4.1

Storrs McCall

Philosophy - McGill University

4.1
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
100%
Would Retake
99
Reviews
4.1
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
3.9
Helpful
4.3
Clarity

100%

Would Retake

99

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
99 total ratings

5

53

4

30

3

11

2

4

1

1

What Students Say

He is brilliant, humble, and endearing in a grandfatherly way

PHIL481 - 5.0 rating

Darren Bifford was my TA and I loved him

200A - 4.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

50%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
A+ (1)
B+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 3 reported grades
A: 1
A+: 1
B+: 1
Common Tags
Respected (2)
Inspirational (2)
Hilarious (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.11 avg change
Dec
Jan
Dec
Jan
Oct
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

200348

5.0

(1)

107200A

5.0

(1)

LAW

5.0

(2)

FUNDAMENTALS

5.0

(1)

PHILO200

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL100

4.0

200

3.0

200348

3.0

PHIL201

3.0

PHILLAW

3.0

Reviews (97)
5.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY
Feb 4, 2002

No Comments

5.0
1.0
107200A
Mar 13, 2002

A visonary. Entertaining, thought-provoking. A role model. One of McGill's best

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Apr 26, 2002

No Comments

3.0
3.0
PHIL348
Oct 17, 2002

he does not answer questions, or justify why he is right. besides that, he's pr

5.0
3.0
PHIL200A
Oct 18, 2002

No Comments

5.0
4.0
PHIL200
Oct 29, 2002

He's a really intresting and nice guy and he explains the books in a clear way.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Nov 17, 2002

Very funny and his lectures aren't too bad.

3.0
3.0
PHIL200
Nov 29, 2002

Interesting if you like te course, but this prof.'s not for the layman

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 2, 2002

we want storrs to be our neighbour.

4.0
1.0
PHIL200
Dec 9, 2002

This guy rocks. I like how he shoots down people who make asinine points.

3.0
2.0
PHIL200
Jan 7, 2003

course lectures were pretty decent, but watch out for those mullet bird stories!

5.0
3.0
PHIL348
Mar 10, 2003

So funny and clever...LOVE HIM!

3.0
3.0
200
Apr 4, 2003

Doesn't put much effort into his lectures. Condescending to the students - treats them like morons. This course needs more content and less papers.

3.0
2.0
PHIL200
Apr 6, 2003

This guy is 500 years old. Funny to listen to, easy class.

1.0
4.0
PHIL200
May 5, 2003

His lectures were very difficult to follow. His lectures are spoken condescendingly. Very unpleasant teacher except for his occasional funny dry jokes.

4.0
1.0
PHIL
Aug 22, 2003

Easy class, but McCall is a condescending jerk.

4.0
2.0
PHIL348
Aug 31, 2003

Best course ever, best prof ever. Knows more about everything than anyone, but he's quite unapproachable. Great lectures, keeps the class involved all the time. FUNNY GUY!

5.0
1.0
PHIL200
Sep 20, 2003

I love his stories about Cindres, funny guy

5.0
3.0
PHIL201
Oct 21, 2003

Greatest man ever! Knows how to shoot down dumb asses who should keep their mouths shut and not ever talk again.

3.0
3.0
PHIL200A
Nov 10, 2003

S.Mc.C is the man!

5.0
3.0
PHIL348
Nov 17, 2003

He's a senior, stuck in his ways so don't try to call him on it. But he gives the most fantastic lectures and is great to listen to. You won't be falling asleep in these classes.

5.0
2.0
LAW
Nov 23, 2003

This guy is insanely brilliant. His logical and reason scare me. Funny too. His lectures are quite good but you for assignments you need to stay on your toes.

4.0
3.0
PHIL348
Nov 28, 2003

Storrs is the most inteligent and sarcastic prof i've ever had. Gives the most intersting lectures at McGill. His arrogance makes him so sexy. I adore him.

4.0
3.0
PHILLAW
Nov 29, 2003

Good prof, interesting lectures, easy to talk to, funny because he's old

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 2, 2003

S.Mc.C is a great prof. He is funny, intriguing, and stirred my interest for philosophy.

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 4, 2003

he's a good lecturer, pretty funny, but sometimes rambles off topic; i would definitely take another class of his sometime though

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 4, 2003

his way of explaining concepts is to tell a story (usually a funny one) and you dont realise he's making a point until the end of the story, at which time you understand perfectly.

5.0
3.0
LAW
Dec 15, 2003

Storrs is great - really knows how to animate his lectures.

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Jan 2, 2004

Brilliant prof (one of the smartest I've ever had), but prides himself in his ability to show students that they are wrong when they ask qustions

4.0
4.0
PHIL200
Jan 3, 2004

Funny, smart, interesting. But tough final and too many papers!

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Feb 10, 2004

I hate philosophy, but Storrs was to date the best prof I've had at McGill. He makes the most boring, inane topics fascinating in lecture, and even made me not mind doing the reading. If you can, definitely take his class...just the lectures are worth it!

4.0
2.0
PHIL200A
Feb 11, 2004

Great person, projects the depth of the subject matter in a manner easy to understand and interesting as well. Excellent course with him to take.

4.0
3.0
PHIL200A
Feb 20, 2004

Storrs is a good guy, his lectures can drag a bit though

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Mar 30, 2004

so sweet

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Apr 3, 2004

Great lecturer. Altho I wished we would show his mind once in a while, he always grins mysteriously when asked any Qs on personal opinion & avoids it subtetly. His course is worth taking, be prepared to write at least 4 essays.

2.0
2.0
PHILOSOPHY
Jun 28, 2004

was very rude to me. I went to his office and he wouldn't pay attention to me and started calling someone while I was talking to him. He's super nice in class but that day he treated me like scum.

5.0
1.0
PHIL200
Sep 13, 2004

why would a philosophy professor answer questions about his personal opinions? that is so irrelevant it hurts. sometimes it's best to try to form opinions of one's own while the prof elucidates the literature.

2.0
1.0
PHIL200
Oct 5, 2004

He and Cinders are cute. But his lectures are completely useless

5.0
1.0
PHIL200
Oct 20, 2004

Is there anyway that I can adopt this guy as my Grandpa? He'd be a riot at Thanksgiving... so, does the turkey exist? Does the cranberry sauce participate in cranberry sauceness?

5.0
1.0
PHIL200
Oct 21, 2004

Nicest dude ever

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Nov 18, 2004

He is extremely knowledgable in the field, and wise beyond most people's understanding, due to his philosophical way of speaking. Intellectual and the subject is very interesting.

5.0
3.0
200348
Nov 21, 2004

The legends are true - Storrs remains the 'ne plus ultra' of philosophy at McGill. Take his courses - take _all_ his courses.

5.0
2.0
FUNDAMENTALS
Dec 4, 2004

Great prof. GREAT.

5.0
1.0
PHILO200
Grade: A
Dec 10, 2004

Very clear lectures. I never read any of the books, and I still did well, because he explains everything. Essay topics are broad enough to be easy to bang out in an hour and a half. However, he often rephrases your questions for you, thus not always best at answering what you want.

3.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 29, 2004

Nice, clear, but PHIL 200 is a baby class. I learned more in CEGEP philosophy classes. But if you're fresh out of high school or have no prior experience with the subject, you'll probably find it's a solid intro.

5.0
1.0
PHIL200
Jan 11, 2005

SMC is the man. I wish this man was my grandfather, he would never get boring. He knows his stuff very well, and teaches it clearly. His lectures essentially summarize the books, so don't even worry about reading. He is very funny, wait till he demonstrates free will.

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Mar 11, 2005

McCall is sooo sweet!in the final, he came round and asked EVERYONE if they were ok, or if they needed any help.HE ROCKS!Take the class just for the prof, i love him-i so want to adopt him as my grandad.just so cute!

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Apr 7, 2005

Storrs was an amazing professor, he made the class very interesting and fun, because of him I chose to do my minor in Philosophy(I'm in management, so I couldn't major in it). Take any class you can with Storrs, you won't regret it.

5.0
2.0
INTROTOPHIL
Grade: A+
Aug 2, 2005

S Mc C ! Love him! He's such a cute little man...very nice prof, willing to help or discuss things with you. Grades depend on your TA.. but it's a pretty easy course if you go to the lectures. Final was a breeze, the papers are a bit annoying. Great class overall.

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Aug 3, 2005

He's such an amazing prof...lectures are interesting...class is good, but TAs can make or break your grade...overall a good intro class

2.0
3.0
PHIL200
Oct 1, 2005

I found it to be an interesting intro class, since had never taken philosophy before. He seems very sweet but doesn't really answer questions and sometimes contradicts himself. For example if you ask him why the sky is blue...he will just repeat back to you why is the sky blue, then move on to something else. TAs grade your papers, suck up to them.

5.0
2.0
ARLE101
Oct 19, 2005

Storrs is amazing! his genius is officially intimidating, and every lecture he gives should be valued. you wont regret taking his classes

4.0
4.0
PHIL200
Nov 26, 2005

The TA's grade your work so the prof has very little effect on how you do in the course except he is there to clarify your readings (which is good) and to look all cute (and give philosophical references to his Dog, Cinders). I personally find that the TA's are more clear when expanding on the topics but your papers may always get the same mark...

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 2, 2005

Excellent, really brings life to otherwise dull or incomprehensible material. Taking Philosophy 200 with him gives you an excellent introduction to the field.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200A
Dec 10, 2005

amazing prof! love him

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 12, 2005

Very cute old man. He's very good at explaining concepts, using many examples. However he's horrible at answering questions because he just dodges them. the marking is screwed up because the TAs mark so differently. the material is interesting enough but becomes tedious & boring. an unbelievably easy final.

4.0
3.0
200A
Dec 17, 2005

Overall a good prof and a cute old man. A good introduction to philosophy, although not very stimulating if you've taken any philosophy before. He's great at refuting people who like to hear themselves talk. Renders the material simple. Marks depend because essays are marked by TAs. Darren Bifford was my TA and I loved him.

5.0
3.0
200
Dec 22, 2005

SMC is a very smart, very intelligent, very stimulating and caring man. His 200 class provides a good introduction HOWEVER as is typical in these courses the TAs play favourites and grade subjectively which is not the greatest thing. I look forward to taking a smaller, upper-level course with him...

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Mar 20, 2006

Storrs is a great teacher, very funny, and has very stimulating lectures. You need to think hard for the essays though, and the final exam is a little tough.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Mar 28, 2006

Storrs presents a solid introduction to philosophy: the man knows the subject and structures the course in a very balanced. You will know right away whether or not philosophy is for you after the course. While Storrs is a fine philosopher and professor, the course suffers from the usual introductory/TA-dependant anti-student grading system.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 4, 2006

The sweetest old man you'll ever meet. He's like your favourite grandparent, only more intelligent. Sometimes he's a little spacey, but he's awesome to listen to. I'd get depressed when I missed class. The TAs are pretty lousy, though, and they're the ones who grade you, so don't expect to sail through.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 20, 2006

Storrs is a pleasure to have as an instructor teaching a thoroughly designed intro course to philosophy, and exuding a warm personality to boot.**- The TA I had is bloody AmAzInG, if you are capable of being challenged and want someone who is Truly on the ball, take Tim Budde. In all honesty he was more brilliant than any of my profs this semester.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Jan 10, 2007

Prof. McCall is a seemingly sweet, funny older man. Yeah, he tended to dodge some questions but he was typically upfront and seemed like he actually wanted to teach, not just to tell us what he knew. He doesn't use WebCT. My TA Jessica Lim was freaking amazing, you're lucky if you get her--great at explaining the unclear chapters in the books.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Apr 18, 2007

Eh... "S Mc C" is a sweetheart of a man, knows what he's talking about, and makes tricky philosophical material clear for his students. Unfortunately, he has the annoying habit of dodging almost every question students ask him, usually by semantics. Also, he doesn't even let people finish questions before interrupting to evade them.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Sep 12, 2007

He is a true badass — the coolest guy you will ever meet. He's exactly waht you would imagine a philosophy preofessor to be: eccentric, witty, and at times random. He's totally sassy. Take one of his classes.

4.0
3.0
PHIL201
Oct 22, 2007

Teaches with a passion. He's entertaining and explains things that should be complicated pretty clearly.

5.0
1.0
PHIL200
Oct 23, 2007

His lectures are a joy to attend. He is a funny, intelligent and well-spoken professor who actually includes students in the lecturing process. He's also absolutely adorable and will melt your heart! Plus, good grades are fairly easy to get, as the lectures are clear and the T.As (especially Timothy Budde) are very helpful. TAKE THIS CLASS!

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Nov 7, 2007

I love this man. He's perfect.

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 3, 2007

Great guy, exactly what I expected from a philosophy prof. He's got a great wit to him, and his eccentricities keep class interesting. He told me he was the founder of philosophy in eastern Africa, and that he once got attacked by a python. Can't beat that..

4.0
4.0
PHIL200
Dec 3, 2007

He's a pretty good professor but is unfortunately outshined by his TA Timothy Budde or as many like to call him... Timbo.

3.0
5.0
PHIL200
Dec 4, 2007

I thoroughly enjoyed his lectures, and it was an interesting class to broaden your perspective as a 'mature' college student. Pretty clear in explaining difficult concepts in intro philo, but hated the way he avoided argument by semantisc. GO TO EVERY CONFERENCE!!!!!!! And now I conclude that Timothy Budde is God.

5.0
4.0
PHIL200
Dec 9, 2007

the cutie-wootiest little old man you've ever seen. the most difficlt part of this class is resisting the urge to run to the front of the room and cuddle him. knows his stuff and is good at explaining it, good conferences and not too much work

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 15, 2007

Amazingly quick witted and knowledgeable on all of the subject matter along with a vast knowledge of science. Could not imagine a prof who could teach the class better than him.

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Jan 3, 2008

i absoultey LOVE this man. 4 essays, one final. timothy budde runs great confrences and clarifies things alot, but marks pretty brutally. i recommend this course. S Mc C is a legend. He's just too cute

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Jun 13, 2008

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Nov 13, 2008

Excellent. Doesn't use slides, doesn't use WebCT, doesn't appear to know what Minerva is but is all the better for it. Always informative and tells weird little stories that help keep you awake. As for those who feel he just undermined their points using semantics, I think he just didn't have time for all of the stupid ideas that came up.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Jan 5, 2009

Very knowledgeable and an extremely good lecturer. If you want to take and intro class in philosophy, this should be it. All the main issues and philosophers are discussed (albeit only briefly).

4.0
4.0
PHIL200
Jan 15, 2009

He is the JEWEL of McGill!!! If you are at McGill, and at least somewhat interested in Philosophy, seriously consider it. One of the very few profs at McGill that you actually sense fine wisdom without being intimidated. Lectures can be intense and papers can be difficult to grasp! (experience can be exponentially enhanced by choosing S/U option)

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 7, 2009

Fantastic Prof, fantastic course. I'm actually sad that it's over. Take it.

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Jan 14, 2010

Probably the most learned man I ever met at McGill - a pleasure to attend his class. He made philosophy interesting, but sometimes what he says can go way over my head. Take his course though, the final is easy if you study hard for it.

2.0
4.0
PHIL200
Jan 22, 2010

Storrs is a cool guy, too bad he doesn't run the class. TAs are horrible and you will want to stab yourself during every conference. They are incredibly boring and the essays are marked without mercy. I advice you not to take the class. Join some reading group at your local library and you will probably learn the same amount.

3.0
4.0
PHIL100
Nov 11, 2010

Hard but awesome

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Nov 25, 2010

Storrs is a sweet, adorable, old man, but this class is VERY basic. It is actually quite boring. The readings are easy and he goes over them in detail. He isn't responsive to objections though...Michel-Antoine Xhignesse better be your TA! He's hilarious and EXTREMELY helpful- a stickler for structure, but actually goes over the material in depth.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 9, 2010

this class got me through first semester. he's so entertaining, going to miss him! i hope he knows he has inspired many of his students!

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 10, 2010

McCall is the cutest old man alive. Each class is like story time! He's so nice and clear in lectures. I'm going to miss him so much! Class is not hard if you attend lectures and read the material. Four essays, 500 words, 15% each + Final exam. Not hard for a first year class but lots of reading! But it was all worth it for McCall!

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Jan 6, 2011

Most adorable old man ever - spent class wishing he was my grandfather and restraining myself from getting up and hugging him! It really is story time with Storrs. Take this class before he retires, but to be honest you might find the readings a bit confusing if philosophy isn't your cup of tea.

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Sep 26, 2011

The most attractive man I have ever met. His intellect is something we can only aspire to.

3.0
2.0
PHIL200
Nov 29, 2011

no use in going to class, he just explains everything from the books. go to class for a fun time though, cuz storrs is the boss. he will give extremely clear examples so id you read something and don't get it, just go and it'll all make sense. don't challenge him, he's always right. very light work, only 4 essays and an exam.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 6, 2011

storrs is easily the best philosophy prof i have ever had. such a cute old grandfatherly figure. i looked forward to his class each day. work load really isnt that challenging.. just four short papers. TAs are fairly tough at first, but once you know what they want its much easier

3.0
4.0
PHIL200
Dec 12, 2011

McCall is hilarious - keep track of his comments cause he's so funny ... but in terms of lecturing, he tends to talk in circles for most of the class about one vague point so you tend to zone in and out of paying attention. He's super sweet though, awesome prof. TA's mark hard at first, but they easy up as the term goes by.

5.0
3.0
PHIL200
Dec 13, 2011

He's really good at explaining the book, and that's really helpful because the books that we read for this class were not the easiest (Plato and Descartes, especially). Having a nice TA matters 'cause TAs grade your paper.

5.0
2.0
PHIL200
Dec 14, 2011

Storrs McCall is a fantastic professor, brilliant intellectual, and a great man. The class is very interesting and he has a way of engaging the class in discussion.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Jan 10, 2012

You need to take this man before he retires finally. Go to lectures, don't screw around on your laptop, and listen to his lecture, it's worth it. He is in his late 80s, has been doing this course for literally decades, but is still incredibly passionate, which will rub off on you. Standing ovation at the end of the last lecture.

4.0
2.0
PHIL348
Dec 16, 2012

Phil of Law with Storrs was fun! The concepts were really interesting and there was barely any theory involved, just a lot of talk about real life examples and hypotheticals. The papers were interesting and marked fairly.

4.0
2.0
PHIL470
Jan 20, 2014

Professor McCall is a charming old man (late 80s) who's been doing philosophy for ages. I had him in a very small class (15 people) on a subject which he loves (Time). At this very personal level, he was extremely friendly. His marking is very fair if you show the slightest interest in his work. Take a class with him before he retires!

5.0
3.0
PHIL481
Grade: B+
Oct 16, 2016
Would take again

The seminar I took with Dr. McCall (Topics in Philosophy) was a delightful class. The topic discussed was decision-makingi.e. themes of deliberation and determinism. He is brilliant, humble, and endearing in a grandfatherly way. I always left his class inspired and cheerful.

Respected
Inspirational
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
PHIL481
Nov 25, 2017
Would take again

Based old man. Smart as a whip. My second favourite philosophy prof. His seminars were always a highlight of my day.

Respected
Inspirational
Hilarious
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

50%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
A+ (1)
B+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 3 reported grades
A: 1
A+: 1
B+: 1
Common Tags
Respected (2)
Inspirational (2)
Hilarious (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.11 avg change
Dec
Jan
Dec
Jan
Oct
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

200348

5.0

(1)

107200A

5.0

(1)

LAW

5.0

(2)

FUNDAMENTALS

5.0

(1)

PHILO200

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL100

4.0

200

3.0

200348

3.0

PHIL201

3.0

PHILLAW

3.0

Similar Professors