn a lot in the course that's especially good for pre-med. He's not an easy professor, but I enjoyed having him.
He's a great lecturer. You are going to clear everything at least two or three times. Not real big on people talking during class or asking questions. Punted off to recitations. You absolutely must do practice problems and practice every day. Like seriously. Yes. Legit. Or you will be annihilated. Averages in the 40s-50s.
He's a really clear lecturer. Everything you need to know for the exams are on the notes he gives out. It's Ochem 2. You'll have to work for a good grade so don't expect to get it without putting in efforts. I manage to get an A from just doing the weekly problem sets and not actually those from the book.
All ochem professors are going to have hard classes, and Nelson is no exception. Study his notes until your eyes bleed because anything on there is fair game. Practice, practice, practice, and get your hands on as many old exams as you can, as he sometimes recycles questions. Very difficult class/professor, but doable if you're committed
His lectures and notes are very clear. Very good at explaining things. Tests are tough but in the end it is all curved so just do better than other people and you will be fine. He wants you to learn to think using the concepts instead of just memorizing. Weekly problem sets are really helpful when studying for tests.
Scotty Pops gets a bad rap. Sure, his tests are hard which is reflected in his low test averages, but they definitely aren't impossible. He presents his lecture notes very clearly and is very willing to help you out during office hours. People avoid his class like the plague, but it's really not that bad. Ochem is a hard class, who knew???
Had for organic chem. Not too bad as a teacher, not too great. Gave 1 rating because he had put material on the final exam that wasn't included on the syllabus... whoops
I took him for Organic Chemistry, which is the reason I found him to be difficult. While the class was incredibly hard, every other teacher is worse. While there isn't extra credit, the tests are curved a lot; For my class you passed with a 30%. However, he isn't afraid to give no partial credit on the tests if you got the answer completely wrong.
Nelson genuinely cares about our success. He is a very traditional professor, but it's not challenging to show someone the respect they deserve. Do the homework, go to office hours, put the effort in. You will learn.
Orgo is hard so expect nothing less from his class, but his explanations are clear and organized. All the material he goes over is posted the before the lect starts, its advised to skim over it at least so you're not going in blind. Exams are rough but are fair. Practice, Study, and see him in Office Hours and you'll do just fine.
Dr. Nelson is one of the best Orgs professors that Pitt has to offer. He explains things thoroughly and is truly invested in helping the students understand the concepts and be able to apply them in real life. He's a real gem. 10/10 recommend.
I retook Orgo so I could get a better grade, and Im so glad that I chose Nelson. He explains clearly, provides lots of in text practice, and bases the exams off of lecture and book problems. Hes super nice, super accessible, and a real gem. 11/10 recommend.
If you even want any hope of getting into graduating on time, or getting into grad school, avoid this professor. Extremely hard.
Scott was a good choice for OChem 1. His tests focus more on synthesis than mechanisms. He is condescending in recitation whether you ask questions or not, but they're optional so you don't have to ruin your day by going. He's much more helpful in office hours. The tests were very fair, especially compared to the other professors. 60 average
Scott Nelson meant well, he was a very nice guy who liked to crack some jokes. Definitely someone you'd enjoy a cold one with, but when in comes to Ochem he is not your guy. He prewrites the notes and then reads them in class, something I could do at home. His tests are very hard. He said he would curve them and never did. RUDE. 60 average
If you like hard exams, staying up late, memorizing over 40 reactions, and decreasing your GPA by .3 then Scott Nelson is your man. Hard tests, nice man, but who cares about personality. He ignored my email about a test, which is rude. Just don't take Nelson, he will be your worst nightmare.
I am writing this comment to address the person below. There is a C in Scott (The second letter)? and a 62% as a C would help you so why are you complaining?? His class is manageable.
Scotts exams are obviously hard, but with his curve and willingness to help students, he is the BEST choice for Ochem1. With any other ochem professor, earning a B will give you a B - with Scott, you can expect to be curved to an A-. The curve ensures that the difficulty of the exams challenges you without ruining your grade. More than fair.
Yes OChem is hard, but his exams are unreasonably hard; my roommate was in the honors section and her exams were so much easier. He is really good at lecturing, and I learned a lot. I feel that my grade doesn't reflect how much I've learned because the exams were impossible. He introduced sapling hw as a whole test grade, what a life-saver.
Dr. Nelson's class is hard, but he lectures well, and explains reactions and topics. You're going to have to put in work outside of class to do well, but thats what it takes to learn Ochem. Dr. Nelson is very friendly and helpful in office hours.
Dr. Nelson's lecture notes are clear and helpful. Also provide most of the test material. I really enjoyed going to lecture and learned a lot from office hours. He really cares about students and wants everyone to do well. However, it is o chem, so expect to work hard. For sure would take again, one of the best professors I've had.
Nelson is a very dry lecturer, but luckily if you dislike his teaching you can download the notes online. When I attend his lectures (80% of the time) I have an extremely hard time listening to him due to the fact that he is so monotone. I know chemistry can be dry, but Ward (Chem 120) was much more enthusiastic.
Teaching orgo to students for the first time is a tough task to do, and Nelson knows that. He lectures for all 50 minutes and doesn't accept questions just because he knows how much material he needs to fit in. His notes are all online and he only tests on his notes,which will prepare you well for orgo 2. Tests are very fair if you put in the work.
Nelson was definitely one of the tougher professors I have had at Pitt. His test averages were usually low (50s & 60s)and he could be condescending about the material/grades. His lectures were mostly him slightly elaborating on his already printed notes. Final was mostly on new material instead of completely cumulative. He did curve the class.
He is one of the better chem professors at Pitt. He gives all the notes for you to print out and follow which is very helpful. There is online hw. The tests are hard, but reasonable. It is ochem, so expect to struggle, but he is the best choice. There is a significant curve at the end.
Great professor, who lectures well but the notes are online and premade by him but don't help that much with overall understanding of the material. His tests are a few open-ended questions that are ridiculously hard and make up most of your grade in the class.
Pretty good professor! Lectures are a little boring due to the fact that he elaborates off of pre-made note packets, but the material he presents is relatively clear. Online HW constitutes 22% of your final grade, so take advantage of that. Exams are difficult and consist of 5 open-ended questions, so practice a ton; quite a nice curve at the end
Dr. Nelson is easily one of the best professors Ive had at Pitt. His lectures are very thorough and well explained. His tests are on the easy side (relative to the book problems he recommends), and he has a very generous grading scale for the class. Also, homework is worth an entire test grade, so thats a plus.
I think Scott is one of the better options for OChem, but I do not enjoy chemistry at all. The lectures were very dry at times and recitation is a waste of time. His tests are usually fair and there is a lot of partial credit.
Very clear in lectures and provides a rough outline of notes for each. 2 exams and sapling (worth another exam score) are the only grades, but a big curve at the end helps. Recitation is optional and only run by students' own questions. Exams rely heavily on structures and very minimal sentences, and questions are very straight-forward.
Hands down the funniest professor I've stumbled across at Pitt. Dr. Nelson has a great personality and clearly knows what he's talking about. All of his lectures make a lot of sense, homework counts for a test grade, and his curve is pretty reasonable. Love this guy
Incredible professor. His sense of humor made a 10am class incredible. I was really worried about ochem but he made it very straightforward with his lectures (that he uploads before hand) Sapling homework is a test grade and he has a big curve at the end.
Okay. Scott Nelson is a shining star in the chemistry department. Funny, crazy smart, helpful, great at explaining things. Scott seems intimidating but loves questions at office hours. Gives u rlly organized printed notes, 3 exams, sapling counts as exam. Difficulty is as expected for ochem. Straightforward. take him. do it. go to acs tutors
I Liked him a lot. Exams questions are very straight forward, he is not trying to trick you with the questions. Read the textbook, understand the mechanisms, seek help at tutoring, do the practice problems and you'll be fine. Heavily Curves the class. Average is usually around 50-60 but he curves so that an A is a 75-85ish.
I would not recommend taking this course with Dr. Nelson. Exam averages were in the 50s-60s, and the average uncurved final grade was failing. Exams were tricky, and lecture notes were too simple compared to what we we were tested on. Curve becomes smaller after the final (was expecting a B with the curve, then ended up with a C- after the final).
Dr. Nelson was a great professor! You have to work very hard for your grade because the lecture notes he gives out for practice are way easier than the problems on the exams. I would take him again!
Not fond of Nelson, idk, found him annoying, but helpful that notes are online, even if a bit confusing. If you know material to level of sapling and optional hw problems, you'll do well with the curve, but that takes work. Exams are mostly reasonable, but sometimes things that were talked abt but not on notes and structures of specific reagents.
He will introduce concepts but you have to solidify that information by taking your own notes from the book. Homework doesn't help you with the tests that much but reading/taking book notes/book problems will net you an A in this class if you take the time to understand the material. Barely went to recitation and not a single office hour attended
I thought his exams were tough but fair. His lectures were simpler than what is on the exam, but if you read the book and attend lecture then you should be fine. Doing the problems he assigns in the book is a must if you want to do well because they're like what he has on the exam. Test averages are in the 50-60 range, but he curves fairly .
Dr. Nelson is a really great option for O chem, if you attend lectures every week, do all of the practice problems in the textbook that he recommends and ask questions on anything you don't understand, you can get an A. Office hours aren't that helpful, only if you are really really behind.
Ochem's hard and can be very confusing, but Nelson makes it as simple as possible. his tests are fair, but you definitely have to put in a lot of effort outside of class to do well. ochem's hard work, and doing well in ochem requires a decent amount of effort. nelson makes that whole process a lot less painful. i definitely recommend him.
Sapling counted as one midterm, we had two midterms and a final. His lectures were very helpful and not too difficult to understand. The exams are more similar to textbook problems than the sapling. Recitations were ran like an office hour and not worth attending.
A Sapling homework grade is worth a midterm grade, and has one less midterm as a result (2 midterms and a final instead of 3 midterms and a final). Posts all lectures as a PDF before class and he rigidly stays to what is written on the PDFs during lecture. Questions are reserved mostly for recitation. Passable without going to class by reading PDFs
The lectures are very slow and monotonous and struggled to really learn much from the lectures. I read the textbook and mostly followed his suggested problems in the book which helps prepare for the quizzes. However, I have never met a more passive aggressive professor who actively insults his students and turns them down when help is needed.
Terrible. Not accommodating in the SLIGHTEST to the online situation. Makes us take quizzes AND convert them into PDFs AND upload them online within 25 minutes or receive a penalty. His lectures are worthless he just repeats the easy concepts over and over and then flies right by the difficult concepts. He might be good in person, but not online.
I am going to say that he is probably one of the best professors I have ever met at pitt. Yes, Organic Chemistry is hard and confusing, but Nelson is really a patient person to answer all the questions you have if you go to his office hours.
The absolute worst during online classes. Extremely rude to students, and unrealistic quiz/exam expectations.
Constantly disrespectful and demeaning. Exams were decently difficult but filled with trick questions, I felt extremely unprepared in comparison to my peers in orgo 2. Avoid this class.
Arguably the worst I've seen or heard of, ESPECIALLY in online setting. V closed-minded to online learning and makes the worst of it. Blindly penalizes for any uploading errors- 10% per MINUTE late. Unaccommodating to any issues. Rude, condescending, and unavailable to struggling students. Makes you feel so small in office hours. Beware!
We had 6 quizzes during our course, which made up 50% of our grade. These quizzes had no flexibility with timing (late penalty), but seemed to get better as the course went on. The sapling wasn't too bad and lectures were very clear and helpful. The notes had all the necessary information and Dr. Nelson was very understanding outside of class in OH
Dr. Nelson was severely strict about submitting online quizzes during COVID. One minute late and it's a 10% penalty. His quizzes did not reflect what was taught in lecture and you essentially had to teach yourself with a disorganized textbook. He was also very rude and condescending about the quizzes, audio issues during live lectures, etc.
Professor Nelson was extremely rude to his students in an online setting and was extremely not adjusting. I have never met a professor who was so not adjusting to his students in such a difficult time. Online students for the online exam were at so much of a disadvantage compared to in person students that it seemed like the exam wanted you to fail
Nelson isn't the worst. His slides/materials are relatively easy to follow if you go to class and pay attention. Ochem is hard: you have to put in work (easily 3 hours per hour of lecture) to do well and understand what's happening. He tends to gloss over the hard stuff & you take a quiz every two weeks (online class). Big letter curve at the end.
I took the honors ochem. Nelson's lectures are good, but there is a big difference between what he discusses in lecture/ in the textbook and the difficulty of the tests. He makes you feel very small in recitation and he DOES NOT respond to any emails. No consideration for difficulty of online. No practice exams. Ochem is hard but he makes it worse.
Easily the worst class I've ever had. Stay away from this person, at least for online classes.
Nelson was overall a good professor considering how difficult ochem is. He explains the material well as long as you pay attention and go over the text before class. He has 6 quizzes which were definitely more difficult than what he explains in class and the practice problems. Sapling is 20% of your grade.
Class wasn't worth the extreme stress & time spent. Lectures are dry. Quiz/HW problems are WAY harder than in class examples. Condescending towards students asking questions about material. Put up huge late penalty scores 4 days before final w/o telling us policy before. Orgo is hard but he made it worse & wasn't considerate of online learning.
Ochem is a hard subject but Nelson makes it easier to understand. For the online class, he gave us 6 quizzes and no exams. The quiz format is a little stressful due to the time constraint. Gives sapling homework which is nice considering many profs do now. Do the practice problems, read the book, and you will do well!
if you're taking orgo, DO NOT TAKE honors with Nelson! Not clear grading criteria; 5 days before the final, penalized us 100s of points for late work(hw 40 mins late 0, 10 min late quizzes 0). unapproachable and often talked condescendingly to students in recitation. difficult and unnecessary topics that even UTAs couldn't help with sometimes.
I loved having Dr. Nelson for OChem. His lectures tell you everything you need to know for quizzes, and as long as you pay close attention in class, take good notes, and read the textbook, you'll do just fine.
This might just be because I took him on zoom, but he was terrible and you should avoid him AT ALL COSTS. He's very condescending and expects way too much. We had no exams just quizzes, but they were like 6-8 open response questions that we had to complete, scan, then upload within 15 minutes. Literally impossible. He sucks.
He is very condescending and somewhat disrespectful towards students. The entire grade is made up of tests, so you have to do very well on those or you will fail. He explains material decently, but when you ask for clarification or help you will not get any. Also does not answer emails. Overall not the worst, but definitely nowhere near the best.
Ochem is a tough subject, but Dr. Nelson makes topics straight forward in lecture. The homework problems are good practice and count for a good portion of your grade, so that only benefits you. You definitely have to practice if you want to do well. Stay above the exam averages and your grade will probably be decent, he curves generously.
He had very limited office hours. He knew organic chemistry was hard but he didnt try to make it any easier.
Nelson was frustrating in Ochem 1. His assigned homeworks were typically unlike any exam questions, and we received the bare minimum in forms of review. It seemed like he was very unenthusiastic about having to teach on most days. Not a horrible instructor, but try someone else for Ochem 1.
This class is tough, and you really have to work for your grade. Do his practice problems he gives before exams, re-do achieve problems for exam practice, and use the textbook and other online resources! His lectures are good in my opinion, so take careful notes. It's a lot of work, but a decent grade is possible, with the generous curve he gives
Scott is a nice guy but if your brain is not wired like Einstein's you won't pass this class. He's a very understanding professor and even cracks a couple jokes here and there but the concepts he expects you to understand with absolutely no background knowledge are impossible. The TAs didn't even know half the material because it was so complex.
his class was an absolute nightmare, but the curve at the end was enormous and 20% of your grade is hw, which not a lot of ochem profs do. he provides slides with examples which were kind of useful to have as a guideline, but definitely do not mimick the difficulty of his tests. lectures were kinda dry, mostly self taught myself from youtube
Pretty good professor when it comes to explaining OChem 1 topics. He is kinda disrespectful and arrogant, but his ability to teach makes up for that. His class is 2 tests and homework that is equivalent to a third test. He also has a final and you can't drop an exam. You definitely gotta work for your grade and study for like a few days/week or so.
He should not be a teacher. He wanted us to just already know most of the material. And after an exam with a very low class average, he blamed the students: "I'm not saying I'm disappointed, but, come on, it wasn't even that hard!" Awful teacher. Doesn't care about excuses, doesn't allow you to ask questions unless it's during office hours.
I think Dr. Nelson gets a bad reputation. His lectures are absolutely amazing , and he is incredibly intelligent. If you need help, just ask him and he will meet with you. I think his biggest drawback is that he is out of touch with how it feels to be a student. If you keep up with material (DONT GET BEHIND) and get help when needed you'll be fine.
I would say Professor Nelson is definitely the best choice for ochem 1! If I had to retake, I'd retake it with him. His lectures are very clear and not too overwhelming, and his exams are fine as long as you understand the lectures and do the textbook practice problems.
The final is basically a biochem exam. No other professor makes kids memorize so much or even cover the last three chapters so in depth. Save yourself and dont take him.
ochem 2 is a hard class, so don't expect to not work hard and get a good grade. nelson is an amazing lecturer, and will not test you on material he does not teach in class. he focuses a lot on real world examples from bio which makes the class more interesting. go to every class, spend ~ 30 min everyday reviewing, and do the textbook problems
clear and amusing lecturer. though sometimes he gets so comfortable with ochem that he starts to sound somewhat bored of the topic he's teaching. for practice, he has recommended textbook problems which haven't helped me much, and posts a (by no means exhaustive) problem set before each exam. achieve serves more as a knowledge check than practice.
Dr. Nelson is by far the best professor to take for OChem 2. He is an amazing lecturer with really good powerpoints. He does not test on things that he does not discuss in class and most are referenced within his powerpoints. He also has a HW grade which can bump up your grade. As long as you study and keep up it should be fine.
Dr. Nelson is a good orgo 2 professor. His slides were well organized and I liked how he explained the material. His voice can sometimes be a little monotone, but he was a little goofy every once in a while. He was also very helpful during office hours and was a caring professor. He loves to tell you how much chemicals would cost you.
Nelson was a decent oChem prof. Took a minute to adjust to his teaching style. Tests are tough but fair, the worksheets are important for understanding concepts. You won't pass if you skip lectures. Dry sense of humor and kinda monotone. Curves is pretty big. Tips: - OFFICE HOURS - TEXTBOOK PROBLEMS (difficult but worth it) - JOECHEM (on YouTube)
I think Nelson is a amazing lecturer. He uses slides and explains concepts very well. If you skip lecture, you will be behind. Make sure to do his problem sets and try to make sure you have a very comprehensive understanding of the concepts. Lastly, go to office hours, do the textbook exercises, and some JoeChem. Curve is very generous at the end.
Nelson only grades on exams. There are no homework/quiz grades that can help boost your grade. Not attending his lectures can be costly and it will be difficult to understand concepts. Make sure to start preparing for this exams atleast a week before. His exams were way harder than the practice problems he gave, so be prepared for that.
Dr. Nelson is a good lecturer, but I did not enjoy anything else about his class. I studied 2 hours per day every lecture and extra on weekends, visited study lab, and went to TA office hours and was not able to make above a C in his class. Is very stingy with partial credit. Scored average on all exams and slightly above average on final.
The G in Scott G. Nelson stands for Goat. Lectures were extremely engaging and interesting and exams were pretty much straight from the problem set. The average being low was a reflection of the students not studying rather than Nelson, but it made the curve really nice so that's good. Take him at all costs.
Dr. Nelson is a very knowledgeable professor who is passionate about ochem. He is a tough grader with a very specific rubric and little partial credit. The class averages on the exams were very low (varied 44% to 64%) but the curve at the end is large. He is a solid choice but you must do well on exams to do well in this class 70% midterm 30% final
He's pretty arrogant, though this is prob unintentional. His lectures are engaging and he loves teaching you more in office hourse (GO!!). Exams are tougher than problem sets so you've gotta know the material inside and out. Overall, easier than some of the other profs but you might feel unprepared for orgo 2. Teaches NMR which is central to lab.
Dr. Nelson is a great lecturer. I found problem sets to be more helpful than the textbook. Be ready to set a lot of time outside the course to prepare for the class. The tests require deep knowledge of reactions and what is to occur within a given scenario. Go to his office hours. You learn a lot even though it's not an easy course by any means.
I took O-Chem 1 as a first semester freshman. I did well on the first test (65/70) but I flopped on the other and final (59/80 and 71/100) but I still ended up with an A. The curve was AMAZING. For reference, Scott doesn't curve until the very end of the semester, and for our class anything above a 73% or so ended up being an A. You'll be okay
This is a summary of Professor Nelson AKA Professor Curve 1. Not a great lecturer, so be prepared to self-teach yourself 2. Offers problem sets once a week, but they are useless and has nothing to do with the exam 3. A very very very funny person 4. The exams are very easy and the average tends to be rlly low 5. The curve is 20% at the end
Go to office hours!!! He is willing to help and super nice. He only grades on exams, but he has great curve. Make sure you go to class. His tests are hard because you need to really understand mechanisms & reactions, but if you do the problem sets, go to office hours, and study in a group, an A is doable!!
Very good availability outside of class and responds quickly to emails. Exams are nothing like recommended textbook problems and much harder, although similar to problem sets but only releases one a week making it hard to get enough practice for all topics. Tends to explain one topic really well and then rush the rest of lecture to stay on schedule
Great lectures. Explained concepts in-depth very well. Posts slides beforehand. Not a lot of practice in class making it hard to apply concepts for tests. Weekly worksheets could only prepare you so much for the exam. Book problems sometimes unhelpful, too many to do all of them. Only graded on exams. Helpful in office hours. Big curve.
10/10 lecturer, really good at explaining everything multiple different ways during class which makes it easier to understand everything. Tough class, only one person had above an 85 exam average this semester so don't listen to the people who say its easy (they probably had a B- or lower average and just got a curve). HWs are realistic to exams.
Professor Nelson is a tough but fair instructor. His lectures can be dry, so self-studying with the textbook and unstuckstudy is a must. Exams are challenging but the curve is generous. Going to office hours is key to success.
chill dude. nice midwestern twang. tough class, nothing to do with him. optional textbook problems. also gives practice problem sets, studied using those and joechem. has a focus on biochem applications which some love, some don't. needed to memorize structures of 15 sugars and 20 amino acids. wasn't too bad. curves each test
Nelson is the most overrated, underperforming professor I've met. It's not normal for a professor to have such abominable avgs, but a professor does a poor job at preparing his students & writes exams that is almost impossible to study for—that's the horrid outcome. He has a good curve, but that's if you even make it past his “seeming” nice curve
Loved him for Orgo 1. NOT FOR 2. The class was overly hard- his averages were regularly in the 40s, never above 60. Gave us almost no practice problems- only 10 before the exam, and some textbook questions which weren't helpful. Main issue is that he made the second half of orgo into biochem. He is a pretty good lecturer, has a dry sense of humor
If you are someone who learns organic chemistry through slides, he is no doubt the best professor. Very clean & through, which contains all tested material. Has a dry humor that can rub off as passive-aggressive to some, but doesn't mean it at all. Heavily curves tests. Loves to show applications of organic chemistry that is tested on as well.
Definitely not the worst. Didn't give a lot of extra study materials outside of the textbook and the 10 question problem set before exams. Good lecturer and he gave a lot of practical applications which was interesting. Graded on 3 exams + final + ALEKS homework and the averages were always super low. Very gracious curve but put the effort in.
Good lectures, really goes in depth. Posts slides beforehand. Not much practice - only 10 questions before each exam. Book practice not helpful. Had an extra video lecture each week - inconvenient since he posted it very late. Every Friday he would do reactions from the week. ALEKS was waste of time. Could improve on teaching how to problem solve.
Nelson made very clear what he expected of us to know and what would be on the exams. The textbook was not useful to me, and neither was ALEKS hw. Do the few practice problems he provides, go to lecture, and go to office hours if you are struggling and the class is not so bad.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
34%
Textbook Required
35%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.21 avg changeRatings by Course
CHEM0300
5.0
(1)OCHEM0320
5.0
(1)0320
5.0
(1)0330
5.0
(1)OCHEM310
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
ORGANIC
5.0
ORGANICI
5.0
0740
5.0
CHEM0730
4.7
CHEM0330
4.5