2.8

Steven Meyer

Economics - College of William and Mary

2.8
Quality
2.4
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
138
Reviews
2.8
Quality
2.4
Difficulty
2.8
Helpful
2.9
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

138

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

19

4

31

3

38

2

37

1

13

What Students Say

GO TO CLASS, and try your hardest to stay awake

ECON101 - 3.0 rating

kinda rude when you need help

ECON102 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Not enough grade data to predict

Grade Distribution
A(0)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 1 reported grades
Rather_Not_Say: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.03 avg change
Apr
May
Nov
Dec
Jan
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

375

5.0

(1)

ECON

5.0

(1)

ECN102375

4.0

(1)

SEVERAL

4.0

(1)

ECON375

4.0

(10)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

102MACRO

4.0

ECON1012

3.5

MACROECONOMICS

3.0

MACRO

3.0

ECON102

2.5

Reviews (138)
3.0
3.0
ECON102
Dec 18, 2002

kinda rude when you need help. avoid if possible

4.0
1.0
ECON102
Feb 3, 2003

He was very helpful when I went to see him. Better than Gerlach.

1.0
1.0
ECON101
Feb 19, 2003

No Comments

2.0
1.0
ECON307
Feb 21, 2003

Learned absolutely nothing in his classes. Easy grader to cover his incompetence

5.0
1.0
ECON102
Feb 26, 2003

No Comments

3.0
2.0
ECON102
Mar 26, 2003

a funny guy

3.0
4.0
ECON1012
Mar 29, 2003

Pretty hard to learn in his class. Read the book, go to class for tests.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Apr 1, 2003

pretty easy if you study for the tests and a laid back teaching style

4.0
2.0
ECON307
Apr 7, 2003

both tests were take-home and the final didn't count, nice for those of us looking to boost our gpa's

2.0
2.0
ECON102
Apr 7, 2003

stinks...ENOUGH WITH THE T SHEETS!!

3.0
1.0
ECON102
Apr 10, 2003

No Comments

2.0
4.0
ECON307
Apr 27, 2003

stats shouldn't be this hard...he let us take home tests since none of use knew what we were doing

4.0
3.0
ECON1012
Apr 28, 2003

Lectures aren't necessary, just read the book. All multi-choice final is no good. Funny guy.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
May 13, 2003

Don't learn anything from lectures, exams are not as easy as you would think, grades are curved. Take someone else for 102 to be better prepared for 304.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
May 16, 2003

No Comments

3.0
1.0
ECON102
Aug 6, 2003

Watch out for the "m-kay"s

2.0
2.0
ECON102
Aug 11, 2003

Be prepared to be frustrated by a lecture full of "uhs", "m-kays", and other such syllable inserted in between sylabbles of quietly mumbled words. Still,I actaully learned alot and tests are not bad.

1.0
4.0
ECON102
Oct 23, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Oct 23, 2003

curves. didn't fail us. but his lectures are very easy, while the exams are much harder. nice guy, but maybe he shouldn't be teaching.

3.0
3.0
ECON307
Nov 3, 2003

He's OK. He Will Not fail you but it's questionable how much you will get out of his classes. v. laid back. Not as bad as some of these ratings suggest

5.0
3.0
ECON307
Nov 3, 2003

Deceptively easy classes--bring something else to do with your hands. This is because he spells things out in VERY simple terms so that everyone comes out with a basic understanding. Note: he tests on higher understanding! book is a good supplement.

2.0
2.0
ECON307
Nov 9, 2003

He's lectures are ok. Very bad lecture but a very funny. Most of the time you can skip he's class. Test for stats are not hard.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Nov 9, 2003

his quirks (such as saying mmmmk constantly) can get in the way of concentration. his lectures were easy (and pretty entertaining) but his tests were much harder. i went to get help during office hours and he played solitaire the entire time.

5.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 14, 2003

Very nice and funny.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Nov 17, 2003

oh my gosh this class is sooooo boring. try to get another professor if you want to go on in econ. he'll curve the grades though and there were no problem sets. the class moves reaaalllyy slow.

3.0
3.0
ECON307
Nov 18, 2003

No Comments

4.0
2.0
ECON307
Nov 18, 2003

I've taken three classes by him and you never have to worry about your grade. Go to class, take good notes amongst the endless "mmmks, and uhs" and you'll be fine on the tests.

1.0
3.0
ECON102
Nov 18, 2003

No Comments

3.0
2.0
ECO102307
Nov 18, 2003

he gets a bad rap sometimes. hes a funny good natured guy - maybe not a WM level prof, but teaches well enough. but he doesnt fail anyone, and uses a great curve. yay. not the clearest prof ever, but not as bad as some say

3.0
1.0
ECON102
Nov 18, 2003

He is really easy and really laid back...And very lushy, but I don't really have a problem with that...Yes - the mmmmmmmkays (212 in one hour once) are annoying, but whatev - an easy good guy

4.0
1.0
ECON307
Nov 18, 2003

Not the clearest lecturer, but generally the rumors flying around about him are just rumors. He takes his job seriously and will teach you if you allow him to. I've taken two classes with him and plan to take more.

4.0
1.0
ECN102375
Nov 19, 2003

No Comments

5.0
3.0
ECON102
Nov 20, 2003

he is really helpful when you ask for help. he is really nice guy and teacher. Teaches enough well. I'm enjoying his class

3.0
1.0
ECON102
Nov 20, 2003

Boring. Repeats himself a lot and has many 'um's and other errors in his lectures. Never lectures with urgency or purpose. And weird enough that you can't just read the book and take the test. Tests are pretty easy, though.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 21, 2003

I think he's a good teacher - he seems to be here to teach first and foremost. He knows what he's talking about and knows the best way to convey the information.

4.0
1.0
SEVERAL
Dec 3, 2003

Great guy. not so clear in lectures. Always willing to help, unless his son has a game to go to. Doesnt grade too tough. Makes class interesting.

5.0
2.0
ECON375
Dec 5, 2003

I've had Meyer for three semesters in a row, and he's the only way I've survived economics. I wouldn't recommend him for econ majors, as he goes a bit slow, but for those of us who have trouble I definatly recommend him. Oh, and he's nice in person.

3.0
3.0
ECON307
Dec 12, 2003

Can be good sometimes. Lectures are easy to understand but when you take the test you don't know anything. He's gen. OK but if can take someone else, DO IT

2.0
2.0
MACROECON
Dec 16, 2003

He never checks his email, voicemail, or comes in for office hours. His lectures are very random and repetitive and his tests do not accurately reflect the material either. If you're having trouble, you're unlikely to get any help no matter your effort.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Jan 4, 2004

Nice enough... maybe **** in class?!? A lot of ums and mmkays. The test have nothing to do with the book or the lectures, but he curves pretty generously. Not awful, not great either.

2.0
2.0
ECON102
Feb 15, 2004

awfully long class, you could leave, get coffee, come back and hes still on the same topic. Tests are easy- just look at old ones, he just changes the numbers.

2.0
1.0
ECON102
Mar 17, 2004

Um, he seems um to know um a lot um about the G uh D uh P. Not um, very uhhh clear, mmkay? Easy um grader, but very um bad uh lecturer. Mmmkay?

4.0
1.0
ECON102
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Mar 25, 2004

If you have a knack for economics, this is your kind of teacher. If you're the kind that struggles with it, he's probably not your best bet. He's a nice guy and an even nicer grader.

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Apr 7, 2004

very boring. You have no incentive to go to class

3.0
4.0
ECON102
Apr 7, 2004

This class is kind of boring, but it's required so hey. Meyer cannot uh, spit his words out, mm K, so if that annoys you, you want to, uh what, don't take it with him. I got used to it though. He is not a bad lecturer, goes slow so keeping up isn't bad.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Apr 9, 2004

No Comments

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Apr 26, 2004

easy class, awesome grader

3.0
3.0
ECON102
Apr 27, 2004

G ya know, D ya know, P, GDP!!

4.0
2.0
ECON102
May 4, 2004

Easy Grader, Tests are not too bad but his incredibly bad speaking skills (uhhh, mkay, constant rhetorical questions) can be annoying.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
May 8, 2004

meyers is very boring and his lectures are SO slow so skipping class seems like a good idea. However it is not such a good idea because all his test material is from class not the book. so suffer though the lectures and the tests will be easy.

3.0
4.0
ECON102
May 8, 2004

nice guy, good sense of humor, horribly speaking ability - literally the worst i have ever come across, curves tests a lot though

1.0
1.0
ECON102
May 9, 2004

An adventure.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
May 20, 2004

Tests are ridiculous sometimes, but curves well. Horrible lecturer to be honest, but there's nothing in the lectures that you can't learn from the book.

1.0
5.0
ECON102
May 23, 2004

I had to withdraw after failing the first exam. Curve or not, I studied for 10 hours or more and understood the materials and did not do well. His test was really not reflective of class lectures. Lectures were also extremely dry. Very repetitive too!

3.0
1.0
ECON102
Oct 21, 2004

Class is really easy but most people have no idea what's going on. You get used to the "ums" and the "m'kays?"

5.0
3.0
ECON102
Oct 29, 2004

Good Teacher. The class drags but his tests are really easy. Go to class and you wont really have to focus much on the book. Ridiculous curves. I dont think you can get below a C. You can count on an A if did well in 101.

3.0
1.0
ECON307
Nov 8, 2004

Take he for Econ Stat, take home midterms and he defiantly did not count the final.

5.0
2.0
ECON375
Nov 12, 2004

Honestly, one of the best professors I've ever had.He's EXTREMELY straightforward both in his lectures and on his tests, REALLY understanding and nice.Won't move on until he's sure that everyone's on board with the topic at hand.GO TO CLASS, or it'll be hard for you to keep up.

2.0
4.0
ECON102
Jan 19, 2005

No Comments

5.0
1.0
ECON
Mar 24, 2005

Took him several times,mmmk, and kept coming back for more. He moves slow enough and makes sure that everyone follows so you are a moron if you do poorly. Not to mention his curves and grading scales. Boring but simultaneously entertaining to watch. That aint just coffee hes drinking,so take him!

3.0
2.0
ECON102
Apr 12, 2005

He's really not that bad. His class is just incredibly average and bland. You'll learn what you need to know, and you'll get a decent grade. Minimum pain involved... he does ramble though.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
May 8, 2005

HILARIOUS MANNERISMS!! Funny body posture, great voice and way of talking. "So, you gotta take the G-you know-D-the uh-P, GDP.." Just plain funny, he is so giddy! Medium diff. tests, but curves like a madman! You can get an A. No reading necessary, at all. In fact, the book will mess you up

5.0
1.0
375
Jun 9, 2005

Loved this class! Don't really have to read if you go to class. Tests are a breeze cuz he emphasizes the material and then clarifies what he will ask. Extremely helpful and available. Boring at times, but definitely a G uh P you-know A boost!

5.0
1.0
ECON375
Oct 27, 2005

Here's the deal. Tests can be difficult, but he grades in a way I can't describe. I think I legitimately got an F on one test and came off with an A- after curving. He may seem unclear at first, but all you ever have to do is PAY ATTENTION, and he explains everything very clear and simple. GREAT PROFESSOR

3.0
2.0
ECON375
Nov 7, 2005

BORING. Every class is a battle to stay awake. There are always several people asleep every class period. The man tries, but still comes off as really bland. You learn some intersting stuff, and it is required for IR majors, but you learn a lot of the same stuff in much better ways from Int'l Political Economy with Cheng in the Govt dept.

2.0
4.0
ECON101
Nov 17, 2005

He doesn't post answers for the problem sets because he assumes that you 'know when you know something.' Awful, boring class, please wait until someone else teaches it if you value your gpa.

5.0
2.0
ECON375
Jan 2, 2006

Great class. Says "uh" and "mmkay" a lot, but is very good about explaining concepts, reviewing them each day to the farethewell. Fair grader and amazing outside of class...very smart guy. Take his class and you won't be disapointed.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Jan 4, 2006

I did fine in this class, but good lord was it painful. Lectures are impossible to follow...I stopped going in October and just read the book, and again, I did well in the class. Also, offers no means of pulling up your grades outside exams...kinda harsh. I wouldn't recommend this prof.

1.0
3.0
MACROECONOMICS
Apr 24, 2006

HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!

3.0
3.0
MACRO
Apr 30, 2006

By far the most boring class I have ever sat through. Luckily I only went to 5 and got an A- in the class. If you can't learn from the book you are screwed. And get used to the phrase "G uh D uh P ."

3.0
4.0
ECON375
May 1, 2006

Pretty tough class, covers lots of material quickly. Nice guy. Big Beard. Owns a shirt where every panel is a different color, looks ridiculous. Says "mmkay" a LOT. I decided to tally them once. 229 mmkays in an 80 minute class. Unbelievable.

3.0
3.0
MACRO
May 8, 2006

I can't decide if I recommend this prof or not. Certainly a nice, personable guy, but did not evoke much interest or understanding in the class from me.

4.0
1.0
ECON102
May 11, 2006

Very laid-back prof, so much so that it can hurt you. Knows & loves the subject; go to class and take good notes and you're fine.

2.0
4.0
102MACRO
May 11, 2006

easy material, laid-back guy, but the tests are REALLY tricky! my sr friend said the final exam was the hardest she's ever taken. questions were asked at the review session that he refused to answer, bc "we should know that" (well we didn't, and neither did the guy who asked..) he gave the tests big curves- hopefully he'll do the same for the final

3.0
2.0
ECON102
May 12, 2006

There isn't much point in going to his lectures... he doesn't explain things well & gets frustrated when you ask questions. He will easily put you to sleep. I only thought the class was easy because Economics came fairly easily to me. Many of my friends struggled.

2.0
3.0
ECON375
May 18, 2006

His tests are hard and unnecessarily long. I didn't find very many redeeming things about this class and I'm really glad I had the intermediate econ classes before I took this one!

4.0
1.0
ECON101
Jul 5, 2006

Took this as a prereq for marketing. Easy enough, but if you have particular questions tends to blow them off. Overall, would recommend, easy experience to get this class outtatheway. Nice man, pretty funny if you get past the excessive "uh" and "mkay" usage. His examples are easy to remember and he was enthusiastic enough to keep me awake.

2.0
2.0
ECON307
Nov 3, 2006

No Comments

3.0
4.0
ECON102
Nov 13, 2006

He's a very nice guy, but a very average teacher. The tests feel very hard, but he makes up for it by grading them very easily. Only 2 midterms and a final.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 17, 2006

um, i think he's on crack...seriously. class is excrutiatingly boring but he does let you out early sometimes. take ok-ish notes in class and study tests from previous semesters and you'll do fine.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 28, 2006

Go to class, take notes, skim the book. He breaks everything down so its pretty understandable and so you don't have to do the reading. Curves exams. Nice guy, just says 'uh' and 'mkay?' every other second.

1.0
4.0
ECON102
Dec 20, 2006

A bad teacher. Refuses to explain things outside of class that "should be in your notes." Test questions are poorly written, lectures are boring, and the substantial curve barely covers for the frustration you will feel in this class. Doesn't even give out the correct answers to problems/tests after the fact. Only take it pass/fail.

1.0
3.0
ECON102
Jan 24, 2007

DO NOT TAKE ECON WITH THIS GUY AT ALL COSTS. You get a better grade in the class if you just do the reading and skip all the lectures. For some reason he gave me an incomplete even though I finished all the work.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
Jan 29, 2007

If you do the readings or go to class you'll be fine. An 88 is an A and there's a curve in addition to that plus when he gives you final grades he's extremely generous and seems to round just about everyone up. Sometimes he was confusing though, and struck me as a pretty lazy/disorganized guy in general.

4.0
3.0
ECON375
Jan 29, 2007

Very lazy and disorganized person - which means, very flexible with due dates. Fairly nice guy. Lectures and textbook material dont neccesarily match up, so notes are important. Fairly challenging concepts, my warning is : Dont take the class too lightly! But, you may encounter a few take home exams.. including the final! MMMMKAAY?

3.0
4.0
ECON102
Jan 31, 2007

So LAZY! I think he gave people random final grades. My friend had a failing average and ended up with a C+. I had a B- average and ended up with a B-. Not helpful, even at review sessions. Tells us we should already know material if we ask a question or gets off topic and never really addresses question. I would def reccomend someone else.

1.0
5.0
ECON102
May 14, 2007

Worst professor I've ever had. Even after you get over the million "umkays," his lectures are horrible. He is reluctant to answer questions (he sighs audibly in front of the whole class). His tests are worded very confusingly. Take a different prof for this class!

5.0
1.0
ECON375
Nov 13, 2007

Da Bomb

2.0
3.0
ECON101
Nov 14, 2007

Nice guy, but really lazy. He says "mmmkay" all the time, and can be really confusing and not helpful. However, the book that he assigned is really easy to understand, he is very laid back and he doesn't care if you go to class or not. His tests are not too tough and he covers material very slowly. He is kinda funny in a weird way.

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Nov 14, 2007

So he's not exactly perfect, but he is a really great guy. He doesn't require attendance, but he definitely notices. If you are in class regularly, he is more inclined to help you out of class. Plus, if you read the chapters assigned in the book, you barely have to pay attention in class. Just get past the "mmkay" and you'll be fine!

3.0
4.0
ECON375
Nov 18, 2007

He's a nice guy. I took this class as an IR major and have no idea how I managed to get a B+. Do all the homework-I'm not sure if he actually checks it but if you hand it in it counts for something. Midterm was take-home and final was in-class. Unless econ is your thing I think the class is really difficult. Copy exactly what he writes and says.

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Jan 12, 2008

Easy and pretty clear. Grading system is a little crazy. If you improve, you get a better overall grade than if you're consistent. The class probably requires 15 hours of work for the entire semester.

3.0
1.0
ECON101
Jan 22, 2008

Such a slacker, but a great guy. Don't bother taking notes in class, just get all your info out of the book (esp. study graphs & equations). He adds a nice curve too. It's very difficult to get below a C. Take the class!

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Feb 9, 2008

Meyer is awesome! I had very little interest in economics before I took his class, and now I am in love with it! He makes potentially boring topics really funny. It really helped me remember the material. Basically, I've never been bored in his class, which is saying a lot. If you want to take econ, I seriously recommend Professor Meyer.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Mar 31, 2008

Meyer is such an awesome professor. He is by far one of my favorites here at william and mary. He curves a lot so if you go to class and take notes or read the book you will be fine. He also is very helpful and uses a lot of examples to make the class interesting.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Apr 21, 2008

Meyer is very boring, but he means well. I think he would be better in a smaller class. He gives big curves and extra credit - but the whole class pretty much failed the exam. Lectures are somewhat useless. The book is useful. Would consider carefully before taking again.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
May 14, 2008

Ridiculous. A 30% class average on an exam in a class of 170 means something, and it's not that everyone lacks the intelligence to pass an intro level class. 101 was fine, just take 102 with a different professor.

1.0
5.0
ECON102
May 15, 2008

This class was a joke. This man cannot teach and his tests are impossible. I got an A in 101 with a different prof., but a C in 102 with Meyer. He destroyed my GPA. Do not take this man under any circumstances. You will regret it.

1.0
4.0
ECON102
Jul 31, 2008

Wow, Econ 102 was much different that 101 with Meyer. Much more difficult, consider taking someone else. His tests were crazy. Econ 101 is still pretty good with him though.

5.0
2.0
ECON102
Sep 1, 2008

I had both 101 & 102. Textbook is not really necessary , but it is helpful to figure out where the prof is. Tests are comprehensive, so almost no memorization is needed (but you have to really "understand" the principles if you want an A).

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Sep 5, 2008

Meyer's tests were hard, but the curve his gives is incredible and he won't fail you unless you cheat. Class consists of 3 tests (30%, 30% and 40%). Take this class, attendance is not mandatory!

4.0
3.0
ECON101
Nov 13, 2008

I took him for 101 and he's excellent. Goofy, avoids technology, lectures without slides, funny examples, and um, a hil-um-arious um manner of um speaking m'kay.Take him.

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Nov 27, 2008

I took him for 101 and 102. he doesn't take attendance, and he is a BORING lecturer. you could just read the book and show up on test day and youll be fine. if you go to class, you dont need the book he only gives 3 tests which he curves like crazy. IF YOU WANT AN A, TAKE MEYER. IF YOU WANT TO ACTUALLY LEARN AND UNDERSTAND ECON, DON'T TAKE HIM.

2.0
5.0
ECON102
Jan 13, 2009

He must have read this, because he really does not curve that much anymore it seems. Whoever said an A was easy must be a genius. Horrible lecturer, incredibly unclear and confusing. USE the practice book for tests-- it helps a lot.

4.0
4.0
ECON102
Feb 11, 2009

I really liked Meyer. His lectures aren't the most entertaining, but he does know what he is talking about. And he is really good at answering questions during office hours.

2.0
2.0
ECON102
Apr 8, 2009

He is friendly in class and his lectures are easy enough to follow, but he is not necessarily helpful outside of class. Agreed with below comments that using the Study Guide that come with the textbook is very helpful. STUDY for the tests!

5.0
4.0
ECON102
May 14, 2009

much better than haulman! i went to every class, sat up front, and took great notes and it paid off. he's a really nice guy, too. he made me love macro. the tests really aren't bad at all if you review your notes. i never even bought the book.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Jul 12, 2009

Overall, a great professor. He taught at an easy pace, repeated key concepts many times, and there was any remaining confusion, a simple skim through the book helped a lot. Because of him, I am now a decided econ major.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Aug 29, 2009

I took him for 102 not 101. I didn't even buy the textbook for him. He is such a great teacher. He spends a lot of time in the beginning of class reviewing though, which can be boring, but he makes you understand the material well. A little funny, too. Pretty easy A if you just went to class everyday.

4.0
4.0
ECON102
Nov 7, 2009

Can't really recommend his class, it was a little bit of a struggle for someone who's not naturally good with this stuff. He knows his stuff though and the midterm wasn't too tricky.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
Nov 11, 2009

Meyer is pretty awesome. I had him for Micro and Macro, and I definitely recommend him. After you get past the "mmk"s, he is a pretty funny guy. He's nice and pretty helpful if you go to office hours. Show up to class (pay attention), take decent notes, and you'll be fine.

2.0
3.0
ECON101
Nov 12, 2009

Meyer just lectures on, doesn't stop for questions very often. If you understand what he is talking about, you are fine, otherwise your in trouble, because he is not particularly helpful. Buy the book OR go to class, no need for both.

4.0
1.0
ECON102
Dec 11, 2009

meyer is the man. notes in class are whats on the test. mmkay's all day. good grader. go to his last day of class. all im sayin

1.0
4.0
ECON101
Jan 12, 2010

Meyer's methods of teaching were not helpful for someone who doesn't take to the material naturally. That being said, it's impossible to get below a B- in this class. Prof. Meyer gives a HUGE curve for his exams. (Personally I think he assigns grades randomly, I deserved a F) But, If you want to learn something about Econ, don't take this class.

5.0
4.0
ECON101
Apr 1, 2010

really adorable and nice. says "mmk" about every other word, and fun for blowout. lectures are really boring, and tests are a little all over the place, but overall not a bad class, and the practice tests on the textbook are really helpful.

4.0
2.0
ECON102
May 19, 2010

Meyer's a good guy and an easy professor. He knows the material and tells you everything you need in class. A little boring, but a helpful professor.

5.0
1.0
ECON102
May 20, 2010

Prof Meyer is an interesting character. If you go to class, you're set. He breaks everything you need to know down. Anything he doesn't cover will NOT be tested. Tests are incredibly easy. Final is very simple. Fairly easy A if you take the time the night before tests to comprehend everything.

3.0
1.0
ECON101
Dec 1, 2010

No need to go to class all of the time. The textbook is far more clear than his lectures. No need to buy the current edition of the book. Tests are easy, and there is sometimes a curve. The class is not very interesting.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
Dec 3, 2010

The key to doing well on the tests is to STUDY THE OLD TESTS. if you can find a couple old versions to study you'll probably get an A. I didn't use the book at all. I know its tempting to skip but don't. If you take good notes in class, you'll be fine. And hes hilarious..."mkay"

5.0
2.0
ECON101
Dec 21, 2010

Meyer is the man. Definitely a really good guy. As far as his teaching goes, he understands what he's teaching very well, however his lectures seem almost improvised as he uses no slides or anything like that. Overall a pretty straightforward class and an easy A or B if you put in at least some effort into it.

4.0
3.0
ECON102
Dec 25, 2010

His lectures are pretty dry, but he knows the stuff really well. Class is not mandatory, although it's very helpful to attend lectures since he explains things somewhat differently than the text. Overall, pretty much what you expect for a 100-level large class.

3.0
2.0
ECON101
Jan 10, 2011

Incredibly easy class. Stay awake in lecture (although attendance is not mandatory), take notes, go to his multiple review sessions before the test. Read the textbook if you are confused or as supplementary material. But don't pay too much for the book because his lectures come straight out of his, mkay, brain, mkay?

2.0
2.0
ECON101
Feb 1, 2011

Meyer is a bad professor, but he's the easiest for Microeconomics. Take him over anyone else if you have to take the class. Lectures are a pure repetition of what you read in the book. Not too difficult, but boring as hell.

5.0
1.0
ECON102
Feb 1, 2011

I can understand why there are some people say that he's really boring. But on the other side of the picture, he makes everything so clear! This is indeed something about personal values. For me, I value more on clarity. Also, he teaches with a clear plan, which will make you know the whole picture of what's goin on in the macroecon world.

2.0
1.0
ECON101
Feb 13, 2011

While I found Meyer to be a hilarious, cool guy I am having a hard time giving him high ratings. Lectures are hard to stay awake in. The class is really easy and will require very little effort on your part, but you will finish the class with the feeling that you learned very little if anything at all.

2.0
4.0
ECON102
Apr 27, 2011

Economics is my worst subject, so it might be different if you're into it, but while Meyer seems like a nice guy he's not a very good teacher. Often neglects to write down or draw what he's explaining and literally puts people to sleep.

2.0
1.0
ECON102
May 4, 2011

Read the chapters and study the old test and go to review sessions and you'll get an A. That's what I did.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
May 17, 2011

If you read the book and try to follow along with his lectures, then the class is really manageable. He can be boring, but the class isn't bad. I studied from the book and my notes, as well as from old tests, and I did really well. You just need to do well on one test- he's doesn't strictly average your test scores.

1.0
3.0
ECON102
May 17, 2011

Impossible to understand. Don't bother buying the book, he rarely uses it. Hardly a WM caliber professor.

2.0
1.0
ECON102
Nov 1, 2011

This class is painfully boring and Meyer makes it 10 times more boring. EW.

4.0
1.0
ECON102
Nov 22, 2011

It's easy, and he's clear. This class doesn't have the thrill value of most, but if you show up you should get an A.

2.0
3.0
ECON102
Dec 3, 2011

Disappointing experience in this class. The only resource of any type he provided us with throughout the entire semester was the syllabus. He is not a very accessible professor, and does not provide students with nearly enough practice materials or opportunities to boost grade. Best parts of the class were the scales on the exams.

2.0
1.0
ECON101
Dec 4, 2011

mmmmmkay

3.0
3.0
ECON101
Dec 6, 2011

Meyer was an interesting experience. The class really shouldn't be that hard but I still found myself somewhat struggling with the info. He's not a great teacher, tests on what he teaches and not the book, but he knows his stuff. His tests weren't too bad (mostly MC and short answer). His assumes everyone gets what he's teaching right away. Mmmkayy

4.0
2.0
ECON101
Dec 16, 2011

The lectures were clear and easy to follow, and he follows the textbook pretty well so if you miss class its not to hard to catch up. The grade is just 3 tests which is nice.

3.0
2.0
ECON102
Jan 12, 2012

I found him very confusing. The material is usually clear, but he sometimes presents it in a roundabout way that makes it hard to follow. I took him for an intro course, so I don't know if he would have been harder to follow in a higher-level course. He's a good guy, and his tests are fairly straightforward. Offers review session before each test.

2.0
2.0
ECON102
Jan 25, 2012

Ehhhhhhhh...

3.0
3.0
ECON101
Apr 3, 2012

GO TO CLASS, and try your hardest to stay awake! He's a really nice guy, but his voice is lulling. he says "okay" a lot. He actually explains things pretty well, so just stay up and take notes. The book is a bit harder to understand, and his tests are similar to his lectures.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Not enough grade data to predict

Grade Distribution
A(0)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 1 reported grades
Rather_Not_Say: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.03 avg change
Apr
May
Nov
Dec
Jan
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

375

5.0

(1)

ECON

5.0

(1)

ECN102375

4.0

(1)

SEVERAL

4.0

(1)

ECON375

4.0

(10)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

102MACRO

4.0

ECON1012

3.5

MACROECONOMICS

3.0

MACRO

3.0

ECON102

2.5

Similar Professors