3.8

Stephen Bronner

Political Science - Rutgers - State University of New Jersey

3.8
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
60%
Would Retake
92
Reviews
3.8
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.6
Helpful
3.9
Clarity

60%

Would Retake

92

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
92 total ratings

5

41

4

26

3

11

2

6

1

8

What Students Say

I'm a senior and this is the first class I ever dropped and took a W in

NAZIISM - 2.0 rating

I would only take this if you're amazing at everything poll sci

NOP101 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

29%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

80% confidence
Based on 10 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
B+ (2)
Drop/Withdrawal (1)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(0)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 11 reported grades
A: 7
B+: 2
Drop/Withdrawal: 1
C: 1
Common Tags
Respected (2)
Amazing lectures (2)
Get ready to read (2)
Gives good feedback (1)
Hilarious (1)
LECTURE HEAVY (1)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (1)
Participation matters (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.11 avg change
Jan
Nov
Jun
May
Jul
Oct
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

361

5.0

(1)

790377

5.0

(1)

POLITICS

5.0

(1)

NATUREPOLI

5.0

(1)

POL363

5.0

(1)
+46 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HOBBESTOMILL

5.0

WSTTRD

5.0

POLIT100

5.0

NATUR101

5.0

POLI316

5.0

Reviews (91)
4.0
3.0
POL101
Mar 26, 2003

i have him for nature of politics. interesting guy, gets off topic alot. he doesnt seem to really cover the material you're tested on in lecture so i guess you really dont have to go. just go to recitation b/c your TA is who grades, Bronner doesnt.

4.0
2.0
POLISCI10
Apr 3, 2003

Professor Bronner is one of the best professors at Rutgers. He is very well spoken, and really knows his information. If you're majoring in PoliSci, you should take him.

4.0
3.0
NATOFPOL
Apr 9, 2003

highly recommended...very interesting class. this guy knows what he is talking about and is pretty clear in conveying the information to the class

2.0
2.0
NATOFPOL
Apr 9, 2003

really, really unclear, gets off subject..too cynical to the point where you're not sure what he's trying to teach...but you don't really need to go to class. smart guy though

5.0
3.0
POLITICS
Apr 15, 2003

No Comments

5.0
1.0
NATUREPOLI
May 9, 2003

he reminds me of a slighty **** dr. evil-but he def knows his stuff and his class is a good time

2.0
3.0
NATOFPOL
May 14, 2003

All I have to say is he is the Advisor for the Socialist Communist group on campus and resembles Dr. Evil exactly!!

5.0
2.0
POL363
Sep 11, 2003

Had three classes with him. 300 level and defended a thesis before him. Fanatastic professor if you don't get intimidated by a intellectual socialist look-alike of Dr. Evil. He can handle a good comeback and is funny and accomodating if you don't whine.

5.0
3.0
NATPOL
Sep 16, 2003

just great

2.0
2.0
NATUREPOL
Sep 28, 2003

No Comments

5.0
2.0
NATOFPOL
Sep 29, 2003

Incredibly smart guy, great lectures, and not too difficult to do well as long as you take good notes in class (the exams are essays, and lectures tell you exactly what to write for your essays). However, he can be a little arrogant... But a good prof.

1.0
4.0
MARXISM
Nov 5, 2003

He's very learned and knows a lot, he's just very arrogant and cannot go 5 minutes without dropping a name. His curriculum is very strict and he is just blegh...

5.0
2.0
361
Nov 5, 2003

very smart guy, knows his stuff very well and thinks very intriguingly. only one grade though.

1.0
5.0
MARXISM
Feb 7, 2004

the man is way too masculine and arrogant. thinks he knows everything. seemed to consider male students' thoughts more meaningful. doesn't matter how smart he is. his arrogance and exclusion remind me of highschool clique-types. gives socialists a bad nam

1.0
1.0
NATOFPOL
Apr 13, 2004

The class is so easy, but no thanks to Bronner- grade depends on TA. You don't really need to go to class, just two papers (one midterm and one final) on about 10 books that you have to read--but you can use cliff's notes for them!! :-)

5.0
3.0
MARXISM
Apr 15, 2004

The guy's a Rutgers allstar. The essay tests aren't based directly on lectures, but the lectures are interesting and interactive.

4.0
1.0
MARX101
Apr 21, 2004

He's a good guy, its easy to see why people would not like him, but its not because he's a bad teacher. Opinionated to the left, but that doesn't mean you have to agree with him. He's definately brilliant though.

4.0
3.0
MARXISM
May 4, 2004

No matter what anyone says, this man knows what he is talking about, and is truly versed in the politics of the left. I honestly think he inspires a lot of students to think more critically (therefore intelligently) about the world. if you open your ears.

4.0
3.0
NATPOL
May 18, 2004

Bronner is a great lecturer. Very opionated. I never took a Poli Sci Class before and he really made me enjoy his lectures. TA decides your grades. I barely worked on the papers and ended up with a B. Didnt do any reading either. Pay attention in class.

3.0
3.0
NATOFPOL
May 18, 2004

Very smart but also very arrogant and extremely opinionated, tries to mold students mind to believe what he does, other than that hes ok

5.0
3.0
790377
May 18, 2004

bronner is a great lecturer... very socialist ... i dug him

1.0
3.0
POLLITART
Jul 2, 2004

No Comments

5.0
4.0
MARX
Jul 30, 2004

He is probably the most brilliant professor at Rutgers. He teaches students to think critically. Subject material is very difficult, but i really got more than you can imagine out of the class

5.0
4.0
NOFP
Aug 7, 2004

A lot of people don't like him because he's tough and opinionated, but I think HE'S GREAT. If you really like polysci go to class early and sit up front, he's almost always early too and will talk with students about anything.

4.0
4.0
790101
Sep 18, 2004

I liked the class despite the difficulty of reading seven or ten books in that class. Bronner is an articulate and outspoken person who tries to make the class interesting. I liked my TA as well.

4.0
4.0
NATUREOFPOLITIC
Nov 7, 2004

Very interesting guy.. Overall easy class.. didn't have to attend if u didnt want to.. Midterm and Finals are Papers not a bad choice taking this class

5.0
3.0
INTROTOPOL
Dec 22, 2004

Second best professor in the PoliSci department. He is extremely smart and brings out the best in his students. The lectures are incredible, the things he says and his ideas are mindblowing. You will be smarter after taking his class. The readings, all political theory are interesting too.

5.0
2.0
NATUREOFPOLIT
Mar 27, 2005

Best prof at Rutgers, the lectures are inspiring. A lot of reading but if you get it done, you will be fine.

4.0
1.0
NATOFPOLITICS
Apr 12, 2005

Those ratings on helpfulness and clarity are for the TA, Aaron Keck. I don't go to Bronner's lectures, and haven't found a need to. There are two 10-12 page papers that are broken down to 4 essays each. The readings aren't bad, and the essays aren't too hard.

5.0
2.0
790101
May 4, 2005

He is an awesome professor. He is kinda intimidating cause he is so smart. Some call him arrogant, but that is 'cause they get schooled by him in class when trying to show off. he talks about real issues and really is inspiring.

5.0
3.0
NATUREOFPOLIT
May 15, 2005

Very good professor. The grading all depends on the TA's that are under his wing at the time, so you cant predict how the grading will be. Answers all questions, even though he adds his own pompous, and justified, opinion into his response. Helps open your eyes about all the bull&%$# that you think you know.

5.0
2.0
NATOFPOLI
May 22, 2005

Great professor, sit in the front rows and you will really enjoy his lectures. very very opinionated, which is a good thing b/c he's very intelligent. jokes often to keep things flowing.also holds lectures at columbia at times so he is very knowledgeable. Overall, an extremely inspiring class. exams are fair.

5.0
2.0
790101
Grade: B+
May 31, 2005

Bronner is a great professor to have. The knowledge that you receive from him can not be found in any book. With that said, it is not really necessary to go to lecture because your grade depends on your TA. However, I would advise attending his lectures (although they can be hard to comprehend) just because he is such a great speaker.

5.0
4.0
CRITTHEORY
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Aug 17, 2005

hands down the best professor i have experienced at rutgers. truly a liberating educator. his high level political science classes are the best in the field. don't take these classes if youre soft on taking criticism tho. critical thinking is the basis of his school of thought. if you're ready to work, he is the most rewarding professor at rutgers.

5.0
2.0
NATUREOFPOLIT
Grade: C
Sep 2, 2005

The best teacher I ever had at Rutgers!!!!TAKE HIS CLASS he is a very intellectual man and is fun to listen to...you do have to think in his class but you will come away with so much!!!Easy B you have to apply yourself more for an A!!!

5.0
2.0
790101
Sep 2, 2005

This man will rock your world, incredibly learned and tells politics like it is. For a 101 a bit too mindblowing. That he dresses in black always and looks like Dr. Evil...no more needs to be said. Take him before the man silences him!

4.0
3.0
POLISCI
Sep 16, 2005

I really enjoyed Bronner's intro to Poli Sci class!

3.0
3.0
NATUREOFPOLI
Sep 19, 2005

I took him for Nature of Politics as a freshman and I don't think i was ready for his style of teaching. He's a smart guy that comes off as a know it all.

5.0
5.0
HOBBESTOMILL
Sep 28, 2005

No Comments

2.0
3.0
NATUREOFPOLIT
Oct 13, 2005

he's a liberal ass...

3.0
3.0
NATUREOFPOLIT
Oct 29, 2005

Great lectures, great professor. I wrote my paper on a plane and still got an A. Hes the****.

1.0
1.0
NATURE101
Nov 16, 2005

The worst professor I've had since I got to Rutgers. Incredibly full of himself and I'm amazed anyone has a good review for him. Will force you to hate the subject and make you in turn hate humanity in general. Overly caustic and unrealistic.

4.0
2.0
POLISCI101
Grade: A
Dec 11, 2005

Had him for poli sci. 101:nat of politics last spring. Excellent professor. Can't wait to take his Western tradition class next semester.

4.0
2.0
MARXISTTHEORY
Dec 24, 2005

Bronner is by far one of the most unique educators at Rutgers-partly because his background is unique in and of itself. Despite his lust for Rosa Luxemborg (you'll get it some day, a joke), his teaching will extend beyond any particular subject area and challenge you to think like he does: critically out of the box

5.0
3.0
POL101
Jan 17, 2006

Great Lecturer and teacher. If you want to think critically, Bronner is the best resource around. Will make you understand all the bs youve been taught since pre-school, and WHY you were taught it (to keep you docile). Empowers students to think critically and for themselves... you will leave class hating what you loved and loving what you hated.

5.0
2.0
NATUREOFPOL
Jan 19, 2006

I have had Bronner for several courses, and think he is a great professor. He is easily one of the best lectures at Rutgers. However, one warning, Bronner can spew a lot of BS, and this is not to say that he lies, but has some interesting interpretations, but in his defense, like most good professors he seems happy to debate with you . .

4.0
3.0
NATUREOFPOLI
Mar 15, 2006

one of the best intellectual minds in rutgers. more or less he tries to pursue a realist approach, assuming the argument in which the authors in the material are claiming. but the way he teaches forces the student to either challenge himself and think critically, or entirely disagree with him. either way, he succeeds. a great professor.

4.0
2.0
NATURE101
May 5, 2006

if you look up the word ego in the dictionary you will see a picture of him...overall though not a bad class, hes a real smart guy and there are only 2 papers that constitute your whole grade...TA's are very helpful so take advantage. Go to class and you will LEARN alot which is important, i think?

1.0
5.0
WSTTRD
May 12, 2006

WORST PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY!!! Forced the class to buy HIS book, ended up not using it, and the bookstore won't buy it back. All he does is spit out socialist rhetoric and be the most unprofessional, moronic teacher ever. I got an A in this class, but I am SO dissapointed that I wasted my money paying for the credits! AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!

4.0
2.0
790372
May 16, 2006

The person who rated before me is a complete moron. Do not avoid Prof. Bronner because while he is a bit arrogant, his class really does change the way you think about things. Definitley a class worth taking and an incredibly smart professor. Only gives 2 papers but he and his graders are very fair

4.0
4.0
NATURE101
May 17, 2006

He is a great teacher and yes a bit arrogant. He is totally approachable and nice to talk to. Go to recitation, that is most helpful as the prof tends to go off on tangents.

4.0
4.0
POL101
May 17, 2006

Not a bad professor. Just go to recitation, go to lectures, and speak to the TA and Professor, and you'll get an A. The TA does the grading so be cool with the TA... Also, try to read the books b/c it's hard to write a 12 page paper without reading anything... Like I said, you listen to me, you'll get an A...

1.0
4.0
POL101
Jul 12, 2006

Bronner is far and away the worst professor I've had in my 3 years at Rutgers. He spends a decent amount of the class period putting down students' opinions, and he expects everyone to be on his level of intellect. His class has an exhorbinant amount of reading and I failed to gain any knowledge from this man. AVOID at all costs!!

5.0
3.0
MARXISM
Jul 17, 2006

WWAAAAYYYY TOO MUCH LEATHER!!! But brilliant and has a cute dog. As far as how to take his class-- do the reading. I NEVER went to class but did the reading and got a B.

5.0
1.0
NAPOL101
Nov 11, 2006

He was one of the best teachers I've had at Rutgers. The class was easy and interesting. Getting an A is no problem if you read and go to recitation. Very interesting individual.

5.0
2.0
POLS680
Dec 15, 2006

He let me audit his Critical Theory grad course. I've never felt so close to greatness.

3.0
4.0
POLI101
Mar 4, 2007

EXTREMELY intelligent professor and a great in ur face lecturer. Goes off on tangents. 2 papers 12 pages (you choose topics from a list and can write on as many topics as you want.) Read the books THOROUGHLY because it'll help you with the papers. You don't need to go to class if you understand the material. Reci is Mandatory!

3.0
2.0
POL101
Oct 24, 2007

Agreed with SOME of his opinions but hated him with a passion. Had an easy TA. Took him because I was told to wait for him to take Nature of Politics. Also, I never did the reading. Considering political theory isnt my thing, it wasn't that bad to sit through. Although I agree with the person below me...def pompous haha

5.0
4.0
POLS101
Dec 13, 2007

haha Bronner is a great guy, unfortunately he gets bombarded with negative reviews from students with no grasp of politics. Obviously there is room for debate and Bronner doesn't cut that off, he just presents a perspective instead of superficially dilly dallying around the issues.

1.0
5.0
POLIT100
Dec 23, 2007

Stupid professor.....

4.0
1.0
NATPOSECT
Feb 11, 2008

Took Nature of Politics with him Frosh year and now I'm a Junior majoring in it...he's mad funny, crazy, and you got a personality to match his you'll do great! Too bad Ken's no longer his TA cause he was sexy, fun, and easy...the dynamic duo. This got me into politics seriously

3.0
5.0
NATUR101
Mar 5, 2008

babbles on and on

5.0
4.0
MARX01
Mar 11, 2008

I took every class that Bronner offered while I was at Rutgers & learned more from him than all my other professors combined. I am now a philosophy prof myself & owe everything I know about teaching to him. Ha ha he acted out the master/slave dialectic with a TA: priceless. If you're smart, you will like his class. If you are a moron, well. Sorry.

5.0
2.0
POLI101
Mar 25, 2008

PURE BRILLIANCE. 100% Inspiring! Conservatives don't like him because he puts them in their place... UTTERLY AMAZING, TA grading, great curriculum!

4.0
3.0
POLI101
May 10, 2008

Interesting lecturer, there is no doubt about it. Presents you with a different point of view of politics and the world in general. Tends to go off on tangents sometimes. But, its entirely possible to not go to class and end up getting an A. You just have to be a really good writer. Also, your TA determines your grade.

5.0
2.0
NAPOL101
May 15, 2008

Great professor. Very clear in his lectures; takes on the role of whatever person he is talking about and lets you ask questions and answers them "in character" to make understanding the topic & writing your paper easier. I recommend him for sure. Theres a lot of reading to do, but you can get away with it by going to lecture. Very good professor

5.0
2.0
NOP101
May 19, 2008

He is probably one of the best lecturers I have had at Rutgers. He challenges other students' beliefs and really brings out the realities of the world. Students like to bash him, because he makes students actually take responsibility for themselves. Sorry kids if he doesn't give you all the answers!

5.0
4.0
POLI101
Oct 29, 2008

A no nonsense guy who takes no excuse for mediocre work but will help students understand the material. Only midterm and final exams, both essay format. Only attends lectures, good luck with your section TA.

4.0
5.0
POLI316
Oct 29, 2008

Very interesting and intellectually stimulating class. A great mode for learning cultural/racial relations in politics. Difficult class: long hours and crunched schedule. Must attend almost every class in order to have understanding of material. Only a final exam, essay format; questions given beforehand. Read as much text as humanely possible.

5.0
3.0
NAPOL101
Jan 26, 2009

This is the best teacher at rutgers. no ****. very funny and entertaining while intellectually stimulating!! a must experience.

3.0
5.0
POLI101
Jun 24, 2009

I might not be the best person to comment here because I dropped this class halfway through the semester but Bronner is a horrible professor because he keeps on talking about his opinion about politics and how he is always right. He is arrogant and a snob. The class is definitely not easy for a 100 level. Do not take his class

4.0
4.0
MARX378
Dec 11, 2009

The readings were challenging, the exams were torture, and his lectures were tough because of the nature of the course. Saying this, I would most definitely retake this class. Hard readings and demanding papers are not an excuse to say that he is a bad professor, because that he is not. Get your money's worth and learn something!

4.0
5.0
MARXTHRY
Apr 7, 2010

This guy gets a bad rap, this is my second time taking him (101 and Marx) and yes he is hard as hell but you learn SO MUCH. Not for anyone looking for an easy A or even B. He comes off as an ass but thats how he is because he tries to bring about a different train of thought you wouldn't use. 2 12 page papers are the exams (12 questions pick a few)

5.0
4.0
MARX420
Nov 4, 2010

Probably one of the best professors at Rutgers, very smart and makes the subject matter interesting... just pray you don't fall asleep in class, he will give you a rude awakening : )

5.0
4.0
PSCI477
Apr 27, 2011

His classes are so phenomenal they can call your whole world into question. His critical theory and marx classes probably rank among the best across the country. He's also very personable and approachable, but you've got to do the work. If you are a slacker don't bother.

5.0
4.0
POLI395
May 13, 2011

Amazing professor. He pushes students to do more than they thought they could. And you definitely get a different understanding of the world from him. I would recommend this prof to anyone- smart dumb ambitious lazy etc because you will learn a lot about yourself. Just don't expect a typical lecture.

5.0
2.0
MARX377
May 14, 2011

BRONNER IS AWESOME! he is a very intelligent man and i learned a great deal in his class. DO NOT TAKE if you are a slacker! Alot of readings but just a midterm and final paper. i certainly did not work my butt off but i got an A.. its really a matter of understanding the material A MUST TAKE for those who actually want to learn

5.0
3.0
POLIS377
Oct 8, 2011

The man changed my life. Take his classes if you want to open your eyes to the world- his classes are critically important, and immensely meaningful. The hard work will not go to waste. He's the best I've had at Rutgers

2.0
4.0
NAZIISM
Feb 2, 2012

I'm a senior and this is the first class I ever dropped and took a W in. He assigned entire books on a class by class basis, his lectures had no structure or clarity, making it impossible to get a grip on what we were talking about, and he is exceedingly arrogant and condescending towards students.

3.0
2.0
POLI101
Dec 2, 2012

great professor. best at what he does. recognized worldwide. his lecture are pretty confusing if your not a history expert, but they are interesting. don't talk in his class or HE WILL embarrass you. My TA was awesome (Megan). not that easy, just make sure you READ and you'll be fine. oh and almost all the reading are provided on sakai

2.0
4.0
NOP101
Dec 18, 2012

I'm a science major and had no clue what was going on in his class. I learned more in recitation than I ever did in any of his lectures. I was always lost and felt he would berate me if I asked for help. No tests but a 12 page midterm and final paper. I would only take this if you're amazing at everything poll sci. Otherwise- avoid!!

4.0
3.0
MARXISM
Nov 2, 2013

Really awesome guy, interested and excited about the subject. There was a lot of reading but that's to be expected in upper-level courses.

4.0
3.0
POL377
Mar 27, 2014

Truly one of the best professors at Rutgers that I've ever had. Encourages you to be critical and really opens up your mind. If you do not enjoy his lectures it's either because you prefer not to leave you comfort zone or because you aren't really interested in the course. Man knows what he's doing and doing it well.

3.0
2.0
101NOP
Grade: A
Aug 12, 2015

Having a class with him is an experience. Everyone who is a student in PoliSci should take a class with him once and you will learn. Has strong views and was flippant to the point of insulting people, but he is nonetheless a brilliant mind. I do agree with previous comments that assigning whole books on a class by class basis is way too much.

4.0
4.0
NOP101
Dec 17, 2015

3,500 -4,000 word mid term and final (thats it). Intelligent and clear. Read the books and you're golden. cute dog he rarely brings to class too.

4.0
1.0
NATURE101
Grade: B+
Jan 18, 2016

A great professor. He encourages students to think critically. I really enjoyed listening to what he has to say! Grade mostly depends on attending recitations every other week, and a midterm and final that consist of 12 pages. It isn't that bad though, and the TA's really work to help you understand the text.

5.0
4.0
MARX377
Grade: A
Nov 30, 2016
Would take again

The Man is an AMAZING, ENGAGING LECTURER!

Gives good feedback
Respected
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
POL101
Grade: A
Jun 12, 2017
Would take again

Prof Bronner is a real gem at Rutgers. He's probably one of the most famous professors we have, and he makes class interesting by bringing cool guest speakers. He tells great stories about his experiences, from meeting with Syria's President Assad to meeting with the PA. Come to lecture bc he everything on the exams (2 essays) is mentioned in class

Respected
Hilarious
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
101NOP
Grade: A
May 12, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He's okay. Rambles a lot, gets off-topic. He's quite smart and very well-known in the political science field so he has cool stories. Extremely opinionated and will cut you off if he doesn't like your opinion. Recitation is key, though. You'll learn everything you need to know there. Grade is a 9-12 page midterm and final and recitation attendance.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
4.0
MARX377
Grade: A
Jul 24, 2020
Would take again

Retrospective now that he's retired. Taught me more than I was taught for my own major. Class time is everything; be well prepared for the discussion. Only took 300-400 level from him; 101 would be scary. One of the options on every exam: "Make up your own question and answer it." Get ready to think, not memorize and regurgitate.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
3.0
2.0
101NOP
Grade: A
Oct 1, 2023

Had him years ago, this is a retrospective review - not as impressed with him now as I once was. His lectures kind of rambled, and the TAs graded all the assignments. Survey course for political theory it is what it is. As far as a personality, he is as champagne socialist as they come. Heard he was accused of misconduct with female grad students

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

29%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

80% confidence
Based on 10 grades
Most common grades:
A (7)
B+ (2)
Drop/Withdrawal (1)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(0)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 11 reported grades
A: 7
B+: 2
Drop/Withdrawal: 1
C: 1
Common Tags
Respected (2)
Amazing lectures (2)
Get ready to read (2)
Gives good feedback (1)
Hilarious (1)
LECTURE HEAVY (1)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (1)
Participation matters (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.11 avg change
Jan
Nov
Jun
May
Jul
Oct
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

361

5.0

(1)

790377

5.0

(1)

POLITICS

5.0

(1)

NATUREPOLI

5.0

(1)

POL363

5.0

(1)
+46 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HOBBESTOMILL

5.0

WSTTRD

5.0

POLIT100

5.0

NATUR101

5.0

POLI316

5.0

Similar Professors