1.9

Stephanie Wooster

Art History - Grand Valley State University

1.9
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
92
Reviews
1.9
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
1.7
Helpful
2.1
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

92

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
92 total ratings

5

2

4

5

3

20

2

36

1

29

What Students Say

Worst teacher ever, talks about content that is not relevant, and rambles on

ART101 - 2.0 rating

It's true that she isn't a great teacher and that she is basically our book in human form

ART101 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Not enough grade data to predict

Rating Trend

Improving

+0.92 avg change
Dec
Jan
Mar
Apr
May
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ART221

3.0

(2)

ART101

2.1

(87)

ART65

2.0

(1)

MTH110

1.0

(1)
Difficulty by Course

ART65

5.0

ART221

5.0

MTH110

4.0

ART101

3.9

Reviews (91)
2.0
5.0
ART101
Oct 17, 2007

Worst teacher ever, talks about content that is not relevant, and rambles on. She teaches straight out of the book, and doesn't have a clue how to teach.

3.0
3.0
ART101
Oct 24, 2007

No Comments

3.0
1.0
ART101
Oct 24, 2007

It's true that she isn't a great teacher and that she is basically our book in human form. BUT she is getting better with experience through this semester. And the course is pretty easy. I would probably recommend someone else though.

1.0
2.0
ART101
Oct 24, 2007

she is a very boring teacher, mostly all of her tests come from the book, if you want to learn anything in the class stay home and read the book, all she does in her lectures is talk about paintings. i use to like art before, but she just makes it so boring taht it's unbearible.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Oct 31, 2007

When you walk into class with her, its a given that she'll be perverbially reading out of the text book to you, its also a given that it'll be tedious work just to sit in her class, if i were aneibreated and went to her class, i'd probably learn more

2.0
4.0
ART101
Nov 4, 2007

wooster is off on her own planet, and a lot of times she messes things up and kinda expects us to just be able to read her mind so we know what she is talking about

1.0
4.0
ART101
Nov 4, 2007

she is the worst teacher i have ever had. she expects way too much from her students. she never looks up from the book she is reading. if you want to do well in this class dont go. ive done better in this class by reading the book and taking notes myself. as a bonus you dont have to listen to that stupid voice she has.

2.0
5.0
ART101
Nov 7, 2007

I dont like this teacher at all. This class is my HARDEST class, yes, ART is my hardest class. ridic.

2.0
5.0
ART101
Nov 7, 2007

there is way too much infromation on the exams to know for only three chapters. she also isnt very clear on what we need to know for the exam. dont take this class if you can its super hard. like 400 level class hard

1.0
5.0
ART101
Nov 12, 2007

Wooster is a moron. She doesn't cover all of the material which is on the exams, and half the material which she DOES cover ISN'T on the exams! I stopped going to class after a few weeks because you can learn the material better by just reading out of the book. By far the worst professor I have, and I can't believe she is still employed.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Nov 13, 2007

Horrible.

1.0
4.0
ART101
Nov 14, 2007

My class with Professor Wooster was her first class teaching in America. Her lectures are dreadful to sit through and her exams contain much more material than should ever be expected from a level 100 course. I would never take another course from her nor do I recommend anyone else to.

3.0
4.0
ART101
Nov 23, 2007

She has no organization...

1.0
5.0
ART101
Nov 27, 2007

GET OUT! worst class you could sign up for. find a different class to satisfy the gen. ed. lectures are absolutely useless and frustrating, no notes or outlines are supplied. She rambles on without clear organization. If you are smart enough to be on rate my professor, hopefully you gave yourself enough time to get out of this class.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Nov 27, 2007

She is such a horrible teacher! She is by far my least favorite teacher. she is not helpful at ALL. If you have her i would recommend switching professors now.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 1, 2007

The worst teacher i have ever experienced in my life, any student in the class could have tought it just as well or better than her.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 4, 2007

GO TO YOUR BANNER AND GET OUT NOW! she has got to be the worst prof i have ever had. the materials she gives you to study are like 10 pages long and the exams are really hard. lectures are pointless, but its what's kinda, but not really on the exam. don't really need a book either (i got away without one). Even my discussion prof doesn't like her!!

2.0
4.0
ART101
Dec 6, 2007

I stopped going to her lectures because I was better off reading the book by myself. The material isnt too hard but there is ALOT of it! She spent time on bad info and skipped through her own notes, didnt put any notes online, wouldnt accept a late paper by one day. despite her being useless I read the book,took my own notes and got B's on exams.

2.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 8, 2007

Ms. Wooster is a very boring teacher. She primarily reads from her notes and the slides are very hard to follow. The tests are difficult. I emailed her questions a few times and she took a long time to respond. Plus, she was pretty rude in her response. I thought this class was supposed to be art appreciation, it was art history though.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 8, 2007

The tests are very difficult, she is boring/ useless, and she is a horrible teacher. i haven't learned anything in this class. She is so vague about what is going to be on exams. It's basically a guess as to what is going to be on it.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 9, 2007

Do not take this class. After this class, you will become worthless, and you will have no value on this earth.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 13, 2007

She's incredibly confusing, unclear and a horrible instructor altogether. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS TO FILL A GEN ED....take film or something, i hear that's good. if you're interested in art at all, this is not the class for you...she's horrible! even on blackboard, she manages to confuse people! DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!!!!

2.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 14, 2007

She just didn't seem to care about the students

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 14, 2007

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. I'm not even kidding. I took it to fill a gen ed... DON'T DO IT. It's NOT a good idea. She's seriously the worst teacher ever. She's confusing, her voice is obnoxious, and you will not learn ANYTHING.

3.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 15, 2007

VERY DIFFICULT CLASS! If you want to be lazy and not put in the work this class is not for you. I passed and did decent but her exams are very hard and the discussion class thats mandetory is a pain to go to but she's a nice lady though.

3.0
3.0
ART101
Dec 20, 2007

I mean this class was boring, but not that hard. She gave an extra credit quiz to help the first test score, and a study guide that covered everything on the second exam. It wasn't the traditional 101 level class though, id switch to like theater 101 or something.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Jan 1, 2008

All she does is lecture the whole class and her lectures often come right from the text. Very boring class, hard to pay attention. You really need to read the text book to pass. Test are very hard and has a lot of material on them. Goes through a lot of stuff very fast.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Jan 8, 2008

Horrible. She does not make the class or the material we're learning interesting at all. She also talks through her nose so I couldn't stand the sound of her voice. She lectures straight from the book but it's all hard to absorb so in order to get the material, you have to read the book before every exam. I would not recommend this class.

2.0
3.0
ART101
Feb 26, 2008

I hated this class, and I think it had mostly to do with her teaching style (or lack thereof). She went directly from powerpoints and the book, which was so mind-numbingly boring, I slept through most of the classes. I would NOT reccommend her AT ALL to anyone, no matter how much you like art.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Feb 26, 2008

zzzzzzzzzzz....oh sorry... wow shes boring, and the voice is guarenteed to go up your back. I liked art before I came to this class and now... well lets say my opinion has changed! Take someone else if you want to get anything out of it...

2.0
4.0
ART101
Mar 20, 2008

RUN IF YOU LIKE LIFE... She is the worst prof i have ever had! Her voice is so god awful, it drives me insane! Her voice waivers all the time and it sounds like she's going to cry half the time. Every class she stands at the desk, flips through slides, and reads directly from her notes...

2.0
4.0
ART101
Mar 27, 2008

Oh my god...so so boring! Unless you want to hear the phrase "and what have you" about 15 times per lecture and listen to her talk through her nose...wouldnt recommend her. Her tests basically had nothing to do with what she said in lecture anyways.

1.0
4.0
ART101
Mar 27, 2008

Hands down the worst professor I have ever had. Very dull, monotone, rather listen to nails screeching down a chalkboard, voice. Do yourself a favor and don't take her.

1.0
4.0
ART101
Mar 29, 2008

This class was by far the worst class I ever took at GV.Not only was she completely BORING, but her tests were very random and hard. Attendance was not manditory (I hardly went) and she posted her slides on BB. The only grades she had in the class were from the Exams, luckily the discussion class brought up my grade a lot. NEVER TAKE THIS CLASS!

3.0
3.0
ART101
Mar 30, 2008

Seriously this class will ruin your life. It's not hard at all, in fact, you really don't even have to go if you don't want to [just make sure you go to your discussion section, that's where your grade pretty much comes from, anyways]. She is an extremely annoying professor, if you can even call her that. Her favorite phrase is "what have you".

2.0
1.0
ART101
Apr 22, 2008

Basically you have to memorize the book and her slides for exams. There is no learning involved. Reading the book isn't really necessary if you actually go to class. I'd have to agree with everyone else, her favorite saying was, "what have you."

2.0
4.0
ART101
Apr 25, 2008

I would recommend switching out of this class if you alreday signed up. She is a nice lady, but bad teacher. Class is boring and tests are hard.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Apr 29, 2008

don't take this professor!!! she is way too hard for a intro class!!! and she treats her students like they're in 1st grade. she is not clear on what to know but expects you to know way too much for exams. take another professor. she's terrible and not to mention boring

2.0
5.0
ART101
May 5, 2008

Wooster makes this class really boring! The huge amount of material covered and boring sound of her voice makes this class almost impossible! Her standards greatly exceed the level of an introductory class. If you are not interested in art history, don't take this class! I studied ALOT and struggled to get a B in this class!

3.0
3.0
ART101
Jul 14, 2008

I love art but she really made it as boring as possible to learn about it. She's probably really good at teaching it but it was just hard to stay focused. The tests were tricky at times and you really had to have the individual eras down pat. Her lectures were very organized though, so you could clearly follow along.

2.0
5.0
ART65
Sep 15, 2008

Her lectures are super boring and this class is way to hard for a 100 level class.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Oct 10, 2008

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS! Ms. Wooster was extremely rude in the few exchanges I had with her. The class is pointless and she is the most boring teacher I've ever come across. She just reads from lecture slides in a monotone voice. She was always the only person laughing at her own jokes. Exams were extremely difficult considering it's an intro class.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Oct 13, 2008

do anything you can to not take this class!!! all i do is listen to music when i show up to lecture! boring boring boring!! i spend more time on my phone than i do taking notes!

3.0
4.0
ART101
Oct 15, 2008

Professor Wooster is not very professional. She frequently cusses in class. Classes tend to be quite boring. However, she is good at letting us know what we need to study for exams, and she covers the information well.

2.0
3.0
ART101
Nov 3, 2008

This woman will drive you crazy if you take her class. She fades in and out of the microphone and blames everything on technology. Her lectures will put you to sleep, but you will be shocked into consciousness when her voice occasionally shouts things, and then other times it sounds like she is crying... I wouldn't do it if I were you.

1.0
3.0
ART101
Nov 17, 2008

unclear

2.0
4.0
ART101
Nov 27, 2008

Thiss class is way to hard for a 101 course. I test were worded tricky and they were VERY hard. I would not recommend this class to anyone.

2.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 4, 2008

Way too difficult for a 101 class. Very boring and her voice is annoying. If at all possible find a different lecture professor.

2.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 5, 2008

Very tough and boring class. I would recommend taking a different professor if possible. Exams were hard.

1.0
4.0
MTH110
Dec 7, 2008

Wooster is an ok teacher is you are good at math, she picks her favorites and sticks with them. If you are at all questionable about your ability in math, don't take her..she is not one for helpfulness at all.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 7, 2008

She is not a very good teacher. She doesn't realize that not everyone loves art. Exams way to hard for 100 level class.

3.0
4.0
ART101
Dec 8, 2008

People seriously, sometimes you have to listen to your parents and JUST SAY NO!

2.0
4.0
ART101
Dec 8, 2008

If you can take any other professor, do it. She is extremely boring, and her lectures are not helpful. As mentioned, she likes to blame anything that goes wrong on technology. Canceled 2 lectures because she couldn't get her computer to work. Also had a lot of problems with microphone which was extremely annoying. That's about all I remember from l

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 8, 2008

Horrible Teacher

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 9, 2008

Not a good teacher.Unless you want to be required to know everything and every piece of art that has been made over the last 500 years. Do not take her.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 9, 2008

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASSSS. I am interested in art/art history, but there has not been a lecture that I've attended that I have not fallen asleep unless I've had 3 cups of coffee. Way too hard for a level 100 class.

2.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 11, 2008

Terrible teacher, terrible lecture sessions, and terrible grading scale. I reccomend that you do NOT take this class

3.0
2.0
ART101
Dec 12, 2008

Although her class was boring, as long as you went to class, took notes, and studied the test were easy... she was extremely helpful during office hours. Class wasn't interesting but going is the only way to pass the class.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Dec 16, 2008

This teacher has a terrible way of teaching. She teaches way too many things at once and expects every one to remember every piece of information for the exams. I could not get better than a C on her exams! Terrible class/teacher!

3.0
3.0
ART101
Dec 31, 2008

Overall not the worst gen ed. ive had to take at gv. Honestly attending the lectures were pointless and i used my lecture notes almost never. However, she does post a study guide for each of the three tests on bb which completely lays out everything from the exam. Read the book on what she tells you in the study guide and you will have succeed.

4.0
2.0
ART101
Jan 20, 2009

Seriously not even CLOSE to being as bad as everyone makes her out to be. Speaks very clearly and lays out all you need to know. Anyone who complains/can't succeed in her class probably won't do any better in another class; this is about as basic and straight forward as it gets. Give her a break, just read the book and put a little effort into it

4.0
3.0
ART101
Feb 4, 2009

Wooster was entertaining, to say the least. "Sassy" is a good word to describe her. Her tests weren't really easy, but if you go to class every day and study the notes, you won't have a problem. I thought she was funny when she yelled at people. :-P

3.0
3.0
ART101
Apr 13, 2009

She is ok. She isn't terrible but she isn't the greatest professor. It's a lecture so you can't expect too much. She can be pretty boring but somethings are a little interesting. I wouldn't go out of my way to have her but I wouldn't avoid her either...

1.0
5.0
ART101
Apr 27, 2009

Awful awful teacher. I stopped going to her lectures because i couldn't stand her snobbish condescending attitude toward others. She once said, "you can usually tell when something is amateur art because it isn't very good"... which really irks me. Comments like that made it hard for me to stand her at all. She's not easy, though i managed a B+.

5.0
3.0
ART101
Jul 6, 2009

She actually teaches a real university lecture course! Hurray!

5.0
4.0
ART101
Jul 6, 2009

I was surprised that we didn't learn about more artists especially architects, but it is just a very broad art appreciation course. She only covers a fraction of the artists that are in the book. I love classical and medieval art and she didn't cover those chapters! Take one of the art history survey courses if you want more info on artists.

4.0
2.0
ART101
Aug 31, 2009

This was a straightforward introductory class. Take some notes read the book. Easy A actually more work involved in the discussion sect than the lect.

3.0
2.0
ART101
Oct 28, 2009

She talks a lot and is very excited to teach this class, can be very annoying.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Dec 12, 2009

Her annoying voice made it hard to focus sometimes during class. Notes were basic and easy enough to follow it seemed. Tests were all over the place with subject matter and you never knew what needed to be studied and didn't. She gives off a condescending attitude towards the entire class in general. Don't take the class period if it's just gen ed.

2.0
3.0
ART101
Dec 12, 2009

Most of her lectures had exact quotes from wikipedia. Not a helpful professor at all.

3.0
1.0
ART101
Dec 14, 2009

The class is easy enough. If you attend class and read the textbook, its pretty much a guaranteed A. However, if you can't stand an annoying voice or a limited vocabulary, not a good choice.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Dec 21, 2009

Alright.. shes not a bad professor, BUT, shes awfully boring, her voice is nasally and annoying, and for a class that you expect to be easy, she takes it way too seriously.

4.0
5.0
ART221
Dec 27, 2009

She was pretty helpful, especially if you go to her office office hours. Her lectures are pretty intense and her exams are really hard. She really knows the subject though.

3.0
5.0
ART101
Jan 11, 2010

do whatever you can to not take her. most boring professor ever. would not recommend to anybody. plus her exams are unbelievably hard for a 101 class.

2.0
5.0
ART221
Mar 19, 2010

Terrible teacher. She is very boring and the amount of work required for her class is ridiculous. She requires you to know a large amount of information you wont use or will use very little amounts of. I do not remember almost anything from that class.

3.0
3.0
ART101
Mar 24, 2010

Overall the class wasn't horrible. If you take notes on everything in class, and read the chapters, you should be fine for the exams. I made flashcards before the exams and that seemed to help a lot. She gets mad about people talking, which is understandable, but she needs to understand that it's a gen ed class.

1.0
5.0
ART101
Mar 26, 2010

Easily the WORST professor at grand valley. Very unclear, doesn't care how the students do in her class, and overall bad teacher. Do NOT take her

2.0
3.0
ART101
Mar 30, 2010

She gets really into the lectures and seems like she knows what she's talking about. If you want a good grade definately read the chapters and make flashcards for the tests. I wouldn't recommend her, but I dont know what the other ART 101 professors are like

3.0
4.0
ART101
Mar 31, 2010

She is very into what she teaches, which can be REALLY annoying at times. If you listen to her talk, you can become very annoyed with her. The class itself is okay, takes notes on every detail discussed in lecture, but i never read the text book

2.0
5.0
ART101
Apr 1, 2010

Avoid this class! Do not buy the book either. She thinks all of her students are Art majors, and the tests resemble that. She is not worth the Gen. Ed. credit, take MUS 100 or CTH 101 (Theatre) instead.

3.0
3.0
ART101
Apr 5, 2010

She lists everything thats going to be on the exams on blackboard.The exams aren't bad.To the people complaining about doing bad on her exams, I can't imagine them doing much better in any of their other classes. This is pretty straightforward.This is college people.step it up a notch. Just because it's a gen-ed doesnt mean you don't have to study.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Apr 12, 2010

BORING! No interest in art at all. Material gets more difficult and less interesting. Her voice reminds me of nails on a chalkboard. Not impressed with this class.

3.0
4.0
ART101
Apr 23, 2010

unfortunately she is the only lecture professor. her voice makes me want to punch babies and she is just plain rude to students at times. take peters for discussion hes great. it will almost make up for wooster

3.0
1.0
ART101
Apr 24, 2010

LIke other comments have indicated, her voice is kind of annoying. Luckily, my roomate took the class last year and gave me notes so I havent attended the last 6 lectures. Other than that, its an easy class if you study and know the terms and such. THe exams are straight forward and pretty easy.

4.0
2.0
ART101
Apr 26, 2010

Lectures were kind of dry, but mostly because there were 200+ people in there, so there wasn't any real room for interaction. I thought her voice was fine, don't know what the others below were complaining about. You do need to pay attention, though, the exams are pretty comprehensive. Overall I enjoyed it, though the discussion section was better.

1.0
3.0
ART101
Apr 27, 2010

Worst professor i have had so far. Her voice is enough to drive you away. Very boring, useless, and hard class. This final is the one i had to study the most for.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Apr 28, 2010

Bad teacher, her exams are hard and she doesn't explain the material well she just tells you to read out of the book.

2.0
4.0
ART101
Apr 29, 2010

Her voice will put you to sleep. The material isn't hard, but this final was my hardest. Has a bad attitude as well.

1.0
5.0
ART101
May 1, 2010

This professor was very unclear and went off on rants the majority of the time. The first exam was the easiest. The rest have slide identifications, you must know time periods, and the specifics of those time periods. It didn't appear to be taught like a 100 level course, or a gen-ed.

2.0
1.0
ART101
May 6, 2010

Awful. She is terrible at giving lectures! The way she mispronounces and messes up with speaking is kind of funny sometimes, but mostly annoying. She talks about how hard you have to study all the time, but I didn't even buy the book and I got an A. Easy class but obnoxious professor.

2.0
2.0
ART101
Sep 23, 2010

She had a terribly annoying voice and her lectures were pretty boring. You can still go to lecture half the time, take down the terms she puts on slides and play games all class and not pay attention and get an A.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Not enough grade data to predict

Rating Trend

Improving

+0.92 avg change
Dec
Jan
Mar
Apr
May
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ART221

3.0

(2)

ART101

2.1

(87)

ART65

2.0

(1)

MTH110

1.0

(1)
Difficulty by Course

ART65

5.0

ART221

5.0

MTH110

4.0

ART101

3.9

Similar Professors